• Non-Lethal Weapons Now Used as a Label for Self-Defense: Closer Review and Public Discussion Needed in This Age of Promoted Social Harassment
    Don't Forget Unlicensed Radio Devices: Why on earth are they allowed on planes?

    Ramola D
    Recent finds on a search for non lethal weapons on light planes in conjunction with the FCC approval of intentional radiators and unlicensed radio devices on manned and unmanned aircraft, discussed recently here—https://everydayconcerned.net/2024/07/14/treasonous-sorties-fcc-approval-of-high-frequency-short-range-radars-spotlights-the-targeted-assault-millions-report-intentional-radiators-unlicensed-radio-devices-low-flying-aircraft/—reveal that “self defense” has now become a category in which such weaponry, unlawfully being used on people worldwide today, is being surfaced.

    Is this how these tech-transferred military weapons are now being silently slipped into social awareness and use, without public disclosure at time of development and “testing” on people, without public discourse and debate, and without public approval?

    But what exactly are the weapons being surfaced here—are they the electromagnetic weapons and acoustic weapons developed by the Joint Steering Program Group involving both DARPA and DOJ, or by the DOD and its contractors? A look at these articles suggests some of them are:

    https://shadowfoxhq.com/non-lethal-weapons-plane/


    https://athlonoutdoors.com/article/non-lethal-self-defense-options/


    https://www.stunster.com/blog/tsa-guidelines-for-non-lethal-self-defense-devices-on-planes/


    Non-Lethal Self-Defense or Deadly Inhumane?

    The “Best Non Lethal Self Defense Weapons-2023” article lists various scary looking guns and stun guns and electrical assault weapons like the Taser, known to be outright inhumane—is it possible such horrific electrical weapons could now be being sold to people as “non lethal self-defense”? These look like Conducted Electrical Weapons self-permitted to the police by the police; can anyone and everyone now step out and buy a few, to whack people with? How did this happen?


    TSA Guidelines for Non Lethal Self Defense Devices

    Perusing the TSA article it sounds like knives and “kubotans” —rods to knock people out with—are ok to carry in cabins on planes. But how on earth did this happen? Has the TSA changed so much? The article is dated March 2024. A brief look at the TSA website shows they don’t permit knives in carry-ons, nor “kirpans”—no mention of “kubotans.” Cattle prods and ice picks are ok to carry in checked luggage though, apparently. And crochet hooks and knitting needles are ok in carry-ons. [I’m not sure if we’re reading satire here.]

    The TSA page is organized by category so perhaps closer review and writing to the TSA is in order here.


    https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/sharp-objects

    As aware, educated, civic-minded Americans, this becomes one more task for all of us to stay focused on.

    How Comfortable Would You Be Knowing Your Plane Mates, All Sudden Targeters and Socially Harassive Now, are Carrying Pulse Radar Devices in their Cell Phones & iPads?

    According to the FCC, as covered here this week, pulse radar devices in the range 59.3 to 71.0 Ghz can be “installed in passengers’ personal portable equipment” for operations on-board aircraft.


    Passengers pointing pulse radar devices at each other—how sane is that? But this is exactly what is happening today, what this writer has certainly witnessed and experienced herself, as directed at her.

    Now how on earth is the TSA permitting this crazed behavior? Perhaps the TSA and FCC need to talk? And are people really letting the FBI, CIA, and DHS—who permit and set up these Pulsed-Radar-Pointing moments to sicken, debilitate, disable people on airplanes—get away with such crime? For how is this not crime?

    As this writer has further experienced and is perfectly aware of, the TSA in fact lets on board many many more weapons of sickening and inhumanity than mere cell phones and iPads with pulse-radar devices installed, weapons often carried in seeming laptop cases or violin cases or long tubes and able to send ELFs into seats, vibrations and pulsations into bodies, and pulse microwave onto people’s backs and heads and hearts. [Necessitating shielding and vigilance on planes.]

    “Community-Based Research,” “Community Policing,” “Community Monitoring” Which Has Bred Hatred, Racism, Discrimination, Rage, Anger, Misery, Despair Against and Between and Among People of All the Different Ethnicities Which Make Up America

    People today in the USA—and probably the whole world—have learned to hate each other pretty well now, based on skin-color and hair-color and size and shape, as directed by the sad “security” and “police” and “intelligence” city bosses with lies in hand as in FBI-folders of lies, False-Claim-NSLs, long unfolding programs of nonstop false-allegation, attempted entrapping, attempted manufacture of crime and nonstop Psy Ops, Phoenix ops of street theatre, directed conversations and actions and moments, and studied, set-up harassment and targeting of select people in every neighborhood.

    This is an atmosphere of social harassment and driven hate which defies American history and striving through colonialism, slavery, waves of immigration, and the striving for independence and expression of basic human and civil rights. We live in a world now where people distrust each other, are taught to hate and act against each other, and in fact enact crimes of racism and selective discrimination, crime, and harassment against each other.

    In such an atmosphere, do any of us want to board planes where the TSA kindly lets people carry pocket knives and crochet hooks? Or Pulse Radar devices in smart phones and iPads? (A subject to be covered more extensively shortly.)

    There is much here to get us all thinking and moving today, and much for each of us to do.

    This writer advises that everyone, literally everyone, get up to speed on these subjects and contact the TSA and request that no-one, absolutely no-one is let on planes carrying augmented cell phones and iPads and other electronics permitting pulse wave microwave assault—hidden as “monitoring” “health monitoring” “Public Safety Monitoring” and other such—on other passengers.

    Looking into this further online, “health monitoring” may be the way such things get authorized for use on planes, so perhaps that is the first subject to address. This article from Verizon shows that different kinds of monitors can be installed on smart phones, such as an “integrated heart monitor”:


    https://www.verizon.com/articles/what-can-a-smartphone-do/

    The question of whether those engaging in such paid, mercenary “monitoring” assault on others will communicate the fact of their phones being augmented also rises. Perhaps all these are covert operations—in which case, how can the TSA address this best? Does the TSA really “care” about us?

    This is obviously a huge subject which needs public discussion, but the information from the FCC establishes for us this is actually happening and being permitted by the TSA, by airlines, by the FAA, and by airport security—and shouldn’t be.

    Please visit the TSA website and find someone to speak to or write to at the Contact Center: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/tsa-cares.

    As passengers, we should All be able to fly—and visit airports—safe and free from pulsed radar and vibrations, gruesome headaches, sudden respiratory trouble, projectile vomiting and manufactured heart attacks, not to mention the threat of pocket knives from crazed graduate students in “Neuropsychiatry” aiming for Psych Terror, not just some of us.

    https://ramolad.substack.com/p/non-lethal-weapons-now-used-as-a?utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
    Non-Lethal Weapons Now Used as a Label for Self-Defense: Closer Review and Public Discussion Needed in This Age of Promoted Social Harassment Don't Forget Unlicensed Radio Devices: Why on earth are they allowed on planes? Ramola D Recent finds on a search for non lethal weapons on light planes in conjunction with the FCC approval of intentional radiators and unlicensed radio devices on manned and unmanned aircraft, discussed recently here—https://everydayconcerned.net/2024/07/14/treasonous-sorties-fcc-approval-of-high-frequency-short-range-radars-spotlights-the-targeted-assault-millions-report-intentional-radiators-unlicensed-radio-devices-low-flying-aircraft/—reveal that “self defense” has now become a category in which such weaponry, unlawfully being used on people worldwide today, is being surfaced. Is this how these tech-transferred military weapons are now being silently slipped into social awareness and use, without public disclosure at time of development and “testing” on people, without public discourse and debate, and without public approval? But what exactly are the weapons being surfaced here—are they the electromagnetic weapons and acoustic weapons developed by the Joint Steering Program Group involving both DARPA and DOJ, or by the DOD and its contractors? A look at these articles suggests some of them are: https://shadowfoxhq.com/non-lethal-weapons-plane/ https://athlonoutdoors.com/article/non-lethal-self-defense-options/ https://www.stunster.com/blog/tsa-guidelines-for-non-lethal-self-defense-devices-on-planes/ Non-Lethal Self-Defense or Deadly Inhumane? The “Best Non Lethal Self Defense Weapons-2023” article lists various scary looking guns and stun guns and electrical assault weapons like the Taser, known to be outright inhumane—is it possible such horrific electrical weapons could now be being sold to people as “non lethal self-defense”? These look like Conducted Electrical Weapons self-permitted to the police by the police; can anyone and everyone now step out and buy a few, to whack people with? How did this happen? TSA Guidelines for Non Lethal Self Defense Devices Perusing the TSA article it sounds like knives and “kubotans” —rods to knock people out with—are ok to carry in cabins on planes. But how on earth did this happen? Has the TSA changed so much? The article is dated March 2024. A brief look at the TSA website shows they don’t permit knives in carry-ons, nor “kirpans”—no mention of “kubotans.” Cattle prods and ice picks are ok to carry in checked luggage though, apparently. And crochet hooks and knitting needles are ok in carry-ons. [I’m not sure if we’re reading satire here.] The TSA page is organized by category so perhaps closer review and writing to the TSA is in order here. https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-screening/whatcanibring/sharp-objects As aware, educated, civic-minded Americans, this becomes one more task for all of us to stay focused on. How Comfortable Would You Be Knowing Your Plane Mates, All Sudden Targeters and Socially Harassive Now, are Carrying Pulse Radar Devices in their Cell Phones & iPads? According to the FCC, as covered here this week, pulse radar devices in the range 59.3 to 71.0 Ghz can be “installed in passengers’ personal portable equipment” for operations on-board aircraft. Passengers pointing pulse radar devices at each other—how sane is that? But this is exactly what is happening today, what this writer has certainly witnessed and experienced herself, as directed at her. Now how on earth is the TSA permitting this crazed behavior? Perhaps the TSA and FCC need to talk? And are people really letting the FBI, CIA, and DHS—who permit and set up these Pulsed-Radar-Pointing moments to sicken, debilitate, disable people on airplanes—get away with such crime? For how is this not crime? As this writer has further experienced and is perfectly aware of, the TSA in fact lets on board many many more weapons of sickening and inhumanity than mere cell phones and iPads with pulse-radar devices installed, weapons often carried in seeming laptop cases or violin cases or long tubes and able to send ELFs into seats, vibrations and pulsations into bodies, and pulse microwave onto people’s backs and heads and hearts. [Necessitating shielding and vigilance on planes.] “Community-Based Research,” “Community Policing,” “Community Monitoring” Which Has Bred Hatred, Racism, Discrimination, Rage, Anger, Misery, Despair Against and Between and Among People of All the Different Ethnicities Which Make Up America People today in the USA—and probably the whole world—have learned to hate each other pretty well now, based on skin-color and hair-color and size and shape, as directed by the sad “security” and “police” and “intelligence” city bosses with lies in hand as in FBI-folders of lies, False-Claim-NSLs, long unfolding programs of nonstop false-allegation, attempted entrapping, attempted manufacture of crime and nonstop Psy Ops, Phoenix ops of street theatre, directed conversations and actions and moments, and studied, set-up harassment and targeting of select people in every neighborhood. This is an atmosphere of social harassment and driven hate which defies American history and striving through colonialism, slavery, waves of immigration, and the striving for independence and expression of basic human and civil rights. We live in a world now where people distrust each other, are taught to hate and act against each other, and in fact enact crimes of racism and selective discrimination, crime, and harassment against each other. In such an atmosphere, do any of us want to board planes where the TSA kindly lets people carry pocket knives and crochet hooks? Or Pulse Radar devices in smart phones and iPads? (A subject to be covered more extensively shortly.) There is much here to get us all thinking and moving today, and much for each of us to do. This writer advises that everyone, literally everyone, get up to speed on these subjects and contact the TSA and request that no-one, absolutely no-one is let on planes carrying augmented cell phones and iPads and other electronics permitting pulse wave microwave assault—hidden as “monitoring” “health monitoring” “Public Safety Monitoring” and other such—on other passengers. Looking into this further online, “health monitoring” may be the way such things get authorized for use on planes, so perhaps that is the first subject to address. This article from Verizon shows that different kinds of monitors can be installed on smart phones, such as an “integrated heart monitor”: https://www.verizon.com/articles/what-can-a-smartphone-do/ The question of whether those engaging in such paid, mercenary “monitoring” assault on others will communicate the fact of their phones being augmented also rises. Perhaps all these are covert operations—in which case, how can the TSA address this best? Does the TSA really “care” about us? This is obviously a huge subject which needs public discussion, but the information from the FCC establishes for us this is actually happening and being permitted by the TSA, by airlines, by the FAA, and by airport security—and shouldn’t be. Please visit the TSA website and find someone to speak to or write to at the Contact Center: https://www.tsa.gov/travel/tsa-cares. As passengers, we should All be able to fly—and visit airports—safe and free from pulsed radar and vibrations, gruesome headaches, sudden respiratory trouble, projectile vomiting and manufactured heart attacks, not to mention the threat of pocket knives from crazed graduate students in “Neuropsychiatry” aiming for Psych Terror, not just some of us. https://ramolad.substack.com/p/non-lethal-weapons-now-used-as-a?utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
    0 Comments 0 Shares 375 Views
  • Master Market Moves with AltSignals!
    When the market is consolidating and you just can't sit on your hands, we have a tip for you!
    Join our AltSignals for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together!
    Use CLUSTER and AltScalpPRO, our fancy tools that are absolutely FREE for AltAlgo Lifetime VIPs, and go scalping those spicy meme coins!
    Join us: https://bit.ly/MarketAnalysisASI
    Remember, when the market is snoozing, we're making profits!
    Join us for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together!
    Master Market Moves with AltSignals! When the market is consolidating and you just can't sit on your hands, we have a tip for you! 🚀 Join our AltSignals for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together! 🌄 Use CLUSTER and AltScalpPRO, our fancy tools that are absolutely FREE for AltAlgo Lifetime VIPs, and go scalping those spicy meme coins! 🌶️ Join us: https://bit.ly/MarketAnalysisASI Remember, when the market is snoozing, we're making profits! 💰 Join us for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together! 🌟
    BIT.LY
    AltSignals - #1 Best Crypto Signals
    Join AltSignals VIP - The Best Telegram Crypto Signals. Daily Trading Signals for Binance Futures, Spot & Forex since 2017. Over 50K Members!
    0 Comments 0 Shares 97 Views
  • Master Market Moves with AltSignals!
    When the market is consolidating and you just can't sit on your hands, we have a tip for you!
    Join our AltSignals for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together!
    Use CLUSTER and AltScalpPRO, our fancy tools that are absolutely FREE for AltAlgo Lifetime VIPs, and go scalping those spicy meme coins!
    Join us: https://bit.ly/MarketAnalysisASI
    Remember, when the market is snoozing, we're making profits!
    Join us for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together!
    Master Market Moves with AltSignals! When the market is consolidating and you just can't sit on your hands, we have a tip for you! 🚀 Join our AltSignals for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together! 🌄 Use CLUSTER and AltScalpPRO, our fancy tools that are absolutely FREE for AltAlgo Lifetime VIPs, and go scalping those spicy meme coins! 🌶️ Join us: https://bit.ly/MarketAnalysisASI Remember, when the market is snoozing, we're making profits! 💰 Join us for the ride and let's conquer the market peaks and valleys together! 🌟
    BIT.LY
    AltSignals - #1 Best Crypto Signals
    Join AltSignals VIP - The Best Telegram Crypto Signals. Daily Trading Signals for Binance Futures, Spot & Forex since 2017. Over 50K Members!
    0 Comments 0 Shares 122 Views
  • Mandating COVID shots ‘one of the greatest mistakes,’ former CDC chief says

    Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated.
    (Article by John-Michael Dumais repulished from ChildrensHealthDefense.org)

    Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research.

    The late admission of vaccine injuries underscores the failure of public health agencies and the medical establishment to provide informed consent to the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide.

    “It’s important that he is telling the truth now,” vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D., told The Defender. “Adverse events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.”

    Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He declared biosecurity “our nation’s greatest national security threat,” calling for a halt to gain-of-function research pending further debate.

    The hearing, which featured contentious exchanges between senators and witnesses, also touched on controversial topics such as the COVID-19 origins lab-leak theory and allegations that health agencies suppressed data.

    mRNA vax ‘should have been open to personal choice’

    During the hearing Redfield, who oversaw the CDC during the crucial early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, elaborated on his recent statements about mRNA vaccine safety.

    “I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines,” Redfield said. “They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice.”

    Redfield went further, admitting that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong pro-inflammatory response.”

    He noted that in his own medical practice, he doesn’t administer mRNA vaccines, preferring “killed protein vaccines” instead.

    Redfield’s statements stand in stark contrast to the CDC’s official stance during his tenure, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccine uptake as safe and effective.

    Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed Redfield on the issue, highlighting concerning data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Johnson presented figures showing over 37,000 deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccination, with 24% occurring within two days of injection.

    Redfield acknowledged there was “not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines.” He criticized attempts to “underreport any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated.”


    ‘FDA should release all of the safety data’

    Redfield’s criticism of data withholding extended beyond vaccine side effects. He expressed disappointment in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) handling of vaccine safety information.

    “The FDA should release all of the safety data they have,” Redfield said. “I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination.”

    Johnson echoed these concerns, revealing his frustration with the lack of follow-through by health agencies and the committee itself.

    “I’m not getting cooperation out of the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigation to issue subpoenas to get this,” Johnson said, referring to unreleased data and documents.

    The senator displayed a chart comparing adverse event reports for various drugs, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, to those for COVID-19 vaccines. The stark contrast in reported deaths from these therapeutics — with COVID-19 vaccines showing significantly higher numbers — fueled Johnson’s demand for more transparency.

    “As important as the cover-up of the origin story is, there’s a lot more that’s being covered up,” Johnson asserted. “The public has a right to know. We pay for these agencies. We pay their salaries. We fund these studies.”

    Redfield agreed with Johnson’s assessment, stating that withholding the information is “counterproductive.”

    Redfield doubtful of ‘any benefit from [gain-of-function] research’

    Redfield’s testimony took another controversial turn when he called for a pause on gain-of-function research, experiments that involve making pathogens more infectious or deadly.

    “I’m not aware of any advanced therapeutic or vaccine that has come to pass because of gain-of-function research,” Redfield said. “I do think there has to be a very aggressive debate of whether there’s any benefit from that research.”

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) seized on this point, introducing his Risky Research Review Act. The bill aims to establish an independent board within the executive branch to oversee federal funding for high-risk life sciences research.

    “If the Risky Research Review Act had been in place, it might have prevented the COVID-19 pandemic,” Paul said, citing Redfield’s endorsement.

    MIT’s Kevin Esvelt, Ph.D., inventor of a technique for rapidly evolving proteins and other biomolecules who was also instrumental in developing CRISPR gene-editing technology, reinforced these concerns.

    Highlighting gaps in current oversight, he described an experiment where his team — with FBI approval — successfully ordered DNA fragments of the 1918 influenza virus from 36 of 38 providers.

    “Everything that we did and the companies did was entirely legal,” Esvelt said, underscoring the potential for misuse. “There are no laws regulating DNA synthesis, even though the industry group, the International Gene Synthesis Consortium, has requested congressional regulation.”

    The hearing revealed a growing consensus among witnesses for stricter oversight of potentially dangerous research, with Redfield suggesting such studies should be “highly regulated” to protect national security.

    Redfield reaffirms COVID lab-leak theory

    The hearing reignited debate over the origins of COVID-19, with Redfield reaffirming his belief in the lab-leak theory.

    “Based on my initial analysis, I believe then, and I still believe today, that the COVID infections were the direct result of a biomedical research experiment and subsequent lab leak,” Redfield stated.

    This assertion led to a heated exchange between Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Carrie Wolinetz, Ph.D., former chief of staff to then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins. Hawley accused NIH officials of deliberately suppressing the lab-leak theory.

    “Your office, Dr. [Anthony] Fauci and others tried to actively censor them,” Hawley said. “There was a propaganda effort that this paper was the center of, and now everybody says, ‘Oh, well, we just weren’t sure at the time.’”

    Hawley referred to the 2020 “Proximal Origin” paper that argued against the lab-leak hypothesis.

    Wolinetz defended the NIH’s actions. “I do not believe censorship took place, sir.” She maintained that discussions about the virus’s origins were part of normal scientific discourse.

    Redfield, however, criticized the lack of thorough investigation into both natural origin and lab-leak hypotheses. “Unfortunately, this didn’t happen,” he said, adding that four years later, he believes there’s no meaningful evidence supporting a natural origin.

    The former CDC director also revealed that he did not learn about concerning biodistribution studies of the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles until as late as the summer of 2021, suggesting a delay in critical information reaching top health officials.

    ‘Biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat’

    Redfield emphasized the critical importance of biosecurity in national defense.

    “In 2024, 2025, biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat,” Redfield stated. “You need to think of it the same way we thought about the verge of nuclear atomic [sic] in the late 40s, 50s, and 60s.”

    He called for a proportional response to the threat, suggesting the creation of a dedicated agency within the U.S. Department of Energy to address biosecurity concerns.

    “We have a $900 billion Defense Department for the threat of China, North Korea and Russia,” Redfield noted. “We don’t have really any systematic agency or network of private sector contractors to help us with the biosecurity threat.”

    Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) echoed this sentiment. “In my humble mind, a viral biosecurity issue is a bigger issue than China’s military threat to us.”

    Gerald Parker, DVM, Ph.D., associate dean for Global One Health at Texas A&M University, supported the call for enhanced oversight, recommending “an independent authority to consolidate secure functions in a single entity with a dedicated mission.”

    The hearing also touched on the potential for future pandemics, with Redfield repeating his warnings about the potential spread of H5N1 bird flu.

    As the hearing concluded, senators from both parties expressed concern over the lack of transparency and oversight in high-risk research.

    Paul summarized the sentiment: “We cannot stand idly by. We must demand accountability, strive for transparency and ensure the safety of our citizens is never again compromised by negligence or deceit.”

    Watch the July 11 hearing: ‘Risky Research’:

    Read more at: ChildrensHealthDefense.org

    http://www.naturalnews.com/2024-07-17-mandating-covid-shots-one-of-greatest-mistakes.html
    Mandating COVID shots ‘one of the greatest mistakes,’ former CDC chief says Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated. (Article by John-Michael Dumais repulished from ChildrensHealthDefense.org) Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on government oversight of taxpayer-funded high-risk virus research. The late admission of vaccine injuries underscores the failure of public health agencies and the medical establishment to provide informed consent to the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide. “It’s important that he is telling the truth now,” vaccine researcher Jessica Rose, Ph.D., told The Defender. “Adverse events were hidden and still are being hidden to prevent injection hesitancy.” Redfield, who led the CDC from 2018 to 2021, didn’t stop there. He declared biosecurity “our nation’s greatest national security threat,” calling for a halt to gain-of-function research pending further debate. The hearing, which featured contentious exchanges between senators and witnesses, also touched on controversial topics such as the COVID-19 origins lab-leak theory and allegations that health agencies suppressed data. mRNA vax ‘should have been open to personal choice’ During the hearing Redfield, who oversaw the CDC during the crucial early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, elaborated on his recent statements about mRNA vaccine safety. “I do think one of the greatest mistakes that was made, of course, was mandating these vaccines,” Redfield said. “They should have never been mandated. It should have been open to personal choice.” Redfield went further, admitting that the spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines is “toxic to the body” and triggers “a very strong pro-inflammatory response.” He noted that in his own medical practice, he doesn’t administer mRNA vaccines, preferring “killed protein vaccines” instead. Redfield’s statements stand in stark contrast to the CDC’s official stance during his tenure, which strongly promoted mRNA vaccine uptake as safe and effective. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pressed Redfield on the issue, highlighting concerning data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Johnson presented figures showing over 37,000 deaths reported following COVID-19 vaccination, with 24% occurring within two days of injection. Redfield acknowledged there was “not appropriate transparency from the beginning about the potential side effects of these vaccines.” He criticized attempts to “underreport any side effects because they argued that would make the public less likely to get vaccinated.” ‘FDA should release all of the safety data’ Redfield’s criticism of data withholding extended beyond vaccine side effects. He expressed disappointment in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration‘s (FDA) handling of vaccine safety information. “The FDA should release all of the safety data they have,” Redfield said. “I was very disappointed to hear that they were planning to hold on to that until 2026. That really creates a sense of total lack of trust in our public health agencies towards vaccination.” Johnson echoed these concerns, revealing his frustration with the lack of follow-through by health agencies and the committee itself. “I’m not getting cooperation out of the chairman of the permanent subcommittee investigation to issue subpoenas to get this,” Johnson said, referring to unreleased data and documents. The senator displayed a chart comparing adverse event reports for various drugs, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, to those for COVID-19 vaccines. The stark contrast in reported deaths from these therapeutics — with COVID-19 vaccines showing significantly higher numbers — fueled Johnson’s demand for more transparency. “As important as the cover-up of the origin story is, there’s a lot more that’s being covered up,” Johnson asserted. “The public has a right to know. We pay for these agencies. We pay their salaries. We fund these studies.” Redfield agreed with Johnson’s assessment, stating that withholding the information is “counterproductive.” Redfield doubtful of ‘any benefit from [gain-of-function] research’ Redfield’s testimony took another controversial turn when he called for a pause on gain-of-function research, experiments that involve making pathogens more infectious or deadly. “I’m not aware of any advanced therapeutic or vaccine that has come to pass because of gain-of-function research,” Redfield said. “I do think there has to be a very aggressive debate of whether there’s any benefit from that research.” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) seized on this point, introducing his Risky Research Review Act. The bill aims to establish an independent board within the executive branch to oversee federal funding for high-risk life sciences research. “If the Risky Research Review Act had been in place, it might have prevented the COVID-19 pandemic,” Paul said, citing Redfield’s endorsement. MIT’s Kevin Esvelt, Ph.D., inventor of a technique for rapidly evolving proteins and other biomolecules who was also instrumental in developing CRISPR gene-editing technology, reinforced these concerns. Highlighting gaps in current oversight, he described an experiment where his team — with FBI approval — successfully ordered DNA fragments of the 1918 influenza virus from 36 of 38 providers. “Everything that we did and the companies did was entirely legal,” Esvelt said, underscoring the potential for misuse. “There are no laws regulating DNA synthesis, even though the industry group, the International Gene Synthesis Consortium, has requested congressional regulation.” The hearing revealed a growing consensus among witnesses for stricter oversight of potentially dangerous research, with Redfield suggesting such studies should be “highly regulated” to protect national security. Redfield reaffirms COVID lab-leak theory The hearing reignited debate over the origins of COVID-19, with Redfield reaffirming his belief in the lab-leak theory. “Based on my initial analysis, I believe then, and I still believe today, that the COVID infections were the direct result of a biomedical research experiment and subsequent lab leak,” Redfield stated. This assertion led to a heated exchange between Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Carrie Wolinetz, Ph.D., former chief of staff to then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Francis Collins. Hawley accused NIH officials of deliberately suppressing the lab-leak theory. “Your office, Dr. [Anthony] Fauci and others tried to actively censor them,” Hawley said. “There was a propaganda effort that this paper was the center of, and now everybody says, ‘Oh, well, we just weren’t sure at the time.’” Hawley referred to the 2020 “Proximal Origin” paper that argued against the lab-leak hypothesis. Wolinetz defended the NIH’s actions. “I do not believe censorship took place, sir.” She maintained that discussions about the virus’s origins were part of normal scientific discourse. Redfield, however, criticized the lack of thorough investigation into both natural origin and lab-leak hypotheses. “Unfortunately, this didn’t happen,” he said, adding that four years later, he believes there’s no meaningful evidence supporting a natural origin. The former CDC director also revealed that he did not learn about concerning biodistribution studies of the vaccine’s lipid nanoparticles until as late as the summer of 2021, suggesting a delay in critical information reaching top health officials. ‘Biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat’ Redfield emphasized the critical importance of biosecurity in national defense. “In 2024, 2025, biosecurity is our nation’s greatest national security threat,” Redfield stated. “You need to think of it the same way we thought about the verge of nuclear atomic [sic] in the late 40s, 50s, and 60s.” He called for a proportional response to the threat, suggesting the creation of a dedicated agency within the U.S. Department of Energy to address biosecurity concerns. “We have a $900 billion Defense Department for the threat of China, North Korea and Russia,” Redfield noted. “We don’t have really any systematic agency or network of private sector contractors to help us with the biosecurity threat.” Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) echoed this sentiment. “In my humble mind, a viral biosecurity issue is a bigger issue than China’s military threat to us.” Gerald Parker, DVM, Ph.D., associate dean for Global One Health at Texas A&M University, supported the call for enhanced oversight, recommending “an independent authority to consolidate secure functions in a single entity with a dedicated mission.” The hearing also touched on the potential for future pandemics, with Redfield repeating his warnings about the potential spread of H5N1 bird flu. As the hearing concluded, senators from both parties expressed concern over the lack of transparency and oversight in high-risk research. Paul summarized the sentiment: “We cannot stand idly by. We must demand accountability, strive for transparency and ensure the safety of our citizens is never again compromised by negligence or deceit.” Watch the July 11 hearing: ‘Risky Research’: Read more at: ChildrensHealthDefense.org http://www.naturalnews.com/2024-07-17-mandating-covid-shots-one-of-greatest-mistakes.html
    WWW.NATURALNEWS.COM
    Mandating COVID shots ‘one of the greatest mistakes,’ former CDC chief says – NaturalNews.com
    Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Robert Redfield confirmed the dangers of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday, calling them “toxic” and saying they should never have been mandated. (Article by John-Michael Dumais repulished from ChildrensHealthDefense.org) Redfield’s admissions came during a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on […]
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 828 Views
  • Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows
    Frank BergmanJuly 16, 2024 - 12:23 pm

    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer’s equivalent offering.

    According to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna’s shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer’s.

    VAERS is a database that accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination.

    Reports are submitted to VAERS by doctors, healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and other medical professionals.

    A study using data from VAERS was conducted by MIT computer scientist the inventor of the optical computer mouse Steve Kirsch.

    Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), asserts that he is now able to “prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots.”

    According to Kirsch, his study found that “the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer.”

    However, he notes that this was always known “but the medical community chose to ignore it.”

    Explaining his findings in a Substack post, Kirsch notes that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna.

    However, the Pfizer injections only caused 21% more deaths than Moderna.

    “The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer,” Kirsch notes.

    “Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster.”

    “The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE.”

    Kirsch said he wants to provide the computer source code he created for his calculations so that it can be used by other countries to calculate their own deaths per vaccine manufacturer.

    The math code provided by Kirsch is:

    Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information.

    >>> mod_deaths=3714

    >>> pfizer_death=4507

    >>> pfizer_doses=366

    >>> mod_doses=232

    >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses 1.5775862068965518

    >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths 1.2135164243403338

    >>> 1.57/1.21 1.297520661157025

    Kirsch concludes that the mass vaccination campaign has been a “trainwreck.”

    “The end is near,” he warns.

    This news comes as excess deaths continue to soar around the world in the wake of the Covid vaccine rollout.

    As Slay News previously reported, government officials in the Philippines are raising the alarm after the nation has now recorded a staggering 290,000 deaths linked to Covid mRNA shots.

    Unlike other countries around the world, Filipino lawmakers are now sounding the alarm about the crisis and the government has launched a full investigation into the deaths.

    Notably, lawmakers have become alarmed that excess deaths surged among the public after they received Covid mRNA injections.

    Noteworthy hearings have been taking place in the Philippines’ House of Representatives.

    The hearings established that the deaths were not related to COVID-19 and that the spike only emerged after the “vaccines” that were meant to tackle the virus were rolled out for public use.

    During the hearing, lawmakers sought to identify the cause of more than 290,000 excess deaths among the nation’s Covid-vaccinated population.

    Congressman Dan S. Fernandez noted that when the nations began injecting members of the public with mRNA shots in early 2021, the Philippines suffered a 43% spike in its mortality rate.

    “It stands to reason that this very substantial increase in the number of deaths in 2021 could be attributed mainly to either two factors – to COVID-19 infection or to the vaccines themselves,” Fernandez asserted.

    However, during the hearings, lawmakers heard evidence proving that the deaths were not attributed to the virus, meaning they were caused by the injections.

    Strikingly, Fernandez admitted in remarks cited by Aussie 17:

    “We’ve been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandates the pharmaceutical to be responsible.

    “And now we learn from that mistake.”

    READ MORE – Rancher Blows Whistle: Food Supply Spiked with mRNA Vaccines


    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering. According to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna's shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer's.

    https://slaynews.com/news/moderna-covid-shots-more-deaths-pfizer-cdc-data/
    Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows Frank BergmanJuly 16, 2024 - 12:23 pm Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer’s equivalent offering. According to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna’s shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer’s. VAERS is a database that accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Reports are submitted to VAERS by doctors, healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and other medical professionals. A study using data from VAERS was conducted by MIT computer scientist the inventor of the optical computer mouse Steve Kirsch. Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), asserts that he is now able to “prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots.” According to Kirsch, his study found that “the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer.” However, he notes that this was always known “but the medical community chose to ignore it.” Explaining his findings in a Substack post, Kirsch notes that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna. However, the Pfizer injections only caused 21% more deaths than Moderna. “The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer,” Kirsch notes. “Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster.” “The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE.” Kirsch said he wants to provide the computer source code he created for his calculations so that it can be used by other countries to calculate their own deaths per vaccine manufacturer. The math code provided by Kirsch is: Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information. >>> mod_deaths=3714 >>> pfizer_death=4507 >>> pfizer_doses=366 >>> mod_doses=232 >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses 1.5775862068965518 >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths 1.2135164243403338 >>> 1.57/1.21 1.297520661157025 Kirsch concludes that the mass vaccination campaign has been a “trainwreck.” “The end is near,” he warns. This news comes as excess deaths continue to soar around the world in the wake of the Covid vaccine rollout. As Slay News previously reported, government officials in the Philippines are raising the alarm after the nation has now recorded a staggering 290,000 deaths linked to Covid mRNA shots. Unlike other countries around the world, Filipino lawmakers are now sounding the alarm about the crisis and the government has launched a full investigation into the deaths. Notably, lawmakers have become alarmed that excess deaths surged among the public after they received Covid mRNA injections. Noteworthy hearings have been taking place in the Philippines’ House of Representatives. The hearings established that the deaths were not related to COVID-19 and that the spike only emerged after the “vaccines” that were meant to tackle the virus were rolled out for public use. During the hearing, lawmakers sought to identify the cause of more than 290,000 excess deaths among the nation’s Covid-vaccinated population. Congressman Dan S. Fernandez noted that when the nations began injecting members of the public with mRNA shots in early 2021, the Philippines suffered a 43% spike in its mortality rate. “It stands to reason that this very substantial increase in the number of deaths in 2021 could be attributed mainly to either two factors – to COVID-19 infection or to the vaccines themselves,” Fernandez asserted. However, during the hearings, lawmakers heard evidence proving that the deaths were not attributed to the virus, meaning they were caused by the injections. Strikingly, Fernandez admitted in remarks cited by Aussie 17: “We’ve been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandates the pharmaceutical to be responsible. “And now we learn from that mistake.” READ MORE – Rancher Blows Whistle: Food Supply Spiked with mRNA Vaccines Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering. According to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna's shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer's. https://slaynews.com/news/moderna-covid-shots-more-deaths-pfizer-cdc-data/
    SLAYNEWS.COM
    Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows - Slay News
    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 547 Views
  • Israel seeks to rewrite the laws of war
    If the world accepts the way Israel now interprets the principle of proportionality, then genocide will become justified.

    Neve Gordon
    Palestinians look at the debris of tents following an Israeli military strike on the al-Mawasi camp for internally displaced people (IDP), near the city of Khan Yunis
    Palestinians survey the debris of tents following an Israeli bombardment of al-Mawasi camp that killed more than 90 people, in the Gaza Strip on July 13, 2024 [Bashar Taleb/AFP]
    Most people probably don’t know this, but Wikipedia has a page called “List of Israeli assassinations”. It begins in July 1956 and stretches over 68 years until today. The majority on the list are Palestinians; among them are famous Palestinian leaders including Ghassan Kanafani of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine; Fatah’s Khalil Ibrahim al-Wazir – also known as Abu Jihad; Hamas’s Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s Fathi Shaqaqi.

    When looking at the long list, it is impossible not to notice that the number of assassinations and assassination attempts Israel has carried out over the years has increased exponentially: from 14 in the 1970s to well over 150 in the first decade of the new millennium and 24 since January 2020.

    I was reminded of this list when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called a news conference on July 13 to celebrate Israel’s attempt to kill Hamas’s military commander Mohammed Deif in Gaza. Israeli fighter jets and drones had just hammered al-Mawasi camp, which now houses an estimated 80,000 displaced Palestinians living in densely populated tents.

    Within just a few minutes of the fusillade, the pilots had massacred at least 90 Palestinians, including scores of women and children, while injuring an additional 300 people. All of this occurred in an area Israel had previously designated a “safe zone”. As gruesome images of dead bodies charred and shredded to pieces filled social media, reports surfaced that Israel had used several United States-made guided half-tonne bombs.

    In his news conference at the Ministry of Defence headquarters in Tel Aviv just a few hours after this bloodbath, Netanyahu admitted that he was “not absolutely certain” that Deif had been killed but maintained that “just the attempt to assassinate Hamas commanders delivers a message to the world, a message that Hamas’s days are numbered”.

    Yet even a quick perusal of the “List of Israeli assassinations” makes clear that Netanyahu was speaking with a forked tongue. He knows all too well that Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s political leaders Sheik Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi or military leaders Yahya Ayyash and Salah Shehade have done very little to weaken the movement and may well have increased its following.

    If anything, years and years of Israeli assassinations demonstrate that they are primarily used by Israeli leaders to pander to and rally their constituencies. Netanyahu’s recent news conference is no exception.

    But as macabre as the Wikipedia list is, the names on it only tell a partial story. That is because it fails to include the number of civilians killed during each and every successful and failed assassination attempt.

    For example, the July 13 strike was the eighth known attempt on Deif’s life, and it is difficult to calculate the total number of civilians Israel has killed in its scramble to assassinate him. The Wikipedia list fails to capture how the increase in assassinations has led to an exponential increase in civilian deaths.

    This becomes clear when we compare Israel’s current assassination policy with its policy during the second Palestinian Intifada. When Israel assassinated the head of Hamas’s Qassam Brigades, Salah Shehade, in 2002, 15 people were killed, including Shehade, his wife, 15-year-old daughter, and eight other children.

    Sign up for Al Jazeera

    Weekly Newsletter


    protected by reCAPTCHA
    After the strike, there was a public uproar in Israel at the loss of civilian lives, with 27 Israeli pilots signing a letter refusing to fly assassination sorties over Gaza. Almost a decade later, an Israeli commission of inquiry found that due to an “intelligence gathering failure”, commanders had not known that there were civilians present in the adjacent buildings at the time, and had they known they would have called off the attack.

    The commission’s findings are in line with the laws of armed conflict, which allow, or at least tolerate, the killing of civilians not directly participating in hostilities so long as these killings are not “excessive” in relation to the “concrete and direct” military advantage that the belligerent expects to gain from the attack.

    This rule, known as the principle of proportionality, is designed to ensure that the ends of a military operation justify the means by weighing the anticipated military advantage against the expected civilian harm.

    Today, however, we are light years away from the commission’s conclusions both with respect to the repertoires of violence Israel has adopted and the legal justifications it now provides.

    First, Israel’s forms of war-making have changed dramatically since 2002. According to the Israeli organisation Breaking the Silence, which is made up of military veterans, two doctrines have guided the Israeli assaults on Gaza since 2008. The first is the “no casualties doctrine”, which stipulates that, for the sake of protecting Israeli soldiers, Palestinian civilians can be killed with impunity; the second doctrine recommends intentionally attacking civilian sites in order to deter Hamas.

    These doctrines have unsurprisingly led to mass-casualty attacks, which, according to the laws of armed conflict, constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. As a consequence, Israel’s military lawyers have had to modify the way they interpret the laws of armed conflict so that they align with the new warfare strategies.

    If two decades ago killing 14 civilians when assassinating a Hamas leader was considered disproportionate and thus a war crime by the Israeli commission of inquiry, in the first weeks after October 7, the military decided that for every junior Hamas operative, it was permissible to kill up to 15 or 20 civilians. If the target was a senior Hamas official, the military “authorised the killing of more than 100 civilians in the assassination of a single commander”.

    This might seem egregious, but an officer in the International Law Department of the Israeli army was very candid about such changes in a 2009 interview for the newspaper Haaretz: “Our goal of military is not to fetter the army, but to give it the tools to win in a lawful manner.”

    The former head of the department, Colonel Daniel Reisner, also publicly stated this strategy was pursued through “a revision of international law”.

    “If you do something for long enough, the world will accept it,” he said, “The whole of international law is now based on the notion that an act that is forbidden today becomes permissible if executed by enough countries.”

    In other words, the way we calculate proportionality is not determined by some a priori moral edict but rather the norms and customs created by militaries as they adopt new and most often more lethal forms of war-making.

    Again, Netanyahu knows this all too well. He has stated that he personally approved the al-Mawasi strike after receiving satisfactory information on the potential “collateral damage” and the type of ammunition to be used.

    What is clear is that as Israel decimates Gaza and kills tens of thousands of people, it is also attempting to recreate the norms of war-making and significantly transform interpretations of the laws of armed conflict.

    If Netanyahu and his government succeed in rendering Israel’s version of proportionality acceptable among other state actors, then the laws of armed conflict will end up justifying rather than preventing genocidal violence. Indeed, the very architecture of the entire international legal order is now in the balance.

    The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.


    Israel seeks to rewrite the laws of war
    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/7/15/israel-seeks-to-rewrite-the-laws-of-war
    Israel seeks to rewrite the laws of war If the world accepts the way Israel now interprets the principle of proportionality, then genocide will become justified. Neve Gordon Palestinians look at the debris of tents following an Israeli military strike on the al-Mawasi camp for internally displaced people (IDP), near the city of Khan Yunis Palestinians survey the debris of tents following an Israeli bombardment of al-Mawasi camp that killed more than 90 people, in the Gaza Strip on July 13, 2024 [Bashar Taleb/AFP] Most people probably don’t know this, but Wikipedia has a page called “List of Israeli assassinations”. It begins in July 1956 and stretches over 68 years until today. The majority on the list are Palestinians; among them are famous Palestinian leaders including Ghassan Kanafani of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine; Fatah’s Khalil Ibrahim al-Wazir – also known as Abu Jihad; Hamas’s Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad’s Fathi Shaqaqi. When looking at the long list, it is impossible not to notice that the number of assassinations and assassination attempts Israel has carried out over the years has increased exponentially: from 14 in the 1970s to well over 150 in the first decade of the new millennium and 24 since January 2020. I was reminded of this list when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called a news conference on July 13 to celebrate Israel’s attempt to kill Hamas’s military commander Mohammed Deif in Gaza. Israeli fighter jets and drones had just hammered al-Mawasi camp, which now houses an estimated 80,000 displaced Palestinians living in densely populated tents. Within just a few minutes of the fusillade, the pilots had massacred at least 90 Palestinians, including scores of women and children, while injuring an additional 300 people. All of this occurred in an area Israel had previously designated a “safe zone”. As gruesome images of dead bodies charred and shredded to pieces filled social media, reports surfaced that Israel had used several United States-made guided half-tonne bombs. In his news conference at the Ministry of Defence headquarters in Tel Aviv just a few hours after this bloodbath, Netanyahu admitted that he was “not absolutely certain” that Deif had been killed but maintained that “just the attempt to assassinate Hamas commanders delivers a message to the world, a message that Hamas’s days are numbered”. Yet even a quick perusal of the “List of Israeli assassinations” makes clear that Netanyahu was speaking with a forked tongue. He knows all too well that Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s political leaders Sheik Yassin and Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi or military leaders Yahya Ayyash and Salah Shehade have done very little to weaken the movement and may well have increased its following. If anything, years and years of Israeli assassinations demonstrate that they are primarily used by Israeli leaders to pander to and rally their constituencies. Netanyahu’s recent news conference is no exception. But as macabre as the Wikipedia list is, the names on it only tell a partial story. That is because it fails to include the number of civilians killed during each and every successful and failed assassination attempt. For example, the July 13 strike was the eighth known attempt on Deif’s life, and it is difficult to calculate the total number of civilians Israel has killed in its scramble to assassinate him. The Wikipedia list fails to capture how the increase in assassinations has led to an exponential increase in civilian deaths. This becomes clear when we compare Israel’s current assassination policy with its policy during the second Palestinian Intifada. When Israel assassinated the head of Hamas’s Qassam Brigades, Salah Shehade, in 2002, 15 people were killed, including Shehade, his wife, 15-year-old daughter, and eight other children. Sign up for Al Jazeera Weekly Newsletter protected by reCAPTCHA After the strike, there was a public uproar in Israel at the loss of civilian lives, with 27 Israeli pilots signing a letter refusing to fly assassination sorties over Gaza. Almost a decade later, an Israeli commission of inquiry found that due to an “intelligence gathering failure”, commanders had not known that there were civilians present in the adjacent buildings at the time, and had they known they would have called off the attack. The commission’s findings are in line with the laws of armed conflict, which allow, or at least tolerate, the killing of civilians not directly participating in hostilities so long as these killings are not “excessive” in relation to the “concrete and direct” military advantage that the belligerent expects to gain from the attack. This rule, known as the principle of proportionality, is designed to ensure that the ends of a military operation justify the means by weighing the anticipated military advantage against the expected civilian harm. Today, however, we are light years away from the commission’s conclusions both with respect to the repertoires of violence Israel has adopted and the legal justifications it now provides. First, Israel’s forms of war-making have changed dramatically since 2002. According to the Israeli organisation Breaking the Silence, which is made up of military veterans, two doctrines have guided the Israeli assaults on Gaza since 2008. The first is the “no casualties doctrine”, which stipulates that, for the sake of protecting Israeli soldiers, Palestinian civilians can be killed with impunity; the second doctrine recommends intentionally attacking civilian sites in order to deter Hamas. These doctrines have unsurprisingly led to mass-casualty attacks, which, according to the laws of armed conflict, constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. As a consequence, Israel’s military lawyers have had to modify the way they interpret the laws of armed conflict so that they align with the new warfare strategies. If two decades ago killing 14 civilians when assassinating a Hamas leader was considered disproportionate and thus a war crime by the Israeli commission of inquiry, in the first weeks after October 7, the military decided that for every junior Hamas operative, it was permissible to kill up to 15 or 20 civilians. If the target was a senior Hamas official, the military “authorised the killing of more than 100 civilians in the assassination of a single commander”. This might seem egregious, but an officer in the International Law Department of the Israeli army was very candid about such changes in a 2009 interview for the newspaper Haaretz: “Our goal of military is not to fetter the army, but to give it the tools to win in a lawful manner.” The former head of the department, Colonel Daniel Reisner, also publicly stated this strategy was pursued through “a revision of international law”. “If you do something for long enough, the world will accept it,” he said, “The whole of international law is now based on the notion that an act that is forbidden today becomes permissible if executed by enough countries.” In other words, the way we calculate proportionality is not determined by some a priori moral edict but rather the norms and customs created by militaries as they adopt new and most often more lethal forms of war-making. Again, Netanyahu knows this all too well. He has stated that he personally approved the al-Mawasi strike after receiving satisfactory information on the potential “collateral damage” and the type of ammunition to be used. What is clear is that as Israel decimates Gaza and kills tens of thousands of people, it is also attempting to recreate the norms of war-making and significantly transform interpretations of the laws of armed conflict. If Netanyahu and his government succeed in rendering Israel’s version of proportionality acceptable among other state actors, then the laws of armed conflict will end up justifying rather than preventing genocidal violence. Indeed, the very architecture of the entire international legal order is now in the balance. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. Israel seeks to rewrite the laws of war https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/7/15/israel-seeks-to-rewrite-the-laws-of-war
    WWW.ALJAZEERA.COM
    Israel seeks to rewrite the laws of war
    If the world accepts the way Israel now interprets the principle of proportionality, genocide will become justified.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1008 Views
  • Secret Service director gives bizarre reason why an agent wasn't on the roof where gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire on Trump as she rejects calls to resign
    14:52 BST 16 Jul 2024, updated 17:42 BST 16 Jul 2024 By Geoff Earle, Deputy U.S. Political Editor For Dailymail.Com In Milwaukee, Wisconsin

    Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle has finally given an interview
    'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point,' she said
    Embattled Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle has revealed the fateful and bizarre reason why her agency failed to put an agent on the roof gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks used to carry out an assassination attempt on Donald Trump.

    Cheatle, who is facing calls to resign over the massive security failure, said Secret Service officials planning security for Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania considered the warehouse 147 yards away from where Trump spoke to be a risky position for stationing an agent.

    Chilling new details have revealed that a team of local police snipers were inside the building when the 20-year-old Crooks opened fire, shot Trump in the ear and killed a member of the rally crowd.

    Crooks managed to evade cops and Secret Service three times, even though he had been deemed 'suspicious' and could have been on the roof for up to 30 minutes before he pulled the trigger.

    Witnesses also begged law enforcement to act when they saw him clamber onto the roof with his AR-style rifle, but the lapse in security meant he was able to carry out his bid to take the 45th president's life.

    The mistakes that led to Trump being inches away from being killed sparked calls for Cheatle to step down, but she has refused and has now given a baffling explanation as to why there wasn't a presence on the roof that had a clear line of sight to Trump.

    Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle has come forward with her first interview since the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, blaming a sloped roof as the reason to try to secure the building from the inside
    Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle has come forward with her first interview since the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, blaming a sloped roof as the reason to try to secure the building from the inside
    'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,' she told ABC News in an interview Tuesday.

    'And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.'

    What transpired instead was a security nightmare: Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to scale the building and secure his own position, while law enforcement struggled to locate him even amid pressing warnings from members of the Trump crowd. But there wasn't sufficient time to act on the tips, she explained.

    'The shooter was actually identified as a potential person of suspicion,' Cheatle said. 'Unfortunately, with the rapid succession of how things unfolded, by the time that individual was eventually located, they were on the rooftop and were able to fire off at the former president.'

    She was referencing claims by witnesses that they alerted law enforcement about the threat, but agents weren't able to eliminate the threat in time. Officials have pointed to the initial responding officer, who lifted himself up on the roof only to lower himself back when his own life was threatened.

    A government sniper positioned behind Trump while he was speaking took out the would-be assassin, but only after he began firing.

    Cheatle told ABC News her first reaction to the shooting was 'shock.'

    She also said the Secret Service was aware of the security vulnerabilities presented by the building Crooks took a sniper's position on to aim at Trump. However, a decision was made not to place any personnel on the roof – even though security experts have said a primary responsibility of law enforcement would be to secure elevated areas near a high level protectee.

    She also continues to resist calls that she step down over the incident, even while taking responsibility for her agency.

    'The buck stops with me,' she said.

    'It was unacceptable,' she told ABC. 'And it's something that shouldn't happen again.'


    Watch events unfold during assassination attempt on Donald Trump




    Cheatle is already facing calls to step down amid what some are calling a 'massive security failure'
    Cheatle is already facing calls to step down amid what some are calling a 'massive security failure'

    Donald Trump supporters alert police about gunman

    Read More

    Ex-President enters RNC with beefed-up 15-strong troupe of bodyguards


    article image
    Ex-FBI special agent Kenneth Gray told DailyMail.com on Monday that the Secret Service 'really screwed up' at the rally on Saturday and that efforts to hire more women in field roles may well have played a role.

    Republican officials gathering in Milwaukee have been calling for tough scrutiny of the agency even as the feds are implementing tighter security measures around Trump and other protectees.

    ‘Somebody, somewhere has a really, really a lot of serious questions to have to answer,’ House Judiciary and ‘Weaponization’ committee member Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota told DailyMail.com.

    Cheatle's decision to avoid questions until now has also drawn astonishment. She was not present at the initial press conference headed by the FBI.

    The probe set up by President Joe Biden after the incident is being overseen by the Justice Department, not Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service.

    'That speaks volumes,’ former House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz told DailyMail.com.

    President Biden was asked by NBC Monday whether he has confidence in the Secret Service.

    'I feel safe with the Secret Service. But look ... what we did see was the Secret Service who responded risked their lives responding. They were ready to give their lives for the president. The question is should they have anticipated what happened. Should they have done what they needed to do to prevent this from happening? That's the question that's an open question.'

    He didn't respond directly when NBC's Lester Holt asked him if the agency suffered a 'massive security failure.'

    Republicans preparing to grill Cheatle have already focused on her own background. Before being appointed by President Biden in 2022, she worked for PepsiCo as senior director in Global Security. She worked for 25 years in the agency and in the Vice Presidential Protective Division.

    Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Ky.) on Fox News has called her a 'diversity hire.'

    'You know she was working at Pepsi before this. I know she was a former CIA Secret Service agent, but still, this is what happens when you don’t put the best players in,' he said.

    Cheatle came in to steady an agency that has been rocked by a series of scandals.

    'Somebody really dropped the ball. You’ve got a DEI person, a DEI initiative person who heads up our Secret Service,' he said, using the abbreviation for diversity, equity and inclusion.

    On Monday night it was revealed a local team of police snipers team saw Crooks scouting their command post three times in the minutes before the shooting began.

    Thomas Matthew Crooks, seen here in a 2021 photo, was identified by the FBI as the shooter involved the assassination attempt
    Thomas Matthew Crooks, seen here in a 2021 photo, was identified by the FBI as the shooter involved the assassination attempt
    Three police marksmen from Beaver County were using the single-story AGR International building as their watch-post when the would-be assassin chose it as his place to shoot from, CBS reported.

    A law enforcement official told the channel said that no action was taken after one of the snipers first spotted Crooks looking up at the roof of the building in Butler, Pennsylvania , just 130 yards from where the president would speak.

    The sniper then radioed to a command post after seeing Crooks take out a rangefinder.

    But no further action was taken before Crooks reappeared a third time, this time wearing a backpack and disappearing from sight as he walked to the back of the building.

    A further radio report relaying the information was submitted by the sniper team who did not realize that Crooks was now scaling their building.

    Bullets fired from a manufacturing building roof, right, into the rally, seen left, show just how close Crooks had managed to get the former president
    Bullets fired from a manufacturing building roof, right, into the rally, seen left, show just how close Crooks had managed to get the former president
    A chance turn of Trump¿s head, not the swift response of those snipers, is what made the difference between a grazing glance of the bullet Crooks fired and a fatal shot
    A chance turn of Trump¿s head, not the swift response of those snipers, is what made the difference between a grazing glance of the bullet Crooks fired and a fatal shot
    Eight members of the Beaver County Police Department had been tasked with securing the outer perimeter of the rally, while the Secret Service concentrated on the rally itself.

    Pittsburgh's WPXI reported that a Beaver officer took a photo after seeing Crooks on the roof at 5.45pm, by which time he had already been photographed on the ground by a colleague.

    The final radio report by the three-strong sniper team prompted State police to send reinforcements to the building but it was not until 6.11pm that one climbed onto the roof and saw Crooks with his rifle.

    The officer from Butler County was forced to retreat when Crooks aimed his AR-style weapon at him, and it was seconds later that the killer unleashed up to eight shots, killing Pennsylvania fire chief Corey Comperatore, critically injuring two others and hitting Trump in the right ear.

    It is not clear whether Crooks had the rifle on him when he was first seen outside the AGR International factory building, or if he stayed on the roof for the whole time.

    Extraordinary photos and video obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com show just how breathtakingly close Crooks, got to his target.

    Crooks, 20, came within inches of killing President Trump Saturday, as the former president addressed supporters during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania.

    Chillingly some images show a ladder, hidden by dense shrubbery, propped against the side of the AGR building, leading directly to the rooftop across which witnesses later told law enforcement they saw Crooks scramble.

    The images of the strategically placed ladder have emerged as Secret Service admit they did not sweep the building where the shooter took his position, but instead entrusted that role to local law enforcement officers.

    Now, these compelling images hammer home the handful of yards – barely 150 - that stood between the former president and his would-be assassin.

    Crooks had parked his vehicle near the rally site in Butler on Saturday before he scaled the roof of a nearby industrial manufacturing building.


    If you're looking for the link to the quote from Secret Service director Kim Cheatle, making bizarre excuses for why that roof was left completely uncovered, it's here:
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13639613/Secret-Service-director-wasnt-roof-gunman.html

    And the relevant quote is: 'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,' she told ABC News in an interview Tuesday. 'And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.'

    Sounds like a cover story. I think Cheatle was in on the assassination. This was an INSIDE JOB. Cheatle should RESIGN immediately and then be criminally investigated.
    Secret Service director gives bizarre reason why an agent wasn't on the roof where gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks opened fire on Trump as she rejects calls to resign 14:52 BST 16 Jul 2024, updated 17:42 BST 16 Jul 2024 By Geoff Earle, Deputy U.S. Political Editor For Dailymail.Com In Milwaukee, Wisconsin Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle has finally given an interview 'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point,' she said Embattled Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle has revealed the fateful and bizarre reason why her agency failed to put an agent on the roof gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks used to carry out an assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Cheatle, who is facing calls to resign over the massive security failure, said Secret Service officials planning security for Trump's rally in Butler, Pennsylvania considered the warehouse 147 yards away from where Trump spoke to be a risky position for stationing an agent. Chilling new details have revealed that a team of local police snipers were inside the building when the 20-year-old Crooks opened fire, shot Trump in the ear and killed a member of the rally crowd. Crooks managed to evade cops and Secret Service three times, even though he had been deemed 'suspicious' and could have been on the roof for up to 30 minutes before he pulled the trigger. Witnesses also begged law enforcement to act when they saw him clamber onto the roof with his AR-style rifle, but the lapse in security meant he was able to carry out his bid to take the 45th president's life. The mistakes that led to Trump being inches away from being killed sparked calls for Cheatle to step down, but she has refused and has now given a baffling explanation as to why there wasn't a presence on the roof that had a clear line of sight to Trump. Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle has come forward with her first interview since the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, blaming a sloped roof as the reason to try to secure the building from the inside Secret Service Kimberly Cheatle has come forward with her first interview since the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, blaming a sloped roof as the reason to try to secure the building from the inside 'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,' she told ABC News in an interview Tuesday. 'And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.' What transpired instead was a security nightmare: Thomas Matthew Crooks was able to scale the building and secure his own position, while law enforcement struggled to locate him even amid pressing warnings from members of the Trump crowd. But there wasn't sufficient time to act on the tips, she explained. 'The shooter was actually identified as a potential person of suspicion,' Cheatle said. 'Unfortunately, with the rapid succession of how things unfolded, by the time that individual was eventually located, they were on the rooftop and were able to fire off at the former president.' She was referencing claims by witnesses that they alerted law enforcement about the threat, but agents weren't able to eliminate the threat in time. Officials have pointed to the initial responding officer, who lifted himself up on the roof only to lower himself back when his own life was threatened. A government sniper positioned behind Trump while he was speaking took out the would-be assassin, but only after he began firing. Cheatle told ABC News her first reaction to the shooting was 'shock.' She also said the Secret Service was aware of the security vulnerabilities presented by the building Crooks took a sniper's position on to aim at Trump. However, a decision was made not to place any personnel on the roof – even though security experts have said a primary responsibility of law enforcement would be to secure elevated areas near a high level protectee. She also continues to resist calls that she step down over the incident, even while taking responsibility for her agency. 'The buck stops with me,' she said. 'It was unacceptable,' she told ABC. 'And it's something that shouldn't happen again.' Watch events unfold during assassination attempt on Donald Trump Cheatle is already facing calls to step down amid what some are calling a 'massive security failure' Cheatle is already facing calls to step down amid what some are calling a 'massive security failure' Donald Trump supporters alert police about gunman Read More Ex-President enters RNC with beefed-up 15-strong troupe of bodyguards article image Ex-FBI special agent Kenneth Gray told DailyMail.com on Monday that the Secret Service 'really screwed up' at the rally on Saturday and that efforts to hire more women in field roles may well have played a role. Republican officials gathering in Milwaukee have been calling for tough scrutiny of the agency even as the feds are implementing tighter security measures around Trump and other protectees. ‘Somebody, somewhere has a really, really a lot of serious questions to have to answer,’ House Judiciary and ‘Weaponization’ committee member Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota told DailyMail.com. Cheatle's decision to avoid questions until now has also drawn astonishment. She was not present at the initial press conference headed by the FBI. The probe set up by President Joe Biden after the incident is being overseen by the Justice Department, not Homeland Security, which oversees the Secret Service. 'That speaks volumes,’ former House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz told DailyMail.com. President Biden was asked by NBC Monday whether he has confidence in the Secret Service. 'I feel safe with the Secret Service. But look ... what we did see was the Secret Service who responded risked their lives responding. They were ready to give their lives for the president. The question is should they have anticipated what happened. Should they have done what they needed to do to prevent this from happening? That's the question that's an open question.' He didn't respond directly when NBC's Lester Holt asked him if the agency suffered a 'massive security failure.' Republicans preparing to grill Cheatle have already focused on her own background. Before being appointed by President Biden in 2022, she worked for PepsiCo as senior director in Global Security. She worked for 25 years in the agency and in the Vice Presidential Protective Division. Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Ky.) on Fox News has called her a 'diversity hire.' 'You know she was working at Pepsi before this. I know she was a former CIA Secret Service agent, but still, this is what happens when you don’t put the best players in,' he said. Cheatle came in to steady an agency that has been rocked by a series of scandals. 'Somebody really dropped the ball. You’ve got a DEI person, a DEI initiative person who heads up our Secret Service,' he said, using the abbreviation for diversity, equity and inclusion. On Monday night it was revealed a local team of police snipers team saw Crooks scouting their command post three times in the minutes before the shooting began. Thomas Matthew Crooks, seen here in a 2021 photo, was identified by the FBI as the shooter involved the assassination attempt Thomas Matthew Crooks, seen here in a 2021 photo, was identified by the FBI as the shooter involved the assassination attempt Three police marksmen from Beaver County were using the single-story AGR International building as their watch-post when the would-be assassin chose it as his place to shoot from, CBS reported. A law enforcement official told the channel said that no action was taken after one of the snipers first spotted Crooks looking up at the roof of the building in Butler, Pennsylvania , just 130 yards from where the president would speak. The sniper then radioed to a command post after seeing Crooks take out a rangefinder. But no further action was taken before Crooks reappeared a third time, this time wearing a backpack and disappearing from sight as he walked to the back of the building. A further radio report relaying the information was submitted by the sniper team who did not realize that Crooks was now scaling their building. Bullets fired from a manufacturing building roof, right, into the rally, seen left, show just how close Crooks had managed to get the former president Bullets fired from a manufacturing building roof, right, into the rally, seen left, show just how close Crooks had managed to get the former president A chance turn of Trump¿s head, not the swift response of those snipers, is what made the difference between a grazing glance of the bullet Crooks fired and a fatal shot A chance turn of Trump¿s head, not the swift response of those snipers, is what made the difference between a grazing glance of the bullet Crooks fired and a fatal shot Eight members of the Beaver County Police Department had been tasked with securing the outer perimeter of the rally, while the Secret Service concentrated on the rally itself. Pittsburgh's WPXI reported that a Beaver officer took a photo after seeing Crooks on the roof at 5.45pm, by which time he had already been photographed on the ground by a colleague. The final radio report by the three-strong sniper team prompted State police to send reinforcements to the building but it was not until 6.11pm that one climbed onto the roof and saw Crooks with his rifle. The officer from Butler County was forced to retreat when Crooks aimed his AR-style weapon at him, and it was seconds later that the killer unleashed up to eight shots, killing Pennsylvania fire chief Corey Comperatore, critically injuring two others and hitting Trump in the right ear. It is not clear whether Crooks had the rifle on him when he was first seen outside the AGR International factory building, or if he stayed on the roof for the whole time. Extraordinary photos and video obtained exclusively by DailyMail.com show just how breathtakingly close Crooks, got to his target. Crooks, 20, came within inches of killing President Trump Saturday, as the former president addressed supporters during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Chillingly some images show a ladder, hidden by dense shrubbery, propped against the side of the AGR building, leading directly to the rooftop across which witnesses later told law enforcement they saw Crooks scramble. The images of the strategically placed ladder have emerged as Secret Service admit they did not sweep the building where the shooter took his position, but instead entrusted that role to local law enforcement officers. Now, these compelling images hammer home the handful of yards – barely 150 - that stood between the former president and his would-be assassin. Crooks had parked his vehicle near the rally site in Butler on Saturday before he scaled the roof of a nearby industrial manufacturing building. If you're looking for the link to the quote from Secret Service director Kim Cheatle, making bizarre excuses for why that roof was left completely uncovered, it's here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13639613/Secret-Service-director-wasnt-roof-gunman.html And the relevant quote is: 'That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,' she told ABC News in an interview Tuesday. 'And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside.' Sounds like a cover story. I think Cheatle was in on the assassination. This was an INSIDE JOB. Cheatle should RESIGN immediately and then be criminally investigated.
    WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK
    Secret Service boss cites hazard of putting agent on 'sloped roof'
    Embattled Secret Service head Kimberly Cheatle said in an interview the 'buck stops' with her, and said a decision was made not to post an agent on a 'sloped roof' that a shooter used to fire on Trump.
    Haha
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 640 Views
  • VAERS data shows Moderna causes 30% more deaths per dose than Pfizer
    I've known since 2021 that Moderna was more deadly on a per shot basis than Pfizer. Here's what the VAERS data shows. I'm going to show you on Tuesday that VAERS got it right.

    Ernest Ramirez on X: "My good byes to my Baby Boy https://t.co/TQsbhG3aqp" / X
    We FINALLY have the gold-standard official state government data that proves the mRNA vaccines increased all-cause mortality. The younger were disproportionately affected. So many children were killed due to the negligence of the FDA and CDC who refuse to look at the safety evidence like the Czech Republic data.
    Executive summary

    In this article, I want to prove to you that Moderna generates 30% more death reports in VAERS than Pfizer.

    There is no way you can explain this other than the Moderna shots were more deadly than the Pfizer shots.

    This is very important because in my next article, I’m going to show you gold-standard evidence that the VAERS data was the canary in the coal mine that everyone in mainstream medicine chose to ignore.

    Outline of this article

    Show the ratio of doses between Pfizer and Moderna delivered in the US

    Show the ratio of death reports in VAERS associated with Pfizer vs. Modern

    Divide 1 by 2.

    Answer: 1.3 (30% higher deaths per dose)

    This isn’t rocket science.

    Introduction

    Very early in the pandemic, before I wrote my first Substack article, I was writing documents analyzing the VAERS data like this one.

    As part of the research for that article, I did VAERS queries that showed on a per shot basis that Moderna killed around 50% more people than Pfizer. And J&J was even worse than Moderna.

    I’m going to show you here that my original calculations still hold up by trying to recreate my original work (because I can’t find the original calculations).

    The reason this is so important is that now, using a new technique (comparing ACM rates of the different vaccine brands that were distributed to the Czech Republic population based on availability), I can now prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the COVID vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots.

    But first, I want to show you that the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer.

    This has been known since the very start of the pandemic, but the medical community chose to ignore it.

    Moderna has disproportionately higher deaths reports in VAERS from the shots

    The propensity to report a death in VAERS is independent of vaccine brand.

    So if you have a disproportionately higher mortality rate, it’s nearly a certainty that your vaccine has to be unsafe.

    It turns out that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna, but it only has 21% more deaths. The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer.

    Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster.

    The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE.

    Not a single country will look at their own safety data. If they did, they could quickly validate this. I’ll even supply the source code. For free!

    Here’s the rollout data for Pfizer vs. Moderna


    The more accurate graph is the OWID graph, but Pfizer/Moderna ratio is nearly unchanged:


    Here is the death count in VAERS for Moderna


    Note: The number to pay attention to is the number at the top. The numbers in the tables count duplicates.
    Here is the death count in VAERS for Pfizer

    Pay attention only to the number after the “Found … cases where…” The counts have duplicates.


    Here’s the math for the 30% increase in reported deaths from Moderna vs Pfizer per VAERS data

    Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux
    Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
    >>> mod_deaths=3714
    >>> pfizer_death=4507
    >>> pfizer_doses=366
    >>> mod_doses=232
    >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses
    1.5775862068965518
    >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths
    1.2135164243403338
    >>> 1.57/1.21
    1.297520661157025
    We know Pfizer isn’t safe either because 85% of all deaths in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF VAERS are from the COVID vaccines

    It could be that the 30% ratio in VAERS is just excess deaths and if Pfizer increases ACM by .01% then a vaccine that increases ACM by .013% is no big deal.

    But this just isn’t the case. Not even close. I’ve never in my life seen a vaccine that has created so many vaccine deaths and injuries. And most of them are from the Pfizer vaccine.

    This is trivial to do in VAERS. Only one vaccine is unsafe. Can you spot it?


    Other vaccines have far more doses than the COVID vaccines, but the COVID vaccines are the worst as far as reported deaths. How can they explain that?

    And in the gold standard Pfizer clinical trial, the deaths in the vaccine group were at all times higher than the placebo group. If the vaccine was safe, this is highly unlikely… they would have switched positions randomly.

    Why aren’t health authorities taking action? Because health authorities refuse to look at their own data AND the CDC refuses to request it from them!

    On the VSRF call on July 11, 2024, we learned first hand that public health epidemiologists who blow whistles are rewarded by being fired and/or being faced with false criminal charges.

    Any health authority who has record level data (which they all do AFAIK) could have done this analysis but they all choose to not look at their own data. They all assured us the vaccine was safe without examining their own data to back up their statements. They misled the public.

    AFAIK, not a single health authority has looked at the ACM rates 1 year from the time of the shot of the different brands of vaccines. They all looked the other way and ignored their own data.

    Have you ever seen a 1 year mortality comparison of vaccine brands published by a public health office? Of course not. They don’t look at their data.

    Take Health New Zealand for example. When their DBA Barry Young pointed out that the data they collected showed the COVID vaccines were killing people (a fact easily evident from the time-series cohort analysis graphs showing an upward slope after the shot no matter what season it was given), they fired him and pressed criminal charges against him. To date, they have never produced an analysis of their data from the epidemiologists proving that Barry got it wrong. Why not?

    The CDC is even worse… they didn’t even want to SEE the data and refuse to request it from the States. I know this because I had a face to face discussion with the head of media relations of the CDC Ben Haynes. I kept asking him why they didn’t request the data from the states and he said it is because Congress doesn’t give the CDC authority to request the data from the states. I said, “Have you tried asking nicely?” and he just repeated his previous statement.

    Here’s an example. When I tried to get the Santa Clara County Public Health Department to explain why they said nothing when their own data showed that the COVID vaccines made things worse, they ignored me. When I had a County Supervisor ask, they told him “No comment.” When I escalated to the CEO’s office of Santa Clara County, they gave him the same “No comment” which my contact there said was a perfectly fine response to my query.

    On June 30, 2024, a friend told me about this record level data legally from the Czech Republic government. It’s all the records for the entire country. It took me less than 2 days to analyze it and another week to make sure there were no flaws. And the results are devastating.

    All the doctors who told you that the Moderna vaccine was safe misled you. And the media, lawmakers, public health officials, and US Presidents all told you this shit was safe without hard data showing it was safe. And they didn’t want to monitor the safety because they didn’t want egg on their face.

    They all misled you.

    The Czech gold-standard data shows there was no possible way these “vaccines” were ever safe. No confounders. No more doubt now.

    Next steps: Write up for a peer-reviewed journal

    I’ll be writing up the Czech data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will be revealing all the code to crunch the numbers and analyze the results this week.

    What was amazing was how many people turned me down as a co-author on that paper saying it would ruin their career. What does that tell you?

    So it’s not about telling people the truth; science today is about making sure you don’t tell the truth so you can keep your job.

    They need to stop ignoring the data and take a stand

    Everyone who has supported the “vaccine is safe” narrative should make a choice: either endorse what I’ve done or show how it is wrong and what the correct answer is.

    Remember: the first rule of holes is when you find yourself in one, stop digging.

    And the least they can all do is call for data transparency of public health data. The data released by the Czech Republic should be regularly released by every public health agency in the world instead of being kept hidden.

    How does hiding the data save lives??

    Summary

    In this article, I showed that VAERS has been telling anyone who will listen that the Moderna shots are not safe.

    In my next article, I will reveal the official government data from the Czech Republic that nobody wants to see. Why? Because it proves they were all wrong.

    This is a train wreck.

    The end is near.

    And if you like my work and want to say “thanks” for the 1,500 Substack articles exposing the corruption over the past 3 years, please consider subscribing. I’d appreciate it as it allows me to afford to focus full time on exposing the truth. Thanks!!

    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/vaers-data-shows-moderna-causes-30
    VAERS data shows Moderna causes 30% more deaths per dose than Pfizer I've known since 2021 that Moderna was more deadly on a per shot basis than Pfizer. Here's what the VAERS data shows. I'm going to show you on Tuesday that VAERS got it right. Ernest Ramirez on X: "My good byes to my Baby Boy 💔💔💔 https://t.co/TQsbhG3aqp" / X We FINALLY have the gold-standard official state government data that proves the mRNA vaccines increased all-cause mortality. The younger were disproportionately affected. So many children were killed due to the negligence of the FDA and CDC who refuse to look at the safety evidence like the Czech Republic data. Executive summary In this article, I want to prove to you that Moderna generates 30% more death reports in VAERS than Pfizer. There is no way you can explain this other than the Moderna shots were more deadly than the Pfizer shots. This is very important because in my next article, I’m going to show you gold-standard evidence that the VAERS data was the canary in the coal mine that everyone in mainstream medicine chose to ignore. Outline of this article Show the ratio of doses between Pfizer and Moderna delivered in the US Show the ratio of death reports in VAERS associated with Pfizer vs. Modern Divide 1 by 2. Answer: 1.3 (30% higher deaths per dose) This isn’t rocket science. Introduction Very early in the pandemic, before I wrote my first Substack article, I was writing documents analyzing the VAERS data like this one. As part of the research for that article, I did VAERS queries that showed on a per shot basis that Moderna killed around 50% more people than Pfizer. And J&J was even worse than Moderna. I’m going to show you here that my original calculations still hold up by trying to recreate my original work (because I can’t find the original calculations). The reason this is so important is that now, using a new technique (comparing ACM rates of the different vaccine brands that were distributed to the Czech Republic population based on availability), I can now prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the COVID vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots. But first, I want to show you that the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer. This has been known since the very start of the pandemic, but the medical community chose to ignore it. Moderna has disproportionately higher deaths reports in VAERS from the shots The propensity to report a death in VAERS is independent of vaccine brand. So if you have a disproportionately higher mortality rate, it’s nearly a certainty that your vaccine has to be unsafe. It turns out that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna, but it only has 21% more deaths. The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer. Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster. The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE. Not a single country will look at their own safety data. If they did, they could quickly validate this. I’ll even supply the source code. For free! Here’s the rollout data for Pfizer vs. Moderna The more accurate graph is the OWID graph, but Pfizer/Moderna ratio is nearly unchanged: Here is the death count in VAERS for Moderna Note: The number to pay attention to is the number at the top. The numbers in the tables count duplicates. Here is the death count in VAERS for Pfizer Pay attention only to the number after the “Found … cases where…” The counts have duplicates. Here’s the math for the 30% increase in reported deaths from Moderna vs Pfizer per VAERS data Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> mod_deaths=3714 >>> pfizer_death=4507 >>> pfizer_doses=366 >>> mod_doses=232 >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses 1.5775862068965518 >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths 1.2135164243403338 >>> 1.57/1.21 1.297520661157025 We know Pfizer isn’t safe either because 85% of all deaths in the ENTIRE HISTORY OF VAERS are from the COVID vaccines It could be that the 30% ratio in VAERS is just excess deaths and if Pfizer increases ACM by .01% then a vaccine that increases ACM by .013% is no big deal. But this just isn’t the case. Not even close. I’ve never in my life seen a vaccine that has created so many vaccine deaths and injuries. And most of them are from the Pfizer vaccine. This is trivial to do in VAERS. Only one vaccine is unsafe. Can you spot it? Other vaccines have far more doses than the COVID vaccines, but the COVID vaccines are the worst as far as reported deaths. How can they explain that? And in the gold standard Pfizer clinical trial, the deaths in the vaccine group were at all times higher than the placebo group. If the vaccine was safe, this is highly unlikely… they would have switched positions randomly. Why aren’t health authorities taking action? Because health authorities refuse to look at their own data AND the CDC refuses to request it from them! On the VSRF call on July 11, 2024, we learned first hand that public health epidemiologists who blow whistles are rewarded by being fired and/or being faced with false criminal charges. Any health authority who has record level data (which they all do AFAIK) could have done this analysis but they all choose to not look at their own data. They all assured us the vaccine was safe without examining their own data to back up their statements. They misled the public. AFAIK, not a single health authority has looked at the ACM rates 1 year from the time of the shot of the different brands of vaccines. They all looked the other way and ignored their own data. Have you ever seen a 1 year mortality comparison of vaccine brands published by a public health office? Of course not. They don’t look at their data. Take Health New Zealand for example. When their DBA Barry Young pointed out that the data they collected showed the COVID vaccines were killing people (a fact easily evident from the time-series cohort analysis graphs showing an upward slope after the shot no matter what season it was given), they fired him and pressed criminal charges against him. To date, they have never produced an analysis of their data from the epidemiologists proving that Barry got it wrong. Why not? The CDC is even worse… they didn’t even want to SEE the data and refuse to request it from the States. I know this because I had a face to face discussion with the head of media relations of the CDC Ben Haynes. I kept asking him why they didn’t request the data from the states and he said it is because Congress doesn’t give the CDC authority to request the data from the states. I said, “Have you tried asking nicely?” and he just repeated his previous statement. Here’s an example. When I tried to get the Santa Clara County Public Health Department to explain why they said nothing when their own data showed that the COVID vaccines made things worse, they ignored me. When I had a County Supervisor ask, they told him “No comment.” When I escalated to the CEO’s office of Santa Clara County, they gave him the same “No comment” which my contact there said was a perfectly fine response to my query. On June 30, 2024, a friend told me about this record level data legally from the Czech Republic government. It’s all the records for the entire country. It took me less than 2 days to analyze it and another week to make sure there were no flaws. And the results are devastating. All the doctors who told you that the Moderna vaccine was safe misled you. And the media, lawmakers, public health officials, and US Presidents all told you this shit was safe without hard data showing it was safe. And they didn’t want to monitor the safety because they didn’t want egg on their face. They all misled you. The Czech gold-standard data shows there was no possible way these “vaccines” were ever safe. No confounders. No more doubt now. Next steps: Write up for a peer-reviewed journal I’ll be writing up the Czech data for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will be revealing all the code to crunch the numbers and analyze the results this week. What was amazing was how many people turned me down as a co-author on that paper saying it would ruin their career. What does that tell you? So it’s not about telling people the truth; science today is about making sure you don’t tell the truth so you can keep your job. They need to stop ignoring the data and take a stand Everyone who has supported the “vaccine is safe” narrative should make a choice: either endorse what I’ve done or show how it is wrong and what the correct answer is. Remember: the first rule of holes is when you find yourself in one, stop digging. And the least they can all do is call for data transparency of public health data. The data released by the Czech Republic should be regularly released by every public health agency in the world instead of being kept hidden. How does hiding the data save lives?? Summary In this article, I showed that VAERS has been telling anyone who will listen that the Moderna shots are not safe. In my next article, I will reveal the official government data from the Czech Republic that nobody wants to see. Why? Because it proves they were all wrong. This is a train wreck. The end is near. And if you like my work and want to say “thanks” for the 1,500 Substack articles exposing the corruption over the past 3 years, please consider subscribing. I’d appreciate it as it allows me to afford to focus full time on exposing the truth. Thanks!! https://kirschsubstack.com/p/vaers-data-shows-moderna-causes-30
    KIRSCHSUBSTACK.COM
    VAERS data shows Moderna causes 30% more deaths per dose than Pfizer
    I've known since 2021 that Moderna was more deadly on a per shot basis than Pfizer. Here's what the VAERS data shows. I'm going to show you on Tuesday that VAERS got it right.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 1043 Views
  • Fake usdt generator | Flash USDT Software | Fake usdt transaction generator

    Fake usdt generator is a term given to applications that are used to create fake USDT transactions on the blockchain network. Flash usdt generator applications uses sophisticated crypto technology to create fake USDT transactions. There is a limit to how much flash USDT can be generated by these applications on daily basis. Some of the USDT generator applications can send up to $500k in fake USDT tokens as well as some can send just about $100k flash USDT or less per day. Some other applications can't send flash Tether on the blockchain network. https://globalflashco.com/

    Looking for the latest release of Flash USDT Transaction software? Check out the full version of our USDT flashing software available at GLOBALFLASHCO. Get ready to experience fast and hassle-free USDT flashing with our powerful and advanced software. With our new version, you can effortlessly perform secure and efficient USDT transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity to upgrade your trading game. Visit https://globalflashco.com/ now to get your hands on the new Flash USDT Transaction software.
    How fake usdt transfer app works | How to send a fake usdt transfer
    It's very simple to send a fake usdt transfer. The only thing needed is a software and that's all, you're good to go. The fake usdt transfer software is built in way that is very friendly and easy to use making easy for anyone to send flash USDT as they please.

    We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version.

    We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE. https://globalflashco.com/

    FEATURES OF OUR FLASH USDT SOFTWARE 
     
     • The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it.
     • The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times.
     • TAnd the third difference is that Flash USD can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days
     • You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days
     • Comes with a lifetime activation key
     • You can send a max of 175,000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    Fake usdt generator | Flash USDT Software | Fake usdt transaction generator Fake usdt generator is a term given to applications that are used to create fake USDT transactions on the blockchain network. Flash usdt generator applications uses sophisticated crypto technology to create fake USDT transactions. There is a limit to how much flash USDT can be generated by these applications on daily basis. Some of the USDT generator applications can send up to $500k in fake USDT tokens as well as some can send just about $100k flash USDT or less per day. Some other applications can't send flash Tether on the blockchain network. https://globalflashco.com/ Looking for the latest release of Flash USDT Transaction software? Check out the full version of our USDT flashing software available at GLOBALFLASHCO. Get ready to experience fast and hassle-free USDT flashing with our powerful and advanced software. With our new version, you can effortlessly perform secure and efficient USDT transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity to upgrade your trading game. Visit https://globalflashco.com/ now to get your hands on the new Flash USDT Transaction software. How fake usdt transfer app works | How to send a fake usdt transfer It's very simple to send a fake usdt transfer. The only thing needed is a software and that's all, you're good to go. The fake usdt transfer software is built in way that is very friendly and easy to use making easy for anyone to send flash USDT as they please. We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version. We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE. https://globalflashco.com/ FEATURES OF OUR FLASH USDT SOFTWARE     • The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it.  • The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times.  • TAnd the third difference is that Flash USD can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days  • You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days  • Comes with a lifetime activation key  • You can send a max of 175,000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    GLOBALFLASHCO.COM
    Flash Bitcoin Software
    Flash BTC Transaction ! are you Looking for a simple way to send fake bitcoins for free? Check out Flash bitcoin transaction software on globalflashco. This bitcoin fork operates on the bitcoin network and allows you to generate bitcoin that can be easily sent to any wallet address. Experience the convenience and efficiency of this Flash bitcoin generator and take control of your transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity, visitglobalflashco today and explore the possibilities with Flash bitcoins.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 411 Views
  • Flash USDT Generator Software

    Are you in search of how to Flash coins on the blockchain, Binance, Coinbase, and other wallet networks, this flashing USDT can stay in any wallet for a maximum of 90 days before being rejected by the blockchain network and finally disappearing from the wallet it was sent to?

    We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version. https://globalflashco.com/


    We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE.https://globalflashco.com/

    FEATURES OF OUR FLASH COIN

    1), The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it.

    2), The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times.

    3), And the third difference is that Flash USDT can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 90 days

    4) You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days

    5) Comes with a lifetime activation key

    7) You can send a max of 1500000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    Flash USDT Generator Software Are you in search of how to Flash coins on the blockchain, Binance, Coinbase, and other wallet networks, this flashing USDT can stay in any wallet for a maximum of 90 days before being rejected by the blockchain network and finally disappearing from the wallet it was sent to? We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version. https://globalflashco.com/ We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE.https://globalflashco.com/ FEATURES OF OUR FLASH COIN 1), The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it. 2), The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times. 3), And the third difference is that Flash USDT can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 90 days 4) You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days 5) Comes with a lifetime activation key 7) You can send a max of 1500000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    GLOBALFLASHCO.COM
    Flash Bitcoin Software
    Flash BTC Transaction ! are you Looking for a simple way to send fake bitcoins for free? Check out Flash bitcoin transaction software on globalflashco. This bitcoin fork operates on the bitcoin network and allows you to generate bitcoin that can be easily sent to any wallet address. Experience the convenience and efficiency of this Flash bitcoin generator and take control of your transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity, visitglobalflashco today and explore the possibilities with Flash bitcoins.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 275 Views
  • Are you in search of how to Flash coins on the blockchain, Binance, Coinbase, and other wallet networks, this flashing bitcoin can stay in any wallet for a maximum of 50 days before being rejected by the blockchain network and finally disappearing from the wallet it was sent to?

    We present you the new version of Flash BTC Transaction software, bitcoin flashing software Full Version. https://globalflashco.com/

    We are the Best Bitcoin Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE.

    FEATURES OF OUR FLASH COIN

    1), The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 50 days from the date you received it.

    2), The second difference is that Flash BTC cannot be transferred more than 12 times.

    3), And the third difference is that Flash BTC can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days

    4) You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 50 days

    5) Comes with a lifetime activation key

    6) You can send a max of 100btc daily https://globalflashco.com/
    Are you in search of how to Flash coins on the blockchain, Binance, Coinbase, and other wallet networks, this flashing bitcoin can stay in any wallet for a maximum of 50 days before being rejected by the blockchain network and finally disappearing from the wallet it was sent to? We present you the new version of Flash BTC Transaction software, bitcoin flashing software Full Version. https://globalflashco.com/ We are the Best Bitcoin Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE. FEATURES OF OUR FLASH COIN 1), The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 50 days from the date you received it. 2), The second difference is that Flash BTC cannot be transferred more than 12 times. 3), And the third difference is that Flash BTC can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days 4) You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 50 days 5) Comes with a lifetime activation key 6) You can send a max of 100btc daily https://globalflashco.com/
    GLOBALFLASHCO.COM
    Flash Bitcoin Software
    Flash BTC Transaction ! are you Looking for a simple way to send fake bitcoins for free? Check out Flash bitcoin transaction software on globalflashco. This bitcoin fork operates on the bitcoin network and allows you to generate bitcoin that can be easily sent to any wallet address. Experience the convenience and efficiency of this Flash bitcoin generator and take control of your transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity, visitglobalflashco today and explore the possibilities with Flash bitcoins.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 276 Views
  • Fake usdt generator | Flash USDT Software | Fake usdt transaction generator

    Fake usdt generator is a term given to applications that are used to create fake USDT transactions on the blockchain network. Flash usdt generator applications uses sophisticated crypto technology to create fake USDT transactions. There is a limit to how much flash USDT can be generated by these applications on daily basis. Some of the USDT generator applications can send up to $500k in fake USDT tokens as well as some can send just about $100k flash USDT or less per day. Some other applications can't send flash Tether on the blockchain network. https://globalflashco.com/

    Looking for the latest release of Flash USDT Transaction software? Check out the full version of our USDT flashing software available at GLOBALFLASHCO. Get ready to experience fast and hassle-free USDT flashing with our powerful and advanced software. With our new version, you can effortlessly perform secure and efficient USDT transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity to upgrade your trading game. Visit https://globalflashco.com/ now to get your hands on the new Flash USDT Transaction software.
    How fake usdt transfer app works | How to send a fake usdt transfer
    It's very simple to send a fake usdt transfer. The only thing needed is a software and that's all, you're good to go. The fake usdt transfer software is built in way that is very friendly and easy to use making easy for anyone to send flash USDT as they please.

    We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version.

    We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE. https://globalflashco.com/

    FEATURES OF OUR FLASH USDT SOFTWARE 
     
     • The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it.
     • The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times.
     • TAnd the third difference is that Flash USD can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days
     • You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days
     • Comes with a lifetime activation key
     • You can send a max of 175,000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    Fake usdt generator | Flash USDT Software | Fake usdt transaction generator Fake usdt generator is a term given to applications that are used to create fake USDT transactions on the blockchain network. Flash usdt generator applications uses sophisticated crypto technology to create fake USDT transactions. There is a limit to how much flash USDT can be generated by these applications on daily basis. Some of the USDT generator applications can send up to $500k in fake USDT tokens as well as some can send just about $100k flash USDT or less per day. Some other applications can't send flash Tether on the blockchain network. https://globalflashco.com/ Looking for the latest release of Flash USDT Transaction software? Check out the full version of our USDT flashing software available at GLOBALFLASHCO. Get ready to experience fast and hassle-free USDT flashing with our powerful and advanced software. With our new version, you can effortlessly perform secure and efficient USDT transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity to upgrade your trading game. Visit https://globalflashco.com/ now to get your hands on the new Flash USDT Transaction software. How fake usdt transfer app works | How to send a fake usdt transfer It's very simple to send a fake usdt transfer. The only thing needed is a software and that's all, you're good to go. The fake usdt transfer software is built in way that is very friendly and easy to use making easy for anyone to send flash USDT as they please. We present you the new version of Flash USDT Transaction software, USDT flashing software Full Version. We are the Best USDT Flashing Service you will find Online WE SELL FLASH COINS AND THE FLASH COIN GENERATOR ON OUR WEBSITE HERE. https://globalflashco.com/ FEATURES OF OUR FLASH USDT SOFTWARE     • The first is that it disappears in any wallet it is found in and any crypto it has been converted to after 90 days from the date you received it.  • The second difference is that Flash USDT cannot be transferred more than 12 times.  • TAnd the third difference is that Flash USD can be converted into any other type of crypto coin in an exchange, but if it is restored, that coin will also disappear after 50 days  • You can set the time delay you want the flash coin to stay from 5min to 90 days  • Comes with a lifetime activation key  • You can send a max of 175,000USDT daily https://globalflashco.com/
    GLOBALFLASHCO.COM
    Flash Bitcoin Software
    Flash BTC Transaction ! are you Looking for a simple way to send fake bitcoins for free? Check out Flash bitcoin transaction software on globalflashco. This bitcoin fork operates on the bitcoin network and allows you to generate bitcoin that can be easily sent to any wallet address. Experience the convenience and efficiency of this Flash bitcoin generator and take control of your transactions. Don't miss out on this opportunity, visitglobalflashco today and explore the possibilities with Flash bitcoins.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 235 Views
  • More Parents in U.K. Refuse Childhood Vaccinations
    mother refuses vaccination for baby
    In late 2023, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that there had been a decline in state required vaccines from 95 percent to 93 percent among kindergarteners during the 2020-2021 school year compared to the 2019-2020 school year.1 2 Now, public health officials in the United Kingdom also are reporting lower uptake of childhood vaccinations in that country.

    Recent data from the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) showed a slight increase in the uptake of some specific childhood vaccines between January 2024 and March 2024. However, health officials say that overall vaccination targets are still not being met. The U.K. follows the World Health Organization’s (WHO) guideline target of 95 percent of under five-year-olds to be vaccinated.3

    U.K.’s 6-in-1 Shot for Children Has Lower Than Expected Uptake

    The National Health Service (NHS) in the U.K. recommends a three dose 6-in-1 combination vaccine for babies given at 8, 12 and 16 weeks old. The 6-in-1 combination vaccine includes vaccines for diphtheria, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), polio, tetanus, and pertussis.4

    The uptake for the 6-in-1 vaccine and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine exceeded the targets in Scotland and Wales. However, vaccination goals for the entire U.K. were not met. For the U.K. as a whole, only 91.5 percent of children under two years old had received the 6-in-1 vaccine, and only 84.5 percent of children under five years old had received the combination vaccine.5

    Vaccine coverage for the first dose of MMR, which is given at age one in the U.K., dropped 0.5 percent to 92.5 percent. Uptake for the second dose of MMR given between three to five years old increased by 0.2 percent but only to 85.2 percent.6

    Vaccination Campaign Launched in U.K. to Boost Uptake

    In March 2024 during a measles outbreak in the U.K., public health officials implemented a vaccination campaign to boost vaccination rates in children, which they stated have steadily decreased over the past decade, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.7

    In a video created by UKHSA streamed on television, radio and online, children tell their parents and caregivers:

    Our generation’s risk of illnesses like measles and whooping cough is rising. If we’re not vaccinated, we’re not protected.8

    Parents in U.K. Question Safety of Childhood Vaccines

    Just like in the U.S.,9 10 many parents in the U.K. were questioning the safety of childhood vaccines prior to the recent measles vaccination campaign. In a Facebook group for parents, a mother asked for advice in November 2023 on the MMR vaccine because she had received a letter from the NHS asking her to take her daughter to get the vaccine. She said she does not know whom to trust. She wrote:

    I’ve done some research but feel like a lot of the info on the web is pro-vaccine. Just trying to learn about it all and make the right decisions. Thank you in advance.11

    The post received hundreds of replies with stories of children that were injured by the MMR vaccine, others providing information on the risks of the vaccine, and other resources from parents. One parent responded:

    No no no. Avoid them all. Once they’re injected into the bloodstream, the metals and toxins have access to the brain and every organ! Arm yourself with information to decline because they will pressure you.”12

    Another parent said:

    I keep getting letters for all my kids. It’s scaremongering. I’ve threatened my surgery with harassment if they don’t stop sending me letters.13

    Dr. Selvaseelan Selvarajah, a general practitioner in the U.K. who is a vaccine proponent said:

    Since COVID we’ve seen a lot more hesitancy. Theories about the MMR and COVID vaccines have merged.14

    If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

    Click here to view References:

    https://thevaccinereaction.org/2024/07/more-parents-in-u-k-refuse-childhood-vaccinations/
    More Parents in U.K. Refuse Childhood Vaccinations mother refuses vaccination for baby In late 2023, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that there had been a decline in state required vaccines from 95 percent to 93 percent among kindergarteners during the 2020-2021 school year compared to the 2019-2020 school year.1 2 Now, public health officials in the United Kingdom also are reporting lower uptake of childhood vaccinations in that country. Recent data from the U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) showed a slight increase in the uptake of some specific childhood vaccines between January 2024 and March 2024. However, health officials say that overall vaccination targets are still not being met. The U.K. follows the World Health Organization’s (WHO) guideline target of 95 percent of under five-year-olds to be vaccinated.3 U.K.’s 6-in-1 Shot for Children Has Lower Than Expected Uptake The National Health Service (NHS) in the U.K. recommends a three dose 6-in-1 combination vaccine for babies given at 8, 12 and 16 weeks old. The 6-in-1 combination vaccine includes vaccines for diphtheria, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), polio, tetanus, and pertussis.4 The uptake for the 6-in-1 vaccine and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine exceeded the targets in Scotland and Wales. However, vaccination goals for the entire U.K. were not met. For the U.K. as a whole, only 91.5 percent of children under two years old had received the 6-in-1 vaccine, and only 84.5 percent of children under five years old had received the combination vaccine.5 Vaccine coverage for the first dose of MMR, which is given at age one in the U.K., dropped 0.5 percent to 92.5 percent. Uptake for the second dose of MMR given between three to five years old increased by 0.2 percent but only to 85.2 percent.6 Vaccination Campaign Launched in U.K. to Boost Uptake In March 2024 during a measles outbreak in the U.K., public health officials implemented a vaccination campaign to boost vaccination rates in children, which they stated have steadily decreased over the past decade, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.7 In a video created by UKHSA streamed on television, radio and online, children tell their parents and caregivers: Our generation’s risk of illnesses like measles and whooping cough is rising. If we’re not vaccinated, we’re not protected.8 Parents in U.K. Question Safety of Childhood Vaccines Just like in the U.S.,9 10 many parents in the U.K. were questioning the safety of childhood vaccines prior to the recent measles vaccination campaign. In a Facebook group for parents, a mother asked for advice in November 2023 on the MMR vaccine because she had received a letter from the NHS asking her to take her daughter to get the vaccine. She said she does not know whom to trust. She wrote: I’ve done some research but feel like a lot of the info on the web is pro-vaccine. Just trying to learn about it all and make the right decisions. Thank you in advance.11 The post received hundreds of replies with stories of children that were injured by the MMR vaccine, others providing information on the risks of the vaccine, and other resources from parents. One parent responded: No no no. Avoid them all. Once they’re injected into the bloodstream, the metals and toxins have access to the brain and every organ! Arm yourself with information to decline because they will pressure you.”12 Another parent said: I keep getting letters for all my kids. It’s scaremongering. I’ve threatened my surgery with harassment if they don’t stop sending me letters.13 Dr. Selvaseelan Selvarajah, a general practitioner in the U.K. who is a vaccine proponent said: Since COVID we’ve seen a lot more hesitancy. Theories about the MMR and COVID vaccines have merged.14 If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here. Click here to view References: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2024/07/more-parents-in-u-k-refuse-childhood-vaccinations/
    THEVACCINEREACTION.ORG
    More Parents in U.K. Refuse Childhood Vaccinations
    In late 2023, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that there had been a decline in state required vaccines from 95 percent to 93 percent among kindergarteners during the 2020-2021 school year compared to the 2019-2020 school year.1 2 Now, public health officials in...
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 714 Views
  • Teenz 2024 Watch Full Movie Online

    https://tinyurl.com/4w85b9mh

    full movies,movies,watch free family movies on youtube,full movies english,teen movie,full movie,free movies,watch online,free movies online,teen movies,f the prom full movie online,teen titans go watch online,watch girl fight free online,free full length movies to watch on youtube,watch lifetime movies,operation neighborhood watch full movie,tamil new movies online,teenz movie public review,neighborhood watch movie,teenz movie review
    #watchfullmovie #watchfullmovieonline #trandingmovie #DhruvRathee #StepDownHasina #TerroristAttack #StudentsUnderAttack #BanBSL
    Teenz 2024 Watch Full Movie Online https://tinyurl.com/4w85b9mh full movies,movies,watch free family movies on youtube,full movies english,teen movie,full movie,free movies,watch online,free movies online,teen movies,f the prom full movie online,teen titans go watch online,watch girl fight free online,free full length movies to watch on youtube,watch lifetime movies,operation neighborhood watch full movie,tamil new movies online,teenz movie public review,neighborhood watch movie,teenz movie review #watchfullmovie #watchfullmovieonline #trandingmovie #DhruvRathee #StepDownHasina #TerroristAttack #StudentsUnderAttack #BanBSL
    0 Comments 0 Shares 234 Views
  • Watch Kill 2024 Full Movie Online

    https://tinyurl.com/yc4xr33p

    kill 2024 movie,hollywood movie 2024,kill 2024 film,kill 2024 teaser trailer,kill 2024 official teaser,full movie,full movie 2024,new movie 2024,full movies 2024,new action movie 2024,hollywood movies in english 2024,full movies,movie,new hollywood movies in english 2024,watch lifetime movies,movies,action movie 2024,movies 2024 full movies,new chinese english dubbed movies 2024,new hollywood movies 2024,hollywood movie english 2024
    Watch Kill 2024 Full Movie Online https://tinyurl.com/yc4xr33p kill 2024 movie,hollywood movie 2024,kill 2024 film,kill 2024 teaser trailer,kill 2024 official teaser,full movie,full movie 2024,new movie 2024,full movies 2024,new action movie 2024,hollywood movies in english 2024,full movies,movie,new hollywood movies in english 2024,watch lifetime movies,movies,action movie 2024,movies 2024 full movies,new chinese english dubbed movies 2024,new hollywood movies 2024,hollywood movie english 2024
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 200 Views
More Results