• PotentStream Supplements:

    What Is Potent Stream?

    Potent Stream is a male health formula that helps to maintain healthy urinary and prostate health by killing off all the toxins in the body. It is a natural formula designed using clinically researched ingredients. The supplement is manufactured in Ohio, United States and the facility is FDA-registered and GMP-certified.

    The Potent Stream dietary supplement is available in liquid form. Each bottle contains 2 fl. oz. (60 ml) of the formula, offering 30 servings to the user. This male health formula is designed to naturally alleviate symptoms for individuals experiencing prostate issues.

    How Does Potent Stream Work To Deliver Results?

    One of the factors that causes conditions such as BPH or benign prostatic hyperplasia in men is ageing. Changes in testicular cells and uncontrollable growth of these cells can cause prostate enlargement. Usually, these are common among men who are above 50 years of age. However, the latest reports show that the symptoms of BPH have started to appear in men who are in their late 30s and early 40s.

    The underlying reason why BPH has been seen appearing in young men is because of toxins that enter the body through water or food. It has been found that water contains microscopic matter, such as minerals like calcium carbonate, microplastics, or medical waste. These matters build up deposits in the urinary system and also cause the prostate to enlarge. The common symptoms of BPH are frequent need to urinate, trouble in urination, inability to empty the bladder fully, and urinary tract infections.

    Benefits Of Taking Potent Stream Pills:

    Now, let’s look at the benefits of using the Potent Stream male health booster.

    Supports a healthy urinary system:

    The Potent Stream helps to improve the functioning of the urinary system. It helps to clear out toxins and mineral deposits in the urinary tract. Thereby it prevents conditions such as kidney stones and improves urine flow. Users can see a difference within two weeks of taking this formula.

    Improves prostate function:

    Potent Stream contains important nutrients that help keep the prostate gland healthy and improve its functioning. It prevents the overgrowth of testicular cells which leads to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The formula also fights cancer cells and prohibits prostate cancer.

    Restores bladder control:

    Potent Stream helps to restore bladder control in men. As it helps to prevent conditions such as BPH, it eventually helps users regain control over their bladder. It reduces the frequency of urination and users can now empty their bladder fully. The results can be seen in two or three weeks of taking the formula.

    Here is a summary of what we have discussed about Potent Stream so far. It is a male health formula developed using clinically studied natural ingredients. The supplement is manufactured in an FDA-registered and GMP-certified facility, in Ohio, United States. It is processed under sterile, strict, and according to precise standards.

    The Potent Stream solution is toxin-free and non-GMO. The formula is easy to take and no users have raised any complaints or concerns after trying it. The dietary supplement can be purchased at affordable prices and comes with free shipping when purchased from the official site.

    Considering all these factors, the Potent Stream looks like a legitimate male health supplement and is worth trying.


    Visit The Official Potent Stream Website For Detailed Ingredient Information: https://tinyurl.com/32jwa4mx

    #prostatehealth #potentstream #restoebladdercontrol #prostatefunction #urinarysystem
    PotentStream Supplements: What Is Potent Stream? Potent Stream is a male health formula that helps to maintain healthy urinary and prostate health by killing off all the toxins in the body. It is a natural formula designed using clinically researched ingredients. The supplement is manufactured in Ohio, United States and the facility is FDA-registered and GMP-certified. The Potent Stream dietary supplement is available in liquid form. Each bottle contains 2 fl. oz. (60 ml) of the formula, offering 30 servings to the user. This male health formula is designed to naturally alleviate symptoms for individuals experiencing prostate issues. How Does Potent Stream Work To Deliver Results? One of the factors that causes conditions such as BPH or benign prostatic hyperplasia in men is ageing. Changes in testicular cells and uncontrollable growth of these cells can cause prostate enlargement. Usually, these are common among men who are above 50 years of age. However, the latest reports show that the symptoms of BPH have started to appear in men who are in their late 30s and early 40s. The underlying reason why BPH has been seen appearing in young men is because of toxins that enter the body through water or food. It has been found that water contains microscopic matter, such as minerals like calcium carbonate, microplastics, or medical waste. These matters build up deposits in the urinary system and also cause the prostate to enlarge. The common symptoms of BPH are frequent need to urinate, trouble in urination, inability to empty the bladder fully, and urinary tract infections. Benefits Of Taking Potent Stream Pills: Now, let’s look at the benefits of using the Potent Stream male health booster. Supports a healthy urinary system: The Potent Stream helps to improve the functioning of the urinary system. It helps to clear out toxins and mineral deposits in the urinary tract. Thereby it prevents conditions such as kidney stones and improves urine flow. Users can see a difference within two weeks of taking this formula. Improves prostate function: Potent Stream contains important nutrients that help keep the prostate gland healthy and improve its functioning. It prevents the overgrowth of testicular cells which leads to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The formula also fights cancer cells and prohibits prostate cancer. Restores bladder control: Potent Stream helps to restore bladder control in men. As it helps to prevent conditions such as BPH, it eventually helps users regain control over their bladder. It reduces the frequency of urination and users can now empty their bladder fully. The results can be seen in two or three weeks of taking the formula. Here is a summary of what we have discussed about Potent Stream so far. It is a male health formula developed using clinically studied natural ingredients. The supplement is manufactured in an FDA-registered and GMP-certified facility, in Ohio, United States. It is processed under sterile, strict, and according to precise standards. The Potent Stream solution is toxin-free and non-GMO. The formula is easy to take and no users have raised any complaints or concerns after trying it. The dietary supplement can be purchased at affordable prices and comes with free shipping when purchased from the official site. Considering all these factors, the Potent Stream looks like a legitimate male health supplement and is worth trying. Visit The Official Potent Stream Website For Detailed Ingredient Information: https://tinyurl.com/32jwa4mx #prostatehealth #potentstream #restoebladdercontrol #prostatefunction #urinarysystem
    0 Comments 0 Shares 5K Views 0 Reviews
  • 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐌 𝟐 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐀𝐅𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐀𝐗𝐗

    A South Korean research team analyzing semen samples from a healthy man who took 3 doses of the Pfizer shot in 2022 has discovered nanobots living amongst his sperm.

    Dr. Young Mi Lee and her team identified 17 separate “self assembling entities” inside the sperm sample, isolated in saline, and analyzed in a nationally certified IVF clinic.

    This means the nanobots survived and grew for more than 2 years inside his body, without causing any noticeable side effects.

    Dr. Lee has observed that the nanobots grew better in sperm than blood, showing the mysterious technology gravitates toward sexual reproductive organs, such as the testicles and ovaries.

    More research is needed, but Dr. Lee believes the nanobots may have the same infertility effect as microplastics found in testicles.

    Join @DrPaulMarik
    𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐒 𝐅𝐎𝐔𝐍𝐃 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐏𝐄𝐑𝐌 𝟐 𝐘𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐒 𝐀𝐅𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐀𝐗𝐗 A South Korean research team analyzing semen samples from a healthy man who took 3 doses of the Pfizer shot in 2022 has discovered nanobots living amongst his sperm. Dr. Young Mi Lee and her team identified 17 separate “self assembling entities” inside the sperm sample, isolated in saline, and analyzed in a nationally certified IVF clinic. This means the nanobots survived and grew for more than 2 years inside his body, without causing any noticeable side effects. Dr. Lee has observed that the nanobots grew better in sperm than blood, showing the mysterious technology gravitates toward sexual reproductive organs, such as the testicles and ovaries. More research is needed, but Dr. Lee believes the nanobots may have the same infertility effect as microplastics found in testicles. Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 3K Views 0 0 Reviews
  • Our Microplastics Moment
    Dr. Syed HaiderJun 1
    Microplastics found in every male testicle : r/Damnthatsinteresting
    A recent study showed microplastics in every male testicle tested. Of course they are in every organ, and affect everyone’s health.

    It’s probably possible to slowly remove them with things like blood/plasma donation, but it’s also important to slow down intake as much as possible.

    So no plastic food or drink containers. But water quality is an under-appreciated issue. City water is full of toxins including microplastics (all the pipes are plastic), but even home filtration systems don’t always solve this issue.

    Reverse osmosis filters are used by many and they don’t work for this - they can actually add micro plastics to the water they produce since every piece of the unit is made from plastic.

    Gravity filtration systems like Berkey do remove plastics and as an added bonus retain important ionic minerals, that are also removed by reverse osmosis.

    https://blog.mygotodoc.com/p/our-microplastics-moment/comments
    Our Microplastics Moment Dr. Syed HaiderJun 1 Microplastics found in every male testicle : r/Damnthatsinteresting A recent study showed microplastics in every male testicle tested. Of course they are in every organ, and affect everyone’s health. It’s probably possible to slowly remove them with things like blood/plasma donation, but it’s also important to slow down intake as much as possible. So no plastic food or drink containers. But water quality is an under-appreciated issue. City water is full of toxins including microplastics (all the pipes are plastic), but even home filtration systems don’t always solve this issue. Reverse osmosis filters are used by many and they don’t work for this - they can actually add micro plastics to the water they produce since every piece of the unit is made from plastic. Gravity filtration systems like Berkey do remove plastics and as an added bonus retain important ionic minerals, that are also removed by reverse osmosis. https://blog.mygotodoc.com/p/our-microplastics-moment/comments
    BLOG.MYGOTODOC.COM
    Our Microplastics Moment
    A recent study showed microplastics in every male testicle tested.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 3K Views 0 Reviews
  • The Deepest Detox is The Last Mile
    If you're feeling healthy, this is how to stay that way in a modern toxin riddled environment

    Dr. Syed Haider
    What to know about climbing Mount Everest
    The toxins our industrialized societies produce have reached everywhere on earth, from the fish in the depths of the ocean to the deepest Amazon jungle tribespeople, from our reproductive organs to the very wombs within which future generations gestate.

    These toxins destroy us from the inside out, yet they are incredibly difficult to get out.

    Detox protocols are a dime a dozen.

    The problem with most detox protocols is they don’t go far enough.

    You take a few drops of zeolite, or a few capsules of bentonite clay and call it a day.

    Or you just address the last straw that broke the camel's back, like spike protein, and leave all the rest piled up from many years of living in our sadly polluted ecosystem.

    Other protocols probably work to some extent based on changes as measured by symptoms, or by the best available testing.

    But symptoms can recede while leaving the root cause behind to rear its ugly head another day.

    And testing methodologies are so bad that those who rely on them are basically treating a test that is a poor representation of reality and ignoring the first principle of medicine you learn after med school, when your real education begins:

    Treat the patient, not the test.

    Which gets us back to the quandary: if symptoms and disease can recede only to come back later, how can you really know the problem is completely resolved at the deepest levels and not just laying in wait, biding its time?

    The answer is to find patients motivated enough and a practitioner skilled enough that the path to healing doesn’t involve any easy shortcuts. No covering up of symptoms, no half measures.

    Once the symptoms are gone, and the cause is uprooted, true resilience is restored and then the healing protocol can be tapered off without illness returning. At the same time the patient should feel better than they ever knew was possible, because that monkey they’ve been carrying on their back without knowing it for so long, is finally gone.

    Thank you for reading Dr. Syed Haider. This post is public so feel free to share it.

    Share

    Most alternative, functional/comprehensive/wholistic protocols go part way, they deal with superficial layers like “inflammation”, spike protein, Lyme, mold, etc. Instead of not only dealing with those, but also dealing with what led to those problems in the first place.

    It’s not that the practitioners are unaware of the deepest layers, it’s usually that the patients are unwilling to go there, because deep change is hard.

    But staring death in the face is great motivation, especially when there is no easy way out.

    Stage 4 cancer, months or weeks left to live, the only mainstream options are far too expensive to even be remotely possible. There is no insurance. There is no safety net.

    This is the situation for the poorest patients on the planet living with terminal illnesses in third world countries.

    Almost exclusively those were the only patients my colleague Hakim Shabaz Ahmed dealt with for years.

    If they had had any other option they would have taken it. If he had been any other doctor he would have relented and given them an easier path to walk.

    But he stood firm on the principle that half measures avail you nothing when dealing with the Final Boss, the Emperor of Maladies, stage 4 metastatic cancer that will eat you up bit by bit until it finally takes your life in one last, inherently insane, kamikaze attack that wipes out the very ground of being the cancer itself depends on to grow in the first place: you yourself.

    Thank you for reading Dr. Syed Haider. This post is public so feel free to share it.

    Share

    In the early days his patients did everything he recommended and went into remission, but the cancer wasn’t actually entirely gone, it was just held in check.

    When some patients went back to their bad old ways (like fast food, smoking, etc) the cancer came roaring right back, usually even worse than the first time around.

    The problem had not been thoroughly uprooted and real resilience had not been regained. The beast had just been asleep for a time waiting for the right moment.

    That’s when he went deeper, and discovered that the remission of cancer, or any illness, is just the first phase of real healing, during which patients have to stop the influx of toxins, but can’t yet trigger the release of all the toxic residues that have built up over their lives and were the creative force behind the problem in the first place.


    It’s not that detox wasn’t involved before, it just hadn’t been thorough enough. It was the superficial kind you find most practitioners recommending, the easier kind. The kind Dr Google might recommend from one of the approved alternative medicine outlets.

    This protocol is the real deal phase 2, after which the illness isn’t just beaten back, held in check, but truly resolved at the deepest levels, by pulling out the physical taproot so it can’t grow back.

    This is a clinically proven detox methodology that pulls toxins from deep within and expels them from everywhere: mostly into your gut, but they can also be mobilized out of your kidneys, lungs and skin.

    One patient shed plastic straight out of the pores of his testicles, and the thick plasticky substance had to be repeatedly peeled off his red, swollen, tender and inflamed testicles for days.

    If that sounds uncomfortable it’s because:

    It. Was. Very. Painful.

    That happened after a month of doing this protocol every day.


    Detox isn’t fast, it isn’t pretty and it’s not for the faint of heart.

    It’s for those willing to go where few have gone before and bear the consequences … because the benefits are so phenomenal.

    The detox reactions on the way can look like almost any illness you can imagine, the worst ones I’ve seen put people into the hospital, and get the conventional doctors frantically recommending steroids, or antibiotics or even surgeries.

    I was in the hospital myself with someone for weeks resisting the surgeon's overtures and providing support and encouragement to push through the extreme pain and discomfort they were experiencing.

    After getting through those interminable weeks of pain, everything changed, and that person now feels better than they ever have in their life. They not only cured their cancer, but they did it the right way. The way that addresses the real underlying root causes creating severe cellular stress that gave birth to the cancer in the first place. The way that won’t come back to bite them in 5 or 10 or 20 years because they left the root cause toxicity unresolved.

    The road less traveled. The journey few can tolerate.

    The Road Less Traveled - Christian Minimalism
    This protocol doesn’t belong at the beginning of a deep healing journey, because when the body is sick it can’t tolerate this level of toxin removal, it’s too weak to expel toxins even if they were mobilized.

    So this is not meant for someone who’s really sick, it’s meant for someone who is feeling generally well already.

    So if chronic illness is where you’re at, first you need to get to the point where you’ve overcome many if not all of the symptoms, cleaned up your diet, lifestyle, opened up your detox pathways (e.g. regular bowel movements), supported your body, and only then can you embark on the last leg of the journey to the deepest levels of healing, which can not only trigger a profound physical reset, but a psychological, emotional and spiritual one as well.

    If you are ready, this is the way.

    Like cresting Everest you should bring a guide.

    DEEP DETOX

    Disclaimer: This is intended for generally healthy individuals and should not be attempted by those who are sick or experiencing illness. This regimen should be accompanied by a healthy diet and avoidance of further toxic exposures. Consult an experienced health professional before attempting this. Take it slow. Try a day then skip a few days and see how you feel before attempting this many days in a row. If you start detoxing heavily you can stop the protocol until things calm down.

    This protocol should provide a thorough cleansing and detoxification experience, helping to remove all toxins from your body, including heavy metals, pesticides, biotoxins, difficult to mobilize forever chemicals and microplastics.

    A comprehensive care plan from a skilled practitioner may include other detox methodologies before and after this one, or may even dispense with this particular approach outlined here altogether depending on the specifics of a patient’s case.

    There is no one size fits all approach, everyone is truly unique, even identical twins, and every illness, even if it carries the same name, is different in different people.

    Warning Images – Browse 2,210,247 Stock ...
    Precautions:

    It bears repeating: do not try this if you are acutely or chronically ill.

    Patch Test: Before trying this perform a patch test with bentonite clay and castor oil on a small area of skin to check for allergic reactions.

    Avoid Overuse of TSP: Trisodium phosphate is a strong chemical and should be used sparingly. Excessive use can lead to skin irritation. If your skin gets irritated with the recommended dose, lower it. Consider starting at half the dose or less if you are sensitive.

    Stay Hydrated: Epsom salt baths can dehydrate you, so ensure you drink plenty of fluids every day you do this.

    Skin Sensitivity: If you have sensitive skin or any skin conditions, consult a healthcare professional before trying this routine.

    This is information is not meant to be spread around the internet willy nilly, so the actual protocol is hidden behind a paywall, which will prevent search engines from accessing it, however if you are not a paid subscriber and need to receive access without paying, just ask and it will be provided.

    The best way to request free access is by emailing [email protected], rather than leaving a reply on the blog or replying to the email in which this post was sent.

    https://blog.mygotodoc.com/p/the-deepest-detox-is-the-last-mile
    The Deepest Detox is The Last Mile If you're feeling healthy, this is how to stay that way in a modern toxin riddled environment Dr. Syed Haider What to know about climbing Mount Everest The toxins our industrialized societies produce have reached everywhere on earth, from the fish in the depths of the ocean to the deepest Amazon jungle tribespeople, from our reproductive organs to the very wombs within which future generations gestate. These toxins destroy us from the inside out, yet they are incredibly difficult to get out. Detox protocols are a dime a dozen. The problem with most detox protocols is they don’t go far enough. You take a few drops of zeolite, or a few capsules of bentonite clay and call it a day. Or you just address the last straw that broke the camel's back, like spike protein, and leave all the rest piled up from many years of living in our sadly polluted ecosystem. Other protocols probably work to some extent based on changes as measured by symptoms, or by the best available testing. But symptoms can recede while leaving the root cause behind to rear its ugly head another day. And testing methodologies are so bad that those who rely on them are basically treating a test that is a poor representation of reality and ignoring the first principle of medicine you learn after med school, when your real education begins: Treat the patient, not the test. Which gets us back to the quandary: if symptoms and disease can recede only to come back later, how can you really know the problem is completely resolved at the deepest levels and not just laying in wait, biding its time? The answer is to find patients motivated enough and a practitioner skilled enough that the path to healing doesn’t involve any easy shortcuts. No covering up of symptoms, no half measures. Once the symptoms are gone, and the cause is uprooted, true resilience is restored and then the healing protocol can be tapered off without illness returning. At the same time the patient should feel better than they ever knew was possible, because that monkey they’ve been carrying on their back without knowing it for so long, is finally gone. Thank you for reading Dr. Syed Haider. This post is public so feel free to share it. Share Most alternative, functional/comprehensive/wholistic protocols go part way, they deal with superficial layers like “inflammation”, spike protein, Lyme, mold, etc. Instead of not only dealing with those, but also dealing with what led to those problems in the first place. It’s not that the practitioners are unaware of the deepest layers, it’s usually that the patients are unwilling to go there, because deep change is hard. But staring death in the face is great motivation, especially when there is no easy way out. Stage 4 cancer, months or weeks left to live, the only mainstream options are far too expensive to even be remotely possible. There is no insurance. There is no safety net. This is the situation for the poorest patients on the planet living with terminal illnesses in third world countries. Almost exclusively those were the only patients my colleague Hakim Shabaz Ahmed dealt with for years. If they had had any other option they would have taken it. If he had been any other doctor he would have relented and given them an easier path to walk. But he stood firm on the principle that half measures avail you nothing when dealing with the Final Boss, the Emperor of Maladies, stage 4 metastatic cancer that will eat you up bit by bit until it finally takes your life in one last, inherently insane, kamikaze attack that wipes out the very ground of being the cancer itself depends on to grow in the first place: you yourself. Thank you for reading Dr. Syed Haider. This post is public so feel free to share it. Share In the early days his patients did everything he recommended and went into remission, but the cancer wasn’t actually entirely gone, it was just held in check. When some patients went back to their bad old ways (like fast food, smoking, etc) the cancer came roaring right back, usually even worse than the first time around. The problem had not been thoroughly uprooted and real resilience had not been regained. The beast had just been asleep for a time waiting for the right moment. That’s when he went deeper, and discovered that the remission of cancer, or any illness, is just the first phase of real healing, during which patients have to stop the influx of toxins, but can’t yet trigger the release of all the toxic residues that have built up over their lives and were the creative force behind the problem in the first place. It’s not that detox wasn’t involved before, it just hadn’t been thorough enough. It was the superficial kind you find most practitioners recommending, the easier kind. The kind Dr Google might recommend from one of the approved alternative medicine outlets. This protocol is the real deal phase 2, after which the illness isn’t just beaten back, held in check, but truly resolved at the deepest levels, by pulling out the physical taproot so it can’t grow back. This is a clinically proven detox methodology that pulls toxins from deep within and expels them from everywhere: mostly into your gut, but they can also be mobilized out of your kidneys, lungs and skin. One patient shed plastic straight out of the pores of his testicles, and the thick plasticky substance had to be repeatedly peeled off his red, swollen, tender and inflamed testicles for days. If that sounds uncomfortable it’s because: It. Was. Very. Painful. That happened after a month of doing this protocol every day. Detox isn’t fast, it isn’t pretty and it’s not for the faint of heart. It’s for those willing to go where few have gone before and bear the consequences … because the benefits are so phenomenal. The detox reactions on the way can look like almost any illness you can imagine, the worst ones I’ve seen put people into the hospital, and get the conventional doctors frantically recommending steroids, or antibiotics or even surgeries. I was in the hospital myself with someone for weeks resisting the surgeon's overtures and providing support and encouragement to push through the extreme pain and discomfort they were experiencing. After getting through those interminable weeks of pain, everything changed, and that person now feels better than they ever have in their life. They not only cured their cancer, but they did it the right way. The way that addresses the real underlying root causes creating severe cellular stress that gave birth to the cancer in the first place. The way that won’t come back to bite them in 5 or 10 or 20 years because they left the root cause toxicity unresolved. The road less traveled. The journey few can tolerate. The Road Less Traveled - Christian Minimalism This protocol doesn’t belong at the beginning of a deep healing journey, because when the body is sick it can’t tolerate this level of toxin removal, it’s too weak to expel toxins even if they were mobilized. So this is not meant for someone who’s really sick, it’s meant for someone who is feeling generally well already. So if chronic illness is where you’re at, first you need to get to the point where you’ve overcome many if not all of the symptoms, cleaned up your diet, lifestyle, opened up your detox pathways (e.g. regular bowel movements), supported your body, and only then can you embark on the last leg of the journey to the deepest levels of healing, which can not only trigger a profound physical reset, but a psychological, emotional and spiritual one as well. If you are ready, this is the way. Like cresting Everest you should bring a guide. DEEP DETOX Disclaimer: This is intended for generally healthy individuals and should not be attempted by those who are sick or experiencing illness. This regimen should be accompanied by a healthy diet and avoidance of further toxic exposures. Consult an experienced health professional before attempting this. Take it slow. Try a day then skip a few days and see how you feel before attempting this many days in a row. If you start detoxing heavily you can stop the protocol until things calm down. This protocol should provide a thorough cleansing and detoxification experience, helping to remove all toxins from your body, including heavy metals, pesticides, biotoxins, difficult to mobilize forever chemicals and microplastics. A comprehensive care plan from a skilled practitioner may include other detox methodologies before and after this one, or may even dispense with this particular approach outlined here altogether depending on the specifics of a patient’s case. There is no one size fits all approach, everyone is truly unique, even identical twins, and every illness, even if it carries the same name, is different in different people. Warning Images – Browse 2,210,247 Stock ... Precautions: It bears repeating: do not try this if you are acutely or chronically ill. Patch Test: Before trying this perform a patch test with bentonite clay and castor oil on a small area of skin to check for allergic reactions. Avoid Overuse of TSP: Trisodium phosphate is a strong chemical and should be used sparingly. Excessive use can lead to skin irritation. If your skin gets irritated with the recommended dose, lower it. Consider starting at half the dose or less if you are sensitive. Stay Hydrated: Epsom salt baths can dehydrate you, so ensure you drink plenty of fluids every day you do this. Skin Sensitivity: If you have sensitive skin or any skin conditions, consult a healthcare professional before trying this routine. This is information is not meant to be spread around the internet willy nilly, so the actual protocol is hidden behind a paywall, which will prevent search engines from accessing it, however if you are not a paid subscriber and need to receive access without paying, just ask and it will be provided. The best way to request free access is by emailing [email protected], rather than leaving a reply on the blog or replying to the email in which this post was sent. https://blog.mygotodoc.com/p/the-deepest-detox-is-the-last-mile
    BLOG.MYGOTODOC.COM
    The Deepest Detox is The Last Mile
    If you're feeling healthy, this is how to stay that way in a modern toxin riddled environment
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 15K Views 0 Reviews
  • EDTA Snakeoil! Ana Maria Mihalcea's Medical Malfeasance Exposed
    “I already have had.. uh.. patients die from shedding” - Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D.

    Dr. Ariyana Love (ND)
    “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” ~ Hosea 4:6 KJV

    Rockefeller Medicine

    Around 1900, the science world was getting excited about new “petrochemicals” and the ability to create a variety of new compounds from oil. Some of the first products derived from petrochemicals were plastics.

    In 1908, modern medicine was established by the Rockefeller’s and dubbed “Allopathy”. The Rockefeller’s created the business of modern medicine which has always been about poisoning people, Eustice Mullen explains.

    This is the definition of Allopathic medicine according to the NIH:

    “A system in which medical doctors and other health care professionals (such as nurses, pharmacists, and therapists) treat symptoms and diseases using drugs, radiation, or surgery.”

    The Rockefeller Institute for Medicine, founded in 1908, marked the advent of the re-creation of synthetic versions of natural cures. Prior to 1908, every place of healing in America, Europe and the world, used only ancient traditional natural medicinal cures. Every hospital was a “Homeopathic Hospital”. Most of these magnificent buildings were converted into mental health asylums where a system of torture and electric shock was established to “cure” mental illness.


    John D. Rockefeller created the oil industry and used it to crush traditional medicine in order to enslave people. They also financed the Eugenics movement. One of the perks of modern medicine is depopulation.

    “Everyone knows that the infamous Roe v. Wade opinion legalized abortion, but almost no one knows that legal abortion was a strategy by eugenicists, as early as 1939, to “genetically improve” the population by “reducing” it.”

    In the book, “Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America”, authored by E. Richard Brown, he tells the hidden story of the financial, political, and institutional manipulations whereby a diverse and eclectic range of traditional healing modalities available to the North American public was summarily canceled and pared down to a singular style of medicine that would become the predominant medicine of the Western world and a major force in global medical culture during the 20th century. This was brought about largely by the collaboration of the American Medical Association, the philanthropies of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and the development of a revolutionary curriculum by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Brown documents the story of how a powerful professional elite gained virtual hegemony in the Western theatre of healing by effectively taking control of the ethos and practice of Western medicine. E. Richard Brown describes how, in 1905, the American Medical Association’s new Council on Medical Education funded by Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced serious activity. They employed the services of Abraham Flexner who proceeded to visit and “assess” every single medical school in the US and Canada. Within a short time of this development, medical schools all around the US began to collapse or consolidate. By 1910, 30 schools had merged, and 21 had closed their doors. Of the 166 medical schools operating in 1904, 133 had survived by 1910, and 104 by 1915. Fifteen years later, only 76 schools of medicine existed in the US and they all followed the same curriculum.

    The 1910 Flexner Report laid the foundations of the modern medical system, dubbed “Rockefeller medicine” (Allopathy). Since 1910, corporate interests have established near total control of the medical field, both though pharmacology and through their impact on medical education.

    In 1935, vitamin C became the first vitamin to be artificially synthesized in Switzerland. Rockefeller saw a big opportunity with the possibility that vitamins and medications could be developed from petroleum. He saw the chance to control and monopolize multiple industries at once: petroleum, chemical and medical. Petrochemicals were ideal from a business perspective because they could be patented, owned and sold for high profits.

    Today, the petrochemicals in plastics are causing a slew of illnesses including neurodevelopmental disorders, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer, which have increased between 28% and 150% between 1990 and 2019. Petrochemicals in microplastics are also rapidly reducing fertility in males in particular, and polluting our environment. Please also read more here, here, and here.

    The first pharmaceutical drug was an arsenic named Salvarsan. That’s right, an ARSENIC!

    DEATH is an all-to-common side effect of pharmaceutical drugs which is only logical when you administer poisons internally. The following pages demonstrate the many deaths of people around the world, most of them children, who were fatally poisoned during the first mass medication experiments with Rockefeller’s Allopathic health. The paper is entitled, Toward Responsibility in International Health: Death following Treatment in Rockefeller Hookworm Campaigns, 1914–1934.

    What is EDTA?

    EDTA is synthesized on an industrial scale using 1, 2-diaminoethane (ethylene diamine), formaldehyde, water and sodium cyanide.

    Ethylene diamine induced acute and subchronic toxicity in lab animals, also allergic hypersensitivity. The liver and kidneys are target organs of ethylenediamine, where they simply stop working.


    Read more: Is C60 And EDTA Safe? Clinical Review


    Absorption of large amounts of formaldehyde via any route can cause severe systemic toxicity, leading to metabolic acidosis, tissue and organ damage, and coma, according to the CDC.

    Exposure to sodium cyanide can be rapidly fatal. It has whole-body (systemic) effects, particularly affecting those organ systems most sensitive to low oxygen levels: the central nervous system (brain), the cardiovascular system (heart and blood vessels), and the pulmonary system (lungs), according to the CDC.

    EDTA is an industrial poison. The textile industry required a chelating agent to remove calcium during textile processing and this led to the synthesis of polyamino-carboxylic acids, one of which was EDTA. A patent was filed for EDTA in Germany in 1935, for industrial chemical use. EDTA is a synthetic acid effectively used to clean boiler rooms in nuclear power plants. In 1945, Franz Munz obtained a US EDTA patent in 1945. In 1947, EDTA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a food additive in “low doses” because it’s a forever chemical and a preservative.

    There are two different types of EDTA approved by the U.S. FDA. In 1953, Edetate calcium disodium also known as Calcium EDTA (marketed under the trade name Calcium Disodium Versenate registered ) was approved for the treatment of lead poisoning. Three years later, in 1956, a related EDTA compound, Edetate disodium, was also approved for clinical use. This compound, also known as Disodium EDTA, has been marketed under the trade names Disotate (registered) and Endrate (registered). The essential difference between these two compounds is that Calcium EDTA's structure has an incorporated Ca super(2+) moiety while Disodium EDTA does not. The use of the latter compound, Disodium EDTA, has been associated with life-threatening and fatal hypocalcemia.

    EDTA trial DEATHS

    An EDTA trial (Sloth-Nielsen et al., 1981) on the possible antiatherogenic effect of EDTA with 6 patients, showed clinical signs of potentially lethal hypocalcemia from abnormally low calcium levels caused by EDTA.

    Another EDTA chelation human trial in 2003-2005 resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia.

    A 2006 EDTA chelation trial also resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia.

    There were several DEATHS reported from cardiac arrest due to lethal hypocalcemia in EDTA trials in 2006 and 2008 and (Brown, Willis, Omalu, & Leiker, 2006; Baxter & Krenzelok, 2008), from calcium deficiency inducing alterations in the brain, and osteoporosis, which causes the bones to become brittle.

    In 2008, a clinical trial with EDTA chelation on autistic children also proved fatal, resulting in DEATHS of children.

    A 2007 EDTA chelation study proved KIDNEY FAILURE in humans.

    Decades of clinical studies demonstrate that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects, as Science Direct explained in 2016.

    “It should be emphasized that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects.

    EDTA for cardiovascular disease DEBUNKED

    Many Allopathic specialists tried to popularize the use of EDTA for chelation, to no avail. In the 1980s, Richard Casdorph, a practicing cardiologist, claimed improvements in ejection fractions of the heart and in cerebral blood flow with EDTA chelation therapy in several articles. McDonagh, Rudolph, and Cheraskin published about 30 articles documenting various positive effects of EDTA chelation. This group wrote articles showing no problems with kidney function in patients treated with EDTA according to the published protocol. At the same time, conventional cardiologists wrote several editorials against EDTA chelation. So the American Medical Association called for studies to see if chelation worked. The American Board of Chelation Therapy in 1983 was formed to certify doctors who give the therapy. It was later called the American Board of Clinical Metal Toxicology. ACAM also certified doctors who took its workshop on chelation therapy and passed its written and oral examinations. The Great Lakes College of Clinical Medicine, later called the International College of Integrative Medicine (ICIM), was formed in 1983 to teach and do research on chelation and other integrative therapies. After complex negotiations, in the late 1980's Walter Reed Army Hospital agreed to do a randomized clinical trial on EDTA chelation therapy, but part way through the study it was suddenly discontinued for unknown reasons.

    However, in a paper by Seely, Wu, and Mills, (2005), a systematic review of published articles in this field was undertaken. The authors concluded that the best current available evidence did not support the therapeutic use of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Similar results have been reported in review papers by Shrihari, Roy, Prabhakaran, and Reddy (2006) and Crisponi et al. (2015).

    While a 2002 EDTA large randomized clinical trial “showed benefit”, smaller studies were inconsistent.

    In the 1990s, the Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against ACAM for making a claim in a brochure that chelation was effective for vascular disease. ACAM submitted almost 100 articles in support of the claim, but the FTC insisted that a large randomized trial was required to make that claim. ACAM finally gave up after spending a million dollars in legal fees and signed a consent order saying they would not make such a claim anymore, based on the evidence at that time.

    In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up.

    A slew of other adverse events such as lacrimation, nasal congestion, mucocutaneous lesions, glycosuria, hypotension, and ECG abnormalities (DISEASE OF THE HEART AND LUNGS) have also been reported as well as allergic reactions (Wax, 2013) to EDTA. Prolonged treatment with calcium EDTA gives rise to depletion of magnesium and trace-metal depletion, the most marked being due to the excretion of zinc. Zinc depletion destroys your cells’ ability to absorb nutrients and leads to diabetes.

    A 2015 study entitled, Quality of Life Outcomes with a Disodium EDTA Chelation Regimen for Coronary Disease: Results from the TACT Randomized Trial concluded with this statement:

    “In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up.”

    Severe kidney damage from EDTA chelation therapy was reported in a (Nissel 1986) trial. In a very short period of time, EDTA causes kidneys to shut down in complete failure.

    A study from 2015 suggests EDTA chelation for myocardial infarction with “modest” benefits to cardio health. However, I would suggest that the moderate benefits of this study were due to the high doses of vitamin C administered.

    A 2017 study on EDTA chelation for atherosclerosis and Miocardial Infraction concluded:

    “Unsubstantiated claims of chelation therapy as an effective treatment of atherosclerosis should be avoided and patients made aware of the inadequate evidence for efficacy and potential adverse effects, especially the harm that can occur if used as a substitute for proven therapies.”

    In a 2018 EDTA trial it was concluded:

    “These results… are not sufficient to support the routine use of chelation therapy for treatment of patients who have had an MI (Miocardial Infraction)”.

    A study from 2023 entitled, Chelation Therapy Associated with Antioxidant Supplementation Can Decrease Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis: Preliminary Results proved a flop with two participants discontinuing their trial participation.

    EDTA for lead poisoning DEBUNKED

    EDTA has also been touted as a treatment for lead poisoning. Because of its adverse effects, calcium EDTA was replaced by DMSA in the treatment of lead poisoning (Aposhian et al., 1995) in 1995. CaEDTA has also been used for the treatment of cases with manganese toxicity, but the result was neurotoxic symptoms resembling PARKINSONISM (Andersen, 1999).

    A 2004 trial showed that EDTA actually REDISTRIBUTES LEAD TO THE BRAIN after acute or chronic lead exposure (Andersen, 2004).

    Another trial proved adverse effects in 5 patients receiving EDTA at an outpatient chelation clinic in 2002, and all patients experienced gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal symptoms.

    Oral exposure to EDTA (2002) had produced adverse reproductive and developmental effects in animals. EDTA did not make it past the animal or human trials, so why are medical doctors using it in humans?

    A 2002 EDTA trial was performed on humans as a test for “chelation” therapy by a chelation clinic, demonstrating adverse events in 5 out of 5 patients.

    Additionally, EDTA is a persistent organic pollutant (POP). In that case, each intake would only be partially excreted, while the remaining chemicals build up in the body and produce cell death. And long-term exposure to calcium disodium EDTA creates toxicity and kidney damage.

    EDTA Snakeoil Salesmen

    In March 2023, Ana Maria Mihalcea interviewed Dr. Michael Roth who claims that EDTA is a “synthetic amino acid related to vinegar.” Together they make a slew of medical claims that are not scientifically proven, such as that EDTA “detoxifies covid vaccine, heavy metals, graphene oxide, parasites, hydrogels, and nanoparticles”.

    The only scientific tool Ana Maria uses to back her claims is dark field microscopy. You cannot see nanoparticles with a dark field microscope. It takes a spectroscopy microscope to identify nanoparticles. Her medical claims are simply fabricated and unscientific lies.

    Ana Maria and Dr. Ross made additional unproven medical statements that “EDTA removes the effects of a heart attack, can bring back the elderly from senility and Alzheimer’s, reduces blood pressure, detoxifies several snake and spider venoms, lowers insulin, smooths skin and wrinkles, ” and a host of other laughable health claims that aren’t backed by anything.

    Incidentally, Dr. Ross is now dead.

    “Dr. Roth sadly passed away on March 11/2023”


    My sources informed me that Dr. Rashid Buttar was using EDTA. Given that he was already severely poisoned as Stew Peter’s reported, using EDTA Acid would have been enough to tip him over the edge and kill him.

    EDTA is not an approved pharmaceutical drug. It was Covid Emergency approved by the FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), just like the modified RNA (modRNA) Covid-19 vaccine nanotechnology.

    The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (.gov) makes it clear that the use of EDTA chelation for heart disease has not been approved by the FDA.

    Ana Maria has been touting EDTA as an “antioxidant” when it is not. She even published to her Substack that EDTA is an “Antioxidant” when in fact it’s an acid poison and an oxidant. Many people saw it on her Substack before she removed it.

    I’ve had over a dozen clients come to me extremely sick from EDTA pills and EDTA IV infusion. Some told me they thought it was a natural substance due to Ana Maria’s false advertising and medical malfeasance. A Medical Doctor is licensed to know wether EDTA Acid is an oxidant poison or an antioxidant. Not knowing this and inducing the death of a patient is not an acceptable excuse. Ana Maria is criminally liable.


    EDTA is an oxidant when used internally. The studies that refer to EDTA as an “antioxidant” are in vitro lab studies, not in vivo (inside the body).

    EDTA is used to preserve cell specimens for chemistry lab work because it prevents blood coagulation and oxidation of cells in a petri dish where it’s used for diagnostic purposes. This is the kind of “antioxidant” the studies are referring to. But when you infuse EDTA Acid into the human body, it acts as an oxidant poison.

    EDTA also will not decoagulate the blood in vivo (inside the body). But I can see how people who cannot read peer-reviewed literature could be deceived and manipulated by snake oil salesmen.

    For example, a study entitled, “Comparative study of the antioxidant capability of EDTA and Irganox”. EDTA is a preservative used in laboratories to preserve cells for scientific lab research. EDTA prevents the oxidation of cells in a petri dish. Oxygen causes cells to deteriorate, but labs need them to last longer for research purposes. When used inside the human body (in vivo), it’s a different story. Then EDTA acts as an oxidant poison, not an antioxidant. So this has a very different meaning.

    One of the well documented and widely known adverse events from EDTA “chelation” is DEATH, according to Mount Sinai.

    Other serious side effects that have been reported include low blood sugar, diminished calcium levels, headache, nausea, dangerously low blood pressure, kidney failure, organ damage, irregular heartbeat, seizures, or even death.

    I have to wonder if Ana Maria Mihalcea is informing her patients that death is a potential adverse event to EDTA chelation? In a March 24, 2024, broadcast that Ana Maria released, at the 53:24 minute mark, she makes a chilling confession:

    “I already have had… uh… patients die from the shedding”

    How many of Ana Maria Mihalcea’s patients have been killed by her EDTA infusion protocol? I was horrified when I heard Ana Maria’s confession because I haven’t had any clients die from shedding! I’ve treated many people who were extremely sick from shedding, and I helped them all to detox effectively. Some clients came to me after several hospitalizations from extreme shedding but none of them died in my care! Nobody needs to die from shedding if they use an effective detox protocol.

    Between 1-2 years, Ana Maria has been claiming that EDTA detoxes graphene, dissolves graphene and chelates heavy metals, but experts such as Dr. Robert Young and Dr. Judy Mikovitz told me this is impossible.

    Ana Maria has gone so far as to produce a medical study with unscientific claims right in the title, “EDTA Chelation Dissolves the Artificial Intelligence Magnetic Hydrogel Weapon”. The study was also promoted by Health Canada. In her study, Ana Maria claims that EDTA can “detoxify the body even from Graphene”.

    EDTA is not a detox agent! Again, it’s an oxidant that degrades cells whereas genuine antioxidants repair cells.

    Ana Maria does in fact know about oxidant poisons. In an interview from December 2022, she referred to graphene as an oxidant. At least she’s correct about something.

    Saul Green, Ph.D., and Wallace I. Sampson, M.D. wrote in great detail about the Implausibility of EDTA Chelation Therapy, stating:

    “EDTA chelation effectiveness is implausible; (2) the preponderance of evidence shows ineffectiveness; and (3) EDTA augments oxidative reactions involving iron instead of inhibiting them, resulting in increased likelihood of production of oxygen free radicals rather than neutralization of them, as claimed.”

    EDTA a precurser to cellular transfection

    The Rockefeller Institue of Medicine has done clinical research on EDTA. One particular study entitled, Studies of Cell Deformity from 1967, shows that cells will degrade from EDTA exposure, which also induces “deformation” on their surfaces. The trial demonstrated that EDTA stops cellular synthesis of calcium. They learned that calcium is bound to anionic sites at the cell periphery, some of which are located at the cellular electrokinetic surface.

    Due to Rockefeller’s research, EDTA is now used in electrophoresis which is a laboratory technique used to separate DNA, RNA or protein molecules based on their size and electrical charge. An electric current is used to move the molecules through a gel or other matrix, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute.

    In agarose gel electrophoresis, EDTA is added for chelating the magnesium ions which are cofactors for DNA nucleases. Hence, activity of DNA nucleases that may be present is inhibited, and “DNA is protected from degrading”. This is why EDTA is an effective transfection agent because it dissolves parts of your DNA, preserving cells for lab research in vitro.

    Gel electrophoresis using EDTA is routinely used for detection and size analysis of proteins and nucleic acid. DMSO is used with EDTA in this process. This destruction of cells makes transfection (gene editing) of cells easier using CRISPR-Cas9 which splices and dices the genome in vivo, as this study explains entitled, “Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex assembly by anti-CRISPR AcrIIC2”.


    EDTA was found to be genotoxic in laboratory animals. A study from 1983 demonstrates that EDTA induces gene mutations and chromosomal breakage, meaning that genetic mutations will be passed on your offspring, affecting generations to come, according to this Genetic Toxicology of EDTA study from 1983.

    Calcium chelate of EDTA (CaEDTA) “chelation” has shown teratogenic effects (Catsch & Harmuth-Hoene, 1976), which are central nervous system depression and peripheral neuropathy. EDTA produced abnormalities in pups of rats removed by cesarian section on day 21 of the study. Increases in several abnormalities (cleft palate, adactyly or syndactyly, abnormal rib or abnormal vertebrae) were observed with increased doses of CaEDTA.

    EDTA improves transfection of embryonic stem cells lines (hESC) in cells, according to the NIH.

    According to a peer reviewed paper from the NIH, EDTA is a precursor to cellular transfection.

    “We found that chemically abrading the differentiated CACO-2 human intestinal epithelial cell layer by a trypsin and EDTA pretreatment (before the use of detergent-like transfection reagents) dramatically improved transfection efficiency in this polar, differentiated model. Although this treatment did improve the transfection efficiency, it also induced leakiness in the epithelial barrier by both opening tight junctional complexes and by creating holes in the cell layer because of low-level cell death and detachment. Thus, this approach to enhance the transfection efficiency of polar, differentiated cells will be useful for assessment of the effect of the transfected/expressed protein on (re)formation of an epithelial barrier..."

    Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Fetal Bovine Serum for human transfection also uses EDTA.


    An NIH study entitled, “Kinetic Basis for DNA Target Specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a” reveals that EDTA enables rapid binding to DNA during gene editing (transfection).

    Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” explains:

    “CAS12a is an RNA-guided, programmable genome editing enzyme found within bacterial adaptive immune pathways. Unlike CRISPR-Cas9, Cas12a uses only a single catalytic site to both cleave target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) (cis-activity) and indiscriminately degrade single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (trans-activity).”

    According to the study, “A DNA loading buffer of 45% formamide and 15 mM EDTA, with a trace amount of xylene cyanol and bromophenol blue…” is used to transfect the human genome.

    So, EDTA is a transfection agent used with CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the human genome. Does EDTA actually dissolve graphene, as Ana Maria claims? The answer is NO! EDTA oxidant is used to reduce graphene to Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) form. Graphene is reduced by oxidation. Rather than dissolving graphene, EDTA reduces it to Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles otherwise known as Quantum Dots.

    Graphene oxide is more toxic than graphene, as I documented in my article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide”.

    I will emphasize again that Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots cannot be seen with a dark field microscope. So Ana Maria’s claims that EDTA is detoxing graphene from the human body is unscientific.

    EDTA chelation for graphene nanocomposites

    EDTA chelation is NOT effective in removing metals from the human body. It's actually a different kind of chelation that’s used to create electrochemical sensors (biosensors) when combined with GRAPHENE!

    EDTA serves as a connecting mediator between NiHCF (Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Nickle) and graphene nanosheets. EDTA is used with metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and quantum dots to stabilize the technology for a more uniform distribution throughout the body.

    A Science Direct paper entitled, “Highly sensitive ascorbid acid sensors from EDTA chelation derived nickel hexacyanoferrate/graphene nanocomposites” reveals that EDTA is used to create Graphene/Nickel, AA sensor nanocomposites.

    “EDTA chelation stragey” is used for the “homogeneously distrubuted" NiHCF” (Nickel hexacyanoferrate composite) on graphene sheets. EDTA residue-supported pyramidal and spherical nanoparticles of NiHCF deposited on graphene sheets is used to create biosensors for the formation of Graphene/Nickel hydrogels.


    The graphene hydrogel nanocomposite sensors (Gr/NiHCF) are used as externally controlled biosensing tools. They tell us it’s used to test for ascorbic acid, but the application of this technology is for “human life” as well as for industrial use. See link here.


    Graphene oxide/Lauric acid nanoparticles are modified using EDTA. Lauric acid nanoparticles is suggested as a “prospective drug carrier” for oral nanoparticle-mediated sustained drug delivery (timed release technology) used for the removal of Pb(II) ions (lead). However, studies show there are cytotoxic results.

    Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” demonstrates how EDTA improves transfection and modification of the human genome.

    Once Graphene is reduced to Graphene Oxide, due to its small particulate size, you can no longer identify it using a Dark Field Microscope. Ana Maria is using a dark field scope, not a spectroscopy microscope, which is the only instrument that can measure GON and Quantum Dots.

    So what is Ana Maria doing with EDTA infusions? She’s creating a metal-EDTA complex that stabilizes and strengthens the graphene-based nanotech weapon system and enables it to spread more readily throughout the body, for human transfection. She uses “light and sound healing techniques” to activate the delayed release technology before administering EDTA infusion, as she reveals in an interview here.

    EDTA is a poison acid that dissolves DNA. It's used to prime the cells’ DNA for transfection. EDTA disrupts the surface of skin cells so that other chemicals can penetrate more easily and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology can work more efficiently.

    The NIH describes EDTA’s enhanced cellular transfection:

    “Flow cytometric analysis using an enhanced green fluorescent protein vector showed a significantly increased transfection efficiency of EDTA method compared to standard enzyme method. In addition, the EDTA approach maintained stable cell viability and recovery rate of hESCs after transfection.”

    Another study published in Research Gate, confirms that EDTA increases cellular transfection, along with using chloroquine.

    Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots (GOQD-HA) nanocomposite use EDTA for tissue-specific delivery of Metformin, an anti-diabetic drug otherwise known as insulin.


    Conclusion

    Beware of snakeoil salesmen! Never trust pharmaceuticals! Superior heavy metal chelation supplements exist such as ASEA redox molecules and Master Peace, sign up and order here. Medicines made from nature are always superior to pharmaceutical drugs. Finally, be sure your Naturopathic Doctor is competent!

    Schedule a health consultation with me for a customized detox protocol and complete cellular health restoration.

    https://substack.com/home/post/p-144979143
    EDTA Snakeoil! Ana Maria Mihalcea's Medical Malfeasance Exposed “I already have had.. uh.. patients die from shedding” - Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D. Dr. Ariyana Love (ND) “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” ~ Hosea 4:6 KJV Rockefeller Medicine Around 1900, the science world was getting excited about new “petrochemicals” and the ability to create a variety of new compounds from oil. Some of the first products derived from petrochemicals were plastics. In 1908, modern medicine was established by the Rockefeller’s and dubbed “Allopathy”. The Rockefeller’s created the business of modern medicine which has always been about poisoning people, Eustice Mullen explains. This is the definition of Allopathic medicine according to the NIH: “A system in which medical doctors and other health care professionals (such as nurses, pharmacists, and therapists) treat symptoms and diseases using drugs, radiation, or surgery.” The Rockefeller Institute for Medicine, founded in 1908, marked the advent of the re-creation of synthetic versions of natural cures. Prior to 1908, every place of healing in America, Europe and the world, used only ancient traditional natural medicinal cures. Every hospital was a “Homeopathic Hospital”. Most of these magnificent buildings were converted into mental health asylums where a system of torture and electric shock was established to “cure” mental illness. John D. Rockefeller created the oil industry and used it to crush traditional medicine in order to enslave people. They also financed the Eugenics movement. One of the perks of modern medicine is depopulation. “Everyone knows that the infamous Roe v. Wade opinion legalized abortion, but almost no one knows that legal abortion was a strategy by eugenicists, as early as 1939, to “genetically improve” the population by “reducing” it.” In the book, “Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America”, authored by E. Richard Brown, he tells the hidden story of the financial, political, and institutional manipulations whereby a diverse and eclectic range of traditional healing modalities available to the North American public was summarily canceled and pared down to a singular style of medicine that would become the predominant medicine of the Western world and a major force in global medical culture during the 20th century. This was brought about largely by the collaboration of the American Medical Association, the philanthropies of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, and the development of a revolutionary curriculum by the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Brown documents the story of how a powerful professional elite gained virtual hegemony in the Western theatre of healing by effectively taking control of the ethos and practice of Western medicine. E. Richard Brown describes how, in 1905, the American Medical Association’s new Council on Medical Education funded by Carnegie and Rockefeller commenced serious activity. They employed the services of Abraham Flexner who proceeded to visit and “assess” every single medical school in the US and Canada. Within a short time of this development, medical schools all around the US began to collapse or consolidate. By 1910, 30 schools had merged, and 21 had closed their doors. Of the 166 medical schools operating in 1904, 133 had survived by 1910, and 104 by 1915. Fifteen years later, only 76 schools of medicine existed in the US and they all followed the same curriculum. The 1910 Flexner Report laid the foundations of the modern medical system, dubbed “Rockefeller medicine” (Allopathy). Since 1910, corporate interests have established near total control of the medical field, both though pharmacology and through their impact on medical education. In 1935, vitamin C became the first vitamin to be artificially synthesized in Switzerland. Rockefeller saw a big opportunity with the possibility that vitamins and medications could be developed from petroleum. He saw the chance to control and monopolize multiple industries at once: petroleum, chemical and medical. Petrochemicals were ideal from a business perspective because they could be patented, owned and sold for high profits. Today, the petrochemicals in plastics are causing a slew of illnesses including neurodevelopmental disorders, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer, which have increased between 28% and 150% between 1990 and 2019. Petrochemicals in microplastics are also rapidly reducing fertility in males in particular, and polluting our environment. Please also read more here, here, and here. The first pharmaceutical drug was an arsenic named Salvarsan. That’s right, an ARSENIC! DEATH is an all-to-common side effect of pharmaceutical drugs which is only logical when you administer poisons internally. The following pages demonstrate the many deaths of people around the world, most of them children, who were fatally poisoned during the first mass medication experiments with Rockefeller’s Allopathic health. The paper is entitled, Toward Responsibility in International Health: Death following Treatment in Rockefeller Hookworm Campaigns, 1914–1934. What is EDTA? EDTA is synthesized on an industrial scale using 1, 2-diaminoethane (ethylene diamine), formaldehyde, water and sodium cyanide. Ethylene diamine induced acute and subchronic toxicity in lab animals, also allergic hypersensitivity. The liver and kidneys are target organs of ethylenediamine, where they simply stop working. Read more: Is C60 And EDTA Safe? Clinical Review Absorption of large amounts of formaldehyde via any route can cause severe systemic toxicity, leading to metabolic acidosis, tissue and organ damage, and coma, according to the CDC. Exposure to sodium cyanide can be rapidly fatal. It has whole-body (systemic) effects, particularly affecting those organ systems most sensitive to low oxygen levels: the central nervous system (brain), the cardiovascular system (heart and blood vessels), and the pulmonary system (lungs), according to the CDC. EDTA is an industrial poison. The textile industry required a chelating agent to remove calcium during textile processing and this led to the synthesis of polyamino-carboxylic acids, one of which was EDTA. A patent was filed for EDTA in Germany in 1935, for industrial chemical use. EDTA is a synthetic acid effectively used to clean boiler rooms in nuclear power plants. In 1945, Franz Munz obtained a US EDTA patent in 1945. In 1947, EDTA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a food additive in “low doses” because it’s a forever chemical and a preservative. There are two different types of EDTA approved by the U.S. FDA. In 1953, Edetate calcium disodium also known as Calcium EDTA (marketed under the trade name Calcium Disodium Versenate registered ) was approved for the treatment of lead poisoning. Three years later, in 1956, a related EDTA compound, Edetate disodium, was also approved for clinical use. This compound, also known as Disodium EDTA, has been marketed under the trade names Disotate (registered) and Endrate (registered). The essential difference between these two compounds is that Calcium EDTA's structure has an incorporated Ca super(2+) moiety while Disodium EDTA does not. The use of the latter compound, Disodium EDTA, has been associated with life-threatening and fatal hypocalcemia. EDTA trial DEATHS An EDTA trial (Sloth-Nielsen et al., 1981) on the possible antiatherogenic effect of EDTA with 6 patients, showed clinical signs of potentially lethal hypocalcemia from abnormally low calcium levels caused by EDTA. Another EDTA chelation human trial in 2003-2005 resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia. A 2006 EDTA chelation trial also resulted in DEATHS due to hypocalcemia. There were several DEATHS reported from cardiac arrest due to lethal hypocalcemia in EDTA trials in 2006 and 2008 and (Brown, Willis, Omalu, & Leiker, 2006; Baxter & Krenzelok, 2008), from calcium deficiency inducing alterations in the brain, and osteoporosis, which causes the bones to become brittle. In 2008, a clinical trial with EDTA chelation on autistic children also proved fatal, resulting in DEATHS of children. A 2007 EDTA chelation study proved KIDNEY FAILURE in humans. Decades of clinical studies demonstrate that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects, as Science Direct explained in 2016. “It should be emphasized that EDTA treatment is associated with severe, life-threatening adverse effects. EDTA for cardiovascular disease DEBUNKED Many Allopathic specialists tried to popularize the use of EDTA for chelation, to no avail. In the 1980s, Richard Casdorph, a practicing cardiologist, claimed improvements in ejection fractions of the heart and in cerebral blood flow with EDTA chelation therapy in several articles. McDonagh, Rudolph, and Cheraskin published about 30 articles documenting various positive effects of EDTA chelation. This group wrote articles showing no problems with kidney function in patients treated with EDTA according to the published protocol. At the same time, conventional cardiologists wrote several editorials against EDTA chelation. So the American Medical Association called for studies to see if chelation worked. The American Board of Chelation Therapy in 1983 was formed to certify doctors who give the therapy. It was later called the American Board of Clinical Metal Toxicology. ACAM also certified doctors who took its workshop on chelation therapy and passed its written and oral examinations. The Great Lakes College of Clinical Medicine, later called the International College of Integrative Medicine (ICIM), was formed in 1983 to teach and do research on chelation and other integrative therapies. After complex negotiations, in the late 1980's Walter Reed Army Hospital agreed to do a randomized clinical trial on EDTA chelation therapy, but part way through the study it was suddenly discontinued for unknown reasons. However, in a paper by Seely, Wu, and Mills, (2005), a systematic review of published articles in this field was undertaken. The authors concluded that the best current available evidence did not support the therapeutic use of EDTA chelation therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Similar results have been reported in review papers by Shrihari, Roy, Prabhakaran, and Reddy (2006) and Crisponi et al. (2015). While a 2002 EDTA large randomized clinical trial “showed benefit”, smaller studies were inconsistent. In the 1990s, the Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint against ACAM for making a claim in a brochure that chelation was effective for vascular disease. ACAM submitted almost 100 articles in support of the claim, but the FTC insisted that a large randomized trial was required to make that claim. ACAM finally gave up after spending a million dollars in legal fees and signed a consent order saying they would not make such a claim anymore, based on the evidence at that time. In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up. A slew of other adverse events such as lacrimation, nasal congestion, mucocutaneous lesions, glycosuria, hypotension, and ECG abnormalities (DISEASE OF THE HEART AND LUNGS) have also been reported as well as allergic reactions (Wax, 2013) to EDTA. Prolonged treatment with calcium EDTA gives rise to depletion of magnesium and trace-metal depletion, the most marked being due to the excretion of zinc. Zinc depletion destroys your cells’ ability to absorb nutrients and leads to diabetes. A 2015 study entitled, Quality of Life Outcomes with a Disodium EDTA Chelation Regimen for Coronary Disease: Results from the TACT Randomized Trial concluded with this statement: “In conclusion, our study shows that in a population of stable, largely asymptomatic coronary artery disease patients with prior myocardial infarction, use of EDTA chelation therapy did not produce a measurable change in health-related quality of life over 2 years of follow-up.” Severe kidney damage from EDTA chelation therapy was reported in a (Nissel 1986) trial. In a very short period of time, EDTA causes kidneys to shut down in complete failure. A study from 2015 suggests EDTA chelation for myocardial infarction with “modest” benefits to cardio health. However, I would suggest that the moderate benefits of this study were due to the high doses of vitamin C administered. A 2017 study on EDTA chelation for atherosclerosis and Miocardial Infraction concluded: “Unsubstantiated claims of chelation therapy as an effective treatment of atherosclerosis should be avoided and patients made aware of the inadequate evidence for efficacy and potential adverse effects, especially the harm that can occur if used as a substitute for proven therapies.” In a 2018 EDTA trial it was concluded: “These results… are not sufficient to support the routine use of chelation therapy for treatment of patients who have had an MI (Miocardial Infraction)”. A study from 2023 entitled, Chelation Therapy Associated with Antioxidant Supplementation Can Decrease Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Multiple Sclerosis: Preliminary Results proved a flop with two participants discontinuing their trial participation. EDTA for lead poisoning DEBUNKED EDTA has also been touted as a treatment for lead poisoning. Because of its adverse effects, calcium EDTA was replaced by DMSA in the treatment of lead poisoning (Aposhian et al., 1995) in 1995. CaEDTA has also been used for the treatment of cases with manganese toxicity, but the result was neurotoxic symptoms resembling PARKINSONISM (Andersen, 1999). A 2004 trial showed that EDTA actually REDISTRIBUTES LEAD TO THE BRAIN after acute or chronic lead exposure (Andersen, 2004). Another trial proved adverse effects in 5 patients receiving EDTA at an outpatient chelation clinic in 2002, and all patients experienced gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal symptoms. Oral exposure to EDTA (2002) had produced adverse reproductive and developmental effects in animals. EDTA did not make it past the animal or human trials, so why are medical doctors using it in humans? A 2002 EDTA trial was performed on humans as a test for “chelation” therapy by a chelation clinic, demonstrating adverse events in 5 out of 5 patients. Additionally, EDTA is a persistent organic pollutant (POP). In that case, each intake would only be partially excreted, while the remaining chemicals build up in the body and produce cell death. And long-term exposure to calcium disodium EDTA creates toxicity and kidney damage. EDTA Snakeoil Salesmen In March 2023, Ana Maria Mihalcea interviewed Dr. Michael Roth who claims that EDTA is a “synthetic amino acid related to vinegar.” Together they make a slew of medical claims that are not scientifically proven, such as that EDTA “detoxifies covid vaccine, heavy metals, graphene oxide, parasites, hydrogels, and nanoparticles”. The only scientific tool Ana Maria uses to back her claims is dark field microscopy. You cannot see nanoparticles with a dark field microscope. It takes a spectroscopy microscope to identify nanoparticles. Her medical claims are simply fabricated and unscientific lies. Ana Maria and Dr. Ross made additional unproven medical statements that “EDTA removes the effects of a heart attack, can bring back the elderly from senility and Alzheimer’s, reduces blood pressure, detoxifies several snake and spider venoms, lowers insulin, smooths skin and wrinkles, ” and a host of other laughable health claims that aren’t backed by anything. Incidentally, Dr. Ross is now dead. “Dr. Roth sadly passed away on March 11/2023” My sources informed me that Dr. Rashid Buttar was using EDTA. Given that he was already severely poisoned as Stew Peter’s reported, using EDTA Acid would have been enough to tip him over the edge and kill him. EDTA is not an approved pharmaceutical drug. It was Covid Emergency approved by the FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), just like the modified RNA (modRNA) Covid-19 vaccine nanotechnology. The National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (.gov) makes it clear that the use of EDTA chelation for heart disease has not been approved by the FDA. Ana Maria has been touting EDTA as an “antioxidant” when it is not. She even published to her Substack that EDTA is an “Antioxidant” when in fact it’s an acid poison and an oxidant. Many people saw it on her Substack before she removed it. I’ve had over a dozen clients come to me extremely sick from EDTA pills and EDTA IV infusion. Some told me they thought it was a natural substance due to Ana Maria’s false advertising and medical malfeasance. A Medical Doctor is licensed to know wether EDTA Acid is an oxidant poison or an antioxidant. Not knowing this and inducing the death of a patient is not an acceptable excuse. Ana Maria is criminally liable. EDTA is an oxidant when used internally. The studies that refer to EDTA as an “antioxidant” are in vitro lab studies, not in vivo (inside the body). EDTA is used to preserve cell specimens for chemistry lab work because it prevents blood coagulation and oxidation of cells in a petri dish where it’s used for diagnostic purposes. This is the kind of “antioxidant” the studies are referring to. But when you infuse EDTA Acid into the human body, it acts as an oxidant poison. EDTA also will not decoagulate the blood in vivo (inside the body). But I can see how people who cannot read peer-reviewed literature could be deceived and manipulated by snake oil salesmen. For example, a study entitled, “Comparative study of the antioxidant capability of EDTA and Irganox”. EDTA is a preservative used in laboratories to preserve cells for scientific lab research. EDTA prevents the oxidation of cells in a petri dish. Oxygen causes cells to deteriorate, but labs need them to last longer for research purposes. When used inside the human body (in vivo), it’s a different story. Then EDTA acts as an oxidant poison, not an antioxidant. So this has a very different meaning. One of the well documented and widely known adverse events from EDTA “chelation” is DEATH, according to Mount Sinai. Other serious side effects that have been reported include low blood sugar, diminished calcium levels, headache, nausea, dangerously low blood pressure, kidney failure, organ damage, irregular heartbeat, seizures, or even death. I have to wonder if Ana Maria Mihalcea is informing her patients that death is a potential adverse event to EDTA chelation? In a March 24, 2024, broadcast that Ana Maria released, at the 53:24 minute mark, she makes a chilling confession: “I already have had… uh… patients die from the shedding” How many of Ana Maria Mihalcea’s patients have been killed by her EDTA infusion protocol? I was horrified when I heard Ana Maria’s confession because I haven’t had any clients die from shedding! I’ve treated many people who were extremely sick from shedding, and I helped them all to detox effectively. Some clients came to me after several hospitalizations from extreme shedding but none of them died in my care! Nobody needs to die from shedding if they use an effective detox protocol. Between 1-2 years, Ana Maria has been claiming that EDTA detoxes graphene, dissolves graphene and chelates heavy metals, but experts such as Dr. Robert Young and Dr. Judy Mikovitz told me this is impossible. Ana Maria has gone so far as to produce a medical study with unscientific claims right in the title, “EDTA Chelation Dissolves the Artificial Intelligence Magnetic Hydrogel Weapon”. The study was also promoted by Health Canada. In her study, Ana Maria claims that EDTA can “detoxify the body even from Graphene”. EDTA is not a detox agent! Again, it’s an oxidant that degrades cells whereas genuine antioxidants repair cells. Ana Maria does in fact know about oxidant poisons. In an interview from December 2022, she referred to graphene as an oxidant. At least she’s correct about something. Saul Green, Ph.D., and Wallace I. Sampson, M.D. wrote in great detail about the Implausibility of EDTA Chelation Therapy, stating: “EDTA chelation effectiveness is implausible; (2) the preponderance of evidence shows ineffectiveness; and (3) EDTA augments oxidative reactions involving iron instead of inhibiting them, resulting in increased likelihood of production of oxygen free radicals rather than neutralization of them, as claimed.” EDTA a precurser to cellular transfection The Rockefeller Institue of Medicine has done clinical research on EDTA. One particular study entitled, Studies of Cell Deformity from 1967, shows that cells will degrade from EDTA exposure, which also induces “deformation” on their surfaces. The trial demonstrated that EDTA stops cellular synthesis of calcium. They learned that calcium is bound to anionic sites at the cell periphery, some of which are located at the cellular electrokinetic surface. Due to Rockefeller’s research, EDTA is now used in electrophoresis which is a laboratory technique used to separate DNA, RNA or protein molecules based on their size and electrical charge. An electric current is used to move the molecules through a gel or other matrix, according to the National Human Genome Research Institute. In agarose gel electrophoresis, EDTA is added for chelating the magnesium ions which are cofactors for DNA nucleases. Hence, activity of DNA nucleases that may be present is inhibited, and “DNA is protected from degrading”. This is why EDTA is an effective transfection agent because it dissolves parts of your DNA, preserving cells for lab research in vitro. Gel electrophoresis using EDTA is routinely used for detection and size analysis of proteins and nucleic acid. DMSO is used with EDTA in this process. This destruction of cells makes transfection (gene editing) of cells easier using CRISPR-Cas9 which splices and dices the genome in vivo, as this study explains entitled, “Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex assembly by anti-CRISPR AcrIIC2”. EDTA was found to be genotoxic in laboratory animals. A study from 1983 demonstrates that EDTA induces gene mutations and chromosomal breakage, meaning that genetic mutations will be passed on your offspring, affecting generations to come, according to this Genetic Toxicology of EDTA study from 1983. Calcium chelate of EDTA (CaEDTA) “chelation” has shown teratogenic effects (Catsch & Harmuth-Hoene, 1976), which are central nervous system depression and peripheral neuropathy. EDTA produced abnormalities in pups of rats removed by cesarian section on day 21 of the study. Increases in several abnormalities (cleft palate, adactyly or syndactyly, abnormal rib or abnormal vertebrae) were observed with increased doses of CaEDTA. EDTA improves transfection of embryonic stem cells lines (hESC) in cells, according to the NIH. According to a peer reviewed paper from the NIH, EDTA is a precursor to cellular transfection. “We found that chemically abrading the differentiated CACO-2 human intestinal epithelial cell layer by a trypsin and EDTA pretreatment (before the use of detergent-like transfection reagents) dramatically improved transfection efficiency in this polar, differentiated model. Although this treatment did improve the transfection efficiency, it also induced leakiness in the epithelial barrier by both opening tight junctional complexes and by creating holes in the cell layer because of low-level cell death and detachment. Thus, this approach to enhance the transfection efficiency of polar, differentiated cells will be useful for assessment of the effect of the transfected/expressed protein on (re)formation of an epithelial barrier..." Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Fetal Bovine Serum for human transfection also uses EDTA. An NIH study entitled, “Kinetic Basis for DNA Target Specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a” reveals that EDTA enables rapid binding to DNA during gene editing (transfection). Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” explains: “CAS12a is an RNA-guided, programmable genome editing enzyme found within bacterial adaptive immune pathways. Unlike CRISPR-Cas9, Cas12a uses only a single catalytic site to both cleave target double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) (cis-activity) and indiscriminately degrade single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) (trans-activity).” According to the study, “A DNA loading buffer of 45% formamide and 15 mM EDTA, with a trace amount of xylene cyanol and bromophenol blue…” is used to transfect the human genome. So, EDTA is a transfection agent used with CRISPR-Cas9 to edit the human genome. Does EDTA actually dissolve graphene, as Ana Maria claims? The answer is NO! EDTA oxidant is used to reduce graphene to Reduced Graphene Oxide (RGO) form. Graphene is reduced by oxidation. Rather than dissolving graphene, EDTA reduces it to Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles otherwise known as Quantum Dots. Graphene oxide is more toxic than graphene, as I documented in my article entitled, “Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide”. I will emphasize again that Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots cannot be seen with a dark field microscope. So Ana Maria’s claims that EDTA is detoxing graphene from the human body is unscientific. EDTA chelation for graphene nanocomposites EDTA chelation is NOT effective in removing metals from the human body. It's actually a different kind of chelation that’s used to create electrochemical sensors (biosensors) when combined with GRAPHENE! EDTA serves as a connecting mediator between NiHCF (Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles and Nickle) and graphene nanosheets. EDTA is used with metal nanoparticles, metal oxides, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and quantum dots to stabilize the technology for a more uniform distribution throughout the body. A Science Direct paper entitled, “Highly sensitive ascorbid acid sensors from EDTA chelation derived nickel hexacyanoferrate/graphene nanocomposites” reveals that EDTA is used to create Graphene/Nickel, AA sensor nanocomposites. “EDTA chelation stragey” is used for the “homogeneously distrubuted" NiHCF” (Nickel hexacyanoferrate composite) on graphene sheets. EDTA residue-supported pyramidal and spherical nanoparticles of NiHCF deposited on graphene sheets is used to create biosensors for the formation of Graphene/Nickel hydrogels. The graphene hydrogel nanocomposite sensors (Gr/NiHCF) are used as externally controlled biosensing tools. They tell us it’s used to test for ascorbic acid, but the application of this technology is for “human life” as well as for industrial use. See link here. Graphene oxide/Lauric acid nanoparticles are modified using EDTA. Lauric acid nanoparticles is suggested as a “prospective drug carrier” for oral nanoparticle-mediated sustained drug delivery (timed release technology) used for the removal of Pb(II) ions (lead). However, studies show there are cytotoxic results. Another study entitled, “Improved genome editing by an engineered CRISPR-Cas12a” demonstrates how EDTA improves transfection and modification of the human genome. Once Graphene is reduced to Graphene Oxide, due to its small particulate size, you can no longer identify it using a Dark Field Microscope. Ana Maria is using a dark field scope, not a spectroscopy microscope, which is the only instrument that can measure GON and Quantum Dots. So what is Ana Maria doing with EDTA infusions? She’s creating a metal-EDTA complex that stabilizes and strengthens the graphene-based nanotech weapon system and enables it to spread more readily throughout the body, for human transfection. She uses “light and sound healing techniques” to activate the delayed release technology before administering EDTA infusion, as she reveals in an interview here. EDTA is a poison acid that dissolves DNA. It's used to prime the cells’ DNA for transfection. EDTA disrupts the surface of skin cells so that other chemicals can penetrate more easily and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology can work more efficiently. The NIH describes EDTA’s enhanced cellular transfection: “Flow cytometric analysis using an enhanced green fluorescent protein vector showed a significantly increased transfection efficiency of EDTA method compared to standard enzyme method. In addition, the EDTA approach maintained stable cell viability and recovery rate of hESCs after transfection.” Another study published in Research Gate, confirms that EDTA increases cellular transfection, along with using chloroquine. Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots (GOQD-HA) nanocomposite use EDTA for tissue-specific delivery of Metformin, an anti-diabetic drug otherwise known as insulin. Conclusion Beware of snakeoil salesmen! Never trust pharmaceuticals! Superior heavy metal chelation supplements exist such as ASEA redox molecules and Master Peace, sign up and order here. Medicines made from nature are always superior to pharmaceutical drugs. Finally, be sure your Naturopathic Doctor is competent! Schedule a health consultation with me for a customized detox protocol and complete cellular health restoration. https://substack.com/home/post/p-144979143
    SUBSTACK.COM
    EDTA Snakeoil! Ana Maria Mihalcea's Medical Malfeasance Exposed
    “I already have had.. uh.. patients die from shedding” - Ana Maria Mihalcea, M.D.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 32K Views 0 Reviews
More Results