Enter Your Details to GET a $100 Starbucks Gift Card Now! 👉https://rb.gy/yf7aoa #hamster #viral #HamsterKombat #Tapswap #SEOKJIN #Israel Japan #dc #batman #jason todd #bruce wayne #dick grayson #batfam #tim drake #usa #uk #sw #bd

Enter Your Details to GET a $100 Starbucks Gift Card Now! 👉https://rb.gy/yf7aoa #hamster #viral #HamsterKombat #Tapswap $Blum #Tapswap #NEDijs #notcoin Quran President Marcos Dubai #SEOKJIN #Israel Japan #dc #batman #jason todd #bruce wayne #dick grayson #batfam #tim drake #usa #uk #sw #bd

The U.S. Army Concert Band accompanied Peter Moore from the London Symphony Orchestra for a performance of Lincoln Tunnel Cabaret by Bramwell Tovey at The U.S. Army Band 2024 American Trombone Workshop; COL Bruce Pulver, conducting. #LondonSymphony #LSO #ArmyBand #ConcertBand #Band #ArmyMusic #MilitaryMusic #Trombone #ATW2024 #ATW #Music

The U.S. Army Orchestra accompanied Hillary Simms from the American Brass Quintet for a performance of Romanze for Viola and String Orchestra by Max Bruch at The U.S. Army Band 2024 American Trombone Workshop; COL Bruce Pulver, conducting. #ABQ #MilitaryMusic #ArmyMusic #ArmyOrchestra #Orchestra #Trombone #ATW2024 #ATW #Music

The U.S. Army Concert Band featured tuba soloist Carol Jantsch for a world-premiere performance of Amaia, a concerto for tuba and wind band by Ricardo Mollá, in the Rachel M. Schlesinger Concert Hall at The U.S. Army Band 2024 Tuba-Euphonium Workshop; COL Bruce Pulver, conducting. #PhilOrch #Philadelphia #Yale #Bulldogs #ThisIsYale #WorldPremiere #ArmyBand #ConcertBand #Band #ArmyMusic #MilitaryMusic #Tuba #TEW2024 #TEW #Music

The U.S. Army Orchestra accompanied tubist David Zerkel for a performance of Radiant Dances by James Naigus in the Rachel M. Schlesinger Concert Hall at The U.S. Army Band 2024 Tuba-Euphonium Workshop; COL Bruce Pulver, conducting. #MichiganWolverines #OnePride #AMaizeing #GoBlue #ArmyOrchestra #Orchestra #MilitaryMusic #Tuba #TEW2024 #TEW #Music

TAKE ACTION CANADA NOW IS THE TIME TO TAKE ACTION, to speak out against the negotiations being conducted by the World Health Organization and to sign the Canadian Petition to exit the UN and the WHO. James Roguski Share Leave a comment THE DEADLINE TO SIGN THE CANADIAN PETITION IS FEBRUARY 7, 2024. CLICK HERE FOR COMPLETE DETAILS http://CanadianPetition.com Contact the Canadian Representative to the WHO Executive Board (2022-2025) Ms. Christine Harmston Director General Office of International Affairs for the Health Portfolio Public Health Agency of Canada Ottawa [email protected] 613-286-4684 https://www.goc411.ca/en/114945/Christine-Harmston Please watch the videos below… https://rumble.com/v47zuoo-canadian-petition-to-exit-the-united-nations-and-the-who.html Talk Truth https://rumble.com/v47c9qn-talk-truth-01.18.24-james-roguski.html What's Up Canada with Wayne Peters https://rumble.com/v46j7vc-one-on-one-with-james-roguski-on-sogi-maid-withdrawing-from-united-nations-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2 https://www.bitchute.com/video/bcmG45DZz9Cw/ Rebel News with Tamara Ugolini https://rumble.com/v45v44n-world-health-organization-rewriting-international-health-laws-without-a-vot.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=42 https://www.bitchute.com/video/BWSzwA9t5IE/ https://www.rebelnews.com/world_health_organization_rewriting_international_health_laws_without_a_vote Liberty Talk Canada with Odessa https://rumble.com/v44e9p6-everyone-must-know-what-happens-jan-27th2024-and-share-with-the-world-asap.html Tish Talk with Tish Conlin https://rumble.com/v455sfu-update-on-the-fight-to-exit-the-who-with-james-roguski.html SIGN THE CANADIAN PETITION AND SPREAD THE WORD https://www.CanadaExitWHO.ca CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE CANADIAN PETITION http://CanadianPetition.com Please read the articles below… The Future Does NOT Belong to Globalists The Future Does NOT Belong to Globalists The brave and honourable people of Canada are encouraged to sign this official Parliamentary petition (#4623) to have Canada EXIT the United Nations and EXIT the World Health Organization. Read full story A Discussion With Bruce Pardy A Discussion With Bruce Pardy Bruce Pardy has written some very important articles and I recently had the opportunity to have an in depth conversation with him. This information is EXTREMELY important. Please watch the video below… Read full story Everyone around the world is invited to submit a public comment to the Office of Global Affairs in the United States BEFORE 5PM EASTERN, JANUARY 22, 2024. It's Time To YELL At The U.S. Government It's Time To YELL At The U.S. Government WORLDWIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED “PANDEMIC AGREEMENT” HAVE BEEN REQUESTED BY THE UNITED STATES OFFICE FOR GLOBAL AFFAIRS PLEASE WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW… Read full story Read the article below to learn how the WHO fraudulently claimed that amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted on May 28, 2024 even though there is NO EVIDENCE THAT A VOTE WAS EVER HELD. Follow The Damn Rules Follow The Damn Rules Read full story The Deadline is January 27, 2024 The Deadline is January 27, 2024 SPREAD THE WORD… The Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) has openly admitted that they are going to FAIL to meet their deadline. NO AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED AT THE 77TH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY IN MAY 2024 UNLESS A FINAL VERSION IS SUBMITTED FOUR(4) MONTHS IN ADVANCE (BY JANUARY 27, 2024). Read full story LEARN MORE… Informed-Dissent.com StopTheGlobalAgenda.com ThePeoplesDeclaration.com ExitTheWHO.org ExitTheWHO.com RejectTheAmendments.com StopTheAmendments.com StopTheWHO.com ScrewTheWHO.com PreventGenocide2030.org MaskCharade.com Under Development… DemandHealthFreedom.com DemandHealthFreedom.org HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com James Roguski The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly. If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime. JamesRoguski.com JamesRoguski.substack.com/about JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive 310-619-3055 All content is free to all readers. All support is deeply appreciated. CLICK HERE TO DONATE Share Leave a comment https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/take-action-canada?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

On his X account Mr. Peters put it into simpler language: “Pedophilia is allowed in the Talmud.”  “The passage does not say that he ‘may’,  It is a discussion of culpability –  clear misquote,” the Head of Crown Heights Jewish Community Council, Eli Cohen, told the Sun on Tuesday evening, adding that “this fellow could have led a blood libel in Medieval Europe 200 years ago.” ‘It’s Wild Fantasy and Malevolence’: Fracas Over Tunnel Beneath Brooklyn Synagogue Leads to Torrent of Antisemitic Conspiracy Theories Wednesday, January 10, 202418:01:59 pm The young chasidic men who were defending their tunnel are believed to have been trying to expand the synagogue according to the wishes of the revered Lubavitch Rabbi Menachem Schneerson. Bruce Schaff via AP New York Police officers arrest a Hasidic Jewish student on January 8, 2024 at New York. Bruce Schaff via AP MARIE POHL MARIE POHL Video footage showing Monday’s clash between young chasidic men and the New York Police Department at an iconic synagogue at Crown Heights, Brooklyn, went viral and has now been trending on social media for two days. The chaotic scenes, in which zealous students are seen throwing pews at cops, tearing down wooden panels, and emerging from a tunnel, has opened the floodgates to a rampant stream of invective and antisemitic child trafficking conspiracy theories. https://www.nysun.com/article/its-wild-fantasy-and-malevolence-fracas-over-tunnel-beneath-brooklyn-synagogue-leads-to-torrent-of-antisemitic-conspiracy-theories-involving-bloody-mattresses-and-baby-chai

Wikipedia’s Smear Piece on WCH Represents a Badge of Honour The World Council for Health's message of health sovereignty is clearly a threat to the establishment. World Council for Health Written by World Council for Health Correspondent Alice Ashwell, PhD. They say that you pick up the most flack when you’re right over the target. Since the Covid phenomenon began, the degree of flack has become a navigational aid in the pursuit of Truth. Wikipedia’s hit piece on the World Council for Health (WCH) is evidence that their message of health sovereignty has become a threat to the establishment. Brainwashing goes global Ever more brazenly over the past four years, members of the ‘Great Reset Establishment’ have been involved in a process of what Psychoanalyst Dr Bruce Scott calls ‘menticide’, or brainwashing on a global scale. Through the unethical use of applied psychology, governments, corporations, and organisations around the world have been manipulating the masses into compliance with their globalist agenda. Whether the issue has been Covid-19, the war in Ukraine, economic meltdown, or climate hysteria, the outcome has been an environment of heightened fear and uncertainty. People seeking direction have been subjected to unprecedented levels of propaganda and censorship, which have added to the confusion by creating a ‘through-the-looking-glass’ world in which it feels like truths have become lies, and vice versa. If this content is important to you, please share it with your network. Share Wikipedia - no longer reliable One of the ‘trusted’ sources we have become accustomed to turning to when seeking information on a host of topics is Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. This online encyclopedia was established in 2001 with the aim of being a free, open, and neutral source of information that anyone could access and edit. The idea was that all sides of controversial issues would be welcomed and readers would be left to make up their own minds. But, as Wikipedia co-founder-turned-critic Larry Sanger complained in an interview with Glenn Greenwald in July 2023, “It didn’t work out that way.” Over time, the platform has moved away from its non-negotiable editorial policy that content should strive to reflect a ‘neutral point of view’ (NPOV). As Kristin Heflin described in her PhD thesis in 2010, this means that: … all Wikipedia content must represent―fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. By insisting articles represent [―] all significant views without bias, the policy of striving for NPOV shares similarities with objectivity … (p. 89) In 2015, Heather Ford observed in her D. Phil. Thesis that Wikipedia was by that time offering “a skewed representation of the world that favours some groups at the expense of others” (p. 3). She continued: Instead of everyone having the same power to represent their views on Wikipedia, those who understand how to perform and speak according to Wikipedia's complex technical, symbolic and policy vocabulary tend to prevail over those who possess disciplinary knowledge about the subject being represented. This means that Wikipedia is able to decide which facts are stabilised or destabilised on its platform, according to the ideological positions of its editors. While Wikipedia originally provided the opportunity for people to publish without the need for gatekeepers or mediators, this is no longer the case. Especially since the Covid-19 event boosted the fortunes of the Censorship Industrial Complex, Wikipedians have become foot soldiers in the battle to scrub from the Internet information they consider to be mis-, dis-, or mal-information. Larry Sanger, in the interview mentioned above, described how he has watched Wikipedia’s neutrality evaporate over the years, shifting around 2005 to establishment views on topics like global warming and certain drugs, and starting to show bias against holistic medicine in the early 2010s. Its reliable sources of information are now left-of-centre media corporations such as CNN, MSNBC, and the New York Times, while in their policies 80% of news sources on the right are deemed unreliable. Independent news outlets and self-published subject experts are also not able to edit a Wikipedia page. Before it is deemed acceptable, information needs to be filtered through a mainstream news source, which in turn is constrained by fact-checking services. Misrepresenting Covid dissidents The World Council for Health (WCH) is one of many organisations and individuals who have been defamed by Wikipedia since the advent of Covid-19. As discussed at the WCH’s 83rd General Assembly meeting in April 2023, this has been part of a much broader strategy to silence dissent with regard to the so-called pandemic and its protocols. WCH was established to challenge the official Covid response and its Wikipedia article was created in September 2022. The current Wikipedia entry is fairly close to the original version, although it has been edited a number of times. However, a number of Wikipedia pages created prior to Covid-19 have been completely amended since 2020, resulting in a ‘hero-to-zero’ fall from grace for people such as the author Dr Vernon Coleman (compare his October 2019 entry with the current article), and the early developer of the mRNA vaccine technology, Dr Robert Malone, whose role in this invention has been deleted from the page on mRNA vaccines. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/fact-checkers-independent-media/ Who’s fact-checking the fact-checkers? A trio of independent media creators—Derrick Broze, Jason Bassler & Joe Martino—reveal their eye-opening shared experience in dealing with fact-checkers and censorship dating back years before Covid-19 emerged. Scarcely worth commenting on … but we shall! Let’s take a look at the WCH Wikipedia article (accessed 18 December 2023) to see just how deeply flawed and factually incorrect it is. Firstly, the content – comprising just eight paragraphs – is entirely inadequate. Other than stating that the organisation “appears to have been formed in September 2021” [emphasis mine], and that it was “founded by Jennifer A. Hibberd and Tess Lawrie”, nothing substantive is mentioned about what WCH is or what it does, despite its goals, values, and initiatives being clearly represented on its website and social media channels. Secondly, most of the article attempts to smear WCH by association. The bulk of the content refers to people or organisations who are part of the broader health freedom network but neither WCH staff nor council members, including Robert F Kennedy Jr of Children’s Health Defense and esteemed cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra. Wikipedia maligns these experts for their efforts to cancel the rollout of the experimental Covid-19 gene therapies which, contrary to the protestations of the fact-checkers, have caused millions of deaths worldwide. Ironically, Wikipedia accuses Dr Malhotra of “cherry-picking” sources to substantiate his concerns about the jab, yet they themselves cherry-pick tangential content and questionable opinions from, with only two exceptions, rather dubious sources. So, thirdly, let’s have a look at the references Wikipedia uses to back up its potentially libelous statements. The reference to Kerr et. al (March 2022) is simply a brief Erratum, noting that some of the authors of the paper quoted were using ivermectin to treat patients, which one would expect as they were reporting on its efficacy. The flawed Cochrane Review by Popp et. al (2022) that criticised a systematic review by Bryant et. al (2021) on the use of ivermectin to prevent and treat Covid-19 was thoroughly debunked in a letter sent to them by Fordham and colleagues in September 2021, but this has not been acknowledged on Wikipedia. The Bryant et al review remains in the top 10 most read out of 23 million tracked scientific papers. Three references are to fact-checking sites: AAP FactCheck (Australia), AFP Fact Check (France), and Health Feedback (USA), which employ teams of people to prevent the dissemination of information that is not in line with the menticidal narratives of the Great Reset Establishment. Four of the nine sources come from two Vice magazine journalists, Anna Merlan and Tim Hume. Their articles are replete with worn-out terms such as right-wing, conspiracy theorist, Covid-denier, anti-vaxxer, and mis-/disinformation-peddler. They also predictably take issue with ivermectin, common law, and even the notion of sovereign citizens! The tone of the articles ranges from wryly dismissive to scathingly scornful, with words such as discredited, nonsense, completely false, misleading, and fringe peppering the text. They also delight in reporting cases of doctors and scientists who have been barred from their professions for refusing to deny their professional oaths and personal principles. Underlying the supercilious slurs, however, runs a definite current of concern that these ‘discredited conspiracy theorists’ who are promoting health, freedom, and human rights may actually be gaining traction. Larry Sanger reflects on how far Wikipedia has departed from its original commitment to neutrality by pointing out the features of biased reporting, all of which apply to the Wikipedia article on WCH: negative information is so predominant that readers can infer that the authors harbor great hatred, resentment, or strong disapproval of the subject (especially when the target has a popular following among many ordinary people); dismissive epithets and judgments are used in Wikipedia’s own voice; or what a person is legitimately famous for is omitted, dismissed, or misrepresented While WCH might wish to create a more accurate Wikipedia entry, this is not possible. According to the view source button, only registered users are allowed to edit this article. In other words, WCH has no right of reply. Wikipedia, like a child having a tantrum, refuses point-blank to engage with those people and ideas it just WILL NOT acknowledge. Is there a future for Wikipedia? Why anyone would bother to search Wikipedia for information about WCH, which has a perfectly informative website and Substack, is anyone’s guess. But the more Wikipedia produces atrocious articles like the one on WCH, the faster they will lose credibility among those who simply want information and do not have an ideological axe to grind. In fact, it is worth subjecting this article to a well-known credibility test developed by California State University, and appropriately named the CRAAP test! Its five components (plus comments on the WCH article) include: Currency: Is the source up-to-date? – No, for one thing, it does not mention WCH’s second conference in 2023. Although editing of the Wikipedia article continues, no up-to-date information has been added. Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research? – Not if one wants to know anything about WCH. But it has been very relevant to an investigation into the decline and fall of Wikipedia. Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field? – Absolutely not. Wikipedia’s policy on Reliable Sources specifically discounts independent experts in favour of large news corporations, which are committed to promoting Establishment narratives. Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly? – Not at all. Please visit the WCH website to confirm this. Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source? – The only purpose appears to be to discredit WCH. At least in the case of the WCH article, Wikipedia’s credibility is clearly questionable. More broadly, Wikipedia co-founder, Larry Sanger, believes that the platform can no longer be trusted. Observing that it has become a useful propaganda mouthpiece for the Establishment, he mused: “If only one version of the facts is allowed, then that gives a huge incentive to wealthy and powerful people to seize control of things like Wikipedia in order to shore up their power.” Indeed, in recent years, Google has invested substantially in the Wikipedia Foundation, paying them to provide the “most accurate and up-to-date information” for its search engine. Google is now elevating Wikipedia articles in Internet searches, using their content to populate their ‘knowledge panels’, and inserting their articles under videos on YouTube (its subsidiary) in an effort “to fight misinformation and conspiracy theories.” In this way, the actual spreaders of misinformation flood the Internet with their post-truth propaganda, causing those who value Truth, Beauty, and Goodness to look elsewhere for information. What is particularly interesting, though, is that the Wikipedia edifice may be crumbling from within. Thanks to the transparency of the Wikimedia system, one is able to peer behind the curtain into the online discussions of the various editors working on a particular article. And here we discover dissention in the ranks. Recent discussions between Wikipedia editors working on the WCH article reveal anything but agreement regarding this flimsy hit-piece. For example, one editor asks why the article on WCH focuses on Dr Lawrie. The person then asks why Dr Lawrie’s qualifications, directorship, publication record, and over 4,000 citations are not mentioned (actually Dr Lawrie has over 5,000 citations and is ranked among the top 5% of Researchgate scientists), but only her prior role as an obstetrician. It is encouraging to read the following comment: Science is research and debate, not dogma; even in the case Lawrie could be wrong on some things, that doesnt's [sic.] make her a conspiracy theorist, but a good researcher. Suppression of scientific debate is not scientific method. Later, and for good reason, concerns are expressed about the use of Vice magazine as a ‘reliable source’ (RS). Anna Merlan, author of three of the Vice articles. Conclusion WCH’s Wikipedia experience is the tip of a very large iceberg of censorship and suppression (Shi-Raz et al. 2023) that, especially over the past four years, has been threatening to sink those opposing Establishment narratives. Media and tech companies, including Wikipedia, Google, and the fact-checkers mentioned in this article, have played a central role in stifling debate and attempting to constrain narratives and minds. But, as Larry Sanger puts it, “people have natural BS detectors” and are not satisfied with condescending journalists or one flavour of opinion. Instead, as described by Shi-Raz et al., many people who are concerned about public health and committed to freedom of speech have not been deterred by the efforts of the Establishment. Instead, they have been motivated to create a world in parallel to the mainstream, using alternative channels of communication, establishing multi-disciplinary support networks, and developing alternative medical and health information systems such as, of course, the World Council for Health. And, recognising the decline of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger is in the process of creating what he calls the ‘Encyclosphere’, a massive network of online encyclopaedias covering a plethora of specialist and generalist areas of knowledge, that is set to literally put Wikipedia in its place as an equal among many others. So, while Wikipedia spends an inordinate amount of time, energy, and money on a business that not only lacks substance but is also mean-spirited and divisive, initiatives like WCH and the Encyclosphere shine like candles in the dark, illuminating a better way. Share If you find value in this Substack and have the means, please consider making a contribution to support the World Council for Health. Thank you. Upgrade to Paid Subscription Refer a friend Donate Subscriptions Give Direct to WCH https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/wikipedia-smear-piece-wch?utm_medium=ios

The list of 167 associates of Jeffrey Epstein and visitors to his pedophile island. ▪️Adam Perry Lang ▪️Akon ▪️Al Gore ▪️Alan Dershowitz ▪️Albert Pinto ▪️Alec Baldwin ▪️Allison Mack ▪️Alyssa Rogers ▪️Anderson Cooper ▪️Andrea Mitrovich ▪️Andres Pastrana ▪️Angelina Jolie ▪️Anthony Kiedis ▪️Anthony Weiner ▪️Barack Obama ▪️Ben Affleck ▪️Bernie Sanders ▪️Beyonce ▪️Bill Clinton ▪️Bill Gates ▪️Bob Saget (décédé) ▪️Bruce Willis ▪️Casey Wasserman ▪️Callum Hudson-Odoi ▪️Celine Dion ▪️Charles Barkley ▪️Charlie Sheen ▪️Charlize Theron ▪️Chelsea Handler ▪️Cher ▪️Chris Tucker ▪️Chris Wagner ▪️Chrissy Teigen ▪️Cyndi Lauper ▪️Claire Hazel ▪️Courteney Cox ▪️Courtney Love ▪️Demi Moore ▪️Dan Schneider ▪️David Koch ▪️David Spade ▪️David Yarovesky ▪️Dolores Zorreguieta ▪️Donovan Mitchell ▪️Doug Band ▪️Drew Barrymore ▪️Ed Buck ▪️Ed Tuttle ▪️Ehud Barak ▪️Ellen DeGeneres ▪️Ellen Spencer ▪️Eminem ▪️Emmy Tayler ▪️Fleur Perry Lang ▪️Francis X. Suarez ▪️Freya Wissing ▪️Gary Roxburgh (pilote) ▪️George Clooney ▪️Ghislaine Maxwell ▪️Glenn Dubin ▪️Greg Holbert (décédé) ▪️Gwen Stefani ▪️Gwendolyn Beck ▪️Hank Coller (pilote) ▪️Heather Mann ▪️Heidi Klum ▪️Henry Rosovsky ▪️Hillary Clinton ▪️James Franco ▪️James Gunn ▪️Jay-Z ▪️Jean-Luc Brunel (décédé) ▪️Jean-Michel Gathy ▪️Jeffrey Jones (décédé) ▪️Jim Carrey ▪️Jimmy Kimmel ▪️Joe Biden ▪️Joe Pagano ▪️John Cusack ▪️John Legend ▪️John Podesta ▪️John Travolta ▪️Joy Behar ▪️Juan Pablo Molyneux ▪️Juliette Bryant ▪️Justin Roiland ▪️Justin Trudeau ▪️Kathy Griffin ▪️Katy Perry ▪️Kelly Spam ▪️Kevin Spacey ▪️Kirsten Gillibrand ▪️Kristy Rogers (décédé) ▪️Lady Gaga ▪️Larry Summers ▪️Larry Visoski (pilote) ▪️Laura Z. Wasserman ▪️Lawrence M. Krauss ▪️Linda Pinto ▪️Lisa Summers ▪️Lynn Forester de Rothchild ▪️Madonna ▪️Mandy Ellison (assistant) ▪️Mare Collins-Rector ▪️Marina Abramovic ▪️Mark Epstein ▪️Mark Lloyd ▪️Melinda Luntz ▪️Meryl Streep ▪️Michelle Obama ▪️Michelle Wolf ▪️Mikel Arteta ▪️Miley Cyrus ▪️Nadine Dorries ▪️Naomi Campbell ▪️Naomi Watts ▪️Natalie Blachon de Perrier ▪️Nicole Junkermann ▪️Olga Kurylenko ▪️Oliver Sacks ▪️Oprah ▪️Orlando Bloom ▪️Paris Hilton ▪️Patton Oswatt ▪️Paul Mellon ▪️Paula Epstein (décédé) ▪️Paula Hala ▪️Peter P. Marino ▪️Pharrell Williams ▪️Prince Andrew ▪️Prince Charles ▪️Quentin Tarantino ▪️Rachel Maddow ▪️Rainn Wilson ▪️Ralph Ellison ▪️Ray Barzana (pilote) ▪️Ricardo Legorreta Vilchis ▪️Rihanna ▪️Rita Wilson ▪️Rob Reiner ▪️Robert DeNiro ▪️Robert Downey Jr. ▪️Rodney E. Slater ▪️Ronald Burkle ▪️Rudy Gobert ▪️Sander Burger ▪️Sarah Kellen (assistant) ▪️Sarah Silverman ▪️Seth Green ▪️Shelley Harrison ▪️Shelley Lewis ▪️Sophie Biddle-Hakim ▪️Sophie Trudeau ▪️Stephen Collins ▪️Stephen Colbert ▪️Steven Spielberg ▪️Steven Tyler ▪️Svetlana Glazunova ▪️Teala Davies ▪️Tiffany Gramza ▪️Tom Hanks ▪️Tom Pritzker ▪️Tyler Grasham (décédé) ▪️Victor Salva ▪️Wanda Sykes ▪️Whoopi Goldberg

Bruce Ivins may be dead, but the mystery behind the anthrax letters is not. It was memory-holed; and then in February 2010, the FBI shut down its investigation. But many contend Ivins was railroaded by a flimsy web of lies. Part 7.

TikTok Marketing - 90% COMMISSIONS ECURE ORDER TikTok Marketing Are You Ready To Leverage The TikTok Platform For Profits? It's About Time For You To Learn TikTok Marketing! Promolink 👇 https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ You need to make a good start with TikTok if you want to be successful with it. In March 2019 there had been over 1 billion installs of TikTok. There are over 500 million active users of TikTok and 26.5 million of these are from the United States. Dear Friend, https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ The TikTok social media platform has seen explosive growth over the last two years. It now has 500 million users that are desperate for fun and exciting content and this is a massive opportunity for you to promote your business. To be successful with TikTok marketing you need to know how the platform works and how the users interact with each other. https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ TikTok appeals to a younger demographic and you really need to speak their language to be successful. We have worked hard to provide you with everything that you need to know to use the TikTok platform to market your business successfully. Other marketers have tried marketing on TikTok and failed. We do not want you to make the same mistakes that they did. Here's where my advice for you comes in. TikTok Marketing With My Advice You will learn how to use the TikTok platform to market your business successfully. You will learn that a number of businesses and organizations have already leveraged the TikTok platform to get the word out. You will be able to engage with your audience on TikTok. You will learn how to create viral videos and grow your TikTok account. You will know how the platform works and how the users interact with each other. To make it easy, I've put together a step-by-step guide that will show you exactly how it's done... INTRODUCING TikTok Marketing TikTok Marketing Ebook How To Leverage The TikTok Platform For Profits No stones are left unturned when you get your hands on this now. You will become a complete expert on this, and you'll get everything you need inside to do the same Here's Just A Quick Preview Of What You'll Discover Inside... What Is TikTok And Why Should You Care?? Getting Started With TikTok Creating Content For TikTok TikTok Hashtags Marketing Strategies for TikTok TikTok Ads TikTok Use Cases To Inspire You TikTok Analytics TikTok Best Practices Plus, a whole lot more... https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ This is the easiest way to teach your brain to TikTok Marketing! Who Needs This Step-By-Step Guide? IF YOU ANSWER YES TO ANY OF THE BELOW, YOU NEED THIS Thinking You want to learn how to use the TikTok platform to market your business successfully. You want to learn how create creative videos that get the users involved in their brand in a fun way. You want to know how the platform works and how the users interact with each other. You want to generate more engagement to your audience on TikTok. You want to create successful marketing campaigns. Does This Sound Like Exactly What You Need? But maybe your question is: How Much? If you were going to hire an expert on this, to show you how it's done, you could easily find yourself investing hundreds of dollars for this sort of coaching. In fact, many people invest hundreds and thousands of dollars to get into coaching programs or attend workshops... But, you won't have to invest anywhere near that today. https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ Today, you can get INSTANT ACCESS for just... $14.95 TikTok Marketing Guide is in PDF format . You can download it immediately after the payment. And it just keeps getting better When You Make The Wise Decision To Grab This Today, You'll Also Get These Bonuses Fast Action Bonus #1 TikTok Marketing - Cheat Sheet $27VALUE Cheatsheet This cheat sheet is a handy checklist that makes it easy to get started. It breaks up the entire guide into easy-to-follow steps so that you can make sure you have all the highlights of everything covered inside right at your fingertips. Fast Action Bonus #2 TikTok Marketing - Mind Map $17VALUE mindmap Some people learn better by looking at a mind map. The mind map gives you an overview of everything covered inside the guide. You can also print it out for quick reference anytime you need it! Fast Action Bonus #3 TikTok Marketing - Resource Guide $17VALUE Resources The Resource Guide gives you a quick point of reference to all of the resources mentioned throughout the guide. This makes it easy to plug-in and stick with what you're looking for. Special Bonus #1 Facebook For Business $27VALUE Resources Become A Hotshot Businessman By Advertising On Facebook! Establish yourself as a brand name and enhance your image by adding more and more fans. Special Bonus #2 Google Ads Mastery $27VALUE Resources Here we are with our Awesome Google Ads Mastery course which will show you. * How to get started with Google Ads and Paid search advertising. * What are the latest tips and strategies for mastering Google Ad Campains. * How to audit and optimize Google Ad Campaigns. * How to improve quality Score in Google Adwords and tips to increase Adwords ROI. * Google Ads: Do’s and Don’ts. * How to measure and track Google Ads ROI. * How to design Content Remarketing strategies with Google Display network. * Best Adwords Bidding Strategies. * Using Google Adwords for small businesses. * How to reduce wasted Adwords Spend. * What are the latest features of Google Ads. * And much more.. Special Bonus #3 Instagram Marketing $27VALUE Resources Instagram Marketing is the hidden key to drive tons of targeted traffic to your business & boost sales Chapter 1: What Is Instagram Marketing All About? Chapter 2: Optimizing Your Instagram Profile For Doing Business Chapter 3: Researching The Best Hashtags And Topics For Your Instagram Campaigns Chapter 4: Creating A Basic Instagram Marketing Post Or Product Teaser Chapter 5: Promoting An Instagram Post From The App Chapter 6: Using Instagram Stories To Raise Product Awareness Chapter 7: Repurposing Your Instagram Content For Other Platforms Chapter 8: Using Instagram Live For A Product Reveal Chapter 9: Promoting A Facebook PostOn Your Instagram Account Chapter 10: Running A Facebook Video Ad On Your Instagram Profile Chapter 11: Running A Product Catalog Ad On Instagram Chapter 12: Instagram Marketing Tips For Brands And Businesses Chapter 13: Creating The Type Of Instagram Content That Customers Love Chapter 14: Tips For Capturing And Editing The Perfect Instagram Photo Chapter 15: Using And Understanding Instagram Insights To Track Your Performance Chapter 16: Proven Instagram Marketing Strategies To Try Chapter 17: Instagram Marketing Do’s And Don’ts Chapter 18: Instagram Marketing Premium Tools And Services To Consider Chapter 19: Instagram Marketing Success Stories Chapter 20: Instagram Marketing Frequently Asked Questions https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ Special Bonus #4 LinkedIn Marketing $27VALUE Resources This step-by-step training guide will take you by the hand and help you to enhance your LinkedIn marketing campaigns & boost brand awareness. Chapter 1: What is LinkedIn Marketing all about? Chapter 2: Setting Up a LinkedIn Profile That’s Optimized For Business Chapter 3: Creating an Engaging Company Page Chapter 4: Using “Content Suggestions” To Find Trending LinkedIn Topics Chapter 5: Creating Effective LinkedIn Marketing Posts Chapter 6: Sponsoring LinkedIn Marketing Posts the Right Way Chapter 7: Creating and Growing a LinkedIn Group for Prospects Chapter 8: Using “Search” To Find and Connect with Leads Chapter 9: Creating A LinkedIn Traffic Ad Chapter 10: Creating A LinkedIn Video Ad Chapter 11: Creating A LinkedIn Messaging Ad Chapter 12: The Perfect Step-By-Step LinkedIn Marketing Plan For 2020 Chapter 13: Simple LinkedIn Marketing Hacks to Grow Your B2B Audience Chapter 14: Tips for Creating Awesome LinkedIn Native Content In 2020 Chapter 15: How to Make the LinkedIn Algorithm Work for You In 2020 Chapter 16: Powerful InMail Strategies That Work In 2020 Chapter 17: LinkedIn Marketing Do’s and Don’ts Chapter 18: LinkedIn Marketing Premium Tools and Services to Consider Chapter 19: LinkedIn Marketing Success Stories Chapter 20: LinkedIn Marketing Frequently Asked Questions Special Bonus #5 Quora Marketing $27VALUE Resources This step-by-step training guide will take you by the hand and teach you how to create high converting Quora marketing campaigns to boost leads, sales and profits. Chapter 1: What is Quora all about? Chapter 2: Setting Up Quora For Marketing? Chapter 3: Using Quora Features To Market Your Business Chapter 4: Posting Your Marketing Videos on Quora Chapter 5: Using Quora To Engage Your Audience Chapter 6: Repurposing Your Blog’s Content For Quora Chapter 7: Creating Backlinks On Quora Chapter 8: Setting up a Quora Ad campaign Chapter 9: Setting Up A Traffic Campaign On Quora Chapter 10: Setting Up A Remarketing Campaign On Quora Chapter 11: Cross-Promoting Your Quora Content On Social Chapter 12: Reviewing Your Performance On Quora Chapter 13: Growing Your Business Through The Quora Flywheel Chapter 14: Formatting Your Quora Answers The Right Way Chapter 15: Crazy-Simple Quora Strategies To Boost Your Brand Chapter 16: Tips That Will Help You Create Thought-Provoking Quora Answers Chapter 17: Quora Marketing Do’s And Don’ts Chapter 18: Quora Marketing Premium Tools And Services To Consider Chapter 19: Quora Marketing Success Stories Chapter 20: Quora Marketing Frequently Asked Questions Special Bonus #6 YouTube Business Made Easy $27VALUE Resources This step-by-step training guide will take you by the hand and help you to enhance your YouTube marketing campaigns & boost brand awareness. Chapter 1: What Is YouTube All About? Chapter 2: Researching And Picking A Profitable Niche Chapter 3: Creating And Optimizing A Business YouTube Channel Chapter 4: Setting Up A Sales-Oriented YouTube Vide Chapter 5: Embedding Your YouTube Sales Video On A Blog Post Chapter 6: Cross-Posting Your Sales Video To Your Business’ Social Channels Chapter 7: Starting A Live Stream To Promote A Product Launch URL Chapter 8: How To Send Your Product Video To The First Page Of Search Results Chapter 9: Promoting Your Sales Video With A Custom YouTube Ad Campaign Chapter 10: Creating A Product Consideration Video Ad For YouTube Chapter 11: Creating A Customer Retargeting Campaign On YouTube Chapter 12: Outlining Your Perfect YouTube Sales Funnel For 2020 Chapter 13: Enabling Monetization On YouTube Easily In 2020 Chapter 14: Top YouTube Marketing Tips To Increase Sales in 2020 Chapter 15: The More Profitable Types Of YouTube Videos In 2020 Chapter 16: Alternative Monetization Strategies For Businesses On YouTube Chapter 17: YouTube Business Do’s And Don’ts Chapter 18: YouTube Business Premium Tools And Services To Consider Chapter 19: YouTube Business Success Stories Chapter 20: YouTube Business Frequently Asked Questions Try This Guide On MY DIME There's No Risk! https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ Money Back guarantee There are a lot of people that claim to offer a solution on how to profit from TikTok, so it's understandable if you're a little skeptical. I can keep telling you just how great my guide is, but you really need to go through it and see for yourself what it's all about to know if it's for you That's why I'm going to give you a FULL 60 days to decide if this is for you If for any reason, or no reason at all, you're not 100% satisfied with what's inside, simply send me an email, and and I'll refund every penny of your tiny investment No questions asked! Click The Button Below Now To Get INSTANT ACCESS $14.95 https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/ TikTok Marketing Guide is in PDF format . You can download it immediately after the payment. Thank you so much for taking the time to take a look at this extremely limited offer that has the potential to help you profit from TikTok! I'll see you on the inside! Bruce Johnson PS I've compiled some of the most frequently asked questions about the guide that will show you how to plan for success! Frequently Asked Questions Q&A What's this all about? This is a guide that will show you how to leverage The TikTok Platform for Profits! Q&A Who is this for? If you answer YES to any of the below, you need this You want to learn how to use the TikTok platform to market your business successfully. You want to learn how create creative videos that get the users involved in their brand in a fun way. You want to know how the platform works and how the users interact with each other. You want to generate more engagement to your audience on TikTok. You want to create successful marketing campaigns. Q&A How long until I see results? You can begin seeing results extremely quickly. Within days and sometimes even within hours of getting started. The more you make this a part of your daily life, the better the results you'll get. Q&A How do I get INSTANT ACCESS? Click the button below now Q&A Do I need to buy anything other than this guide? That's the great thing about this. All you need to learn about profiting from TikTok, is in this step-by-step guide. Q&A How is this guide delivered? You'll get instant access to a PDF version of this guide along with download links for the rest of the bonuses. There's no waiting. You can get started RIGHT NOW. Q&A How much? If you were going to hire an expert on this, to show you how it's done, you could easily find yourself investing hundreds of dollars for this sort of coaching. But, you won't have to invest anywhere near that today. Q&A Is there a guarantee? You bet. You get a full 60 days to make sure this is for you. If for any reason, or no reason at all, you're not 100% satisfied, simply send me an email, and I'll refund every penny of your tiny investment No questions asked! $14.95 Buy Button TikTok Marketing Guide is in PDF format . You can download it immediately after the payment. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Terms and Conditions | Support These earnings are not representative for the average participants. The average participant will earn significantly less or no money at all through this product or service. 2023 © . (United States) Inc. and/or its licensors. Review legal terms of use here and privacy policy here. Contact us here. https://www.digistore24.com/redir/482390/Abrar769/

Why So Many Countries Followed China’s Lockdown Example Ron Brown A novel coronavirus that was 10 times deadlier than the flu had gripped the world in 2019. Without a compass to navigate the Covid-19 pandemic, all lessons learned from previous viral pandemics were thrown out the window. The World Health Organization was adamant, “This is not the flu.” Tony Fauci terrified the US House of Representatives with forecasts of disaster. Global populations were defenseless without a vaccine for the novel coronavirus that no one had ever seen before. The only viable defense at the time was to shut down the world. China took the lead in lockdowns. Media exported from China showed people dropping dead in the streets. Caskets were piling up. Doors to buildings were sealed to lock in tenants. Throughout the panic, all reasonable alternative assessments of risks from the viral outbreak were ignored, censored, or rejected. Nevertheless, I wondered whether a video of a person falling down in the street was really representative of the entire population. Were caskets piling up largely due to families fearing to claim them because of contamination with the virus? I noticed that the front doors to my local mall in Ontario, Canada had also been sealed, just like in China apartment buildings, but this was only to control access through a single entrance to the building, not to seal in customers. My first clue that the emergency response to the outbreak of the coronavirus didn’t seem to make sense was when I heard Fauci tell television audiences that if our response seems to be overreacting, then we are probably doing the right thing. What? Since when is overreacting ever the right thing to do? Do generals win wars by overreacting? I looked at the numbers that Fauci had presented to the US House of Representatives concerning case and infection fatalities of the coronavirus. They were backwards! His 10-times deadlier prediction was simply a made-up number! This was in March 2020. By May 2020 it was obvious that people were NOT dying at the inflated rate Fauci had predicted. I published a paper on Fauci’s coronavirus mortality overestimations: Public Health Lessons Learned From Biases in Coronavirus Mortality Overestimation. But when I mentioned all this to my friends, they responded that the lower than predicted deaths just proved the lockdowns were working. Fauci was off the hook. Back to China. WHO/China Joint Mission on Covid-19 The answer to why countries followed China’s lockdowns is simple. They were told to do so by the World Health Organization (WHO). Why did the WHO tell them to do that? You might want to ask Dr. Bruce Aylward, the Director of the WHO/China Joint Mission on Covid-19 investigating the coronavirus outbreak. Aylward noticed a precipitous drop in novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) in China during February 2020. This was before China adopted WHO’s name of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Upon seeing China’s surveillance data, Aylward announced the spectacular findings to the world and told the world to do what China has done and lock down. But he appeared to make a fundamental epidemiological error by wrongly assuming that the association of China’s lockdowns with lower deaths proved the lockdowns were working (just like my friends had told me). Soon after in March 2020, China published its latest case definitions for NCP (Covid-19). In a nutshell, the definitions showed that no one could be declared to have died of the disease unless they had viral pneumonia (a severe acute respiratory illness), and only if no other virus normally associated with viral pneumonia was present, except SARS-CoV-2. Coinfections with the coronavirus were not acceptable criteria, and what should have been a broad surveillance case definition with high sensitivity to monitor the spread of the virus within the population narrowed down considerably into an overly specific diagnostic case definition. That pretty much sealed the deal to declare Covid-19 deaths in only single digits for many months during the pandemic throughout China. This super-low outcome impressed Dr. Bruce Aylward enough in February 2020 to implore the world to lock down. Did we ever! In the meantime, other countries used case and death definitions that went to the opposite extreme of China’s narrow diagnostic definitions, disseminating overinflated surveillance numbers without adjusting the numbers to remove bias. Even Fauci eventually admitted that reported cases and deaths counted WITH the coronavirus are much higher than cases and deaths counted FROM the coronavirus. Ironically, the WHO had previously published material on the correct use and interpretation of surveillance and diagnostic definitions in infectious disease outbreaks. Aylward didn’t appear to get the memo. There is more to the story. Was this even really a novel coronavirus, or just a novel genetic sequence of the coronavirus showing greater detail than previously available? China supposedly received updated genetic sequencing technology in late 2019. They had abandoned surveillance of SARS in 2003 for lack of technology. Now they were back in business again by the end of 2019. The team of virologists that reported the genetic sequence of the virus in Wuhan noted that it would be necessary to investigate the epidemiological evidence to guide infection control responses. Who has time for that? Shut it down! If the novel coronavirus isn’t really so novel, this would explain why the lockdowns didn’t work. We had already known that lockdowns don’t work in other viral pandemics. Even China eventually gave up its Zero Covid Policy after it was obvious that lockdowns weren’t working. My friends owe me some explanations to justify their lockdown views. Maybe Fauci isn’t off the hook after all. For more information on biases in Covid-19 case and death definitions, see my peer-reviewed article with cited references: Biases in COVID-19 Case and Death Definitions: Potential Causes and Consequences. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author. Your financial backing of Brownstone Institute goes to support writers, lawyers, scientists, economists, and other people of courage who have been professionally purged and displaced during the upheaval of our times. You can help get the truth out through their ongoing work. https://brownstone.org/articles/why-so-many-countries-followed-chinas-lockdown-example/

Pentagon Won’t Say Where It’s Sending U.S. Troops — to Avoid Embarrassing Host Nations Ken KlippensteinNovember 16 2023, 5:00 a.m. U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles assigned to the 494th Fighter Squadron take off from RAF Lakenheath, England, for a deployment to an undisclosed location in Southwest Asia, Oct. 16, 2023. While deployed, the 494th FS will support 9th Air Force (Air Forces Central) and be an engaged, postured and ready partner, supporting coalition forces to assure, deter and defend in an increasingly complex and dynamic security environment. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Olivia Gibson) The U.S. military has deployed thousands of troops to the Middle East since Hamas’s surprise October 7 attack on Israel but refuses to disclose the military bases or even host nations of the deployments — not for security reasons, but to spare the host nations embarrassment. One such base, the Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, welcomed several new F-15 attack jets last month, the same aircraft used to bomb facilities used by Iranian-backed militias in Syria at least twice since October, following attacks on U.S. troops by groups supported by Iran. “A confluence of factors are driving the U.S. and Iran towards a direct military conflict, including the buildup of forces.” Despite the hostilities, the Pentagon has declined to acknowledge the base or the military buildup taking place on it for political reasons, even as the growing U.S. presence and increasing activities contribute to rising tensions with Iran. “A confluence of factors are driving the U.S. and Iran towards a direct military conflict, including the buildup of forces, the retaliatory actions in Syria by U.S. forces, and Iranian proxies’ provocations,” Bruce Riedel, nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, told The Intercept. “It is a dangerous situation.” Government records reviewed by The Intercept, along with open-source data, reveal that Muwaffaq Salti continues to act as a low-key U.S. military base central to growing tensions with Iran. “The main hub for U.S. air operations in Syria is now Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, but the American presence is unacknowledged because of host country sensitivities,” said Aaron Stein in a 2021 report by the Foreign Policy Research Institute. Named after Jordanian Lt. Muwaffaq Salti, a pilot who died fighting the Israeli air force during a conflict involving the West Bank in 1966, it isn’t hard to see why the U.S. government doesn’t want its presence on the air base public. Jordan, a nation home to over 2 million Palestinian refugees, is being rocked by protests opposing Israel’s military operation in Gaza. “Tit-for-Tat Exchanges” As the U.S. spirals toward a potential regional war with Iran that could dwarf the casualties in Israel’s war on Gaza, the American government has withheld from the public knowledge of where U.S. troops are in harm’s way. At the time of this writing, there have been 55 attacks on U.S. service members in Iraq and Syria since October 17, according to the Pentagon, resulting in 59 injuries, including traumatic brain injuries. Most Read Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin in a press conference Monday emphasized how unclear the endgame of the attacks is to the U.S. military. “It’s been tit-for-tat exchanges and hard to predict, you know, what will happen going forward,” Austin said. Related Secret U.S. Military Presence in Yemen Adds a Twist to Houthi Attack on Israel Experts say the U.S. deployments may not only fail to deter Iranian attacks, they might also invite them. “Enlargement of the U.S. military presence in the Middle East increases the risk of armed conflict with Iran because it means more potential points of hostile contact between U.S. troops and armed elements allied with Iran,” Paul Pillar, a nonresident fellow at the Quincy Institute, told The Intercept. “As has been the case with U.S. military components in Iraq and Syria, such a presence serves less as a deterrent than as a convenient target for anyone in the area who wants to strike at the United States.” “Undisclosed Location” “Yeah, undisclosed location in the Middle East,” Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder told a reporter asking about the location of U.S. troops being deployed to the region during an October press briefing. “But nice try,” Ryder taunted. The exchange is representative of the Pentagon’s response to questions from the press about the U.S. military buildup. (The Pentagon did not respond to multiple requests for comment from The Intercept.) “Can we say in some Arab countries or Gulf?” another reporter asked about the deployments. “Yeah, I can’t go into specific locations,” Ryder replied. Elias Yousif, a research analyst with the Stimson Center’s Conventional Defense Program, said, “Washington is trying to provide some plausible deniability to host countries at a time when association with the United States is coming to be seen as a political liability.” Despite the secrecy, photographs released by the Defense Department showing F-15s landing at what it described as an “undisclosed location” were quickly geolocated by open-source researchers and shown to be Muwaffaq Salti Air Base. “Washington is trying to provide some plausible deniability to host countries at a time when association with the United States is coming to be seen as a political liability.” Secrecy runs rampant in U.S. efforts linked to the Israeli war against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Little is known about the quantity and nature of the weapons the U.S. military has provided to Israel, despite the Pentagon’s willingness to disclose an itemized list of military support for Ukraine, as The Intercept previously reported. Clues about Muwaffaq Salti are scattered throughout federal records, including a reference to the base in the annex of a controversial defense cooperation agreement signed by the U.S. and Jordan in 2021. The agreement, which authorizes how the U.S. military is able to operate within the country, was enacted by royal decree, bypassing Jordan’s parliament. Even before Israel’s war on Gaza, the U.S. presence in Muwaffaq Salti was expanding. In December 2021, the Pentagon launched a major upgrade to the air base in order to, as Janes Defence Weekly put it, “turn it into a more permanent base.” https://theintercept.com/2023/11/16/pentagon-jordan-military-air-base/

George Webb’s recently re-released book on Substack leads to a sizzling and now-scrubbed article in WIRED about Bruce E. Ivins. Articles like Noah Shachtman’s played a role in resting the anthrax case to bed and pinning the tail on Ivins.