RT - Black hole ‘bigger than the majority of galaxies in the universe’ discovered:

https://www.rt.com/news/573823-science-ultramassive-black-hole-discovered/

#UltramassiveBlackHole #UMBH #BlackHole #GravitationalLensing #Gravity #Astrophysics #Physics

The GreyWarden deconstructs a Marxist Black Hand's dissertation. Enjoy reading our discussion and tell me who you think has the stronger arguments.

@Iblegend > I respectfully disagree with the argument presented. The definition of socialism varies depending on the particular ideology or political movement, and it is not accurate to claim that one specific interpretation is the only valid one. Furthermore, the argument seems to conflate different concepts and historical examples in a way that is not accurate or supported by evidence

Greywarden > And i thank you for actually debating the subject with me rather than running away. And no, definitions do not vary, they are clear cut. Socialism is the collective control or ownership of the means of production or state control of the economy. And you haven't proven how the arguments conflate different concepts that are unsupported by evidence. There is a plethora of evidence for the murder of the Kulax and for what were the intentions of the Marxist Socialists. But whatever.

@Iblegend > Firstly, the argument seems to suggest that collective control of the means of production can only be achieved by a specific group, such as a race, gender, or class collective. However, this is not necessarily the case. Socialism is based on the idea that the means of production should be owned and controlled collectively by society as a whole, rather than by private individuals or corporations. This can be achieved through a variety of means, such as worker cooperatives, state ownership, or community ownership

Greywarden > I never excluded society. You are creating a Strawman. Public Control, State Control, National Control, Group Control, Race Control, Worker Control or ownership of any of these are different forms of Socialism. I never claimed they are all the same. But for you to suggest that some how they are Capitalism because some forms of socialism are different is precisely where your error is, and you can't find a solution to this problem. I see you returned to the Corporation Fallacy again. Corporations are not Private, they are Publicly held and traded. Private cannot be Public Simultaneously and are two completely different things. Private individuals are you, i and Jose. If a collective owns or controls our economy than we as individuals are slaves of the State. Capitalism is none State. How do you address this problem?

@Iblegend > Secondly, the argument suggests that corporations are public sector entities and are a form of state-controlled syndicates. While it is true that some corporations are partially or wholly owned by the state, the majority of corporations are privately owned and operated for the benefit of their shareholders.

Greywarden > The above presents a major problem for you. You just said they are operated for the benefit of their shareholders? If Corporations are traded in the Stock Exchange than they aren't Private. They are owned by Society which is the Public. You make it seem as if Public Ownership is the samething as Private Ownership. No, Corporations aren't Privately owned. They are owned by a collective which is Society not indviduals. Even the "Private Corporations" are not Privately owned. If you look into the Koch Brothers Corporations you will see that a collective owns them. David Koch only had 42% ownership of Koch brothers industry before he died. There are a plethora of Coprations bundled together with the Koch brothers Industries. By definition they aren't really private, even if the Central State weren't to control them as they are controlled by their own collective who are deeply involved in Politics and swaying elections through dark money.

@Iblegend > Corporations operate within a market economy, where the means of production are owned by private individuals or corporations, not by society as a whole. This is fundamentally different from the socialist ideal of collective ownership and control of the means of production

Greywarden > No no no, that is rubbish. The Private Individual does not own the means of production of the Market Economy. The market is state controlled which gives the state defacto ownership of the means of production, not the private individual as you assert.

Greywarden > The majority of Corporation are in the Stock Exchange which are Publicly Traded and State Controlled which in turn is Socialism not Capitalism. The Public owns Corporations. The Public Sector cannot simultaneously be the Private Sector. Furthermore, to conclude that Socialism is none Market is erroneous. Marxism may be non market. But in no way does Marxism define Socialism accurately other than being another form of Socialism. If a Market is controlled by the State, then it isn't a free market and thus not a Capitalist Market. You do not accurately understand the definition of Socialism. Just because a Market exists does not automatically mean it is a Capitalist Market.

Greywarden > Moreover, where there are Black Markets, that only means there is Socialism. Black Markets cannot exist in Capitalist Economies where everyone is fending for themselves. The U.S has a black market which proves it is a Socialist Economy. The Black Markets are the Capitalists lol.

Greywarden > But if you still believe the individual has private ownership in the U.S. Why don't you put this to the test. Buy a home with Cash without depending on banks. Then try never agreeing to pay your property taxes. Comeback to me and tell me if you are able to keep your home. You are not a private owner of what you are led to believe is your own property. Even Cuba is more Capitalist when it comes to property. Any property that are Purchased in Cuba are yours and you aren't tax for it. The property actually belongs to you the individual..

@Iblegend > Thirdly, the argument makes an inaccurate and unfair comparison between socialism and fascism. Fascism is a far-right ideology that is based on authoritarianism, nationalism, and the suppression of individual rights and freedoms.

Greywarden > You haven't proven that Fascism is a Far Right Ideology. Doesn't seem like you have read the works of Mussolini as i have been doing. Mussolini had State Control of the Means of Production during his Reign. Mussolini said like this in his speech in Milan and you can look it up if you'd like, "Everything in the State, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." If you study Mussolini closely, which i am sure you haven't. You will see that Mussolini Socialized the people through their Italian Nationality. His Socialism was based on the Italian Nationality as he tried to bring all Italians together under the State. There is no possible way Mussolini was a Capitalist. Mussolini and even the inventor of Fascism Gentile were opponents of Capitalism. They hated Capitalism! Moreover, Nationalism and Socialism are one and the same. To Nationalise a business is the same as Socialising a Business. To Nationalise the people is the same as Socialisng the people. What exactly is the difference between Nationalizing the Economy or Socializing the Economy? What is the difference between Nationalization of the Private Sector or Socialization of the Private Sector? You tell me..

@Iblegend > It is not accurate to claim that fascism is a form of socialism, or that Mussolini was a socialist. Mussolini and the fascist regime in Italy were fiercely anti-socialist and anti-communist, and actively suppressed socialist and labor movements.

Greywarden > Actually they weren't Anti-Socialist lol. Mussolini tried to end the Class Crisis Marxism had caused by offering people another version of Socialism Gentile called Fascism. Mussolini was the man that put Gentile's ideas into practice. Mussolini offered Fascism as a third way between Marxism and Capitalism. Even if you are able to prove that Mussolini hated Marxism because he was kicked out of the Marxist anti war party of Italy for being a warmonger. You still can't prove that by default that makes him a Capitalist as he also hated Capitalism. You see, your ideas blind you from the facts that Mussolini hated Capitalism as well, and thus couldn't be a Capitalist just because he was not a Marxist.

@Iblegend > Finally, the argument suggests that individualism and collectivism are polar opposites, and that socialism necessarily entails state control of the economy and the suppression of individual freedom. However, this is a simplistic and inaccurate view of both individualism and collectivism. In reality, most political and economic systems contain elements of both individualism and collectivism, and the relationship between the two is complex and multifaceted. It is possible to have a socialist system that allows for individual autonomy and freedom, while still maintaining collective control over the means of production.

Greywarden > There is no argument that says that Collectivism and Individualism are Polar Opposites. Collectivism and Individualism by definition are Polar Opposites and that is a fact. The only reason why some socialist economies allow for some individual freedoms is because they haven't implemented full socialism. Individual ownership and control of your own economy is Capitalism not Socialism. You haven't proven how individualism can be one and the same as collectivism. You are dancing around the points I've made by trying to prove that Individualism can mean two things at once which isn't possible. And mocking arguments you can't refute by calling them simplistic does not make your case that Individualism can mean the same thing as Collectivism stronger. It actually exposes a huge contradiction with your line of reasoning that you can't resolve.

@Iblegend > In conclusion, the argument presented contains several inaccuracies and conflations of different concepts and historical examples. It is important to approach these complex issues with nuance and accuracy, rather than resorting to simplistic and inaccurate comparisons and generalizations.

Greywarden > Again you accuse me of being simplistic because i am taking definitions of terms at face value and not trying to explain away how Private can mean Public at the same time and how an individual can mean a collective at the same time. If you weren't blinded by the doctrines of Marxists you would be able to see how illogical your position is. You are not going to win a debate through illogic

Greywarden > Oh wow. Desantis is the man! I have my Concealed Weapons License and my G-License. Soon ill also be able to open carry if i want to thanks to Desantis.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/florida-lawmakers-send-ron-desantis-bill-make-us-constitutional-carry-majority

Troubling new research finds the majority of foods purchased by Americans contain any number of artificial additives such as preservatives, sweeteners, and coloring or flavoring agents.

Greywarden > Second part of my previous post as SoMee did not permit me to post the entire thing because of its 5,000 Character Max Rule which should not exist.

21. A British report titled Russian #1. A collection of reports of Bolshevism in Russia, claimed that the Bolsheviks were mostly Jewish. There is a big problem with the reports however as explained by the narrator, which is that many of them weren't even eyewitnesses. According to one report, Siberian peasants made remarks stating that most Bolsheviks were Jews although they had never even seen or met a Jew in their entire lives because of the distance between Siberia and the Pale Settlements which the Jews inhabited. Hence, these were false reports.

22. The Rulers of Russia by Reverend Denis Fahey is another false book with many distortions and false accounts. The list in Mr. Fahey's book of Jews in power has no dates associated with it. It does seem like the list matches however Lenin's 1918 cabinet although there were missing cabinet members. No specific cabinet dates, the cabinet list he puts makes no sense. Also, many of the ministerial positions on the list weren't even in existence which is proof of his distortions. 

23. Fahey's distorted book has Lenin's Cabinet consisting of 17/22 people of Jewish origin which is 77%. There are only two people of Jewish origin in the actual list. It was actually 2/15 which is 13.3% without counting some of the missing ones which would make it no more than 4/15 if we were to say those missing ones were actually Jewish. The majority in Lenin's cabinet were of none Jewish descent. As far Stalin, he was even worse. Stalin didn't have any Jewish people in his Cabinet. Stalin Hated Jews and even prohibited his daughter Svetlana from marrying a Jew..

https://youtu.be/1z3F0bEebPw

Greywarden > So, here are the very important points i got from this video on the accusations of Jews being responsible for the Bolshevik Revolution.

1. Lets start with Alexander the 1st of Russia who decreed a Geographic area for Jewish Habitation called the pale settlement in 1804. Tsar Nicholas the 1st further recalibrated such boundaries by 1835 putting further limitation on the Jewish people even within the Pale Settlements.

2. So, as we can see. Jews were an oppressed Class in Russia from the years 1804 to 1835. Jewish youth suffered discriminatory military conscription laws at a disproportionately higher rate than other racial groups.

3. Tsar Alexander the 2nd reversed the conscription laws in the 1850's . However, local systemic persecution of the Jewish people continued under the progroms.

4. After Alexander the 2nd's assasination in 1881, Alexander the 3rd who succeded him reversed laws by enacting the May laws in 1882. These May Laws further restricted Jews to living in the Pale Settlements and did not allow Jews to live outside of larger cities and towns, to own or manage real estate, and it also prohibited them from leasing land and operating their businesses on Sunday or other Christian Holidays.

5. No Jewish properties in rural areas even within the pale.

6. Educational restrictions year (1887)

7. From the 1880's Jews were classified as Aliens.

8. Jews were barred from practicing law and medicine.

9. Jews were barred from voting in zemstvo and municipal elections.

10. With Nicholas the 2nd as the New Tsar from 1868 to 1918. More restrictions on freedoms were added, such as the city government counter reform of 1897 in the progrom of Kishinev.

11. Jews were led to seek emancipation through participation in various political parties like the Social Democratic Party of 1898 to 1912 which had split into the Bolsheviks, Menchaviks and the Jewish bund party in 1903. It must be emphasized that the Jewish bund party of (Socialists) did not get along with the Bolsheviks.

12. A revolution initiated in 1905. The result? More progroms like in Odessa and the deaths of over 100 Jews in minsk central square station.

13. A Parliament was created because of the amount of revolutionist. The Russian Parliment was becimeral meaning it was divided in two parts: The State Duma, and the Upper house. This Parliament did nothing as the Tsar had the power to veto legislation which is precisely what he did.

14. By the third Duma (1907-1912) the peasants were deprived of their franchise and the electoral rights of their landed gentry. This led to a loyal Duma. Source: Russia A History. With the Tsars opposition growing in the first two state Dumas. The Government's response was to desolve them against the constitution, and changing the electoral system in order to produce a more compliant assembly. This is the context in which we can see the autocratic rule that served as an incentive for the Jewish political orientation towards more radical political parties. 

16 The way to demonstrate the Jews motivation in leaning towards more radical parties such as the Bolsheviks for example, the Pale Settlements need to be scrutinized.

17. Participation in the Bolsheviks party was extended to other ethnic minorites like the Latvians. 80% of the Russian population were of the peasantry class which were excluded from maintaining essential roles in the Bolsheviks party's program.

80% of that peasantry class does not mean 80%  WHERE JEWISH as Hitlarian Leftist clowns suggest.

18. The Socialist Revolutionaries were another leftist group that was able to amass the majority of the votes in the 1917 elections at the constituent assembly.

19. The Socialist Revolutionaries emphasized less on industrialization and based their support on the interest of the Russian peasantry class.

20. Apart from the Jews, the Military 40.4% plus fleet vote and the Levonian people voted in droves for the Bolsheviks. A whopping 71.85% of the Levonian votes went to the Bolsheviks. The Levonian people WERE NOT JEWISH. The MILITARY DID NOT CONSIST OF MOSTLY JEWISH PEOPLE.

https://youtu.be/1z3F0bEebPw

essay on liberalism.

C-GPT:

Liberalism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual rights, democracy, and free markets. It has its roots in the Enlightenment era and has evolved over time in response to political and social changes. The principles of liberalism are highly valued by many people and have had a significant impact on the world.

One of the core principles of liberalism is individual rights. Liberals believe that individuals have inherent rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property, that should be protected by the government. This principle is based on the idea that individuals are the best judges of their own interests, and that they should be free to pursue their own goals and aspirations as long as they do not harm others.

Another important principle of liberalism is democracy. Liberals believe that political power should be vested in the people, and that government should be accountable to the people through free and fair elections. This principle is based on the idea that all individuals should have an equal say in how they are governed, and that political decisions should reflect the will of the majority.

Free markets are also a core principle of liberalism. Liberals believe that free markets are the best way to allocate resources and that government intervention in the economy should be minimal. They argue that competition and innovation are essential for economic growth and that government regulations can stifle these forces.

Social liberalism is a variant of liberalism that focuses on issues such as civil rights, social justice, and individual freedom. Social liberals believe that government has a responsibility to protect and promote individual rights and freedoms, and that it should work to address social and economic inequalities. They support policies such as affirmative action, same-sex marriage, and universal healthcare.

Critics of liberalism argue that it is too focused on individualism and that it neglects the needs of the community. They point out that many of the principles of liberalism are more favorable to those with wealth and power, and that they do not take into account the needs of the less privileged. Additionally, some critics argue that liberalism is too focused on materialistic values, and that it neglects the spiritual and cultural dimensions of human life.

Despite these criticisms, liberalism remains an important political philosophy in many parts of the world. It has played a significant role in shaping the political landscape, particularly in the United States, where liberalism has been an influential force in politics since the founding of the nation.

In recent years, liberalism has faced challenges from populist movements, such as the Tea Party in the United States and the Brexit movement in the United Kingdom. These movements have challenged the established political order and have questioned the assumptions and values of liberalism.

In conclusion, liberalism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual rights, democracy, and free markets. While it has faced criticisms from some quarters, it remains a highly valued philosophy for many people around the world. Its principles have had a significant impact on the political and social landscape, and will continue to do so in the future.

After a half day of work and a gym session I’m already in the weekend mood!
And these pics are just in theme: Some nighttime London vibes from Thursday evening. You can see where the majority of individuals might go after work. There are a huge amount of people in the pups, and I've never seen so many people drinking while standing in another country, lol. When it comes to this, the British are quite laid back. Cheers!
Happy Friday everyone!
#SomeeEvolution #Somee #OriginalContentOnly #GymDay #WeekendMood

#TopAnswerRevealed
JED asked dr.ar, If we are to #dye his hair with a #funkycolour which one would he go for???
#Majority of the Someeian said-- #ElectricSoftBlue ?!
dr.ar said--???
So.. dr.ar can you tell us the reason behind your #TopAnswer?
TopAnswerReveal post created by dr.ar

#PollUpdate
Majority of the Someeian believe that #ElectricSoftBlue will suits dr.ar the best. But is it the one he has chosen for himself??
#Topanswer will be announce tomorrow, its not too late to lock in your votes! https://somee.social/posts/689956. Click the link and join the #SoMeeFeudFever
We love reading the #comments section wherein people are trying to #justify their answers! The best thing is none of the choices are missed out! hmmm...Imagine dr.ar having all of those hair dye? We might as well use all them in one go and come out to this...What do you guys think??? Will it suits him better?

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON FEBRUARY 5, 2023 • ( 27 COMMENTS

If we told you 20 million people had died across just the ‘FIve Eyes’ & 26 countries across Europe over the past two years resulting in the most excess deaths seen in half a decade wouldn’t you at least be a little bit curious to find out why?

You might be quick to blame Covid-19, but we can assure you this is not the case.

What if we then told you more excess deaths were actually recorded across the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand in 2021 & 2022 following several mass rollouts of the Covid-19 injections than were recorded at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020?

Would that not pique your interest to find out why?

Because we’re not just talking about a slight increase. We’re talking about increases of thousands of per cent in excess deaths.

For instance. official Government reports prove that Australia suffered a shocking 1,640% increase in excess deaths in just 39 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

While New Zealand suffered a shocking 3,404% increase in excess deaths in 49 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

Are you still not interested?
Well, what if we told you there now exists a mountain of evidence to prove that Covid-19 injections are to blame for this huge increase in deaths?

Surely now you’d want to know why?
What if we then revealed that sadly, that mountain of evidence also contains documents that prove Covid-19 vaccination is going to lead to mass depopulation?

This is of course an extremely bold claim to make.

‘Your Government is trying to kill you’ is even bolder.

But it’s the truth.

And surely you are now more than curious to find out why?

To summarise, the answer is simple…
From a young age, you have been conditioned to trust and obey authority without question. You have been trained to believe they would never lie to you.

The elite and corporations know that the majority of the public are too trusting of the government and mainstream media, and as a result, to solve the incoming problem of hundreds of millions, if not billions of people becoming “useless eaters” and a liability and burden due to AI and robotics taking their jobs, they came up with a plan to depopulate the planet.

And that plan involved the invention or exaggeration of a pandemic and the roll-out of a deadly vaccine.

And we can prove it…
Pfizer lied, 20 million and counting died
Secret reports from the Governments of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK and most of Europe have raised alarm bells as they confirm that approximately 20 million deaths have been recorded resulting in 2 million excess deaths since Pfizer lied enabling the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.

Sadly, further reports quietly published by the UK Government also confirm that mortality rates are lowest among the unvaccinated in every single age group.

This, therefore, proves that Pfizer’s lies have caused millions to die and the Covd-19 injections are by far the largest contributing factor to the millions of excess deaths seen across the ‘Five Eyes’ and most of Europe

Europe
Official figures provided to EuroMOMO by the UK Government and 26 other Governments of counties across Europe reveal that most of the continent suffered 375,253 excess deaths in 2021 and 404,6000 excess deaths in 2022.

This equates to 779,853 excess deaths over the two years. The figures do not include Ukraine so cannot be blamed on the ongoing war.

Australia
Australia suffered 11,068 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 22,730 excess deaths by week 38 of 2022. This is in stark contrast to 2020, when only 1,306 excess deaths were recorded at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.

This means Australia suffered a shocking 1,640% increase in excess deaths in just 39 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

New Zealand
New Zealand suffered 2,169 excess deaths in 2021 and then a shocking 5,286 excess deaths by week 49 of 2022. These are shocking figures for the small island with an estimated population of 5 million people.

Especially when compared to 2020, when no excess deaths were suffered and 160 fewer deaths were actually recorded than expected at the height of the Covid pandemic and prior to the rollout of the Covid injections.

This means New Zealand suffered a shocking 3,404% increase in excess deaths in 49 weeks throughout 2022 compared to 53 weeks throughout 2020.

Read more: https://expose-news.com/2023/02/05/depopulation-covid-vaccination-plan-all-along/

This says shiba inu holders still sitting at a loss? Interesting as most i know got at .000000 6 zeros or even 7 zeros in price . The ath is about 4zeros8.
https://dailyhodl.com/2023/02/04/over-60-of-dogecoin-holders-in-profit-while-majority-of-shiba-inu-investors-sitting-on-losses-intotheblock/

#TopAnswerRevealed by MineYourMind
For the first time in SoMeeFeud the #majority of votes won!!!
Get ready for the #SoMeeFeudWheel. Let's see who will win the 20KSME

Since they will have a month of #holiday and wanted to see #family, our #friends took a flight to #Brazil. Since it's #Friday and we've transitioned to the weekend mindset, I felt this video from their last Sunday #beach session that they shared me is exactly what we all need. Even if the majority of us for a variety of reasons are unable to be at the beach right now, we join them in our thoughts.
Happy Friday everyone!
#SomeeEvolution #Somee #OriginalContentOnly #WeekendVibe #GuarapariBeach

EkimadzaboutYou's #TopAnswerReveal is coming in your timeline screen shortly! Lock in your final #TopAnswer vote!

Poll link: https://somee.social/posts/687564

A game wherein NOT all the time the #Majority wins!