• ‘Operation Al-Aqsa Flood’ Day 169: Israel kills 7 aid-seekers in northern Gaza, 4 children in Rafah as siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day
    Israel continued its airstrikes on Rafah, killing four children, while in northern Gaza Israel turned back food aid for the second time in a week and killed at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers near the Kuwaiti roundabout.

    Mondoweiss Palestine BureauMarch 23, 2024
    Injured Palestinians, including children, brought to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza following Israeli attacks on March 23, 2024. (Photo: Ali Hamad/APA Images)
    Injured Palestinians, including children, brought to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza following Israeli attacks on March 23, 2024. (Photo: Ali Hamad/APA Images)
    Casualties

    32,070+ killed* and at least 74,412 wounded in the Gaza Strip.
    435+ Palestinians killed in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.**
    Israel revises its estimated October 7 death toll down from 1,400 to 1,147.
    590 Israeli soldiers have been killed since October 7, and at least 3,221 injured.***
    *Gaza’s Ministry of Health confirmed this figure on its Telegram channel on March 22, 2024. Some rights groups put the death toll number closer to 35,000 when accounting for those presumed dead.

    ** The death toll in West Bank and Jerusalem is not updated regularly. According to PA’s Ministry of Health on March 6, this is the latest figure.

    *** This figure is released by the Israeli military, showing the soldiers whose names “were allowed to be published.”

    Advertisement

    Subscribe to the Mondoweiss YouTube Channel!
    Key Developments

    Israeli airstrikes on Rafah continue, killing four children in a residential home and injuring several others.
    UN General Secretary Antonio Guterres visits Rafah, calls blocking of aid “moral outrage.”
    Israeli siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day, army reportedly sets buildings on fire around hospital, tortures and kills civilians who attempt to evacuate.
    Israeli army kills at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers at aid distribution point near Kuwaiti roundabout in northern Gaza.
    New UN Security Council resolution calling for immediate ceasefire postponed to Monday, March 25.
    Martyred Palestinian, who injured 7 Israeli soldiers near Kufr Ni’ma ambushed soldiers after chase, targeted soldiers with sniper fire during five-hour standoff, according to Ynet.
    136 Palestinian journalists in Gaza killed since October, says Gaza media office.
    Siege of al-Shifa enters sixth day, airstrikes on Rafah kill 4 children

    Israel’s siege on al-Shifa Hospital has entered its sixth consecutive day. The government media office in Gaza released a statement saying it holds the U.S. and the international community responsible for Israel’s “crime” perpetrated against al-Shifa’s doctors, staff, patients, and the displaced people sheltering at the medical compound. As reported by Al Jazeera, the media office said that the Israeli army was bombing buildings inside the medical complex and engaging in acts of torture and extrajudicial field executions.

    The Israeli army claims it has arrested over 170 Hamas fighters and 800 suspects at al-Shifa. Moreover, according to Al Jazeera, the Israeli army has reportedly set fire to the buildings around the hospital.

    The siege on al-Shifa comes in the context of Israel’s attempt to target civil employees and members of the police in Gaza who were based in al-Shifa, in an attempt to sow civil unrest and cause a breakdown in social order in the north. Claiming these civil employees to be “top Hamas operatives,” Israel assassinated the Director of the Operations of the Gaza Police, Faiq Mabhouh, on March 18. Mabhouh was an instrumental figure in successfully coordinating the delivery of humanitarian aid to northern Gaza in cooperation with international organizations, local tribes, and UNRWA. In light of the widespread compliance of the populace with the directives of Gaza’s civil employees, Israel has laid siege to al-Shifa, where many of them are based. Israel continues to claim that these civil and police employees are Hamas and Islamic Jihad fighters, despite offering no evidence to back up its claims.

    The Gaza government media office said that the Israeli army has threatened al-Shifa’s hospital’s staff and displaced civilians that the buildings they are staying in will be bombed in the event that they do not evacuate. The media office based its statement on testimonies from people who remain stranded inside the medical compound as Israel lays siege to it, asserting that those who have evacuated the buildings are either arrested, tortured, or killed, as reported by Middle East Eye.

    MEE also reported that six wounded patients in the hospital died amid the Israeli siege due to the lack of medical care, quoting the Gaza Ministry of Health as saying that “besieged medical teams and patients are appealing to UN institutions and the international community to intervene urgently to save their lives.”

    In southern Gaza, Israel continued its airstrikes on Rafah and Khan Younis, killing several civilians. In one airstrike on the north of the city of Rafah, five civilians were killed, four of them children, following the bombing of a two-story residential building in the Mirage area, reports Wafa.

    The number of casualties from Israeli airstrikes and shelling in the last 24 hours has risen to 72 people killed and 114 injured.

    Meanwhile, on Friday, the Israeli army released a statement on X saying that it had opened an investigation into the incident of the deliberate killing of four unarmed Palestinian men in civilian clothing in Khan Younis last February by an Israeli attack drone, the footage of which recently came to light after Al Jazeera obtained from sources in Gaza. The footage of the deliberate killing of the unarmed men made shockwaves, highlighting Israel’s deliberate policy of killing civilians.

    Gaza drone video shows killing of Palestinians in Israeli air attack | Al Jazeera Newsfeed
    ‘The unbearable cannot become the new normal’

    In a statement on X, Philippe Lazzarini, head of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), said that food aid had been denied to northern Gaza for the second time in a week.

    “Today, the Israeli Authorities denied another UNRWA convoy with much needed food supplies from going to the north where people are on the verge of famine,” the UNRWA chief said. “The last time UNRWA was able to send food aid to the north was nearly 2 month [sic] ago.”

    Lazzarini went on to say that Israel the “man made hunger & looming famine” in Gaza could still be averted if Israel allowed “delivering food aid at scale to the north including via UNRWA, the largest humanitarian organisation in Gaza.”

    “Meanwhile, children will continue to die of malnutrition & dehydration under our watch,” he added. “The unbearable cannot become the new normal.”

    By late afternoon, Al Jazeera correspondents reported that Israeli shelling on Palestinian aid-seekers at the Kuwaiti roundabout had killed at least seven people. This latest attack on civilians at aid distribution points comes after the assassination of Faiq Mabhouh and Gaza’s civil employees, who were instrumental in organizing orderly deliveries of aid to Gaza without resulting in these Israeli attacks on starving Palestinians. The most infamous of such attacks was the “Flour Massacre” on March 3, which killed over 100 people.

    Meanwhile, 7,000 trucks carrying humanitarian aid and food aid are currently stationed outside the Rafah crossing, waiting to enter the besieged Gaza Strip. As reported by Al Jazeera, the governor of North Sinai, Muhammad Shousha, said that the Israeli inspection procedures are holding up the flow of trucks into Gaza.

    Shousha received UN General Secretary Antonio Guterres at al-Arish Airport in the Egyptian Sinai for the UN chief’s planned visit to the Rafah border crossing later today. During his press conference at the Rafah crossing, Guterres lambasted the blocking of aid to Gaza as a “moral outrage” and said that he had made his trip to the border to shed light on the pain of Palestinians in Gaza.

    New UN Security Council resolution postponed to Monday

    Following China and Russia’s vetoing of the U.S.-led draft resolution for a Gaza ceasefire at the UN Security Council, a new resolution demanding an “immediate ceasefire” during Ramadan in advance of a more “permanent sustainable ceasefire” has been postponed to Monday, March 25, according to diplomatic sources that spoke to AFP, as reported on Al Mayadeen.

    In the earlier U.S.-led draft, China and Russia used their veto against the resolution, with Russia citing it as a “hypocritical spectacle” that contained an “effective green light” for Israel to continue its invasion of Rafah, while China believed that the resolution “dodged the most central issue, that of a ceasefire” through the use of nebulous language.”

    The ambiguous language to which Russia and China referred was the resolution’s emphasis on the “imperative of an immediate and sustained ceasefire,” instead of demanding its implementation in the short term. The U.S. resolution also condemned the Hamas-led attacks on October 7.

    West Bank: resistance operation and record settlement expansion

    In the West Bank, Israeli settlement building has reached a record high. As reported by Middle East Eye, the United Nations and Israeli rights group Peace Now have asserted that in 2023, Israel expanded its settlements at a record pace in the occupied West Bank. According to Peace Now, ten out of the 26 illegal outposts established in the West Bank were built after October 7, resulting in the forcible displacement of 21 Palestinian communities (16 of which were uprooted since the outbreak of the war). Meanwhile, UN human rights chief Volker Turk asserted that the record expansion of settlements risks eliminating the chances for a Palestinian state, and that 24,300 new settlement housing units were built in 2023, a record high since the UN began monitoring in 2017.

    Yesterday, a Palestinian man from the village of Kufr Ni’ma, west of Ramallah, launched a shooting operation against Israeli soldiers, injuring seven soldiers before an Israeli attack helicopter fired missiles on his position in the hills, killing him. New details have emerged since the incident that shed light on the nature of the resistance operation and detail the expertise of the shooter, identified as Mujahid Mansour.

    According to reports by Ynet and Quds News Network, Mansour had opened fire on a settler bus, resulting in no fatalities, before retreating and being chased by Israeli army vehicles. It would seem that Mansour was leading the soldiers into an ambush, perching himself on top of a hill and hiding behind trees and bushes. Mansour then proceeded to intermittently engage the forces with a sniper rifle from a distance, resulting in a standoff that lasted for five hours due to the inability of Israeli drones and helicopters to identify him as a result of poor weather. Mansour was able to down an Israeli drone with his rifle during the standoff, while at other times, he fell silent and maintained his cover, while the Israeli troops were reluctant to advance. An Israeli helicopter eventually launched a missile where he was hiding when the weather cleared. Reports have since emerged that Mansour was a member of the Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces.

    In preparation for the punitive demolition of Mansour’s family home, the Israeli army took measurements for the house on Saturday, Wafa reported. This is part of Israel’s larger policy of punitive home demolitions, in which the Israeli army destroys the homes of the families of Palestinians who launched attacks against Israel, which has been described as a policy of collective punishment.

    BEFORE YOU GO – At Mondoweiss, we understand the power of telling Palestinian stories. For 17 years, we have pushed back when the mainstream media published lies or echoed politicians’ hateful rhetoric. Now, Palestinian voices are more important than ever.

    Our traffic has increased ten times since October 7, and we need your help to cover our increased expenses.

    Support our journalists with a donation today.

    https://mondoweiss.net/2024/03/operation-al-aqsa-flood-day-169-israel-kills-7-aid-seekers-in-northern-gaza-4-children-in-rafah-as-siege-of-al-shifa-hospital-enters-sixth-day/
    ‘Operation Al-Aqsa Flood’ Day 169: Israel kills 7 aid-seekers in northern Gaza, 4 children in Rafah as siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day Israel continued its airstrikes on Rafah, killing four children, while in northern Gaza Israel turned back food aid for the second time in a week and killed at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers near the Kuwaiti roundabout. Mondoweiss Palestine BureauMarch 23, 2024 Injured Palestinians, including children, brought to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza following Israeli attacks on March 23, 2024. (Photo: Ali Hamad/APA Images) Injured Palestinians, including children, brought to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza following Israeli attacks on March 23, 2024. (Photo: Ali Hamad/APA Images) Casualties 32,070+ killed* and at least 74,412 wounded in the Gaza Strip. 435+ Palestinians killed in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.** Israel revises its estimated October 7 death toll down from 1,400 to 1,147. 590 Israeli soldiers have been killed since October 7, and at least 3,221 injured.*** *Gaza’s Ministry of Health confirmed this figure on its Telegram channel on March 22, 2024. Some rights groups put the death toll number closer to 35,000 when accounting for those presumed dead. ** The death toll in West Bank and Jerusalem is not updated regularly. According to PA’s Ministry of Health on March 6, this is the latest figure. *** This figure is released by the Israeli military, showing the soldiers whose names “were allowed to be published.” Advertisement Subscribe to the Mondoweiss YouTube Channel! Key Developments Israeli airstrikes on Rafah continue, killing four children in a residential home and injuring several others. UN General Secretary Antonio Guterres visits Rafah, calls blocking of aid “moral outrage.” Israeli siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day, army reportedly sets buildings on fire around hospital, tortures and kills civilians who attempt to evacuate. Israeli army kills at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers at aid distribution point near Kuwaiti roundabout in northern Gaza. New UN Security Council resolution calling for immediate ceasefire postponed to Monday, March 25. Martyred Palestinian, who injured 7 Israeli soldiers near Kufr Ni’ma ambushed soldiers after chase, targeted soldiers with sniper fire during five-hour standoff, according to Ynet. 136 Palestinian journalists in Gaza killed since October, says Gaza media office. Siege of al-Shifa enters sixth day, airstrikes on Rafah kill 4 children Israel’s siege on al-Shifa Hospital has entered its sixth consecutive day. The government media office in Gaza released a statement saying it holds the U.S. and the international community responsible for Israel’s “crime” perpetrated against al-Shifa’s doctors, staff, patients, and the displaced people sheltering at the medical compound. As reported by Al Jazeera, the media office said that the Israeli army was bombing buildings inside the medical complex and engaging in acts of torture and extrajudicial field executions. The Israeli army claims it has arrested over 170 Hamas fighters and 800 suspects at al-Shifa. Moreover, according to Al Jazeera, the Israeli army has reportedly set fire to the buildings around the hospital. The siege on al-Shifa comes in the context of Israel’s attempt to target civil employees and members of the police in Gaza who were based in al-Shifa, in an attempt to sow civil unrest and cause a breakdown in social order in the north. Claiming these civil employees to be “top Hamas operatives,” Israel assassinated the Director of the Operations of the Gaza Police, Faiq Mabhouh, on March 18. Mabhouh was an instrumental figure in successfully coordinating the delivery of humanitarian aid to northern Gaza in cooperation with international organizations, local tribes, and UNRWA. In light of the widespread compliance of the populace with the directives of Gaza’s civil employees, Israel has laid siege to al-Shifa, where many of them are based. Israel continues to claim that these civil and police employees are Hamas and Islamic Jihad fighters, despite offering no evidence to back up its claims. The Gaza government media office said that the Israeli army has threatened al-Shifa’s hospital’s staff and displaced civilians that the buildings they are staying in will be bombed in the event that they do not evacuate. The media office based its statement on testimonies from people who remain stranded inside the medical compound as Israel lays siege to it, asserting that those who have evacuated the buildings are either arrested, tortured, or killed, as reported by Middle East Eye. MEE also reported that six wounded patients in the hospital died amid the Israeli siege due to the lack of medical care, quoting the Gaza Ministry of Health as saying that “besieged medical teams and patients are appealing to UN institutions and the international community to intervene urgently to save their lives.” In southern Gaza, Israel continued its airstrikes on Rafah and Khan Younis, killing several civilians. In one airstrike on the north of the city of Rafah, five civilians were killed, four of them children, following the bombing of a two-story residential building in the Mirage area, reports Wafa. The number of casualties from Israeli airstrikes and shelling in the last 24 hours has risen to 72 people killed and 114 injured. Meanwhile, on Friday, the Israeli army released a statement on X saying that it had opened an investigation into the incident of the deliberate killing of four unarmed Palestinian men in civilian clothing in Khan Younis last February by an Israeli attack drone, the footage of which recently came to light after Al Jazeera obtained from sources in Gaza. The footage of the deliberate killing of the unarmed men made shockwaves, highlighting Israel’s deliberate policy of killing civilians. Gaza drone video shows killing of Palestinians in Israeli air attack | Al Jazeera Newsfeed ‘The unbearable cannot become the new normal’ In a statement on X, Philippe Lazzarini, head of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), said that food aid had been denied to northern Gaza for the second time in a week. “Today, the Israeli Authorities denied another UNRWA convoy with much needed food supplies from going to the north where people are on the verge of famine,” the UNRWA chief said. “The last time UNRWA was able to send food aid to the north was nearly 2 month [sic] ago.” Lazzarini went on to say that Israel the “man made hunger & looming famine” in Gaza could still be averted if Israel allowed “delivering food aid at scale to the north including via UNRWA, the largest humanitarian organisation in Gaza.” “Meanwhile, children will continue to die of malnutrition & dehydration under our watch,” he added. “The unbearable cannot become the new normal.” By late afternoon, Al Jazeera correspondents reported that Israeli shelling on Palestinian aid-seekers at the Kuwaiti roundabout had killed at least seven people. This latest attack on civilians at aid distribution points comes after the assassination of Faiq Mabhouh and Gaza’s civil employees, who were instrumental in organizing orderly deliveries of aid to Gaza without resulting in these Israeli attacks on starving Palestinians. The most infamous of such attacks was the “Flour Massacre” on March 3, which killed over 100 people. Meanwhile, 7,000 trucks carrying humanitarian aid and food aid are currently stationed outside the Rafah crossing, waiting to enter the besieged Gaza Strip. As reported by Al Jazeera, the governor of North Sinai, Muhammad Shousha, said that the Israeli inspection procedures are holding up the flow of trucks into Gaza. Shousha received UN General Secretary Antonio Guterres at al-Arish Airport in the Egyptian Sinai for the UN chief’s planned visit to the Rafah border crossing later today. During his press conference at the Rafah crossing, Guterres lambasted the blocking of aid to Gaza as a “moral outrage” and said that he had made his trip to the border to shed light on the pain of Palestinians in Gaza. New UN Security Council resolution postponed to Monday Following China and Russia’s vetoing of the U.S.-led draft resolution for a Gaza ceasefire at the UN Security Council, a new resolution demanding an “immediate ceasefire” during Ramadan in advance of a more “permanent sustainable ceasefire” has been postponed to Monday, March 25, according to diplomatic sources that spoke to AFP, as reported on Al Mayadeen. In the earlier U.S.-led draft, China and Russia used their veto against the resolution, with Russia citing it as a “hypocritical spectacle” that contained an “effective green light” for Israel to continue its invasion of Rafah, while China believed that the resolution “dodged the most central issue, that of a ceasefire” through the use of nebulous language.” The ambiguous language to which Russia and China referred was the resolution’s emphasis on the “imperative of an immediate and sustained ceasefire,” instead of demanding its implementation in the short term. The U.S. resolution also condemned the Hamas-led attacks on October 7. West Bank: resistance operation and record settlement expansion In the West Bank, Israeli settlement building has reached a record high. As reported by Middle East Eye, the United Nations and Israeli rights group Peace Now have asserted that in 2023, Israel expanded its settlements at a record pace in the occupied West Bank. According to Peace Now, ten out of the 26 illegal outposts established in the West Bank were built after October 7, resulting in the forcible displacement of 21 Palestinian communities (16 of which were uprooted since the outbreak of the war). Meanwhile, UN human rights chief Volker Turk asserted that the record expansion of settlements risks eliminating the chances for a Palestinian state, and that 24,300 new settlement housing units were built in 2023, a record high since the UN began monitoring in 2017. Yesterday, a Palestinian man from the village of Kufr Ni’ma, west of Ramallah, launched a shooting operation against Israeli soldiers, injuring seven soldiers before an Israeli attack helicopter fired missiles on his position in the hills, killing him. New details have emerged since the incident that shed light on the nature of the resistance operation and detail the expertise of the shooter, identified as Mujahid Mansour. According to reports by Ynet and Quds News Network, Mansour had opened fire on a settler bus, resulting in no fatalities, before retreating and being chased by Israeli army vehicles. It would seem that Mansour was leading the soldiers into an ambush, perching himself on top of a hill and hiding behind trees and bushes. Mansour then proceeded to intermittently engage the forces with a sniper rifle from a distance, resulting in a standoff that lasted for five hours due to the inability of Israeli drones and helicopters to identify him as a result of poor weather. Mansour was able to down an Israeli drone with his rifle during the standoff, while at other times, he fell silent and maintained his cover, while the Israeli troops were reluctant to advance. An Israeli helicopter eventually launched a missile where he was hiding when the weather cleared. Reports have since emerged that Mansour was a member of the Palestinian Authority (PA) security forces. In preparation for the punitive demolition of Mansour’s family home, the Israeli army took measurements for the house on Saturday, Wafa reported. This is part of Israel’s larger policy of punitive home demolitions, in which the Israeli army destroys the homes of the families of Palestinians who launched attacks against Israel, which has been described as a policy of collective punishment. BEFORE YOU GO – At Mondoweiss, we understand the power of telling Palestinian stories. For 17 years, we have pushed back when the mainstream media published lies or echoed politicians’ hateful rhetoric. Now, Palestinian voices are more important than ever. Our traffic has increased ten times since October 7, and we need your help to cover our increased expenses. Support our journalists with a donation today. https://mondoweiss.net/2024/03/operation-al-aqsa-flood-day-169-israel-kills-7-aid-seekers-in-northern-gaza-4-children-in-rafah-as-siege-of-al-shifa-hospital-enters-sixth-day/
    MONDOWEISS.NET
    ‘Operation Al-Aqsa Flood’ Day 169: Israel kills 7 aid-seekers in northern Gaza, 4 children in Rafah as siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day
    Israel continued its airstrikes on Rafah, killing four children, while in northern Gaza Israel turned back food aid for the second time in a week and killed at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers near the Kuwaiti roundabout.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2026 Views
  • Soccer legend Matt Le Tissier tells how he stopped the UK killing program in his sport. Where are the other athletes doing the same?
    Is NO ONE trying likewise to save his/her fellow players in football (American), baseball, basketball, tennis, rugby, golf, weightlifting....? (And what about the footballers outside the UK?)

    Mark Crispin Miller
    Here’s the tweet Le Tissier posted well over two years ago:


    Here he tells of his eventually successful effort to get the Professional Footballers Association to take action—which they did, although without announcing it!

    Click on the link, not the screenshot:

    https://rumble.com/v49rjh3-thank-you-to-the-brave-former-professional-soccer-player-danke-an-den-mutig.html


    https://rumble.com/v49rjh3-thank-you-to-the-brave-former-professional-soccer-player-danke-an-den-mutig.html

    Here is how the PFA identifies itself as terribly concerned about its members’ welfare:

    THE PLAYERS' UNION

    The Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) is the union for all current and former footballers and scholars in the Premier League, the FA Women’s Super League and the English Football Leagues.

    We are committed to helping you understand your purpose as both a player and a person. We provide the information, advice and support you need to help maximise the opportunities that come with playing professional football.

    We’re the only football organisation that solely prioritises players’ needs, and we offer a variety of educational, financial and wellbeing support services.

    Throughout our history, the PFA has been instrumental in supporting the women’s game, decreasing mental health stigma across the sport, leading the fight against racist abuse of players and pushing for research into the links between neurodegenerative conditions and playing football.

    We proudly amplify your voice as a player to ensure your views are properly represented to the game’s stakeholders and governing bodies. We also protect and enhance your rights and working conditions by holding stakeholders and governing bodies to account.

    Our team are passionate about helping footballers navigate personal or professional challenges, and we use our own experiences to relate to players and help prepare you for the future.

    We are here to protect and support you, for football and for life.

    https://www.thepfa.com/about-us

    Note the “woke” touch of that photo on the right:



    https://open.substack.com/pub/markcrispinmiller/p/soccer-legend-matt-le-tissier-tells?r=1tqe1i&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    Soccer legend Matt Le Tissier tells how he stopped the UK killing program in his sport. Where are the other athletes doing the same? Is NO ONE trying likewise to save his/her fellow players in football (American), baseball, basketball, tennis, rugby, golf, weightlifting....? (And what about the footballers outside the UK?) Mark Crispin Miller Here’s the tweet Le Tissier posted well over two years ago: Here he tells of his eventually successful effort to get the Professional Footballers Association to take action—which they did, although without announcing it! Click on the link, not the screenshot: https://rumble.com/v49rjh3-thank-you-to-the-brave-former-professional-soccer-player-danke-an-den-mutig.html https://rumble.com/v49rjh3-thank-you-to-the-brave-former-professional-soccer-player-danke-an-den-mutig.html Here is how the PFA identifies itself as terribly concerned about its members’ welfare: THE PLAYERS' UNION The Professional Footballers' Association (PFA) is the union for all current and former footballers and scholars in the Premier League, the FA Women’s Super League and the English Football Leagues. We are committed to helping you understand your purpose as both a player and a person. We provide the information, advice and support you need to help maximise the opportunities that come with playing professional football. We’re the only football organisation that solely prioritises players’ needs, and we offer a variety of educational, financial and wellbeing support services. Throughout our history, the PFA has been instrumental in supporting the women’s game, decreasing mental health stigma across the sport, leading the fight against racist abuse of players and pushing for research into the links between neurodegenerative conditions and playing football. We proudly amplify your voice as a player to ensure your views are properly represented to the game’s stakeholders and governing bodies. We also protect and enhance your rights and working conditions by holding stakeholders and governing bodies to account. Our team are passionate about helping footballers navigate personal or professional challenges, and we use our own experiences to relate to players and help prepare you for the future. We are here to protect and support you, for football and for life. https://www.thepfa.com/about-us Note the “woke” touch of that photo on the right: https://open.substack.com/pub/markcrispinmiller/p/soccer-legend-matt-le-tissier-tells?r=1tqe1i&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    OPEN.SUBSTACK.COM
    Soccer legend Matt Le Tissier tells how he stopped the UK killing program in his sport. Where are the other athletes doing the same?
    Is NO ONE trying likewise to save his/her fellow players in football (American), baseball, basketball, tennis, rugby, golf, weightlifting....? (And what about the footballers outside the UK?)
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 5851 Views
  • Twenty-six Things About the Islamic State (ISIS-ISIL-Daesh) That the U.S. Government Does Not Want You to Know About
    Michel Chossudovsky
    [This article was originally published by Global Research in November 2014.]

    Introductory Note

    In 2014 President Obama launched a “counterterrorism campaign” allegedly directed against the Islamic State (ISIS-Daesh). The operation consisted in providing a justification for the extensive bombing of Iraq and Syria, largely targeting residential areas and civilians.

    In turn, ISIS-Daesh was covertly supported and funded by the U.S. and its allies including Israel.

    Israel was directly involved in President Obama’s “counterterrorism” bombing raids directed against Syria, while also supporting Al Qaeda and ISIS mercenaries out of the Golan Heights.

    —Michel Chossudovsky, January 14, 2024


    Going after ” Islamic terrorists”, carrying out a worldwide pre-emptive war to “Protect the American Homeland” are used to justify a military agenda.

    The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is a creation of US intelligence. Washington’s “Counter-terrorism Agenda” in Iraq and Syria consists in Supporting the Terrorists.

    The incursion of the Islamic State (IS) brigades into Iraq starting in June 2014 was part of a carefully planned military-intelligence operation supported covertly by the US, NATO and Israel.

    The counter-terrorism mandate is a fiction. America is the Number One “State Sponsor of Terrorism.”

    The Islamic State is protected by the US and its allies. If they had wanted to eliminate the Islamic State brigades, they could have “carpet” bombed their convoys of Toyota pickup trucks when they crossed the desert from Syria into Iraq in June.

    The Syro-Arabian Desert is open territory (see map below). With state of the art jet fighter aircraft (F15, F22 Raptor, CF-18) it would have been — from a military standpoint — a rapid and expedient surgical operation.


    It could not have been undertaken without the unbending support of the Western media which has upheld Obama’s initiative as a counter-terrorism operation.

    Twenty Six Things

    A. The Historical Origins of Al Qaeda

    1. The US has supported Al Qaeda and its affiliated organizations for almost half a century since the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war.

    2. CIA training camps were set up in Pakistan. In the ten year period from 1982 to 1992, some 35,000 jihadists from 43 Islamic countries were recruited by the CIA to fight in the Afghan jihad.

    “Advertisements, paid for from CIA funds, were placed in newspapers and newsletters around the world offering inducements and motivations to join the Jihad.”

    3. Since the Reagan Administration, Washington has supported the Islamic terror network.

    Ronald Reagan called the terrorists “freedom fighters”. The US supplied weapons to the Islamic brigades. It was all for “a good cause”: fighting the Soviet Union and regime change, leading to the demise of a secular government in Afghanistan.


    Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives)
    4. Jihadist textbooks were published by the University of Nebraska. “The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings.”

    5. Osama bin Laden, America’s bogyman and founder of Al Qaeda was recruited by the CIA in 1979 at the very outset of the US sponsored jihadist war against Afghanistan. He was 22 years old and was trained in a CIA sponsored guerrilla training camp.

    Al Qaeda was not behind the 9/11 Attacks. September 11, 2001 provided a justification for waging a war against Afghanistan on the grounds that Afghanistan was a state sponsor of terrorism, supportive of Al Qaeda. The 9/11 attacks were instrumental in the formulation of the “Global War on Terrorism”.

    B. The Islamic State (ISIL)

    6. The Islamic State (ISIL) was originally an Al Qaeda affiliated entity created by US intelligence with the support of Britain’s MI6, Israel’s Mossad, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Presidency (GIP), Ri’āsat Al-Istikhbārāt Al-’Āmah ( رئاسة الاستخبارات العامة‎).

    7. The ISIL brigades were involved in the US-NATO supported insurgency in Syria directed against the government of Bashar al Assad.

    8. NATO and the Turkish High Command were responsible for the recruitment of ISIL and Al Nusrah mercenaries from the outset of the Syrian insurgency in March 2011. According to Israeli intelligence sources, this initiative consisted in:

    “a campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria. (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011.)

    9. There are Western Special Forces and Western intelligence operatives within the ranks of the ISIL. British Special Forces and MI6 have been involved in training jihadist rebels in Syria.

    10. Western military specialists on contract to the Pentagon have trained the terrorists in the use of chemical weapons.

    “The United States and some European allies are using defense contractors to train Syrian rebels on how to secure chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria, a senior U.S. official and several senior diplomats told CNN Sunday. (CNN Report, December 9, 2012)

    11. The ISIL’s practice of beheadings is part of the US-sponsored terrorist training programs implemented in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

    12. Recruited by America’s ally, a large number of ISIL mercenaries are convicted criminals released from Saudi prisons on condition they join the ISIL. Saudi death row inmates were recruited to join the terror brigades.

    13. Israel has supported the ISIL and Al Nusrah brigades out of the Golan Heights.

    Jihadist fighters have met Israeli IDF officers as well as Prime Minister Netanyahu. The IDF top brass tacitly acknowledges that “global jihad elements inside Syria” [ISIL and Al Nusrah] are supported by Israel. (See image below)

    “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Moshe Ya’alon next to a wounded mercenary, Israeli military field hospital at the occupied Golan Heights’ border with Syria, 18 February 2014″


    C. Syria and Iraq

    14. The ISIL are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. Their unspoken mandate is to wreck havoc and destruction in Syria and Iraq, acting on behalf of their US sponsors.

    15. US Senator John McCain has met up with jihadist terrorist leaders in Syria.

    16. The Islamic State (IS) militia, which is currently the alleged target of a US-NATO bombing campaign under a “counter-terrorism” mandate, continues to be supported covertly by the US. Washington and its allies continue to provide military aid to the Islamic State.

    17. US and allied bombings are not targeting the ISIL, they are bombing the economic infrastructure of Iraq and Syria including factories and oil refineries.

    18. The IS caliphate project is part of a longstanding US foreign policy agenda to carve up Iraq and Syria into separate territories: a Sunni Islamist Caliphate, an Arab Shia Republic, a Republic of Kurdistan.

    D. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT)

    19. “The Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT) is presented as a “Clash of Civilizations”, a war between competing values and religions, when in reality it is an outright war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives.

    20. U.S.-sponsored Al Qaeda terror brigades (covertly supported by Western intelligence) have been deployed in Mali, Niger, Nigeria, the Central African Republic, Somalia and Yemen.

    These various affiliated Al Qaeda entities in the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and Asia are CIA sponsored “intelligence assets”. They are used by Washington to wreck havoc, create internal conflicts and destabilize sovereign countries.

    21. Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabab in Somalia, the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) (supported by NATO in 2011), Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Jemaah Islamiah (JI) in Indonesia, among other Al Qaeda affiliated groups are supported covertly by Western intelligence.

    22. The US is also supporting Al Qaeda affiliated terrorist organizations in the Xinjiang Uighur autonomous region of China. The underlying objective is to trigger political instability in Western China.

    Chinese jihadists are reported to have received “terrorist training” from the Islamic State “in order to conduct attacks in China”. The declared objective of these Chinese-based jihadist entities (which serves the interests of the US) is to establish a Islamic caliphate extending into Western China. (Michel Chossudovsky, America’s War on Terrorism, Global Research, Montreal, 2005, Chapter 2).

    E. Homegrown Terrorists

    23. The Terrorists R Us: While the US is the unspoken architect of the Islamic State, Obama’s holy mandate is to protect America against ISIL attacks.

    24. The homegrown terrorist threat is a fabrication. It is promoted by Western governments and the media with a view to repealing civil liberties and installing a police state. The terror attacks by alleged jihadists and terror warnings are invariably staged events. They are used to create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation.

    In turn, the arrests, trials and sentences of “Islamic terrorists” sustain the legitimacy of America’s Homeland Security State and law enforcement apparatus, which has become increasingly militarized.

    The ultimate objective is to instill in the minds of millions of Americans that the enemy is real and the U.S. Administration will protect the lives of its citizens.

    25. The “counter-terrorism” campaign against the Islamic State has contributed to the demonization of Muslims, who in the eyes of Western public opinion are increasingly associated with the jihadists.

    26. Anybody who dares to question the validity of the “Global War on Terrorism” is branded a terrorist and subjected to the anti-terrorist laws.

    The ultimate objective of the “Global War on Terrorism” is to subdue the citizens, totally depoliticize social life in America, prevent people from thinking and conceptualizing, from analyzing facts and challenging the legitimacy of the inquisitorial social order which rules America.

    The Obama Administration has imposed a diabolical consensus with the support of its allies, not to mention the complicit role of the United Nations Security Council. The Western media has embraced the consensus; it has described the Islamic State as an independent entity, an outside enemy which threatens the Western World.

    The Big Lie has become the Truth.

    Say no to the Big Lie. Spread the message.

    The truth is ultimately a powerful weapon.

    [Read this article on Global Research.]

    https://open.substack.com/pub/michelchossudovsky/p/twenty-six-things-islamic-state?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    Twenty-six Things About the Islamic State (ISIS-ISIL-Daesh) That the U.S. Government Does Not Want You to Know About Michel Chossudovsky [This article was originally published by Global Research in November 2014.] Introductory Note In 2014 President Obama launched a “counterterrorism campaign” allegedly directed against the Islamic State (ISIS-Daesh). The operation consisted in providing a justification for the extensive bombing of Iraq and Syria, largely targeting residential areas and civilians. In turn, ISIS-Daesh was covertly supported and funded by the U.S. and its allies including Israel. Israel was directly involved in President Obama’s “counterterrorism” bombing raids directed against Syria, while also supporting Al Qaeda and ISIS mercenaries out of the Golan Heights. —Michel Chossudovsky, January 14, 2024 Going after ” Islamic terrorists”, carrying out a worldwide pre-emptive war to “Protect the American Homeland” are used to justify a military agenda. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is a creation of US intelligence. Washington’s “Counter-terrorism Agenda” in Iraq and Syria consists in Supporting the Terrorists. The incursion of the Islamic State (IS) brigades into Iraq starting in June 2014 was part of a carefully planned military-intelligence operation supported covertly by the US, NATO and Israel. The counter-terrorism mandate is a fiction. America is the Number One “State Sponsor of Terrorism.” The Islamic State is protected by the US and its allies. If they had wanted to eliminate the Islamic State brigades, they could have “carpet” bombed their convoys of Toyota pickup trucks when they crossed the desert from Syria into Iraq in June. The Syro-Arabian Desert is open territory (see map below). With state of the art jet fighter aircraft (F15, F22 Raptor, CF-18) it would have been — from a military standpoint — a rapid and expedient surgical operation. It could not have been undertaken without the unbending support of the Western media which has upheld Obama’s initiative as a counter-terrorism operation. Twenty Six Things A. The Historical Origins of Al Qaeda 1. The US has supported Al Qaeda and its affiliated organizations for almost half a century since the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war. 2. CIA training camps were set up in Pakistan. In the ten year period from 1982 to 1992, some 35,000 jihadists from 43 Islamic countries were recruited by the CIA to fight in the Afghan jihad. “Advertisements, paid for from CIA funds, were placed in newspapers and newsletters around the world offering inducements and motivations to join the Jihad.” 3. Since the Reagan Administration, Washington has supported the Islamic terror network. Ronald Reagan called the terrorists “freedom fighters”. The US supplied weapons to the Islamic brigades. It was all for “a good cause”: fighting the Soviet Union and regime change, leading to the demise of a secular government in Afghanistan. Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives) 4. Jihadist textbooks were published by the University of Nebraska. “The United States spent millions of dollars to supply Afghan schoolchildren with textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings.” 5. Osama bin Laden, America’s bogyman and founder of Al Qaeda was recruited by the CIA in 1979 at the very outset of the US sponsored jihadist war against Afghanistan. He was 22 years old and was trained in a CIA sponsored guerrilla training camp. Al Qaeda was not behind the 9/11 Attacks. September 11, 2001 provided a justification for waging a war against Afghanistan on the grounds that Afghanistan was a state sponsor of terrorism, supportive of Al Qaeda. The 9/11 attacks were instrumental in the formulation of the “Global War on Terrorism”. B. The Islamic State (ISIL) 6. The Islamic State (ISIL) was originally an Al Qaeda affiliated entity created by US intelligence with the support of Britain’s MI6, Israel’s Mossad, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Presidency (GIP), Ri’āsat Al-Istikhbārāt Al-’Āmah ( رئاسة الاستخبارات العامة‎). 7. The ISIL brigades were involved in the US-NATO supported insurgency in Syria directed against the government of Bashar al Assad. 8. NATO and the Turkish High Command were responsible for the recruitment of ISIL and Al Nusrah mercenaries from the outset of the Syrian insurgency in March 2011. According to Israeli intelligence sources, this initiative consisted in: “a campaign to enlist thousands of Muslim volunteers in Middle East countries and the Muslim world to fight alongside the Syrian rebels. The Turkish army would house these volunteers, train them and secure their passage into Syria. (DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011.) 9. There are Western Special Forces and Western intelligence operatives within the ranks of the ISIL. British Special Forces and MI6 have been involved in training jihadist rebels in Syria. 10. Western military specialists on contract to the Pentagon have trained the terrorists in the use of chemical weapons. “The United States and some European allies are using defense contractors to train Syrian rebels on how to secure chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria, a senior U.S. official and several senior diplomats told CNN Sunday. (CNN Report, December 9, 2012) 11. The ISIL’s practice of beheadings is part of the US-sponsored terrorist training programs implemented in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. 12. Recruited by America’s ally, a large number of ISIL mercenaries are convicted criminals released from Saudi prisons on condition they join the ISIL. Saudi death row inmates were recruited to join the terror brigades. 13. Israel has supported the ISIL and Al Nusrah brigades out of the Golan Heights. Jihadist fighters have met Israeli IDF officers as well as Prime Minister Netanyahu. The IDF top brass tacitly acknowledges that “global jihad elements inside Syria” [ISIL and Al Nusrah] are supported by Israel. (See image below) “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Moshe Ya’alon next to a wounded mercenary, Israeli military field hospital at the occupied Golan Heights’ border with Syria, 18 February 2014″ C. Syria and Iraq 14. The ISIL are the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance. Their unspoken mandate is to wreck havoc and destruction in Syria and Iraq, acting on behalf of their US sponsors. 15. US Senator John McCain has met up with jihadist terrorist leaders in Syria. 16. The Islamic State (IS) militia, which is currently the alleged target of a US-NATO bombing campaign under a “counter-terrorism” mandate, continues to be supported covertly by the US. Washington and its allies continue to provide military aid to the Islamic State. 17. US and allied bombings are not targeting the ISIL, they are bombing the economic infrastructure of Iraq and Syria including factories and oil refineries. 18. The IS caliphate project is part of a longstanding US foreign policy agenda to carve up Iraq and Syria into separate territories: a Sunni Islamist Caliphate, an Arab Shia Republic, a Republic of Kurdistan. D. The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) 19. “The Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT) is presented as a “Clash of Civilizations”, a war between competing values and religions, when in reality it is an outright war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives. 20. U.S.-sponsored Al Qaeda terror brigades (covertly supported by Western intelligence) have been deployed in Mali, Niger, Nigeria, the Central African Republic, Somalia and Yemen. These various affiliated Al Qaeda entities in the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa and Asia are CIA sponsored “intelligence assets”. They are used by Washington to wreck havoc, create internal conflicts and destabilize sovereign countries. 21. Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al Shabab in Somalia, the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) (supported by NATO in 2011), Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), Jemaah Islamiah (JI) in Indonesia, among other Al Qaeda affiliated groups are supported covertly by Western intelligence. 22. The US is also supporting Al Qaeda affiliated terrorist organizations in the Xinjiang Uighur autonomous region of China. The underlying objective is to trigger political instability in Western China. Chinese jihadists are reported to have received “terrorist training” from the Islamic State “in order to conduct attacks in China”. The declared objective of these Chinese-based jihadist entities (which serves the interests of the US) is to establish a Islamic caliphate extending into Western China. (Michel Chossudovsky, America’s War on Terrorism, Global Research, Montreal, 2005, Chapter 2). E. Homegrown Terrorists 23. The Terrorists R Us: While the US is the unspoken architect of the Islamic State, Obama’s holy mandate is to protect America against ISIL attacks. 24. The homegrown terrorist threat is a fabrication. It is promoted by Western governments and the media with a view to repealing civil liberties and installing a police state. The terror attacks by alleged jihadists and terror warnings are invariably staged events. They are used to create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation. In turn, the arrests, trials and sentences of “Islamic terrorists” sustain the legitimacy of America’s Homeland Security State and law enforcement apparatus, which has become increasingly militarized. The ultimate objective is to instill in the minds of millions of Americans that the enemy is real and the U.S. Administration will protect the lives of its citizens. 25. The “counter-terrorism” campaign against the Islamic State has contributed to the demonization of Muslims, who in the eyes of Western public opinion are increasingly associated with the jihadists. 26. Anybody who dares to question the validity of the “Global War on Terrorism” is branded a terrorist and subjected to the anti-terrorist laws. The ultimate objective of the “Global War on Terrorism” is to subdue the citizens, totally depoliticize social life in America, prevent people from thinking and conceptualizing, from analyzing facts and challenging the legitimacy of the inquisitorial social order which rules America. The Obama Administration has imposed a diabolical consensus with the support of its allies, not to mention the complicit role of the United Nations Security Council. The Western media has embraced the consensus; it has described the Islamic State as an independent entity, an outside enemy which threatens the Western World. The Big Lie has become the Truth. Say no to the Big Lie. Spread the message. The truth is ultimately a powerful weapon. [Read this article on Global Research.] https://open.substack.com/pub/michelchossudovsky/p/twenty-six-things-islamic-state?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    OPEN.SUBSTACK.COM
    Twenty-six Things About the Islamic State (ISIS-ISIL-Daesh) That the U.S. Government Does Not Want You to Know About
    In 2014 President Obama launched a “counterterrorism campaign” allegedly directed against the Islamic State (ISIS-Daesh). The operation consisted in providing a justification for the extensive bombing of Iraq and Syria, largely targeting residential areas and civilians.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 7815 Views
  • Dr. Chris Flowers Explains Report 89: What Did Pfizer Hide?
    January 3, 2024 • by UK Column


    As part of our ongoing series of interviews (of which this is the most recent) discussing the Pfizer Document Analysis (PDA) findings, UK Column is delighted to be able to welcome back Dr Chris Flowers MD FRCR FSBI, a retired academic cancer specialist and physician. He was previously an Associate Professor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), taught at the University of South Florida, and was a researcher at the Jonsson Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).

    Joining Debi Evans and Dr. Flowers is Cheryl Grainger, an independent pharmaceutical training consultant who has been coordinating the work between the DailyClout in the USA and UK Column, and who has also written for UK Column.

    Dr. Flowers, in view of his extensive background in testing and clinical trials, has been the medical lead on the Pfizer (and recently also Moderna) Document Analysis and has been instrumental in publishing 93 reports so far on DailyClout. 50 of these reports from last year are to be found in the Pfizer Document Analysis Report, which can be purchased on DailyClout

    As the Document Analysis investigations continue, UK Column catches up in this interview with the latest findings and the groundbreaking significance of Report 89: Pfizer Delayed Recording Vaccinated Deaths at Critical Juncture of EUA Process. Improper Delays in Reporting Deaths in the Vaccinated Led FDA to Mis-state Vaccine’s Effectiveness, Influenced EUA Grant Decision.

    Watch Full Interview





    Dr. Chris Flowers Explains Report 89: What Did Pfizer Hide?

    https://dailyclout.io/dr-chris-flowers-explains-report-89-what-did-pfizer-hide/
    Dr. Chris Flowers Explains Report 89: What Did Pfizer Hide? January 3, 2024 • by UK Column As part of our ongoing series of interviews (of which this is the most recent) discussing the Pfizer Document Analysis (PDA) findings, UK Column is delighted to be able to welcome back Dr Chris Flowers MD FRCR FSBI, a retired academic cancer specialist and physician. He was previously an Associate Professor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), taught at the University of South Florida, and was a researcher at the Jonsson Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Joining Debi Evans and Dr. Flowers is Cheryl Grainger, an independent pharmaceutical training consultant who has been coordinating the work between the DailyClout in the USA and UK Column, and who has also written for UK Column. Dr. Flowers, in view of his extensive background in testing and clinical trials, has been the medical lead on the Pfizer (and recently also Moderna) Document Analysis and has been instrumental in publishing 93 reports so far on DailyClout. 50 of these reports from last year are to be found in the Pfizer Document Analysis Report, which can be purchased on DailyClout As the Document Analysis investigations continue, UK Column catches up in this interview with the latest findings and the groundbreaking significance of Report 89: Pfizer Delayed Recording Vaccinated Deaths at Critical Juncture of EUA Process. Improper Delays in Reporting Deaths in the Vaccinated Led FDA to Mis-state Vaccine’s Effectiveness, Influenced EUA Grant Decision. Watch Full Interview Dr. Chris Flowers Explains Report 89: What Did Pfizer Hide? https://dailyclout.io/dr-chris-flowers-explains-report-89-what-did-pfizer-hide/
    DAILYCLOUT.IO
    Dr. Chris Flowers Explains Report 89: What Did Pfizer Hide?
    Pfizer Delayed Recording Vaccinated Deaths at Critical Juncture of EUA Process. Improper Delays in Reporting Deaths in the Vaccinated Led FDA
    1 Comments 0 Shares 3509 Views
  • RESEARCHERS CREATE AEROSOLIZED MRNA "VACCINE"

    Polymer nanoparticles deliver mRNA to the lung for mucosal vaccination
    Alexandra Suberi et al. Sci Transl Med. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37585505/
    .
    Injectable mRNA-based vaccines were instrumental in halting the spread of COVID-19 infections. Now researchers from Yale University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and elsewhere are looking into developing safe inhalable mechanisms for delivering vaccines and other kinds of therapies into the body. https://www.genengnews.com/topics/coronavirus/inhalable-polymer-based-nanoparticles-deliver-covid-19-vaccines-to-mice/
    .
    Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert
    Parker Crutchfield. Bioethics. 2019 Jan.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/
    .
    Operation Sea-Spray was a 1950 U.S. Navy secret biological warfare experiment in which Serratia marcescens and Bacillus globigii bacteria were sprayed over the San Francisco Bay Area in California, in order to determine how vulnerable a city like San Francisco may be to a bioweapon attack.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray#:~:text=Operation%20Sea%2DSpray%20was%20a,be%20to%20a%20bioweapon%20attack.

    https://rumble.com/v3fsrl0-researchers-create-aerosolized-mrna-vaccine.html
    RESEARCHERS CREATE AEROSOLIZED MRNA "VACCINE" Polymer nanoparticles deliver mRNA to the lung for mucosal vaccination Alexandra Suberi et al. Sci Transl Med. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37585505/ . Injectable mRNA-based vaccines were instrumental in halting the spread of COVID-19 infections. Now researchers from Yale University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and elsewhere are looking into developing safe inhalable mechanisms for delivering vaccines and other kinds of therapies into the body. https://www.genengnews.com/topics/coronavirus/inhalable-polymer-based-nanoparticles-deliver-covid-19-vaccines-to-mice/ . Compulsory moral bioenhancement should be covert Parker Crutchfield. Bioethics. 2019 Jan. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30157295/ . Operation Sea-Spray was a 1950 U.S. Navy secret biological warfare experiment in which Serratia marcescens and Bacillus globigii bacteria were sprayed over the San Francisco Bay Area in California, in order to determine how vulnerable a city like San Francisco may be to a bioweapon attack. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Sea-Spray#:~:text=Operation%20Sea%2DSpray%20was%20a,be%20to%20a%20bioweapon%20attack. https://rumble.com/v3fsrl0-researchers-create-aerosolized-mrna-vaccine.html
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 2526 Views
  • A Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran is Contemplated
    The U.S. led War on the People of Palestine and the Middle East is a Criminal Undertaking


    Introduction

    We stand in Solidarity with Palestine. But we must recognize that the United States Military and Intelligence apparatus is firmly behind Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine.

    .

    And this must be part of the solidarity campaign, namely to Reveal the Truth regarding Washington’s insidious role, which is part of a carefully planned military agenda directed against Palestine and the broader Middle East. Netanyahu is a proxy, with a criminal record. He has the unbending support of Western Europe’s “Classe politique”.

    .

    The U.S. led War on the People of Palestine and the Middle East is a Criminal Undertaking

    Israel and the Zionist lobby in the U.S. are NOT exerting undue influence AGAINST U.S. Foreign Policy as outlined by numerous analysts.

    Quite the opposite. The Zionist lobby is firmly aligned with U.S. foreign policy, and Vice Versa. It targets those who are opposed to war, who call for a cease fire. It exerts influence in favour of the conduct of the U.S. military agenda in support of Israel.



    The US military-intelligence establishment in coordination with powerful financial interests is calling the shots in regards to Israel’s genocidal intent to “Wipe Palestine off the Map”.

    .

    America’s Military Doctrine: Deliberately Targeting and Killing Civilians

    The targeting of civilians and the killing of children in Gaza is modelled on numerous US sponsored massacres of civilians (1945-2023) including the 2004 attack on Fallujah. (More than 30 Million mainly civilian deaths in US-led wars in what is euphemistically called the “post War Era”).
    .

    Veteran War correspondent Felicity Arbuthnot reflected on the indescribable barbarity of the 2004 Fallujah massacre, which resulted in countless deaths and destruction. It was a genocide conducted by the U.S military:
    .

    “The Americans invaded, chillingly: “house to house, room to room”, raining death and destruction on the proud, ancient “City of Mosques.”

    Marines killed so many civilians that the municipal soccer stadium had to be turned into a graveyard …

    One correspondent wrote: “There has been nothing like the attack on Fallujah since the Nazi invasion and occupation of much of the European continent – the shelling and bombing of Warsaw in September 1939, the terror bombing of Rotterdam in May 1940.”



    Fallujah, 2004

    .

    The U.S. is supportive of the Israeli genocide directed against the people of Palestine. Prime Minister Netanyahu is a criminal. He is Washington’s proxy, unreservedly endorsed and supported by the Biden Administration as well as the U.S. Congress.

    .

    Zionism constitutes the ideological underpinnings of contemporary U.S. imperialism and its unending war against the people of the Middle East.

    .

    The Zionist “Greater Israel” dogma –as in all wars of religion since the dawn of mankind– is there to mislead people Worldwide as to “who is really pulling the strings”.

    .

    Zionism has become a useful instrument which is embodied in U.S. military doctrine. The “Promised Land” broadly coincides with America’s hegemonic agenda in the Middle East, namely what the U.S. military has designated as the “New Middle East”.

    .

    Cui Bono: “To Whom Does it Benefit”

    There are strategic, geopolitical and economic objectives behind Israel’s genocide directed against the people of Palestine. “Crimes are often committed to benefit their perpetrators”: Israel’s War against the People of Palestine serves the interests of Big Money, the Military Industrial Complex, Corrupt Politicians…

    The Genocide is implemented by Netanyahu on behalf of the United States.

    The US military and intelligence apparatus are behind Israel’s criminal bombing and invasion of Gaza. The unfolding Middle East War is largely directed against Iran.

    .

    .

    Iran and the Nuclear Issue

    Historical Antecedents. Using Israel As a Means to Attacking Iran

    In 2003, the war on Iran project (Operation Theatre Iran Near Term, TIRANNT)) was already Déjà Vu. It had been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 15 years.

    Let us recall that at the outset of Bush’s Second Term, Vice President Dick Cheney dropped a bombshell, hinting, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the rogue enemies of America. And that Israel would, so to speak,

    “be doing the bombing for us” [paraphrase] , without US military involvement and without us putting pressure on them “to do it”. For further details see my article below was first published by Global Research in May 2005, as well as PBS Interview with Z. Brzezinski

    This Dick Cheney-style option is currently (November 2023) once more on the drawing board of the Pentagon, namely the possibility that Israel which is already bombing Lebanon and Syria, would be incited to wage an attack on Iran (acting on behalf of the United States).

    US Congress Resolution (H. RES. 559) Accuses Iran of Possessing Nuclear Weapons

    Careful timing: In June 2023, the US House of Representatives adopted Resolution (H. RES. 559) which provides a “Green Light” to wage war on Iran.

    The US House passed a resolution that allows the use of force against Iran, intimating without a shred of evidence that Iran has Nuclear Weapons:

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives declares it is the policy of the United States—

    (1) that a nuclear Islamic Republic of Iran is not acceptable;

    (2) that Iran must not be able to obtain a nuclear weapon under any circumstances or conditions;

    (3) to use all means necessary to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon; and

    (4) to recognize and support the freedom of action of partners and allies, including Israel, to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

    Click below to access the complete text of H. RES 559



    Israel’s Undeclared Nuclear Weapons Arsenal

    Whereas Iran is tagged (without evidence) as a Nuclear Power by the U.S. House of Representatives, Washington fails to acknowledge that Israel is an undeclared nuclear power.

    In recent developments, Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu, “admitted to the world that Israel has nuclear weapons ready to be used against Palestinians”

    The Times of Israel reported that: “Amichai Eliyahu said Sunday [November 5, 2023] that one of Israel’s options in the war against Hamas was to drop a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip”

    Video on Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Facility

    English subtitles



    .

    .

    The War on Energy

    Unspoken Objective of a US-NATO-Israel War against Iran: Natural Gas

    Reserves of Natural Gas: Iran ranks Second after Russia. Russia, Iran and Qatar possess 54.1 percent of the World’s reserves of natural gas.

    -Russia 24.3%,

    -Iran 17.3%,

    -Qatar, 12.5 % (in partnership with Iran)

    versus

    -5.3 % for the US

    President Joe Biden ordered to “blow up” (September 2022) the Nordstream Pipeline, which constitutes a U.S. Act of War against the European Union.

    In the words of Joe Biden:

    “There will be no longer a Nord Stream 2”. Statement at White House Press Conference (February 7, 2022)

    America’s strategic objective was, despite its meagre reserves of natural gas:

    To Force the European Union to buy LNG “Made in America”.

    What this implies is that America’s military agenda against Russia and Iran constitutes a means to hike up EU energy prices, which is an act economic warfare against the People of Europe.






    The Iran-Qatar Natural Gas Partnership

    The maritime gas reserves of the Persian Gulf are under a (joint ownership) partnership between Qatar and Iran (See diagram below).





    The Biden Administration is Intent upon Destabilizing the Iran-Qatar Partnership

    This partnership is supportive of the People of Palestine.

    In March 2022, “President Joe Biden following a meeting with Qatar’s Emir Sheik Tamim “designated Qatar as a major non-NATO ally of the United States, fulfilling the promise that he had made to Qatar earlier this year [2022], the White House said” Reuters



    “The designation is granted by the United States to close, non-NATO allies that have strategic working relationships with the U.S. military.

    Biden promised Qatar’s emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, in January [2022] during a meeting at the White House that he would grant Qatar the special status.” Reuters See also followup Reuters article.

    What is at stake are cross-cutting coalitions. Qatar is a “Partner” of Iran in relation to the strategic reserves of maritime gas in the Persian Gulf. There is no formaI military cooperation between the two countries.

    Washington’s unspoken agenda is to break and/or destabilize Qatar’s Partnership with Iran, by integrating Qatar into the US-NATO military orbit.

    It is worth noting that a few days prior to the October 7, 2023 Hamas operation, the Emir of Qatar Sheik Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani “laid the foundation stone for the Northern Dome expansion project” in Iran’s Pars South Field (See map above).

    “the Emir of Qatar said the groundbreaking for the Northern Dome expansion project was laid today, which is in line with Qatar’s strategy to strengthen its position as a global LNG producer …

    This joint gas field, known as “South Pars” in Iran, is the largest natural gas field in the world and contains 50.97 trillion cubic meters of gas and about 7.9 billion cubic meters of natural gas condensate.

    At the time of writing, the implications of Qatar’s “Special Status” Military Alliance with the U.S. remain unclear.

    America’s Al-Udeid military base in Qatar (left) is the largest US base in the Middle East.

    Have the status and functions of Al Udeid changed since the signing of the March 2022 agreement designating Qatar as a “Major Non NATO Ally of the US”

    Qatar is both A Partner of Iran as well as a Major Non NATO Ally of the U.S. Reports confirm the development of a close relationship between the commanders of the US Air Force and the Qatari Emiri Air Force.

    Qatar is a “Powder Keg”?

    The U.S. foreign policy objective is to ultimately destroy and undermine that “friendship” with Iran which is highly valued and supported by Qatari citizens.

    The export of gas from South Pars North Dome transits through Iran, Turkey and Russia.

    Qatar, Russia and Iran (the 3 largest holders Worldwide of natural gas reserves) reached an agreement in 2009 to create a ‘Gas Troika’, a trilateral gas cooperation entity including the development of joint projects.

    A large number of countries including South Korea, India, Japan, China are importing LNG from Qatar.

    Last year (November 2022), “QatarEnergy signed a 27-year deal to supply China’s Sinopec with liquefied natural gas”. Qatar has also a strategic alliance with China.

    Washington’s objective under the disguise of America’s “Major Non-NATO Alliance” with Qatar is to:

    Break the Qatar-Iran Partnership
    Exclude Iran from the Joint Maritime Gas Field
    Exert US Control over the Maritime Gas Field in the Persian Gulf
    Weaken and Disable the “Gas Troika” (Russia, Iran, Qatar)
    Create Chaos in the Global Energy Market,
    Undermine the Trade in Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) to Numerous Countries
    .

    Iran. Third Largest Reserves of Oil Worldwide

    Iran is not only second in terms of its gas reserves after Russia, it ranks third Worldwide in relation to its oil reserves (12% of Worldwide oil reserves) versus a meagre 4% for the U.S.








    The Ben Gurion Canal Project

    .

    U.S. Seeks Dominance over Strategic International Waterways

    The Ben Gurion Canal Project was initially a “secret” (classified) U.S. project formulated in 1963 by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNG, a strategic think tank (focussing on nuclear radiation) on contract with the U.S Department of Energy. The LLNG project was formulated in response to the nationalization of the Suez Canal in July 1956 by President Gamal Abdel Nasser (1956-1970). Its intent was to bypass the Suez Canal.

    The Ben Gurion Canal project is currently contemplated as means control the channels of international maritime trade to the detriment of the people of the Middle East. It also seeks to destabilize China’s maritime commodity trade.



    In the context of the broader US-led Middle East War, the Ben Gurion Canal Project is part of America’s hegemonic military agenda. It is consistent with Netanyahu’s “Plan to Wipe Palestine Off the Map”.

    According to Yvonne Ridley:

    “The only thing stopping the newly-revised [Ben Gurion Canal] project from being revived and rubber-stamped is the presence of the Palestinians in Gaza. As far as Netanyahu is concerned they are standing in the way of the project” (Yvonne Ridley, November 10, 2023, emphasis added)

    The U.S led war is intent upon confiscating all Palestinian territories, which would be appropriated by the State of Israel, acting as a strategic “Anglo-American Hub” in the Middle East:

    The Ben Gurion Canal will give Israel in particular and other friendly nations the freedom from blackmail arising out of access to the Suez Canal.

    Arab states have been leveraging the Red Sea to pressure Israel and in response, Israel has decided to gain more control of the Red Sea. These African countries have cultural and economic affinities with the Arab states. One of the main military benefits for Israel is that it gives Israel the strategic options as the Ben Gurion Canal will totally take away the importance of Suez for the US military if needed in the aid for Israel.

    Israel aims to push Egypt further into a corner by eliminating Suez in the global trade and energy corridor and becoming a global trade and energy logistics center.

    Experts are of the opinion that this situation will shake the strategic-energy balance of China’s Belt and Road Project initiative in the Mediterranean, along with the Strait of Hormuz, which is the transfer point of 30 percent of the world’s energy. The Ben Gurion Canal would have the solid backing of the West. (Eurasia Review, November 7, 2023, emphasis added)

    .

    “Greater Israel”.

    Strategic “Anglo-American Hub”

    The Promised Land of Greater Israel coincides with America’s Colonial Design in the Middle East

    The Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy, its strategic objective is to extend US hegemony as well as fracture and balkanize the Middle East.

    In this regard, Washington’s strategy consists in destabilizing and weakening regional economic powers in the Middle East including Turkey and Iran. This policy –which is consistent with the Greater Israel– is accompanied by a process of political fragmentation.



    Since the Gulf war (1991), the Pentagon has contemplated the creation of a “Free Kurdistan” which would include the annexation of parts of Iraq, Syria and Iran as well as Turkey



    “The New Middle East”: Unofficial US Military Academy Map by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters

    .

    “America’s Promised Land”. Global Warfare

    When viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist Plan for the Middle East coincides with America’s long war against the Middle East. As we mentioned earlier the Zionist agenda provides an ideological and religious justification of America’s long war against the Middle East.

    The 1979-80. the so-called Soviet Afghan War, engineered by the CIA
    The 1980-88 Iraq-Iran War engineered by the U.S.
    The 1991 Gulf War against Iraq,
    The 2001 The US-NATO Invasion of Afghanistan,
    The 2003 Invasion of Iraq
    The 2006 War on Lebanon,
    The Arab Spring,
    The 2011 war on Libya,
    The 2015 war on Yemen
    Obama’s 2014-2017 “Counter-Terrorism” Operation against Iraq and Syria
    The ongoing wars against Syria, Iraq and Yemen
    The “Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist project, with the support of NATO.

    Needless to day, the ideological and religious underpinnings of the “Greater Israel” project are consistent with America’s imperial design.

    While the Zionist agenda is not the driving force, it serves the useful purpose of misleading public opinion concerning America’s long war against the people of the Middle East.

    The Historical Context: A Sequence of Military Plans and Scenarios to Wage War on Iran

    Since the launching of the Theater Iran Near Term (TIRANNT) war games scenario in May 2003 (leaked classified doc), an escalation scenario involving military action directed against Iran and Syria had been envisaged, of which Syria was the first stage.

    TIRANNT was followed by a series of military plans pertaining to Iran. Numerous post 9/11 official statements and US military documents had pointed to an expanded Middle East war, involving the active participation of Israel.

    Israel is America’s ally. Military operations are closely coordinated. Israel does not act without Washington’s approval.

    U.S.-Israeli Air Defense

    Barely acknowledged by the media, the US and Israel have an integrated air defense system, which was set up in early 2009, shortly after the Israel invasion of Gaza under “Operation Cast Led”.

    The X-band radar air defense system set up by the US in Israel in 2009 would

    “integrate Israel’s missile defenses with the U.S. global missile detection network, which includes satellites, Aegis ships on the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Red Sea, and land-based Patriot radars and interceptors.” (Sen. Joseph Azzolina, Protecting Israel from Iran’s missiles, Bayshore News, December 26, 2008). )

    What this means is that Washington calls the shots. Confirmed by the Pentagon, the US military controls Israel’s Air Defense:

    ”This is and will remain a U.S. radar system,’ Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said.

    ‘So this is not something we are giving or selling to the Israelis and it is something that will likely require U.S. personnel on-site to operate.’” (Quoted in Israel National News, January 9, 2009, emphasis added).

    At the outset of Obama’s Second Term, the US and Israel initiated discussions pertaining to a “US personnel on site” presence in Israel, namely the establishment of a “permanent” and “official” military base inside Israel.

    And on September 17, 2017, a US Air Defense base located in the Negev desert was inaugurated.

    According to the Israeli IDF spokesperson, the objective is to send a “message to the region, ” including Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Palestine.

    Of utmost relevance:

    Israel would not be able to act unilaterally against Iran, without a green light from the Pentagon which controls key components of Israel’s air defense system.

    In practice, a war on Iran, would be a joint US-NATO-Israeli endeavor, coordinated by US Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with America’s allies playing a key (subordinate) role.

    Michel Chossudovsky, October 31, 2017, November 11, 2023

    Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran

    by

    Michel Chossudovsky

    May 2005

    At the outset of Bush’s second term, Vice President Dick Cheney dropped a bombshell. He hinted, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the rogue enemies of America, and that Israel would, so to speak, “be doing the bombing for us”, without US military involvement and without us putting pressure on them “to do it”:

    “One of the concerns people have is that Israel might do it without being asked… Given the fact that Iran has a stated policy that their objective is the destruction of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards,” (quoted from an MSNBC Interview Jan 2005)

    Israel is a Rottweiler on a leash: The US wants to “set Israel loose” to attack Iran. Commenting the Vice President’s assertion, former National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in an interview on PBS, confirmed with some apprehension, yes: Cheney wants Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to act on America’s behalf and “do it” for us:

    “Iran I think is more ambiguous. And there the issue is certainly not tyranny; it’s nuclear weapons. And the vice president today in a kind of a strange parallel statement to this declaration of freedom hinted that the Israelis may do it and in fact used language which sounds like a justification or even an encouragement for the Israelis to do it.”

    The foregoing statements are misleading. The US is not “encouraging Israel”. What we are dealing with is a joint US-Israeli military operation to bomb Iran, which has been in the active planning stage for more than a year. The Neocons in the Defense Department, under Douglas Feith, have been working assiduously with their Israeli military and intelligence counterparts, carefully identifying targets inside Iran (see Seymour Hersh)

    Under this working arrangement, Israel will not act unilaterally, without a green light from Washington. In other words, Israel will not implement an attack without the participation of the US.

    Covert Intelligence Operations: Stirring Ethnic Tensions in Iran

    Meanwhile, for the last two years, Washington has been involved in covert intelligence operations inside Iran. American and British intelligence and special forces (working with their Israeli counterparts) are involved in this operation.

    “A British intelligence official said that any campaign against Iran would not be a ground war like the one in Iraq. The Americans will use different tactics, said the intelligence officer. ‘It is getting quite scary.'” (Evening Standard, 17 June 2003)

    The expectation is that a US-Israeli bombing raid of Iran’s nuclear facilities will stir up ethnic tensions and trigger “regime change” in favor of the US. (See Arab Monitor).

    Bush advisers believe that the “Iranian opposition movement” will unseat the Mullahs. This assessment constitutes a gross misjudgment of social forces inside Iran. What is more likely to occur is that Iranians will consistently rally behind a wartime government against foreign aggression. In fact, the entire Middle East and beyond would rise up against US interventionism.

    Retaliation in the Case of a US-Israeli Aerial Attack

    Tehran has confirmed that it will retaliate if attacked, in the form of ballistic missile strikes directed against Israel (CNN, 8 Feb 2005). These attacks, could also target US military facilities in the Persian Gulf, which would immediately lead us into a scenario of military escalation and all out war.

    In other words, the air strikes against Iran could contribute to unleashing a war in the broader Middle East Central Asian region.

    Moreover, the planned attack on Iran should also be understood in relation to the timely withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon, which has opened up a new space, for the deployment of Israeli forces. The participation of Turkey in the US-Israeli military operation is also a factor, following an agreement reached between Ankara and Tel Aviv.

    In other words, US and Israeli military planners must carefully weigh the far-reaching implications of their actions.

    Israel Builds up its Stockpile of Deadly Military Hardware

    A massive buildup in military hardware has occurred in preparation for a possible attack on Iran.

    Israel has recently taken delivery from the US of some 5,000 “smart air launched weapons” including some 500 BLU 109 ‘bunker-buster bombs. The (uranium coated) munitions are said to be more than “adequate to address the full range of Iranian targets, with the possible exception of the buried facility at Natanz, which may require the [more powerful] BLU-113 bunker buster“:

    “Given Israel’s already substantial holdings of such weapons, this increase in its inventory would allow a sustained assault with or without further US involvement.” (See Richard Bennett)

    Gbu 28 Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28)

    The Israeli Air Force would attack Iran’s nuclear facility at Bushehr using US as well Israeli produced bunker buster bombs. The attack would be carried out in three separate waves “with the radar and communications jamming protection being provided by U.S. Air Force AWACS and other U.S. aircraft in the area”. (See W Madsen)

    Bear in mind that the bunker buster bombs can also be used to deliver tactical nuclear bombs. The B61-11 is the “nuclear version” of the “conventional” BLU 113. It can be delivered in much same way as the conventional bunker buster bomb. (See Michel Chossudovsky, see also this)

    According to the Pentagon, tactical nuclear weapons are “safe for civilians”. Their use has been authorized by the US Senate. (See Michel Chossudovsky)

    Moreover, reported in late 2003, Israeli Dolphin-class submarines equipped with US Harpoon missiles armed with nuclear warheads are now aimed at Iran. (See Gordon Thomas)

    Even if tactical nuclear weapons are not used by Israel, an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities not only raises the specter of a broader war, but also of nuclear radiation over a wide area:

    “To attack Iran’s nuclear facilities will not only provoke war, but it could also unleash clouds of radiation far beyond the targets and the borders of Iran.” (Statement of Prof Elias Tuma, Arab Internet Network, Federal News Service, 1 March 2005)

    Moreover, while most reports have centered on the issue of punitive air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, the strikes would most probably extend to other targets.

    While a ground war is contemplated as a possible “scenario” at the level of military planning, the US military would not be able to wage a an effective ground war, given the situation in Iraq. In the words of former National Security Adviser Lawrence Eagelberger:

    “We are not going to get in a ground war in Iran, I hope. If we get into that, we are in serious trouble. I don’t think anyone in Washington is seriously considering that.” ( quoted in the National Journal, 4 December 2004).

    Iran’s Military Capabilities

    Despite its overall weaknesses in relation to Israel and the US, Iran has an advanced air defense system, deployed to protect its nuclear sites; “they are dispersed and underground making potential air strikes difficult and without any guarantees of success.” (Jerusalem Post, 20 April 2005).

    It has upgraded its Shahab-3 missile, which can reach targets in Israel. Iran’s armed forces have recently conducted high-profile military exercises in anticipation of a US led attack. Iran also possesses some 12 X-55 strategic cruise missiles, produced by Ukraine. Iran’s air defense systems is said to feature Russian SA-2, SA-5, SA-6 as well as shoulder-launched SA-7 missiles (Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies).

    The US “Military Road Map”

    The Bush administration has officially identified Iran and Syria as the next stage of “the road map to war”.

    Targeting Iran is a bipartisan project, which broadly serves the interests of the Anglo-American oil conglomerates, the Wall Street financial establishment and the military-industrial complex.

    The broader Middle East-Central Asian region encompasses more than 70% of the World’s reserves of oil and natural gas. Iran possesses 10% of the world’s oil and ranks third after Saudi Arabia (25 %) and Iraq (11 %) in the size of its reserves. In comparison, the US possesses less than 2.8 % of global oil reserves. (See Eric Waddell, The Battle for Oil)

    The announcement to target Iran should come as no surprise. It is part of the battle for oil. Already during the Clinton administration, US Central Command (USCENTCOM) had formulated “in war theater plans” to invade both Iraq and Iran:

    “The broad national security interests and objectives expressed in the President’s National Security Strategy (NSS) and the Chairman’s National Military Strategy (NMS) form the foundation of the United States Central Command’s theater strategy. The NSS directs implementation of a strategy of dual containment of the rogue states of Iraq and Iran as long as those states pose a threat to U.S. interests, to other states in the region, and to their own citizens. Dual containment is designed to maintain the balance of power in the region without depending on either Iraq or Iran. USCENTCOM’s theater strategy is interest-based and threat-focused. The purpose of U.S. engagement, as espoused in the NSS, is to protect the United States’ vital interest in the region – uninterrupted, secure U.S./Allied access to Gulf oil. (USCENTCOM, USPolicy , emphasis added)

    Main Military Actors

    While the US, Israel, as well as Turkey (with borders with both Iran and Syria) are the main actors in this process, a number of other countries, in the region, allies of the US, including several Central Asian former Soviet republics have been enlisted. Britain is closely involved despite its official denials at the diplomatic level. Turkey occupies a central role in the Iran operation. It has an extensive military cooperation agreement with Israel. There are indications that NATO is also formally involved in the context of an Israel-NATO agreement reached in November 2004.

    Planning The Aerial Attack on Iran

    According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter, George W. Bush has already signed off on orders for an aerial attack on Iran, scheduled for June.(See this)

    The June cut-off date should be understood. It does not signify that the attack will occur in June. What it suggests is that the US and Israel are “in a state of readiness” and are prepared to launch an attack by June or at a later date. In other words, the decision to launch the attack has not been made.

    Ritter’s observation concerning an impending military operation should nonetheless be taken seriously. In recent months, there is ample evidence that a major military operation is in preparation:

    1) several high profile military exercises have been conducted in recent months, involving military deployment and the testing of weapons systems.

    2) military planning meetings have been held between the various parties involved. There has been a shuttle of military and government officials between Washington, Tel Aviv and Ankara.

    3) A significant change in the military command structure in Israel has occurred, with the appointment of a new Chief of Staff.

    4) Intense diplomatic exchanges have been carried out at the international level with a view to securing areas of military cooperation and/or support for a US-Israeli led military operation directed against Iran.

    5) Ongoing intelligence operations inside Iran have been stepped up.

    6) Consensus Building: Media propaganda on the need to intervene in Iran has been stepped up, with daily reports on how Iran constitutes a threat to peace and global security.

    Timeline of Key Initiatives

    In the last few months, various key initiatives have been taken, which are broadly indicative that an aerial bombing of Iran is in the military pipeline:

    November 2004 in Brussels: NATO-Israel protocol: Israel’s IDF delegation to the NATO conference to met with military brass of six members of the Mediterranean basin nations, including Egypt, Jordan, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria and Mauritania. NATO seeks to revive the framework, known as the Mediterranean Dialogue program, which would include Israel. The Israeli delegation accepted to participate in military exercises and “anti-terror maneuvers” together with several Arab countries.

    January 2005: the US, Israel and Turkey held military exercises in the Eastern Mediterranean, off the coast of Syria. These exercises, which have been held in previous years were described as routine.

    February 2005. Following the decision reached in Brussels in November 2004, Israel was involved for the first time in military exercises with NATO, which also included several Arab countries.

    February 2005: Assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The assassination, which was blamed on Syria, serves Israeli and US interests and was used as a pretext to demand the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon.

    February 2005: Sharon fires his Chief-of-Staff, Moshe Ya’alon and appoints Air Force General Dan Halutz. This is the first time in Israeli history that an Air Force General is appointed Chief of Staff (See Uri Avnery)

    The appointment of Major General Dan Halutz as IDF Chief of Staff is considered in Israeli political circles as “the appointment of the right man at the right time.” The central issue is that a major aerial operation against Iran is in the planning stage, and Maj General Halutz is slated to coordinate the aerial bombing raids on Iran. Halutz’s appointment was specifically linked to Israel’s Iran agenda: “As chief of staff, he will in the best position to prepare the military for such a scenario.”

    March 2005: NATO’s Secretary General was in Jerusalem for follow-up talks with Ariel Sharon and Israel’s military brass, following the joint NATO-Israel military exercise in February. These military cooperation ties are viewed by the Israeli military as a means to “enhance Israel’s deterrence capability regarding potential enemies threatening it, mainly Iran and Syria.” The premise underlying NATO-Israel military cooperation is that Israel is under attack:

    “The more Israel’s image is strengthened as a country facing enemies who attempt to attack it for no justified reason, the greater will be the possibility that aid will be extended to Israel by NATO. Furthermore, Iran and Syria will have to take into account the possibility that the increasing cooperation between Israel and NATO will strengthen Israel’s links with Turkey, also a member of NATO. Given Turkey’s impressive military potential and its geographic proximity to both Iran and Syria, Israel’s operational options against them, if and when it sees the need, could gain considerable strength. ” (Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies, http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/sa/v7n4p4Shalom.html )

    The Israel-NATO protocol is all the more important because it obligates NATO to align itself with the US-Israeli plan to bomb Iran, as an act of self defense on the part of Israel. It also means that NATO is also involved in the process of military consultations relating to the planned aerial bombing of Iran. It is of course related to the bilateral military cooperation agreement between Israel and Turkey and the likelihood that part of the military operation will be launched from Turkey, which is a member of NATO.

    Late March 2005: News leaks in Israel indicated an “initial authorization” by Prime Minster Ariel Sharon of an Israeli attack on Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment plant “if diplomacy failed to stop Iran’s nuclear program”. (The Hindu, 28 March 2005)

    March-April 2005: The Holding in Israel of Joint US-Israeli military exercises specifically pertaining to the launching of Patriot missiles.

    US Patriot missile crews stationed in Germany were sent to Israel to participate in the joint Juniper Cobra exercise with the Israeli military. The exercise was described as routine and “unconnected to events in the Middle East”: “As always, we are interested in implementing lessons learned from training exercises.” (UPI, 9 March 2005).

    April 2005: Donald Rumsfeld (right) was on an official visits to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan. His diplomatic endeavors were described by the Russian media as “literally circling Iran in an attempt to find the best bridgehead for a possible military operation against that country.”

    In Baku, Azerbaijan Rumsfeld was busy discussing the date for deployment of US troops in Azerbaijan on Iran’s North-Western border. US military bases described as “mobile groups” in Azerbaijan are slated to play a role in a military operation directed against Iran.

    Azerbaijan is a member of GUUAM, a military cooperation agreement with the US and NATO, which allows for the stationing of US troops in several of the member countries, including Georgia, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. The stated short term objective is to “neutralize Iran”. The longer term objective under the Pentagon’s “Caspian Plan” is to exert military and economic control over the entire Caspian sea basin, with a view to ensuring US authority over oil reserves and pipeline corridors.

    During his visit in April, Rumsfeld was pushing the US initiative of establishing “American special task forces and military bases to secure US influence in the Caspian region:

    “Called Caspian Watch, the project stipulates a network of special task forces and police units in the countries of the regions to be used in emergencies including threats to objects of the oil complex and pipelines. Project Caspian Watch will be financed by the United States ($100 million). It will become an advance guard of the US European Command whose zone of responsibility includes the Caspian region. Command center of the project with a powerful radar is to be located in Baku.” ( Defense and Security Russia, April 27, 2005)

    Rumsfeld’s visit followed shortly after that of Iranian President Mohammad Khatami’s to Baku.

    April 2005: Iran signs a military cooperation with Tajikistan, which occupies a strategic position bordering Afghanistan’s Northern frontier. Tajikistan is a member of “The Shanghai Five” military cooperation group, which also includes Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia. Iran also has economic cooperation agreements with Turkmenistan.

    Mid April 2005: Israel Prime Minister Ariel Sharon meets George W Bush at his Texas Ranch. Iran is on the agenda of bilateral talks. More significantly, the visit of Ariel Sharon was used to carry out high level talks between US and Israeli military planners pertaining to Iran.

    Late April 2005. President Vladmir Putin is in Israel on an official visit. He announces Russia’s decision to sell short-range anti-aircraft missiles to Syria and to continue supporting Iran’s nuclear industry. Beneath the gilded surface of international diplomacy, Putin’s timely visit to Israel must be interpreted as “a signal to Israel” regarding its planned aerial attack on Iran.

    Late April 2005: US pressure in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been exerted with a view to blocking the re-appointment of Mohammed Al Baradei, who according to US officials “is not being tough enough on Iran…” Following US pressures, the vote on the appointment of a new IAEA chief was put off until June. These developments suggest that Washington wants to put forth their own hand-picked nominee prior to launching US-Israeli aerial attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities. (See VOA). (In February 2003, Al Baradei along with UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix challenged the (phony) intelligence on WMD presented by the US to the UN Security Council, with a view to justifying the war on Iraq.)

    Late April 2005. Sale of deadly military hardware to Israel. GBU-28 Buster Bunker Bombs: Coinciding with Putin’s visit to Israel, the US Defence Security Cooperation Agency (Department of Defense) announced the sale of an additional 100 bunker-buster bombs produced by Lockheed Martin to Israel. This decision was viewed by the US media as “a warning to Iran about its nuclear ambitions.”

    The sale pertains to the larger and more sophisticated “Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28) BLU-113 Penetrator” (including the WGU-36A/B guidance control unit and support equipment). The GBU-28 is described as “a special weapon for penetrating hardened command centers located deep underground. The fact of the matter is that the GBU-28 is among the World’s most deadly “conventional” weapons used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, capable of causing thousands of civilian deaths through massive explosions.

    The Israeli Air Force are slated to use the GBU-28s on their F-15 aircraft. (See text of DSCA news release)

    Late April 2005- early May: Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right) in Israel for follow-up talks with Ariel Sharon. He was accompanied by his Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul, who met with senior Israeli military officials. On the official agenda of these talks: joint defense projects, including the joint production of Arrow II Theater Missile Defense and Popeye II missiles. The latter also known as the Have Lite, are advanced small missiles, designed for deployment on fighter planes. Tel Aviv and Ankara decide to establish a hotline to share intelligence.

    May 2005: Syrian troops scheduled to withdraw from Lebanon, leading to a major shift in the Middle East security situation, in favor of Israel and the US.

    Iran Surrounded

    The US has troops and military bases in Turkey, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, and of course Iraq.

    In other words, Iran is virtually surrounded by US military bases. (see Map below). These countries as well as Turkmenistan, are members of NATO`s partnership for Peace Program and have military cooperation agreements with NATO.



    Copyright Eric Waddell, Global Research, 2003

    In other words, we are dealing with a potentially explosive scenario in which a number of countries, including several former Soviet republics, could be brought into a US led war with Iran. IranAtom.ru, a Russian based news and military analysis group has suggested, in this regard:

    “since Iranian nuclear objects are scattered all over the country, Israel will need a mass strike with different fly-in and fly-out approaches – Jordan, Iraq, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and other countries… Azerbaijan seriously fears Tehran’s reaction should Baku issue a permit to Israeli aircraft to overfly its territory.” (Defense and Security Russia, 12 April 2005).

    Concluding remarks

    The World is at an important crossroads.

    The Bush Administration has embarked upon a military adventure which threatens the future of humanity.

    Iran is the next military target. The planned military operation, which is by no means limited to punitive strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, is part of a project of World domination, a military roadmap, launched at the end of the Cold War.

    Military action against Iran would directly involve Israel’s participation, which in turn is likely to trigger a broader war throughout the Middle East, not to mention an implosion in the Palestinian occupied territories. Turkey is closely associated with the proposed aerial attacks.

    Israel is a nuclear power with a sophisticated nuclear arsenal. (See text box below). The use of nuclear weapons by Israel or the US cannot be excluded, particularly in view of the fact that tactical nuclear weapons have now been reclassified as a variant of the conventional bunker buster bombs and are authorized by the US Senate for use in conventional war theaters. (“they are harmless to civilians because the explosion is underground”)

    In this regard, Israel and the US rather than Iran constitute a nuclear threat.

    The planned attack on Iran must be understood in relation to the existing active war theaters in the Middle East, namely Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine.

    The conflict could easily spread from the Middle East to the Caspian sea basin. It could also involve the participation of Azerbaijan and Georgia, where US troops are stationed.

    An attack on Iran would have a direct impact on the resistance movement inside Iraq. It would also put pressure on America’s overstretched military capabilities and resources in both the Iraqi and Afghan war theaters. (The 150,000 US troops in Iraq are already fully engaged and could not be redeployed in the case of a war with Iran.)

    In other words, the shaky geopolitics of the Central Asia- Middle East region, the three existing war theaters in which America is currently, involved, the direct participation of Israel and Turkey, the structure of US sponsored military alliances, etc. raises the specter of a broader conflict.

    Moreover, US military action on Iran not only threatens Russian and Chinese interests, which have geopolitical interests in the Caspian sea basin and which have bilateral agreements with Iran. It also backlashes on European oil interests in Iran and is likely to produce major divisions between Western allies, between the US and its European partners as well as within the European Union.

    Through its participation in NATO, Europe, despite its reluctance, would be brought into the Iran operation. The participation of NATO largely hinges on a military cooperation agreement reached between NATO and Israel. This agreement would bind NATO to defend Israel against Syria and Iran. NATO would therefore support a preemptive attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, and could take on a more active role if Iran were to retaliate following US-Israeli air strikes.

    Needless to say, the war against Iran is part of a longer term US military agenda which seeks to militarize the entire Caspian sea basin, eventually leading to the destabilization and conquest of the Russian Federation.

    The Antiwar Movement

    The antiwar movement must act, consistently, to prevent the next phase of this war from happening.

    This is no easy matter. The holding of large antiwar rallies will not in itself reverse the tide of war.

    High ranking officials of the Bush administration, members of the military and the US Congress have been granted the authority to uphold an illegal war agenda.

    What is required is a grass roots network, a mass movement at national and international levels, which challenges the legitimacy of the military and political actors, and which is ultimately instrumental in unseating those who rule in our name.

    War criminals occupy positions of authority. The citizenry is galvanized into supporting the rulers, who are “committed to their safety and well-being”. Through media disinformation, war is given a humanitarian mandate.

    To reverse the tide of war, military bases must be closed down, the war machine (namely the production of advanced weapons systems) must be stopped and the burgeoning police state must be dismantled.

    The corporate backers and sponsors of war and war crimes must also be targeted including the oil companies, the defense contractors, the financial institutions and the corporate media, which has become an integral part of the war propaganda machine.

    Antiwar sentiment does not dismantle a war agenda. The war criminals in the US, Israel and Britain must be removed from high office.

    What is needed is to reveal the true face of the American Empire and the underlying criminalization of US foreign policy, which uses the “war on terrorism” and the threat of Al Qaeda to galvanize public opinion in support of a global war agenda.

    Israel’s Nuclear Capabilities

    With between 200 and 500 thermonuclear weapons and a sophisticated delivery system, Israel has quietly supplanted Britain as the World’s 5th Largest nuclear power, and may currently rival France and China in the size and sophistication of its nuclear arsenal. Although dwarfed by the nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia, each possessing over 10,000 nuclear weapons, Israel nonetheless is a major nuclear power, and should be publicly recognized as such.

    Today, estimates of the Israeli nuclear arsenal range from a minimum of 200 to a maximum of about 500. Whatever the number, there is little doubt that Israeli nukes are among the world’s most sophisticated, largely designed for “war fighting” in the Middle East. A staple of the Israeli nuclear arsenal are “neutron bombs,” miniaturized thermonuclear bombs designed to maximize deadly gamma radiation while minimizing blast effects and long term radiation- in essence designed to kill people while leaving property intact.(16) Weapons include ballistic missiles and bombers capable of reaching Moscow…

    The bombs themselves range in size from “city busters” larger than the Hiroshima Bomb to tactical mini nukes. The Israeli arsenal of weapons of mass destruction clearly dwarfs the actual or potential arsenals of all other Middle Eastern states combined, and is vastly greater than any conceivable need for “deterrence.”

    Many Middle East Peace activists have been reluctant to discuss, let alone challenge, the Israeli monopoly on nuclear weapons in the region, often leading to incomplete and uninformed analyses and flawed action strategies. Placing the issue of Israeli weapons of mass destruction directly and honestly on the table and action agenda would have several salutary effects. First, it would expose a primary destabilizing dynamic driving the Middle East arms race and compelling the region’s states to each seek their own “deterrent.”

    Second, it would expose the grotesque double standard which sees the U.S. and Europe on the one hand condemning Iraq, Iran and Syria for developing weapons of mass destruction, while simultaneously protecting and enabling the principal culprit. Third, exposing Israel’s nuclear strategy would focus international public attention, resulting in increased pressure to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction and negotiate a just peace in good faith. Finally, a nuclear free Israel would make a Nuclear Free Middle East and a comprehensive regional peace agreement much more likely. Unless and until the world community confronts Israel over its covert nuclear program it is unlikely that there will be any meaningful resolution of the Israeli/Arab conflict, a fact that Israel may be counting on as the Sharon era dawns.

    From John Steinbach, Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal, Global Research



    https://www.globalresearch.ca/planned-us-israeli-attack-on-iran-2/5615443
    A Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran is Contemplated The U.S. led War on the People of Palestine and the Middle East is a Criminal Undertaking Introduction We stand in Solidarity with Palestine. But we must recognize that the United States Military and Intelligence apparatus is firmly behind Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine. . And this must be part of the solidarity campaign, namely to Reveal the Truth regarding Washington’s insidious role, which is part of a carefully planned military agenda directed against Palestine and the broader Middle East. Netanyahu is a proxy, with a criminal record. He has the unbending support of Western Europe’s “Classe politique”. . The U.S. led War on the People of Palestine and the Middle East is a Criminal Undertaking Israel and the Zionist lobby in the U.S. are NOT exerting undue influence AGAINST U.S. Foreign Policy as outlined by numerous analysts. Quite the opposite. The Zionist lobby is firmly aligned with U.S. foreign policy, and Vice Versa. It targets those who are opposed to war, who call for a cease fire. It exerts influence in favour of the conduct of the U.S. military agenda in support of Israel. The US military-intelligence establishment in coordination with powerful financial interests is calling the shots in regards to Israel’s genocidal intent to “Wipe Palestine off the Map”. . America’s Military Doctrine: Deliberately Targeting and Killing Civilians The targeting of civilians and the killing of children in Gaza is modelled on numerous US sponsored massacres of civilians (1945-2023) including the 2004 attack on Fallujah. (More than 30 Million mainly civilian deaths in US-led wars in what is euphemistically called the “post War Era”). . Veteran War correspondent Felicity Arbuthnot reflected on the indescribable barbarity of the 2004 Fallujah massacre, which resulted in countless deaths and destruction. It was a genocide conducted by the U.S military: . “The Americans invaded, chillingly: “house to house, room to room”, raining death and destruction on the proud, ancient “City of Mosques.” Marines killed so many civilians that the municipal soccer stadium had to be turned into a graveyard … One correspondent wrote: “There has been nothing like the attack on Fallujah since the Nazi invasion and occupation of much of the European continent – the shelling and bombing of Warsaw in September 1939, the terror bombing of Rotterdam in May 1940.” Fallujah, 2004 . The U.S. is supportive of the Israeli genocide directed against the people of Palestine. Prime Minister Netanyahu is a criminal. He is Washington’s proxy, unreservedly endorsed and supported by the Biden Administration as well as the U.S. Congress. . Zionism constitutes the ideological underpinnings of contemporary U.S. imperialism and its unending war against the people of the Middle East. . The Zionist “Greater Israel” dogma –as in all wars of religion since the dawn of mankind– is there to mislead people Worldwide as to “who is really pulling the strings”. . Zionism has become a useful instrument which is embodied in U.S. military doctrine. The “Promised Land” broadly coincides with America’s hegemonic agenda in the Middle East, namely what the U.S. military has designated as the “New Middle East”. . Cui Bono: “To Whom Does it Benefit” There are strategic, geopolitical and economic objectives behind Israel’s genocide directed against the people of Palestine. “Crimes are often committed to benefit their perpetrators”: Israel’s War against the People of Palestine serves the interests of Big Money, the Military Industrial Complex, Corrupt Politicians… The Genocide is implemented by Netanyahu on behalf of the United States. The US military and intelligence apparatus are behind Israel’s criminal bombing and invasion of Gaza. The unfolding Middle East War is largely directed against Iran. . . Iran and the Nuclear Issue Historical Antecedents. Using Israel As a Means to Attacking Iran In 2003, the war on Iran project (Operation Theatre Iran Near Term, TIRANNT)) was already Déjà Vu. It had been on the drawing board of the Pentagon for more than 15 years. Let us recall that at the outset of Bush’s Second Term, Vice President Dick Cheney dropped a bombshell, hinting, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the rogue enemies of America. And that Israel would, so to speak, “be doing the bombing for us” [paraphrase] , without US military involvement and without us putting pressure on them “to do it”. For further details see my article below was first published by Global Research in May 2005, as well as PBS Interview with Z. Brzezinski This Dick Cheney-style option is currently (November 2023) once more on the drawing board of the Pentagon, namely the possibility that Israel which is already bombing Lebanon and Syria, would be incited to wage an attack on Iran (acting on behalf of the United States). US Congress Resolution (H. RES. 559) Accuses Iran of Possessing Nuclear Weapons Careful timing: In June 2023, the US House of Representatives adopted Resolution (H. RES. 559) which provides a “Green Light” to wage war on Iran. The US House passed a resolution that allows the use of force against Iran, intimating without a shred of evidence that Iran has Nuclear Weapons: Resolved, That the House of Representatives declares it is the policy of the United States— (1) that a nuclear Islamic Republic of Iran is not acceptable; (2) that Iran must not be able to obtain a nuclear weapon under any circumstances or conditions; (3) to use all means necessary to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon; and (4) to recognize and support the freedom of action of partners and allies, including Israel, to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Click below to access the complete text of H. RES 559 Israel’s Undeclared Nuclear Weapons Arsenal Whereas Iran is tagged (without evidence) as a Nuclear Power by the U.S. House of Representatives, Washington fails to acknowledge that Israel is an undeclared nuclear power. In recent developments, Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu, “admitted to the world that Israel has nuclear weapons ready to be used against Palestinians” The Times of Israel reported that: “Amichai Eliyahu said Sunday [November 5, 2023] that one of Israel’s options in the war against Hamas was to drop a nuclear bomb on the Gaza Strip” Video on Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Facility English subtitles . . The War on Energy Unspoken Objective of a US-NATO-Israel War against Iran: Natural Gas Reserves of Natural Gas: Iran ranks Second after Russia. Russia, Iran and Qatar possess 54.1 percent of the World’s reserves of natural gas. -Russia 24.3%, -Iran 17.3%, -Qatar, 12.5 % (in partnership with Iran) versus -5.3 % for the US President Joe Biden ordered to “blow up” (September 2022) the Nordstream Pipeline, which constitutes a U.S. Act of War against the European Union. In the words of Joe Biden: “There will be no longer a Nord Stream 2”. Statement at White House Press Conference (February 7, 2022) America’s strategic objective was, despite its meagre reserves of natural gas: To Force the European Union to buy LNG “Made in America”. What this implies is that America’s military agenda against Russia and Iran constitutes a means to hike up EU energy prices, which is an act economic warfare against the People of Europe. The Iran-Qatar Natural Gas Partnership The maritime gas reserves of the Persian Gulf are under a (joint ownership) partnership between Qatar and Iran (See diagram below). The Biden Administration is Intent upon Destabilizing the Iran-Qatar Partnership This partnership is supportive of the People of Palestine. In March 2022, “President Joe Biden following a meeting with Qatar’s Emir Sheik Tamim “designated Qatar as a major non-NATO ally of the United States, fulfilling the promise that he had made to Qatar earlier this year [2022], the White House said” Reuters “The designation is granted by the United States to close, non-NATO allies that have strategic working relationships with the U.S. military. Biden promised Qatar’s emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, in January [2022] during a meeting at the White House that he would grant Qatar the special status.” Reuters See also followup Reuters article. What is at stake are cross-cutting coalitions. Qatar is a “Partner” of Iran in relation to the strategic reserves of maritime gas in the Persian Gulf. There is no formaI military cooperation between the two countries. Washington’s unspoken agenda is to break and/or destabilize Qatar’s Partnership with Iran, by integrating Qatar into the US-NATO military orbit. It is worth noting that a few days prior to the October 7, 2023 Hamas operation, the Emir of Qatar Sheik Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani “laid the foundation stone for the Northern Dome expansion project” in Iran’s Pars South Field (See map above). “the Emir of Qatar said the groundbreaking for the Northern Dome expansion project was laid today, which is in line with Qatar’s strategy to strengthen its position as a global LNG producer … This joint gas field, known as “South Pars” in Iran, is the largest natural gas field in the world and contains 50.97 trillion cubic meters of gas and about 7.9 billion cubic meters of natural gas condensate. At the time of writing, the implications of Qatar’s “Special Status” Military Alliance with the U.S. remain unclear. America’s Al-Udeid military base in Qatar (left) is the largest US base in the Middle East. Have the status and functions of Al Udeid changed since the signing of the March 2022 agreement designating Qatar as a “Major Non NATO Ally of the US” Qatar is both A Partner of Iran as well as a Major Non NATO Ally of the U.S. Reports confirm the development of a close relationship between the commanders of the US Air Force and the Qatari Emiri Air Force. Qatar is a “Powder Keg”? The U.S. foreign policy objective is to ultimately destroy and undermine that “friendship” with Iran which is highly valued and supported by Qatari citizens. The export of gas from South Pars North Dome transits through Iran, Turkey and Russia. Qatar, Russia and Iran (the 3 largest holders Worldwide of natural gas reserves) reached an agreement in 2009 to create a ‘Gas Troika’, a trilateral gas cooperation entity including the development of joint projects. A large number of countries including South Korea, India, Japan, China are importing LNG from Qatar. Last year (November 2022), “QatarEnergy signed a 27-year deal to supply China’s Sinopec with liquefied natural gas”. Qatar has also a strategic alliance with China. Washington’s objective under the disguise of America’s “Major Non-NATO Alliance” with Qatar is to: Break the Qatar-Iran Partnership Exclude Iran from the Joint Maritime Gas Field Exert US Control over the Maritime Gas Field in the Persian Gulf Weaken and Disable the “Gas Troika” (Russia, Iran, Qatar) Create Chaos in the Global Energy Market, Undermine the Trade in Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) to Numerous Countries . Iran. Third Largest Reserves of Oil Worldwide Iran is not only second in terms of its gas reserves after Russia, it ranks third Worldwide in relation to its oil reserves (12% of Worldwide oil reserves) versus a meagre 4% for the U.S. The Ben Gurion Canal Project . U.S. Seeks Dominance over Strategic International Waterways The Ben Gurion Canal Project was initially a “secret” (classified) U.S. project formulated in 1963 by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNG, a strategic think tank (focussing on nuclear radiation) on contract with the U.S Department of Energy. The LLNG project was formulated in response to the nationalization of the Suez Canal in July 1956 by President Gamal Abdel Nasser (1956-1970). Its intent was to bypass the Suez Canal. The Ben Gurion Canal project is currently contemplated as means control the channels of international maritime trade to the detriment of the people of the Middle East. It also seeks to destabilize China’s maritime commodity trade. In the context of the broader US-led Middle East War, the Ben Gurion Canal Project is part of America’s hegemonic military agenda. It is consistent with Netanyahu’s “Plan to Wipe Palestine Off the Map”. According to Yvonne Ridley: “The only thing stopping the newly-revised [Ben Gurion Canal] project from being revived and rubber-stamped is the presence of the Palestinians in Gaza. As far as Netanyahu is concerned they are standing in the way of the project” (Yvonne Ridley, November 10, 2023, emphasis added) The U.S led war is intent upon confiscating all Palestinian territories, which would be appropriated by the State of Israel, acting as a strategic “Anglo-American Hub” in the Middle East: The Ben Gurion Canal will give Israel in particular and other friendly nations the freedom from blackmail arising out of access to the Suez Canal. Arab states have been leveraging the Red Sea to pressure Israel and in response, Israel has decided to gain more control of the Red Sea. These African countries have cultural and economic affinities with the Arab states. One of the main military benefits for Israel is that it gives Israel the strategic options as the Ben Gurion Canal will totally take away the importance of Suez for the US military if needed in the aid for Israel. Israel aims to push Egypt further into a corner by eliminating Suez in the global trade and energy corridor and becoming a global trade and energy logistics center. Experts are of the opinion that this situation will shake the strategic-energy balance of China’s Belt and Road Project initiative in the Mediterranean, along with the Strait of Hormuz, which is the transfer point of 30 percent of the world’s energy. The Ben Gurion Canal would have the solid backing of the West. (Eurasia Review, November 7, 2023, emphasis added) . “Greater Israel”. Strategic “Anglo-American Hub” The Promised Land of Greater Israel coincides with America’s Colonial Design in the Middle East The Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy, its strategic objective is to extend US hegemony as well as fracture and balkanize the Middle East. In this regard, Washington’s strategy consists in destabilizing and weakening regional economic powers in the Middle East including Turkey and Iran. This policy –which is consistent with the Greater Israel– is accompanied by a process of political fragmentation. Since the Gulf war (1991), the Pentagon has contemplated the creation of a “Free Kurdistan” which would include the annexation of parts of Iraq, Syria and Iran as well as Turkey “The New Middle East”: Unofficial US Military Academy Map by Lt. Col. Ralph Peters . “America’s Promised Land”. Global Warfare When viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist Plan for the Middle East coincides with America’s long war against the Middle East. As we mentioned earlier the Zionist agenda provides an ideological and religious justification of America’s long war against the Middle East. The 1979-80. the so-called Soviet Afghan War, engineered by the CIA The 1980-88 Iraq-Iran War engineered by the U.S. The 1991 Gulf War against Iraq, The 2001 The US-NATO Invasion of Afghanistan, The 2003 Invasion of Iraq The 2006 War on Lebanon, The Arab Spring, The 2011 war on Libya, The 2015 war on Yemen Obama’s 2014-2017 “Counter-Terrorism” Operation against Iraq and Syria The ongoing wars against Syria, Iraq and Yemen The “Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist project, with the support of NATO. Needless to day, the ideological and religious underpinnings of the “Greater Israel” project are consistent with America’s imperial design. While the Zionist agenda is not the driving force, it serves the useful purpose of misleading public opinion concerning America’s long war against the people of the Middle East. The Historical Context: A Sequence of Military Plans and Scenarios to Wage War on Iran Since the launching of the Theater Iran Near Term (TIRANNT) war games scenario in May 2003 (leaked classified doc), an escalation scenario involving military action directed against Iran and Syria had been envisaged, of which Syria was the first stage. TIRANNT was followed by a series of military plans pertaining to Iran. Numerous post 9/11 official statements and US military documents had pointed to an expanded Middle East war, involving the active participation of Israel. Israel is America’s ally. Military operations are closely coordinated. Israel does not act without Washington’s approval. U.S.-Israeli Air Defense Barely acknowledged by the media, the US and Israel have an integrated air defense system, which was set up in early 2009, shortly after the Israel invasion of Gaza under “Operation Cast Led”. The X-band radar air defense system set up by the US in Israel in 2009 would “integrate Israel’s missile defenses with the U.S. global missile detection network, which includes satellites, Aegis ships on the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Red Sea, and land-based Patriot radars and interceptors.” (Sen. Joseph Azzolina, Protecting Israel from Iran’s missiles, Bayshore News, December 26, 2008). ) What this means is that Washington calls the shots. Confirmed by the Pentagon, the US military controls Israel’s Air Defense: ”This is and will remain a U.S. radar system,’ Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said. ‘So this is not something we are giving or selling to the Israelis and it is something that will likely require U.S. personnel on-site to operate.’” (Quoted in Israel National News, January 9, 2009, emphasis added). At the outset of Obama’s Second Term, the US and Israel initiated discussions pertaining to a “US personnel on site” presence in Israel, namely the establishment of a “permanent” and “official” military base inside Israel. And on September 17, 2017, a US Air Defense base located in the Negev desert was inaugurated. According to the Israeli IDF spokesperson, the objective is to send a “message to the region, ” including Iran, Lebanon, Syria and Palestine. Of utmost relevance: Israel would not be able to act unilaterally against Iran, without a green light from the Pentagon which controls key components of Israel’s air defense system. In practice, a war on Iran, would be a joint US-NATO-Israeli endeavor, coordinated by US Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with America’s allies playing a key (subordinate) role. Michel Chossudovsky, October 31, 2017, November 11, 2023 Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran by Michel Chossudovsky May 2005 At the outset of Bush’s second term, Vice President Dick Cheney dropped a bombshell. He hinted, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the rogue enemies of America, and that Israel would, so to speak, “be doing the bombing for us”, without US military involvement and without us putting pressure on them “to do it”: “One of the concerns people have is that Israel might do it without being asked… Given the fact that Iran has a stated policy that their objective is the destruction of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards,” (quoted from an MSNBC Interview Jan 2005) Israel is a Rottweiler on a leash: The US wants to “set Israel loose” to attack Iran. Commenting the Vice President’s assertion, former National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in an interview on PBS, confirmed with some apprehension, yes: Cheney wants Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to act on America’s behalf and “do it” for us: “Iran I think is more ambiguous. And there the issue is certainly not tyranny; it’s nuclear weapons. And the vice president today in a kind of a strange parallel statement to this declaration of freedom hinted that the Israelis may do it and in fact used language which sounds like a justification or even an encouragement for the Israelis to do it.” The foregoing statements are misleading. The US is not “encouraging Israel”. What we are dealing with is a joint US-Israeli military operation to bomb Iran, which has been in the active planning stage for more than a year. The Neocons in the Defense Department, under Douglas Feith, have been working assiduously with their Israeli military and intelligence counterparts, carefully identifying targets inside Iran (see Seymour Hersh) Under this working arrangement, Israel will not act unilaterally, without a green light from Washington. In other words, Israel will not implement an attack without the participation of the US. Covert Intelligence Operations: Stirring Ethnic Tensions in Iran Meanwhile, for the last two years, Washington has been involved in covert intelligence operations inside Iran. American and British intelligence and special forces (working with their Israeli counterparts) are involved in this operation. “A British intelligence official said that any campaign against Iran would not be a ground war like the one in Iraq. The Americans will use different tactics, said the intelligence officer. ‘It is getting quite scary.'” (Evening Standard, 17 June 2003) The expectation is that a US-Israeli bombing raid of Iran’s nuclear facilities will stir up ethnic tensions and trigger “regime change” in favor of the US. (See Arab Monitor). Bush advisers believe that the “Iranian opposition movement” will unseat the Mullahs. This assessment constitutes a gross misjudgment of social forces inside Iran. What is more likely to occur is that Iranians will consistently rally behind a wartime government against foreign aggression. In fact, the entire Middle East and beyond would rise up against US interventionism. Retaliation in the Case of a US-Israeli Aerial Attack Tehran has confirmed that it will retaliate if attacked, in the form of ballistic missile strikes directed against Israel (CNN, 8 Feb 2005). These attacks, could also target US military facilities in the Persian Gulf, which would immediately lead us into a scenario of military escalation and all out war. In other words, the air strikes against Iran could contribute to unleashing a war in the broader Middle East Central Asian region. Moreover, the planned attack on Iran should also be understood in relation to the timely withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon, which has opened up a new space, for the deployment of Israeli forces. The participation of Turkey in the US-Israeli military operation is also a factor, following an agreement reached between Ankara and Tel Aviv. In other words, US and Israeli military planners must carefully weigh the far-reaching implications of their actions. Israel Builds up its Stockpile of Deadly Military Hardware A massive buildup in military hardware has occurred in preparation for a possible attack on Iran. Israel has recently taken delivery from the US of some 5,000 “smart air launched weapons” including some 500 BLU 109 ‘bunker-buster bombs. The (uranium coated) munitions are said to be more than “adequate to address the full range of Iranian targets, with the possible exception of the buried facility at Natanz, which may require the [more powerful] BLU-113 bunker buster“: “Given Israel’s already substantial holdings of such weapons, this increase in its inventory would allow a sustained assault with or without further US involvement.” (See Richard Bennett) Gbu 28 Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28) The Israeli Air Force would attack Iran’s nuclear facility at Bushehr using US as well Israeli produced bunker buster bombs. The attack would be carried out in three separate waves “with the radar and communications jamming protection being provided by U.S. Air Force AWACS and other U.S. aircraft in the area”. (See W Madsen) Bear in mind that the bunker buster bombs can also be used to deliver tactical nuclear bombs. The B61-11 is the “nuclear version” of the “conventional” BLU 113. It can be delivered in much same way as the conventional bunker buster bomb. (See Michel Chossudovsky, see also this) According to the Pentagon, tactical nuclear weapons are “safe for civilians”. Their use has been authorized by the US Senate. (See Michel Chossudovsky) Moreover, reported in late 2003, Israeli Dolphin-class submarines equipped with US Harpoon missiles armed with nuclear warheads are now aimed at Iran. (See Gordon Thomas) Even if tactical nuclear weapons are not used by Israel, an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities not only raises the specter of a broader war, but also of nuclear radiation over a wide area: “To attack Iran’s nuclear facilities will not only provoke war, but it could also unleash clouds of radiation far beyond the targets and the borders of Iran.” (Statement of Prof Elias Tuma, Arab Internet Network, Federal News Service, 1 March 2005) Moreover, while most reports have centered on the issue of punitive air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, the strikes would most probably extend to other targets. While a ground war is contemplated as a possible “scenario” at the level of military planning, the US military would not be able to wage a an effective ground war, given the situation in Iraq. In the words of former National Security Adviser Lawrence Eagelberger: “We are not going to get in a ground war in Iran, I hope. If we get into that, we are in serious trouble. I don’t think anyone in Washington is seriously considering that.” ( quoted in the National Journal, 4 December 2004). Iran’s Military Capabilities Despite its overall weaknesses in relation to Israel and the US, Iran has an advanced air defense system, deployed to protect its nuclear sites; “they are dispersed and underground making potential air strikes difficult and without any guarantees of success.” (Jerusalem Post, 20 April 2005). It has upgraded its Shahab-3 missile, which can reach targets in Israel. Iran’s armed forces have recently conducted high-profile military exercises in anticipation of a US led attack. Iran also possesses some 12 X-55 strategic cruise missiles, produced by Ukraine. Iran’s air defense systems is said to feature Russian SA-2, SA-5, SA-6 as well as shoulder-launched SA-7 missiles (Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies). The US “Military Road Map” The Bush administration has officially identified Iran and Syria as the next stage of “the road map to war”. Targeting Iran is a bipartisan project, which broadly serves the interests of the Anglo-American oil conglomerates, the Wall Street financial establishment and the military-industrial complex. The broader Middle East-Central Asian region encompasses more than 70% of the World’s reserves of oil and natural gas. Iran possesses 10% of the world’s oil and ranks third after Saudi Arabia (25 %) and Iraq (11 %) in the size of its reserves. In comparison, the US possesses less than 2.8 % of global oil reserves. (See Eric Waddell, The Battle for Oil) The announcement to target Iran should come as no surprise. It is part of the battle for oil. Already during the Clinton administration, US Central Command (USCENTCOM) had formulated “in war theater plans” to invade both Iraq and Iran: “The broad national security interests and objectives expressed in the President’s National Security Strategy (NSS) and the Chairman’s National Military Strategy (NMS) form the foundation of the United States Central Command’s theater strategy. The NSS directs implementation of a strategy of dual containment of the rogue states of Iraq and Iran as long as those states pose a threat to U.S. interests, to other states in the region, and to their own citizens. Dual containment is designed to maintain the balance of power in the region without depending on either Iraq or Iran. USCENTCOM’s theater strategy is interest-based and threat-focused. The purpose of U.S. engagement, as espoused in the NSS, is to protect the United States’ vital interest in the region – uninterrupted, secure U.S./Allied access to Gulf oil. (USCENTCOM, USPolicy , emphasis added) Main Military Actors While the US, Israel, as well as Turkey (with borders with both Iran and Syria) are the main actors in this process, a number of other countries, in the region, allies of the US, including several Central Asian former Soviet republics have been enlisted. Britain is closely involved despite its official denials at the diplomatic level. Turkey occupies a central role in the Iran operation. It has an extensive military cooperation agreement with Israel. There are indications that NATO is also formally involved in the context of an Israel-NATO agreement reached in November 2004. Planning The Aerial Attack on Iran According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter, George W. Bush has already signed off on orders for an aerial attack on Iran, scheduled for June.(See this) The June cut-off date should be understood. It does not signify that the attack will occur in June. What it suggests is that the US and Israel are “in a state of readiness” and are prepared to launch an attack by June or at a later date. In other words, the decision to launch the attack has not been made. Ritter’s observation concerning an impending military operation should nonetheless be taken seriously. In recent months, there is ample evidence that a major military operation is in preparation: 1) several high profile military exercises have been conducted in recent months, involving military deployment and the testing of weapons systems. 2) military planning meetings have been held between the various parties involved. There has been a shuttle of military and government officials between Washington, Tel Aviv and Ankara. 3) A significant change in the military command structure in Israel has occurred, with the appointment of a new Chief of Staff. 4) Intense diplomatic exchanges have been carried out at the international level with a view to securing areas of military cooperation and/or support for a US-Israeli led military operation directed against Iran. 5) Ongoing intelligence operations inside Iran have been stepped up. 6) Consensus Building: Media propaganda on the need to intervene in Iran has been stepped up, with daily reports on how Iran constitutes a threat to peace and global security. Timeline of Key Initiatives In the last few months, various key initiatives have been taken, which are broadly indicative that an aerial bombing of Iran is in the military pipeline: November 2004 in Brussels: NATO-Israel protocol: Israel’s IDF delegation to the NATO conference to met with military brass of six members of the Mediterranean basin nations, including Egypt, Jordan, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria and Mauritania. NATO seeks to revive the framework, known as the Mediterranean Dialogue program, which would include Israel. The Israeli delegation accepted to participate in military exercises and “anti-terror maneuvers” together with several Arab countries. January 2005: the US, Israel and Turkey held military exercises in the Eastern Mediterranean, off the coast of Syria. These exercises, which have been held in previous years were described as routine. February 2005. Following the decision reached in Brussels in November 2004, Israel was involved for the first time in military exercises with NATO, which also included several Arab countries. February 2005: Assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The assassination, which was blamed on Syria, serves Israeli and US interests and was used as a pretext to demand the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon. February 2005: Sharon fires his Chief-of-Staff, Moshe Ya’alon and appoints Air Force General Dan Halutz. This is the first time in Israeli history that an Air Force General is appointed Chief of Staff (See Uri Avnery) The appointment of Major General Dan Halutz as IDF Chief of Staff is considered in Israeli political circles as “the appointment of the right man at the right time.” The central issue is that a major aerial operation against Iran is in the planning stage, and Maj General Halutz is slated to coordinate the aerial bombing raids on Iran. Halutz’s appointment was specifically linked to Israel’s Iran agenda: “As chief of staff, he will in the best position to prepare the military for such a scenario.” March 2005: NATO’s Secretary General was in Jerusalem for follow-up talks with Ariel Sharon and Israel’s military brass, following the joint NATO-Israel military exercise in February. These military cooperation ties are viewed by the Israeli military as a means to “enhance Israel’s deterrence capability regarding potential enemies threatening it, mainly Iran and Syria.” The premise underlying NATO-Israel military cooperation is that Israel is under attack: “The more Israel’s image is strengthened as a country facing enemies who attempt to attack it for no justified reason, the greater will be the possibility that aid will be extended to Israel by NATO. Furthermore, Iran and Syria will have to take into account the possibility that the increasing cooperation between Israel and NATO will strengthen Israel’s links with Turkey, also a member of NATO. Given Turkey’s impressive military potential and its geographic proximity to both Iran and Syria, Israel’s operational options against them, if and when it sees the need, could gain considerable strength. ” (Jaffa Center for Strategic Studies, http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/sa/v7n4p4Shalom.html ) The Israel-NATO protocol is all the more important because it obligates NATO to align itself with the US-Israeli plan to bomb Iran, as an act of self defense on the part of Israel. It also means that NATO is also involved in the process of military consultations relating to the planned aerial bombing of Iran. It is of course related to the bilateral military cooperation agreement between Israel and Turkey and the likelihood that part of the military operation will be launched from Turkey, which is a member of NATO. Late March 2005: News leaks in Israel indicated an “initial authorization” by Prime Minster Ariel Sharon of an Israeli attack on Iran’s Natanz uranium enrichment plant “if diplomacy failed to stop Iran’s nuclear program”. (The Hindu, 28 March 2005) March-April 2005: The Holding in Israel of Joint US-Israeli military exercises specifically pertaining to the launching of Patriot missiles. US Patriot missile crews stationed in Germany were sent to Israel to participate in the joint Juniper Cobra exercise with the Israeli military. The exercise was described as routine and “unconnected to events in the Middle East”: “As always, we are interested in implementing lessons learned from training exercises.” (UPI, 9 March 2005). April 2005: Donald Rumsfeld (right) was on an official visits to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan. His diplomatic endeavors were described by the Russian media as “literally circling Iran in an attempt to find the best bridgehead for a possible military operation against that country.” In Baku, Azerbaijan Rumsfeld was busy discussing the date for deployment of US troops in Azerbaijan on Iran’s North-Western border. US military bases described as “mobile groups” in Azerbaijan are slated to play a role in a military operation directed against Iran. Azerbaijan is a member of GUUAM, a military cooperation agreement with the US and NATO, which allows for the stationing of US troops in several of the member countries, including Georgia, Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. The stated short term objective is to “neutralize Iran”. The longer term objective under the Pentagon’s “Caspian Plan” is to exert military and economic control over the entire Caspian sea basin, with a view to ensuring US authority over oil reserves and pipeline corridors. During his visit in April, Rumsfeld was pushing the US initiative of establishing “American special task forces and military bases to secure US influence in the Caspian region: “Called Caspian Watch, the project stipulates a network of special task forces and police units in the countries of the regions to be used in emergencies including threats to objects of the oil complex and pipelines. Project Caspian Watch will be financed by the United States ($100 million). It will become an advance guard of the US European Command whose zone of responsibility includes the Caspian region. Command center of the project with a powerful radar is to be located in Baku.” ( Defense and Security Russia, April 27, 2005) Rumsfeld’s visit followed shortly after that of Iranian President Mohammad Khatami’s to Baku. April 2005: Iran signs a military cooperation with Tajikistan, which occupies a strategic position bordering Afghanistan’s Northern frontier. Tajikistan is a member of “The Shanghai Five” military cooperation group, which also includes Kazakhstan, China, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia. Iran also has economic cooperation agreements with Turkmenistan. Mid April 2005: Israel Prime Minister Ariel Sharon meets George W Bush at his Texas Ranch. Iran is on the agenda of bilateral talks. More significantly, the visit of Ariel Sharon was used to carry out high level talks between US and Israeli military planners pertaining to Iran. Late April 2005. President Vladmir Putin is in Israel on an official visit. He announces Russia’s decision to sell short-range anti-aircraft missiles to Syria and to continue supporting Iran’s nuclear industry. Beneath the gilded surface of international diplomacy, Putin’s timely visit to Israel must be interpreted as “a signal to Israel” regarding its planned aerial attack on Iran. Late April 2005: US pressure in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been exerted with a view to blocking the re-appointment of Mohammed Al Baradei, who according to US officials “is not being tough enough on Iran…” Following US pressures, the vote on the appointment of a new IAEA chief was put off until June. These developments suggest that Washington wants to put forth their own hand-picked nominee prior to launching US-Israeli aerial attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities. (See VOA). (In February 2003, Al Baradei along with UN chief weapons inspector Hans Blix challenged the (phony) intelligence on WMD presented by the US to the UN Security Council, with a view to justifying the war on Iraq.) Late April 2005. Sale of deadly military hardware to Israel. GBU-28 Buster Bunker Bombs: Coinciding with Putin’s visit to Israel, the US Defence Security Cooperation Agency (Department of Defense) announced the sale of an additional 100 bunker-buster bombs produced by Lockheed Martin to Israel. This decision was viewed by the US media as “a warning to Iran about its nuclear ambitions.” The sale pertains to the larger and more sophisticated “Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28) BLU-113 Penetrator” (including the WGU-36A/B guidance control unit and support equipment). The GBU-28 is described as “a special weapon for penetrating hardened command centers located deep underground. The fact of the matter is that the GBU-28 is among the World’s most deadly “conventional” weapons used in the 2003 invasion of Iraq, capable of causing thousands of civilian deaths through massive explosions. The Israeli Air Force are slated to use the GBU-28s on their F-15 aircraft. (See text of DSCA news release) Late April 2005- early May: Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right) in Israel for follow-up talks with Ariel Sharon. He was accompanied by his Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul, who met with senior Israeli military officials. On the official agenda of these talks: joint defense projects, including the joint production of Arrow II Theater Missile Defense and Popeye II missiles. The latter also known as the Have Lite, are advanced small missiles, designed for deployment on fighter planes. Tel Aviv and Ankara decide to establish a hotline to share intelligence. May 2005: Syrian troops scheduled to withdraw from Lebanon, leading to a major shift in the Middle East security situation, in favor of Israel and the US. Iran Surrounded The US has troops and military bases in Turkey, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, and of course Iraq. In other words, Iran is virtually surrounded by US military bases. (see Map below). These countries as well as Turkmenistan, are members of NATO`s partnership for Peace Program and have military cooperation agreements with NATO. Copyright Eric Waddell, Global Research, 2003 In other words, we are dealing with a potentially explosive scenario in which a number of countries, including several former Soviet republics, could be brought into a US led war with Iran. IranAtom.ru, a Russian based news and military analysis group has suggested, in this regard: “since Iranian nuclear objects are scattered all over the country, Israel will need a mass strike with different fly-in and fly-out approaches – Jordan, Iraq, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and other countries… Azerbaijan seriously fears Tehran’s reaction should Baku issue a permit to Israeli aircraft to overfly its territory.” (Defense and Security Russia, 12 April 2005). Concluding remarks The World is at an important crossroads. The Bush Administration has embarked upon a military adventure which threatens the future of humanity. Iran is the next military target. The planned military operation, which is by no means limited to punitive strikes against Iran’s nuclear facilities, is part of a project of World domination, a military roadmap, launched at the end of the Cold War. Military action against Iran would directly involve Israel’s participation, which in turn is likely to trigger a broader war throughout the Middle East, not to mention an implosion in the Palestinian occupied territories. Turkey is closely associated with the proposed aerial attacks. Israel is a nuclear power with a sophisticated nuclear arsenal. (See text box below). The use of nuclear weapons by Israel or the US cannot be excluded, particularly in view of the fact that tactical nuclear weapons have now been reclassified as a variant of the conventional bunker buster bombs and are authorized by the US Senate for use in conventional war theaters. (“they are harmless to civilians because the explosion is underground”) In this regard, Israel and the US rather than Iran constitute a nuclear threat. The planned attack on Iran must be understood in relation to the existing active war theaters in the Middle East, namely Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine. The conflict could easily spread from the Middle East to the Caspian sea basin. It could also involve the participation of Azerbaijan and Georgia, where US troops are stationed. An attack on Iran would have a direct impact on the resistance movement inside Iraq. It would also put pressure on America’s overstretched military capabilities and resources in both the Iraqi and Afghan war theaters. (The 150,000 US troops in Iraq are already fully engaged and could not be redeployed in the case of a war with Iran.) In other words, the shaky geopolitics of the Central Asia- Middle East region, the three existing war theaters in which America is currently, involved, the direct participation of Israel and Turkey, the structure of US sponsored military alliances, etc. raises the specter of a broader conflict. Moreover, US military action on Iran not only threatens Russian and Chinese interests, which have geopolitical interests in the Caspian sea basin and which have bilateral agreements with Iran. It also backlashes on European oil interests in Iran and is likely to produce major divisions between Western allies, between the US and its European partners as well as within the European Union. Through its participation in NATO, Europe, despite its reluctance, would be brought into the Iran operation. The participation of NATO largely hinges on a military cooperation agreement reached between NATO and Israel. This agreement would bind NATO to defend Israel against Syria and Iran. NATO would therefore support a preemptive attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities, and could take on a more active role if Iran were to retaliate following US-Israeli air strikes. Needless to say, the war against Iran is part of a longer term US military agenda which seeks to militarize the entire Caspian sea basin, eventually leading to the destabilization and conquest of the Russian Federation. The Antiwar Movement The antiwar movement must act, consistently, to prevent the next phase of this war from happening. This is no easy matter. The holding of large antiwar rallies will not in itself reverse the tide of war. High ranking officials of the Bush administration, members of the military and the US Congress have been granted the authority to uphold an illegal war agenda. What is required is a grass roots network, a mass movement at national and international levels, which challenges the legitimacy of the military and political actors, and which is ultimately instrumental in unseating those who rule in our name. War criminals occupy positions of authority. The citizenry is galvanized into supporting the rulers, who are “committed to their safety and well-being”. Through media disinformation, war is given a humanitarian mandate. To reverse the tide of war, military bases must be closed down, the war machine (namely the production of advanced weapons systems) must be stopped and the burgeoning police state must be dismantled. The corporate backers and sponsors of war and war crimes must also be targeted including the oil companies, the defense contractors, the financial institutions and the corporate media, which has become an integral part of the war propaganda machine. Antiwar sentiment does not dismantle a war agenda. The war criminals in the US, Israel and Britain must be removed from high office. What is needed is to reveal the true face of the American Empire and the underlying criminalization of US foreign policy, which uses the “war on terrorism” and the threat of Al Qaeda to galvanize public opinion in support of a global war agenda. Israel’s Nuclear Capabilities With between 200 and 500 thermonuclear weapons and a sophisticated delivery system, Israel has quietly supplanted Britain as the World’s 5th Largest nuclear power, and may currently rival France and China in the size and sophistication of its nuclear arsenal. Although dwarfed by the nuclear arsenals of the U.S. and Russia, each possessing over 10,000 nuclear weapons, Israel nonetheless is a major nuclear power, and should be publicly recognized as such. Today, estimates of the Israeli nuclear arsenal range from a minimum of 200 to a maximum of about 500. Whatever the number, there is little doubt that Israeli nukes are among the world’s most sophisticated, largely designed for “war fighting” in the Middle East. A staple of the Israeli nuclear arsenal are “neutron bombs,” miniaturized thermonuclear bombs designed to maximize deadly gamma radiation while minimizing blast effects and long term radiation- in essence designed to kill people while leaving property intact.(16) Weapons include ballistic missiles and bombers capable of reaching Moscow… The bombs themselves range in size from “city busters” larger than the Hiroshima Bomb to tactical mini nukes. The Israeli arsenal of weapons of mass destruction clearly dwarfs the actual or potential arsenals of all other Middle Eastern states combined, and is vastly greater than any conceivable need for “deterrence.” Many Middle East Peace activists have been reluctant to discuss, let alone challenge, the Israeli monopoly on nuclear weapons in the region, often leading to incomplete and uninformed analyses and flawed action strategies. Placing the issue of Israeli weapons of mass destruction directly and honestly on the table and action agenda would have several salutary effects. First, it would expose a primary destabilizing dynamic driving the Middle East arms race and compelling the region’s states to each seek their own “deterrent.” Second, it would expose the grotesque double standard which sees the U.S. and Europe on the one hand condemning Iraq, Iran and Syria for developing weapons of mass destruction, while simultaneously protecting and enabling the principal culprit. Third, exposing Israel’s nuclear strategy would focus international public attention, resulting in increased pressure to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction and negotiate a just peace in good faith. Finally, a nuclear free Israel would make a Nuclear Free Middle East and a comprehensive regional peace agreement much more likely. Unless and until the world community confronts Israel over its covert nuclear program it is unlikely that there will be any meaningful resolution of the Israeli/Arab conflict, a fact that Israel may be counting on as the Sharon era dawns. From John Steinbach, Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal, Global Research https://www.globalresearch.ca/planned-us-israeli-attack-on-iran-2/5615443
    WWW.GLOBALRESEARCH.CA
    A Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran is Contemplated
    Introduction We stand in Solidarity with Palestine. But we must recognize that the United States Military and Intelligence apparatus is firmly behind Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine. . And this must be part of the solidarity campaign, namely to Reveal the Truth regarding Washington’s insidious role, which is part of a carefully planned military agenda directed against Palestine …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 28996 Views
  • The sunshine, some soothing Japanese instrumental music, and a cup of hibiscus tea are all things I'm taking pleasure in between my work commitments today. Up till now, the ideal combination ????

    Happy Tuesday everyone! ????.


    #SomeeEvolution #Somee #Hive #OriginalContentOnly #WorkingFromHome #BreakTime #Music #CupOfTea #Sunshine
    The sunshine, some soothing Japanese instrumental music, and a cup of hibiscus tea are all things I'm taking pleasure in between my work commitments today. Up till now, the ideal combination ???? Happy Tuesday everyone! ????. #SomeeEvolution #Somee #Hive #OriginalContentOnly #WorkingFromHome #BreakTime #Music #CupOfTea #Sunshine
    Like
    Wow
    19
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3086 Views

  • Dogecoin is a digital currency that was created in 2013 as a light-hearted parody of Bitcoin, the world's first cryptocurrency. It was initially intended to be a fun project by its founders, Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer, who aimed to create a cryptocurrency that was easy to use, widely accessible, and had a strong community aspect. Over the years, the popularity of Dogecoin has soared, and it has become one of the most talked-about cryptocurrencies in the market. So, what exactly makes Dogecoin so popular?
    Firstly, Dogecoin has a strong and active community that is very loyal to the currency. The community is characterized by its friendly and supportive atmosphere, which has led to many memes, inside jokes, and even charitable initiatives. The Dogecoin community has also been instrumental in helping the currency gain traction, with members promoting the currency on social media platforms, online forums, and other online communities. This has helped to increase awareness of the currency and has led to an increase in adoption.
    Secondly, Dogecoin is very accessible and easy to use. Unlike other cryptocurrencies that require users to have a high level of technical knowledge and expertise, Dogecoin is designed to be user-friendly and approachable. The wallet interface is simple and straightforward, and transactions are fast and easy to process. This has made it an attractive option for people who are new to cryptocurrencies and are looking for a simple way to get started.
    Thirdly, Dogecoin has received a significant amount of media attention over the years. This has helped to boost its popularity and has led to increased adoption. The currency has been mentioned in various news articles, TV shows, and even by high-profile individuals such as Elon Musk. This exposure has helped to attract new users to the currency and has helped to create a sense of legitimacy around it.
    Fourthly, Dogecoin has gained popularity as a result of its strong performance in the cryptocurrency market. Although it started out as a joke, Dogecoin's value has skyrocketed in recent years. This has led to many investors and traders seeing it as a viable investment option, leading to an increase in demand for the currency.
    Lastly, Dogecoin has been associated with several charitable initiatives over the years. For example, in 2014, the Dogecoin community raised funds to help the Jamaican bobsled team get to the Winter Olympics. More recently, the currency has been used to raise money for various charitable causes, such as providing clean water to people in developing countries. This has helped to create a sense of community around the currency and has given people a reason to invest in it beyond just financial gain.
    In summary, Dogecoin's popularity can be attributed to its strong community, accessibility, media attention, strong market performance, and association with charitable initiatives. All these factors have helped to create a sense of legitimacy and excitement around the currency, which has led to its increased adoption and popularity.
    Dogecoin is a digital currency that was created in 2013 as a light-hearted parody of Bitcoin, the world's first cryptocurrency. It was initially intended to be a fun project by its founders, Billy Markus and Jackson Palmer, who aimed to create a cryptocurrency that was easy to use, widely accessible, and had a strong community aspect. Over the years, the popularity of Dogecoin has soared, and it has become one of the most talked-about cryptocurrencies in the market. So, what exactly makes Dogecoin so popular? Firstly, Dogecoin has a strong and active community that is very loyal to the currency. The community is characterized by its friendly and supportive atmosphere, which has led to many memes, inside jokes, and even charitable initiatives. The Dogecoin community has also been instrumental in helping the currency gain traction, with members promoting the currency on social media platforms, online forums, and other online communities. This has helped to increase awareness of the currency and has led to an increase in adoption. Secondly, Dogecoin is very accessible and easy to use. Unlike other cryptocurrencies that require users to have a high level of technical knowledge and expertise, Dogecoin is designed to be user-friendly and approachable. The wallet interface is simple and straightforward, and transactions are fast and easy to process. This has made it an attractive option for people who are new to cryptocurrencies and are looking for a simple way to get started. Thirdly, Dogecoin has received a significant amount of media attention over the years. This has helped to boost its popularity and has led to increased adoption. The currency has been mentioned in various news articles, TV shows, and even by high-profile individuals such as Elon Musk. This exposure has helped to attract new users to the currency and has helped to create a sense of legitimacy around it. Fourthly, Dogecoin has gained popularity as a result of its strong performance in the cryptocurrency market. Although it started out as a joke, Dogecoin's value has skyrocketed in recent years. This has led to many investors and traders seeing it as a viable investment option, leading to an increase in demand for the currency. Lastly, Dogecoin has been associated with several charitable initiatives over the years. For example, in 2014, the Dogecoin community raised funds to help the Jamaican bobsled team get to the Winter Olympics. More recently, the currency has been used to raise money for various charitable causes, such as providing clean water to people in developing countries. This has helped to create a sense of community around the currency and has given people a reason to invest in it beyond just financial gain. In summary, Dogecoin's popularity can be attributed to its strong community, accessibility, media attention, strong market performance, and association with charitable initiatives. All these factors have helped to create a sense of legitimacy and excitement around the currency, which has led to its increased adoption and popularity.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4941 Views

  • PromptPro

    Introduction


    Question
    Are you tired of language models generating repetitive and uninspired responses?

    Just like a musician needs a variety of instruments to create a diverse range of melodies, language models require diverse prompts to generate unique and creative responses.
    Meet Devin, a Generative Prompt Engineer (GPE) who revolutionizes language models by crafting prompts that encourage diverse and dynamic responses.

    "Thanks to Devin's prompt engineering, our language model's responses are more creative and engaging than ever before." - Anissa Thomas

    In this blog post, we'll explore how Generative Prompt Engineering can revolutionize language models and how skilled engineers like Devin can make it happen.
    Ready to take your language model usage to the next level? Keep reading to learn more about the power of Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE).
    Generative Prompt Engineering is a technique used to generate high-quality text using natural language processing (NLP) models.

    Question
    How can we generate more diverse and interesting responses from language models?

    GPE can help by designing prompts that encourage language models to generate more diverse and creative responses. For example, GPE might experiment with using more open-ended prompts, providing more context or background information, or asking more thought-provoking questions.

    The Impact of AI on the Future of Work

    As artificial intelligence continues to advance, its impact on the labor market is becoming increasingly important to consider.

    Diverse and creative responses in language models are critical because they enable the model to produce a range of unique and interesting outputs that are not limited to a single response. Language models that are capable of generating diverse and creative responses have a greater chance of producing outputs that are relevant and engaging to the user, thereby improving the user experience. In this section, we will discuss the importance of diverse and creative responses in language models.
    Avoiding Repetitive Response
    One of the primary benefits of diverse and creative responses in language models is the ability to avoid repetitive responses. Language models that produce the same or similar responses repeatedly can quickly become boring and uninteresting to the user. This can lead to a lack of engagement and a decrease in user satisfaction. By generating diverse and creative responses, language models can keep the user engaged and interested in the conversation.
    Providing a Range of Options
    Another benefit of diverse and creative responses in language models is the ability to provide a range of options to the user. This can be especially useful in situations where the user is looking for information or assistance. For example, a language model that is capable of providing multiple solutions to a problem can help the user find the solution that works best for them. By providing a range of options, language models can also help to build trust with the user by demonstrating that they are capable of providing useful and relevant information.
    Personalization
    Diverse and creative responses in language models can also help to personalize the conversation with the user. By generating responses that are tailored to the user's interests and preferences, language models can create a more engaging and enjoyable conversation. This can also lead to increased user satisfaction and loyalty.
    Enhancing Creativity
    Finally, diverse and creative responses in language models can help to enhance creativity. Language models that are capable of generating unique and interesting responses can inspire the user to think more creatively and explore new ideas. This can be especially useful in situations where the user is looking for inspiration or new perspectives.
    Overall, diverse and creative responses in language models are critical because they can help to avoid repetitive responses, provide a range of options, personalize the conversation, and enhance creativity. By generating unique and interesting responses, language models can keep the user engaged and interested in the conversation, leading to increased user satisfaction and loyalty. As language models continue to evolve, the ability to generate diverse and creative responses will become even more important.

    Why You Should Learn About Generative Prompt Engineering
    Discover how Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create innovative content, save time and costs, personalize your communication with customers, and advance your career.
    Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. The field has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its potential to automate content creation and enable personalized communication with customers. In this blog, we will discuss in detail why you should learn about Generative Prompt Engineering.
    Innovative Content Creation
    Generative Prompt Engineering is an innovative approach to content creation that can help you create unique and engaging content. Unlike traditional content creation methods, which often involve a lot of manual effort, Generative Prompt Engineering can produce a large amount of content in a short amount of time. The content generated through Generative Prompt Engineering can be used for a variety of purposes, including marketing, advertising, and content creation.
    Time and Cost Efficiency
    Generative Prompt Engineering can save you time and money by automating content creation tasks that would otherwise be done manually. This can be especially useful if you work in an industry where content creation is a frequent and time-consuming task. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can produce content faster and at a lower cost, freeing up time and resources to focus on other aspects of your business.
    Personalization
    Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create personalized content tailored to your audience's interests and preferences. Personalization is becoming increasingly important in marketing and advertising as customers expect a more personalized experience. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can create content that is relevant and engaging to your audience, which can lead to increased engagement and customer loyalty.
    Career Opportunities
    Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you stay ahead of the curve and open up new career opportunities. As more businesses start to adopt Generative Prompt Engineering, there will be a growing need for experts who can develop and implement these technologies.
    Advancements in Artificial Intelligence
    Generative Prompt Engineering is a prime example of the advancements being made in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you understand the potential of these technologies and stay up-to-date with the latest developments. As the field continues to evolve, there will be more opportunities to apply these technologies to new areas and industries.
    Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can provide you with a range of benefits, from innovative content creation and time and cost efficiency to personalization, career opportunities, and a better understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning. If you are interested in pursuing a career in the tech industry or looking to enhance your skills, learning about Generative Prompt Engineering is a great place to start.

    Why Generative Prompt Engineering is an Essential Skill for Content Creators

    In a world where content is king, Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create unique, personalized, and engaging content quickly and efficiently.

    Generative Prompt Engineering is an innovative approach to content creation that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. This field is becoming increasingly important as it has the potential to automate content creation and enable personalized communication with customers. Here are some reasons why content creators should learn about Generative Prompt Engineering:
    Creating Unique and Engaging Content
    Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create unique and engaging content that stands out from the competition. With traditional content creation methods, it can be challenging to come up with new and exciting ideas. Generative Prompt Engineering can produce a large amount of content in a short amount of time, allowing you to explore new ideas and produce content that is original and engaging. For example, if you're a social media marketer, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to create unique and eye-catching social media posts that will capture your audience's attention.
    Time and Cost Efficiency in Content Creation
    Generative Prompt Engineering can save you time and money by automating content creation tasks that would otherwise be done manually. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can produce content faster and at a lower cost, freeing up time and resources to focus on other aspects of your business. For example, if you're a blogger, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to generate article topics and outlines, allowing you to spend more time researching and writing the actual content.
    Personalization for Better Customer Engagement
    Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create personalized content tailored to your audience's interests and preferences. Personalization is becoming increasingly important in marketing and advertising as customers expect a more personalized experience. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can create content that is relevant and engaging to your audience, which can lead to increased engagement and customer loyalty. For example, if you're an email marketer, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to generate personalized email subject lines and body text based on the recipient's preferences and behavior.
    Career Opportunities in the Emerging Field of Generative Prompt Engineering
    Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you stay ahead of the curve and make you a valuable asset to any company looking to improve their content creation process. There are a variety of career opportunities in this field, including positions in content creation, marketing, advertising, and technology. For example, companies like OpenAI and GPT-3 are actively seeking talented individuals with skills in Generative Prompt Engineering.
    In full, Generative Prompt Engineering is an essential skill for content creators in today's digital age. It can help you create unique, personalized, and engaging content quickly and efficiently while also providing career opportunities in an emerging field. Whether you're a blogger, social media marketer, or email marketer, learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you take your content creation game to the next level.
    Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. While the field is relatively new, it has its roots in a long history of research and development in natural language processing and machine learning.

    A Moment in Time: Historical Context and Development of Generative Prompt Engineering
    The development of natural language processing can be traced back to the 1950s, when researchers first began experimenting with computer algorithms that could understand and process human language. However, progress in this area was slow, and it wasn't until the 1990s that natural language processing began to gain wider attention and recognition.
    During the 1990s, the focus of natural language processing research shifted towards statistical approaches and machine learning. This led to the development of algorithms that could analyze large datasets of text and identify patterns and relationships between words and phrases. These algorithms were used to build more sophisticated language models, which could be used to generate new text based on existing data.
    In the early 2000s, this approach was further refined with the development of neural language models. These models used artificial neural networks to simulate the way the human brain processes language, and they were able to produce more natural-sounding text than earlier language models. This led to the development of applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, and automated customer service systems.
    However, the text generated by these models was often generic and lacked creativity, leading researchers to explore new ways to generate more engaging and original content. This led to the emergence of Generative Prompt Engineering as a field of study and research.
    Today, Generative Prompt Engineering is an area of active research and development, with new techniques and approaches being developed and tested all the time. One of the most important recent developments has been the use of generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate text. GANs are a type of machine learning algorithm that can generate new text based on a set of prompts, and they are becoming increasingly popular in the field of natural language processing.
    Overall, the historical context and development of Generative Prompt Engineering can be traced back to a long history of research and development in natural language processing and machine learning. The emergence of this field represents a new frontier in creative content generation, and it holds the potential to revolutionize the way we communicate and interact with technology.

    How GPE Can Help in Creating Diverse and Creative Responses
    Designing Prompts for Diverse and Creative Responses in GPE
    The key to generating diverse and creative responses in language models lies in the design of prompts. In this segment, we will discuss how Generative Prompt Engineers (GPE) can design prompts to encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content.
    Understanding the Importance of Prompts
    The first step in designing effective prompts is understanding their importance in generating diverse and creative responses in language models. A prompt serves as a cue or stimulus for the language model to generate content. The quality and specificity of the prompt can greatly influence the type of response the model generates. A well-designed prompt can lead to a range of diverse and creative responses, while a poorly designed prompt may limit the model's output.
    Using Open-Ended Prompts
    Open-ended prompts are a great way to encourage language models to produce diverse and creative responses. These prompts give the model the freedom to generate content without constraints. For example, consider the prompt "Describe your ideal vacation." This prompt allows the language model to generate a variety of responses, from tropical beach getaways to adventurous hiking trips.
    Incorporating Novelty and Surprise
    Incorporating novelty and surprise into prompts can also lead to more diverse and creative responses. This can be achieved by using prompts that are unexpected or unusual. For example, consider the prompt "Write a story about a giraffe who can fly." This prompt introduces an unexpected element that can lead to unique and engaging responses.
    Focusing on Specific Details
    Focusing on specific details in prompts can also encourage language models to generate more diverse and creative responses. Specific details can provide context and constraints for the language model, while still allowing for flexibility and creativity. For example, consider the prompt "Describe a day in the life of a firefighter." This prompt provides specific details about the subject matter, while still allowing for a range of responses.
    Incorporating User Feedback
    Incorporating user feedback can also be a valuable tool in designing effective prompts. User feedback can help GPEs understand what types of prompts lead to the most diverse and creative responses. For example, a GPE can analyze user responses to a set of prompts and use that information to refine and improve their prompt design in the future.
    In full, effective prompt design is crucial for generating diverse and creative responses in language models. By using open-ended prompts, incorporating novelty and surprise, focusing on specific details, and incorporating user feedback, GPEs can design prompts that encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content.

    Techniques for designing effective prompts in Generative Prompt Engineering
    By using open-ended prompts, contextual prompts, and thought-provoking questions, Generative Prompt Engineers can encourage language models to generate diverse and creative responses that can be used for a variety of purposes, including marketing, content creation, and personal communication.
    In order to generate diverse and creative responses, Generative Prompt Engineers employ a variety of techniques to design prompts that encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content. Here are some examples of techniques that are commonly used.
    Open-Ended Prompts
    One technique that Generative Prompt Engineers use is to create open-ended prompts. These prompts encourage language models to generate responses that are not limited by a specific set of parameters. By giving the model more freedom to explore different possibilities, the resulting content can be more diverse and creative. For example, an open-ended prompt might ask the model to generate a story that begins with the phrase "Once upon a time."
    Contextual Prompts
    Another technique that can be effective is to provide more context in the prompt. This can help guide the language model towards a specific topic or idea while still allowing for creativity. For instance, a prompt asking the model to generate a recipe for a vegan chili would provide more context than simply asking for a recipe, which could lead to a wider range of responses.
    Thought-Provoking Questions
    Generative Prompt Engineers can also design prompts that provoke thought and inspire the language model to generate more unique and interesting responses. These types of prompts can be especially effective in generating content that is engaging and thought-provoking for the audience. For example, a prompt asking the model to generate a conversation between two characters who have just met on a deserted island could lead to a range of creative responses that explore themes such as survival, isolation, and human connection.
    Key Skills for a Generative Prompt Engineer
    The ideal candidate for this role will have a strong technical background, excellent problem-solving skills, and the ability to work both independently and as part of a team. Additionally, excellent communication, organization, and time management skills are crucial in order to ensure projects are completed on time and on budget.
    Technical Background
    A Generative Prompt Engineer must have a strong technical background in natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python. Understanding the fundamentals of these fields is essential for designing effective prompts and developing high-quality models. Familiarity with software development tools and platforms is also important for creating and testing models.
    Problem-Solving Skills
    Problem-solving skills are critical for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they must be able to identify and address issues that arise during the model development process. They must also be able to analyze data and adjust models to improve their performance. Strong problem-solving skills allow a Generative Prompt Engineer to create models that are accurate, efficient, and effective.
    Communication
    Effective communication is crucial for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they often work as part of a team that includes developers, designers, and other stakeholders. Clear communication helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. Additionally, communicating technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders is essential for gaining buy-in and support for projects.
    Organization
    A Generative Prompt Engineer must be highly organized, as they are often working on multiple projects simultaneously. They must be able to prioritize tasks and manage their time effectively to meet deadlines and ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget. Strong organizational skills allow a Generative Prompt Engineer to be efficient and effective in their work.
    Time Management
    Time management is essential for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they must balance multiple competing priorities and deadlines. Effective time management allows them to ensure that they are meeting deadlines, managing their workload, and delivering high-quality work. It also helps them to stay on top of emerging trends and technologies, which is critical in this rapidly evolving field.
    Overall, A Generative Prompt Engineer requires a diverse skill set that includes technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills. These skills are essential for developing and implementing effective models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses.
    The Importance of Language Skills in Generative Prompt Engineering
    Parsing, Syntax, and Grammar Skills

    Tip
    Language skills, including parsing, syntax, and grammar, are essential for creating effective prompts in Generative Prompt Engineering, enabling the generation of diverse and creative responses."

    Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE) is an interdisciplinary field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. As we discussed earlier, GPE is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. While technical background, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills are important in this field, language skills are also key to success.
    In this section, we will discuss the importance of parsing, syntax, and grammar skills in GPE. These language skills are essential for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses.
    Parsing Skills
    Parsing refers to the process of analyzing a sentence to understand its grammatical structure. In GPE, understanding the grammatical structure of a prompt can help the engineer create prompts that are grammatically correct and easy for the language model to understand. For example, consider the prompt "The cat sat on the mat." By parsing this sentence, a GPE can identify the subject ("the cat"), the verb ("sat"), and the object ("the mat"). This understanding can then be used to create similar prompts that are grammatically correct and easy for the language model to understand.
    Syntax Skills
    Syntax refers to the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences. In GPE, understanding syntax is important for creating prompts that are clear and easy to understand. For example, consider the prompt "Write a story about a man with a dog who goes on an adventure." By using proper syntax, a GPE can create a clear and concise prompt that is easy for the language model to understand and generate a creative response.
    Grammar Skills
    Grammar refers to the rules that govern the use of language. In GPE, understanding grammar is important for creating prompts that are grammatically correct and use proper word choice. For example, consider the prompt "Write a poem about nature." By using proper grammar, a GPE can create a prompt that is clear and easy for the language model to understand, while also encouraging the generation of a creative and engaging response.

    Language skills play a critical role in Generative Prompt Engineering as they enable GPEs to create effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses. Parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are particularly important for GPEs as they enable them to create prompts that are grammatically correct, clear, and easy for the language model to understand.
    These language skills also allow GPEs to identify and address any issues that may arise during the model development process. For example, if a language model generates responses that are not grammatically correct or do not make sense, a GPE can use their parsing, syntax, and grammar skills to identify the issue and adjust the model accordingly.
    Furthermore, language skills are essential for creating prompts that are engaging and thought-provoking. By using proper grammar and syntax, GPEs can create prompts that are clear and easy to understand, while also encouraging the generation of creative and engaging responses. For example, a prompt like "Write a story about a man with a dog who goes on an adventure" is more engaging and thought-provoking than a prompt like "Write a story about a man who goes on an adventure."
    Lastly, language skills are crucial for GPEs to create effective prompts and ensure the successful completion of projects on time and within budget. By having strong parsing, syntax, and grammar skills, GPEs can create prompts that are grammatically correct, clear, and engaging, which in turn results in the generation of diverse and creative responses.
    By combining technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills, GPEs can effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget. Additionally, language skills such as parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are crucial for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses, which is a key component of GPE.


    Example
    Let's say a GPE is working on a project to develop a chatbot that can provide customer service for an e-commerce platform. The GPE would need to have a strong technical background in natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python to design effective prompts and develop high-quality models that can accurately understand customer queries and provide helpful responses.

    As the GPE works on the project, they may encounter issues such as poor model performance, data quality issues, or unexpected user behavior. Strong problem-solving skills are crucial in such situations as they allow the GPE to quickly identify and address the issues, keeping the project on track and minimizing delays.
    Effective communication is also critical for the success of the project. The GPE would need to communicate clearly and effectively with other team members, stakeholders, and clients to ensure everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. This would reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings or miscommunication that can lead to project delays or cost overruns. Additionally, clear communication of technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders is essential for gaining their buy-in and support for the project, which can help to secure adequate resources and funding.
    As the GPE works on multiple projects simultaneously, effective organization skills would enable them to prioritize tasks and manage their time effectively to meet deadlines and ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget. Good time management skills would help them balance competing priorities and deadlines, allowing them to stay on top of emerging trends and technologies that are critical in this rapidly evolving field.
    In full, the combination of technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills is crucial for a GPE to effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget. Language skills such as parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are also important for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses, which is a key component of GPE.

    The Role of a Generative Prompt Engineer
    I'm a skilled Generative Prompt Engineer with a technical background and exceptional problem-solving abilities. My organization, communication, and time management skills set me apart, allowing me to thrive both independently and as part of a team.
    What makes me particularly effective is my ability to parse the English language using my knowledge and understanding of syntax and grammar. These tools enable me to craft prompts rapidly and with efficiency, getting swiftly to the heart of the project requirements.
    My experience with technical planning and communicating complex requirements make me particularly adept at outlining project scope, goals, and requirements for clients and team members. I'm tenacious when it comes to developing and testing new software and systems, using customer feedback and data to drive iterative improvements.
    Collaboration is key for me, and I'm able to communicate effectively and work well with multiple stakeholders, guiding them through the process and keeping them updated as the project evolves. Lastly, staying at the forefront of tech and AI advancements is of utmost importance to me to ensure that I always offer the best solutions to clients.
    As a Generative Prompt Engineer, I am skilled in quickly and effectively creating prompts with precision and accuracy. My extensive knowledge of English parsing, syntax, and grammar is instrumental in crafting prompts that are efficient and effective. By understanding the intricacies of language, I am able to ensure that my prompts are grammatically sound and convey the intended meaning.
    Additionally, my attention to detail and analytical skills allow me to identify patterns and generate unique and diverse prompts. I am also proficient in using natural language processing tools and techniques to aid in prompt creation. Overall, my skills and expertise make me a valuable asset in the development of intelligent and dynamic prompt systems.
    Ultimately, my skills and experience as a Generative Prompt Engineer make me a valuable asset to any team looking to implement intelligent and dynamic prompt systems. With my technical expertise, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills, I can help clients and team members meet their project goals efficiently and effectively. If you are seeking a Generative Prompt Engineer with a passion for language and a dedication to staying at the forefront of technology, look no further than me.

    The Importance of English Parsing, Syntax, and Grammar in Crafting Effective Prompts

    English parsing, syntax, and grammar are instrumental in crafting effective prompts that resonate with a target audience. With the help of NLP technology, writers can use these tools to generate marketing copy that achieves desired results.

    Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a powerful tool that can be used to analyze and generate human language. As an avid user of NLP technology, I have utilized its intelligent algorithms to assist me in writing two books. NLP technology has helped me streamline my writing process, improve my prose, and develop a unique voice. Now, I plan to leverage its capabilities once again to create a marketing campaign that will wow my audience.
    Effective prompts are essential for any marketing campaign. They need to be carefully crafted to resonate with the target audience and achieve the desired results. English parsing, syntax, and grammar are critical components of creating effective prompts. Parsing is the process of breaking down a sentence into its component parts to understand its meaning. Syntax refers to the rules for constructing phrases and sentences in a language, while grammar is the set of rules for using language correctly.
    By utilizing NLP technology, writers can use these tools to analyze and understand the language used by their target audience. This allows them to craft compelling marketing copy that resonates with their audience and achieves the desired results. NLP technology can even help generate language that is unique, creative, and effective.
    In my personal experience, NLP technology has been instrumental in improving my writing process, allowing me to create unique and compelling content that resonates with my readers. It has also helped me in crafting marketing copy that achieves my desired results. By leveraging the power of NLP technology and these essential language tools, writers can create effective prompts that generate high-quality, diverse, and creative responses.

    The Role of Analytical Skills and Attention to Detail in Writing Books and Crafting Marketing Campaigns
    Analytical skills and attention to detail are crucial in crafting effective writing, whether it be in the form of a book or a marketing campaign. These skills allow the writer to identify patterns, discern important information, and generate unique and diverse prompts that resonate with the intended audience.
    In writing the two books, the use of analytical skills and attention to detail helped in developing the plot, identifying plot holes, and creating well-rounded characters. Analyzing character motivations, for example, helped to ensure that each character's actions and decisions were consistent and believable throughout the book. Attention to detail also aided in creating vivid descriptions of the setting, immersing the reader in the story and bringing the fictional world to life.
    Similarly, in crafting the marketing campaign, analytical skills and attention to detail played a crucial role in developing a message that resonates with the target audience. Analyzing market trends, consumer behavior, and demographics helped to ensure that the campaign message was tailored to the specific needs and interests of the target audience. Attention to detail was also important in creating effective prompts that engaged the audience and generated interest in the product or service being marketed.
    In both cases, the use of analytical skills and attention to detail helped to create writing that was engaging, informative, and effective in achieving its intended purpose.
    Conclusion
    Generative Prompt Engineers (GPEs) are instrumental in revolutionizing language models by creating diverse and creative responses. With their technical knowledge of natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python, GPEs can design effective prompts and develop high-quality models that can accurately understand customer queries and provide helpful responses.
    GPEs also need strong problem-solving skills to quickly identify and address issues such as poor model performance, data quality issues, or unexpected user behavior, keeping the project on track and minimizing delays. Effective communication is also critical for the success of the project, as GPEs need to communicate clearly and effectively with other team members, stakeholders, and clients to ensure everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals.
    In addition to technical knowledge and communication skills, GPEs also need strong analytical skills and attention to detail to identify patterns and generate unique and diverse prompts. This is essential for creating effective prompts that can generate compelling marketing copy, resonate with the target audience, and achieve desired results.
    Overall, the combination of technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, time management skills, and analytical skills is crucial for a GPE to effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse, and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget.
    Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE) has numerous implications and applications in various fields. Here are some of them:

    Language Generation: GPE can revolutionize language generation by creating more diverse and creative responses to prompts. It can be applied in chatbots, virtual assistants, customer service, and other natural language processing (NLP) applications.
    Creative Writing: GPE can help writers develop their unique writing voice, streamline their writing process, and generate new ideas. It can be used to create different types of content, including novels, screenplays, and marketing copy.
    Marketing: GPE can be applied in marketing to craft compelling and persuasive messages that resonate with the target audience. It can help create unique and diverse copy that grabs the audience's attention and drives conversions.
    Education: GPE can be used in education to generate questions and responses for quizzes, exams, and homework assignments. It can help create personalized learning experiences for students and provide them with immediate feedback.
    Data Analysis: GPE can be applied in data analysis to generate natural language summaries of data and insights. It can help automate data reporting and make it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand complex data.
    Content Creation: GPE can be applied in content creation to generate content for websites, blogs, and social media. It can help generate diverse and creative content that engages the audience and drives traffic.
    Personalization: GPE can help create personalized experiences for users by generating tailored responses based on their preferences and past interactions.

    One thing's for sure, Generative Prompt Engineering has significant implications and applications in language generation, creative writing, marketing, education, data analysis, content creation, and personalization. Its potential applications are vast, and it has the potential to transform many industries and fields.
    I hope this discussion on Generative Prompt Engineering has inspired you to think about the power of natural language processing and the potential for creating diverse and creative responses. As you reflect on this topic, I challenge you to consider how you can apply this knowledge to your own lifescape.
    Perhaps you can take some time to refresh your language and analytical skills, exploring new vocabulary and grammatical structures to improve your own communication. Or maybe you can explore the potential for using natural language processing to improve your own business, writing, or creative projects.
    Whatever path you choose, I encourage you to take action and apply your learning to make a positive impact in your life and in the world around you. Let's harness the power of technology and language to create something truly remarkable.
    If you're feeling inspired by what you just read, don't just sit there, take action! Leave your comments, give me an upvote, and hit that follow button to stay tuned in for more content that'll uplift your soul. And if you're new to #hive and #ecency, don't worry, sign up is free and easy. Just click the link in the description and you'll be ready to go.
    But wait, there's more! If you want to help me out and support my somewhat ok posts, you can make a donation to help me with free giveaways, contests, and airdrops. You can upvote, comment, follow/subscribe, and share on different social media platforms like [HIVE, PublishOx, Medium, Reddit,](<HIVE, PublishOx, Medium, Reddit, or other social media platforms.>) and more. The quickest methods of donation are Cash.App and PayPal, and your contributions and gifts are greatly appreciated.
    And hey, I'm not just here to inspire you, I'm here to learn too. I'm looking for advice to help me create new communities on Hive and other platforms, and I need your help. So if you've got some great ideas, or just want to help me pay it forward, hit me up with a tip or two and let's keep making the world a better place.

    Disclaimer
    Please note that the above-provided information is for general educational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice. It is always best to check with a licensed professional before making any decisions regarding your professional life.
    PromptPro Introduction Question Are you tired of language models generating repetitive and uninspired responses? Just like a musician needs a variety of instruments to create a diverse range of melodies, language models require diverse prompts to generate unique and creative responses. Meet Devin, a Generative Prompt Engineer (GPE) who revolutionizes language models by crafting prompts that encourage diverse and dynamic responses. "Thanks to Devin's prompt engineering, our language model's responses are more creative and engaging than ever before." - Anissa Thomas In this blog post, we'll explore how Generative Prompt Engineering can revolutionize language models and how skilled engineers like Devin can make it happen. Ready to take your language model usage to the next level? Keep reading to learn more about the power of Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE). Generative Prompt Engineering is a technique used to generate high-quality text using natural language processing (NLP) models. Question How can we generate more diverse and interesting responses from language models? GPE can help by designing prompts that encourage language models to generate more diverse and creative responses. For example, GPE might experiment with using more open-ended prompts, providing more context or background information, or asking more thought-provoking questions. The Impact of AI on the Future of Work As artificial intelligence continues to advance, its impact on the labor market is becoming increasingly important to consider. Diverse and creative responses in language models are critical because they enable the model to produce a range of unique and interesting outputs that are not limited to a single response. Language models that are capable of generating diverse and creative responses have a greater chance of producing outputs that are relevant and engaging to the user, thereby improving the user experience. In this section, we will discuss the importance of diverse and creative responses in language models. Avoiding Repetitive Response One of the primary benefits of diverse and creative responses in language models is the ability to avoid repetitive responses. Language models that produce the same or similar responses repeatedly can quickly become boring and uninteresting to the user. This can lead to a lack of engagement and a decrease in user satisfaction. By generating diverse and creative responses, language models can keep the user engaged and interested in the conversation. Providing a Range of Options Another benefit of diverse and creative responses in language models is the ability to provide a range of options to the user. This can be especially useful in situations where the user is looking for information or assistance. For example, a language model that is capable of providing multiple solutions to a problem can help the user find the solution that works best for them. By providing a range of options, language models can also help to build trust with the user by demonstrating that they are capable of providing useful and relevant information. Personalization Diverse and creative responses in language models can also help to personalize the conversation with the user. By generating responses that are tailored to the user's interests and preferences, language models can create a more engaging and enjoyable conversation. This can also lead to increased user satisfaction and loyalty. Enhancing Creativity Finally, diverse and creative responses in language models can help to enhance creativity. Language models that are capable of generating unique and interesting responses can inspire the user to think more creatively and explore new ideas. This can be especially useful in situations where the user is looking for inspiration or new perspectives. Overall, diverse and creative responses in language models are critical because they can help to avoid repetitive responses, provide a range of options, personalize the conversation, and enhance creativity. By generating unique and interesting responses, language models can keep the user engaged and interested in the conversation, leading to increased user satisfaction and loyalty. As language models continue to evolve, the ability to generate diverse and creative responses will become even more important. Why You Should Learn About Generative Prompt Engineering Discover how Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create innovative content, save time and costs, personalize your communication with customers, and advance your career. Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. The field has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its potential to automate content creation and enable personalized communication with customers. In this blog, we will discuss in detail why you should learn about Generative Prompt Engineering. Innovative Content Creation Generative Prompt Engineering is an innovative approach to content creation that can help you create unique and engaging content. Unlike traditional content creation methods, which often involve a lot of manual effort, Generative Prompt Engineering can produce a large amount of content in a short amount of time. The content generated through Generative Prompt Engineering can be used for a variety of purposes, including marketing, advertising, and content creation. Time and Cost Efficiency Generative Prompt Engineering can save you time and money by automating content creation tasks that would otherwise be done manually. This can be especially useful if you work in an industry where content creation is a frequent and time-consuming task. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can produce content faster and at a lower cost, freeing up time and resources to focus on other aspects of your business. Personalization Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create personalized content tailored to your audience's interests and preferences. Personalization is becoming increasingly important in marketing and advertising as customers expect a more personalized experience. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can create content that is relevant and engaging to your audience, which can lead to increased engagement and customer loyalty. Career Opportunities Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you stay ahead of the curve and open up new career opportunities. As more businesses start to adopt Generative Prompt Engineering, there will be a growing need for experts who can develop and implement these technologies. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence Generative Prompt Engineering is a prime example of the advancements being made in artificial intelligence and machine learning. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you understand the potential of these technologies and stay up-to-date with the latest developments. As the field continues to evolve, there will be more opportunities to apply these technologies to new areas and industries. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can provide you with a range of benefits, from innovative content creation and time and cost efficiency to personalization, career opportunities, and a better understanding of artificial intelligence and machine learning. If you are interested in pursuing a career in the tech industry or looking to enhance your skills, learning about Generative Prompt Engineering is a great place to start. Why Generative Prompt Engineering is an Essential Skill for Content Creators In a world where content is king, Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create unique, personalized, and engaging content quickly and efficiently. Generative Prompt Engineering is an innovative approach to content creation that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. This field is becoming increasingly important as it has the potential to automate content creation and enable personalized communication with customers. Here are some reasons why content creators should learn about Generative Prompt Engineering: Creating Unique and Engaging Content Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create unique and engaging content that stands out from the competition. With traditional content creation methods, it can be challenging to come up with new and exciting ideas. Generative Prompt Engineering can produce a large amount of content in a short amount of time, allowing you to explore new ideas and produce content that is original and engaging. For example, if you're a social media marketer, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to create unique and eye-catching social media posts that will capture your audience's attention. Time and Cost Efficiency in Content Creation Generative Prompt Engineering can save you time and money by automating content creation tasks that would otherwise be done manually. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can produce content faster and at a lower cost, freeing up time and resources to focus on other aspects of your business. For example, if you're a blogger, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to generate article topics and outlines, allowing you to spend more time researching and writing the actual content. Personalization for Better Customer Engagement Generative Prompt Engineering can help you create personalized content tailored to your audience's interests and preferences. Personalization is becoming increasingly important in marketing and advertising as customers expect a more personalized experience. With Generative Prompt Engineering, you can create content that is relevant and engaging to your audience, which can lead to increased engagement and customer loyalty. For example, if you're an email marketer, you can use Generative Prompt Engineering to generate personalized email subject lines and body text based on the recipient's preferences and behavior. Career Opportunities in the Emerging Field of Generative Prompt Engineering Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. Learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you stay ahead of the curve and make you a valuable asset to any company looking to improve their content creation process. There are a variety of career opportunities in this field, including positions in content creation, marketing, advertising, and technology. For example, companies like OpenAI and GPT-3 are actively seeking talented individuals with skills in Generative Prompt Engineering. In full, Generative Prompt Engineering is an essential skill for content creators in today's digital age. It can help you create unique, personalized, and engaging content quickly and efficiently while also providing career opportunities in an emerging field. Whether you're a blogger, social media marketer, or email marketer, learning about Generative Prompt Engineering can help you take your content creation game to the next level. Generative Prompt Engineering is an emerging field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. While the field is relatively new, it has its roots in a long history of research and development in natural language processing and machine learning. A Moment in Time: Historical Context and Development of Generative Prompt Engineering The development of natural language processing can be traced back to the 1950s, when researchers first began experimenting with computer algorithms that could understand and process human language. However, progress in this area was slow, and it wasn't until the 1990s that natural language processing began to gain wider attention and recognition. During the 1990s, the focus of natural language processing research shifted towards statistical approaches and machine learning. This led to the development of algorithms that could analyze large datasets of text and identify patterns and relationships between words and phrases. These algorithms were used to build more sophisticated language models, which could be used to generate new text based on existing data. In the early 2000s, this approach was further refined with the development of neural language models. These models used artificial neural networks to simulate the way the human brain processes language, and they were able to produce more natural-sounding text than earlier language models. This led to the development of applications like chatbots, virtual assistants, and automated customer service systems. However, the text generated by these models was often generic and lacked creativity, leading researchers to explore new ways to generate more engaging and original content. This led to the emergence of Generative Prompt Engineering as a field of study and research. Today, Generative Prompt Engineering is an area of active research and development, with new techniques and approaches being developed and tested all the time. One of the most important recent developments has been the use of generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate text. GANs are a type of machine learning algorithm that can generate new text based on a set of prompts, and they are becoming increasingly popular in the field of natural language processing. Overall, the historical context and development of Generative Prompt Engineering can be traced back to a long history of research and development in natural language processing and machine learning. The emergence of this field represents a new frontier in creative content generation, and it holds the potential to revolutionize the way we communicate and interact with technology. How GPE Can Help in Creating Diverse and Creative Responses Designing Prompts for Diverse and Creative Responses in GPE The key to generating diverse and creative responses in language models lies in the design of prompts. In this segment, we will discuss how Generative Prompt Engineers (GPE) can design prompts to encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content. Understanding the Importance of Prompts The first step in designing effective prompts is understanding their importance in generating diverse and creative responses in language models. A prompt serves as a cue or stimulus for the language model to generate content. The quality and specificity of the prompt can greatly influence the type of response the model generates. A well-designed prompt can lead to a range of diverse and creative responses, while a poorly designed prompt may limit the model's output. Using Open-Ended Prompts Open-ended prompts are a great way to encourage language models to produce diverse and creative responses. These prompts give the model the freedom to generate content without constraints. For example, consider the prompt "Describe your ideal vacation." This prompt allows the language model to generate a variety of responses, from tropical beach getaways to adventurous hiking trips. Incorporating Novelty and Surprise Incorporating novelty and surprise into prompts can also lead to more diverse and creative responses. This can be achieved by using prompts that are unexpected or unusual. For example, consider the prompt "Write a story about a giraffe who can fly." This prompt introduces an unexpected element that can lead to unique and engaging responses. Focusing on Specific Details Focusing on specific details in prompts can also encourage language models to generate more diverse and creative responses. Specific details can provide context and constraints for the language model, while still allowing for flexibility and creativity. For example, consider the prompt "Describe a day in the life of a firefighter." This prompt provides specific details about the subject matter, while still allowing for a range of responses. Incorporating User Feedback Incorporating user feedback can also be a valuable tool in designing effective prompts. User feedback can help GPEs understand what types of prompts lead to the most diverse and creative responses. For example, a GPE can analyze user responses to a set of prompts and use that information to refine and improve their prompt design in the future. In full, effective prompt design is crucial for generating diverse and creative responses in language models. By using open-ended prompts, incorporating novelty and surprise, focusing on specific details, and incorporating user feedback, GPEs can design prompts that encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content. Techniques for designing effective prompts in Generative Prompt Engineering By using open-ended prompts, contextual prompts, and thought-provoking questions, Generative Prompt Engineers can encourage language models to generate diverse and creative responses that can be used for a variety of purposes, including marketing, content creation, and personal communication. In order to generate diverse and creative responses, Generative Prompt Engineers employ a variety of techniques to design prompts that encourage language models to produce unique and engaging content. Here are some examples of techniques that are commonly used. Open-Ended Prompts One technique that Generative Prompt Engineers use is to create open-ended prompts. These prompts encourage language models to generate responses that are not limited by a specific set of parameters. By giving the model more freedom to explore different possibilities, the resulting content can be more diverse and creative. For example, an open-ended prompt might ask the model to generate a story that begins with the phrase "Once upon a time." Contextual Prompts Another technique that can be effective is to provide more context in the prompt. This can help guide the language model towards a specific topic or idea while still allowing for creativity. For instance, a prompt asking the model to generate a recipe for a vegan chili would provide more context than simply asking for a recipe, which could lead to a wider range of responses. Thought-Provoking Questions Generative Prompt Engineers can also design prompts that provoke thought and inspire the language model to generate more unique and interesting responses. These types of prompts can be especially effective in generating content that is engaging and thought-provoking for the audience. For example, a prompt asking the model to generate a conversation between two characters who have just met on a deserted island could lead to a range of creative responses that explore themes such as survival, isolation, and human connection. Key Skills for a Generative Prompt Engineer The ideal candidate for this role will have a strong technical background, excellent problem-solving skills, and the ability to work both independently and as part of a team. Additionally, excellent communication, organization, and time management skills are crucial in order to ensure projects are completed on time and on budget. Technical Background A Generative Prompt Engineer must have a strong technical background in natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python. Understanding the fundamentals of these fields is essential for designing effective prompts and developing high-quality models. Familiarity with software development tools and platforms is also important for creating and testing models. Problem-Solving Skills Problem-solving skills are critical for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they must be able to identify and address issues that arise during the model development process. They must also be able to analyze data and adjust models to improve their performance. Strong problem-solving skills allow a Generative Prompt Engineer to create models that are accurate, efficient, and effective. Communication Effective communication is crucial for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they often work as part of a team that includes developers, designers, and other stakeholders. Clear communication helps to ensure that everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. Additionally, communicating technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders is essential for gaining buy-in and support for projects. Organization A Generative Prompt Engineer must be highly organized, as they are often working on multiple projects simultaneously. They must be able to prioritize tasks and manage their time effectively to meet deadlines and ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget. Strong organizational skills allow a Generative Prompt Engineer to be efficient and effective in their work. Time Management Time management is essential for a Generative Prompt Engineer, as they must balance multiple competing priorities and deadlines. Effective time management allows them to ensure that they are meeting deadlines, managing their workload, and delivering high-quality work. It also helps them to stay on top of emerging trends and technologies, which is critical in this rapidly evolving field. Overall, A Generative Prompt Engineer requires a diverse skill set that includes technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills. These skills are essential for developing and implementing effective models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses. The Importance of Language Skills in Generative Prompt Engineering Parsing, Syntax, and Grammar Skills Tip Language skills, including parsing, syntax, and grammar, are essential for creating effective prompts in Generative Prompt Engineering, enabling the generation of diverse and creative responses." Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE) is an interdisciplinary field that combines natural language processing, machine learning, and creativity to generate new and original content based on prompts or cues. As we discussed earlier, GPE is an emerging field with a growing demand for skilled professionals. While technical background, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills are important in this field, language skills are also key to success. In this section, we will discuss the importance of parsing, syntax, and grammar skills in GPE. These language skills are essential for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses. Parsing Skills Parsing refers to the process of analyzing a sentence to understand its grammatical structure. In GPE, understanding the grammatical structure of a prompt can help the engineer create prompts that are grammatically correct and easy for the language model to understand. For example, consider the prompt "The cat sat on the mat." By parsing this sentence, a GPE can identify the subject ("the cat"), the verb ("sat"), and the object ("the mat"). This understanding can then be used to create similar prompts that are grammatically correct and easy for the language model to understand. Syntax Skills Syntax refers to the arrangement of words and phrases to create well-formed sentences. In GPE, understanding syntax is important for creating prompts that are clear and easy to understand. For example, consider the prompt "Write a story about a man with a dog who goes on an adventure." By using proper syntax, a GPE can create a clear and concise prompt that is easy for the language model to understand and generate a creative response. Grammar Skills Grammar refers to the rules that govern the use of language. In GPE, understanding grammar is important for creating prompts that are grammatically correct and use proper word choice. For example, consider the prompt "Write a poem about nature." By using proper grammar, a GPE can create a prompt that is clear and easy for the language model to understand, while also encouraging the generation of a creative and engaging response. Language skills play a critical role in Generative Prompt Engineering as they enable GPEs to create effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses. Parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are particularly important for GPEs as they enable them to create prompts that are grammatically correct, clear, and easy for the language model to understand. These language skills also allow GPEs to identify and address any issues that may arise during the model development process. For example, if a language model generates responses that are not grammatically correct or do not make sense, a GPE can use their parsing, syntax, and grammar skills to identify the issue and adjust the model accordingly. Furthermore, language skills are essential for creating prompts that are engaging and thought-provoking. By using proper grammar and syntax, GPEs can create prompts that are clear and easy to understand, while also encouraging the generation of creative and engaging responses. For example, a prompt like "Write a story about a man with a dog who goes on an adventure" is more engaging and thought-provoking than a prompt like "Write a story about a man who goes on an adventure." Lastly, language skills are crucial for GPEs to create effective prompts and ensure the successful completion of projects on time and within budget. By having strong parsing, syntax, and grammar skills, GPEs can create prompts that are grammatically correct, clear, and engaging, which in turn results in the generation of diverse and creative responses. By combining technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills, GPEs can effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget. Additionally, language skills such as parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are crucial for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses, which is a key component of GPE. Example Let's say a GPE is working on a project to develop a chatbot that can provide customer service for an e-commerce platform. The GPE would need to have a strong technical background in natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python to design effective prompts and develop high-quality models that can accurately understand customer queries and provide helpful responses. As the GPE works on the project, they may encounter issues such as poor model performance, data quality issues, or unexpected user behavior. Strong problem-solving skills are crucial in such situations as they allow the GPE to quickly identify and address the issues, keeping the project on track and minimizing delays. Effective communication is also critical for the success of the project. The GPE would need to communicate clearly and effectively with other team members, stakeholders, and clients to ensure everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. This would reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings or miscommunication that can lead to project delays or cost overruns. Additionally, clear communication of technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders is essential for gaining their buy-in and support for the project, which can help to secure adequate resources and funding. As the GPE works on multiple projects simultaneously, effective organization skills would enable them to prioritize tasks and manage their time effectively to meet deadlines and ensure that projects are completed on time and within budget. Good time management skills would help them balance competing priorities and deadlines, allowing them to stay on top of emerging trends and technologies that are critical in this rapidly evolving field. In full, the combination of technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, and time management skills is crucial for a GPE to effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget. Language skills such as parsing, syntax, and grammar skills are also important for creating effective prompts that can generate diverse and creative responses, which is a key component of GPE. The Role of a Generative Prompt Engineer I'm a skilled Generative Prompt Engineer with a technical background and exceptional problem-solving abilities. My organization, communication, and time management skills set me apart, allowing me to thrive both independently and as part of a team. What makes me particularly effective is my ability to parse the English language using my knowledge and understanding of syntax and grammar. These tools enable me to craft prompts rapidly and with efficiency, getting swiftly to the heart of the project requirements. My experience with technical planning and communicating complex requirements make me particularly adept at outlining project scope, goals, and requirements for clients and team members. I'm tenacious when it comes to developing and testing new software and systems, using customer feedback and data to drive iterative improvements. Collaboration is key for me, and I'm able to communicate effectively and work well with multiple stakeholders, guiding them through the process and keeping them updated as the project evolves. Lastly, staying at the forefront of tech and AI advancements is of utmost importance to me to ensure that I always offer the best solutions to clients. As a Generative Prompt Engineer, I am skilled in quickly and effectively creating prompts with precision and accuracy. My extensive knowledge of English parsing, syntax, and grammar is instrumental in crafting prompts that are efficient and effective. By understanding the intricacies of language, I am able to ensure that my prompts are grammatically sound and convey the intended meaning. Additionally, my attention to detail and analytical skills allow me to identify patterns and generate unique and diverse prompts. I am also proficient in using natural language processing tools and techniques to aid in prompt creation. Overall, my skills and expertise make me a valuable asset in the development of intelligent and dynamic prompt systems. Ultimately, my skills and experience as a Generative Prompt Engineer make me a valuable asset to any team looking to implement intelligent and dynamic prompt systems. With my technical expertise, problem-solving abilities, and communication skills, I can help clients and team members meet their project goals efficiently and effectively. If you are seeking a Generative Prompt Engineer with a passion for language and a dedication to staying at the forefront of technology, look no further than me. The Importance of English Parsing, Syntax, and Grammar in Crafting Effective Prompts English parsing, syntax, and grammar are instrumental in crafting effective prompts that resonate with a target audience. With the help of NLP technology, writers can use these tools to generate marketing copy that achieves desired results. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a powerful tool that can be used to analyze and generate human language. As an avid user of NLP technology, I have utilized its intelligent algorithms to assist me in writing two books. NLP technology has helped me streamline my writing process, improve my prose, and develop a unique voice. Now, I plan to leverage its capabilities once again to create a marketing campaign that will wow my audience. Effective prompts are essential for any marketing campaign. They need to be carefully crafted to resonate with the target audience and achieve the desired results. English parsing, syntax, and grammar are critical components of creating effective prompts. Parsing is the process of breaking down a sentence into its component parts to understand its meaning. Syntax refers to the rules for constructing phrases and sentences in a language, while grammar is the set of rules for using language correctly. By utilizing NLP technology, writers can use these tools to analyze and understand the language used by their target audience. This allows them to craft compelling marketing copy that resonates with their audience and achieves the desired results. NLP technology can even help generate language that is unique, creative, and effective. In my personal experience, NLP technology has been instrumental in improving my writing process, allowing me to create unique and compelling content that resonates with my readers. It has also helped me in crafting marketing copy that achieves my desired results. By leveraging the power of NLP technology and these essential language tools, writers can create effective prompts that generate high-quality, diverse, and creative responses. The Role of Analytical Skills and Attention to Detail in Writing Books and Crafting Marketing Campaigns Analytical skills and attention to detail are crucial in crafting effective writing, whether it be in the form of a book or a marketing campaign. These skills allow the writer to identify patterns, discern important information, and generate unique and diverse prompts that resonate with the intended audience. In writing the two books, the use of analytical skills and attention to detail helped in developing the plot, identifying plot holes, and creating well-rounded characters. Analyzing character motivations, for example, helped to ensure that each character's actions and decisions were consistent and believable throughout the book. Attention to detail also aided in creating vivid descriptions of the setting, immersing the reader in the story and bringing the fictional world to life. Similarly, in crafting the marketing campaign, analytical skills and attention to detail played a crucial role in developing a message that resonates with the target audience. Analyzing market trends, consumer behavior, and demographics helped to ensure that the campaign message was tailored to the specific needs and interests of the target audience. Attention to detail was also important in creating effective prompts that engaged the audience and generated interest in the product or service being marketed. In both cases, the use of analytical skills and attention to detail helped to create writing that was engaging, informative, and effective in achieving its intended purpose. Conclusion Generative Prompt Engineers (GPEs) are instrumental in revolutionizing language models by creating diverse and creative responses. With their technical knowledge of natural language processing, machine learning, and programming languages such as Python, GPEs can design effective prompts and develop high-quality models that can accurately understand customer queries and provide helpful responses. GPEs also need strong problem-solving skills to quickly identify and address issues such as poor model performance, data quality issues, or unexpected user behavior, keeping the project on track and minimizing delays. Effective communication is also critical for the success of the project, as GPEs need to communicate clearly and effectively with other team members, stakeholders, and clients to ensure everyone is on the same page and working towards the same goals. In addition to technical knowledge and communication skills, GPEs also need strong analytical skills and attention to detail to identify patterns and generate unique and diverse prompts. This is essential for creating effective prompts that can generate compelling marketing copy, resonate with the target audience, and achieve desired results. Overall, the combination of technical knowledge, problem-solving skills, communication, organization, time management skills, and analytical skills is crucial for a GPE to effectively develop and implement models that generate high-quality, diverse, and creative responses, while ensuring project completion on time and on budget. Generative Prompt Engineering (GPE) has numerous implications and applications in various fields. Here are some of them: Language Generation: GPE can revolutionize language generation by creating more diverse and creative responses to prompts. It can be applied in chatbots, virtual assistants, customer service, and other natural language processing (NLP) applications. Creative Writing: GPE can help writers develop their unique writing voice, streamline their writing process, and generate new ideas. It can be used to create different types of content, including novels, screenplays, and marketing copy. Marketing: GPE can be applied in marketing to craft compelling and persuasive messages that resonate with the target audience. It can help create unique and diverse copy that grabs the audience's attention and drives conversions. Education: GPE can be used in education to generate questions and responses for quizzes, exams, and homework assignments. It can help create personalized learning experiences for students and provide them with immediate feedback. Data Analysis: GPE can be applied in data analysis to generate natural language summaries of data and insights. It can help automate data reporting and make it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand complex data. Content Creation: GPE can be applied in content creation to generate content for websites, blogs, and social media. It can help generate diverse and creative content that engages the audience and drives traffic. Personalization: GPE can help create personalized experiences for users by generating tailored responses based on their preferences and past interactions. One thing's for sure, Generative Prompt Engineering has significant implications and applications in language generation, creative writing, marketing, education, data analysis, content creation, and personalization. Its potential applications are vast, and it has the potential to transform many industries and fields. I hope this discussion on Generative Prompt Engineering has inspired you to think about the power of natural language processing and the potential for creating diverse and creative responses. As you reflect on this topic, I challenge you to consider how you can apply this knowledge to your own lifescape. Perhaps you can take some time to refresh your language and analytical skills, exploring new vocabulary and grammatical structures to improve your own communication. Or maybe you can explore the potential for using natural language processing to improve your own business, writing, or creative projects. Whatever path you choose, I encourage you to take action and apply your learning to make a positive impact in your life and in the world around you. Let's harness the power of technology and language to create something truly remarkable. If you're feeling inspired by what you just read, don't just sit there, take action! Leave your comments, give me an upvote, and hit that follow button to stay tuned in for more content that'll uplift your soul. And if you're new to #hive and #ecency, don't worry, sign up is free and easy. Just click the link in the description and you'll be ready to go. But wait, there's more! If you want to help me out and support my somewhat ok posts, you can make a donation to help me with free giveaways, contests, and airdrops. You can upvote, comment, follow/subscribe, and share on different social media platforms like [HIVE, PublishOx, Medium, Reddit,](<HIVE, PublishOx, Medium, Reddit, or other social media platforms.>) and more. The quickest methods of donation are Cash.App and PayPal, and your contributions and gifts are greatly appreciated. And hey, I'm not just here to inspire you, I'm here to learn too. I'm looking for advice to help me create new communities on Hive and other platforms, and I need your help. So if you've got some great ideas, or just want to help me pay it forward, hit me up with a tip or two and let's keep making the world a better place. Disclaimer Please note that the above-provided information is for general educational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice. It is always best to check with a licensed professional before making any decisions regarding your professional life.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 16486 Views
  • Well... advertising If you need to master voices, instrumentals or designs. write me.
    Well... advertising If you need to master voices, instrumentals or designs. write me.
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 592 Views
  • If you need auditory advertising, instrumentals for your musical projects. Write me on WhatsApp with confidence.
    If you need auditory advertising, instrumentals for your musical projects. Write me on WhatsApp with confidence.
    Like
    Love
    5
    0 Comments 0 Shares 674 Views
  • Nice collection of songs and instrumental for a Tuesday ????????????????????

    #SoMeeOfficial #SoMeeSocial #Music #Features #ThankYouSoMee
    Nice collection of songs and instrumental for a Tuesday ???????????????????? #SoMeeOfficial #SoMeeSocial #Music #Features #ThankYouSoMee
    Like
    Love
    17
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2462 Views
  • How about you support me? I am uploading content to the networks. find me as @hemi_beatmaker.
    I WOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL. Today I made an instrumental of a very viral theme. IT'S OVER.
    How about you support me? I am uploading content to the networks. find me as @hemi_beatmaker. I WOULD BE VERY GRATEFUL. Today I made an instrumental of a very viral theme. IT'S OVER.
    Like
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares 353 Views
  • A bit of advertising here.
    Do you need mixing and mastering for your musical themes? Do you need "Instrumental" BEATS? Get in touch with me. To give you the sound you're looking for.
    A bit of advertising here. Do you need mixing and mastering for your musical themes? Do you need "Instrumental" BEATS? Get in touch with me. To give you the sound you're looking for.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 176 Views