Fuck You, Dr. Robert Malone !!! Our No.1 Resistance Doctor Is Endorsing Pro-Vax Trump Nominations And Will Soon Be Rewarded With A Lucrative HHS Job Being Nobody, Going Nowhere PolitiFact | Who is Robert Malone? Joe Rogan's guest was a vaccine ... “Of course I take that HHS job, being pro-vax and pro-pharma is not a problem for me.” Malone published this telling Substack today, showing the world his true face and motivations. Who is Robert Malone HHS and MAHA Appointments 1892 People's Party campaign poster promoting James Weaver for President of the United States… Read more 7 days ago · 578 likes · 173 comments · Robert W Malone MD, MS Before I dissect his post, here is a brief history of my feelings and assessments about Malone. I deliberately leave the “Dr.” out to show my disrespect and eliminate artificial “expert credibility,” which at least 95% of these so-called experts lack. They are primarily institutionalized elite-captured, trained intellectual monkeys thinking they “know” stuff. Robert W Malone MD, MS , once saved my sanity when he publicly confirmed (as an “expert”) what I have felt, like many of you, for more than a year: That the whole Covid pandemic is a scam. The vaccines are a mad idea, and we are witnessing a totalitarian overreach under the disguise of an “emergency”. Yes, I still needed “expert authority voices” to confirm my inner knowledge and common sense. I still needed validation and felt more secure hearing an “expert” agree with me. Not anymore, thanks God. (And I mean that literally.) I didn’t realise then that “my idol” was much less informed and way more idiotic than myself. After all, he took these untested injections and almost died from them. I didn’t, despite not having invented the technology. All these “experts”, even the so-called resistant “experts” with fancy titles, can all get lost until they prove their humanity, humbleness, courage and common sense to me in action, not words. I think you read my mood by now: I am pissed off and angry, and I make no excuse for it. Angry people cause meaningful changes. Always have, always will. But anger is different from violence. I hate violence, but I like healthy anger. Anger is the most natural reaction when someone abuses or takes advantage of us. It builds meaningful boundaries. Bandits take you more seriously. I know that all these liberal and radical feminists out there want to turn every angry boy into a non-angry complacent self-doubting pussy for a reason. I bet that the most useful idiots for the elites are the armies of studied intellectuals. Those toxic, ideologically captured feminists with fancy titles run the majority of deep-state bureaucratic positions these days. Somehow, they think that it is only white, old men who yield to the perverted sexual arousal of power and are completely unaware that women of any race or colour yield to the same toxic perverted sexual arousal of power. That’s why - like the old white men - they get completely out of shape and are amongst the ugliest examples of the human species the world has ever seen. I never could and never will have any respect for any ugly leader. And the ugliness starts in the heart, thirsting for power. But back to Malone. Of course, the days when I admired him are long gone. Not many leaders have the integrity to be in a position of power because of their lack of true spirituality. It is based on intimately knowing their false self (ego) and true self through daily spiritual practice, which will equip them with an authentic and profound integrity we can trust. These leaders are almost unheard of these days. Most of our leaders are selfish narcissists who are very clever in deceiving the stupid, naive masses. That’s why history is littered with horrific leaders who only brought misery, oppression, and darkness to the people. One stand-out exception to this rule was Mahatma Gandhi, a deeply spiritual man who freed India for the people in a peaceful way. That doesn’t mean he or the people were not angry about being oppressed by the British invaders in their own country. But Mahatma managed to use this lingering anger energy in a controlled, persistent, and constructive way rather than let it explode in a violent, destructive way that does nothing for the people and only disperses the usefulness of anger for change. That’s why authoritarian regimes often deliberately provoke angry but peaceful demonstrators by shoving extremely aggressive-looking, fear-inducing, powerful riot police in transhuman-looking uniforms into their faces. There are three common tactics to turn angry people into violent people: They set parameters around demonstrations to herd them in. This escalates the fear and violent aggression in the initially peaceful group. Our symptomatic nervous system goes into immediate fight-or-flight mode, but fighting seems the only option when flight is impossible. They know that, of course. If they wanted peaceful demonstrations, they wouldn’t do that, keep a low profile, and only intervene for rare destructive acts of the very few troublemakers and out-of-control people in the group. Often, some of these troublemakers are disguised police agitators within the group. (Forgive me for not providing links—it is too time-consuming for a free publication. Research yourself if you doubt me, please.) Most mainstream people doubt this tactic because they don’t think deeply enough to see the genius yet evil rationale behind it. Authoritarian systems want violence for several reasons, but one of them is to disperse the underlying anger in the population and lower the anger charge before it spreads too far and is harnessed in a deliberate, intelligent, persistent, non-violent and disciplined movement that is much more dangerous to the system as the occasional violent demonstration. It is essential to know this mechanism within ourselves, and each of us has to learn to use our anger constructively against the totalitarian regime because violence will always work in their favour. It helps them convince the scared sheeple majority that the “radicals” cause the trouble, not themselves. It also convinces them that more “emergency laws” and “surveillance” are needed to keep them in check. Back to Malone I still don’t think he was deliberately planted or captured opposition as many do, but I keep alert to this scenario as one possibility in this increasingly wicked world. I always felt that his unchecked ego and ambitions were his most significant liabilities, so I lost trust in him. The pivotal moment for me was when he sued the Braggins for “defamation”. I was no reader, nor did I know them at the time. I had no idea what the “defamation lawsuit” was about, and I didn’t care. However, it gave me valuable insight into Malone’s character, and I let him know about it in the comments before I unsubscribed. A man who “fears” for “his” reputation can’t be trusted. And a man who can’t deal with it himself and runs to the courts seemed weak to me. Shortly after, he went into “echo chamber mode” with his Substack and only allowed paying fangirls and boys to comment—a sure sign of a weak, insecure ego that can’t handle critiques or trolls. When he endorsed Trump before Kennedy did, as he proudly brags about in the above article, I knew he was out for a position of power in the new administration. So the former leader of the anti-Covid, anti-vax movement, travelling the world organizing resistance against what happened during the so-called pandemic, is now endorsing a man who did a massive U-Turn from rightly playing down the pandemic theatre initially to the still bragging-about-it architect of “operation warp speed” that brought us the mad COVID restrictions and dangerous and ineffective vaccines. who still endorses the vaccines and falsely brags that they saved hundreds of millions of lives and were a success. who openly declares on The Joe Rogan Experience BEFORE the elections that “big pharma” are his friends. For fucks sake, either everything Malone did before was a lie, or his unsatiable hunger for fame and influence makes him bridge this colossal “cognitive dissonance.” But do not worry, Malone felt obliged to explain and justify his betrayal. Of course, he doesn’t call it like that. He calls it “adjusting to DC politics”. The Subheadline sets the tone. Talking about all the pro-vax health appointments, he acknowledges: Many are disappointed. Welcome to Washington, DC politics. and Let’s take a moment to recalibrate expectations. Now, he tells us. After the elections. So after he makes his big flock of Substack sheep believe that Trump will be dramatically changing the deep-state health system and vote for him, it’s time to “recalibrate”. He is already talking like a “seasoned politician.” Fuck you, Malone, you betraying little bastard. (Is he suing me now for defamation?) Then - AFTER the election - he is using history to make a point that populist movements, like the MAGA movement, actually never really work out. Not to be negative, but the history of US populist political movements is littered with stories of unmet high expectations and subversion of those movements by established political power centers. And he is not backpedalling or making excuses, of course. After all, he is a man of integrity that stands by his words. Just to recap, I personally endorsed the once and future President Donald Trump (before Bobby Kennedy did!) and continue to stand by the logic that I described in an August 2024 Substack essay. Before even Kennedy did (exclamation mark) But then these “disappointing” pro-vax appointments happened. Who saw that coming? Our clever Dr. Robert Malone, of course. But that does not mean I have harbored any illusions that it would be easy to facilitate fundamental changes in the US Bureaucracy (Deep State) or Imperial/War State upon his election. I am very familiar with the rather evil, Machiavellian ways of Washington, DC culture. This culture has deep roots, and is similar to that observed in centers of power across the world, past and present. So he tells us - AFTER the elections and the “disappointing appointments.” BEFORE the elections, it was “vote for Trump because if anyone can clear out the swamp, Trump can and will.” Instead, appointed pro-vax mainstream doctors will clear out the criminal, oppressive and fraudulent pharmaceutical vax industry now. The appointments clearly show Trump’s “will” to clear that swamp. And Malone suddenly has doubts (AFTER the elections) that he actually can because the DC culture, which he knows so well, is so evil and international. Fuck you, Malone. Within three weeks after the election, the roaring populist MAGA Trump movement that will wipe away the demonic deep-state criminals within a few months under Trump turns into this: The history of populism is marked by failed expectations, with many movements failing to deliver on their promises to address economic and social grievances. Nevertheless, populist movements often usher in change and reforms that can benefit society and nation-states over the long term, and occasionally lead to the replacement of dysfunctional political structures. “Occassionally lead to replacement of dysfunctional politcal structures”. But only over the long term. And especially when you appoint pharma former pharma shills and mainstream consenting idiots, I suppose. Recalibrating expectations, indeed. In other words, please don’t be so stupid to think that Trump will or can address the economic and social grievances that got him elected. But if you are lucky, what Trump will do will befit you long term, and if you are super-lucky, it will even “lead to the replacement of dysfunctional political structures.” Long-term, that is, which sounds like “long after Trump." And our expert cites history to prove it—AFTER the election. Fuck you, Malone. But he is an honest man with integrity and admits: But I am beating around the bush. Ok, let’s hear what he really wants to say. Over the last few days, I have been fielding phone calls from disgruntled, disaffected, and increasingly disillusioned “MAHA”/”MAGA” supporters who are coming off of the elation of the Presidential election and wondering what happened to the commitment of their leadership to their populist agenda now that the task has been achieved. And in particular, how to interpret the plum book HHS appointments that they had imagined would be staffed by “medical freedom” and “resistance” leaders, instead of academics, TV personalities, and donors whose track records have not been so, shall we say, confrontational. Excellent questions were asked by disgruntled, disaffected, and disillusioned MAHA/MAGA supporters here. May I should add idiotic and gullible supporters? It wasn’t like Trump lied about it (for a change) or promised anything concrete. Anybody with functioning ears and two active brain cells not passing out in a complete Trump hopium trance saw this coming. I could brag about it and list all the notes and articles I wrote about it, but who cares? They trusted Malone in their assessment of Trump and got fucked over, and now Malone looks like the self-serving true idiot he is. However, he is not the only former influencer dissident who fell for Trump. All of them are scrambling for excuses now and working hard to " recalibrate and manage expectations.” Sheepishly, Malone quotes one of the stupid former dissidents, Del Bigtree, as if saying, “Look, I am not the only idiot influencer who disappointed his followers.” Fuck you, too, Del Bigtree, trying to sweet talk bullshit. It is A) 100%, arsehole. A) was promised, and that’s why many voted for Trump, and no, they do not trust your fucking B) version at all. Pro-vax mainstream medical experts that all fucked up our lives against any common sense will now be all good boys and girls we can trust? Fuck off, will you? Malone tries to distract from himself and shift the blame by writing: Suffice to say, the resulting comments were… instructive. The optics on this tweet, whether true or false, are not encouraging. And he can’t stop himself from playing fucking mind-games. “Whether true or false”? Which fucking part of this tweet looks true, and which one looks false? I thought he wanted to stop beating around the bush. Rumor was that there was a meeting between reps from large Pharma to plan response strategy. RFKjr was tapped to lead HHS, and a coordinated PsyWar media campaign to delegitimize him was immediately launched. The RFKjr HHS transition team appears to have been intimidated by this, and has chosen a strategy of nominating “trusted mainstream doctors” and similar who have not been labeled “anti-vaxxers” by the media. Conclusion? The PsyWar campaign was effective, and has moderated the resulting HHS appointments in ways that favor Pharma interests. Sound familiar? Surprise, surprise. Yes, of course, this was to be expected. So why precisely did the “transmission team” roll over after two weeks of this terrible PsyWar media campaign? Has nothing to do with Trump, eh? We all know that Trump delegates widely and trusts his people to do the right thing. He wouldn’t interfere in the “transistions team” decisions about who to nominate, would he? Malone doesn’t have the balls to admit that Trump showed the middle finger to all his “medical resistance” voters. And he showed the middle finger to Malone as well. Donald John Trump Finger Painting by Argo - Fine Art America But on second thought, I am not even sure if Malone belongs to the “medical resistance group.” He doesn’t seem that upset or angry about it. All I see him doing is “recalibrating expectations” and whitewashing everything. Despite being apparently depressed about it: Personally, I find this situation difficult, depressing, and very much aligned with the random calls I have been fielding. So much hope and effort from so many have gone into the “medical freedom” and health movements. It’s okay to be depressed about it; just don’t be angry. We don’t want to be angry with Trump yet, do we? We don’t want to burn our bridges yet. It is too early, and we still haven’t given up hope that we might personally benefit from it. Maybe all they need is the right man for the job. Now, who could that be, you might ask? Dr. Robert W Malone,MD. (THE NATION SPEAKS INTERVIEW) "3 DIFFERENT ... Me, me - chose me, please Mr. Trump and transition team. All these Marone Substack sheeple votes and glowing Trump reviews surely will be repaid, will they? Here we go: By way of disclosure, I have been asked to submit a CV and supporting documentation to this transition team, and have no interest in criticizing the same team as it is working through very challenging strategic and tactical decisions. In other words, I acknowledge a conflict of interest. Times have changed. We do not criticize pro-Covid-vaxers anymore because now they work for Trump. So much integrity, Dr. Malone. Thank you for that. And just in case we forgot the man he used to be, a brief reminder: And I am most definitely an outspoken doctor who was critical of the vaccine program and has been labeled as an “anti-vaxxer” by legacy media. So there is that. You were, Malone, you were. Not anymore. You kowtow and don’t criticise to get a job. You betrayed all genuine dissidents by siding with a candidate with a complete record of pro-vax actions all his life and admitting on air that “big pharma are his friends”. And, despite being ambivalent about it, he really wants that job. The truth is that I am personally ambivalent about the prospects of my taking some administrative line position, but I don’t want to undercut others who are seeking these slots. Someone is going to have to do these jobs, bless their heart. And there are some jobs on the line that I think I would enjoy and could be effective in. All in for the people, are we? Off to sort out the evil Washington DC bureaucrats together with a revolutionary pro-vax transition team. What a fucking hero. And we absolutely do not have to worry about him turning into a turncoat for personal power reasons. He assures us: But, like so many, I have poured my heart and soul into promoting resistance to current policies regarding many of the issues addressed by the MAHA/MAGA movement. I have a reputation for speaking truth to power, while calmly maintaining personal and professional integrity. Not addressing the appearance of appeasement and compromise would betray this history and those who have placed their faith and trust in my commitment to integrity, dignity, and community. Fuck you, Malone. He even pretends to be humble: So, here are my two cents on this situation, which are worth no more than what you have paid. But makes it very clear that everything is okay with Trump’s pro-vax, mainstream, established medical-pharmaceutical-supported nominations. “Be fair, give them a chance”, he pleads. (Because I will be one of them soon) First, these current nominees should be allowed to demonstrate their commitment and capabilities. They will now be subjected to daily attacks, by press, Uniparty and bureaucracy for the foreseeable future. Will they? Maybe, but not by the press, Uniparty, and the bureaucracy because they look like they will barely move the deckchairs on the established medical-pharmaceutical cruise ship, which is going full steam ahead as usual. The only criticism will come from the “real medical freedom” movement, and Elon will make sure that they have complete “freedom of speech” without any fucking reach, as usual. There is no upside at this point to adding fuel to the fire. President Trump has earned the right to appoint whomever he wishes, […] In other words, shut up sheep. Don’t criticise. Yes, you can be sad, but don’t be angry. What did you expect, dummy? Why don’t you study the history of popular movements before you vote? I don't believe it is my fault that your expectations were disappointed. On the contrary, I must do all this work now to “recalibrate your stupid expectations.” I want to prove myself to the transition team and land the job I really like. Fuck you, Malone. And then it gets really interesting. As we know, scientist Malone and prostitute-fucking arch-capitalist Trump miraculously turned Christian in time for the elections to reel in “the medical freedom Christians”, a significant group. Fake Trump arrest photos: How to spot an AI-generated image How does he console the betrayed Christians? Easy, very easy. Religious people are by far the most manageable group to manipulate. After all, most of them are programmed from birth to “believe”, no matter how insanely stupid and illogical the stories are. They are also programmed to always submit to a higher force. So here we go: Second, I wish to address those persons who place their faith in God. We cannot see into the future, and we cannot know the plan. There is a season for all things, and this is a season of testing. There will be a winnowing, and by their actions, (good or bad) we shall know them. Take solace in these truths, and allow time for things to declare themselves. I counsel that we should strive to act in a mature fashion, avoid overreaction, watch carefully, and stay true to ourselves, our ethics, our principles, and our souls. Malone “councels” us on religious matters, too—another one of his areas of expertise. In other words, he says: “Accept whatever we do as God’s will, no matter how wicked.” Religious by-the-book Christians are hopeless in doing anything themselves but wait for Jesus to come and “save” them. How convenient for any ruler. I would say that Christianity as a religion is perfect for any authoritarian system. Maybe that’s why it has been around for 2000 years. The only time Christianity as a religion was seriously demolished was during those early democratic attempts after WW II. The authoritarian powers during the other 1950 years did get along quite well with religious Christians. Of course, Jesus wouldn’t be regarded as a good Christian at all today as he furiously challenged the corrupt, oppressive Orthodox Jewish religion of the time and was ultimately killed for it by them. It wasn’t the Romans that asked for his crucifixion; it was the corrupt Jewish clergy. Will the passive gullible obeying Christians sitting on their non-rebellious submitting fat arses waiting for their “saviour” ever get wise to these dynamics? I doubt it. Instead, they will pray for their fellow Christian leaders, Trump and Malone and trust that God will guide them as they did for the past 2000 fucking years. Fuck you, Malone. And to finish the “document of absolute betrayel”, he plays the “Rome wasn’t built in a day” card, once again, AFTER the election. BEFORE the elections, it was all about how Trump would sweep into the white house with wrath and vengeance and destroy the evil globalist deep-state operators in one big strike. Third, Rome was not built in a day. Stay focused on long-term objectives. Be strong and firm in your resolve. The MAGA/MAHA movements are broad-based and grounded in solid logic. These movements are not one person, or one administration. […] I can’t wait for President Malone to finish the job in 28 years. And then this: I can guarantee this new administration will not eliminate government corruption. It will not end the power of the US Federal “deep state.” It will not end all wars. It will probably not even end the Senior Executive Service. It will not break the back of the pharmaceutical/industrial complex, military/industrial complex, censorship/industrial complex, or even stop the deployment of psychological warfare on Western citizens by their own governments. It will probably not stop Silicon Valley from practicing surveillance capitalism or colluding with the US, EU governments, and UN/WHO/WEF to censor speech. And it will not stop the weaponization of fear of infectious disease to control populations. So why the fuck did everyone vote for Trump then? Because of this? But it might set these things back if it acts from a position of strength and courage. It “MIGHT SET THINGS BACK IF…..” So much about “recalibrating expectations”. I think the proper term would be “completely slaughtering expectations.” FUCK YOU, MALONE I never liked Trump and encouraged everyone not to vote. I never believed he would or even could make any significant changes. He is a globalist shill and in their pocket. I was very sceptical that any meaningful health changes would happen under Trump. And yet, I am still pissed off by how quickly and swiftly the betrayal is normalized by Malone. I can’t imagine how a “medical freedom advocate” who truly believed in Trump must feel right now. With some “Schadenfreude”, I mocked them to buy medicine for their hopium hang-over. Now, I feel sorry for them. This is brutal. And Malone finally shows his true face. Fuck, he really wants that job, doesn’t he. Share Leave a comment https://substack.com/home/post/p-152217791

Who Is Dr Robert Malone? Saviour, Traitor, Transhuman Puppet, A Born Self-Confident Freedom Leader Or A Man With A God-Complex? Being Nobody, Going Nowhere This is long (probably full lengths only in the browser), but my severe accusations about the man’s character deserve proper and thorough investigation and evidence. So don’t rush it. Pick a good time and settle back. I said it before, but for my new readers, I say it again: “I do not choose the topics I write about. They choose me.” That’s why each of my articles is different and new. If you loved my rant about Malone a few days ago, I am afraid you won’t get the same again. So you can stop reading right now if that’s all you want. I don’t want to waste your time. Instead, you will get mostly a very clinical, sometimes slightly sarcastic, cold analysis of Marones's character, sprinkled with small outbursts of anger about how stupid he thinks we are. Ironically and unbelievably, even more than last time, he (they - him and Jill) deliver all their self-damaging character assassinations themselves. It is hard to say if it was caused by a complete lack of self-reflection, out-of-control arrogance, God-complex or deliberately and consciously kneeling to their new overlords. “The Moraltiy Complex” reads like a character suicide, in my opinion. But, of course, only from the “freedom movement” point of view. It is probably precisely the Substack required to convince the new, globalist transhuman-appointed regime to hire him. More betrayal of his dissident followers was requested, and a total submission to the postmodern transhuman narrative theory required. The U-turn is mind-blowing. But first things first. A few days ago, triggered by his Substack, I wrote, “Fuck You, Dr. Robert Malone”, and was blown away by how it resonated so far with thousands of people. After only three days, it almost matches my so far most-read and liked article, Stupid People, in popularity. And the comments, shares and restacks keep coming in. Thank you, everybody, for engaging with this topic. I did not expect that. I accidentally hit a raw nerve there. But then, it isn’t such a big surprise as the guy wrote his own “Betrayal Substack” right there. All I needed to do was cobble it together and express my outrage. And then he backs it up with an even more eye-opening Substack about who he really is, or, maybe more accurately, who he turned into to achieve his new objective, almost like a shape-shifter. He considers himself a high-agency transformational leader and concludes at the end: …because high-agency transformational leaders often achieve that which they seek. After finishing this article, I concluded that his man is an outright dangerous delusional narcissist based on his writings and conduct. All that matters to him (them) is me, me, me. This article is about himself (themselves) and how capable and amazing they are. It reads like a job application for the new but still globalist transhuman regime. He finishes the article with a quote by C.J. Lewis Every time you make a choice you are turning the central part of you, the part of you that chooses, into something a little different than it was before. And taking your life as a whole, with all your innumerable choices, all your life long you are slowly turning this central thing into a heavenly creature or a hellish creature […] There is no doubt in my mind that he is convinced he is turning into a “heavenly creature.” Leaders like that, narcissists with a God-complex, are incredibly dangerous when they get too much power. Beware of this man. Of course, this is only my instinctive and partly professional assessment. Each of us will draw our conclusions. I base my assessment on three pillars: my professional background, my spiritual background, and my instinct and gut feeling, which have guided me very well through the last five years. I am a trained psychotherapist and Hakomi therapist; character assessment is a big part of that. Over the past twenty years, I have also intensively read and studied spiritual leaders, and I practice meditation and self-enquiry daily. Through both my psychotherapy training with weekly personal and group therapy sessions and my spiritual work, I got great insight into my own ego structure, including the narcissistic and psychopathic parts I, like most people, have to a certain degree. As one of the critical commentators wrote, “It needs one to recognize one,” accusing me of not being different from Malone. He is right and wrong at the same time. Yes, I have these traits but am acutely aware of them. Malone is acutely and unbelievably ignorant about his narcissistic and psychopathic tendencies. Many will protest now and say: “Malone a narcissist? Maybe. But a psychopath? Never.” Unfortunately, most people’s idea of a psychopath is shaped by extreme versions of it from Hollywood movies and MSM, like serial killers. They think this character trait is the exception rather than the norm. They couldn’t be more wrong. In its much weaker non-violent expressions, it is rampant everywhere in our society. It is often expressed quite differently from what most people expect. In Hakomi character theory, the psychopathic character has two expressions: the better-known tough-generous type and the lesser-known charming-manipulative type. I think Malone is both, but mostly the latter. What all psychopathic character types have in common, to the surprise of many, is a victim mentality at the core. A psychopath has a profoundly hurt and injured self from early childhood and developed these strategies to protect himself or herself from the perpetrators that caused the injury. Therefore, they feel like victims who defend themselves, and this is used to justify, depending on the degree of the injury, almost every cruel, harsh or manipulative act against others. The “victim response” against his early critiques and attackers (suing Breggins) raised the first red flag for me and made me suspicious. In my opinion, a robust and balanced man doesn’t need to run to the courts to “defend his reputation” or restrict comments to paying subscribers. Anyway, each of us has to decide about his character, which seems very hard to grasp for most people. However, as I learned from the many comments, something in him irks people mightily and makes them distrust him instinctively, without much evidence. But we got a lot of evidence in the past few days - from the man himself. Who would know Dr. Malone better than Dr. Malone himself and, of course, his wife, Jill? To compensate for injured self-love, it is the hallmark of a narcissist to over-compensate in a need for public adoration and love. Let’s hear what the man says and judge him based on that. Why do I feel entitled to judge him? With great power comes great responsibility; if he gets things wrong, we will suffer the consequences. I am sick and tired of our leaders in general and their narcissistic, selfish abuse of the mandates they have been given by trusting people to better their lives. Why pick on him? I don’t only pick on him. I frequently criticize so-called dissident leaders and influencers who disappoint me and make me feel betrayed. For example, I wrote about Dr. McCullough, the No. 1 sell-out here and here. Very popular Trump-cock-sucker Jeff Childers is also trying very hard to get my attention. Some commentators said I am ungrateful because both Dr Malone and Dr McCullough were instrumental in turning the mass formation psychosis around. I fully agree, and I am very grateful for what they did at the time. But that is in the past. They were rewarded for it numerous times. They got famous for it and, in my opinion, couldn’t handle it. In my opinion, we have a new, much less obvious mass formation psychosis going on right now, and both support it. It is called Trump-Mania, and Trump will fix it. I know many of you will believe in Trump, and I might be proven wrong, but I am convinced that even if he wanted, he can’t. The system is too far gone, and the transhuman globalists are too powerful. As you will see below, Malone himself just converted to their ideology. And Trump is in their pocket, as I have written before, months before he was elected, in Trump Reveals He Is Pro-Israel And Pro-Globalist. This opinion brings me no joy. I wish nothing more but that I am proven wrong and that Trump puts the deep-state bureaucracy and the globalists in their place. But until then (if it happens), let’s not be stupid and naive and watch carefully. Ok, let’s dig into it, shall we? Let’s start with Jill, the quiet ghost behind the big man. We don’t talk a lot about her, do we? It is always him despite him making no secret that she is part of it, as in the first sentence of his latest article: Sometimes, someone will ask me how Jill and I accomplish everything that we do. Behind Every Great Man is a Woman Rolling Her Eyes: An Ode to Women's ... That wasn’t the simple original quote I was after (“Behind every successful man is a woman”), but I couldn’t find it anymore on Google Images. Interestingly, it has been replaced with all sorts of weird and crazy variations. Anyway, this will do. So, who is Jill? We should also ask that if we ask, “Who is Malone”? I think they come in a team, and my hunch is that she had a lot of input in that last article. I just felt that needs to be acknowledged to understand the man better. I have zero knowledge about her at all. She is like a ghost in the background to me, but she matters. Anyone? Then, the title: The Morality Paradox Immediately, what comes up for me is this: For a true leader who knows his true self and, with it, his ego self intimately, morality will never be a paradox, something that can flip-flop or change with intellectual considerations. A true and “good” leader must have a solid spiritual (not religious - beware of that) foundation and know who he is. From that foundation, all speech and actions flow spontaneously, without intellectual considerations, and a deep ethic and morality, based on first do no harm, is given and flows naturally. It will never be a paradox. Being “shifty” and “evasive” are not part of their psychological makeup. That’s why we instinctively trust them and instinctively don’t trust those who don’t have it, which, sadly, is the norm these days. I know. I am setting a very high bar for Mr. Malone; millions of our leaders don’t pass it. But that’s precisely why we are in this ethical and moral mess right now. Someone who knows his true self and ego self will be very watchful about his or her ego temptations. And even more importantly, she or he will show great humility. I find humility in all great spiritual masters and leaders who are spiritually (not religious) based. Sadly, once again, only Mahatma Gandhi comes to mind. Nelson Mandela, maybe? Surely, there must be some others. Help me out if you can in the comments. Next, the photo. A picture says more than a thousand words. There are no coincidences. Everything is chosen, mostly unconsciously. What does this photo express to you? Humility? There is, in my opinion, the narcissist right there, bathing in the attentions and adoration of the crowd and the smiling females taking photos. He looks so pleased with himself, doesn’t he? And so in charge and competent. There are not one but two screens, with adoring listeners at his feet. I see a benevolent, patriarchal-looking father figure with a biblical beard looking down on his flock. Humility, I see none. But as I said, that’s just me with my biases, history, and psychological responses. I am not saying whatever I say here is the “truth” about this man. I am sure there are many who love and adore the man as he stands there. As my mother used to say: “There is a lid for every pot.” And no, I checked myself. I am not jealous, as some commentators suggested. I do not want what he has or want to be him—not one bit. I admit that the only thing I would love to have is his many paying subscribers. But I also understand that this is not possible as long as I write as I write. To be successful in this world, we have to rub shoulders, make moral and ethical compromises, and try not to offend people. Over the years, I have had thousands of subscribers, but I tend to lose most again because something I write always offends somebody, and egos are fragile. I am terrible at writing in a style that is not offensive and will please most subscribers. And I don’t want to be a leader in action or “thought.” I want people to think and act for themselves because I believe that this insane and intense “leadership, influencer and “follower” culture” is at the core of our vastly eroding democracy and freedom. Over the years, people have been trained into good puppy dogs that consume and work and let a few do all the thinking and ruling. But I also get other great rewards from my writing, so I am becoming increasingly content with how it is. Sorry, I digress, back to the Malones. Jill and Robert have chosen to send this image as a message, and that’s how he likes to come across: a loved and admired leader “above”. Not only physically but intellectually as well. Most of the article talks about what a high-achieving, high-agency alpha leader he is. But there is more to it. His technological and intellectual expertise is also communicated. He sells himself as biblical and patriarchal but also modern and “high-agency,” smart and intelligent. Now, there is nothing wrong with that. We all sell our persona to some extent, consciously and unconsciously. We all want to matter, get ahead and be liked. But do you trust this behaviour of selling yourself? As rightly pointed out many times by C.J. Hopkins , GloboCap's dominance has turned everything into a commodity, even our character and image, especially for public figures. These days, it’s all images, perceptions, and stories with no real substance anymore. The words Sometimes, someone will ask me how Jill and I accomplish everything that we do. That is, travel about a third of each month, broadcast on TV and podcasts, write this substack, write books, write articles for other journals, garden, take care of our 20 horses, birds, dogs, and the farm, maintain a certain level of fitness, all the while taking care of our bodies and eating right Message: We are high achievers. They do not mention (in this post) that they have the finances to employ people to run the farm and probably other services, but they are undoubtedly very industrious. Once again, there is nothing wrong with that. That is the American Way of Life—work hard to get ahead. It is also a requirement for any government job he likes to get, so he is sending the right message. Does that make him a good, trustworthy leader? Maybe. It is a lot, and we aren’t perfect. Things often fall through the cracks, emails get missed, […] ..most of the time, we work hard, don’t slack, and we work long hours. We do it because we enjoy it. Okay, that's believable. But maybe also because we are “ambitious” and “want to get ahead”? That is left out. Then, they write mostly negatively about “being goal orientated.” Goal-oriented people are often rule followers. This is why so many physicians fell into the COVIDcrisis narrative. […] It can be taught, but also requires certain character traits, such as compliance with rules, attention to detail, self-control, the ability to work long hours, and a commitment to the long-term goal - whatever that may be. I am lost to the exact logic and correlation between focusing on a goal and following rules. I trained and worked as a goal-setting life coach for several years, helping people define, set, and achieve personal goals. The following rules didn’t feature at all, so why do they mention it? I believe we are getting “narrative-d” to create a certain character they like to dress themselves in. They want to be seen as rule-breakers, dissidents, agents of change - not rule followers. In my biased assessment, they want to distance themselves from being “only” goal-orientated people, often a synonym for “ambitious people”. They make it clear that they are much more than mere rule-following, goal-oriented people: Jill and I also consider ourselves to be high-agency. That sounds very dynamic and sophisticated to me, no doubt. But also a tick elitist. What is high-agency, you may ask. High-agency is a trendy new term coined by Eric Weinstein. A search on Pubmed revealed no scientific or case studies that used the term as described by the popular press and media. This is no surprise, as the psychology profession is full of paradigms that typically materialize from their dogmas. Those paradigm shifts outside that dogma are rarely embraced and often denigrated, along with those who propose them. […] Wow - it is not only a trendy new term or idea; it is already a whole “paradigm shift”, seemingly created by one man: Eric Weinstein. I can’t help but feel they want to manipulate the “narrative” even more in their favour. I had no idea that one man could create " paradigm shifts " so quickly and single-handedly. But English is my 2nd language, so I must have misunderstood the term. Let’s look it up “paradigm shift”: noun A radical change in thinking from an accepted point of view to a new one, necessitated when new scientific discoveries produce anomalies in the current paradigm. (Source) Hmm, that's not precisely what they refer to. Quite the opposite, as they admitted that “there are zero scientific research or case studies” on it. It is also not a radical change because, as they later described it, it “contains” goal-setting. It is just an extension, and to call it a paradigm shift seems like a huge exaggeration. So, why am I nitpicking this? Because it sends several underlying pretentious messages: “We are using cutting-edge paradigm-shifting methods.” “We are still dissidents - we are way ahead of the dogmatic psychological profession that denigrates us for using that cutting-edge stuff.” Then, they use an AI bot to define “High Agency”. Message: AI is good and nothing to worry about. Transhuman philosophy. AI bot “Brave” tells us that High Agency refers to an individual’s ability to shape their own destiny, bend reality to their will, and exert control over their life and work. It involves recognizing that the limitations and constraints imposed by others are merely stories, and that one has the power to rewrite those narratives. It can’t get any more postmodern than this. “Bend reality to their will” and limitations are “merely stories” that one has the power to rewrite. Translation: Our opinion and truth are just a story that they can overwrite with their will. Thanks, but no. I do not consent. This is the philosophy that gave us wokeness, trans-gender acceptance, and 5th-generation psyop - all based on the belief there is no underlying truth; everything is just a story we believe that can be changed on pure will and so forth. This is right out of the WEF transhuman playbook of Israeli Yuval Noah Harari telling us that all we are is “hackable animals.” The cognitive dissonance for them must be pretty mind-bending. On the one hand, they sign up for godless transhuman philosophy; on the other hand, they are making their Substack followers believe that they are God-fearing, homesteading, conservative, good-old Christians. Or is the latter just old news, and they have moved on, entirely focusing on getting that job and showing the new globalist regime that they are totally on board with it? Just asking. If they get that job, maybe they won’t need the Christians anymore; perhaps they won’t need the Substack anymore, either. Just speculating. And maybe they don’t need their old, very close friends anymore either? Like Mattias Desmet, who just recently dissected the transhuman Harari and blamed the underlying rational-materialistic worldview for the transhuman soulless life all around us. They definitely seem to be using their new paradigm-shifting superpowers to bend the will of the new administration to hire him. But maybe I am just jealous, too paranoid or confused and read too much into this. Let’s examine their new “reality-bending” superpowers. By signing up for “high agency,” they acquired many outstanding attributes. People with High Agency are characterized by their: Authenticity: They stay true to themselves, unapologetically pursuing their goals and values. Intentionality: They set clear goals and take deliberate action to achieve them, rather than simply reacting to circumstances. Proactivity: They don’t wait for opportunities to arise; they create their own, often finding innovative solutions to overcome obstacles. Discipline: They prioritize their goals and make sacrifices to achieve them, demonstrating self-control and perseverance. Resourcefulness: They adapt and improvise, leveraging available resources to overcome challenges and achieve their objectives. Orthogonal Thinking: They challenge conventional wisdom, asking questions that look at problems from unconventional angles and finding novel solutions. Resilience: They bounce back from setbacks and failures, using them as opportunities for growth and learning. Like a coin, there are always two sides to anything. This sounds great if you want to get things done quickly and without asking anybody else. Applied to your own life, it might be a good tool to have. But in public service? Affecting the destiny of millions of people? To me, it doesn’t sound overly democratic. But that’s just me. “Unapolgetically pursuing their goals” “Set clear goals” (I thought that was oh so old paradigm?) “Creating their own opportunities.” (Doesn’t sound like serving the people) “Very self-controlled and disciplined.” (Head-in-the-sand, no-matter-what?) “Challenging conventional wisdom” (Like common sense?) “And finding novel solutions” (Like vaccinating the whole world with an untested substance and smearing and prohibiting common sense treatments?) “Bouncing back from setbacks and failures” (like doubling and tripling down on their novel solutions?) Of course, this is a highly subjective assessment, but I do not want a leader with those attributes. It sounds creepy and lacks positive human qualities like love, compassion, grief, understanding, communication, consent, etc. This, for me, is creepy transhuman and robotic ideals based on a postmodern soulless philosophy by a programmed AI robot. And it is will-based with the individual at the centre. What can go wrong? But the Malones love it. Why wouldn’t anyone work to become more high-agency? To pursue their goals and values at all costs- full speed ahead? High-agency people work to reinvent a narrative given to them to change outcomes. They get things done. They set out to do the impossible. At all cost? Full speed? As a democratic leader? Sorry, I am running out of polite words: Fuck off, will you? They go on endorsing and explaining and selling the “high agency” narrative, which is nothing else but transhuman postmodern philosophy repacked in a new term. They also suddenly love billionaires and quote Jeff Bezos as a high agency buddy. They show fancy graphs and rebrand the “useless eaters” as “working bees”, and you guessed right, the working bees are all low-agency people. Not on the same level as them. I am not kidding: Low-agency people accept the narrative; they are complacent and tend to outsource decision-making to others. Do we now? We “outsourced” the decisions to be coerce-injected and locked away in our houses. Fuck you, Malone. But even the Malones realise that this old, repacked postmodern narrative theory can lead to unethical and morally questionable behaviour. High-agency may be great for getting things done, but there can be a morally repugnant element to the behavior and characteristics of high-agency people. This element deserves closer examination. People who exhibit high-agency characteristics, whether learned as an adult or instilled since childhood, tend to ignore ethical mores. They just charge ahead, disregarding obstacles, including ethical concerns. They often operate from within a utilitarian framework; in other words, one in which the ends are believed to justify the means. High-agency behaviors can also lead to a decrease or loss of empathy because the need to achieve an objective becomes a higher priority than taking other’s needs into account when making decisions. The deterioration or loss of empathy can lead to sociopathic behavior. Not saying? I think we just witnessed that over the past four years. And gullible and stupid people just voted in another sociopathic president - not that there was any alternative except making a no-vote statement. Many people who hire talent based on high-agency behavior profiles claim that it is essential also to identify those who exhibit integrity in addition to high-agency. I can’t see how this is possible - postmodern high agency and integrity simultaneously. They exclude each other. Integrity means the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles that you refuse to change Integrity is based on knowing and living your more profound truth. It is lightyears away from seeing everything as a narrative that can be changed and bent whenever necessary. In my opinion, they have no clue what they are talking about. They are throwing catchy new terms around to please postmodern-inclined people and might impress their awe-jawed fans. But the truth is, integrity is an easy trait to mimic. Who doesn’t know that person who goes to church each Sunday and yet has a history of abusiveness, unethical business, or political practices? So true. Who doesn’t know people who pretend to be Christians and sign up for utopian transhuman philosophies? Or people who pretend to be dissidents and fight authoritarian overreach and then suck up to them to get a job? Or people who pretend to be against vaccines and then endorse and refuse to criticise appointed pro-vax mainstream doctors because they will be colleagues soon? It never stops to amaze me how so-called intelligent people can have such an utter lack of self-reflection. It is incredibly hilarious how they describe these high-agency pitfalls but are blissfully ignorant about themselves. We are zooming in on something called a God-complex. “We, the Malones, can do no wrong.” When combined with talent, this “can do” attitude means that high-agency people understand that the world needs to believe that they are people of high integrity. It is a character trait that, at least on a resume, is important. I can’t believe what I am reading here. Can it get any more cynical? “The world needs to believe that they (we) are people of high integrity”. They are not saying, “We have integrity." In the narrative-based postmodern world, that’s not needed anymore. It is enough if we convince people “to believe we have integrity. " Integrity is also not required to be executed in real life. As long as it is on the resume and believed, all is sweet with the high-agency people. Fuck me. And yet, manipulative behaviors are often employed by those with a high-agency behavior pattern. Unfortunately, those with high-agency profiles can be very good at camouflaging such tactics. If people are stupid enough, definitely. But anyone with two brain cells left can see through all your gibberish and feel how shifty and insincere you are. The truth is that high-agency people are highly desired in business because they can inspire others, motivate others, get people to buy into their new narrative, and create change and opportunity. In a fucked-up Globocap society, no doubt. No integrity or morality is needed anymore in our “new normal” transhuman society, where everyone becomes God, shaping and bending their own narratives, meaning, do what they want “unapolligetically” no matter the cost and with full speed ahead. Sound lovely. Finally, the jump to “We, the Malones, are a different breed of high-agency people, of course. We are morally super-clean.” First, the “careful preparation”, excuse me, “narrtive bending”. Not all people with high-agency behavioral profiles choose to go down this path. […] Many very independent thinkers and doers have high agency, and in many cases, they just have prioritized different elements in their lives, such as freedom of action and thought or independence from a bureaucratic system. Ok. Here we go. Still, suggesting they are dissidents who seek “independence from the bureaucratic system” (while begging to be employed by the same system) can effectively use postmodern high-agency power against the said system. Is it kind of like double agents infiltrating the system to beat it with its own powers? Mr. Malone never lacked self-confidence and self-belief, didn’t he? I guess high-agency superpowers help. High-agency people are often transformational leaders. Hear, hear. Unfortunately, transformational leaders are often prone to narcissistic tendencies, which can lead to a cult-like following. Not saying? But that wouldn’t be you, right? It is the ability of the high-agency person to manipulate others while setting aside any moral qualms in their quest to achieve an objective that can make them dangerous to be around. Hmm Determining whether a high-agency person is worthy of trust and support can become a constant high-stakes guessing game until sufficient time has elapsed and experience accumulated. Let me break it to you. More than “sufficient time” has elapsed for me. Thanks to your insightful Substack, I can now make a very informed decision. I fucking don’t trust you one bit. Your persuasive narrative-bending powers somehow didn’t work on me. And that’s despite being a very low-agency person who " outsources its decision-making” to people like you. Maybe you have to tweak “the narrative” a bit more and use more fancy words. Or whatever. “But hang on”, he says. “You can trust me. I am not one of them bad high agency people. I am a good one.” For myself, I am high-agency much of the time, but I temper that with a high moral compass. It is so lovely of you to reassure me about that, Robert. But, firstly, I came to the spontaneous conclusion that “your narrative” is full of horse shit, that you are blind as a bat about yourself, and that I don’t trust you, no matter what new narrative about yourself you throw at me. I saw enough, and I heard enough. Secondly, if someone has a high moral compass, it is not assessed by the person himself but by others who observe what you say and do. And that doesn’t look like a high moral compass to me. You just promised all sorts of great things would happen for six months to your “followers” if they voted for Trump and then redacted it all in one big swoop and performed a “reality calibration.” You did that to get in Trump’s good books and to try to buy yourself a job with the votes of your followers. And you now side with the people you apparently fought against, and you refused to criticize pro-vax mainstream people because you don’t want to jeopardize your own job prospects. Do you call that integrity and a high moral compass? Maybe it is in your new postmodern worldview where you just bent this narrative to your liking. But how stupid do you think we are? You are too clever for your own good, Mr. Malone and just shot yourself into the kneecap - twice - and told the whole world who you really are. A self-disillusioned fraudster with a God complex. That’s at least what I think you are. Get lost. “But hang on, you don’t understand me. I am not only of highest moral standard, I am also humble and don’t allow my followers to adore me as the God-like figure I am.” However, I am human; I recognize how easily a conflict of interest can seem like a moral imperative. He will make an excellent politician. He already talks like one. “A conflict of interest can seem like a moral imperative.” Let me break it to you. In the world where I grew up, a conflict of interest is a moral imperative. In myself, it is why I reject the adoration sometimes displayed towards me. Visible in the photo you chose for this article. I recognize how easily it is to manipulate others, how easy it could be to fall into support for developing a cult of personality around my actions and narrative, and I chose not to do so. I also know it when I see it. Do you? In yourself? Maybe there is hope, then. Let’s hear about your self-reflection. Recently, I have become aware of a person whom I consider a friend who has chosen to barrel down this path towards fame, and it fills me with sadness. I watch from afar the cult-like behavior of the followers that are being actively cultivated, and I grieve for my friend. My trust in this friend as a person may have been misplaced. Not saying. Yes, such behaviour is straightforward to spot in other people, isn’t it? Other-reflection is a breeze. Self-reflection, facing our ego's ugly, unconscious sides, is almost impossible without proper spiritual work. Or deep psychological work with an outstanding, highly alert and no-bullshit therapist (very rare). And even then, the narcissistic personality responds extremely poorly to classic psychotherapy. This only leaves the third way to know ourselves: The suffering our narcissistic actions will unavoidably cause us. The slow and painful learning through suffering. And he is already sensing it. We all face so many tests, so many trials and tribulations, and in some cases, the crucible of time (and transient fame) can either transform a person into porcelain or decisions made and paths chosen may compromise integrity and soul. Such is life. The fall comes after the arrogance. Sometimes, we want something that we are not ready for to please our ego or somebody else’s ego. Fame and power are enormous temptations for the ego, inflating it beyond comprehension, and not many can handle them with humility and grace. The ego needs a solid spiritual foundation, knowing who we really are and what really matters. To me, sadly, the man failed dramatically. But I don’t matter. The new regime will love him, of that I am sure. As an ordinary human being, I wish him luck and peace. He will be humane again when reality and life disillusion him from his superiority complex. Maybe some Christians can pray for him? I don’t hate the man; I don’t think he is a bad person. That doesn’t mean he can’t do a lot of damage. Therefore, as a leader, I don’t want him. Full stop. The road to hell is plastered with “good meaning“ but self-ignorant people, and he doesn’t seem to have the right advisors around him who have the skills to break it to him. The opposite appears to be the case. But there is always the possibility that I am deluded and paranoid and live to eat my words. Time will tell. Share Leave a comment https://substack.com/home/post/p-152376708

To cover for war crimes, Israel claims it ‘lost control’ over soldiers Israel’s claim to have lost control over military units in Gaza is an attempt to gain legal cover for its troops’ war crimes, and masks a far deeper issue of systemic impunity inside the occupation army. Robert Inlakesh Several months after media commentators began predicting a “strategic defeat” for Israeli forces in Gaza, Israel’s military high command is claiming it has lost control over various units in their armed forces. The argument appears to scapegoat occupation soldiers to provide plausible deniability for their superiors and dissociate them from war crimes charges. The vast body of evidence emerging on these alleged ‘rogue Israeli units’ could potentially lead to a damning indictment of Tel Aviv’s military leadership. Despite the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) recent call on Israel to halt its military operation in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains resolute in his vow to invade, even while personally facing an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant. Marred by internal division and pressure to comply with the ICJ order, Tel Aviv finds itself in a precarious position. ‘Rogue units’ in the occupation army Hebrew-daily Haaretz dropped a narrative bombshell last weekend when it claimed that the Israeli army’s “General Staff lost control over the units, especially reserve units, months ago.” The article attempts to depict a situation in which Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi has just “woken up” to the reality of allegedly rogue elements operating under his watch, with these ‘uncontrolled units’ committing the crimes cited by the ICJ against Israel. Throughout the war in Gaza, Israeli soldiers have been publishing evidence of themselves committing crimes, showing genocidal intent, and performing perverse acts while operating inside the besieged coastal territory. These incriminating clips, published primarily on TikTok and Instagram and also within Telegram groups that glorify the killing of Palestinian civilians, have attracted a lot of bad press. It appears that Israel’s leadership is now floating the “few bad apples” strategy to absolve their military high brass of accountability. It won’t be easy. Some of these social media groups are run by occupation officials. Furthermore, the Israeli military establishment has admitted to running accounts on Telegram that showcase snuff films as part of a psychological warfare operation under the “Operations Directorate’s Influencing Department.” Which units have gone rogue? As of now, there is no official list of the units that have allegedly ‘gone rogue.’ Haaretz writer Amos Harel proposes that these troops can simply be identified by those who have posted incriminating videos of themselves. Consider the case of Yair Ben David, a commander in the 2908th Battalion, cited in the South African ICJ submission for expressing genocidal intent. He boasted about the destruction his forces caused in Beit Hanoun, northern Gaza, referencing a biblical story where all male inhabitants were massacred, and stated, “the entire Gaza should resemble Beit Hanoun.” Despite this statement being made in a video published on social media in December 2023, there has been no action taken by Israel’s military leadership to rein in his unit. Another Haaretz article published in late January, titled ‘The Israeli Army Must Act Before Some of Its Soldiers Turn Into Lawless Gangs,’ referenced Ben David’s comment and noted that “90 reservist battalion commanders petitioned the IDF chief of staff not to stop in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank until victory.” David Bar Kalifa, commander of Division 36, the largest regular division in the Israeli army, was also quoted in the article for his orders of “vengeance” against the Palestinian population. However, Tel Aviv has taken no actions to structurally change or reform the division, which was instead later transitioned to the Lebanese border, despite the head of Israel’s Southern Command, Yaron Finkelman, arguing for them to move to central Gaza. Aviad Yisraeli, an officer in the 261 Brigade’s 6261st Battalion, openly posted on social media about his intent to “make sure there is no one left” before participating in the invasion of Khan Yunis in December. Yisraeli, who lives in an illegal settler outpost near Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank, was not disciplined by his superiors and was recently deployed to Rafah. On 6 May, when Israeli forces seized the Rafah Crossing, soldiers filmed themselves destroying and desecrating the crossing and posting the footage on social media. These soldiers belonged to the 401st Brigade of the 162nd Division, while the Givati Brigade captured other areas east of Rafah. The Rafah Crossing seizure was perhaps one of the most sensitive military offensives committed by the Israelis during the entire war because their entrance into what is known as the ‘Philadelphi Corridor’ technically violated the 1979 Camp David agreement with Egypt. The use of the 401st Brigade, known for its subordination, reflects a deeper issue within the Israeli high command. Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari has been urging soldiers not to film such acts for months, which is a clear indication that the army leadership has long been aware of their actions. No disciplinary actions have been taken to date – the most proactive measure conducted by authorities has been to announce police’ investigations’ into the posting of footage online. And there has been no follow-up on these inquiries into the thousands of videos, photos, and posts from soldiers. Controlling chaos If the Israeli leadership has truly lost control of entire units in their military, why would such units be deployed back into action in sensitive areas like the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and along the Lebanese border? Such reckless decision-making, involving soldiers suspected of not following orders and whose videos are used as evidence of genocidal intent at the ICJ, is a significant indictment of the Israeli high command. In January, a report by the Hebrew ‘Kan Reshet Bet’ radio stated: Reservist fighters who were called to training ahead of the establishment of the Hashomer Brigade … have severely criticized the serious gaps in equipment, professionalism, the lack of manpower and especially the fact that in the middle of the training they were informed that they were entering the Gaza Strip without having trained as required. Such reports are not uncommon in Israeli media and reflect the state of the military leadership’s decision-making. When combined with numerous statements of genocidal intent, as documented by Palestinian rights group Al-Haq, from both military and political leadership, it paints a picture of controlled chaos. The South African legal team at the ICJ linked Netanyahu’s invocation of the biblical story of Amalek to Israeli soldiers, interpreting this as a call to mass murder Palestinian civilians. Potential war crimes motivated by such rhetoric cannot be isolated to individuals when military leadership decisions allow such behavior. If the Israeli high command is unaware of radical and uncontrolled elements within their military, how do they explain the formation of the ‘Desert Frontier’ unit, which has integrated extremist settlers from the ‘Hilltop Youth?’ This radical group of settler-vigilantes was previously described by Israeli media as terrorists for attacking Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians. An environment of impunity This problem of reckless soldier behavior did not begin in 2023; it stems from Israeli troops operating in an environment of complete impunity. During the 2008/9 war in Gaza, the worst punishment doled out to an Israeli soldier committing a crime was for stealing a credit card – not for killing, torturing, beating Palestinians, or razing their homes, businesses, and land. Or for using Palestinians as human shields – a crime Tel Aviv attributes to Hamas, but one its troops commit daily. According to B’Tselem, two soldiers involved in using a nine-year-old boy as a human shield received a three-month conditional sentence and were demoted from staff sergeant to private two years after the incident. None of their commanding officers were tried. The two soldiers in question had ordered a nine-year-old boy, at gunpoint, to open a bag they suspected was booby-trapped. Despite the gravity of their conduct - putting a young child at risk – the two were given a three-month conditional sentence and demoted from staff sergeant to private some two years after the incident took place. None of their commanding officers were tried. Since then, troop behaviors have only worsened. Despite there being so many more documented cases of Israeli soldiers deploying Palestinian civilians – often children – as human shields, this was the last case punished by the Israeli judicial system. The argument that Israel’s military leadership is only now waking up to the reality of their soldiers’ misconduct serves to create plausible deniability. It is no coincidence that extremist ideologues have been empowered in the Israeli army and that ill-disciplined soldiers, encouraged by their leaders’ genocidal rhetoric, are given carte blanche to commit crimes against Palestinians. https://thecradle.co/articles-id/25201 To cover for war crimes, Israel claims it ‘lost control’ over soldiers Israel’s claim to have lost control over military units in Gaza is an attempt to gain legal cover for its troops’ war crimes, and masks a far deeper issue of systemic impunity inside the occupation army. Robert Inlakesh Several months after media commentators began predicting a “strategic defeat” for Israeli forces in Gaza, Israel’s military high command is claiming it has lost control over various units in their armed forces. The argument appears to scapegoat occupation soldiers to provide plausible deniability for their superiors and dissociate them from war crimes charges. The vast body of evidence emerging on these alleged ‘rogue Israeli units’ could potentially lead to a damning indictment of Tel Aviv’s military leadership. Despite the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) recent call on Israel to halt its military operation in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains resolute in his vow to invade, even while personally facing an International Criminal Court (ICC) arrest warrant. Marred by internal division and pressure to comply with the ICJ order, Tel Aviv finds itself in a precarious position. ‘Rogue units’ in the occupation army Hebrew-daily Haaretz dropped a narrative bombshell last weekend when it claimed that the Israeli army’s “General Staff lost control over the units, especially reserve units, months ago.” The article attempts to depict a situation in which Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi has just “woken up” to the reality of allegedly rogue elements operating under his watch, with these ‘uncontrolled units’ committing the crimes cited by the ICJ against Israel. Throughout the war in Gaza, Israeli soldiers have been publishing evidence of themselves committing crimes, showing genocidal intent, and performing perverse acts while operating inside the besieged coastal territory. These incriminating clips, published primarily on TikTok and Instagram and also within Telegram groups that glorify the killing of Palestinian civilians, have attracted a lot of bad press. It appears that Israel’s leadership is now floating the “few bad apples” strategy to absolve their military high brass of accountability. It won’t be easy. Some of these social media groups are run by occupation officials. Furthermore, the Israeli military establishment has admitted to running accounts on Telegram that showcase snuff films as part of a psychological warfare operation under the “Operations Directorate’s Influencing Department.” Which units have gone rogue? As of now, there is no official list of the units that have allegedly ‘gone rogue.’ Haaretz writer Amos Harel proposes that these troops can simply be identified by those who have posted incriminating videos of themselves. Consider the case of Yair Ben David, a commander in the 2908th Battalion, cited in the South African ICJ submission for expressing genocidal intent. He boasted about the destruction his forces caused in Beit Hanoun, northern Gaza, referencing a biblical story where all male inhabitants were massacred, and stated, “the entire Gaza should resemble Beit Hanoun.” Despite this statement being made in a video published on social media in December 2023, there has been no action taken by Israel’s military leadership to rein in his unit. Another Haaretz article published in late January, titled ‘The Israeli Army Must Act Before Some of Its Soldiers Turn Into Lawless Gangs,’ referenced Ben David’s comment and noted that “90 reservist battalion commanders petitioned the IDF chief of staff not to stop in Gaza, Lebanon, and the West Bank until victory.” David Bar Kalifa, commander of Division 36, the largest regular division in the Israeli army, was also quoted in the article for his orders of “vengeance” against the Palestinian population. However, Tel Aviv has taken no actions to structurally change or reform the division, which was instead later transitioned to the Lebanese border, despite the head of Israel’s Southern Command, Yaron Finkelman, arguing for them to move to central Gaza. Aviad Yisraeli, an officer in the 261 Brigade’s 6261st Battalion, openly posted on social media about his intent to “make sure there is no one left” before participating in the invasion of Khan Yunis in December. Yisraeli, who lives in an illegal settler outpost near Bethlehem in the occupied West Bank, was not disciplined by his superiors and was recently deployed to Rafah. On 6 May, when Israeli forces seized the Rafah Crossing, soldiers filmed themselves destroying and desecrating the crossing and posting the footage on social media. These soldiers belonged to the 401st Brigade of the 162nd Division, while the Givati Brigade captured other areas east of Rafah. The Rafah Crossing seizure was perhaps one of the most sensitive military offensives committed by the Israelis during the entire war because their entrance into what is known as the ‘Philadelphi Corridor’ technically violated the 1979 Camp David agreement with Egypt. The use of the 401st Brigade, known for its subordination, reflects a deeper issue within the Israeli high command. Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari has been urging soldiers not to film such acts for months, which is a clear indication that the army leadership has long been aware of their actions. No disciplinary actions have been taken to date – the most proactive measure conducted by authorities has been to announce police’ investigations’ into the posting of footage online. And there has been no follow-up on these inquiries into the thousands of videos, photos, and posts from soldiers. Controlling chaos If the Israeli leadership has truly lost control of entire units in their military, why would such units be deployed back into action in sensitive areas like the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and along the Lebanese border? Such reckless decision-making, involving soldiers suspected of not following orders and whose videos are used as evidence of genocidal intent at the ICJ, is a significant indictment of the Israeli high command. In January, a report by the Hebrew ‘Kan Reshet Bet’ radio stated: Reservist fighters who were called to training ahead of the establishment of the Hashomer Brigade … have severely criticized the serious gaps in equipment, professionalism, the lack of manpower and especially the fact that in the middle of the training they were informed that they were entering the Gaza Strip without having trained as required. Such reports are not uncommon in Israeli media and reflect the state of the military leadership’s decision-making. When combined with numerous statements of genocidal intent, as documented by Palestinian rights group Al-Haq, from both military and political leadership, it paints a picture of controlled chaos. The South African legal team at the ICJ linked Netanyahu’s invocation of the biblical story of Amalek to Israeli soldiers, interpreting this as a call to mass murder Palestinian civilians. Potential war crimes motivated by such rhetoric cannot be isolated to individuals when military leadership decisions allow such behavior. If the Israeli high command is unaware of radical and uncontrolled elements within their military, how do they explain the formation of the ‘Desert Frontier’ unit, which has integrated extremist settlers from the ‘Hilltop Youth?’ This radical group of settler-vigilantes was previously described by Israeli media as terrorists for attacking Israeli soldiers and Palestinian civilians. An environment of impunity This problem of reckless soldier behavior did not begin in 2023; it stems from Israeli troops operating in an environment of complete impunity. During the 2008/9 war in Gaza, the worst punishment doled out to an Israeli soldier committing a crime was for stealing a credit card – not for killing, torturing, beating Palestinians, or razing their homes, businesses, and land. Or for using Palestinians as human shields – a crime Tel Aviv attributes to Hamas, but one its troops commit daily. According to B’Tselem, two soldiers involved in using a nine-year-old boy as a human shield received a three-month conditional sentence and were demoted from staff sergeant to private two years after the incident. None of their commanding officers were tried. The two soldiers in question had ordered a nine-year-old boy, at gunpoint, to open a bag they suspected was booby-trapped. Despite the gravity of their conduct - putting a young child at risk – the two were given a three-month conditional sentence and demoted from staff sergeant to private some two years after the incident took place. None of their commanding officers were tried. Since then, troop behaviors have only worsened. Despite there being so many more documented cases of Israeli soldiers deploying Palestinian civilians – often children – as human shields, this was the last case punished by the Israeli judicial system. The argument that Israel’s military leadership is only now waking up to the reality of their soldiers’ misconduct serves to create plausible deniability. It is no coincidence that extremist ideologues have been empowered in the Israeli army and that ill-disciplined soldiers, encouraged by their leaders’ genocidal rhetoric, are given carte blanche to commit crimes against Palestinians.

Watch as Russian fighter jet nearly hits US F-16 near Alaska amid military drills, raises tensions Oct 01, 2024, 01:24:13 PM IST Watch as Russian fighter jet nearly hits US F-16 near Alaska amid military drills, raises tensionsAP In this Sept. 23, 2024, image taken from video, a U.S. Air Force F-16 operating under the direction of North American Aerospace Defense Command, conducts a routine intercept of a Russian Tu-95 aircraft in the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) when NORAD said a Russian Su-35 aircraft conducts an unsafe maneuver directed at the F-16. (Department of Defense via AP) A Russian Su-35 fighter jet came dangerously close to a US F-16 near Alaska on September 23, as confirmed by newly released video footage from the US military. The incident occurred just beyond US sovereign airspace, within the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), where the US routinely monitors and intercepts foreign aircraft that approach its territory. The close encounter drew condemnation from US military officials, who criticized the Russian jet for its unsafe maneuver. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads General Gregory Guillot, the commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and US Northern Command, stated that the Russian pilot’s actions were reckless and hazardous. “The conduct of one Russian Su-35 was unsafe, unprofessional, and endangered all – not what you’d see in a professional air force,” Guillot said. He further explained that the US F-16 was flying in a “safe and disciplined” manner as part of routine operations to intercept the Russian aircraft that had entered the ADIZ. The incident comes on the heels of multiple Russian incursions into the ADIZ in recent weeks. The US has been closely monitoring the situation, especially given the broader context of growing military activity by both Russia and China in the region. While Russian aircraft have not breached US airspace, the increasing frequency of such encounters has raised alarms within the US military. US Response: Building Military Presence in Alaska US Senator Dan Sullivan, a Republican and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, highlighted the seriousness of the situation. He emphasized the need to strengthen the US military’s presence in Alaska and the Arctic to counter these aggressive maneuvers. “The reckless and unprofessional maneuvers of Russian fighter pilots — within just a few feet of our Alaska-based fighters — in Alaska’s ADIZ on September 23 put the lives of our brave Airmen at risk and underscore the escalating aggression we’re witnessing from dictators like Vladimir Putin,” Sullivan said in a statement. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In response to these provocations, the US has taken steps to bolster its military readiness in the region. In August, about 130 US soldiers, along with mobile rocket launchers, were deployed to Shemya Island, located approximately 1,931 kilometers southwest of Anchorage. The deployment was part of a week-long exercise aimed at deterring further incursions and demonstrating US capability to respond to any threats in the region. Growfast logo Artificial Intelligence(AI) Java Programming with ChatGPT: Learn using Generative AI By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Basics of Generative AI : Unveiling Tomorrow's Innovations By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Generative AI for Dynamic Java Web Applications with ChatGPT By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Mastering C++ Fundamentals with Generative AI: A Hands-On By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Artificial Intelligence(AI) Master in Python Language Quickly Using the ChatGPT Open AI By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Office Productivity Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide 2024 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Astrology Vastu Shastra Course By - Sachenkumar Rai, Vastu Shashtri View Program Data Science SQL for Data Science along with Data Analytics and Data Visualization By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Web Development A Comprehensive ASP.NET Core MVC 6 Project Guide for 2024 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Office Productivity Mastering Microsoft Office: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and 365 By - Metla Sudha Sekhar, Developer and Lead Instructor View Program Russia and China’s Growing Military Cooperation This incident comes amid increasing concerns over military cooperation between Russia and China, both of which have shown growing interest in the Arctic and its strategic significance. In July 2024, Russian and Chinese bombers flew together for the first time in international airspace off Alaska during a joint military drill. These exercises were part of a broader strategic alignment between the two nations, which has caught the attention of US defense officials. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had previously expressed concerns over the Russia-China military partnership, particularly regarding China’s support for Russia amid the ongoing war in Ukraine. “This is a relationship that we have been concerned about throughout — mostly because we’re concerned about China providing support to Russia’s illegal and unnecessary war in Ukraine,” Austin said in a press briefing. Additionally, earlier military exercises involving both Russian and Chinese forces were observed in 2022 when a US Coast Guard ship discovered a formation of Russian and Chinese naval vessels, including three Chinese and four Russian ships, sailing near Alaska’s Kiska Island. This incident, coupled with the recent joint drills, has raised questions about the long-term strategic goals of both nations in the Arctic region. US Military Vigilance in the Face of Rising Threats The US continues to express concerns over the potential threat posed by Russia and China’s military activities in the region. While none of the recent incursions have resulted in the breach of US airspace, the repeated presence of Russian and Chinese forces near Alaska has prompted a more assertive response from the US military. As tensions escalate, officials in Washington are calling for enhanced military infrastructure and a stronger defense posture in Alaska and the Arctic. Sullivan, in particular, has been a vocal advocate for building up the US military’s capacity in the region, stressing that the situation is becoming increasingly volatile. The release of the video footage from the September 23 incident serves as a stark reminder of the precarious balance in the region, where US forces must continuously monitor and respond to foreign military activity just beyond their borders. With both Russia and China increasing their presence in the Arctic, the US military remains vigilant, prepared to defend its interests in a region that has taken on heightened geopolitical importance. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/watch-as-russian-fighter-jet-nearly-hits-us-f-16-near-alaska-amid-military-drills-raises-tensions/articleshow/113843067.cms

Ukraine and Israel: Two Stalinist Remnants - VT Foreign Policy September 23, 2024 VT Condemns the ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINIANS by USA/Israel $ 280 BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS INVESTED since 1948 in US/Israeli Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation Operation; $ 150B direct "aid" and $ 130B in "Offense" contracts Source: Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C. and US Department of State. Ukraine and Israel: Two Stalinist Remnants: We’re going to blow up the world for this? By Richard C. Cook, Co-Founder and Lead Analyst, American Geopolitical Institute. Author, Our Country, Then and Now (Clarity Press, 2023) September 20, 2024 Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill: Toward the end of World War II, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin were the two most powerful men in the world. It was the Soviet Union’s Red Army under Stalin that brought final defeat to the German Wehrmacht and had taken over almost all of Eastern Europe. Held back by British Prime Minister Winston Churchill from launching its assault on France until D-Day, the U.S. Army nevertheless advanced to meet the Soviets at the Elbe River just west of Berlin. Roosevelt was no friend of Churchill. Roosevelt saw the British Empire as a relic of history to be gotten rid of as soon as possible, with Britain soon being forced to grant independence to most of its colonies, including the imperial crown jewel of India. Roosevelt and Stalin were as close to being friends as two such dissimilar figures could be. We know that Roosevelt’s administration was heavily staffed by Soviet sympathizers. Through Lend-Lease, the U.S. had quietly aided the building of the Soviet military machine so that it would be ready for Hitler’s Operation Barbarossa invasion in June 1941. Then in June1944 at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, less than a month after D-Day, Roosevelt’s negotiators succeeded in making the U.S. dollar the world’s predominant currency, displacing the British pound. At the Yalta Conference in February 1945, not only did Roosevelt agree to meet on Stalin’s home turf in Crimea, but he also gave de facto recognition to the Soviet Union’s occupation of Eastern Europe, though Stalin did promise elections that were never held. Another agreement at Yalta was to create the United Nations, where the Soviet Union was given a seat on the Security Council of equal status with the U.S., Britain, France, and Nationalist China. (In China, the government of Chiang Kai-Shek was overthrown by Mao’s communists in 1949.) Meanwhile, all Churchill could do was watch and fume. This had not been the plan. Churchill had every reason to hope that when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, the two totalitarian nations would destroy each other. Now Stalin stood like a colossus over half of Europe. And Roosevelt was going along. Truman, Britain, and the National Security State Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, two months after Yalta and a month before V-E day. Now Harry S. Truman, a virtual unknown on the world stage, was president. In what was a virtual palace coup, the pro-British forces within the administration took over. Truman was a cipher who first obeyed instructions in dropping the A-bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945. Before he became president, Truman had not even been told about the Manhattan Project to develop the bomb. The purpose was not to force Japan to surrender—the Japanese were already prostate. Rather it was much more likely to warn and intimidate the Soviet Union. (After the war, a faction within the U.S. military wanted to nuke the Soviet Union immediately.) Over the next three years, Truman enacted all of the measures needed to create what became the permanent National Security State, including formal establishment of the CIA through the National Security Act of 1947. But what many historians view as the start of the Cold War and U.S./British disengagement from the Soviets as erstwhile World War II allies, was Churchill’s famous “Iron Curtain” speech of March 5, 1946, in Fulton, Missouri. It was also the British who took the lead in prevailing on the U.S. to fund the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe, including West Germany, starting in 1948 and in bringing NATO into existence as an anti-Soviet alliance in April 1949. Finally, in June 1950 came the start of the Korean War, with armed conflict between the West and the Communist Bloc now the focal point of worldwide geopolitical affairs from then on. Stalin’s Reaction and the Creation of Ukraine Stalin reacted to the U.S./British actions with near-panic. Elections in the occupied Eastern European nations were cancelled, with single-party governments under the various national communist parties installed. These were backed by Red Army occupational forces. Yugoslavia also became a communist state allied with the Soviets under wartime leader Josip Broz Tito. In Greece, a communist uprising led to civil war from 1946-1949, leading there to a pro-Western government but an armed conflict nonetheless, one that left Greece in ruins. In reaction to NATO, the Soviets created their own alliance, the Warsaw Pact, fully in place by 1955. The Warsaw Pact was a collective defense treaty established by the Soviet Union and seven other Soviet satellite states in Central and Eastern Europe: Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland and Romania. The Soviets had already incorporated a tier of states along its western border that formerly had varying degrees of independence. These became “republics” within the overall framework of the USSR, including the three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania to the north, Belorussia, or White Russia, further south, followed by the vast region of Ukraine, then the smaller entity of Moldova. These were all countries that became independent after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990-1991. The most problematic of these newly-formed nations was Ukraine, cobbled together by the Soviets from 1922 to 1954 from various antecedents, including the original Russian homeland around the one-time capital of Kiev. Much of eastern Ukraine consisted of lands conquered by Catherine the Great and peopled with ethnic Russians. In February 1954, the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union transferred the Crimean Peninsula from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. This was a measure said to be taken by Soviet Premier Khrushchev for “administrative” purposes. What it would later mean was that the giant Soviet Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol would be part of Ukraine when it gained its independence in 1991. Crimea would stay that way until Russia re-annexed it after the 2014 Maidan coup. Ukraine also was home to large numbers of Jews, who, along with Russians, Poles, and Belarusians, were subjected to massacres during World War II. Jews of Ukraine and Poland carried out large migrations to America, then to Israel, in the late 19th-20th centuries, lasting in Israel to the 1990s. As examples, many of the leaders of the Neocon faction within the U.S. are descendants of Ukrainian Jews, as is the Illinois Priztker family that is prominent in Democratic Party politics. In Western Ukraine are large numbers of people of Romanian, Hungarian, Polish, and other extractions, many becoming Soviet citizens only with the post-World War II redrawing of the map when Ukraine itself became a confusing mixture of nationalities, ethnicities, and religions. The Ukrainian Mess After the fall of the Soviet Union and the emergence of an independent Ukraine, Ukraine quickly became a mess. The various factions within what was now one of the largest and most heavily industrialized parts of Europe, along with a rich agricultural heartland, competed for dominance. This included Neo-Nazis left over from collaboration with Germany. The lines of conflict were drawn partly along the lines of pro-Russian vs. pro-Western influences. In fact, from the very end of World War II, Western intelligence services were at work in Ukraine, trying to swing the country in their favor. The West seemed to gain the upper hand through the U.S.-sponsored “Maidan” coup in 2014, leading to the creation of today’s regime. After 2014, with NATO arming and training the Ukrainian military, the situation soon devolved into an assault on the eastern Russian-speaking provinces, the Donbas. Russia responded by invading Ukraine in its February 2022 Special Military Operation. The West came to the Ukrainian government’s aid with weapons, funding, and anti-Russian sanctions, all to no avail as Russia’s industrialized military machine is now close to defeating Ukraine’s forces. The West also suppressed any Ukrainian interest in negotiating with Russia. Vlodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, is Jewish and has said he wants Ukraine to become “the ‘big Israel’ with its own face.” Under his presidency, over 100,000 Ukrainians, mainly gentiles, have died in the war. Persecutions against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have become common. The question now is whether Ukraine and its Western sponsors will accept defeat and move to a settlement with Russia based on agreement that what is left of Ukraine will stay out of NATO as a demilitarized neutral state, or whether Ukraine’s backers, mainly in Britain and the U.S., will go off the deep end and continue provoking Russia until a hot nuclear war results in Europe or beyond. The Soviet Role in Creating Israel I have no intention of reprising the entire history of Israel here. I will touch on the pertinent highlights, but I will add that I do not believe in concepts such as the “Chosen People,” etc. which I view as totally imaginary. I believe that every human being on the planet is divine in their essence, though it is up to each of us to develop that potential, and that helpers have been sent, some of whom have lived in a mortal form, to assist. For more on this topic, See here. I do not believe that an individual’s worth derives from his or her race, religion, nationality, level of education or income, social or occupational rank, or popularity. I believe one’s worth derives solely from one’s deeds. Thus a person who appears inconspicuous or unknown may objectively be worth more than a president, general, movie star, media personage, or billionaire. Nor do I believe that past wrongs to my ancestors give me the right to exact retribution from others. I have Anglo-Saxon ancestors whose lands were stolen by the Normans in 1066. Do I have a right to attack the present King of England? I have Native American ancestors of whom millions died at the hands of European invaders. Do I have a right now to steal the property of these invaders’ descendants? I also have Jewish relations through my extended family, and I am glad that so many Jews have found their own “Promised Land” in America. I don’t expect any payback for that. I am also very familiar with the history of the Zionist movement but wish to point out that it was the British during the 19th century who first came up with the idea of declaring Palestine a Jewish homeland. This was before Jewish Zionism even existed. The purpose was to gain control of the southern terminus of the “Mackinder Line,” extending from the Baltic Sea to the Levantine Coast, in order to have dominion over the Eurasian heartland. For more on this history, See here. The Zionist movement picked up speed after the British government’s Balfour Declaration of 1917 promised Palestine as a Jewish homeland. Britain obtained Palestine as a League of Nations “mandate” after the Treaty of Versailles brought World War I to an end. The problem then for the Zionist leaders was that Jews did not want to move to Palestine. Conditions were not great for farming, there were no jobs, and the indigenous Arab population did not want them. So during the 1930s, particularly with the worldwide economic slowdown, the Zionist project was looking at failure. In particular, American Jews, who had assimilated peacefully and happily in large numbers had virtually no interest in moving to Palestine, though some were willing to donate money to help European Jews who might emigrate. But even then, most European Jews who wanted to leave Europe were going to America. (When Hitler came to power he made an agreement with Zionist leaders to aid Jews in emigrating to Palestine.) Then came World War II, during which large numbers of European Jews lost their lives. Note, however, that within the Soviet Union, far more Christians than Jews had lost their lives during and after the Bolshevik Revolution that was largely run by Jews. See here. At some point toward the end of World War II, the decision was made for an army of Jews to travel from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to seize Palestine from its Arab inhabitants and establish the state of Israel. Because there were so few Jews remaining in Western Europe or living in America who wanted to move to Israel, those in charge resorted to scouring the refugee camps of Eastern Europe to find individuals who could literally be drafted and forced to go. See here. The invading Jews first fought against the British who were still holding Palestine as a mandate, now under the UN, then seized the lands of the Arab occupants, massacred thousands, and drove 700,000 off their land into refugee camps. This is called the Nakba. It has been going on ever since but became much worse after the events of October 7, 2023. A hypothesis I now want to present a hypothesis, knowing it is just that—a hypothesis. We know that at some point in the early history of the Soviet Union, Stalin decided to purge that element of the original Bolsheviks and their successors who favored worldwide revolution. One name for this faction was the “Trotskyites.” Trotsky himself, a Jewish leader of the Bolsheviks, was assassinated, presumably at Stalin’s direction, in Mexico in 1940. He had been expelled from the Soviet Union in 1929. During the period between the revolution and Trotsky’s assassination, the influence of radical Jews in the Soviet government gradually declined. (Trotsky did become a mentor to a faction of Jews in the U.S. who later became part of the Necons.) Also, in order to defeat Germany in World War II, the Soviets had to tap the deepest recesses of Russian national tradition, emotion, and inner strength. Russia became Russia once again, leading to the extraordinary development of science, scholarship, military prowess, and technology that has continued until today. But the radical Jews had remained a revolutionary force. My hypothesis is that because Stalin still wanted to get rid of them, when the dust settled from World War II, he decided to send them to Israel. They went, not as migrants, but as conquerors. It seems true that the most violent and extreme elements of the Israeli leadership have been Russian and East European Jews. The Soviet government assisted these people in getting to Israel and in drafting recruits from the refugee camps. They were also armed with weapons from the Czech munition plants then under the control of the Red Army. None of this could have been done without Stalin’s approval. The Soviet Union was the first country to recognize Israel in 1948. This was followed quickly by the U.S., with Truman being the recipient of large wads of cash from American Jews for his presidential campaign that year. See here. Nor did Stalin send them to become a Soviet fifth column in the Middle East. Israel quickly aligned itself with Britain, France, and the U.S., while the Soviet Union became partial to Nasser in Egypt and other anti-Western elements in the Arab world. The Non-Aligned Movement the Soviets supported drew heavily on these elements. That’s the hypothesis. Fast forwarding to recent years, no less an authority than former Marine and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter has said that when he visited Israel in the 1990s, society there was moving toward a peaceful accommodation with the Palestinians that would eventually lead to the so-called “two-state solution.” Ritter says what then happened was that a new influx of Jews from Russia arrived on the scene with what seems to me the same kind of violent intolerance shown by the original terrorists who created Israel in the first place. Ritter’s commentary is compelling. It was these new arrivals who began to take over the Israeli government and who are now the driving force in Netanyahu’s reactionary coalition that has conducted the Gaza/West Bank genocide and is agitating for an expanded war, starting with a conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. This could readily escalate into a broader war involving the U.S. and Iran or a worse conflict with Russia, Iran’s ally. The positive side, at least for Russia, is that Russia may now have rid itself entirely of its violent Jewish partisans. Russia has also gotten rid of or disciplined those Jewish oligarchs who took part in the looting of Russia in the 1990s. The Jews who have remained appear to be loyal, productive, law-abiding citizens who enjoy good relations with the Russian government. Conclusion World War III now threatens on two fronts—Ukraine and Israel. In both places, powerful forces are trying to draw the U.S. and the West into much larger conflagrations. In both places, a radical Jewish faction lurks behind the chaos—Zelensky’s government in Ukraine and Netanyahu’s in Israel. But both conflicts can be seen as Stalinist remnants of World War II. Why should the unfinished business of a long-dead Soviet dictator be allowed to determine the fate of the world today? Why can’t reasonable people from all sides now come together to repair these long- simmering tragedies so that the world can move ahead in peace, cooperation, and understanding? New eBook Available on Global Research https://www.globalresearch.ca/world-war-iii-is-on-but-the-empire-has-already-lost-an-american-civil-war-looms-spiritual-transformation-is-the-only-way-to-prevent-extinction/5868285 Richard C. Cook is co-founder and lead investigator for the American Geopolitical Institute. Mr. Cook is a retired U.S. federal analyst with extensive experience across various government agencies, including the U.S. Civil Service Commission, FDA, the Carter White House, NASA, and the U.S. Treasury. As a whistleblower at the time of the Challenger disaster, he exposed the flawed O-ring joints that destroyed the Space Shuttle, documenting his story in the book “Challenger Revealed.” After serving at Treasury, he became a vocal critic of the private finance-controlled monetary system, detailing his concerns in “We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform.” He served as an advisor to the American Monetary Institute and worked with Congressman Dennis Kucinich to advocate for replacing the Federal Reserve with a genuine national currency. See his new book, Our Country, Then and Now, Clarity Press, 2023. Also see his Three Sages Substack at https://montanarcc.substack.com and his American Geopolitical Institute articles at https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/category/agi/ “Every human enterprise must serve life, must seek to enrich existence on earth, lest man become enslaved where he seeks to establish his dominion!” Bô Yin Râ (Joseph Anton Schneiderfranken, 1876-1943), translation by Posthumus Projects Amsterdam, 2014. Also download the Kober Press edition of The Book on the Living God here. Richard C. Cook Richard C. Cook is a co-founder and Lead Investigator for the American Geopolitical Institute. Mr. Cook is a retired U.S. federal analyst with extensive experience across various government agencies, including the U.S. Civil Service Commission, FDA, the Carter White House, NASA, and the U.S. Treasury. As a whistleblower at the time of the Challenger disaster, he exposed the flawed O-ring joints that destroyed the Shuttle, documenting his story in his book “Challenger Revealed.” After serving at Treasury, he became a vocal critic of the private-finance-controlled monetary system, detailing his concerns in “We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary Reform.” He served as an advisor to the American Monetary Institute and worked with Congressman Dennis Kucinich to advocate for replacing the Federal Reserve with a genuine national currency. His latest book is “Our Country, Then and Now” (Clarity Press, 2023). https://www.claritypress.com/product/our-country-then-and-now/ In this book, Mr. Cook postulates that our country has lost touch with its founding principles, among which is the Bill of Rights, which we must reaffirm to survive as a nation. ATTENTION READERS We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion. About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/09/ukraine-and-israel-two-stalinist-remnants/

THAT I MAY KNOW HIM (Phil.3:10)! 🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥 Theme: The Call To Righteousness (1Cor.15:34)! 🚥 🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥 Today again, by His wonderful grace and mercy, I am once more beaming the searchlight on my constituency"The Church of God!" And this time, I intend to compare the church at"Shiloh" with our church of today! I do sincerely hope we will be more prepared by the lessons contain therein. ELI AND HIS SONS;AS AN ASSEMBLAGE TODAY'S CHURCH! (1Sam.2:12-17,22-25). ♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️ Anointing is a very important component of the Christian Faith.Indeed, it's what makes the difference between a God called pastor and a self called pastor.Either way,a great responsibility is attached to it. This is what Eli and his sons never realized,and in the process, not only did they destroyed themselves,but also effectively put and end to any hope of their lineage ever serving in the Temple again! Hophni and Phinehas(Eli's sons) were ordained pastors, but took the anointing for granted and misused it.And it's the same with what is obtained in the church today! In a greater percentage of our churches,if not all, anointing has become a commodity to be traded with. 👉The Scriptures called the sons of Eli *Sons of Belial* (1Sam.2:12,Lk.16:13.)54 d Now,Belial is the name of a demon. One may wonder why a pastor should be called the son of a demon.There is abundant proof that they attempted to serve two masters.You can't serve God and serve a demon simultaneously. Unfortunately, this is the position of the church today.When we say"demon",it mayn't be the actual demon per se, but it's symbolic here. Truly,many of us believers are unconsciously engaged in demon and mammon worship.For instance,many of us serve other gods like self, money, pleasure,ego, property(eg,car and buildings)and persons ,etc. Remember this, whoever we yield to is our master, i.e, anything that takes the place of God in our life,is our idol.We all have idols in different forms in our lives. For a majority of us, UNCONSCIOUSLY until someone who truly loves us, and at the cost of a shared relationship points them out to us. An example of this is PRIDE. Many of us may be highly disciplined, but UNCONSCIOUSLY, pride becomes an unseen partner leading to SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS. You don't have to agree. Don't forget I said, we all have our idols, perhaps we feel better calling them out weaknesses, idols are what really they are since they can take God's Place in our lives. The other day, when I spoke about some Fathers of the Reformation being UNSEEN IDOLS in the lives of some of us, only God knows what family members where thinking of me... Like, where did this guy got lost from. BUT THE TRUTH REMAINS THAT GOD CALLED HIS OWN ANOINTED PASTORS *SONS OF A DEMON* WHY? BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY DID... DISLOYALTY TO GOD. Truly,we all have our own idols in our hearts, either publicly or privately.We frankly need to seek assistance from God in order to come out clean from every pollution and adulteration! 👉They knew not the Lord;1Sam.2:12,Rom.1:28-32) Can it be said truly that Hophni and Phinehas didn't really know there's God? They certainly did,but chose LUST ABOVE GOD. We don't know God,if we don't obey Him. Their dad, *ELI* was the *G.O.* Yet, being pastors, they knew not the Lord.Bearing the title"Pastor", isn't what makes you one,but your intimacy with God. You know, it's possible to do God's Work, preach the gospel fantastically, and even work wonders without knowing HIM at all.In today's world, there's a mad rush for miracles, without caring how they come.And the devil has taken advantage of the situation.Thus pastors are trying to outshine themselves,in their lifestyles, without batting eyelids. Their interest isn't to please the Lord,no... not at all.They don't know HIM, not to talk of having a relationship with HIM.So you see, working of miracles (magic), doesn't prove one's intimacy with God.Nor does acrobatic displays on the pulpit turned podiums, or a good command of the English Language makes you a friend of Christ Jesus. Infact,HIS inner cabinet members were unlearned fishermen! Of course we know them. These unlearned fishermen recognized His Deity and their duties to Worship Him... These ones knew Christ Jesus. As God's emissary,and purposedly misrepresenting God to HIS children because of "SELF", you are surely in for a "real good time", with HIM.It may not be immediately, but it's certain. 👉They took God's people for granted-1Sam.2:13-16. The unconventional,nay, shameful actions of Eli's sons did hurt God's people consistently,and in the process, brought separation between God and HIS children. Today, aren't people discouraged with the consistent unsavory reports emanating from the church daily? The truth even though bitter, remains that; just like Eli's sons, ministers who should know better,are leading God's people into sin, condoning evils,as long as there is a fat envelope, living reckless lives, sleeping with women in the church,and in some cases, even boasting with it. Do we know at all, that it's customary for a lot of people to pattern their life after the example of a "Man of God"? Now, just imagine how many souls have lost favor with their God,all because of bad leadership from one whom they trusted so much, one whom they believe must always be right! Conclusively, the most painful angle to this tragedy, was that,Eli and sons were not ready to repent (1Sam.2:25,1Jn.1:8-9)! The seed has developed a tap root, to uproot was a problem.They were already used to having their way! AND THEY(G.O.AND HIS TWO SONS) DIED ON THE SAME DAY. Indeed, Phinehas pregnant wife on hearing the news,went into forced labour and named the child*ICHABOD* meaning,the GLORY OF GOD HAS DEPARTED(1 SAM 4:21) If a man sins against a man, God will mediate for him; but if a man sins against the LORD, who can intercede for him?" But they would not listen to the voice of their father; for it was the will of the LORD to slay them. (1Sa 2: 25) God couldn't condone their excuses anymore. Instead of Eli repenting,he daered God; So Samuel told him (ELI) everything and hid nothing from him. And he (ELI) said, "It is the LORD; let him do what seems good to him." (1Sa 3: 18 HAS THE GLORY OF GOD NOT DEPARTED FROM MANY OF OUR CHURCHES TODAY? Please, you and I, listening or reading this,"Do not react against the Word of God; but rather respond to it",that it may be well with us in Christ Jesus'Name,Amen.(Prov.28:13)🙇🙏!

THAT I MAY KNOW HIM (Phil.3:10)! 🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥 Theme: The Call To Righteousness (1Cor.15:34)! 🚥 🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥🚥 Today again, by His wonderful grace and mercy, I am once more beaming the searchlight on my constituency"The Church of God!" And this time, I intend to compare the church at"Shiloh" with our church of today! I do sincerely hope we will be more prepared by the lessons contain therein. ELI AND HIS SONS;AS AN ASSEMBLAGE TODAY'S CHURCH! (1Sam.2:12-17,22-25). ♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️ Anointing is a very important component of the Christian Faith.Indeed, it's what makes the difference between a God called pastor and a self called pastor.Either way,a great responsibility is attached to it. This is what Eli and his sons never realized,and in the process, not only did they destroyed themselves,but also effectively put and end to any hope of their lineage ever serving in the Temple again! Hophni and Phinehas(Eli's sons) were ordained pastors, but took the anointing for granted and misused it.And it's the same with what is obtained in the church today! In a greater percentage of our churches,if not all, anointing has become a commodity to be traded with. 👉The Scriptures called the sons of Eli *Sons of Belial* (1Sam.2:12,Lk.16:13.)54 d Now,Belial is the name of a demon. One may wonder why a pastor should be called the son of a demon.There is abundant proof that they attempted to serve two masters.You can't serve God and serve a demon simultaneously. Unfortunately, this is the position of the church today.When we say"demon",it mayn't be the actual demon per se, but it's symbolic here. Truly,many of us believers are unconsciously engaged in demon and mammon worship.For instance,many of us serve other gods like self, money, pleasure,ego, property(eg,car and buildings)and persons ,etc. Remember this, whoever we yield to is our master, i.e, anything that takes the place of God in our life,is our idol.We all have idols in different forms in our lives. For a majority of us, UNCONSCIOUSLY until someone who truly loves us, and at the cost of a shared relationship points them out to us. An example of this is PRIDE. Many of us may be highly disciplined, but UNCONSCIOUSLY, pride becomes an unseen partner leading to SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS. You don't have to agree. Don't forget I said, we all have our idols, perhaps we feel better calling them out weaknesses, idols are what really they are since they can take God's Place in our lives. The other day, when I spoke about some Fathers of the Reformation being UNSEEN IDOLS in the lives of some of us, only God knows what family members where thinking of me... Like, where did this guy got lost from. BUT THE TRUTH REMAINS THAT GOD CALLED HIS OWN ANOINTED PASTORS *SONS OF A DEMON* WHY? BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY DID... DISLOYALTY TO GOD. Truly,we all have our own idols in our hearts, either publicly or privately.We frankly need to seek assistance from God in order to come out clean from every pollution and adulteration! 👉They knew not the Lord;1Sam.2:12,Rom.1:28-32) Can it be said truly that Hophni and Phinehas didn't really know there's God? They certainly did,but chose LUST ABOVE GOD. We don't know God,if we don't obey Him. Their dad, *ELI* was the *G.O.* Yet, being pastors, they knew not the Lord.Bearing the title"Pastor", isn't what makes you one,but your intimacy with God. You know, it's possible to do God's Work, preach the gospel fantastically, and even work wonders without knowing HIM at all.In today's world, there's a mad rush for miracles, without caring how they come.And the devil has taken advantage of the situation.Thus pastors are trying to outshine themselves,in their lifestyles, without batting eyelids. Their interest isn't to please the Lord,no... not at all.They don't know HIM, not to talk of having a relationship with HIM.So you see, working of miracles (magic), doesn't prove one's intimacy with God.Nor does acrobatic displays on the pulpit turned podiums, or a good command of the English Language makes you a friend of Christ Jesus. Infact,HIS inner cabinet members were unlearned fishermen! Of course we know them. These unlearned fishermen recognized His Deity and their duties to Worship Him... These ones knew Christ Jesus. As God's emissary,and purposedly misrepresenting God to HIS children because of "SELF", you are surely in for a "real good time", with HIM.It may not be immediately, but it's certain. 👉They took God's people for granted-1Sam.2:13-16. The unconventional,nay, shameful actions of Eli's sons did hurt God's people consistently,and in the process, brought separation between God and HIS children. Today, aren't people discouraged with the consistent unsavory reports emanating from the church daily? The truth even though bitter, remains that; just like Eli's sons, ministers who should know better,are leading God's people into sin, condoning evils,as long as there is a fat envelope, living reckless lives, sleeping with women in the church,and in some cases, even boasting with it. Do we know at all, that it's customary for a lot of people to pattern their life after the example of a "Man of God"? Now, just imagine how many souls have lost favor with their God,all because of bad leadership from one whom they trusted so much, one whom they believe must always be right! Conclusively, the most painful angle to this tragedy, was that,Eli and sons were not ready to repent (1Sam.2:25,1Jn.1:8-9)! The seed has developed a tap root, to uproot was a problem.They were already used to having their way! AND THEY(G.O.AND HIS TWO SONS) DIED ON THE SAME DAY. Indeed, Phinehas pregnant wife on hearing the news,went into forced labour and named the child*ICHABOD* meaning,the GLORY OF GOD HAS DEPARTED(1 SAM 4:21) If a man sins against a man, God will mediate for him; but if a man sins against the LORD, who can intercede for him?" But they would not listen to the voice of their father; for it was the will of the LORD to slay them. (1Sa 2: 25) God couldn't condone their excuses anymore. Instead of Eli repenting,he daered God; So Samuel told him (ELI) everything and hid nothing from him. And he (ELI) said, "It is the LORD; let him do what seems good to him." (1Sa 3: 18 HAS THE GLORY OF GOD NOT DEPARTED FROM MANY OF OUR CHURCHES TODAY? Please, you and I, listening or reading this,"Do not react against the Word of God; but rather respond to it",that it may be well with us in Christ Jesus'Name,Amen.(Prov.28:13)🙇🙏!

It Is Time for Freedom of Speech in the Freedom Movement We need to be disciplined enough to be present with the discomfort that comes with disagreement as we listen and communicate about all the critical issues of the day with each other~ Dr. Peter and Ginger Breggin There, in my inbox, was another substack essay on nanotechnology….a thoughtful, serious piece discussing why we should not fall for the concept that nanotechnology can actually control human behavior and thought or the way that human beings conduct themselves. The discussion made a lot of sense. And so do the microscopists — those scientists, including chemists, pathologists, engineers, and others examining the “COVID vaccines,” the nanotechnology, the quantum dots, the “white clots,” the graphene oxide, and all else being found in human blood and various matter present in human injectables, ingestables, and breathables. [continue reading below] The dissenting author I read mentioned one of our other colleagues (colleagues being those fighters for freedom, liberty, biological integrity, health, science, and community). The dispute centered around the ability of any science to actually technologically control human thought. I winced as I read this. Not because I fully agreed or disagreed with either person, but because I knew human feelings would be stirred up, maybe hurt, maybe angered. Those feelings would swirl around the concepts of the debate, but also generally through the readers of each person and their colleagues. And those feelings can get in the way. Because the discussions, the disagreements, and the differences of view about the details and degrees of dangers are critical conversations. We should be having these conversations all the time. I am not going to parse that science debate in this essay in detail — that is for another time. I will say that the desire to control the thoughts and actions of others is a hallmark of dark “science” used by the Central Intelligence Agency and Department of Defense divisions as well as some aspects of medicine and psychology. From the early psychiatric ice pick lobotomies in the 1950s to the psychosurgery experiments at some of the highest academic centers in medicine, including Harvard, Brown, Tulane, McGill, University of Mississippi, Wayne State, and many more, there have been attempts to modulate, deter, and control behavior. Dr. Breggin devoted several years of his life to putting a stop to the psychosurgery resurgence that began in the late 1960s into the 1970s. The Desire to Control is not the Same as Being Able to Control Human Thoughts The desire to control human thoughts and actions is not the same as being able to control human thoughts and actions. At this point, “what science can do is damage the human brain through various means — surgical, electrical, energy wave frequencies, blunt force trauma, and drugs,” according to psychiatrist Peter Breggin MD. He explains that a human being can be stopped, subdued, or deterred, just as the furious bull was stopped in its tracks in the arena by psychosurgeon Delgado, through electrical shocks in 1963. It came to a dead stop, shaking its head. The brain-damaging effect of the shock had paralyzed the beast momentarily without actually changing or averting his desire to charge. The shock was the equivalent of being stunned by a blow to the head. Dr. Breggin has examined this issue further in his new essay “The Elite Strategy to Physically Ruin Our Brains, Minds and Willpower.” The Desire to Control May Lead to Attempts to Control We know the dark sciences and the deep state want to control people, populations, and “targeted audiences.” Whether or not they are successful, there appears to be little preventing them from attempting to establish control of people by inserting technology into their bodies, especially since there is such a delicious opportunity to experiment with inserting nanotech during the Great World Vaccination Drive of the COVID era. Why not drive the technology “forward” by seeing what human bodies can tolerate or survive in the way of foreign objects and substances? Who knows? If the objects and substances are small enough, maybe we can slip them by the body’s defenses? And who is to say no? The ethics division at the National Institute of Health is manned by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s wife. So it behooves us to ask questions, lots of questions. However, we must not succumb to the fear and terror propaganda that is certainly being salted into the mix of information we are consuming about possible mind manipulation. Those who wish to control us are using fear, promotion of false abilities, misdirection, and any other lies they can dream up to keep us frightened, intimidated, distracted, confused, and ineffective. So, what can we do? Team Freedom Needs to Speak Openly and Freely We, those of us who are on Team Freedom, need to be able to speak freely. To exchange ideas, data, and perspectives. We need to be disciplined enough to be present with the discomfort that comes with disagreement as we listen and communicate about all the critical issues of the day. We are on the cutting edge of politics, science, liberty, medicine, public health, sociology, psychology, public relations, and civics. We are all looking around corners, into back rooms, and examining issues, practices, and technologies that are being shepherded into our cultures, our bodies, and our environment over which we have had no say. We Have Had No Choice We have had no choice about whatever is in the injectable liquids that are contaminating various medicines, including what is coyly called the COVID-19 “vaccines.” We have had no choice about the substances put in our foods or our environments through geoengineering pollution or other forms of manipulations. We have had no choice about the use of energy frequencies like the 5G being launched. No choice about the littered landscape of Level 4 biolabs around the world. No choice about the engineered pathogens that definitely escape those labs from time to time, and no choice about whether they should be released upon the world for one reason or another. We have no choice about being a member of the United Nations or a member of the World Health Organization, and of sustaining them through our tax dollars. We aren’t being given any of these choices. Those topics are off the table, ‘Top Secret,’ ‘proprietary information,’ under “NDA” (non-disclosure agreement) or simply ‘embarrassing’ or a ‘distraction’ or a ‘trade secret.’ We have certainly had no choice about the manipulations of information that are being disseminated throughout our societies every day via the controlled media except to turn that media on, or off but much of it is impossible to avoid. We have had no choice about the Department of Defense (DOD), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and other alphabet agencies using psychological manipulation and propaganda to “win the hearts and minds” and if that fails, to control opinion and actions with foreign nations and foreign nationals. In reality, most of what goes on in the arena of experimentation on physical control of the mind is hidden behind the opaque Deep State curtain. Does the Deep State want to control? You betcha. Look back at the last four years. In country after country, especially the USA, all we see is control being exerted upon citizens, against tradition and constitutions. We have no say in whether the DOD and the CIA, the CDC, and the alphabets are directing their propaganda machines upon U.S. citizens. Are their propaganda activities in the U.S. ‘biting the hand that feeds them?’ NO? Then what hand is feeding them? Tell us, please. Are We Free Without Debate and the Free Exchange of Ideas? Push back. We must open our minds. Have lots of conversations, and lots of exchange of ideas, through essays, columns, via videos, zoom meetings, documentaries, debates, books, and live gatherings. We know personally that there are those among us who have been very engaged in trying to steer and stifle the debate. The thought-terminating concept is ‘do NOT speak about that subject — it will discredit you and ‘the movement,’ and you will look like a fool.’ Another deterrent that stifles debate is ‘don’t disagree — we need unity in the freedom movement.’ A very big threat that has thrown a terrifying poisonous cloud over all of us is the dread of getting sued for $25 million dollars. That is not freedom. That is control. You Will Look Like a Fool…. There is disagreement about whether censorship occurred in Stockholm during the “Pandemic Strategies: Lessons and Consequences” conference held January 21-22, 2023. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger was the last presenter for this conference, after which there was a closing panel made up of the afternoon group of speakers. That last panel included Astrid Stuckelberger, Geert Vanden Bossche, John Steppling (playwright), Pierre Kory, Richard Urso, Jessica Rose, and Philipp Kruse. Dr. Stuckelberger’s talk was titled “From Biology to Population: Evidence-Based Public Health Situations: Analysis, Lessons and Next Steps.” “Censorship occurred at point C when I presented the results of nanotech and oxide graphene in the vials,” she told SGT Report. Her slide asked, “Is the content [of the vials] biological or not?” It is reproduced below. Her primary point, as I understand it, is that the materials being found in the ‘COVID vaccines’ are non-biological in nature — they are synthetic biological matter. Therefore physicians examining and testing blood who are trained to view biological matter are going to miss the synthetic materials, both due to the small size and due to the compositions of the materials. Dr. Stuckelberger posted a video clip later sent to her by an attendee that shows Dr. Cole up on the stage after Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation. Though not listed on the final panel, Dr. Cole took the stage, gestured for, and was given a microphone by event organizers and then made “a real quick comment.” This was allowed even though Dr. Stuckelberger’s presentation was cut short by the organizers (they say because they were out of time). “From what we’ve looked at, there are no nano chips. There is absolutely no graphene oxide in the hundreds of vials we’ve looked at,” declared Dr. Cole. Turning to Dr. Stuckelberger, he declared, “I respect that you did a beautiful presentation,” which appeared patronizing or at least awkward. Dr. Cole said, “At the end of the day, to focus on freedom and focus on the wonderful freedom fight that we all have together is what matters. Other things are red herrings, and it’s not relevant, and it’s a distraction to our cause… Scientifically based on the analysis done, we respectfully disagree, having looked at what we’ve looked at as a group from Austria, as a group from the United States, and if we focus on freedom together, that’s what matters… but the rest of it makes us look a little like we are out there.” Dr. Richard Urso added, “The lipid nanoparticle messenger RNA is so dangerous itself – It’s the number one thing right now that we know, the data is there….it’s affecting DNA damage repair, its affecting toll-like receptors and viral immune surveillance, it’s doing the blood clotting, it’s doing a lot of the things we already know, we have the data on it…” (At 3:15 on the video) Doctors Cole and Urso both claimed “it’s not useful to our cause to put red herrings out there.” The shortened last panel gave each speaker three minutes to summarize their views, and then the organizers said Dr. Stuckelberger and another presenter could not present as they were out of time. She was handed the mic anyway, and she said “they are afraid of what I am going to say.” Then she said that we are living in an apocalyptic time. “Corruption is not new, it has been there for ages, and it is time that we see it. We must all strive to become autonomous again and create autonomous communities. I wish you will build happiness and find ways to heal yourselves with natural remedies, and there are some. Try to build community with others who have the same spirit and heart as you,” she concluded. Watch the videos. Look at the body language. Dr. Stuckelberger was body blocked by one of the local organizers, John Steppling, who loomed over her during Dr. Cole’s ‘explanation’ about why she should not present her data on the presence of nanotechnology in the blood. Dr. Kory came on stage and added his on-stage presence to the discussion. Doctors Kory, Cole, and Urso are among the pillars of Dr. Robert Malone’s medical juggernaut. The upshot is that Dr. Astrid Stucklberger was interrupted, distracted, or body-checked by at least four men, including Dr. Cole, Dr. Vanden Bossche, John Steppling, and Dr. Kory, who also made his presence known when joining the others on stage. The entire event was professionally filmed and posted online by conference organizers, the Swedish organization called The Doctors’ Appeal. The conference organizers also posted a two-page non-attributed paper titled “What happened at the conference.” The organizers assert that there was “no intent to censor Dr. Stuckelberger, nor place her in an awkward position at the end of her talk,” and they apologized “unreservedly for any animosity she may have experienced during the closing moments of the conference…” But key moments of the controversy are missing from the official recordings documenting the period directly after Dr. Stuckelberger’s speech was abruptly ended and the final panel was convened. Another video emerged and is available, memorializing some of the missing minutes where Dr. Cole took the stage to dismiss Dr. Stuckelberger’s comments. Sage Hana provides a good condensed version of one of the first post-conference interviews done with Astrid Stuckelberger by Dr. Jane Ruby, and offers some interesting observations in his “Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, Dr. Jane Ruby Highlights #1–Details of her Stockholm presentation subject matter” substack published February 4, 2023. We first learned of the incident from happening upon Dr. Ruby’s interview of Dr. Stuckelberger. Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Daniel Nagase Suppression of ideas also occurred during a November 3, 2021, Zoom call between a number of Canadian medical colleagues, including Emergency Room physician Dr. Daniel Nagase. Dr. Robert Malone, from the US, was also invited to participate in that group Zoom meeting. Here are [Dr. Nagase] timestamps for interesting segments. 40:30 Dr. Nagase: Backstory. 45:30 Dr. Nagase: Cancer and reverse transcriptase. 47:03 Dr. Malone: drops off call. 57.53 Dr. Malone: comes back cautioning against speculating about reverse transcriptase. 58:30 Dr. Malone: “We’re under intense pressure… we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we’re stating…not useful to speculate about things like integration [of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA] Dr. Malone was telling Daniel Nagase, MD, in effect, don’t talk about reverse transcription and DNA integration in that 2021 Zoom meeting. Dr. Malone interrupted and said, “We’re under intense pressure… we have to be super careful about our messaging and what we’re stating…[it’s] not useful to speculate about things like integration” [of DNA from reverse transcribed RNA]. Imagine. If scientists, analysts, and the public had been able to speak, discuss, and argue, about these dangers, questioning which contents might be in the COVID ‘vaccines’ without being interrupted and silenced by others purporting to be on the side of freedom, what might we have accomplished at that time in convincing others to NOT submit to the toxic ‘COVID vaccines?’ Trash-Talking on Twitter Former Vice President of Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, has been especially eloquent and outspoken about the elite’s global takeover via the World Economic Forum (WEF) and World Health Organization (WHO). Wide Awake Media reported: Former vice president at Pfizer, Dr. Mike Yeadon: The so-called “pandemic” was planned and coordinated in advance, by unelected globalist bodies like the WHO and WEF, as a pretext to deliberately depopulate the planet via lethal mRNA injections: “We’re facing something much worse than an alleged virus. The injuries to people from these so-called vaccines… I wish I could tell you that it was accidental, but it wasn’t accidental. I’m convinced that these injections have been made to injure people, to maim and kill deliberately.” Source: TRUTH BE TOLD RALLY | London | March 25 | 1pm CET | 8am EST | Parliament Square | Childrens Health Defense In his comment, Dr. Yeadon echoed what many others have been saying and offering evidence about for some time. Dr. Malone tweeted back: “Show me the receipts or go home. Yeadon can talk like that all day long and get lots of clicks and likes. Preaching to the choir. But all it does is delegitimizes him with the persuadable middle. Do we want to win this, or are we just playing tiddlywinks? Proof or shut up.” Dr. Malone’s insults toward Dr. Yeadon should be no surprise, given that he has so often attempted to silence or sully other freedom fighters, including Peter Breggin, MD, Ginger Breggin, Dr. Jane Ruby, Peter McCullough, MD, Harvey Risch, MD, Dr. Paul Alexander, The Wellness Company, Red State Media, America Out Loud, other independent journalists, Dr. Brian Ardis, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Foster Colson, Clay Clark, Alex Berenson and others. Since 2022, Dr. Malone has increased his attacks involving much of The Wellness Company, Dr. Alexander, additional independent journalists, and reformers. Dr. Alexander himself has exposed two key instances where Dr. Malone maligned and discouraged others from having relationships with Dr. Peter Breggin – once when standing in the halls of the U.S. Senate prior to testimony, and once in a Brownstone email list among Brownstone members. Epidemiologist Paul Alias Alexander, Ph.D., is a Former Senior Advisor to Trump’s COVID Task Force and Former Advisor to WHO. He has courageously revealed in a recent substack column that during the Senate hearing that brought some of the top COVID critical scientists together, Dr. Malone was denigrating Dr. Peter Breggin, who was not present. Dr. Alexander reported: “I personally heard him, Malone, at a Senate meeting in Washington D.C. verbally ridiculing and smearing the Breggins to other scientists present. They were not there to defend themselves as he bragged about his lawsuit of $25 million against Dr. Peter Breggin and what he was doing against them. We run in similar circles. I was surprised he would do that in the Senate building (we were called there by Senator Johnson to discuss COVID and issues), and he was talking about his lawsuit on [the] Breggins as if it were a joke and a game, a sport, with listeners standing around enjoying a laugh. He poisoned the well, so to speak. He was trying to get the listeners to agree with him, yet they had no idea about the minutia. He was bragging, and it repulsed me. A joke on Dr. Breggin, who has done more for America and this movement than Malone could ever do?” [italics added.] The Biggest “Don’t Talk About That” Action The biggest “Don’t talk about that” action to date has been the $25 million dollar lawsuit against Peter R. Breggin MD, Ginger Ross Breggin, and Dr. Jane Ruby. The threats of a lawsuit and the official demand letter centered around an intellectual sociological/psychological debate of the validity of the so-called ‘Mass Formation’ or Mass Formation Psychosis concept, which we will be revisiting again in a separate column. The lawsuit complaint itself morphed into a litany of false allegations of defamatory statements. Some of the statements Malone attributed to Dr. Breggin were never uttered by Dr. Breggin. And none of the statements were defamatory. See our legal response and our amended response. We should all be aware at this time, four years into the takeover of the world, that those of us opposing the takeover are on the ‘outside.’ We are not part of the Good Club — the elite collection of billionaires and other entities who are implementing plans for controlling the world. We Can Do Science, Civics, Politics, Community, and Medicine the FREEDOM Way Whether you discuss nanotechnology or some other aspect critical of the official narrative, you are on the ‘outside.’ To those who are thinking about toeing the line set by the authorities, if you oppose masks, if you oppose lockdowns, if you mention ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, you are on the outside. You are on the outside if you are opposing the so-called COVID vaccines. So let’s embrace freedom. We can do science, civics, politics, community, medicine the FREEDOM way. Through debate, disagreement, challenging, arguing, and discussing. Be very suspicious of anybody trying to steer the conversation….of anybody trying to shut the discussion down, of anybody trying to grab the microphone when it is not their turn. Humanity is at risk. Be bold, be courageous, speak up…and listen to each other. We are not free, if we cannot speak freely. Find us at Twitter: @GingerBreggin @AmericanMD Find us at our website: www.Breggin.com Find us at www.AmericaOutLoud.com Find us on Substack at: Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators Find our legal defense fund here: GiveSendGo - Dr Peter and Ginger Breggin Legal Defense https://substack.com/home/post/p-138198485

Open Heavens Daily Devotional Pst E. A. Adeboye Saturday November 18 2023 Topic: BY THEIR FRUITS Memorise: Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Matthew 7:16 Read: Matthew 7:16-23 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. Message: Yesterday, we discussed the fact that when you are pure in heart, it will show on the outside. The state of your heart - whether pure or otherwise, will always show on the outside. For example, when people see you dressed like a harlot or hooligan, they would know what is inside. Many people parade themselves as children of God but dress and talk like people of the world (1 John 2:15). When you call yourself light but are looking, sounding and moving like darkness, we know that you are not who or what you claim to be (2 Corinthians 6:14). 2 Corinthians 5:17 says: Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. Right from the inside to the outside, all things become new when a person receives Christ - not all things apart from the fashion sense or speech; "all things" means all things. When you change from the inside, it will show in every aspect of your life because the change is from the core of your being. When you see a Chinese man and a Yoruba man, you can clearly differentiate them by how they look, their language and the food they eat. You don't need to be told; you just know based on the fruits you see. When people see you, can they recognize the DNA of Christ in you? If they have to ask whether you are a child of God or not, then check well to see if you are a true Christian. Some Pastors think that to convert youths to Christ, they must dress and behave like them; not at all. The youths want someone disciplined enough to challenge them. They want to show youthful exuberance, with the expectation that their pastor would caution them. Unfortunately, the people they are looking up to for that discipline are the same ones coming down to their level. Check the way the seemingly unruly youths treat the disciplined ones: that will tell you that they value discipline. Why should you now want to be like the unruly ones? That must change. Key Point: Let others see Jesus in you. Bible in one year: Acts 16-17 Hymn 30 When We Walk With The Lord 1. When we walk with the Lord, In the light of His word, What a glory He sheds on our way! While we do His good will He abides with us still, And with all who will trust and obey. Chorus Trust and obey! For there’s no other way, To be happy in Jesus, But to trust and obey. 2. Not a shadow can rise, Not a cloud in the skies, But His smile quickly drives it away; Not a doubt nor a fear, Not a sigh nor a tear, Can abide while we trust and obey. 3. Not a burden we bear, Not a sorrow we share But our toil He doth richly repay; Not a grief nor a loss, Nor a frown nor a cross, But is blest if we trust and obey. 4. But we never can prove, The delights of His love, Until all on the altar we lay, For the favour He shows, And the joy He bestows, Are for them who will trust and obey. 5. Then in fellowship sweet We will sit at His feet, Or we’ll walk by His side in the way, What He says we will do, Where He sends we will go, Never fear, only trust and obey.

Image Source: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/#someeofficial #proofofbrain #bitcoincash #bitcoin #pob Miguel was an aspiring entrepreneur with big dreams of achieving financial independence. He had heard about the phenomenon called Bitcoin and the potential it held for lucrative investments. Intrigued by the concept, Miguel decided to take a leap of faith and invest his hard-earned savings into this digital currency. It was a risky move, but Miguel believed in the power of innovation and saw the potential in cryptocurrencies. He studied the market diligently, analyzing trends, and staying up-to-date with the latest news. Miguel's dedication and determination led him to make informed decisions about his investments. As time went by, the value of Bitcoin started to rise steadily. Miguel's initial investment began to yield substantial returns. He remained patient and disciplined, never letting temporary fluctuations deter him from his long-term goals. With each passing day, Miguel's investment grew, and he became more confident in his decision. Word of Miguel's success soon spread among his friends and family. They were astonished by the profits he was making through Bitcoin. Some were skeptical, dismissing it as a passing trend, while others grew curious and eager to learn more. Miguel decided to share his knowledge and experiences with them, urging caution and thorough research before venturing into the world of cryptocurrencies. Inspired by Miguel's success, his younger brother, Carlos, decided to follow in his footsteps. Carlos had always admired his older brother and believed in his instincts. He sought guidance from Miguel, who patiently mentored him through the intricacies of Bitcoin investment. Together, they navigated the digital landscape, adapting to the ever-changing market conditions. As the years went by, Bitcoin continued to gain mainstream acceptance and popularity. Its value skyrocketed, creating millionaires and revolutionizing the financial landscape. Miguel and Carlos were among those who had the foresight and courage to embrace this new technology. Their investments flourished, enabling them to achieve financial freedom and pursue their dreams. Miguel's success story inspired many others, and he became a respected figure in the cryptocurrency community. He used his newfound wealth and influence to support various philanthropic initiatives, giving back to society and helping others realize their aspirations. Miguel understood that true success was not just about personal gain but also about making a positive impact on the world. Through their successful Bitcoin investments, Miguel and Carlos showed that calculated risks, patience, and a deep understanding of the market could lead to incredible opportunities. Their journey was a testament to the transformative power of technology and the rewards it could offer to those who dared to embrace it. And so, the story of Miguel and Carlos became a beacon of hope and inspiration for future generations, reminding them that with the right mindset, determination, and a dash of luck, even the most unconventional investments could lead to extraordinary success.

Emotions are everything.???? The easier we are swayed by it, the more we risk our capital.???????????? Stay disciplined and always stick to your rules.???? For more insights, follow us at www.fb.com/ikigaitraders

Emotions are everything.???? The easier we are swayed by it, the more we risk our capital.???????????? Stay disciplined and always stick to your rules #SoMee fam.???? For more insights, follow us at www.fb.com/ikigaitraders

Good morning #somee fam, self control is the ability for one to be disciplined, mature, watch what they say and learn to be on their lane minding their business. A person who cannot control himself cannot free himself. #awesme #thursday #self

Disciplined speculating is everything.✅

#SoMee Trading Insights ------------------------ Consistency is huge in trading success! Establishing a well-defined routine can help you stay disciplined and focused on your goals. Whether it's analyzing the market or reviewing past trades, make it a habit to stick to your trading routine.