I have been looking at some investment properties, and I have been reading some books relating to real estate and taxes. I can't wait unit I can buy my warrant for stocks from Edly (https://www.edly.co). I hope for the best.

The GreyWarden deconstructs a Marxist Black Hand's dissertation. Enjoy reading our discussion and tell me who you think has the stronger arguments.

@Iblegend > I respectfully disagree with the argument presented. The definition of socialism varies depending on the particular ideology or political movement, and it is not accurate to claim that one specific interpretation is the only valid one. Furthermore, the argument seems to conflate different concepts and historical examples in a way that is not accurate or supported by evidence

Greywarden > And i thank you for actually debating the subject with me rather than running away. And no, definitions do not vary, they are clear cut. Socialism is the collective control or ownership of the means of production or state control of the economy. And you haven't proven how the arguments conflate different concepts that are unsupported by evidence. There is a plethora of evidence for the murder of the Kulax and for what were the intentions of the Marxist Socialists. But whatever.

@Iblegend > Firstly, the argument seems to suggest that collective control of the means of production can only be achieved by a specific group, such as a race, gender, or class collective. However, this is not necessarily the case. Socialism is based on the idea that the means of production should be owned and controlled collectively by society as a whole, rather than by private individuals or corporations. This can be achieved through a variety of means, such as worker cooperatives, state ownership, or community ownership

Greywarden > I never excluded society. You are creating a Strawman. Public Control, State Control, National Control, Group Control, Race Control, Worker Control or ownership of any of these are different forms of Socialism. I never claimed they are all the same. But for you to suggest that some how they are Capitalism because some forms of socialism are different is precisely where your error is, and you can't find a solution to this problem. I see you returned to the Corporation Fallacy again. Corporations are not Private, they are Publicly held and traded. Private cannot be Public Simultaneously and are two completely different things. Private individuals are you, i and Jose. If a collective owns or controls our economy than we as individuals are slaves of the State. Capitalism is none State. How do you address this problem?

@Iblegend > Secondly, the argument suggests that corporations are public sector entities and are a form of state-controlled syndicates. While it is true that some corporations are partially or wholly owned by the state, the majority of corporations are privately owned and operated for the benefit of their shareholders.

Greywarden > The above presents a major problem for you. You just said they are operated for the benefit of their shareholders? If Corporations are traded in the Stock Exchange than they aren't Private. They are owned by Society which is the Public. You make it seem as if Public Ownership is the samething as Private Ownership. No, Corporations aren't Privately owned. They are owned by a collective which is Society not indviduals. Even the "Private Corporations" are not Privately owned. If you look into the Koch Brothers Corporations you will see that a collective owns them. David Koch only had 42% ownership of Koch brothers industry before he died. There are a plethora of Coprations bundled together with the Koch brothers Industries. By definition they aren't really private, even if the Central State weren't to control them as they are controlled by their own collective who are deeply involved in Politics and swaying elections through dark money.

@Iblegend > Corporations operate within a market economy, where the means of production are owned by private individuals or corporations, not by society as a whole. This is fundamentally different from the socialist ideal of collective ownership and control of the means of production

Greywarden > No no no, that is rubbish. The Private Individual does not own the means of production of the Market Economy. The market is state controlled which gives the state defacto ownership of the means of production, not the private individual as you assert.

Greywarden > The majority of Corporation are in the Stock Exchange which are Publicly Traded and State Controlled which in turn is Socialism not Capitalism. The Public owns Corporations. The Public Sector cannot simultaneously be the Private Sector. Furthermore, to conclude that Socialism is none Market is erroneous. Marxism may be non market. But in no way does Marxism define Socialism accurately other than being another form of Socialism. If a Market is controlled by the State, then it isn't a free market and thus not a Capitalist Market. You do not accurately understand the definition of Socialism. Just because a Market exists does not automatically mean it is a Capitalist Market.

Greywarden > Moreover, where there are Black Markets, that only means there is Socialism. Black Markets cannot exist in Capitalist Economies where everyone is fending for themselves. The U.S has a black market which proves it is a Socialist Economy. The Black Markets are the Capitalists lol.

Greywarden > But if you still believe the individual has private ownership in the U.S. Why don't you put this to the test. Buy a home with Cash without depending on banks. Then try never agreeing to pay your property taxes. Comeback to me and tell me if you are able to keep your home. You are not a private owner of what you are led to believe is your own property. Even Cuba is more Capitalist when it comes to property. Any property that are Purchased in Cuba are yours and you aren't tax for it. The property actually belongs to you the individual..

@Iblegend > Thirdly, the argument makes an inaccurate and unfair comparison between socialism and fascism. Fascism is a far-right ideology that is based on authoritarianism, nationalism, and the suppression of individual rights and freedoms.

Greywarden > You haven't proven that Fascism is a Far Right Ideology. Doesn't seem like you have read the works of Mussolini as i have been doing. Mussolini had State Control of the Means of Production during his Reign. Mussolini said like this in his speech in Milan and you can look it up if you'd like, "Everything in the State, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state." If you study Mussolini closely, which i am sure you haven't. You will see that Mussolini Socialized the people through their Italian Nationality. His Socialism was based on the Italian Nationality as he tried to bring all Italians together under the State. There is no possible way Mussolini was a Capitalist. Mussolini and even the inventor of Fascism Gentile were opponents of Capitalism. They hated Capitalism! Moreover, Nationalism and Socialism are one and the same. To Nationalise a business is the same as Socialising a Business. To Nationalise the people is the same as Socialisng the people. What exactly is the difference between Nationalizing the Economy or Socializing the Economy? What is the difference between Nationalization of the Private Sector or Socialization of the Private Sector? You tell me..

@Iblegend > It is not accurate to claim that fascism is a form of socialism, or that Mussolini was a socialist. Mussolini and the fascist regime in Italy were fiercely anti-socialist and anti-communist, and actively suppressed socialist and labor movements.

Greywarden > Actually they weren't Anti-Socialist lol. Mussolini tried to end the Class Crisis Marxism had caused by offering people another version of Socialism Gentile called Fascism. Mussolini was the man that put Gentile's ideas into practice. Mussolini offered Fascism as a third way between Marxism and Capitalism. Even if you are able to prove that Mussolini hated Marxism because he was kicked out of the Marxist anti war party of Italy for being a warmonger. You still can't prove that by default that makes him a Capitalist as he also hated Capitalism. You see, your ideas blind you from the facts that Mussolini hated Capitalism as well, and thus couldn't be a Capitalist just because he was not a Marxist.

@Iblegend > Finally, the argument suggests that individualism and collectivism are polar opposites, and that socialism necessarily entails state control of the economy and the suppression of individual freedom. However, this is a simplistic and inaccurate view of both individualism and collectivism. In reality, most political and economic systems contain elements of both individualism and collectivism, and the relationship between the two is complex and multifaceted. It is possible to have a socialist system that allows for individual autonomy and freedom, while still maintaining collective control over the means of production.

Greywarden > There is no argument that says that Collectivism and Individualism are Polar Opposites. Collectivism and Individualism by definition are Polar Opposites and that is a fact. The only reason why some socialist economies allow for some individual freedoms is because they haven't implemented full socialism. Individual ownership and control of your own economy is Capitalism not Socialism. You haven't proven how individualism can be one and the same as collectivism. You are dancing around the points I've made by trying to prove that Individualism can mean two things at once which isn't possible. And mocking arguments you can't refute by calling them simplistic does not make your case that Individualism can mean the same thing as Collectivism stronger. It actually exposes a huge contradiction with your line of reasoning that you can't resolve.

@Iblegend > In conclusion, the argument presented contains several inaccuracies and conflations of different concepts and historical examples. It is important to approach these complex issues with nuance and accuracy, rather than resorting to simplistic and inaccurate comparisons and generalizations.

Greywarden > Again you accuse me of being simplistic because i am taking definitions of terms at face value and not trying to explain away how Private can mean Public at the same time and how an individual can mean a collective at the same time. If you weren't blinded by the doctrines of Marxists you would be able to see how illogical your position is. You are not going to win a debate through illogic

Every year the IRS publishes a detailed report on the taxes it collects. And the statistics are REALLY interesting.

️Equinox - $EQNOX️

After being in a clear uptrend since last October we have clearly found a local bottom and it’s time to buy the dip!

Equinox is the foundation of the Atlas Ecosystem. With the upcoming launch of ATLAS token EQNOX is positioned to do really well on the coming months.

EQNOX stakes provide utility for ATLAS in multiple ways.

For every 0.1% of the EQNOX shares supply you hold you will get:
- 3% bonus shares when staking ATLAS
- 10% bonus power when bidding on the auction
- 5% discount on ATLAS trading taxes

EQNOX price will also rise and LP will thicken through buybacks and liquidity injections funded from 20% of ATLAS buy taxes.

Get yourself a bag before April 9th when ATLAS launches because the hype will be out of control by then!

Equinox Links:
https://t.me/eqnox_token
https://eqnox-token.com
https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x95DC089D49bd5b22E60113fFBCD2f17FB7Aa3268

Atlas Links:
https://twitter.com/atlas_equinox
https://t.me/eq_atlas_token
https://atlas-token.com/#/whitepaper

#taxes #crypto #leo #finance #pay #pesos #pob #somee
https://youtu.be/kOb7qLNTrBg

Brace Yourself for Bidenflation on Steroids: The Battle of UBI vs Reparations
Democrats in US cities are implementing Black Panther-inspired guaranteed #income programs or reparations for historic racism. Welfare experts say the programs are too costly for federal funding. Beneficiaries pay for food, utilities, education, and transportation. Naturally, the policies raise #taxes, #inflation, #poverty, and #unemployment. https://youtube.com/shorts/l0NxL0D1pP4 #inflation #biden #someeofficial #cent #sme #vyb #oneup #hbit #leo #leofinance

Libertarianism:

a political philosophy that emphasizes individual freedom and autonomy. Libertarians believe that individuals should have the freedom to do as they please, as long as they do not harm others or infringe upon their rights. They support limited government intervention in both economic and personal affairs and believe that free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources and promote prosperity.

At the core of libertarianism is the belief that individuals have natural rights that are inherent to their being, such as the right to life, liberty, and property. Libertarians believe that the role of government should be limited to protecting these rights, and that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests without interference.

In terms of economic policy, libertarians advocate for free markets, minimal regulation, and low taxes. They believe that individuals and businesses should be free to engage in voluntary transactions without interference from the government. Libertarians believe that free markets promote innovation, efficiency, and prosperity, and that government intervention in the economy often leads to inefficiencies and unintended consequences.

In terms of personal liberties, libertarians believe in individual autonomy and the right to make choices about one's own life without interference from the government. They support the decriminalization of victimless crimes such as drug use, gambling, and prostitution. Libertarians also believe in the right to privacy and oppose government surveillance and intrusion into personal matters.

One potential drawback of libertarianism is that it can lead to a lack of social safety nets and protections for vulnerable individuals. Libertarians believe that individuals should be responsible for their own well-being and that voluntary charity is the best way to support those in need. However, some argue that this approach can be inadequate, particularly for those who are unable to support themselves due to circumstances beyond their control.

In summary, libertarianism is a political philosophy that emphasizes individual freedom, limited government intervention, and free markets. Libertarians believe that individuals should have the freedom to pursue their own interests without interference from the government, and that free markets are the most efficient way to allocate resources and promote prosperity. While libertarianism has some potential drawbacks, it remains a popular political philosophy among those who value individual autonomy and limited government intervention.

If you are earning 3.0% a year interest on a $25000 investment then what would the earnings look like?
**********************************************************

C-GPT:
If you are earning a 3.0% annual interest rate on a $25,000 investment, your earnings will depend on how often the interest is compounded and whether any additional deposits or withdrawals are made. Assuming that the interest is compounded annually and that no additional deposits or withdrawals are made, your earnings for a one-year period would be:

Interest earned = $25,000 x 0.03 = $750

So in one year, you would earn $750 in interest on your $25,000 investment.

If the interest is compounded more frequently, such as semi-annually or quarterly, your earnings would be slightly higher due to the effect of compounding. For example, if the interest is compounded semi-annually, your earnings for a one-year period would be:

Interest earned = $25,000 x (1 + 0.03/2)^2 - $25,000 = $763.81

If you make additional deposits or withdrawals during the year, your earnings would also be affected. For example, if you make a $5,000 withdrawal during the year, your earnings for the year would be:

Interest earned = ($25,000 - $5,000) x 0.03 = $600

So your earnings would be $600 in this scenario.

It's important to note that the interest rate can vary over time and that these calculations are based on the assumption that the interest rate remains constant. Additionally, taxes and other fees may also affect your earnings.

If you want $100,000 & start by putting $100 & every 2 weeks into a savings account with a 3.0% interest rate... then...?
**************************************************************
C-GPT:
If you start with an initial investment of $100 and then make additional deposits of $100 every two weeks (bi-weekly) into a savings account with a 3.0% interest rate, the time it takes for the account balance to reach $100,000 will depend on several factors, including the frequency of compounding and the number of years you continue to make the deposits.

Assuming that the interest is compounded bi-weekly and that no withdrawals are made, it would take approximately 49 years and 3 months (or 589 bi-weekly deposits) for the account balance to reach $100,000.

The formula to calculate the future value of a series of regular deposits, such as bi-weekly deposits, is as follows:

FV = PMT x [(1 + r/n)^(nt) - 1] / (r/n)

Where:

FV is the future value of the investment
PMT is the regular payment (in this case, $100)
r is the annual interest rate (3.0%)
n is the number of times interest is compounded per year (26, for bi-weekly compounding)
t is the number of years
Plugging in the numbers, we get:

$100,000 = $100 x [(1 + 0.03/26)^(26*49.25) - 1] / (0.03/26)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

$100,000 = $100 x 196.72

So it would take approximately 49 years and 3 months (or 589 bi-weekly deposits) for the account balance to reach $100,000, assuming that the interest is compounded bi-weekly and no withdrawals are made. However, it's important to note that interest rates and account fees can fluctuate over time, and there may be other factors to consider, such as inflation and taxes, when making investment decisions.

(yeah, it would be difficult, but with crypto.... lol)

If you start with $1000 & you want to get to $500,000 in 10 years, then what would that take to achieve?
**********************************************************

C-GPT:
To calculate the annual growth rate needed to turn an initial investment of $1000 into $500,000 in 10 years, we can use the following formula:

FV = PV x (1 + r)^n

where:

FV is the future value or target amount ($500,000 in this case)
PV is the present value or initial investment ($1000)
r is the annual growth rate we want to find
n is the number of periods (10 years in this case)
Plugging in these values, we get:

$500,000 = $1000 x (1 + r)^10

Simplifying the equation, we get:

(1 + r)^10 = 500

Taking the 10th root of both sides, we get:

1 + r = 500^(1/10)

Solving for r, we get:

r = (500^(1/10)) - 1 = 0.2665 = 26.65%

Therefore, an annual growth rate of approximately 26.65% would be needed to turn an initial investment of $1000 into $500,000 in 10 years. This is a very high growth rate and would be difficult to achieve through most conventional investment methods. It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the returns are compounded annually and do not take into account taxes, fees, or other factors that could affect the actual returns.

With inflation raging across America, an Iowa lawmaker seeks to end one of the strongest disincentives to owning and using #gold and #silver: capital gains taxes.

C-GPT, write an essay in support of the military industrial complex in the US
****************************************************
The military industrial complex in the United States refers to the close relationship between the military, government, and private defense contractors, who work together to produce weapons and other military equipment. The military industrial complex has been a controversial issue for many years, with some arguing that it is necessary to ensure national security and protect American interests abroad, while others believe that it undermines democratic principles and leads to waste, corruption, and overspending. In this essay, I will argue that the military industrial complex is a necessary and beneficial aspect of the American political and economic system.

First and foremost, the military industrial complex is essential for national security. The United States faces numerous threats, both at home and abroad, and must have a well-equipped and well-trained military in order to protect its citizens and interests. The military industrial complex provides the government with the resources and expertise necessary to develop and maintain a strong and capable military force. The close relationship between the military and private defense contractors ensures that the latest technological advancements are integrated into military equipment and that the military has access to the best possible resources and equipment.

In addition, the military industrial complex provides important economic benefits to the United States. The defense industry is one of the largest employers in the country, providing jobs to millions of Americans and supporting local economies. The industry also contributes significantly to the country's GDP, and provides a significant amount of revenue to the government through taxes and other fees. The military industrial complex therefore not only supports national security, but also provides a strong and stable economic foundation for the country.

Furthermore, the military industrial complex provides important technological advancements that have far-reaching benefits for society. The development of new weapons and military equipment often leads to technological breakthroughs that have important civilian applications. For example, the development of radar technology during World War II has led to advances in medical imaging and air traffic control, while the development of GPS technology has transformed the way people navigate and find their way. These advancements would not have been possible without the resources and expertise provided by the military industrial complex.

Finally, it is important to recognize that the military industrial complex is subject to rigorous oversight and regulation, ensuring that the government is able to control and manage the use of its resources effectively. This ensures that the military industrial complex operates in the best interests of the country and its citizens, rather than being driven by corporate interests or other agendas.

In conclusion, the military industrial complex is a necessary and beneficial aspect of the American political and economic system. It provides essential resources and expertise for national security, contributes to the economy and job market, drives technological advancements, and is subject to effective oversight and regulation. These benefits, taken together, make it clear that the military industrial complex is an important and valuable aspect of American society.

El Salvador's Bitcoin Law: A Major Shift for Digital Currency Adoption?

El Salvador has recently made headlines with its approval of a controversial and unprecedented cryptocurrency law. This law, proposed by President Nayib Bukele, is the first of its kind in the world and seeks to make bitcoin legal tender in El Salvador. The move signals a major shift for both El Salvador and Bitcoin as it marks an important milestone for digital currency adoption around the globe.

The new legislation will allow citizens to pay taxes using bitcoin, while businesses will be able to accept payments in either U.S dollars or bitcoins without any additional fees or commissions from financial institutions such as banks or credit unions. Additionally, all transactions involving cryptocurrencies are exempt from capital gains tax which further incentivizes use within El Salvador's economy - something that could potentially drive economic growth within the country over time if adopted widely enough across society .

President Bukele has been vocal about his support for cryptocurrencies since taking office in 2019 and this latest move serves as evidence of his commitment towards driving innovation through blockchain technology at home - something he believes can bring greater prosperity to all citizens regardless of their socio-economic background . He hopes that this bold decision will encourage other countries around Latin America (and even beyond) to follow suit when it comes embracing digital currencies like Bitcoin into their respective economies too!

This news reaffirms President Bukele’s bet on Bitcoin being one step closer towards becoming mainstream globally – especially now that people have access not only buy/sell but also transact with them legally within El Salvadorean borders! It remains unclear what impact this new legislation may have on global crypto markets however we should expect more nations looking into similar measures soon given how quickly things are progressing here today; so stay tuned folks!

Bitcoin has already seen widespread adoption in El Salvador. Over 2,000 businesses in the country accept bitcoin, including restaurants, hotels, and even a gas station. The government is also working on a project to use bitcoin to pay for water bills and other utilities.

The new law is a major step forward for cryptocurrency adoption but it is not without its critics. Some have raised concerns about the volatile nature of bitcoin and its potential to be used for criminal activity. Others have questioned the feasibility of implementing such a system in a country with a large unbanked population.

Despite the criticism, the move is a positive step forward for cryptocurrency adoption and is likely to spur other countries to follow suit.

Japan’s Borrowing: The Reasons Behind the Country’s High Debt Levels.

Japan is one of the most indebted countries in the world, and it’s a surprising fact that they continue to borrow money despite their massive debt burden. The reasons behind Japan’s high levels of debt are complex and multifaceted, but there are some key factors that explain why this nation continues to take on more debt.

One reason for Japan's large amount of national debt is its aging population. As people live longer lives and birth rates remain low, fewer workers exist to pay taxes into government coffers while elderly citizens require more medical care than ever before. This means that the Japanese government must find new sources of revenue or increase borrowing in order to fund social programs for its aging citizens.

Another factor contributing to Japan's growing debts has been its reliance on public works projects as an economic stimulus measure since the 1980s recession hit hard in Asia following World War II ended up leaving many Japanese companies bankrupted or struggling financially . These projects have often been expensive investments with little return which has caused further strain on public finances over time leading them having no choice but taking out loans from abroad lenders like China & US banks etc., resulting even higher level of foreign debts piling up each year .

Last but not least , another major contributor towards rising national debts can be attributed due largely by expansive monetary policy adopted by Bank Of japan (BOJ) during past two decades especially after 2008 Global Financial Crisis where BOJ was forced into quantitative easing program causing unprecedented surge liquidity across markets which led investors seeking higher yield elsewhere such as buying bonds issued by central governments thereby driving down yields & increasing cost interest payments thus making it difficult for country make ends meet without additional funds coming from outside sources i-e global financial institutions/lenders .

Despite all these challenges , however , thanks prudent fiscal management along with strong export based economy still able maintain relatively healthy balance sheet when compared other nations around world so far allowing them access capital needed finance current expenditures while also keeping inflation under control at same time ensuring sustainable growth future generations come .

Eddie Murphy won a price on Golden Globe. According to him there's three things if you wanna be successful as him.
" 1. Pay your taxes
2. Mind your business
3. Keep Will Smith’s Wife’s Name Out Your F***ing Mouth"