• _São como duas faces de um mesmo espelho, refletindo a busca pela essência do ser e a conexão com o sagrado que habita em nós..._

    _Ao mergulharmos no silêncio da meditação, atravessamos as camadas da mente e tocamos a dimensão espiritual, onde a alma se reconhece como parte de um Todo maior..._

    _É nesse encontro que experimentamos a verdadeira unidade, onde o ego se dissolve e a luz interior se revela, mostrando que a jornada espiritual não é um caminho para fora, mas um retorno ao lar que sempre esteve dentro de nós..._
    .
    *Meditação e Espiritualidade com Débora Sievers no Meditantes PodCast #80 com apresentação de Domício Somariva Filho.*
    .
    Veja Aqui:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6ylFERE-ss&list=PLjXLCSmO7rtoAK616R1ErQ_yOmDmNvzk5
    .
    Meditantes News:
    https://meditantes.com.br/news/?p=3008
    .
    Playlist do Episodio:
    http://meditantes.com.br/podcast/80
    .
    .
    Acesse, assista, ouça, aproveite, curte, comenta, compartilha...
    .
    #meditação #meditation #meditación #meditante #meditantes #meditantespodcast #podcast #aovivo #online #viral #shantirham #meditar #medite #meditativo
    📝 _São como duas faces de um mesmo espelho, refletindo a busca pela essência do ser e a conexão com o sagrado que habita em nós..._ 📝 _Ao mergulharmos no silêncio da meditação, atravessamos as camadas da mente e tocamos a dimensão espiritual, onde a alma se reconhece como parte de um Todo maior..._ 📝 _É nesse encontro que experimentamos a verdadeira unidade, onde o ego se dissolve e a luz interior se revela, mostrando que a jornada espiritual não é um caminho para fora, mas um retorno ao lar que sempre esteve dentro de nós..._ . 🙏 *Meditação e Espiritualidade com Débora Sievers no Meditantes PodCast #80 com apresentação de Domício Somariva Filho.* . 🎧 Veja Aqui: 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6ylFERE-ss&list=PLjXLCSmO7rtoAK616R1ErQ_yOmDmNvzk5 . 🌏 Meditantes News:👇 https://meditantes.com.br/news/?p=3008 . 🎧 Playlist do Episodio: 👇 http://meditantes.com.br/podcast/80 . . Acesse, assista, ouça, aproveite, curte, comenta, compartilha... . #meditação #meditation #meditación #meditante #meditantes #meditantespodcast #podcast #aovivo #online #viral #shantirham #meditar #medite #meditativo
    0 Comments 0 Shares 277 Views
  • Many Manifestation programs come through the Internet, whenever I try to analyze one such. Everything I had gone through gave me almost the same feel. No sooner, I came across a weird trick called the Ultra Manifestation program.
    Ahoy there..! I am excited about sharing with you my in-depth Ultra Manifestation review. By scrutinizing my review, you can figure out whether buying this product can help you achieve good results. Listen..! Before I came across this product, I had witnessed and explored hundreds of Audio, Books, and Videos online that promised me transformative powers and life-changing results. However, the results remained almost the same. My life started to change after I came across the Ultra Manifestation code.

    Ultra Manifestation – Is It Based On science and proven Techniques?
    I was lured into making a purchase and more often than not, ended up disappointed with the results from the product. Why? They were just a scam! Nothing more. This is when I was first recommended to use the Ultra Manifestation guide. As you would expect, I was hesitant and skeptical about using the product. However, after repeated recommendations, I decided to give the product a try. This detailed Ultra Manifestation review documents my experience with the product and how it has managed to provide results for me. This can help you make a well-informed decision if you are considering giving this guide a try.

    you devote yourself to it. Additionally, there is an added bonus that you can claim which is available for a limited period of time.
    So what does the self-improvement book do? Like other similar books such as the Law of Attraction, the Secret, and others, the Ultra Manifestation guide also is focused on getting you in tune with the universe. By making simple changes in your lifestyle and devoting as little as 60 seconds each day, the book claims that you can get life-changing results in a very short span of time.
    The guide is centered around the theory that the way you think affects the universe around you. I know what you are thinking. This sounds similar to the law of attraction. That is because it is based around the same principle. However, the Ultra Manifestation guide has been backed by science and proven experiments over the years. The book says that the entire universe is created out of energy, and does not matter. In essence, it says that humans are also made of energy. That gives us the power to influence, interact, and modify the energy around us. Eventually, the right application can help you completely perceive the world around you and turn your life around.

    Who is behind Ultra Manifestation?
    The Ultra Manifestation website and guide is the brainchild of David Sanderson, who has himself overcome various personal challenges and obstacles to be a successful motivational speaker today. He first experienced the power of sound and quantum for healing by John Beckett which turned out to be the turning point of his life. David then went on to create the book Ultra Manifestation to help millions of other people who are still stuck in a mental rut and looking for a way out.

    Pros:
    ● Simple to follow – There is no complicated mantra that you have to follow in order to achieve results. Devoting as little as a minute every day can help you get positive results in a short span of time. I personally found it very easy to follow and implement in my daily routine.
    ● It really does work – Compared to the millions of other self-help books that I have tried, I’m surprised to say that the Ultra Manifestation book really works. After just a month of daily use, I was able to see visible changes in my life. To start off, I was able to sleep better. Additionally, I was more focused throughout the day and felt more motivated to pursue my targets and goals.
    ● Has a money-back guarantee – No amount of recommendations could persuade me to buy the product. It was the money-back guarantee that convinced me to give the book a try. There is a 60-day money-back guarantee with no strings attached in case you are not satisfied with the product.
    ● Affordable– Ultra-manifestation prices were quite affordable when compared to other “miraculous” self-help products on the market.

    Does Ultra Manifestation really work?
    I know that you were waiting specifically for this part. Does the product really work? Or is it just another scam?
    After using it religiously for over a month, I’m happy to say that the Ultra Manifestation guide works. This is what compelled me to write the ultra manifestation review in the first place. Additionally, I saw hundreds of other ultra manifestation reviews that boasted similar results.
    But the results are not tangible. It is an experience that you get. Whether it is your sleep patterns, the way you deal with stress, or your overall perception about life and the universe, you can expect a positive transformation while using this guide.
    The Total Money magnetism Frame of Mind:
    It’s a pretty well-known fact that most of our problems in life stem from financial and monetary sources. And success in every professional field according to the course is a result of one’s mindset and willpower.
    So, Total Money Magnetism taught Gina how to condition her mind using effective hypnotherapy techniques and principles to bring about a more positive outlook. Financial freedom is something that not just Gina, but we all seek, and that is why it’s imperative to have a ‘work hard, play less’ attitude.

    Its Basic Principles and Teachings:
    Steve G. Jones believes that you can yield effective results from anything you set your mind to. So if you genuinely concentrate on getting results from a particular aspect of life, may it be your job, love life, or even health, you can more often than not achieve it with the right attitude.
    There have been a lot of documented cases where people had healed themselves by virtue of their strong will power even when advanced medication did not work. Total Money Magnetism puts mind over matter and says that if they can do it, so can you.
    The course started out by teaching Gina that just like everyone, she too has the power to unlock the hidden potentials of the mind. And being able to achieve what seemed impossible at first, will depend on the amount of dedication that she puts towards it.
    Conclusion:
    So after reading this Ultra Manifestation review, the question will be is it worth investing in? Well, yes and no! No self-help book can work if you don’t want it to. At the core of the book lies the reader. So if you are not open about making changes in your life, it is best that you avoid buying the self-help guide.

    Click Here to Read More about “Ultra Manifestation”: https://tinyurl.com/3rcv2kbx

    #ultramanifestation #moneymagnetism #selfhelp #hiddenpotential #neuroscience


    Many Manifestation programs come through the Internet, whenever I try to analyze one such. Everything I had gone through gave me almost the same feel. No sooner, I came across a weird trick called the Ultra Manifestation program. Ahoy there..! I am excited about sharing with you my in-depth Ultra Manifestation review. By scrutinizing my review, you can figure out whether buying this product can help you achieve good results. Listen..! Before I came across this product, I had witnessed and explored hundreds of Audio, Books, and Videos online that promised me transformative powers and life-changing results. However, the results remained almost the same. My life started to change after I came across the Ultra Manifestation code. Ultra Manifestation – Is It Based On science and proven Techniques? I was lured into making a purchase and more often than not, ended up disappointed with the results from the product. Why? They were just a scam! Nothing more. This is when I was first recommended to use the Ultra Manifestation guide. As you would expect, I was hesitant and skeptical about using the product. However, after repeated recommendations, I decided to give the product a try. This detailed Ultra Manifestation review documents my experience with the product and how it has managed to provide results for me. This can help you make a well-informed decision if you are considering giving this guide a try. you devote yourself to it. Additionally, there is an added bonus that you can claim which is available for a limited period of time. So what does the self-improvement book do? Like other similar books such as the Law of Attraction, the Secret, and others, the Ultra Manifestation guide also is focused on getting you in tune with the universe. By making simple changes in your lifestyle and devoting as little as 60 seconds each day, the book claims that you can get life-changing results in a very short span of time. The guide is centered around the theory that the way you think affects the universe around you. I know what you are thinking. This sounds similar to the law of attraction. That is because it is based around the same principle. However, the Ultra Manifestation guide has been backed by science and proven experiments over the years. The book says that the entire universe is created out of energy, and does not matter. In essence, it says that humans are also made of energy. That gives us the power to influence, interact, and modify the energy around us. Eventually, the right application can help you completely perceive the world around you and turn your life around. Who is behind Ultra Manifestation? The Ultra Manifestation website and guide is the brainchild of David Sanderson, who has himself overcome various personal challenges and obstacles to be a successful motivational speaker today. He first experienced the power of sound and quantum for healing by John Beckett which turned out to be the turning point of his life. David then went on to create the book Ultra Manifestation to help millions of other people who are still stuck in a mental rut and looking for a way out. Pros: ● Simple to follow – There is no complicated mantra that you have to follow in order to achieve results. Devoting as little as a minute every day can help you get positive results in a short span of time. I personally found it very easy to follow and implement in my daily routine. ● It really does work – Compared to the millions of other self-help books that I have tried, I’m surprised to say that the Ultra Manifestation book really works. After just a month of daily use, I was able to see visible changes in my life. To start off, I was able to sleep better. Additionally, I was more focused throughout the day and felt more motivated to pursue my targets and goals. ● Has a money-back guarantee – No amount of recommendations could persuade me to buy the product. It was the money-back guarantee that convinced me to give the book a try. There is a 60-day money-back guarantee with no strings attached in case you are not satisfied with the product. ● Affordable– Ultra-manifestation prices were quite affordable when compared to other “miraculous” self-help products on the market. Does Ultra Manifestation really work? I know that you were waiting specifically for this part. Does the product really work? Or is it just another scam? After using it religiously for over a month, I’m happy to say that the Ultra Manifestation guide works. This is what compelled me to write the ultra manifestation review in the first place. Additionally, I saw hundreds of other ultra manifestation reviews that boasted similar results. But the results are not tangible. It is an experience that you get. Whether it is your sleep patterns, the way you deal with stress, or your overall perception about life and the universe, you can expect a positive transformation while using this guide. The Total Money magnetism Frame of Mind: It’s a pretty well-known fact that most of our problems in life stem from financial and monetary sources. And success in every professional field according to the course is a result of one’s mindset and willpower. So, Total Money Magnetism taught Gina how to condition her mind using effective hypnotherapy techniques and principles to bring about a more positive outlook. Financial freedom is something that not just Gina, but we all seek, and that is why it’s imperative to have a ‘work hard, play less’ attitude. Its Basic Principles and Teachings: Steve G. Jones believes that you can yield effective results from anything you set your mind to. So if you genuinely concentrate on getting results from a particular aspect of life, may it be your job, love life, or even health, you can more often than not achieve it with the right attitude. There have been a lot of documented cases where people had healed themselves by virtue of their strong will power even when advanced medication did not work. Total Money Magnetism puts mind over matter and says that if they can do it, so can you. The course started out by teaching Gina that just like everyone, she too has the power to unlock the hidden potentials of the mind. And being able to achieve what seemed impossible at first, will depend on the amount of dedication that she puts towards it. Conclusion: So after reading this Ultra Manifestation review, the question will be is it worth investing in? Well, yes and no! No self-help book can work if you don’t want it to. At the core of the book lies the reader. So if you are not open about making changes in your life, it is best that you avoid buying the self-help guide. Click Here to Read More about “Ultra Manifestation”: https://tinyurl.com/3rcv2kbx #ultramanifestation #moneymagnetism #selfhelp #hiddenpotential #neuroscience
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1008 Views
  • https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against?r=1p9ueh&utm_medium=ios
    https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/a-summary-of-the-evidence-against?r=1p9ueh&utm_medium=ios
    OPEN.SUBSTACK.COM
    A summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines
    Here's a quick summary of the key pieces of evidence that taken together show that the COVID vaccines are unsafe and that the medical community should not be trusted.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 268 Views
  • _O Yoga Sutra nos ensina que a Meditação não é apenas uma prática, mas um estado de ser — um estado onde os movimentos turbulentos da mente se aquietam, revelando a luz interior que sempre esteve presente..._
    .
    *Meditação e Yoga Sutra com Diego Koury no Meditantes PodCast #76 com apresentação de Domício Somariva Filho.*
    .
    Veja Aqui:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOENzTVP6hc&list=PLjXLCSmO7rtppZn0DLCJgFAYeSIqUEX17
    .
    Meditantes News:
    https://meditantes.com.br/news/?p=2864
    .
    Playlist do Episodio:
    http://meditantes.com.br/podcast/76
    .
    .
    Acesse, assista, ouça, aproveite, curte, comenta, compartilha...
    .
    #meditação #meditation #meditación #meditante #meditantes #meditantespodcast #podcast #aovivo #online #viral #shantirham #meditar #medite #meditativo
    📝 _O Yoga Sutra nos ensina que a Meditação não é apenas uma prática, mas um estado de ser — um estado onde os movimentos turbulentos da mente se aquietam, revelando a luz interior que sempre esteve presente..._ . 🙏 *Meditação e Yoga Sutra com Diego Koury no Meditantes PodCast #76 com apresentação de Domício Somariva Filho.* . 🎧 Veja Aqui: 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOENzTVP6hc&list=PLjXLCSmO7rtppZn0DLCJgFAYeSIqUEX17 . 🌏 Meditantes News:👇 https://meditantes.com.br/news/?p=2864 . 🎧 Playlist do Episodio: 👇 http://meditantes.com.br/podcast/76 . . Acesse, assista, ouça, aproveite, curte, comenta, compartilha... . #meditação #meditation #meditación #meditante #meditantes #meditantespodcast #podcast #aovivo #online #viral #shantirham #meditar #medite #meditativo
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2831 Views
  • US approves “historic” $20B arms sale to Israel, as Gazans die – Day 311
    [email protected] August 14, 2024 ben gvir, Bezalel Smotrich, ceasefire, free speech on campus, Iran, israeli gang rape, Josep Borrell, palestine olympics head, twins in gaza, weapons to israel
    Destroyed buildings last month in Beit Lahia, one of the northernmost cities in the Gaza Strip.Credit...Omar Al-Qattaa/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images (photo)
    More weapons for Israel; newborn twins killed in Gaza; Israel shoots American activist; two Palestinians killed in West Bank; Israel detains Palestine Olympic head; California mulls anti-free speech on campus bill; Ben Gvir leads provocative march on Temple Mount; EU leader calls for sanctions against Israeli Smotrich for calls to starve Gazans; house arrest for gang-rape suspects; yes, Netanyahu has been messing with ceasefire details;

    Iran says Europe’s silence on “inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged Israel to continue atrocities while threatening global peace; more.

    By IAK staff, from reports.

    US State Department Approves Over $20 Billion Arms Package for Israel

    AntiWar reports: On Tuesday, the State Department approved a series of potential weapons sales to Israel worth over $20 billion that includes F-15 fighter jets and tank munitions. The approval comes as Israeli airstrikes continue to slaughter civilians in Gaza, including newborn twins who were killed hours before the State Department announced the new support for Israel.

    Ha’aretz reports the transaction as “among the most significant arms sales to Israel in American history.”

    In total, the US announced five new arms deals for Israel. The biggest is for 50 F-15 fighter jets and related equipment, worth $18.8 billion. Israel will also receive $102.5 million in advanced air-to-air missiles, about 33,000 120mm tank cartridges worth $774 million, 50,000 high-explosive 120mm mortar rounds worth $61.1 million, and $583.1 million worth of medium tactical vehicles.

    It’s unclear how much of the massive weapons sale will be funded by US military aid. The announcement came a few days after the State Department said it was releasing $3.5 billion in military assistance for Israel in the form of Foreign Military Financing, a program that gives foreign governments money to buy US weapons.

    It will take years before the F-15s and other weapons will be delivered to Israel, although, according to Reuters, the tank rounds would be almost immediately available for delivery. The notification begins a period where Congress could potentially block the sales, but it’s expected to breeze through since only a few dozen progressive Democrats are opposed to arming Israel.

    The U.S. has sent Israel more than 10,000 highly destructive 2,000-pound bombs and thousands of Hellfire missiles since the start of the Gaza war in October, U.S. officials told Reuters in June.

    RECOMMENDED READING: Rafah attack: Netanyahu’s lies expose the truth about Israel

    An Israeli soldier carries a 155mm artillery shell near a self-propelled howitzer deployed at a position near the border with Lebanon in the upper Galilee region of northern Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo: Jalaa Marey/AFP via Getty Images)
    An Israeli soldier carries a 155mm artillery shell near a self-propelled howitzer deployed at a position near the border with Lebanon in the upper Galilee region of northern Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo: Jalaa Marey/AFP via Getty Images) (photo)
    Newborn twins killed in Israeli strike in Gaza as father collects their birth certificates

    Andalou Agency reports: Newborn twins were killed in an Israeli airstrike in the central Gaza Strip on Tuesday as their father went to collect their birth certificates.

    The two babies were born on Saturday in the city of Deir al-Balah, but an Israeli strike on their apartment shattered the family’s joy of their newborns.

    “I have just obtained the birth certificates for my newborn babies Aysel and Asser,” their father Mohammad Abu al-Qumsan told Anadolu as tears rolled down his cheeks.

    “They were born on August 10. I was outside the house, finalizing the paperwork, and then I got the call… I didn’t expect to find them all gone.”



    Israeli hardliner Ben-Gvir “put lives at risk” with Jerusalem prayer call

    Reuters reports: Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on Tuesday visited the Al-Aqsa mosque compound known to Jews as Temple Mount, and said Jews should be allowed to pray there, freshly challenging rules covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly denied there would be any change to rules prohibiting Jews from praying at the site, which is holy to Muslims as well.

    The Al-Aqsa compound, revered by Jews as a vestige of their two ancient temples, is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and under rules dating back decades, Jews are allowed to visit, but may not pray there.

    “Our policy is to allow prayer,” Ben-Gvir said as he passed a line of Jewish visitors who prostrated themselves on the ground, while others sang and clapped their hands in celebration. The Waqf, the foundation that administers the site, said around 2,250 Jews entered the site on Tuesday.

    The spokesperson for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced Ben-Gvir’s visit as a “provocation” and called on the U.S. to intervene “if it wants to prevent the region from exploding in an uncontrollable manner”.

    HA’ARETZ ADDS: What happened on the Temple Mount Tuesday categorically puts lives at risk, and is further evidence of the chaos being caused by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and his irresponsible leadership.

    National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and another minister ascended the Temple Mount (known as Al-Aqsa to Muslims), and dozens of Jewish visitors prayed on the compound in violation of the status quo. All this happened in front of the police who were stationed there, but they refrained from enforcing the ban on Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount.

    The fact that Ben-Gvir oversees the police doubles the threat he poses, because the police exist in part to deal with criminals like him. But when the criminal is the very minister in charge of the police, who can you turn to? When the person endangering national security is the minister in charge of preserving it, what do you do?

    And the helplessness becomes absolute when you realize the prime minister can’t be relied upon in this situation, since Netanyahu is the one who appointed Ben-Gvir despite very well knowing that he is dangerous.


    An American was just shot in the West Bank. The American press can’t be bothered.

    DropSite News reports: Last Friday, Amado Sison, an activist from New Jersey with the solidarity group Faz3a, joined fellow demonstrators near the West Bank village of Beita. In an interview with Drop Site after being discharged from the hospital, Sison said he was taking part in a “protective presence” exercise aimed at defending Palestinian citizens living in the West Bank from settler and military violence.

    “The Palestinians were holding a rally and doing chants, when Israeli soldiers at a nearby outpost started shooting tear gas and aiming weapons at us,” said Sison. “

    This was only my second demonstration, but some of the more experienced demonstrators shouted that live rounds were being fired and everyone began to run.”

    Sison and others ran from the gunfire into a nearby olive grove. It was then that he felt a “blunt impact” in the back of his leg. He initially thought he had been hit by a tear gas canister.

    It turned out to have been a live bullet, which entered his thigh and exited from the front of his leg.

    In video of the incident taken by Anthony C., an activist with Faz3a, and provided to Drop Site, a group of protesters and local Palestinians can be seen screaming as they attempt to carry a wounded Sison to safety after the shooting.

    (Read the full article here.)

    West Bank: Two Palestinian young men killed by Israeli forces

    WAFA reports: A Palestinian teenager succumbed to serious wounds he sustained earlier Tuesday after being shot by Israeli occupation forces in the town of Anata, east of occupied Jerusalem.

    The Jerusalem Governorate Media Department said in a statement that Shadi Wisam Shehada, 17, was shot by the Israeli occupation in the town of Anata while he was working at his privately-owned car wash shop in the area, for allegedly throwing stones at the occupation soldiers.

    Another Palestinian young man, Moataz Sarsour, was shot and killed by Israeli occupation forces during a raid on the cities of Ramallah and Al-Bireh at Tuesday dawn.

    Shadi Wisam Shehada and Moataz Sarsour, killed by Israeli forces
    Shadi Wisam Shehada and Moataz Sarsour, killed by Israeli forces (photo)
    Israeli authorities detain head of the Palestine Olympic Committee

    Middle East Eye reports: Jibril Rajoub, who is also a member of Fatah’s Central Committee, was reportedly detained by Israeli authorities upon his return from the Paris Olympics while en route to the occupied West Bank.

    The 71-year-old was searched, had his passport confiscated, and was summoned for questioning at the Ofer military compound near Ramallah on Tuesday.

    Rajoub has previously faced threats of imprisonment from some members of the Israeli government due to his efforts to have Israel barred from the Olympics and the football World Cup, citing violations of the Olympic Charter and FIFA regulations against apartheid in sports.

    In May, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz threatened to revoke Rajoub’s travel pass.

    “We will work to thwart his plans, and if he doesn’t stop, we will imprison him in the Muqataa [presidential compound in Ramallah], where he will be left to play stanga by himself between the walls,” Katz said, referring to a popular Israeli street game involving a football.

    Anti-free speech California bill inspired by opposition to pro-Palestine campus protest

    The Intercept reports: A bill making its way through the California legislature would stifle free speech on public university and college campuses, specifically around protests against Israel’s war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestine, according to civil rights advocates.

    The American Civil Liberties Union in California is ringing the alarm bell on Senate Bill 1287, saying that it will “set a dangerous precedent of chilling speech on campuses across the state.”

    The bill, introduced in February by Democratic state Sen. Steve Glazer, would require schools to adopt and enforce rules against harassment, discrimination, or any behavior that “creates a hostile environment on campus.”

    The bill’s supporters include a host of pro-Israel advocacy groups. [Glazer has made many trips to Israel and lived in Israel for six months working on a kibbutz.]

    Among the bill’s most vocal detractors has been ACLU California Action, which said in a letter sent last week to Glazer’s office that the bill would suppress free speech. In the letter, obtained by The Intercept, the ACLU highlighted areas of the bill that are “overly broad” and vague, such as leaving terms like “harassment,” “discrimination,” and “hostile environment” with no clear definitions that may allow institutions to apply them in ways that prohibit students’ free speech.

    Across the U.S., lawmakers on the state and federal level have introduced bills cracking down on campus protests. In Congress, Republican lawmakers proposed a slate of bills, including measures that would revoke visas and deport any international student convicted of a crime related to protests on campus; bar students convicted of a protest-related crime from receiving financial aid; make federal accreditation and funding for schools contingent on their policies toward protests; barring a student of faculty member from student loan forgiveness if they are expelled or fired due to protests; and withholding federal funds from schools that don’t clear encampments.

    Rep. Andy Ogles, a Republican from Tennessee who is behind several of the bills, also introduced one that would require a student convicted of a protest-related offense to do community service in Gaza for six months.

    (Read the full article here.)

    RECOMMENDED READING: Unmasking counterprotesters who attacked UCLA’s pro-Palestine encampment

    In early May, police arrested around 200 protesters from the anti-war encampment at UCLA, with the campus police restricting access to the area, and police helicopters hovering overhead.
    In early May, police arrested around 200 protesters from the anti-war encampment at UCLA, with the campus police restricting access to the area, and police helicopters hovering overhead. (photo)
    Iran says silence of UK, France, Germany on “inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged Israel to continue atrocities while threatening global peace

    The Cradle reports: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in a phone call that the silence of the international community in the face of Israel’s “unprecedented and inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged it to continue committing atrocities while threatening regional and global peace and security, IRNA reported on 13 August.

    Pezeshkian added that war in any part of the world is not in the interest of any country while emphasizing that a “punitive response to an aggressor is a legal right of states and a way to stop crime and aggression.”

    Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanaani issued a similar message Tuesday, saying the Islamic Republic will defend its national security and sovereignty and does not ask for permission to exercise its rights.

    Kanaani made the statement in response to a letter published by the UK, France, and Germany, urging Iran not to retaliate for the assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran on 1 August.

    The Foreign Ministry spokesman added that the three European countries have been indifferent to Israel’s continued “genocidal acts and war crimes against defenseless Palestinians.”

    He stated that the European nations’ request that Iran not respond to the Hamas leader’s assassination would “encourage the criminals to continue massacre, genocide, and crime against humanity.”

    The spokesman said if those mentioned countries were really after peace and stability in the region, they should stand against Israel and seek to end the war on Gaza and the killing of children and women.

    Israeli troops accused of gang raping Palestinian detainee released on house arrest

    The Cradle reports: The Israeli military attorney’s office and defense lawyers agreed on the release to house arrest of the five soldiers accused of raping a Palestinian man in the notorious Sde Teiman detention camp, Haaretz reported in Hebrew on 13 August.

    The Israeli army spokesman said the five soldiers will be released to house arrest for 10 days during the investigation.

    On 8 August, a leaked surveillance video from Sde Teiman was broadcast on Israeli news network Channel 12, showing the Israeli soldiers gang-raping the Palestinian man.

    Members of the Knesset and Hebrew media have strongly criticized the military for detaining the soldiers, arguing that it is morally acceptable to do anything to Hamas fighters, including rape.

    Military police officers who arrested the soldiers have faced death threats.

    Israel’s military advocate general, Major General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi responded to criticism over the arrests by saying they were crucial for shielding Israel from war crimes charges in international courts and ensuring continued weapons deliveries from the US and European nations.

    RECOMMENDED READING: Hostages of Israeli revenge in the Gaza Strip: Testimonies of 100 released Palestinian detainees reveal crimes of torture, cruel treatment.



    Documents confirm Netanyahu responsible for obstructing Gaza ceasefire

    New York Times reports: For weeks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has denied that he is trying to block a cease-fire deal in Gaza by hardening Israel’s negotiating position.

    Mr. Netanyahu has consistently placed all blame for the deadlocked negotiations on Hamas, even as senior members of the Israeli security establishment accused him of slowing the process himself.

    But in private, Mr. Netanyahu has, in fact, added new conditions to Israel’s demands, additions that his own negotiators fear have created extra obstacles to a deal.

    According to unpublished documents reviewed by The New York Times that detail Israel’s negotiating positions, Israel relayed a list of new stipulations in late July to American, Egyptian and Qatari mediators that added less flexible conditions to a set of principles it had made in late May.

    The documents reviewed by The Times make clear that the behind-the-scenes maneuvering by the Netanyahu government has been extensive — and suggest that agreement may be elusive at the talks set to begin this week.

    (Read more here.)

    Israel defense ministry expects 100,000 disabled veterans by 2030, half to be related to mental health

    Ha’aretz reports: A recent forecast by the rehabilitation division of Israel’s Defense Ministry expects there to be 100,000 disabled IDF veterans by the year 2030, with half being related to mental health.

    According to the data, since October 7 the rehabilitation division has seen 10,056 wounded individuals. The Defense Ministry is now discussing a strategy to absorb and treat those wounded in the war, on top of approximately 62,000 disabled IDF veterans already being treated by the division before the war.

    NOTE: Over 92,000 Gazans have been injured in just ten months – at least 3,000 children have had a limb amputated. Mental health issues are widespread, including nearly every child in Gaza.

    Josep Borrell calls for sanctions against Israeli ministers for ‘incitement to war crimes’

    The Cradle reports: EU Foreign Policy chief Josep Borrell [from Spain] said on 11 August that the bloc must consider imposing sanctions against Israeli far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich for “incitement to war crimes.”

    Borrell urged the Israeli government to clearly dissociate itself from individuals who incite war crimes and to work seriously towards a ceasefire deal.

    The high-ranking EU official also denounced Ben Gvir for urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to halt all humanitarian aid and fuel to the Gaza Strip amidst the ongoing genocide.

    Finance Minister Smotrich’s comments about starving two million Gazans by withholding aid in exchange for Israeli captives as “sinister,” in stark contrast to the Israeli minister’s assertion that the approach is “justified and moral.”

    MORE NEWS:

    IMEMC Daily Reports.

    The Guardian: Why should US troops pay the price for Biden’s failure to rein in Netanyahu?

    Mondoweiss: The ICJ finds that BDS is not merely a right, but an obligation

    +972 Magazine: In Jenin and Tulkarem, Israel’s war on Palestinian armed resistance is failing

    CNN: Rep. Ilhan Omar will win primary in Minnesota, CNN projects, breaking ‘squad’ losing streak

    STATISTICS OCTOBER 7 – AUGUST 13:

    Palestinian death toll from October 7 – August 13: at least 40,590* (39,965 in Gaza* – 11,445 women (30%), 16,251 children as of July 22. [The Ministry’s figures have been contested by the Israeli authorities, although they have been accepted as accurate by Israeli intelligence services, the UN, and WHO. These data are supported by independent analyses, comparing changes in the number of deaths of UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) staff with those reported by the Ministry, which found claims of data fabrication implausible.]

    This is expected to be a significant undercount since thousands of those killed have yet to be identified – and at least 625 in the West Bank (~145 children). This does not include an estimated 10,000 more still buried under rubble (4,900 women and children). Euro-Med Monitor reports 46,848 Palestinian deaths.

    Lancet: “Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death9 to the 37,396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza.

    Ralph Nader earlier estimated 200,000 Palestinians may have been killed in Gaza.

    At least 45 Palestinians have died in Israeli prisons (27 from Gaza, 18 from West Bank).
    At least 41 Palestinians have died due to malnutrition**.
    About 1.7 million, or 75% of Gaza’s population are currently displaced.
    2.15 million (out of total population of 2.3 million) are projected to face Crisis or worse levels of food insecurity.
    Palestinian injuries from October 7 – August 13: at least 97,714 (including at least 92,294 in Gaza and 5,420 in the West Bank, including 830 children). [It remains unknown how man Americans are among the casualties in Gaza.]

    Reported Israeli death toll from October 7 – August 13: ~1,486 (~1,139 on October 7, 2023, of which ~32 were Americans, and ~36 were children); 331 military forces since the ground invasion began in Gaza; 16 in the West Bank) and~8,730 injured.

    Times of Israel reports: The IDF listed 41 soldiers killed due to friendly fire in Gaza and other military-related accidents – nearly 16%.

    NOTE: It is unknown at this time how many of the deaths and injuries in Israel on October 7 were caused by Israeli soldiers.

    *Previously, IAK did not include 471 Gazans killed in the Al Ahli hospital blast since the source of the projectile was being disputed. However, given that much evidence points to Israel as the culprit, Israel had previously bombed the hospital and has attacked many others, Israel is prohibiting outside experts from investigating the scene, and since the UN and other agencies are including the deaths from the attack in their cumulative totals, if Americans knew is now also doing so.**

    Euro-Med Monitor reports that Gaza’s elderly are dying at an alarmingly high rate. The majority die at home and are buried either close to their residences or in makeshift graves dispersed across the Strip. There are currently more than 140 such cemeteries. Additionally, according to Euromed, thousands have died from starvation, malnourishment, and inadequate medical care; these are considered indirect victims as they were not registered in hospitals.

    † For most of the conflict, women and children accounted for about 70% of deaths in Gaza, with children making up a little over 40% of those killed, according to official statistics.

    Find previous daily casualty figures and daily news updates here.

    Hover over each bar for exact numbers.
    Source: IsraelPalestineTimeline.org
    Human rights reports on Israel-Palestine (regularly updated)
    Palestinians’ harrowing stories of rape by Israeli soldiers (including female soldiers)
    A Palestinian journalist visited Ismail Haniyeh’s home in Gaza to report on his death. Israel assassinated him too.
    I reported a piece for the New York Times on antisemitism. I found a major error, but the Times didn’t care.
    How Israel plans to whitewash its war crimes in Gaza
    Why the West Bank is on the verge of economic collapse
    Netanyahu’s plan to involve US in regional war on its behalf
    Western media continue to withhold the truth about Israel and Gaza – 4 stories
    “Well What SHOULD Israel Have Done After October 7?”
    Welcome to Hell
    More dead children. More BBC ‘news’ channelling Israeli propaganda as its own
    U.S. media downplays and ignores ICJ ruling declaring Israeli occupation illegal
    Israeli soldiers tell story of savage cruelty in Gaza – one given blessing by the West
    Searching for Gaza’s missing children
    What Would You Do With An Extra $320 Million?
    Assassination of Haniyeh an intentional, dangerous escalation – Parsi, Macgregor
    When Israel Burned Refugees Alive, Establishment Media Called It a ‘Tragic Accident’
    Israel has turbocharged West Bank housing demolitions under the cover of war
    Western media ignores Israeli confirmation of Hannibal Directive on 7 Oct
    US Should Arrest Benjamin Netanyahu When He’s in Washington
    Airwars investigation: Israeli airstrikes uniquely lethal (video)
    Hesen Jabr paid the price of conscience
    Gaza genocide denial
    Why the news media’s job is to groom us
    ‘Disappeared, buried, detained’: The horrors of Gaza’s missing children

    https://israelpalestinenews.org/us-approves-historic-20b-arms-sale-to-israel-as-gazans-die-day-311/
    US approves “historic” $20B arms sale to Israel, as Gazans die – Day 311 [email protected] August 14, 2024 ben gvir, Bezalel Smotrich, ceasefire, free speech on campus, Iran, israeli gang rape, Josep Borrell, palestine olympics head, twins in gaza, weapons to israel Destroyed buildings last month in Beit Lahia, one of the northernmost cities in the Gaza Strip.Credit...Omar Al-Qattaa/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images (photo) More weapons for Israel; newborn twins killed in Gaza; Israel shoots American activist; two Palestinians killed in West Bank; Israel detains Palestine Olympic head; California mulls anti-free speech on campus bill; Ben Gvir leads provocative march on Temple Mount; EU leader calls for sanctions against Israeli Smotrich for calls to starve Gazans; house arrest for gang-rape suspects; yes, Netanyahu has been messing with ceasefire details; Iran says Europe’s silence on “inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged Israel to continue atrocities while threatening global peace; more. By IAK staff, from reports. US State Department Approves Over $20 Billion Arms Package for Israel AntiWar reports: On Tuesday, the State Department approved a series of potential weapons sales to Israel worth over $20 billion that includes F-15 fighter jets and tank munitions. The approval comes as Israeli airstrikes continue to slaughter civilians in Gaza, including newborn twins who were killed hours before the State Department announced the new support for Israel. Ha’aretz reports the transaction as “among the most significant arms sales to Israel in American history.” In total, the US announced five new arms deals for Israel. The biggest is for 50 F-15 fighter jets and related equipment, worth $18.8 billion. Israel will also receive $102.5 million in advanced air-to-air missiles, about 33,000 120mm tank cartridges worth $774 million, 50,000 high-explosive 120mm mortar rounds worth $61.1 million, and $583.1 million worth of medium tactical vehicles. It’s unclear how much of the massive weapons sale will be funded by US military aid. The announcement came a few days after the State Department said it was releasing $3.5 billion in military assistance for Israel in the form of Foreign Military Financing, a program that gives foreign governments money to buy US weapons. It will take years before the F-15s and other weapons will be delivered to Israel, although, according to Reuters, the tank rounds would be almost immediately available for delivery. The notification begins a period where Congress could potentially block the sales, but it’s expected to breeze through since only a few dozen progressive Democrats are opposed to arming Israel. The U.S. has sent Israel more than 10,000 highly destructive 2,000-pound bombs and thousands of Hellfire missiles since the start of the Gaza war in October, U.S. officials told Reuters in June. RECOMMENDED READING: Rafah attack: Netanyahu’s lies expose the truth about Israel An Israeli soldier carries a 155mm artillery shell near a self-propelled howitzer deployed at a position near the border with Lebanon in the upper Galilee region of northern Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo: Jalaa Marey/AFP via Getty Images) An Israeli soldier carries a 155mm artillery shell near a self-propelled howitzer deployed at a position near the border with Lebanon in the upper Galilee region of northern Israel on October 18, 2023. (Photo: Jalaa Marey/AFP via Getty Images) (photo) Newborn twins killed in Israeli strike in Gaza as father collects their birth certificates Andalou Agency reports: Newborn twins were killed in an Israeli airstrike in the central Gaza Strip on Tuesday as their father went to collect their birth certificates. The two babies were born on Saturday in the city of Deir al-Balah, but an Israeli strike on their apartment shattered the family’s joy of their newborns. “I have just obtained the birth certificates for my newborn babies Aysel and Asser,” their father Mohammad Abu al-Qumsan told Anadolu as tears rolled down his cheeks. “They were born on August 10. I was outside the house, finalizing the paperwork, and then I got the call… I didn’t expect to find them all gone.” Israeli hardliner Ben-Gvir “put lives at risk” with Jerusalem prayer call Reuters reports: Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on Tuesday visited the Al-Aqsa mosque compound known to Jews as Temple Mount, and said Jews should be allowed to pray there, freshly challenging rules covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly denied there would be any change to rules prohibiting Jews from praying at the site, which is holy to Muslims as well. The Al-Aqsa compound, revered by Jews as a vestige of their two ancient temples, is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and under rules dating back decades, Jews are allowed to visit, but may not pray there. “Our policy is to allow prayer,” Ben-Gvir said as he passed a line of Jewish visitors who prostrated themselves on the ground, while others sang and clapped their hands in celebration. The Waqf, the foundation that administers the site, said around 2,250 Jews entered the site on Tuesday. The spokesperson for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas denounced Ben-Gvir’s visit as a “provocation” and called on the U.S. to intervene “if it wants to prevent the region from exploding in an uncontrollable manner”. HA’ARETZ ADDS: What happened on the Temple Mount Tuesday categorically puts lives at risk, and is further evidence of the chaos being caused by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and his irresponsible leadership. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and another minister ascended the Temple Mount (known as Al-Aqsa to Muslims), and dozens of Jewish visitors prayed on the compound in violation of the status quo. All this happened in front of the police who were stationed there, but they refrained from enforcing the ban on Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. The fact that Ben-Gvir oversees the police doubles the threat he poses, because the police exist in part to deal with criminals like him. But when the criminal is the very minister in charge of the police, who can you turn to? When the person endangering national security is the minister in charge of preserving it, what do you do? And the helplessness becomes absolute when you realize the prime minister can’t be relied upon in this situation, since Netanyahu is the one who appointed Ben-Gvir despite very well knowing that he is dangerous. An American was just shot in the West Bank. The American press can’t be bothered. DropSite News reports: Last Friday, Amado Sison, an activist from New Jersey with the solidarity group Faz3a, joined fellow demonstrators near the West Bank village of Beita. In an interview with Drop Site after being discharged from the hospital, Sison said he was taking part in a “protective presence” exercise aimed at defending Palestinian citizens living in the West Bank from settler and military violence. “The Palestinians were holding a rally and doing chants, when Israeli soldiers at a nearby outpost started shooting tear gas and aiming weapons at us,” said Sison. “ This was only my second demonstration, but some of the more experienced demonstrators shouted that live rounds were being fired and everyone began to run.” Sison and others ran from the gunfire into a nearby olive grove. It was then that he felt a “blunt impact” in the back of his leg. He initially thought he had been hit by a tear gas canister. It turned out to have been a live bullet, which entered his thigh and exited from the front of his leg. In video of the incident taken by Anthony C., an activist with Faz3a, and provided to Drop Site, a group of protesters and local Palestinians can be seen screaming as they attempt to carry a wounded Sison to safety after the shooting. (Read the full article here.) West Bank: Two Palestinian young men killed by Israeli forces WAFA reports: A Palestinian teenager succumbed to serious wounds he sustained earlier Tuesday after being shot by Israeli occupation forces in the town of Anata, east of occupied Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Governorate Media Department said in a statement that Shadi Wisam Shehada, 17, was shot by the Israeli occupation in the town of Anata while he was working at his privately-owned car wash shop in the area, for allegedly throwing stones at the occupation soldiers. Another Palestinian young man, Moataz Sarsour, was shot and killed by Israeli occupation forces during a raid on the cities of Ramallah and Al-Bireh at Tuesday dawn. Shadi Wisam Shehada and Moataz Sarsour, killed by Israeli forces Shadi Wisam Shehada and Moataz Sarsour, killed by Israeli forces (photo) Israeli authorities detain head of the Palestine Olympic Committee Middle East Eye reports: Jibril Rajoub, who is also a member of Fatah’s Central Committee, was reportedly detained by Israeli authorities upon his return from the Paris Olympics while en route to the occupied West Bank. The 71-year-old was searched, had his passport confiscated, and was summoned for questioning at the Ofer military compound near Ramallah on Tuesday. Rajoub has previously faced threats of imprisonment from some members of the Israeli government due to his efforts to have Israel barred from the Olympics and the football World Cup, citing violations of the Olympic Charter and FIFA regulations against apartheid in sports. In May, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz threatened to revoke Rajoub’s travel pass. “We will work to thwart his plans, and if he doesn’t stop, we will imprison him in the Muqataa [presidential compound in Ramallah], where he will be left to play stanga by himself between the walls,” Katz said, referring to a popular Israeli street game involving a football. Anti-free speech California bill inspired by opposition to pro-Palestine campus protest The Intercept reports: A bill making its way through the California legislature would stifle free speech on public university and college campuses, specifically around protests against Israel’s war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestine, according to civil rights advocates. The American Civil Liberties Union in California is ringing the alarm bell on Senate Bill 1287, saying that it will “set a dangerous precedent of chilling speech on campuses across the state.” The bill, introduced in February by Democratic state Sen. Steve Glazer, would require schools to adopt and enforce rules against harassment, discrimination, or any behavior that “creates a hostile environment on campus.” The bill’s supporters include a host of pro-Israel advocacy groups. [Glazer has made many trips to Israel and lived in Israel for six months working on a kibbutz.] Among the bill’s most vocal detractors has been ACLU California Action, which said in a letter sent last week to Glazer’s office that the bill would suppress free speech. In the letter, obtained by The Intercept, the ACLU highlighted areas of the bill that are “overly broad” and vague, such as leaving terms like “harassment,” “discrimination,” and “hostile environment” with no clear definitions that may allow institutions to apply them in ways that prohibit students’ free speech. Across the U.S., lawmakers on the state and federal level have introduced bills cracking down on campus protests. In Congress, Republican lawmakers proposed a slate of bills, including measures that would revoke visas and deport any international student convicted of a crime related to protests on campus; bar students convicted of a protest-related crime from receiving financial aid; make federal accreditation and funding for schools contingent on their policies toward protests; barring a student of faculty member from student loan forgiveness if they are expelled or fired due to protests; and withholding federal funds from schools that don’t clear encampments. Rep. Andy Ogles, a Republican from Tennessee who is behind several of the bills, also introduced one that would require a student convicted of a protest-related offense to do community service in Gaza for six months. (Read the full article here.) RECOMMENDED READING: Unmasking counterprotesters who attacked UCLA’s pro-Palestine encampment In early May, police arrested around 200 protesters from the anti-war encampment at UCLA, with the campus police restricting access to the area, and police helicopters hovering overhead. In early May, police arrested around 200 protesters from the anti-war encampment at UCLA, with the campus police restricting access to the area, and police helicopters hovering overhead. (photo) Iran says silence of UK, France, Germany on “inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged Israel to continue atrocities while threatening global peace The Cradle reports: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in a phone call that the silence of the international community in the face of Israel’s “unprecedented and inhumane crimes” in Gaza encouraged it to continue committing atrocities while threatening regional and global peace and security, IRNA reported on 13 August. Pezeshkian added that war in any part of the world is not in the interest of any country while emphasizing that a “punitive response to an aggressor is a legal right of states and a way to stop crime and aggression.” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanaani issued a similar message Tuesday, saying the Islamic Republic will defend its national security and sovereignty and does not ask for permission to exercise its rights. Kanaani made the statement in response to a letter published by the UK, France, and Germany, urging Iran not to retaliate for the assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran on 1 August. The Foreign Ministry spokesman added that the three European countries have been indifferent to Israel’s continued “genocidal acts and war crimes against defenseless Palestinians.” He stated that the European nations’ request that Iran not respond to the Hamas leader’s assassination would “encourage the criminals to continue massacre, genocide, and crime against humanity.” The spokesman said if those mentioned countries were really after peace and stability in the region, they should stand against Israel and seek to end the war on Gaza and the killing of children and women. Israeli troops accused of gang raping Palestinian detainee released on house arrest The Cradle reports: The Israeli military attorney’s office and defense lawyers agreed on the release to house arrest of the five soldiers accused of raping a Palestinian man in the notorious Sde Teiman detention camp, Haaretz reported in Hebrew on 13 August. The Israeli army spokesman said the five soldiers will be released to house arrest for 10 days during the investigation. On 8 August, a leaked surveillance video from Sde Teiman was broadcast on Israeli news network Channel 12, showing the Israeli soldiers gang-raping the Palestinian man. Members of the Knesset and Hebrew media have strongly criticized the military for detaining the soldiers, arguing that it is morally acceptable to do anything to Hamas fighters, including rape. Military police officers who arrested the soldiers have faced death threats. Israel’s military advocate general, Major General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi responded to criticism over the arrests by saying they were crucial for shielding Israel from war crimes charges in international courts and ensuring continued weapons deliveries from the US and European nations. RECOMMENDED READING: Hostages of Israeli revenge in the Gaza Strip: Testimonies of 100 released Palestinian detainees reveal crimes of torture, cruel treatment. Documents confirm Netanyahu responsible for obstructing Gaza ceasefire New York Times reports: For weeks, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has denied that he is trying to block a cease-fire deal in Gaza by hardening Israel’s negotiating position. Mr. Netanyahu has consistently placed all blame for the deadlocked negotiations on Hamas, even as senior members of the Israeli security establishment accused him of slowing the process himself. But in private, Mr. Netanyahu has, in fact, added new conditions to Israel’s demands, additions that his own negotiators fear have created extra obstacles to a deal. According to unpublished documents reviewed by The New York Times that detail Israel’s negotiating positions, Israel relayed a list of new stipulations in late July to American, Egyptian and Qatari mediators that added less flexible conditions to a set of principles it had made in late May. The documents reviewed by The Times make clear that the behind-the-scenes maneuvering by the Netanyahu government has been extensive — and suggest that agreement may be elusive at the talks set to begin this week. (Read more here.) Israel defense ministry expects 100,000 disabled veterans by 2030, half to be related to mental health Ha’aretz reports: A recent forecast by the rehabilitation division of Israel’s Defense Ministry expects there to be 100,000 disabled IDF veterans by the year 2030, with half being related to mental health. According to the data, since October 7 the rehabilitation division has seen 10,056 wounded individuals. The Defense Ministry is now discussing a strategy to absorb and treat those wounded in the war, on top of approximately 62,000 disabled IDF veterans already being treated by the division before the war. NOTE: Over 92,000 Gazans have been injured in just ten months – at least 3,000 children have had a limb amputated. Mental health issues are widespread, including nearly every child in Gaza. Josep Borrell calls for sanctions against Israeli ministers for ‘incitement to war crimes’ The Cradle reports: EU Foreign Policy chief Josep Borrell [from Spain] said on 11 August that the bloc must consider imposing sanctions against Israeli far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich for “incitement to war crimes.” Borrell urged the Israeli government to clearly dissociate itself from individuals who incite war crimes and to work seriously towards a ceasefire deal. The high-ranking EU official also denounced Ben Gvir for urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to halt all humanitarian aid and fuel to the Gaza Strip amidst the ongoing genocide. Finance Minister Smotrich’s comments about starving two million Gazans by withholding aid in exchange for Israeli captives as “sinister,” in stark contrast to the Israeli minister’s assertion that the approach is “justified and moral.” MORE NEWS: IMEMC Daily Reports. The Guardian: Why should US troops pay the price for Biden’s failure to rein in Netanyahu? Mondoweiss: The ICJ finds that BDS is not merely a right, but an obligation +972 Magazine: In Jenin and Tulkarem, Israel’s war on Palestinian armed resistance is failing CNN: Rep. Ilhan Omar will win primary in Minnesota, CNN projects, breaking ‘squad’ losing streak STATISTICS OCTOBER 7 – AUGUST 13: Palestinian death toll from October 7 – August 13: at least 40,590* (39,965 in Gaza* – 11,445 women (30%), 16,251 children as of July 22. [The Ministry’s figures have been contested by the Israeli authorities, although they have been accepted as accurate by Israeli intelligence services, the UN, and WHO. These data are supported by independent analyses, comparing changes in the number of deaths of UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) staff with those reported by the Ministry, which found claims of data fabrication implausible.] This is expected to be a significant undercount since thousands of those killed have yet to be identified – and at least 625 in the West Bank (~145 children). This does not include an estimated 10,000 more still buried under rubble (4,900 women and children). Euro-Med Monitor reports 46,848 Palestinian deaths. Lancet: “Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death9 to the 37,396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza. Ralph Nader earlier estimated 200,000 Palestinians may have been killed in Gaza. At least 45 Palestinians have died in Israeli prisons (27 from Gaza, 18 from West Bank). At least 41 Palestinians have died due to malnutrition**. About 1.7 million, or 75% of Gaza’s population are currently displaced. 2.15 million (out of total population of 2.3 million) are projected to face Crisis or worse levels of food insecurity. Palestinian injuries from October 7 – August 13: at least 97,714 (including at least 92,294 in Gaza and 5,420 in the West Bank, including 830 children). [It remains unknown how man Americans are among the casualties in Gaza.] Reported Israeli death toll from October 7 – August 13: ~1,486 (~1,139 on October 7, 2023, of which ~32 were Americans, and ~36 were children); 331 military forces since the ground invasion began in Gaza; 16 in the West Bank) and~8,730 injured. Times of Israel reports: The IDF listed 41 soldiers killed due to friendly fire in Gaza and other military-related accidents – nearly 16%. NOTE: It is unknown at this time how many of the deaths and injuries in Israel on October 7 were caused by Israeli soldiers. *Previously, IAK did not include 471 Gazans killed in the Al Ahli hospital blast since the source of the projectile was being disputed. However, given that much evidence points to Israel as the culprit, Israel had previously bombed the hospital and has attacked many others, Israel is prohibiting outside experts from investigating the scene, and since the UN and other agencies are including the deaths from the attack in their cumulative totals, if Americans knew is now also doing so.** Euro-Med Monitor reports that Gaza’s elderly are dying at an alarmingly high rate. The majority die at home and are buried either close to their residences or in makeshift graves dispersed across the Strip. There are currently more than 140 such cemeteries. Additionally, according to Euromed, thousands have died from starvation, malnourishment, and inadequate medical care; these are considered indirect victims as they were not registered in hospitals. † For most of the conflict, women and children accounted for about 70% of deaths in Gaza, with children making up a little over 40% of those killed, according to official statistics. Find previous daily casualty figures and daily news updates here. Hover over each bar for exact numbers. Source: IsraelPalestineTimeline.org Human rights reports on Israel-Palestine (regularly updated) Palestinians’ harrowing stories of rape by Israeli soldiers (including female soldiers) A Palestinian journalist visited Ismail Haniyeh’s home in Gaza to report on his death. Israel assassinated him too. I reported a piece for the New York Times on antisemitism. I found a major error, but the Times didn’t care. How Israel plans to whitewash its war crimes in Gaza Why the West Bank is on the verge of economic collapse Netanyahu’s plan to involve US in regional war on its behalf Western media continue to withhold the truth about Israel and Gaza – 4 stories “Well What SHOULD Israel Have Done After October 7?” Welcome to Hell More dead children. More BBC ‘news’ channelling Israeli propaganda as its own U.S. media downplays and ignores ICJ ruling declaring Israeli occupation illegal Israeli soldiers tell story of savage cruelty in Gaza – one given blessing by the West Searching for Gaza’s missing children What Would You Do With An Extra $320 Million? Assassination of Haniyeh an intentional, dangerous escalation – Parsi, Macgregor When Israel Burned Refugees Alive, Establishment Media Called It a ‘Tragic Accident’ Israel has turbocharged West Bank housing demolitions under the cover of war Western media ignores Israeli confirmation of Hannibal Directive on 7 Oct US Should Arrest Benjamin Netanyahu When He’s in Washington Airwars investigation: Israeli airstrikes uniquely lethal (video) Hesen Jabr paid the price of conscience Gaza genocide denial Why the news media’s job is to groom us ‘Disappeared, buried, detained’: The horrors of Gaza’s missing children https://israelpalestinenews.org/us-approves-historic-20b-arms-sale-to-israel-as-gazans-die-day-311/
    ISRAELPALESTINENEWS.ORG
    US approves "historic" $20B arms sale to Israel, as Gazans die – Day 311
    Ben Gvir's provocative march on Temple Mount; Israel shoots US activist; Iran doesn't need West's permission to retaliate against Israel
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 23712 Views
  • The False Flag Trump Shooting
    Kevin Barrett, Senior EditorJuly 21, 2024

    VT Condemns the ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINIANS by USA/Israel

    $ 280 BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS INVESTED since 1948 in US/Israeli Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation Operation; $ 150B direct "aid" and $ 130B in "Offense" contracts
    Source: Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C. and US Department of State.

    by VT Editor Kevin Barrett via Substack

    When a violent, shocking, spectacular American-history-turning event occurs—examples include the sinking of the USS Maine and Lusitania, the attacks on US ships at Pearl Harbor or the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kennedy assassinations, and 9/11—history teaches us that things are seldom what they seem. All of those incidents, and more, were deceptions orchestrated by forces that stood to benefit. The schoolbook narratives of all of these events, and many more, are lies.

    The key that unlocks the truth is the Latin phrase cui bono: who benefits? In all of the above cases, a powerful faction that wanted war—call it the war party—orchestrated deceptions that enabled the wars they wanted.

    Does the alleged shooting of Donald Trump last Saturday fit that pattern? Like the others, it was a spectacular act of violence that, in retrospect, is likely be seen as history-changing:

    “The election is likely to be a landslide. This probably reduces uncertainty,” said Nick Ferres, chief investment officer at Vantage Point Asset Management, citing polls that showed a surge in support for Reagan after the attempt on his life.

    The weak counter-argument admits that the shooting significantly improved Trump’s odds, but those odds are not 100% since “nothing is set in stone.”

    The long and short of it is that those who want a second Trump presidency were the obvious beneficiaries of an apparently random event that, were it a PR stunt, would have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars to the Trump campaign. The iconic photo of Trump fending off the Secret Service agents tasked with whisking him away ASAP and shaking his fist defiantly as he yells “fight! fight! fight!” could not have been more perfectly scripted. Reality TV actor Trump has never been more in his element.



    Nor could the shooting have been more perfectly timed. It occurred at the ideal moment to interrupt the news cycle that was about to force Biden to step down in favor of a stronger Democratic candidate. And it happened in the best possible time-frame for energizing the Republican base—and taking the wind out of the anti-Trump media’s sails—just ahead of the Republican convention, which became a spectacularly unanimous coronation-by-acclamation.

    The “shot that winged Trump’s ear” was even luckier for Trump than for the world’s-worst-marksman who allegedly took it. Most obviously, it gave Trump some blood for the photo op. It also gave him the opportunity to put on an ear bandage that served as a sort of purple heart, or rather a white badge of courage, at the convention. If billion-to-one odds had not been defied, and the world’s-worst-marksman had just plain missed—or, vastly more likely, never been allowed to get off a shot—the whole thing would have fizzled and been forgotten, like the failed attempt against RFK Jr. last September. Indeed, of all human beings throughout all of recorded history, Trump may have been “the luckiest to have gotten shot.” Had he “turned his head at the wrong moment such that the bullet completely missed” he would face much better odds of spending the rest of his life in the big house rather than the White House…or of being actually assassinated, presumably by efficient and deniable means.

    Indeed, the “shot in the ear” was like another kind of shot we have been hearing a lot about—an inoculation shot. It inoculated Trump against further assassination attempts, including the professional kind that rarely miss. Prior to his miraculously lucky ear shot, Trump was vulnerable to being taken out by any of a long list of deniable methods available to his deep state enemies. They could have laced one of his diet cokes with an untraceable heart attack agent, poisoned his toothbrush as happened to J. Edgar Hoover, or had him shot in such a way as to keep him out of the White House rather than to put him in it. But in the wake of the “lucky ear shot” and apparent Secret Service breakdown that enabled it, if anything happens to Trump, his base will burn down the country. That ear shot quite likely saved Trump’s life, not to mention his political career.

    That the first serious amateur attempt on Trump’s life actually got off shots, and—mirabile dictu—winged his ear, providing hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars worth of PR for the Trump campaign, proves that Yahweh, or his agents, must have had a hand in it. On the assumption that Yahweh delegated the job to his agents, rather than just rolling up his sleeves and doing it himself, the question arises: “How did Yahweh’s agents manage to pull it off?”

    Some of my excitable friends will no doubt exclaim: “It was all done with crisis actors! Nobody really got hurt or killed!” They will troll the web for photographs that faintly resemble the gunman and his victim, point out that they are still alive, and claim they have proved that the whole thing was a hoax. Alternately, they will dig into birth, death, and social security records, as well as social and mainstream media, and claim that whatever they find isn’t enough to support the presumption that Thomas Matthew Crooks, Corey Comperatore (who died from a gunshot at the rally) and “a 57-year-old New Kensington, Pennsylvania, resident and a 74-year-old resident of Moon Township” ever existed.

    These are the people who insist that no planes hit the World Trade Center and that most or all of the 9/11 victims never existed. They think nobody really got hurt at the Boston bombing or the Las Vegas shooting or Sandy Hook. It’s all crisis actors, they say. False flaggers who stage violent events actually hate real violence, so they fake as much of it as possible…sometimes all of it.

    I am, to say the least, not convinced by those arguments. My study of spectacular, spectacularly deceptive deep state events suggests that the perpetrators generally manipulate perceptions of actual violent events, rather than simply staging fake ones. (The violent events, of course, are generally orchestrated or steered by the perpetrators.)

    If I were one of Yahweh’s agents…

    If I were a high-ranking member of the deep state who wanted a second Trump term, here’s how I would have done it.

    Get the necessary personnel on board. After looking at the extensive files on all relevant personnel, from Trump himself to Secret Service people to potential patsies, I would know who to approach and how to approach them. Here’s how I might approach Trump: “Don, the deep state faction that despises you currently has about an 80% chance of success, defined as keeping you out of the White House by either killing or disabling you or winning/rigging the election. The odds that you end up dead or in prison by the end of 2024 are over 60%. We need to significantly move the dial on those odds. There’s only one way to do it: You need to be ‘wounded’ in an assassination attempt that generates a spectacular, iconic photo, and riles up your base to the point that the Never Trumpers avoid taking you out for real.” “Gosh, Kevin…didn’t Nixon once say ‘that would be wrong’”? “Don, your enemies are absolutely ruthless. We have to be ruthless too. So here’s the deal: A lone nut who couldn’t hit the side of a barn is going to fire a few shots at a Trump rally, and one of them is going to supposedly ‘clip your ear.’ You’re going to flinch at the first shot, reach for your ear, hit the deck, and let one of our guys mess with that ear so that when you stand up, there’s blood. You’re going to take command as they try to drag you off, shake your fist, and say ‘fight fight fight.’ Can you remember those lines?” “Roger.” “And don’t worry about how you’re going to look when the first shot rings out, because you’ll know real bullets are flying so you won’t have to do much method acting.” (Then the same basic approach is used on anyone else who needs-to-know. Obviously, only people whose files reveal them to be strongly pro-Trump and ethically flexible are approached. If Trump, based on his files, is not ethically flexible enough to go along with a shooting that will likely hurt or kill one or two of his supporters, he’s told nobody will get hurt…and if and when he learns otherwise after the event, it will be too late. And if Trump is so ethically inflexible that he won’t do a fake shooting at all, which seems ridiculously unlikely, we’ll keep him out of the loop and find a way to shoot his ear with a BB or something from close range at the moment the first shot rings out.)
    Recruit a shooter who is a poor marksman from the MK-Ultra contingent. For extra insurance, give him a rifle with a bad sight. Stage a “Secret Service screw-up” to get him on roof and give him time to squeeze off several fruitless shots. (The odds that one of those random shots would actually kill or disable Trump are very low—vastly lower than the 60% odds Trump ends up dead or in prison by the end of the year if he doesn’t take the risk.)
    Look for places to hold Trump rallies with suitable buildings nearby.Set up contingency plans for three or four possible locations, like JFK’s killers did by having plans in place for Miami (canceled), Dallas (successful), and Chicago (unnecessary), according to James Douglass.
    Count on mainstream media’s distaste for “conspiracy theories”—and be ready to enforce it. Normally a plan like this would seem risky or impossible, because much of the media hates Trump and would love to destroy him by exposing his or his supporters’ crimes. But there are crimes, and there are crimes. Two-bit crimes like 30-year-old he-said-she-said alleged sexual assaults, paperwork screw-ups, and so on are fair game for media and prosecutors. But massive, horrifying political crimes are routinely covered up by media due to the taboo against “conspiracy theories.” So the odds that significant, influential mainstream media will expose the false flag are very low, and can be made lower by scouring the personnel files of all relevant figures in advance and being prepared to stop them if necessary, as was done to Paul Wellstone and Hunter Thompson after 9/11, and many dozens of JFK witnesses and journalists in the wake of the 1963 coup.
    But would the deep state even want a second Trump presidency?

    In the past, it has always been the war party that orchestrates this kind of deception. The Maine greased the skids for the Spanish-American war. The Lusitania greased the skids for US entry into World War I. Pearl Harbor singlehandedly enabled US entry into World War II, by flipping the massive anti-war majority into an equally massive pro-war one. The Gulf of Tonkin incident hugely escalated US involvement in Vietnam. 9/11 unleashed a series of wars for Israel that cost $7 trillion and killed millions of people.

    Interestingly, the JFK assassination, which led to both escalation in Vietnam and (more importantly) US support for Israel’s 1967 war of aggression, was not the only time that a US president has been inserted, by murderous deception, to enable war. The 1940 Republican convention was rigged, after the murder of the convention manager, to ensure that pro-war unknown Wendell Wilkie, rather than any of the other more plausible candidates (who were all antiwar) emerged as the candidate. Since any antiwar Republican would have easily beaten Roosevelt, the murderous insertion of Wilkie was a necessary step towards US involvement in World War II. (The story is entertainingly recounted in Gore Vidal’s The Golden Age.)

    But Trump?! He and his vice presidential candidate, J.D. Vance, are skeptical about Biden’s war on Ukraine. Isn’t Trump the peace candidate?

    In a word, no. Trump’s first term was a war presidency, even more than Obama’s. The Trump team: *Armed Ukraine to the teeth and flooded it with NATO advisors, setting the stage for the current war. *Assassinated Iran’s General Soleimani, a shoo-in to win that nation’s presidency, thereby almost setting off World War III. *Ratcheted up the covert US war on China, in part by attacking China with the COVID-19 anti-economy bioweapon. *Refused to withdraw from Afghanistan. *Refused to withdraw from Iraq and Syria despite demands from both governments. *Massively increased military spending. *Declared World War III against the world’s nearly two billion Muslims by approving Israel’s theft of territory, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, and generally obeying Netanyahu’s every order, setting the stage for the current genocidal war.

    If the deep state wants to cut its losses and shift the war front from Russia to China and/or Iran, Trump is the man to do it. Trump is surrounded by fanatics who, like the soon-to-be-pardoned Steve Bannon, believe it is the US’s destiny to defeat China in a hot war. And he is even more surrounded by even crazier fanatics who want to blow up the world in general, and Iran and its allies in particular, on behalf of the looniest wing of the Zionist genocide project.

    With a Democrat in the White House, Netanyahu has no hope of “finishing the job” of the genocide of Palestine. The massacre of a few million Palestinians, and expulsion of millions more, could only happen under the “fog of war” of an all-out US-and-Israel vs. Axis of Resistance confrontation. And that’s what Netanyahu has devoted his entire political career to engineering. He won’t get it without another Trump presidency.

    Regardless of the details, whether it involves turning Taiwan into China’s Ukraine, or joining Israel’s campaign against West Asia, America can’t mobilize for all-out war with a Democrat in the White House. Only a chest-thumping macho leader like Trump can infuse America’s fighting men (not women, sorry) with the necessary testosterone-fueled enthusiasm. Nobody with fighting spirit is going to sign up for Biden’s rainbow-flag-waving bisexual army. But Trump’s base will flock like lemmings to fight and die for the Orangeman waving the red-white-and-blue. So if you want war, big-time, you need Trump in the White House. End of story.

    Please convince me I’m wrong!

    I wish I were wrong about all of this. I wish Mike King, whose view of Trump almost rivals Q Anon’s, were right. I wish Trump were a real America First candidate, rather than an actor who plays one on reality TV. I wish he were the savior America needs, rather than a false messiah. I wish the “magic ear shot” were a real miracle from the universal God (as opposed to the bloodthirsty tribal idol Yahweh) whose purpose was to put a peace candidate in the White House.

    So go ahead, try to convince me. I want to believe you. Explain to me, in detail, why logic and evidence proves that the “magic ear shot” could not possibly have been orchestrated in the way I am suggesting, or another roughly similar way.

    I want to believe you. But the onus—the burden of proof—is on you. Given the historical context, we must assume that the “magic ear shot” event was an orchestrated deception, like its historical precedents, unless there is slam-dunk proof to the contrary. So please, drop that slam-dunk proof in the comments section! If you convince me, it will really cheer me up ; – )



    Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

    He is the host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard-driving weekly radio show funded by listener subscriptions at Substack and the weekly news roundup FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN).

    He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS, and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

    Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

    Archived Articles (2004-2016)

    www.truthjihad.com

    ATTENTION READERS

    We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
    In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

    About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
    Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

    https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/07/the-false-flag-trump-shooting/
    The False Flag Trump Shooting Kevin Barrett, Senior EditorJuly 21, 2024 VT Condemns the ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINIANS by USA/Israel $ 280 BILLION US TAXPAYER DOLLARS INVESTED since 1948 in US/Israeli Ethnic Cleansing and Occupation Operation; $ 150B direct "aid" and $ 130B in "Offense" contracts Source: Embassy of Israel, Washington, D.C. and US Department of State. by VT Editor Kevin Barrett via Substack When a violent, shocking, spectacular American-history-turning event occurs—examples include the sinking of the USS Maine and Lusitania, the attacks on US ships at Pearl Harbor or the Gulf of Tonkin, the Kennedy assassinations, and 9/11—history teaches us that things are seldom what they seem. All of those incidents, and more, were deceptions orchestrated by forces that stood to benefit. The schoolbook narratives of all of these events, and many more, are lies. The key that unlocks the truth is the Latin phrase cui bono: who benefits? In all of the above cases, a powerful faction that wanted war—call it the war party—orchestrated deceptions that enabled the wars they wanted. Does the alleged shooting of Donald Trump last Saturday fit that pattern? Like the others, it was a spectacular act of violence that, in retrospect, is likely be seen as history-changing: “The election is likely to be a landslide. This probably reduces uncertainty,” said Nick Ferres, chief investment officer at Vantage Point Asset Management, citing polls that showed a surge in support for Reagan after the attempt on his life. The weak counter-argument admits that the shooting significantly improved Trump’s odds, but those odds are not 100% since “nothing is set in stone.” The long and short of it is that those who want a second Trump presidency were the obvious beneficiaries of an apparently random event that, were it a PR stunt, would have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars to the Trump campaign. The iconic photo of Trump fending off the Secret Service agents tasked with whisking him away ASAP and shaking his fist defiantly as he yells “fight! fight! fight!” could not have been more perfectly scripted. Reality TV actor Trump has never been more in his element. Nor could the shooting have been more perfectly timed. It occurred at the ideal moment to interrupt the news cycle that was about to force Biden to step down in favor of a stronger Democratic candidate. And it happened in the best possible time-frame for energizing the Republican base—and taking the wind out of the anti-Trump media’s sails—just ahead of the Republican convention, which became a spectacularly unanimous coronation-by-acclamation. The “shot that winged Trump’s ear” was even luckier for Trump than for the world’s-worst-marksman who allegedly took it. Most obviously, it gave Trump some blood for the photo op. It also gave him the opportunity to put on an ear bandage that served as a sort of purple heart, or rather a white badge of courage, at the convention. If billion-to-one odds had not been defied, and the world’s-worst-marksman had just plain missed—or, vastly more likely, never been allowed to get off a shot—the whole thing would have fizzled and been forgotten, like the failed attempt against RFK Jr. last September. Indeed, of all human beings throughout all of recorded history, Trump may have been “the luckiest to have gotten shot.” Had he “turned his head at the wrong moment such that the bullet completely missed” he would face much better odds of spending the rest of his life in the big house rather than the White House…or of being actually assassinated, presumably by efficient and deniable means. Indeed, the “shot in the ear” was like another kind of shot we have been hearing a lot about—an inoculation shot. It inoculated Trump against further assassination attempts, including the professional kind that rarely miss. Prior to his miraculously lucky ear shot, Trump was vulnerable to being taken out by any of a long list of deniable methods available to his deep state enemies. They could have laced one of his diet cokes with an untraceable heart attack agent, poisoned his toothbrush as happened to J. Edgar Hoover, or had him shot in such a way as to keep him out of the White House rather than to put him in it. But in the wake of the “lucky ear shot” and apparent Secret Service breakdown that enabled it, if anything happens to Trump, his base will burn down the country. That ear shot quite likely saved Trump’s life, not to mention his political career. That the first serious amateur attempt on Trump’s life actually got off shots, and—mirabile dictu—winged his ear, providing hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars worth of PR for the Trump campaign, proves that Yahweh, or his agents, must have had a hand in it. On the assumption that Yahweh delegated the job to his agents, rather than just rolling up his sleeves and doing it himself, the question arises: “How did Yahweh’s agents manage to pull it off?” Some of my excitable friends will no doubt exclaim: “It was all done with crisis actors! Nobody really got hurt or killed!” They will troll the web for photographs that faintly resemble the gunman and his victim, point out that they are still alive, and claim they have proved that the whole thing was a hoax. Alternately, they will dig into birth, death, and social security records, as well as social and mainstream media, and claim that whatever they find isn’t enough to support the presumption that Thomas Matthew Crooks, Corey Comperatore (who died from a gunshot at the rally) and “a 57-year-old New Kensington, Pennsylvania, resident and a 74-year-old resident of Moon Township” ever existed. These are the people who insist that no planes hit the World Trade Center and that most or all of the 9/11 victims never existed. They think nobody really got hurt at the Boston bombing or the Las Vegas shooting or Sandy Hook. It’s all crisis actors, they say. False flaggers who stage violent events actually hate real violence, so they fake as much of it as possible…sometimes all of it. I am, to say the least, not convinced by those arguments. My study of spectacular, spectacularly deceptive deep state events suggests that the perpetrators generally manipulate perceptions of actual violent events, rather than simply staging fake ones. (The violent events, of course, are generally orchestrated or steered by the perpetrators.) If I were one of Yahweh’s agents… If I were a high-ranking member of the deep state who wanted a second Trump term, here’s how I would have done it. Get the necessary personnel on board. After looking at the extensive files on all relevant personnel, from Trump himself to Secret Service people to potential patsies, I would know who to approach and how to approach them. Here’s how I might approach Trump: “Don, the deep state faction that despises you currently has about an 80% chance of success, defined as keeping you out of the White House by either killing or disabling you or winning/rigging the election. The odds that you end up dead or in prison by the end of 2024 are over 60%. We need to significantly move the dial on those odds. There’s only one way to do it: You need to be ‘wounded’ in an assassination attempt that generates a spectacular, iconic photo, and riles up your base to the point that the Never Trumpers avoid taking you out for real.” “Gosh, Kevin…didn’t Nixon once say ‘that would be wrong’”? “Don, your enemies are absolutely ruthless. We have to be ruthless too. So here’s the deal: A lone nut who couldn’t hit the side of a barn is going to fire a few shots at a Trump rally, and one of them is going to supposedly ‘clip your ear.’ You’re going to flinch at the first shot, reach for your ear, hit the deck, and let one of our guys mess with that ear so that when you stand up, there’s blood. You’re going to take command as they try to drag you off, shake your fist, and say ‘fight fight fight.’ Can you remember those lines?” “Roger.” “And don’t worry about how you’re going to look when the first shot rings out, because you’ll know real bullets are flying so you won’t have to do much method acting.” (Then the same basic approach is used on anyone else who needs-to-know. Obviously, only people whose files reveal them to be strongly pro-Trump and ethically flexible are approached. If Trump, based on his files, is not ethically flexible enough to go along with a shooting that will likely hurt or kill one or two of his supporters, he’s told nobody will get hurt…and if and when he learns otherwise after the event, it will be too late. And if Trump is so ethically inflexible that he won’t do a fake shooting at all, which seems ridiculously unlikely, we’ll keep him out of the loop and find a way to shoot his ear with a BB or something from close range at the moment the first shot rings out.) Recruit a shooter who is a poor marksman from the MK-Ultra contingent. For extra insurance, give him a rifle with a bad sight. Stage a “Secret Service screw-up” to get him on roof and give him time to squeeze off several fruitless shots. (The odds that one of those random shots would actually kill or disable Trump are very low—vastly lower than the 60% odds Trump ends up dead or in prison by the end of the year if he doesn’t take the risk.) Look for places to hold Trump rallies with suitable buildings nearby.Set up contingency plans for three or four possible locations, like JFK’s killers did by having plans in place for Miami (canceled), Dallas (successful), and Chicago (unnecessary), according to James Douglass. Count on mainstream media’s distaste for “conspiracy theories”—and be ready to enforce it. Normally a plan like this would seem risky or impossible, because much of the media hates Trump and would love to destroy him by exposing his or his supporters’ crimes. But there are crimes, and there are crimes. Two-bit crimes like 30-year-old he-said-she-said alleged sexual assaults, paperwork screw-ups, and so on are fair game for media and prosecutors. But massive, horrifying political crimes are routinely covered up by media due to the taboo against “conspiracy theories.” So the odds that significant, influential mainstream media will expose the false flag are very low, and can be made lower by scouring the personnel files of all relevant figures in advance and being prepared to stop them if necessary, as was done to Paul Wellstone and Hunter Thompson after 9/11, and many dozens of JFK witnesses and journalists in the wake of the 1963 coup. But would the deep state even want a second Trump presidency? In the past, it has always been the war party that orchestrates this kind of deception. The Maine greased the skids for the Spanish-American war. The Lusitania greased the skids for US entry into World War I. Pearl Harbor singlehandedly enabled US entry into World War II, by flipping the massive anti-war majority into an equally massive pro-war one. The Gulf of Tonkin incident hugely escalated US involvement in Vietnam. 9/11 unleashed a series of wars for Israel that cost $7 trillion and killed millions of people. Interestingly, the JFK assassination, which led to both escalation in Vietnam and (more importantly) US support for Israel’s 1967 war of aggression, was not the only time that a US president has been inserted, by murderous deception, to enable war. The 1940 Republican convention was rigged, after the murder of the convention manager, to ensure that pro-war unknown Wendell Wilkie, rather than any of the other more plausible candidates (who were all antiwar) emerged as the candidate. Since any antiwar Republican would have easily beaten Roosevelt, the murderous insertion of Wilkie was a necessary step towards US involvement in World War II. (The story is entertainingly recounted in Gore Vidal’s The Golden Age.) But Trump?! He and his vice presidential candidate, J.D. Vance, are skeptical about Biden’s war on Ukraine. Isn’t Trump the peace candidate? In a word, no. Trump’s first term was a war presidency, even more than Obama’s. The Trump team: *Armed Ukraine to the teeth and flooded it with NATO advisors, setting the stage for the current war. *Assassinated Iran’s General Soleimani, a shoo-in to win that nation’s presidency, thereby almost setting off World War III. *Ratcheted up the covert US war on China, in part by attacking China with the COVID-19 anti-economy bioweapon. *Refused to withdraw from Afghanistan. *Refused to withdraw from Iraq and Syria despite demands from both governments. *Massively increased military spending. *Declared World War III against the world’s nearly two billion Muslims by approving Israel’s theft of territory, moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, and generally obeying Netanyahu’s every order, setting the stage for the current genocidal war. If the deep state wants to cut its losses and shift the war front from Russia to China and/or Iran, Trump is the man to do it. Trump is surrounded by fanatics who, like the soon-to-be-pardoned Steve Bannon, believe it is the US’s destiny to defeat China in a hot war. And he is even more surrounded by even crazier fanatics who want to blow up the world in general, and Iran and its allies in particular, on behalf of the looniest wing of the Zionist genocide project. With a Democrat in the White House, Netanyahu has no hope of “finishing the job” of the genocide of Palestine. The massacre of a few million Palestinians, and expulsion of millions more, could only happen under the “fog of war” of an all-out US-and-Israel vs. Axis of Resistance confrontation. And that’s what Netanyahu has devoted his entire political career to engineering. He won’t get it without another Trump presidency. Regardless of the details, whether it involves turning Taiwan into China’s Ukraine, or joining Israel’s campaign against West Asia, America can’t mobilize for all-out war with a Democrat in the White House. Only a chest-thumping macho leader like Trump can infuse America’s fighting men (not women, sorry) with the necessary testosterone-fueled enthusiasm. Nobody with fighting spirit is going to sign up for Biden’s rainbow-flag-waving bisexual army. But Trump’s base will flock like lemmings to fight and die for the Orangeman waving the red-white-and-blue. So if you want war, big-time, you need Trump in the White House. End of story. Please convince me I’m wrong! I wish I were wrong about all of this. I wish Mike King, whose view of Trump almost rivals Q Anon’s, were right. I wish Trump were a real America First candidate, rather than an actor who plays one on reality TV. I wish he were the savior America needs, rather than a false messiah. I wish the “magic ear shot” were a real miracle from the universal God (as opposed to the bloodthirsty tribal idol Yahweh) whose purpose was to put a peace candidate in the White House. So go ahead, try to convince me. I want to believe you. Explain to me, in detail, why logic and evidence proves that the “magic ear shot” could not possibly have been orchestrated in the way I am suggesting, or another roughly similar way. I want to believe you. But the onus—the burden of proof—is on you. Given the historical context, we must assume that the “magic ear shot” event was an orchestrated deception, like its historical precedents, unless there is slam-dunk proof to the contrary. So please, drop that slam-dunk proof in the comments section! If you convince me, it will really cheer me up ; – ) Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. He is the host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard-driving weekly radio show funded by listener subscriptions at Substack and the weekly news roundup FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN). He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS, and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications. Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host. Archived Articles (2004-2016) www.truthjihad.com ATTENTION READERS We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion. About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. https://www.vtforeignpolicy.com/2024/07/the-false-flag-trump-shooting/
    WWW.VTFOREIGNPOLICY.COM
    The False Flag Trump Shooting
    The “shot that winged Trump’s ear” was even luckier for Trump than for the world’s-worst-marksman who allegedly took it.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 20782 Views
  • Why Did Washington Memory-hole Gaza?
    Suddenly a White House “priority”—getting aid to starving civilians—has vanished from the news cycle.

    Foreign Affairs

    US Military Constructs Temporary Pier To Deliver Humanitarian Aid To Gaza
    Some are calling it Kamala Harris’s “Sister Souljah moment,” referring to when, in June 1992, then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton publicly rebuked racist comments made by a popular female hip-hop artist as a way of distancing himself from extreme elements of the Democratic base.

    For her part, Harris appeared to be drawing her own line Wednesday, shutting down chants from pro-Palestinian protesters at a Detroit rally on Wednesday, with a firm, “I’m speaking now.” The chants— “Kamala, Kamala, you can’t hide, we won’t vote for genocide”—received this stern rebuke from the vice president: “You know what? If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking.”

    Advertisement
    Harris’s team said the Democratic nominee for president had already met with the protesters earlier so any suggestion she was ignoring this important segment of her constituency was wrong. Her defenders on social media applauded her willingness to call out disruptive tactics that feed into the notion that the party is divided. “At a moment when former President Donald J. Trump is attacking her as ‘radical’ her confrontation with protesters on the left offered a visual rebuttal,” wrote the New York Times’s Rebecca Davis O’Brien.

    Heckling protesters and Sista Souljah moments aside, the incident raises another question, just as important—is Kamala hiding from the Israel–Gaza issue? And are the mainstream media and the Biden administration helping her do it?

    Consider that just four months ago, her boss had stood up at the State of the Union and pledged a military “surge” of humanitarian aid into Gaza to save starving Palestinians on the ground. “To the leadership of Israel I say this: Humanitarian assistance cannot be a secondary consideration or a bargaining chip,” Biden said. “Protecting and saving innocent lives has to be a priority.”

    By July—just four months later—the humanitarian pier project was built and then dismantled amid stunning failure. A major reason: The Israelis never provided safe passage for the aid delivery. The entire spectacle has been memory-holed. But the population in Gaza is getting less aid than it was in March, and is now at risk of suffering from diseases not seen since the 1950s—like polio—and somehow the “priority” has just vanished as a topic at White House and State Department briefings.

    Calls for Israel to allow more trucks into Gaza? Silence. Questions about what aid organizations are equipped to deliver global donations waiting at the border? Crickets. Updates on the maritime corridor which in May was hailed as a “multinational and combined effort” between the U.S., Cyprus, Israel, the UN, and international donors, including the UAE, the United Kingdom, and the European Union? None.

    Advertisement
    “For the White House, no news on Gaza is good news, for food aid or otherwise,” charged Steve Semler, journalist and co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute (SPRI). He diligently tracked the rise and fall of the military “pier” that was supposed to bring salvation to the 2 million population, but ended up floating away with millions of U.S. tax dollars instead.

    “The Biden-Harris administration realizes its Israel policy is a massive political liability, but refuses to compromise with its base on that policy. Instead, the administration tries all sorts of things to make the issue go away,” he told TAC. “It stops talking about food aid in press conferences, it omits details about taxpayer-funded military aid to Israel, it pretends Biden has no leverage over Israel to open humanitarian corridors despite those billions in military aid.”

    The focus instead is on the looming conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the potential for the U.S. to get dragged into the fight, which could include a direct confrontation with Iran. The U.S. is moving more military assets into the region, including giving F-22 Raptors to Israel. CENTCOM chief Michael ‘Erik’ Kurilla, has met twice with Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) leaders in the last week.

    Appearing only to buy time for Israel to continue laying waste to Gaza, Secretary of State Antony Blinken shuttles back and forth to say the same things over and over about urging Israel and Hamas to sign a ceasefire agreement. After Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s chief negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, the prospects for a deal have dimmed significantly. The administration puts no obvious pressure on the Israeli government to stop the ongoing bombing of civilian structures, including schools used as shelters (more than 100 were killed in such an attack Saturday), tent cities, water facilities, and private homes, not to mention its complete refusal to ensure aid to the starving and diseased population inside.

    According to a Reuters report a month ago, humanitarian aid is barely getting into northern Gaza. While some commercial food supplies are making it into the southern crossings, deliveries are erratic—trucks have to be manned by armed guards paid for by the companies and that means prices, when they actually get to market, are far too high for regular Palestinians to afford. There are now fewer than 80 trucks of any stripe getting into Gaza a day, far below the 600 trucks needed to feed the population.

    “Food aid is getting in as a trickle, just a trickle, a few dozen trucks a day,” Chris Gunness, Director of the Myanmar Accountability Project, and former spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), told TAC. “That is why people are literally starving to death.”

    Trucks coming from Israel and the West Bank have been attacked by Israeli settlers. If they do make it to the crossings, food piles up and rots while waiting for delivery. Even when trucks make it through the laborious Israeli inspection process, they run into a buzzsaw of security issues inside: Israeli military attacks, armed gangs. Some 70 percent of humanitarian aid trucks, which typically do not have guards (too expensive) are looted. There are few or no police on the streets anymore, the Israeli military have killed or sent them all fleeing, according to this Wall Street Journal report.

    Interestingly, USAID Director Samantha Power, probably the administration’s most prominent humanitarian, plays only a bit part these days. The last time she spoke candidly out about Gaza was to say that Israel was the chief impediment to food deliveries. That was back in May. She has since announced $100 million in U.S. aid, but we know it is not going anywhere. The administration apparently won’t talk about it openly, just to reporters on background.

    And yet the administration is actively continuing to fuel the Israeli military with weapons used in Gaza to make the situation worse, releasing a fresh $3.5 billion tranche on Friday and deciding not to withhold aid from an IDF unit accused of human rights abuses in the West Bank. It turns a blind eye to comments made by Likud party members and ministers who have defended the use of rape against Palestinian prisoners and the starving of the entire population as “morally justified.”

    Speaking on the Judge Andrew Napolitano podcast this week, Ret. Col. Doug Macgregor, a TAC contributing editor, pointed out how high-level Israelis have talked about how “they're dealing with the Amalek—animals—that deserve the worst, and that anything you do to the animals that are In front of you is justified, so the notion of any sort of moral restraint is completely absent.”

    “The only way to deal with that is to confront it directly but we're not going to do that. Our government will not confront it. They may say something in private, but from the standpoint of the current leadership in Israel, they know they exert infinitely more influence and control over the Senate and the House in the United States than President Biden, or, for that matter, President Harris, does,” he added.

    Harris did raise hopes when she said the following after her visit last month with Benjamin Netanyahu: “The images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third or fourth time. We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering and I will not be silent.”

    But is this more rhetoric than substance? Her office’s response to the heckling protester story Wednesday smacked of trying to have it both ways, the default administration tone. It came in a X post by her top advisor, Phil Gordon:

    .@VP has been clear: she will always ensure Israel is able to defend itself against Iran and Iran-backed terrorist groups. She does not support an arms embargo on Israel. She will continue to work to protect civilians in Gaza and to uphold international humanitarian law.

    Harris is obviously engaged in a delicate dance. Her progressive base is in no mood for triangulation on this issue, yet she is running a national campaign in which many Democratic top donors are especially pro-Israel, as is the leadership and party establishment.

    Semler sees a glass half full and doesn’t think, given the political dynamics, the Harris team can ignore the issue for much longer: “In Minnesota, for example, one in five Democrats voted ‘uncommitted’ in the presidential primary. Current Minnesota Governor and [vice-presidential nominee] Tim Walz has no choice but to talk about Gaza, and so the media has no choice but to cover it. So while the food aid issue is for the time being in retreat, I think the broader Gaza issue is here to stay.”

    Perhaps especially if a candidate only gets only one “Sista Souljah moment” per campaign.

    Advertisement

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/why-did-washington-memory-hole-gaza/
    Why Did Washington Memory-hole Gaza? Suddenly a White House “priority”—getting aid to starving civilians—has vanished from the news cycle. Foreign Affairs US Military Constructs Temporary Pier To Deliver Humanitarian Aid To Gaza Some are calling it Kamala Harris’s “Sister Souljah moment,” referring to when, in June 1992, then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton publicly rebuked racist comments made by a popular female hip-hop artist as a way of distancing himself from extreme elements of the Democratic base. For her part, Harris appeared to be drawing her own line Wednesday, shutting down chants from pro-Palestinian protesters at a Detroit rally on Wednesday, with a firm, “I’m speaking now.” The chants— “Kamala, Kamala, you can’t hide, we won’t vote for genocide”—received this stern rebuke from the vice president: “You know what? If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking.” Advertisement Harris’s team said the Democratic nominee for president had already met with the protesters earlier so any suggestion she was ignoring this important segment of her constituency was wrong. Her defenders on social media applauded her willingness to call out disruptive tactics that feed into the notion that the party is divided. “At a moment when former President Donald J. Trump is attacking her as ‘radical’ her confrontation with protesters on the left offered a visual rebuttal,” wrote the New York Times’s Rebecca Davis O’Brien. Heckling protesters and Sista Souljah moments aside, the incident raises another question, just as important—is Kamala hiding from the Israel–Gaza issue? And are the mainstream media and the Biden administration helping her do it? Consider that just four months ago, her boss had stood up at the State of the Union and pledged a military “surge” of humanitarian aid into Gaza to save starving Palestinians on the ground. “To the leadership of Israel I say this: Humanitarian assistance cannot be a secondary consideration or a bargaining chip,” Biden said. “Protecting and saving innocent lives has to be a priority.” By July—just four months later—the humanitarian pier project was built and then dismantled amid stunning failure. A major reason: The Israelis never provided safe passage for the aid delivery. The entire spectacle has been memory-holed. But the population in Gaza is getting less aid than it was in March, and is now at risk of suffering from diseases not seen since the 1950s—like polio—and somehow the “priority” has just vanished as a topic at White House and State Department briefings. Calls for Israel to allow more trucks into Gaza? Silence. Questions about what aid organizations are equipped to deliver global donations waiting at the border? Crickets. Updates on the maritime corridor which in May was hailed as a “multinational and combined effort” between the U.S., Cyprus, Israel, the UN, and international donors, including the UAE, the United Kingdom, and the European Union? None. Advertisement “For the White House, no news on Gaza is good news, for food aid or otherwise,” charged Steve Semler, journalist and co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute (SPRI). He diligently tracked the rise and fall of the military “pier” that was supposed to bring salvation to the 2 million population, but ended up floating away with millions of U.S. tax dollars instead. “The Biden-Harris administration realizes its Israel policy is a massive political liability, but refuses to compromise with its base on that policy. Instead, the administration tries all sorts of things to make the issue go away,” he told TAC. “It stops talking about food aid in press conferences, it omits details about taxpayer-funded military aid to Israel, it pretends Biden has no leverage over Israel to open humanitarian corridors despite those billions in military aid.” The focus instead is on the looming conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and the potential for the U.S. to get dragged into the fight, which could include a direct confrontation with Iran. The U.S. is moving more military assets into the region, including giving F-22 Raptors to Israel. CENTCOM chief Michael ‘Erik’ Kurilla, has met twice with Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) leaders in the last week. Appearing only to buy time for Israel to continue laying waste to Gaza, Secretary of State Antony Blinken shuttles back and forth to say the same things over and over about urging Israel and Hamas to sign a ceasefire agreement. After Israel’s assassination of Hamas’s chief negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, the prospects for a deal have dimmed significantly. The administration puts no obvious pressure on the Israeli government to stop the ongoing bombing of civilian structures, including schools used as shelters (more than 100 were killed in such an attack Saturday), tent cities, water facilities, and private homes, not to mention its complete refusal to ensure aid to the starving and diseased population inside. According to a Reuters report a month ago, humanitarian aid is barely getting into northern Gaza. While some commercial food supplies are making it into the southern crossings, deliveries are erratic—trucks have to be manned by armed guards paid for by the companies and that means prices, when they actually get to market, are far too high for regular Palestinians to afford. There are now fewer than 80 trucks of any stripe getting into Gaza a day, far below the 600 trucks needed to feed the population. “Food aid is getting in as a trickle, just a trickle, a few dozen trucks a day,” Chris Gunness, Director of the Myanmar Accountability Project, and former spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), told TAC. “That is why people are literally starving to death.” Trucks coming from Israel and the West Bank have been attacked by Israeli settlers. If they do make it to the crossings, food piles up and rots while waiting for delivery. Even when trucks make it through the laborious Israeli inspection process, they run into a buzzsaw of security issues inside: Israeli military attacks, armed gangs. Some 70 percent of humanitarian aid trucks, which typically do not have guards (too expensive) are looted. There are few or no police on the streets anymore, the Israeli military have killed or sent them all fleeing, according to this Wall Street Journal report. Interestingly, USAID Director Samantha Power, probably the administration’s most prominent humanitarian, plays only a bit part these days. The last time she spoke candidly out about Gaza was to say that Israel was the chief impediment to food deliveries. That was back in May. She has since announced $100 million in U.S. aid, but we know it is not going anywhere. The administration apparently won’t talk about it openly, just to reporters on background. And yet the administration is actively continuing to fuel the Israeli military with weapons used in Gaza to make the situation worse, releasing a fresh $3.5 billion tranche on Friday and deciding not to withhold aid from an IDF unit accused of human rights abuses in the West Bank. It turns a blind eye to comments made by Likud party members and ministers who have defended the use of rape against Palestinian prisoners and the starving of the entire population as “morally justified.” Speaking on the Judge Andrew Napolitano podcast this week, Ret. Col. Doug Macgregor, a TAC contributing editor, pointed out how high-level Israelis have talked about how “they're dealing with the Amalek—animals—that deserve the worst, and that anything you do to the animals that are In front of you is justified, so the notion of any sort of moral restraint is completely absent.” “The only way to deal with that is to confront it directly but we're not going to do that. Our government will not confront it. They may say something in private, but from the standpoint of the current leadership in Israel, they know they exert infinitely more influence and control over the Senate and the House in the United States than President Biden, or, for that matter, President Harris, does,” he added. Harris did raise hopes when she said the following after her visit last month with Benjamin Netanyahu: “The images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third or fourth time. We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering and I will not be silent.” But is this more rhetoric than substance? Her office’s response to the heckling protester story Wednesday smacked of trying to have it both ways, the default administration tone. It came in a X post by her top advisor, Phil Gordon: .@VP has been clear: she will always ensure Israel is able to defend itself against Iran and Iran-backed terrorist groups. She does not support an arms embargo on Israel. She will continue to work to protect civilians in Gaza and to uphold international humanitarian law. Harris is obviously engaged in a delicate dance. Her progressive base is in no mood for triangulation on this issue, yet she is running a national campaign in which many Democratic top donors are especially pro-Israel, as is the leadership and party establishment. Semler sees a glass half full and doesn’t think, given the political dynamics, the Harris team can ignore the issue for much longer: “In Minnesota, for example, one in five Democrats voted ‘uncommitted’ in the presidential primary. Current Minnesota Governor and [vice-presidential nominee] Tim Walz has no choice but to talk about Gaza, and so the media has no choice but to cover it. So while the food aid issue is for the time being in retreat, I think the broader Gaza issue is here to stay.” Perhaps especially if a candidate only gets only one “Sista Souljah moment” per campaign. Advertisement https://www.theamericanconservative.com/why-did-washington-memory-hole-gaza/
    WWW.THEAMERICANCONSERVATIVE.COM
    Why Did Washington Memory-hole Gaza? - The American Conservative
    Suddenly a White House “priority”—getting aid to starving civilians—has vanished from the news cycle.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 11521 Views
  • Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today
    We immediately got four offers from top journals to submit for publication in their journals. Also, the Medicare data confirms the Czech data that vaccine toxicity varies by brand!

    Steve Kirsch

    The flu and COVID vaccines do NOT protect against hospitalization. A reanalysis of the VA data published in JAMA shows this clearly.
    Executive summary

    Today was a good day.

    Two breakthroughs:

    My paper showing the COVID and flu vaccines do not work was published in PrePrints today. The paper shows that the COVID and flu vaccines don’t reduce hospitalization at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. It uses VA data published in JAMA by a top epidemiologist to expose the truth. No hospitalization benefit implies no death benefit because there is no precedent in medicine for no hospitalization benefit yielding a death benefit. So they lied to us about the benefits. It was ALL downside risk with the shots.

    I was able to confirm that the Medicare data shows that the mortality rate of the shots depends on brand. Statistically significant. Yet, nobody in the world is looking at this. Not at the local level, not the state level, not the national level. They all look the other way. I guess it’s time for another paper?

    The paper showing the COVID and flu vaccines don’t work

    Please read and retweet this so it gets maximum exposure. This only takes seconds of your time.

    You can read the paper here and download the PDF. Right now, only 49 people have downloaded the PDF which is needed to actually read the paper since the site only has the abstract.


    The medicare data confirms post-shot mortality is brand dependent. These vaccines are NOT safe. They increase all-cause mortality. They need to be immediately revoked.

    I was able to get record level data from Medicare showing the vaccine toxicity is not the same for Moderna vs. Pfizer.

    Since I showed above that the COVID vaccines don’t reduce COVID mortality, that means these are kill shots because there should be no difference between brands if they are safe. But there are differences and they are HUGE and consistent over age bands. These are kill shots and the vax makers are protected from liability with an unlimited license to kill.

    However, NOBODY is listening and nobody cares to verify this in the Medicare data or their own data.

    They are just going to let people die so they can save face.

    I was hopeful I could get Rep. Massie’s attention, but they said I’m not a constituent, so they ignored my call.

    I did inform Senator Johnson directly.

    About my eye

    It got worse (the blood has spread to nearly fully cover my vision in my right eye), then a bit better.

    I’d love to compare notes with anyone who experienced a large sub-retinal and sub-RPE bleed as I have not found anything with compelling evidence that can improve my situation (other than time). Let me know in the comments if you know someone I can talk to.

    Summary

    It doesn’t get any more clear than this. The COVID vaccines didn’t provide any protection against hospitalization or death: they were nothing but kill shots.

    We’ll be submitting our pre-print to one of the journals who invited us to submit to their journal so we can get it published officially in the peer-reviewed literature that the shots don’t reduce hospitalization.

    And we now know the Czech Republic data showing mortality varies by brand is confirmed in the US data. But we can’t make any health authority look at their own data! They all ignore looking at the data in any way that would expose the safety of the shots.

    Hopefully, someday we’ll be able to get their attention.

    Share


    https://kirschsubstack.com/p/paper-showing-covid-and-flu-vaccines
    Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today We immediately got four offers from top journals to submit for publication in their journals. Also, the Medicare data confirms the Czech data that vaccine toxicity varies by brand! Steve Kirsch The flu and COVID vaccines do NOT protect against hospitalization. A reanalysis of the VA data published in JAMA shows this clearly. Executive summary Today was a good day. Two breakthroughs: My paper showing the COVID and flu vaccines do not work was published in PrePrints today. The paper shows that the COVID and flu vaccines don’t reduce hospitalization at all. Zero. Zip. Nada. It uses VA data published in JAMA by a top epidemiologist to expose the truth. No hospitalization benefit implies no death benefit because there is no precedent in medicine for no hospitalization benefit yielding a death benefit. So they lied to us about the benefits. It was ALL downside risk with the shots. I was able to confirm that the Medicare data shows that the mortality rate of the shots depends on brand. Statistically significant. Yet, nobody in the world is looking at this. Not at the local level, not the state level, not the national level. They all look the other way. I guess it’s time for another paper? The paper showing the COVID and flu vaccines don’t work Please read and retweet this so it gets maximum exposure. This only takes seconds of your time. You can read the paper here and download the PDF. Right now, only 49 people have downloaded the PDF which is needed to actually read the paper since the site only has the abstract. The medicare data confirms post-shot mortality is brand dependent. These vaccines are NOT safe. They increase all-cause mortality. They need to be immediately revoked. I was able to get record level data from Medicare showing the vaccine toxicity is not the same for Moderna vs. Pfizer. Since I showed above that the COVID vaccines don’t reduce COVID mortality, that means these are kill shots because there should be no difference between brands if they are safe. But there are differences and they are HUGE and consistent over age bands. These are kill shots and the vax makers are protected from liability with an unlimited license to kill. However, NOBODY is listening and nobody cares to verify this in the Medicare data or their own data. They are just going to let people die so they can save face. I was hopeful I could get Rep. Massie’s attention, but they said I’m not a constituent, so they ignored my call. I did inform Senator Johnson directly. About my eye It got worse (the blood has spread to nearly fully cover my vision in my right eye), then a bit better. I’d love to compare notes with anyone who experienced a large sub-retinal and sub-RPE bleed as I have not found anything with compelling evidence that can improve my situation (other than time). Let me know in the comments if you know someone I can talk to. Summary It doesn’t get any more clear than this. The COVID vaccines didn’t provide any protection against hospitalization or death: they were nothing but kill shots. We’ll be submitting our pre-print to one of the journals who invited us to submit to their journal so we can get it published officially in the peer-reviewed literature that the shots don’t reduce hospitalization. And we now know the Czech Republic data showing mortality varies by brand is confirmed in the US data. But we can’t make any health authority look at their own data! They all ignore looking at the data in any way that would expose the safety of the shots. Hopefully, someday we’ll be able to get their attention. Share https://kirschsubstack.com/p/paper-showing-covid-and-flu-vaccines
    KIRSCHSUBSTACK.COM
    Paper showing COVID and flu vaccines do NOT reduce hospitalization was published today
    We immediately got four offers from top journals to submit for publication in their journals. Also, the Medicare data confirms the Czech data that vaccine toxicity varies by brand!
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 3280 Views
  • Netanyahu Takes Israel to the Brink of Destruction: How Will Iran and Hezbollah Reply?

    On August 30, at 8:00 pm. local time, Israel struck a four-story residential building in the southern section of Beirut, Lebanon. The airstrike assassinated Fuad Shukr, killed three civilians, and injured 174 others.

    Shukr was a senior military commander in the Lebanese resistance organization, Hezbollah, and was a founding member of its military wing. Shukr is accredited with obtaining the bulk of the group’s more advanced weapons, which experts have said are on parity with those of Israel.

    Israeli military planners had accused Shukr of a missile strike on July 27 that killed 12 children playing football in Majdal Shams in the occupied Golan Heights. The children were not Israeli citizens, or Jewish, but were Syrian Druze living under occupation on their own land.

    Hezbollah denied responsibility for the strike, and said after investigation the missile was an Israeli air-defense missile which misfired.

    Israeli ministers attempted to visit the funerals of some of the killed children, but were attacked verbally by parents and relatives, who blame the Israeli military for the massacre.

    Netanyahu deflected blame on Hezbollah for the dead children, and used them to justify the assassination of Shukr. If a regional war starts because of a lie, it won’t be the first time. The US used 9/11 to justify the attack, invasion and occupation of Iraq based on what we know was a lie.

    Prime Minister Najib Mikati of Lebanon condemned the “blatant Israeli aggression,” describing the assassination as a “criminal act” in a “series of aggressive operations killing civilians in clear and explicit violation of international law”.

    Iran

    At 2:00 am. Beirut time, just six hours after the Shukr assassination, Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated by an Israeli airstrike in Tehran, along with his bodyguard Wasim Abu Shaaban.

    Hamas and Hezbollah are both part of the ‘axis of resistance’, which is formed by armed groups across the region. They are united in the armed resistance of Israeli occupation of the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank, as well as Israeli occupied areas in Lebanon and Syria. The groups have been in military exchanges with Israel during the current Gaza war beginning on October 7. The groups have vowed to continue their struggle in support of the people of Gaza until Israel will stop the war.

    Israeli media has reported that the missile that struck Haniyeh’s residence was launched from outside Iran, which would be a first for Israel.

    Haniyeh had been living outside of Gaza since 2019, and was in Tehran for the inauguration of President Masoud Pezeshkian which he attended just hours before his death.

    Israel has previously sabotaged Iranian nuclear and military facilities and assassinated nuclear scientists from inside Iran. In April, Israel launched an attack inside Iran on a military facility in Isfahan, and inflicted damage to a Russian-made S-300 missile defense system.

    Iran’s Khamenei, Pezeshkian and IRGC have all promised retaliation for Haniyeh’s assassination, but have not disclosed their plans. Haniyeh was a guest of the government of Iran when he was killed, and in the culture of the region, a guest is considered the responsibility of the host.

    Iraq

    About 8:00 pm. Beirut time, almost exactly timed with the Israeli attack on Beirut, the US carried out an attack inside a base south of Baghdad operated by Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) that killed four members of the group and wounded four others.

    US officials described the attack as “self-defense” demonstrating coordination with the Israeli military’s assassination of Shukr in Beirut.

    US officials, speaking off the record, said the US carried out an airstrike in Musayib, located in Babil province that targeted militants that the US supposed might launch drones on US forces in Iraq, in an unprovoked and pre-emptive deadly attack.

    The Iraqi parliament had demanded the US military leave Iraq, and the Baghdad government held talks with the US on the subject of withdrawal, but as of yet the US has not complied with the Iraqi demands.

    Iraq condemned the strike saying the US has committed a “heinous crime” by targeting security sites south of Baghdad and said the attacks were a serious violation of the US mission and mandate, an Iraqi military spokesman Yahya Rasool said in a statement.

    The PMF is a division of the Iraqi Army, and fought alongside the US-led coalition in the fight to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

    On July 24, President Joe Biden gave an Oval Office speech saying that he concluded in recent weeks that “the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation.”

    Biden had bet his chances on winning re-election on delivering a win in Ukraine, and a ceasefire in Gaza. On July 11, Netanyahu reneged on his promise to accept the Biden proposed ceasefire in Gaza, Biden and his advisors decided to throw in the towel. Biden is now a lame-duck President and the Oval Office is running on autopilot, which suits Netanyahu.

    On July 24, Netanyahu delivered an address to a joint meeting of Congress. He received numerous standing ovations from the members who attended, while dozens of lawmakers boycotted his address and demanded a ceasefire in Gaza.

    Netanyahu gaged his support in the Congress and knew then he could get away with murder, and stay out of jail. The US Congress had effectively given him the ‘green-light’ to do as he pleased.

    John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M.Walt exposed AIPAC as the driving force which keeps the US foreign policy firmly under the thumb of Israel.

    How Will Iran and Hezbollah Reply?

    In a TV address on July 1, Hassan Nasrallah said the decision to reply has been taken, and Iran has made a similar statement.

    Netanyahu may use the reply to attack nuclear facilities inside Iran, which has been an extremist goal for years.

    Yair Lapid, Israeli opposition politician, met with Netanyahu on July 1 and told him to stop listening to Ithamar Ben-Gvir, the extremist ally of Netanyahu, and stop the war in Gaza.

    The root cause of Middle East conflict is the occupation of Palestine.

    On July 19, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) said Israel should stop settlement activity in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem and end its “illegal” occupation of those areas and the Gaza Strip as soon as possible.

    In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the court had made a “decision of lies”.

    Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 39,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

    *

    Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    Spread the Truth, Refer a Friend to Global Research

    This article was originally published on Mideast Discourse.

    Steven Sahiounie is a two-time award-winning journalist. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/netanyahu-takes-israel-brink-destruction/5864439
    Netanyahu Takes Israel to the Brink of Destruction: How Will Iran and Hezbollah Reply? On August 30, at 8:00 pm. local time, Israel struck a four-story residential building in the southern section of Beirut, Lebanon. The airstrike assassinated Fuad Shukr, killed three civilians, and injured 174 others. Shukr was a senior military commander in the Lebanese resistance organization, Hezbollah, and was a founding member of its military wing. Shukr is accredited with obtaining the bulk of the group’s more advanced weapons, which experts have said are on parity with those of Israel. Israeli military planners had accused Shukr of a missile strike on July 27 that killed 12 children playing football in Majdal Shams in the occupied Golan Heights. The children were not Israeli citizens, or Jewish, but were Syrian Druze living under occupation on their own land. Hezbollah denied responsibility for the strike, and said after investigation the missile was an Israeli air-defense missile which misfired. Israeli ministers attempted to visit the funerals of some of the killed children, but were attacked verbally by parents and relatives, who blame the Israeli military for the massacre. Netanyahu deflected blame on Hezbollah for the dead children, and used them to justify the assassination of Shukr. If a regional war starts because of a lie, it won’t be the first time. The US used 9/11 to justify the attack, invasion and occupation of Iraq based on what we know was a lie. Prime Minister Najib Mikati of Lebanon condemned the “blatant Israeli aggression,” describing the assassination as a “criminal act” in a “series of aggressive operations killing civilians in clear and explicit violation of international law”. Iran At 2:00 am. Beirut time, just six hours after the Shukr assassination, Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated by an Israeli airstrike in Tehran, along with his bodyguard Wasim Abu Shaaban. Hamas and Hezbollah are both part of the ‘axis of resistance’, which is formed by armed groups across the region. They are united in the armed resistance of Israeli occupation of the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank, as well as Israeli occupied areas in Lebanon and Syria. The groups have been in military exchanges with Israel during the current Gaza war beginning on October 7. The groups have vowed to continue their struggle in support of the people of Gaza until Israel will stop the war. Israeli media has reported that the missile that struck Haniyeh’s residence was launched from outside Iran, which would be a first for Israel. Haniyeh had been living outside of Gaza since 2019, and was in Tehran for the inauguration of President Masoud Pezeshkian which he attended just hours before his death. Israel has previously sabotaged Iranian nuclear and military facilities and assassinated nuclear scientists from inside Iran. In April, Israel launched an attack inside Iran on a military facility in Isfahan, and inflicted damage to a Russian-made S-300 missile defense system. Iran’s Khamenei, Pezeshkian and IRGC have all promised retaliation for Haniyeh’s assassination, but have not disclosed their plans. Haniyeh was a guest of the government of Iran when he was killed, and in the culture of the region, a guest is considered the responsibility of the host. Iraq About 8:00 pm. Beirut time, almost exactly timed with the Israeli attack on Beirut, the US carried out an attack inside a base south of Baghdad operated by Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) that killed four members of the group and wounded four others. US officials described the attack as “self-defense” demonstrating coordination with the Israeli military’s assassination of Shukr in Beirut. US officials, speaking off the record, said the US carried out an airstrike in Musayib, located in Babil province that targeted militants that the US supposed might launch drones on US forces in Iraq, in an unprovoked and pre-emptive deadly attack. The Iraqi parliament had demanded the US military leave Iraq, and the Baghdad government held talks with the US on the subject of withdrawal, but as of yet the US has not complied with the Iraqi demands. Iraq condemned the strike saying the US has committed a “heinous crime” by targeting security sites south of Baghdad and said the attacks were a serious violation of the US mission and mandate, an Iraqi military spokesman Yahya Rasool said in a statement. The PMF is a division of the Iraqi Army, and fought alongside the US-led coalition in the fight to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. On July 24, President Joe Biden gave an Oval Office speech saying that he concluded in recent weeks that “the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation.” Biden had bet his chances on winning re-election on delivering a win in Ukraine, and a ceasefire in Gaza. On July 11, Netanyahu reneged on his promise to accept the Biden proposed ceasefire in Gaza, Biden and his advisors decided to throw in the towel. Biden is now a lame-duck President and the Oval Office is running on autopilot, which suits Netanyahu. On July 24, Netanyahu delivered an address to a joint meeting of Congress. He received numerous standing ovations from the members who attended, while dozens of lawmakers boycotted his address and demanded a ceasefire in Gaza. Netanyahu gaged his support in the Congress and knew then he could get away with murder, and stay out of jail. The US Congress had effectively given him the ‘green-light’ to do as he pleased. John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M.Walt exposed AIPAC as the driving force which keeps the US foreign policy firmly under the thumb of Israel. How Will Iran and Hezbollah Reply? In a TV address on July 1, Hassan Nasrallah said the decision to reply has been taken, and Iran has made a similar statement. Netanyahu may use the reply to attack nuclear facilities inside Iran, which has been an extremist goal for years. Yair Lapid, Israeli opposition politician, met with Netanyahu on July 1 and told him to stop listening to Ithamar Ben-Gvir, the extremist ally of Netanyahu, and stop the war in Gaza. The root cause of Middle East conflict is the occupation of Palestine. On July 19, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) said Israel should stop settlement activity in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem and end its “illegal” occupation of those areas and the Gaza Strip as soon as possible. In response, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the court had made a “decision of lies”. Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 39,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children. * Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles. Spread the Truth, Refer a Friend to Global Research This article was originally published on Mideast Discourse. Steven Sahiounie is a two-time award-winning journalist. He is a regular contributor to Global Research. https://www.globalresearch.ca/netanyahu-takes-israel-brink-destruction/5864439
    WWW.GLOBALRESEARCH.CA
    Netanyahu Takes Israel to the Brink of Destruction: How Will Iran and Hezbollah Reply?
    Netanyahu gaged his support in the Congress and knew then he could get away with murder, and stay out of jail.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 7884 Views
  • Mainstream media coverage of Israel’s assassination campaign misleads the U.S. public
    Israel’s provocative assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukr have raised the risk of a wider war in the Mideast, but the U.S. media would rather celebrate Israeli espionage than hold it to account.

    James NorthAugust 3, 2024
    Ronen Bergman being interviewed by CNN's Christiane Amanpour on January 26, 2023. (Screenshot)
    Ronen Bergman being interviewed by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on January 26, 2023. (Screenshot)
    Israel’s provocative assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah senior commander Fouad Shukr has raised the risk of a wider war in the Mideast that could draw in the U.S., but the U.S. mainstream media is characteristically botching its reporting — with one surprising exception.

    The New York Times and others are nowhere explaining the context, history, and possible motivations behind these assassinations. Among them that Benjamin Netanyahu may have ordered the attacks for his own selfish political reasons and to put off his trial for corruption — even though other media don’t hesitate to make that connection, including a leading newspaper in Israel itself.

    What’s more, most U.S. coverage frames Israel’s killings as heroic actions of self-defense, instead of the truth — that the assassinations are violations of international law and an enormous threat to global security.

    [The New York Times’s Ronen] Bergman, whose ties to Israeli intelligence are an open secret, could scarcely hide his glee at the successful assassination.
    Let’s start with the New York Times. One of its longer reports waits until paragraph 9 to explain “that the killings. . . have threatened to engulf the Middle East in a wider war,” but there’s no effort at all to reveal Netanyahu’s (possible) personal motivation. Even worse was Ronen Bergman’s assertion in another article (he collaborated with two other Times reporters, but the story was clearly his) that Haniyeh was actually killed by a bomb planted months earlier, not an air or drone strike into Tehran. Bergman, whose ties to Israeli intelligence are an open secret, could scarcely hide his glee at the successful assassination. His tone throughout was respectful of Israel’s derring do; the report read like a movie script. Bergman nowhere reminded readers that governments that kill people in other countries are violating international law.

    What’s more, Ismail Haniyeh was Hamas’s lead negotiator in the ongoing talks about a hostage release and ceasefire. Many are pointing out that if you are seriously trying to reach an agreement you shouldn’t murder the other side’s top negotiator.

    Journalists know that they can slant their coverage by deciding which experts to quote. In another Times report, Peter Baker found four people, all of them centrists or rightists. The least unreasonable, former U.S. negotiator Aaron David Miller, was buried in the last two paragraphs. Baker quoted no Palestinians, no Lebanese, and no Iranians.

    Also, the U.S. mainstream did not sufficiently emphasize that Israel’s assassinations, especially the killing of Haniyeh, apparently came as a surprise to the U.S. government — even though our country has soldiers in the region who could (and have in the past) become targets if Iran (or others) retaliate. Couldn’t the New York Times and others find U.S. experts who could denounce this scandalous behavior, especially as America is continuing to pay for Israel’s war on Gaza, even after its mass killings of civilians has severely damaged the Biden-Harris administration’s electoral prospects?

    After several days of this media malpractice, and the media narrative had been set, someone at the Times must have felt a twinge of conscience. Steven Erlanger’s headline yesterday was: “Netanyahu, Defiant, Seems to Have Gone Rogue, Risking a Regional War.” And, down in paragraph 6, Erlanger did admit that Netanyahu’s defiance “is fueling suspicions that he is keeping the country at war to keep himself in power” — although he left out the long-standing suspicion that the Israeli prime minister also wants to lure the U.S. into any fighting. (What’s more, the paper put Erlanger’s article on page 11 in today’s print edition, instead of on the front page where it belonged.)

    The Washington Post was a little better. The paper did at least quote the respected Mouin Rabbani, who pointed out that Israel’s past assassinations of leading Palestinian figures “has tended to have at best limited impact on [Hamas’s] abilities, on its development . . . I would not equate killing leaders with eradicating a movement.”

    Meanwhile, the Israel paper Haaretz did not hesitate to run a story headlined: “Is Israel Deliberately Provoking Escalation That Might Drag the U.S. Into the Conflict?”

    There was one pleasant surprise. Trita Parsi is an Iranian-American and a distinguished and prominent academic. But somehow the mainstream U.S. media can’t seem to find his email address or his telephone number. Right after the Haniyeh killing, Parsi posted a quick, detailed response on X, formerly Twitter, which began: “The assassination kills the ceasefire talks. Netanyahu has sabotaged ceasefire talks because ending the war will likely end his political career.”

    This site has long indicted National Public Radio’s coverage of Palestine as being even worse than the low bar set for the mainstream media. But for once, NPR’s Steve Inskeep did interview Trita Parsi on air. Parsi was able to tell NPR’s big nationwide audience that Netanyahu had “deliberately killed” the talks about a ceasefire and a return of the hostages. “Netanyahu has systematically undermined these negotiations,” Parsi said. “Israeli media has even reported how he has selectively released intelligence to sabotage the talks. But nothing will have sabotaged the talks more than killing the guy on the other side of the negotiating table.”

    https://mondoweiss.net/2024/08/mainstream-media-coverage-of-israels-assassination-campaign-misleads-the-u-s-public/
    Mainstream media coverage of Israel’s assassination campaign misleads the U.S. public Israel’s provocative assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukr have raised the risk of a wider war in the Mideast, but the U.S. media would rather celebrate Israeli espionage than hold it to account. James NorthAugust 3, 2024 Ronen Bergman being interviewed by CNN's Christiane Amanpour on January 26, 2023. (Screenshot) Ronen Bergman being interviewed by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on January 26, 2023. (Screenshot) Israel’s provocative assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah senior commander Fouad Shukr has raised the risk of a wider war in the Mideast that could draw in the U.S., but the U.S. mainstream media is characteristically botching its reporting — with one surprising exception. The New York Times and others are nowhere explaining the context, history, and possible motivations behind these assassinations. Among them that Benjamin Netanyahu may have ordered the attacks for his own selfish political reasons and to put off his trial for corruption — even though other media don’t hesitate to make that connection, including a leading newspaper in Israel itself. What’s more, most U.S. coverage frames Israel’s killings as heroic actions of self-defense, instead of the truth — that the assassinations are violations of international law and an enormous threat to global security. [The New York Times’s Ronen] Bergman, whose ties to Israeli intelligence are an open secret, could scarcely hide his glee at the successful assassination. Let’s start with the New York Times. One of its longer reports waits until paragraph 9 to explain “that the killings. . . have threatened to engulf the Middle East in a wider war,” but there’s no effort at all to reveal Netanyahu’s (possible) personal motivation. Even worse was Ronen Bergman’s assertion in another article (he collaborated with two other Times reporters, but the story was clearly his) that Haniyeh was actually killed by a bomb planted months earlier, not an air or drone strike into Tehran. Bergman, whose ties to Israeli intelligence are an open secret, could scarcely hide his glee at the successful assassination. His tone throughout was respectful of Israel’s derring do; the report read like a movie script. Bergman nowhere reminded readers that governments that kill people in other countries are violating international law. What’s more, Ismail Haniyeh was Hamas’s lead negotiator in the ongoing talks about a hostage release and ceasefire. Many are pointing out that if you are seriously trying to reach an agreement you shouldn’t murder the other side’s top negotiator. Journalists know that they can slant their coverage by deciding which experts to quote. In another Times report, Peter Baker found four people, all of them centrists or rightists. The least unreasonable, former U.S. negotiator Aaron David Miller, was buried in the last two paragraphs. Baker quoted no Palestinians, no Lebanese, and no Iranians. Also, the U.S. mainstream did not sufficiently emphasize that Israel’s assassinations, especially the killing of Haniyeh, apparently came as a surprise to the U.S. government — even though our country has soldiers in the region who could (and have in the past) become targets if Iran (or others) retaliate. Couldn’t the New York Times and others find U.S. experts who could denounce this scandalous behavior, especially as America is continuing to pay for Israel’s war on Gaza, even after its mass killings of civilians has severely damaged the Biden-Harris administration’s electoral prospects? After several days of this media malpractice, and the media narrative had been set, someone at the Times must have felt a twinge of conscience. Steven Erlanger’s headline yesterday was: “Netanyahu, Defiant, Seems to Have Gone Rogue, Risking a Regional War.” And, down in paragraph 6, Erlanger did admit that Netanyahu’s defiance “is fueling suspicions that he is keeping the country at war to keep himself in power” — although he left out the long-standing suspicion that the Israeli prime minister also wants to lure the U.S. into any fighting. (What’s more, the paper put Erlanger’s article on page 11 in today’s print edition, instead of on the front page where it belonged.) The Washington Post was a little better. The paper did at least quote the respected Mouin Rabbani, who pointed out that Israel’s past assassinations of leading Palestinian figures “has tended to have at best limited impact on [Hamas’s] abilities, on its development . . . I would not equate killing leaders with eradicating a movement.” Meanwhile, the Israel paper Haaretz did not hesitate to run a story headlined: “Is Israel Deliberately Provoking Escalation That Might Drag the U.S. Into the Conflict?” There was one pleasant surprise. Trita Parsi is an Iranian-American and a distinguished and prominent academic. But somehow the mainstream U.S. media can’t seem to find his email address or his telephone number. Right after the Haniyeh killing, Parsi posted a quick, detailed response on X, formerly Twitter, which began: “The assassination kills the ceasefire talks. Netanyahu has sabotaged ceasefire talks because ending the war will likely end his political career.” This site has long indicted National Public Radio’s coverage of Palestine as being even worse than the low bar set for the mainstream media. But for once, NPR’s Steve Inskeep did interview Trita Parsi on air. Parsi was able to tell NPR’s big nationwide audience that Netanyahu had “deliberately killed” the talks about a ceasefire and a return of the hostages. “Netanyahu has systematically undermined these negotiations,” Parsi said. “Israeli media has even reported how he has selectively released intelligence to sabotage the talks. But nothing will have sabotaged the talks more than killing the guy on the other side of the negotiating table.” https://mondoweiss.net/2024/08/mainstream-media-coverage-of-israels-assassination-campaign-misleads-the-u-s-public/
    MONDOWEISS.NET
    Mainstream media coverage of Israel’s assassination campaign misleads the U.S. public
    Israel’s provocative assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh and Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukr have raised the risk of a wider war in the Mideast, but the U.S. media would rather celebrate Israeli espionage than hold it to account.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4462 Views
  • Assassination of Haniyeh an intentional, dangerous escalation – Parsi, Macgregor
    [email protected] July 31, 2024
    An Iranian man holds a picture of Palestinian group Hamas' top leader Ismail Haniyeh, during a gathering following Haniyeh's killing, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Tehran, Iran July 31, 2024. (ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock)


    Haniyeh lived in Qatar… Israel’s choice to specifically kill him in Iran had several results: ended efforts to improve U.S.- Iran relations, closed the window for addressing Iran’s nuclear program, impeded chances of a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza, and escalated danger of a wider regional war – that would involve Americans in another disastrous conflict…

    by Alison Weir

    Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas’ political wing, was assassinated on Wednesday in Tehran, where Haniyeh was present for the inauguration of the new Iranian president, Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian.

    Pezeshkian is known as a moderate who has sought dialogue with the U.S., repeatedly stating that he would pursue negotiations with the United States – a position that seemed to be supported by Iran’s Supreme Leader.

    The New Statesman reports: “Haniyeh has been pushing for months to reach a ceasefire agreement – often clashing with Yahya Sinwar, the head of Hamas’s military wing, who opposes a ceasefire deal – and US officials had indicated in recent days that a deal was near.”

    While Israel virtually never admits its assassinations, no one doubts that it perpetrated the murder – especially since Israel had earlier pledged that it would kill Haniyeh.

    In addition, this is just the latest action in Israel’s decades-long campaign against Iran.

    The assassination came hours after another Israeli assassination in Beirut, Lebanon had killed Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr, at least five other people, including three women and a young brother and sister (their brother is in critical condition), and wounded 74.

    In an interview on NPR, Iran expert Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, discussed the dangerous and likely intentional ramifications of Israel’s provocative action:

    Steve Inskeep: Ismail Haniyeh was killed while attending the inauguration of an Iranian president who wanted to reengage with the United States. What does that mean for this part of the story?

    Parsi: Well, it likely means that whatever window of opportunity, the election of Pezeshkian provided for both the United States and Iran to reengage diplomatically.

    And as you may know, the Iranian nuclear program has progressed in a way that is very dangerous and necessitates some sort of a diplomatic round of talks to be able to push it back again. But that window has probably to a large extent, at least in the short and the medium term been closed.

    And it is noteworthy, of course, that the Israelis knew exactly where Haniyeh was when– mindful of the fact that he lives in Qatar and could have probably done it in Qatar at any moment. They chose specifically to do it while he was in Tehran in order to send a couple of signals.

    One is potentially the desire to shut down the window of any diplomatic engagement between the U.S. and Iran, but also send a signal that the different groups that Iran is supporting, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi militias and Hamas, that they are not safe anywhere, including in Tehran, and that Tehran cannot protect them.

    Inskeep: I should note one thing you say the Israelis did this. I know you’re presuming that we do not have confirmation from Israel that it was involved. And our editor, James Hider doubts that Israel would own up publicly to to such an act. But this is the accusation that is that is being made. What is the significance of it for Israel, of what would seem to be a more intense confrontation with Iran? Israel has owned up, of course, to killing Hezbollah leader that is a leader of another Iran linked group.

    Parsi: If it is Israel that was behind this, then within the span of 12 hours, they have targeted both Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran at the same time. It’s very difficult to see that as something that is not designed to escalate the situation further.

    We know that from the exchange of fire between Iran and Israel back in April, the Israelis wanted to go much further, but it was the Biden administration that restrained Israel and made sure that it absorbed the blows that Iran gave it in retaliation.

    The Iranians are likely going to retaliate against this. This is deeply embarrassing for them and it’s going to be very difficult for a lame duck Biden administration to be able to keep a lid on this compared to what they managed to do in April.

    At the same time, I think we have to recognize, though, that if the Biden administration had pushed and forced a cease fire much, much earlier, much of this would have been avoided.

    Inskeep: Let’s talk about the cease fire because our correspondent, Daniel Estrin, tells us that Haniyeh, the man who was killed, was essential figure in negotiating or efforts to negotiate a cease fire in Gaza. Is that effort now dead?

    Parsi: It seems to, at least in the short and medium term, not only dead, but to be deliberately killed.

    Netanyahu has systematically undermined these negotiations. Israeli media has even reported how he has selectively released intelligence in order to sabotage the talks.

    But nothing will that sabotage the talks more than killing the guy on the other side of the negotiating table.

    Other experts have also discussed Israel’s provocative actions against Iran.

    There have long been indications that Israel is working to get the U.S. to attack Iran on its behalf as it succeeded with Iraq.

    On April 3, Colonel Douglas Macgregor and Judge Andrew Napolitano laid out the tactics of the Israeli government to embroil the US into its regional war: Israel’s lethal attack on Iran’s embassy complex in Syria was intended to provoke a retaliation from Iran.

    Colonel Douglas Macgregor is a retired combat veteran who served as a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense under President Trump.




    On July 24th, Col. Macgregor pointed out the devastating consequences a U.S. war with Iran would have for Americans:




    The article has been updated with additional information about the Beirut assassination. Alison Weir is executive director of If Americans Knew, president of the Council for the National Interest, and author of Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel. She first spent time in Gaza and the West Bank in early 2001 as a freelance journalist.
    RELATED:

    On July 31st, Ambassador Chas Freeman (bio below) said of the assassination: “I believe It represents an effort by prime minister Netanyahu which he began nine months ago to entangle the United States in Israel’s wars with the Palestinians and its neighbors.”

    “This is an indication that Israel, basically, is prepared to commit any crime at all. It feels no constraints.”

    Freeman also said: “I think there is severe doubt about whether Hezbollah, in fact, was responsible for the rocket that Is alleged to have fallen In the Golan heights. Hezbollah has never attacked Ssyrians, The people there are Syrians under Israeli occupation.”

    “I suspect, as is all too often the case, that Israel has lied For political convenience.”




    Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. is a career diplomat (retired) who was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs from 1993-94, earning the highest public service awards of the Department of Defense for his roles in designing a NATO-centered post-Cold War European security system and in reestablishing defense and military relations with China. He served as U. S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm). He was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the historic U.S. mediation of Namibian independence from South Africa and Cuban troop withdrawal from Angola.
    Ambassador Freeman worked as Deputy Chief of Mission and Chargé d’Affaires in the American embassies at both Bangkok (1984-1986) and Beijing (1981-1984). He was Director for Chinese Affairs at the U.S. Department of State from 1979-1981. He was the principal American interpreter during the late President Nixon’s path-breaking visit to China in 1972. In addition to his Middle Eastern, African, East Asian and European diplomatic experience, he had a tour of duty in India.

    https://israelpalestinenews.org/assassination-of-haniyeh-an-intentional-dangerous-escalation-parsi-macgregor/


    https://youtu.be/Z8KRmJgt9HY

    https://youtu.be/-WXmNuqec1M


    https://youtu.be/V1exlWPj6fA
    Assassination of Haniyeh an intentional, dangerous escalation – Parsi, Macgregor [email protected] July 31, 2024 An Iranian man holds a picture of Palestinian group Hamas' top leader Ismail Haniyeh, during a gathering following Haniyeh's killing, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, in Tehran, Iran July 31, 2024. (ABEDIN TAHERKENAREH/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock) Haniyeh lived in Qatar… Israel’s choice to specifically kill him in Iran had several results: ended efforts to improve U.S.- Iran relations, closed the window for addressing Iran’s nuclear program, impeded chances of a ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza, and escalated danger of a wider regional war – that would involve Americans in another disastrous conflict… by Alison Weir Ismail Haniyeh, the head of Hamas’ political wing, was assassinated on Wednesday in Tehran, where Haniyeh was present for the inauguration of the new Iranian president, Dr. Masoud Pezeshkian. Pezeshkian is known as a moderate who has sought dialogue with the U.S., repeatedly stating that he would pursue negotiations with the United States – a position that seemed to be supported by Iran’s Supreme Leader. The New Statesman reports: “Haniyeh has been pushing for months to reach a ceasefire agreement – often clashing with Yahya Sinwar, the head of Hamas’s military wing, who opposes a ceasefire deal – and US officials had indicated in recent days that a deal was near.” While Israel virtually never admits its assassinations, no one doubts that it perpetrated the murder – especially since Israel had earlier pledged that it would kill Haniyeh. In addition, this is just the latest action in Israel’s decades-long campaign against Iran. The assassination came hours after another Israeli assassination in Beirut, Lebanon had killed Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr, at least five other people, including three women and a young brother and sister (their brother is in critical condition), and wounded 74. In an interview on NPR, Iran expert Trita Parsi, Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, discussed the dangerous and likely intentional ramifications of Israel’s provocative action: Steve Inskeep: Ismail Haniyeh was killed while attending the inauguration of an Iranian president who wanted to reengage with the United States. What does that mean for this part of the story? Parsi: Well, it likely means that whatever window of opportunity, the election of Pezeshkian provided for both the United States and Iran to reengage diplomatically. And as you may know, the Iranian nuclear program has progressed in a way that is very dangerous and necessitates some sort of a diplomatic round of talks to be able to push it back again. But that window has probably to a large extent, at least in the short and the medium term been closed. And it is noteworthy, of course, that the Israelis knew exactly where Haniyeh was when– mindful of the fact that he lives in Qatar and could have probably done it in Qatar at any moment. They chose specifically to do it while he was in Tehran in order to send a couple of signals. One is potentially the desire to shut down the window of any diplomatic engagement between the U.S. and Iran, but also send a signal that the different groups that Iran is supporting, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi militias and Hamas, that they are not safe anywhere, including in Tehran, and that Tehran cannot protect them. Inskeep: I should note one thing you say the Israelis did this. I know you’re presuming that we do not have confirmation from Israel that it was involved. And our editor, James Hider doubts that Israel would own up publicly to to such an act. But this is the accusation that is that is being made. What is the significance of it for Israel, of what would seem to be a more intense confrontation with Iran? Israel has owned up, of course, to killing Hezbollah leader that is a leader of another Iran linked group. Parsi: If it is Israel that was behind this, then within the span of 12 hours, they have targeted both Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran at the same time. It’s very difficult to see that as something that is not designed to escalate the situation further. We know that from the exchange of fire between Iran and Israel back in April, the Israelis wanted to go much further, but it was the Biden administration that restrained Israel and made sure that it absorbed the blows that Iran gave it in retaliation. The Iranians are likely going to retaliate against this. This is deeply embarrassing for them and it’s going to be very difficult for a lame duck Biden administration to be able to keep a lid on this compared to what they managed to do in April. At the same time, I think we have to recognize, though, that if the Biden administration had pushed and forced a cease fire much, much earlier, much of this would have been avoided. Inskeep: Let’s talk about the cease fire because our correspondent, Daniel Estrin, tells us that Haniyeh, the man who was killed, was essential figure in negotiating or efforts to negotiate a cease fire in Gaza. Is that effort now dead? Parsi: It seems to, at least in the short and medium term, not only dead, but to be deliberately killed. Netanyahu has systematically undermined these negotiations. Israeli media has even reported how he has selectively released intelligence in order to sabotage the talks. But nothing will that sabotage the talks more than killing the guy on the other side of the negotiating table. Other experts have also discussed Israel’s provocative actions against Iran. There have long been indications that Israel is working to get the U.S. to attack Iran on its behalf as it succeeded with Iraq. On April 3, Colonel Douglas Macgregor and Judge Andrew Napolitano laid out the tactics of the Israeli government to embroil the US into its regional war: Israel’s lethal attack on Iran’s embassy complex in Syria was intended to provoke a retaliation from Iran. Colonel Douglas Macgregor is a retired combat veteran who served as a Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense under President Trump. On July 24th, Col. Macgregor pointed out the devastating consequences a U.S. war with Iran would have for Americans: The article has been updated with additional information about the Beirut assassination. Alison Weir is executive director of If Americans Knew, president of the Council for the National Interest, and author of Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel. She first spent time in Gaza and the West Bank in early 2001 as a freelance journalist. RELATED: On July 31st, Ambassador Chas Freeman (bio below) said of the assassination: “I believe It represents an effort by prime minister Netanyahu which he began nine months ago to entangle the United States in Israel’s wars with the Palestinians and its neighbors.” “This is an indication that Israel, basically, is prepared to commit any crime at all. It feels no constraints.” Freeman also said: “I think there is severe doubt about whether Hezbollah, in fact, was responsible for the rocket that Is alleged to have fallen In the Golan heights. Hezbollah has never attacked Ssyrians, The people there are Syrians under Israeli occupation.” “I suspect, as is all too often the case, that Israel has lied For political convenience.” Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. is a career diplomat (retired) who was Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs from 1993-94, earning the highest public service awards of the Department of Defense for his roles in designing a NATO-centered post-Cold War European security system and in reestablishing defense and military relations with China. He served as U. S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia (during operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm). He was Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs during the historic U.S. mediation of Namibian independence from South Africa and Cuban troop withdrawal from Angola. Ambassador Freeman worked as Deputy Chief of Mission and Chargé d’Affaires in the American embassies at both Bangkok (1984-1986) and Beijing (1981-1984). He was Director for Chinese Affairs at the U.S. Department of State from 1979-1981. He was the principal American interpreter during the late President Nixon’s path-breaking visit to China in 1972. In addition to his Middle Eastern, African, East Asian and European diplomatic experience, he had a tour of duty in India. https://israelpalestinenews.org/assassination-of-haniyeh-an-intentional-dangerous-escalation-parsi-macgregor/ https://youtu.be/Z8KRmJgt9HY https://youtu.be/-WXmNuqec1M https://youtu.be/V1exlWPj6fA
    ISRAELPALESTINENEWS.ORG
    Assassination of Haniyeh an intentional, dangerous escalation - Parsi, Macgregor
    Haniyeh lived in Qatar... Israel's choice to specifically kill him in Iran had a number of egregious results.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 6927 Views
  • Looking For 45 Million Missing People
    Only 2/3 of living American adults are COVID-vaxxed, according to a new poll. Can you help me find 45 million missing American adults? I look forward to your thoughts in the comments.

    Dr. Colleen Huber
    A Rasmussen poll this past week of 1,250 U.S. adults, everyone 18 years of age and older, shows that only 67% of living American adults believe that they had any COVID vaccine at all. The paywalled article and data are here: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/covid_19/nearly_1_in_5_say_someone_they_know_died_from_covid_19_vaccine


    The poll has a + 3 percentage points margin of sampling error and a 95% CI. Respondents identified 34% as Democrat, 29% Republican and 37% as other, which skews slightly more Democrat than the population at large as reported by Pew Research Center.

    British Medical Journal data is contradicted by Rasmussen

    Now contrast that 67% of U.S. adults who had at least one COVID vaccine against the following British Medical Journal (BMJ) study of 211,303 U.S. adults (everyone 18 years and older; political affiliation unknown), in which 84.8% of U.S. adults received at least one COVID vaccine, as of February 2022.


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943697

    That means that 84.8% of U.S. adults received at least one COVID vaccine by 2022, as published in the BMJ, which is quite contradictory to the Rasmussen poll. (Johns Hopkins’ Our World in Data shows lower total U.S. vaccinated percentages, about 78%, but that includes all age groups, not just adults.)

    Both sets of data for U.S. adults, from Rasmussen and from the BMJ, were collected by surveying, not by access to databases kept by governments or the insurance industry. So we are looking at the same population, only 2.25 years apart, by the same means, although the earlier survey was about 200 times larger than the later one.

    So then we have a discrepancy of 84.8% - 67% = 17.8% of U.S. adults. So did 85% of U.S. adults (per BMJ) or 67% of U.S. adults (per Rasmussen) receive at least one COVID vaccine?

    It is impossible to un-vaccinate oneself, and vaccination status is only additive over time (cannot be subtracted). Also, there are only two all-encompassing and mutually exclusive categories of U.S. adults with regard to the COVID vaccine, that is either n = 0 or n = 1 or more, and if anything, the percent of adults having received a COVID vaccine could only stay the same or increase during the last two years, but cannot possibly go down for the same cohort. So given all of that, then I have a question, which is -

    Where did all those people go?

    Here is a visual representation of the problem.


    The U.S. census says that 255,241,278 adults lived in the U.S. as of July 15, 2023.


    So let’s look at the discrepancy above as a portion of the population.

    84.8% - 67% = 17.8% of U.S. adults = 0.178 of the whole U.S. adult population.

    0.178 x 255,241,278 total U.S. adults = 45,432,947 missing vaccinated adults in the U.S., according to the above discrepancies.

    There are a few possibilities for 45 million people going missing

    45 million people is greater than the population of California (39 million) and almost as big as Spain (48 million). They cannot just go missing, so there must be some reason for the discrepancy between the two polls.

    It is said that anywhere from 5 to 15 million people have walked across the southern U.S. border in the last few years, and that they are generally not expected to have been vaccinated for COVID. But even if that is true, and even if they were represented in the Rasmussen poll, and replaced dying vaccinated Americans, that number is nowhere near 45 million.

    A possible explanation for the missing 45 million people is that unvaccinated survey respondents likely still felt pressure in early 2022 (both from employers and socially) to present themselves as vaccinated, and may have chosen to lie to surveyors, whereas that pressure has likely lessened for most people by now in May 2024. But that would imply that 45 million people would hide their unvaccinated status from surveyors in 2022, but not in 2024. There are about 18 million college students in the U.S., and many were forced to choose between their college education and submitting to the experimental and highly toxic COVID shots, so many of them did submit, and would then be expected to answer surveyors that they were vaccinated. But for unvaccinated college students and workers, would their answers to a survey be the opposite in 2024 as in 2022? I think that verifying that kind of statistic would be extremely difficult or impossible.

    Another possibility is that people may feel no responsibility to give pollsters truthful answers at all, but if that is the case, then why would such a vast number of responses all move in the same direction?

    Another possible explanation of the missing 45 million people is horrifying, and that is that they all died in just two years, which is much too large a number to be unnoticed. I think we can rule this out right away. The CDC alleges that about 3.2 million Americans die each year, about one percent of the population, which is always expected every year in every population, at least pre-COVID, but more since then. Coffin sales are up since the 2021 vaccine rollout, and the funeral business has been very busy since the COVID vaccines, but not reported to be impossibly inundated. 45 million dead in the U.S. over the last three years is simply very unlikely. Believing the CDC, it would likely have been only 7.2 million dead over these last 2.25 years, which still leaves an enormous discrepancy. Plus we cannot assume that the deceased are 100% vaccinated, which of course is impossible (due to the unvaccinated also being mortal).

    There are certainly enormous excess deaths since the launch of the COVID vaccines, but it requires some wealth to access those figures, because the Society of Actuaries (SOA) just hid that information behind a $10,000 paywall, as Mary Beth Pfeiffer writes.

    This excerpt of SOA data that she published a year ago shows significant increases in excess mortality of working age adults.


    The above table shows an enormous number of deaths, including an increase in Q3 2020, prior to the COVID vaccine launch.

    None of the above explain 45 million missing vaccinated American adults, unless by a summation of each of the above categories, but even then, I think there is something very much amiss. So I am hoping readers will help to find these missing people in the comments, which I will appreciate reading periodically over the coming weeks, as they come in, and hopefully we can get this figured out.

    Share


    Data analyst Steve Kirsch discusses additional findings from that same Rasmussen poll here:

    Latest Rasmussen survey shows that the "cure" was nearly as deadly as the disease

    Executive summary Rasmussen Reports, the only market research company in America willing to ask hard questions of the American people, just asked a cross section of American adults if they knew anyone personally who died from COVID and separately if they knew anyone who died from the vaccine…

    Read more

    2 months ago · 378 likes · 257 comments · Steve Kirsch

    A somewhat larger screenshot of the Rasmussen poll data is here:

    Does the last screenshot answer the question of 45 million missing people?


    https://substack.com/home/post/p-145023665


    https://donshafi911sars-cov-2.blogspot.com/2024/07/looking-for-45-million-missing-people.html
    Looking For 45 Million Missing People Only 2/3 of living American adults are COVID-vaxxed, according to a new poll. Can you help me find 45 million missing American adults? I look forward to your thoughts in the comments. Dr. Colleen Huber A Rasmussen poll this past week of 1,250 U.S. adults, everyone 18 years of age and older, shows that only 67% of living American adults believe that they had any COVID vaccine at all. The paywalled article and data are here: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/covid_19/nearly_1_in_5_say_someone_they_know_died_from_covid_19_vaccine The poll has a + 3 percentage points margin of sampling error and a 95% CI. Respondents identified 34% as Democrat, 29% Republican and 37% as other, which skews slightly more Democrat than the population at large as reported by Pew Research Center. British Medical Journal data is contradicted by Rasmussen Now contrast that 67% of U.S. adults who had at least one COVID vaccine against the following British Medical Journal (BMJ) study of 211,303 U.S. adults (everyone 18 years and older; political affiliation unknown), in which 84.8% of U.S. adults received at least one COVID vaccine, as of February 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9943697 That means that 84.8% of U.S. adults received at least one COVID vaccine by 2022, as published in the BMJ, which is quite contradictory to the Rasmussen poll. (Johns Hopkins’ Our World in Data shows lower total U.S. vaccinated percentages, about 78%, but that includes all age groups, not just adults.) Both sets of data for U.S. adults, from Rasmussen and from the BMJ, were collected by surveying, not by access to databases kept by governments or the insurance industry. So we are looking at the same population, only 2.25 years apart, by the same means, although the earlier survey was about 200 times larger than the later one. So then we have a discrepancy of 84.8% - 67% = 17.8% of U.S. adults. So did 85% of U.S. adults (per BMJ) or 67% of U.S. adults (per Rasmussen) receive at least one COVID vaccine? It is impossible to un-vaccinate oneself, and vaccination status is only additive over time (cannot be subtracted). Also, there are only two all-encompassing and mutually exclusive categories of U.S. adults with regard to the COVID vaccine, that is either n = 0 or n = 1 or more, and if anything, the percent of adults having received a COVID vaccine could only stay the same or increase during the last two years, but cannot possibly go down for the same cohort. So given all of that, then I have a question, which is - Where did all those people go? Here is a visual representation of the problem. The U.S. census says that 255,241,278 adults lived in the U.S. as of July 15, 2023. So let’s look at the discrepancy above as a portion of the population. 84.8% - 67% = 17.8% of U.S. adults = 0.178 of the whole U.S. adult population. 0.178 x 255,241,278 total U.S. adults = 45,432,947 missing vaccinated adults in the U.S., according to the above discrepancies. There are a few possibilities for 45 million people going missing 45 million people is greater than the population of California (39 million) and almost as big as Spain (48 million). They cannot just go missing, so there must be some reason for the discrepancy between the two polls. It is said that anywhere from 5 to 15 million people have walked across the southern U.S. border in the last few years, and that they are generally not expected to have been vaccinated for COVID. But even if that is true, and even if they were represented in the Rasmussen poll, and replaced dying vaccinated Americans, that number is nowhere near 45 million. A possible explanation for the missing 45 million people is that unvaccinated survey respondents likely still felt pressure in early 2022 (both from employers and socially) to present themselves as vaccinated, and may have chosen to lie to surveyors, whereas that pressure has likely lessened for most people by now in May 2024. But that would imply that 45 million people would hide their unvaccinated status from surveyors in 2022, but not in 2024. There are about 18 million college students in the U.S., and many were forced to choose between their college education and submitting to the experimental and highly toxic COVID shots, so many of them did submit, and would then be expected to answer surveyors that they were vaccinated. But for unvaccinated college students and workers, would their answers to a survey be the opposite in 2024 as in 2022? I think that verifying that kind of statistic would be extremely difficult or impossible. Another possibility is that people may feel no responsibility to give pollsters truthful answers at all, but if that is the case, then why would such a vast number of responses all move in the same direction? Another possible explanation of the missing 45 million people is horrifying, and that is that they all died in just two years, which is much too large a number to be unnoticed. I think we can rule this out right away. The CDC alleges that about 3.2 million Americans die each year, about one percent of the population, which is always expected every year in every population, at least pre-COVID, but more since then. Coffin sales are up since the 2021 vaccine rollout, and the funeral business has been very busy since the COVID vaccines, but not reported to be impossibly inundated. 45 million dead in the U.S. over the last three years is simply very unlikely. Believing the CDC, it would likely have been only 7.2 million dead over these last 2.25 years, which still leaves an enormous discrepancy. Plus we cannot assume that the deceased are 100% vaccinated, which of course is impossible (due to the unvaccinated also being mortal). There are certainly enormous excess deaths since the launch of the COVID vaccines, but it requires some wealth to access those figures, because the Society of Actuaries (SOA) just hid that information behind a $10,000 paywall, as Mary Beth Pfeiffer writes. This excerpt of SOA data that she published a year ago shows significant increases in excess mortality of working age adults. The above table shows an enormous number of deaths, including an increase in Q3 2020, prior to the COVID vaccine launch. None of the above explain 45 million missing vaccinated American adults, unless by a summation of each of the above categories, but even then, I think there is something very much amiss. So I am hoping readers will help to find these missing people in the comments, which I will appreciate reading periodically over the coming weeks, as they come in, and hopefully we can get this figured out. Share Data analyst Steve Kirsch discusses additional findings from that same Rasmussen poll here: Latest Rasmussen survey shows that the "cure" was nearly as deadly as the disease Executive summary Rasmussen Reports, the only market research company in America willing to ask hard questions of the American people, just asked a cross section of American adults if they knew anyone personally who died from COVID and separately if they knew anyone who died from the vaccine… Read more 2 months ago · 378 likes · 257 comments · Steve Kirsch A somewhat larger screenshot of the Rasmussen poll data is here: Does the last screenshot answer the question of 45 million missing people? https://substack.com/home/post/p-145023665 https://donshafi911sars-cov-2.blogspot.com/2024/07/looking-for-45-million-missing-people.html
    SUBSTACK.COM
    Looking For 45 Million Missing People
    Only 2/3 of living American adults are COVID-vaxxed, according to a new poll. Can you help me find 45 million missing American adults? I look forward to your thoughts in the comments.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 5620 Views
  • Comirnaty, liability, and how the HHS Conspiracy lies, cheats and steals from the public to hide vaccine injuries and useful treatments
    Dear readers, this is a "mistake" substack. My real site is merylnass.substack.com. Nothing more will be added to this site. Please subscribe at the other site.

    Meryl Nass
    If you receive or use a product that is under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), and are injured, you cannot sue the manufacturer, whose liability has been waived by the government. The only possible way to obtain benefits is to apply to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). This waiver, and the CICP program apply to all EUA products: vaccines, drugs, masks, ventilators, COVID tests, monoclonal antibodies.

    When a vaccine is fully licensed, if it has not been placed on the childhood vaccine schedule, you can sue the manufacturer for an injury. A minority of vaccines fall into this category, such as typhoid and cholera vaccines.

    There is a second US government program that waives manufacturer liability for those vaccines that have been placed on the childhood schedule. It is called the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), and it was established in 1986. All vaccines that CDC recommends for children or pregnant women (and the vast majority of vaccines administered in the US) fall into this category. Both the CICP and VICP programs are administered under the Health Resources and Services Agency (HRSA), a subagency of HHS.

    On August 23, 2021, FDA gave Comirnaty a license for people aged 16 and up. And on August 30, 2021, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted unanimously to put Comirnaty on the childhood schedule, and the CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky, concurred. The USG was able to do this because the vaccine had been licensed for 16-17 year olds, who are still children.

    But before Comirnaty can enter the VICP program and gain its liability shield, there must be a 75 cent excise tax imposed on each dose. This money is what supports the VICP awards for injuries. There must also be a notice in the Federal Register. Perhaps surprisingly, neither an excise tax nor a Federal Register notice has been issued for Comirnaty.

    I confirmed this by checking whether Cominarty had been formally added to the childhood schedule, and according to the HRSA, which manages both compensation programs, it has not.

    So, if you actually received the licensed Comirnaty vaccine, correctly labeled as the brand-name product, and not the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine being fobbed off as licensed product, and you were injured, you would be free to sue the manufacturer for your injury.

    But it seems there is no licensed Comirnaty vaccine anywhere to be found in the US. Pfizer wrote, "Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new [Comirnaty National Drug Codes] and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution."

    So, if there is no licensed product being administered, and the EUA vaccine is shielded from liability under the CICP, there is no need to finish moving the product into the VICP, yet. The CICP offers stronger liability protection than does the VICP, and its maximum benefit, about $375,000, is a small fraction of the maximal VICP payout. Furthermore, moving the vaccine into the VICP when there isn't any vaccine to be found might create legal risks for the FDA and HHS.

    FDA issued a license for Comirnaty in order to enable vaccine mandates, which are illegal for EUA products, since EUA products are by legal definition experimental. (I have cited the EUA laws in earlier blog posts.) Yet FDA knew no licensed vaccine would be offered. This was a crime, a "bait and switch" on the American public. I wrote extensively about it the week of August 23, and in an article in The Defender coauthored with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on August 24.

    If you received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization, or received the Moderna (whose branded product, “Spikevax” was licensed on Jan. 31, 2022 but is also unavailable ) or J and J vaccine, you can't sue anyone. You have the right to beg HRSA for compensation for lost wages and unpaid medical bills, period. So far, HRSA and the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program it administers have not paid out one dime for the approximately one million injuries and 20,000 deaths reported to VAERS for any COVID vaccine, nor a cent for any unreported injuries. In fact, they have not paid out a plug nickel for any injuries due to monoclonal antibodies, remdesivir, other COVID drugs, ventilators, tests, masks etc. that are all being used (a.k.a. shielded) for COVID under the EUA program.

    Look at the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program list of all the payments the CICP has made since it was founded. They have paid out a total of 29 claims since 2010. Over 6,000 (almost all related to COVID products) remain to be adjudicated. Note that the word "alleged" is used for both the countermeasure and the injury for which HRSA provided compensation. Even after HRSA provided benefits, HRSA has not admitted that an injury occurred nor that a countermeasure had caused it.

    Table 2. CICP Claims Compensated (Fiscal Years 2010 – 2022) As of November 1, 2021

    “This table displays the alleged countermeasure, alleged injury and amount of compensation paid for each compensated CICP claim filed between Fiscal Years 2010 through 2022.”

    Total amount paid to all CICP claimants since 2010: $6,076,087.47

    DHHS-HRSA have not admitted that a single injury was caused by a COVID vaccine, or for that matter by any COVID product used under an emergency use authorization.

    Similarly, CDC says it has not linked a single death to a COVID vaccine--not even when a recipient walked into the vaccination center but got carried out to the morgue.

    HRSA, FDA, CDC and NIH are all agencies within the federal Department of Health and Human Services. They have all gotten their stories straight. They know nothing and they are just following orders. This article will provide you with examples of how each of these 4 so-called public health agencies helped hide the truth, instead spreading identical false narratives. It made no difference which party was in power. Heil HHS!

    These agencies can't find a doggone problem in the 20 or so databases they are spending many $millions of your money to "study."

    Want to know the biggest conspiracy in the US right now? It is the HHS.

    FDA and CDC each have their own large sets of databases, about a dozen apiece, most of which they pay industry to access. They share management of the VAERS database, by statute. Why don't they share their other databases, since the taxpayer has already paid for them? One reason is that this gives them a reason to spend more loot, and to point fingers at each other when things aren't going well.

    FDA has access to a bunch of electronic databases it has termed the "BEST" Initiative, and it published a plan to use them to study heart attacks, pulmonary embolism, thrombocytopenia, etc. after COVID vaccinations back in July. Where are the results, FDA? What are you waiting for? (According to CDC, "More than 459 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through November 29, 2021."). It seems clear that we aren't going to be informed of FDA's findings until everyone possible has been vaccinated, at which point the results will be irrelevant.

    In October 2020, FDA's head of epidemiology and biostatistics, Steve Anderson, told us there were even more databases that would be studied. Here is what he promised would be studied:


    And here is a more recent FDA list of the databases FDA claims it is using to assess COVID vaccine safety, in addition to VAERS, which FDA and CDC jointly share:


    There was another system FDA promised to use to evaluate vaccine safety: PRISM. But we have heard nothing from PRISM regarding COVID vaccines, or anything else, lately. PRISM has disappeared.


    The Center for Biologics' Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology currently has 11 fulltime staff and 4 vacancies. Did the honest analysts leave? The other eleven seem to be sitting on their hands. Myocarditis is the most obvious COVID vaccine-associated severe adverse event. It usually happens within 4 days of the second shot. It is most common in young males. It has been reported many thousands of times to VAERS. Understanding it ought to be a slam dunk.

    On August 23, 2021, FDA had the temerity to write to BioNTech that its [FDA's] capabilities were inadequate to assess myocarditis, so BioNTech would have to do it for them. Here is what FDA wrote about its inability to use VAERS and its many other databases to assess the myocarditis risk:

    As noted above, the FDA acknowledges that “We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous post-marketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA [in other words, analyzing VAERS--Nass] will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis.

    Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA [in other words, FDA's many other databases that cost the taxpayer $zillions are also inadequate--Nass] is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.”

    NOT SUFFICIENT???? Is this a joke? All this data, plus software, plus a team of analysts, and FDA says it can't assess the risk of myocarditis, despite identifying thousands of cases?

    Unsaid, but implied, is that if FDA is incapable of understanding thousands of reported cases of myocarditis, it cannot or will not study the other serious adverse events that have been reported in conjunction with COVID vaccines.

    VAERS has operated for 30 years, collecting reports of vaccine adverse events. It averaged under 100 cases of myocarditis reported yearly until this year. Through November, CDC reports it received 1949 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis, just in those under 30. CDC didn't say what the total number of reports for all ages was.

    Somehow, FDA and CDC don't seem at all perturbed that the acknowledged reporting rate of myocarditis is over 20 times the average during the past 30 years. Why not?

    CDC has been even more shady in its analyses of safety as FDA, if that is even possible. Below, Nancy Messonier, then head of Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases at CDC, presented this list of databases that CDC would be using in the evaluation of COVID vaccine safety, on December 10, 2020. Apart from the V-safe database (which they stopped talking about last January, after it revealed that 1-3% of vaccine recipients required a doctor visit to deal with side effects), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) (which somehow can't find any problems, not even myocarditis) and the VAERS database, all the other databases CDC promised to study have been MIA.


    NIH, whose job has never been to issue treatment guidelines, but instead to perform and fund research, suddenly took over the treatment guidelines for COVID early in 2020. It formed a committee of internal and eternal "experts" to make up the guidelines. How were they chosen? That is not clear, but what is clear is that 16 of these so-called experts had current or recent financial entanglements with Gilead, the maker of remdesivir. NIH and the US Army also owned pieces of remdesivir. A number of the experts had financial dealings with Merck. While NIH is the single biggest funder of medical research in the world, I cannot recall seeing a single study it funded on the safety of COVID vaccines. Yet somehow vaccines are its number one recommendation.

    It is not clear whether the NIH's guidelines committee is functional. The NIH has been sued to learn whether a vote was even taken by the committee regarding its ivermectin guidelines, which fly in the face of the evidence on ivermectin. And no one has answered the big question: how was NIH somehow authorized to issue treatment guidelines in the first place?

    Here is what has obviously occurred. All these agencies were told they had to keep quiet on vaccine problems (and perhaps problems of other COVID treatments), and they had to fiddle with their data or their analytic methods, or both, to get the required results. And there was to be NO BAD NEWS, no matter what. And no good news regarding generic treatments.

    As we have seen, the so-called scientists and physicians working as bureaucrats in these agencies all caved, sucked it up, did the dirty work, kept their jobs, and betrayed their oaths and the trust of the people of the USA and the world.

    Here is one example of their gross perfidy:
    Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH

    @CDCDirector

    #COVID19 vaccines are safe for children 5-11. They have undergone the most comprehensive & intense safety monitoring system in U.S. history. To date, no serious safety concerns have been identified. Vaccination is the best way to protect children from COVID-19. Dec. 10

    Yet here is what her own agency found 6 months ago:


    And in Hong Kong, health authorities found one case of myocarditis in every 2700 boys aged 12-17 after their second shot. Apparently CDC Director Walensky thinks that is safe. Is she really a doctor?

    It is important to call out the criminals. I hope everyone knows HHS gave the CDC Director's husband's company a $5 million dollar contract in taxpayer money, with options for $12 million more, presumably if she behaves herself... at our expense.


    https://meryl.substack.com/p/how-4-hhs-agencies-conspire-to-lie


    https://donshafi911sars-cov-2.blogspot.com/2024/07/comirnaty-liability-and-how-hhs.html
    Comirnaty, liability, and how the HHS Conspiracy lies, cheats and steals from the public to hide vaccine injuries and useful treatments Dear readers, this is a "mistake" substack. My real site is merylnass.substack.com. Nothing more will be added to this site. Please subscribe at the other site. Meryl Nass If you receive or use a product that is under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), and are injured, you cannot sue the manufacturer, whose liability has been waived by the government. The only possible way to obtain benefits is to apply to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). This waiver, and the CICP program apply to all EUA products: vaccines, drugs, masks, ventilators, COVID tests, monoclonal antibodies. When a vaccine is fully licensed, if it has not been placed on the childhood vaccine schedule, you can sue the manufacturer for an injury. A minority of vaccines fall into this category, such as typhoid and cholera vaccines. There is a second US government program that waives manufacturer liability for those vaccines that have been placed on the childhood schedule. It is called the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP), and it was established in 1986. All vaccines that CDC recommends for children or pregnant women (and the vast majority of vaccines administered in the US) fall into this category. Both the CICP and VICP programs are administered under the Health Resources and Services Agency (HRSA), a subagency of HHS. On August 23, 2021, FDA gave Comirnaty a license for people aged 16 and up. And on August 30, 2021, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted unanimously to put Comirnaty on the childhood schedule, and the CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky, concurred. The USG was able to do this because the vaccine had been licensed for 16-17 year olds, who are still children. But before Comirnaty can enter the VICP program and gain its liability shield, there must be a 75 cent excise tax imposed on each dose. This money is what supports the VICP awards for injuries. There must also be a notice in the Federal Register. Perhaps surprisingly, neither an excise tax nor a Federal Register notice has been issued for Comirnaty. I confirmed this by checking whether Cominarty had been formally added to the childhood schedule, and according to the HRSA, which manages both compensation programs, it has not. So, if you actually received the licensed Comirnaty vaccine, correctly labeled as the brand-name product, and not the EUA Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine being fobbed off as licensed product, and you were injured, you would be free to sue the manufacturer for your injury. But it seems there is no licensed Comirnaty vaccine anywhere to be found in the US. Pfizer wrote, "Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new [Comirnaty National Drug Codes] and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution." So, if there is no licensed product being administered, and the EUA vaccine is shielded from liability under the CICP, there is no need to finish moving the product into the VICP, yet. The CICP offers stronger liability protection than does the VICP, and its maximum benefit, about $375,000, is a small fraction of the maximal VICP payout. Furthermore, moving the vaccine into the VICP when there isn't any vaccine to be found might create legal risks for the FDA and HHS. FDA issued a license for Comirnaty in order to enable vaccine mandates, which are illegal for EUA products, since EUA products are by legal definition experimental. (I have cited the EUA laws in earlier blog posts.) Yet FDA knew no licensed vaccine would be offered. This was a crime, a "bait and switch" on the American public. I wrote extensively about it the week of August 23, and in an article in The Defender coauthored with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on August 24. If you received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization, or received the Moderna (whose branded product, “Spikevax” was licensed on Jan. 31, 2022 but is also unavailable ) or J and J vaccine, you can't sue anyone. You have the right to beg HRSA for compensation for lost wages and unpaid medical bills, period. So far, HRSA and the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program it administers have not paid out one dime for the approximately one million injuries and 20,000 deaths reported to VAERS for any COVID vaccine, nor a cent for any unreported injuries. In fact, they have not paid out a plug nickel for any injuries due to monoclonal antibodies, remdesivir, other COVID drugs, ventilators, tests, masks etc. that are all being used (a.k.a. shielded) for COVID under the EUA program. Look at the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program list of all the payments the CICP has made since it was founded. They have paid out a total of 29 claims since 2010. Over 6,000 (almost all related to COVID products) remain to be adjudicated. Note that the word "alleged" is used for both the countermeasure and the injury for which HRSA provided compensation. Even after HRSA provided benefits, HRSA has not admitted that an injury occurred nor that a countermeasure had caused it. Table 2. CICP Claims Compensated (Fiscal Years 2010 – 2022) As of November 1, 2021 “This table displays the alleged countermeasure, alleged injury and amount of compensation paid for each compensated CICP claim filed between Fiscal Years 2010 through 2022.” Total amount paid to all CICP claimants since 2010: $6,076,087.47 DHHS-HRSA have not admitted that a single injury was caused by a COVID vaccine, or for that matter by any COVID product used under an emergency use authorization. Similarly, CDC says it has not linked a single death to a COVID vaccine--not even when a recipient walked into the vaccination center but got carried out to the morgue. HRSA, FDA, CDC and NIH are all agencies within the federal Department of Health and Human Services. They have all gotten their stories straight. They know nothing and they are just following orders. This article will provide you with examples of how each of these 4 so-called public health agencies helped hide the truth, instead spreading identical false narratives. It made no difference which party was in power. Heil HHS! These agencies can't find a doggone problem in the 20 or so databases they are spending many $millions of your money to "study." Want to know the biggest conspiracy in the US right now? It is the HHS. FDA and CDC each have their own large sets of databases, about a dozen apiece, most of which they pay industry to access. They share management of the VAERS database, by statute. Why don't they share their other databases, since the taxpayer has already paid for them? One reason is that this gives them a reason to spend more loot, and to point fingers at each other when things aren't going well. FDA has access to a bunch of electronic databases it has termed the "BEST" Initiative, and it published a plan to use them to study heart attacks, pulmonary embolism, thrombocytopenia, etc. after COVID vaccinations back in July. Where are the results, FDA? What are you waiting for? (According to CDC, "More than 459 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through November 29, 2021."). It seems clear that we aren't going to be informed of FDA's findings until everyone possible has been vaccinated, at which point the results will be irrelevant. In October 2020, FDA's head of epidemiology and biostatistics, Steve Anderson, told us there were even more databases that would be studied. Here is what he promised would be studied: And here is a more recent FDA list of the databases FDA claims it is using to assess COVID vaccine safety, in addition to VAERS, which FDA and CDC jointly share: There was another system FDA promised to use to evaluate vaccine safety: PRISM. But we have heard nothing from PRISM regarding COVID vaccines, or anything else, lately. PRISM has disappeared. The Center for Biologics' Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology currently has 11 fulltime staff and 4 vacancies. Did the honest analysts leave? The other eleven seem to be sitting on their hands. Myocarditis is the most obvious COVID vaccine-associated severe adverse event. It usually happens within 4 days of the second shot. It is most common in young males. It has been reported many thousands of times to VAERS. Understanding it ought to be a slam dunk. On August 23, 2021, FDA had the temerity to write to BioNTech that its [FDA's] capabilities were inadequate to assess myocarditis, so BioNTech would have to do it for them. Here is what FDA wrote about its inability to use VAERS and its many other databases to assess the myocarditis risk: As noted above, the FDA acknowledges that “We have determined that an analysis of spontaneous post-marketing adverse events reported under section 505(k)(1) of the FDCA [in other words, analyzing VAERS--Nass] will not be sufficient to assess known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and identify an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis. Furthermore, the pharmacovigilance system that FDA is required to maintain under section 505(k)(3) of the FDCA [in other words, FDA's many other databases that cost the taxpayer $zillions are also inadequate--Nass] is not sufficient to assess these serious risks.” NOT SUFFICIENT???? Is this a joke? All this data, plus software, plus a team of analysts, and FDA says it can't assess the risk of myocarditis, despite identifying thousands of cases? Unsaid, but implied, is that if FDA is incapable of understanding thousands of reported cases of myocarditis, it cannot or will not study the other serious adverse events that have been reported in conjunction with COVID vaccines. VAERS has operated for 30 years, collecting reports of vaccine adverse events. It averaged under 100 cases of myocarditis reported yearly until this year. Through November, CDC reports it received 1949 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis, just in those under 30. CDC didn't say what the total number of reports for all ages was. Somehow, FDA and CDC don't seem at all perturbed that the acknowledged reporting rate of myocarditis is over 20 times the average during the past 30 years. Why not? CDC has been even more shady in its analyses of safety as FDA, if that is even possible. Below, Nancy Messonier, then head of Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases at CDC, presented this list of databases that CDC would be using in the evaluation of COVID vaccine safety, on December 10, 2020. Apart from the V-safe database (which they stopped talking about last January, after it revealed that 1-3% of vaccine recipients required a doctor visit to deal with side effects), the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) (which somehow can't find any problems, not even myocarditis) and the VAERS database, all the other databases CDC promised to study have been MIA. NIH, whose job has never been to issue treatment guidelines, but instead to perform and fund research, suddenly took over the treatment guidelines for COVID early in 2020. It formed a committee of internal and eternal "experts" to make up the guidelines. How were they chosen? That is not clear, but what is clear is that 16 of these so-called experts had current or recent financial entanglements with Gilead, the maker of remdesivir. NIH and the US Army also owned pieces of remdesivir. A number of the experts had financial dealings with Merck. While NIH is the single biggest funder of medical research in the world, I cannot recall seeing a single study it funded on the safety of COVID vaccines. Yet somehow vaccines are its number one recommendation. It is not clear whether the NIH's guidelines committee is functional. The NIH has been sued to learn whether a vote was even taken by the committee regarding its ivermectin guidelines, which fly in the face of the evidence on ivermectin. And no one has answered the big question: how was NIH somehow authorized to issue treatment guidelines in the first place? Here is what has obviously occurred. All these agencies were told they had to keep quiet on vaccine problems (and perhaps problems of other COVID treatments), and they had to fiddle with their data or their analytic methods, or both, to get the required results. And there was to be NO BAD NEWS, no matter what. And no good news regarding generic treatments. As we have seen, the so-called scientists and physicians working as bureaucrats in these agencies all caved, sucked it up, did the dirty work, kept their jobs, and betrayed their oaths and the trust of the people of the USA and the world. Here is one example of their gross perfidy: Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH @CDCDirector #COVID19 vaccines are safe for children 5-11. They have undergone the most comprehensive & intense safety monitoring system in U.S. history. To date, no serious safety concerns have been identified. Vaccination is the best way to protect children from COVID-19. Dec. 10 Yet here is what her own agency found 6 months ago: And in Hong Kong, health authorities found one case of myocarditis in every 2700 boys aged 12-17 after their second shot. Apparently CDC Director Walensky thinks that is safe. Is she really a doctor? It is important to call out the criminals. I hope everyone knows HHS gave the CDC Director's husband's company a $5 million dollar contract in taxpayer money, with options for $12 million more, presumably if she behaves herself... at our expense. https://meryl.substack.com/p/how-4-hhs-agencies-conspire-to-lie https://donshafi911sars-cov-2.blogspot.com/2024/07/comirnaty-liability-and-how-hhs.html
    MERYL.SUBSTACK.COM
    Comirnaty, liability, and how the HHS Conspiracy lies, cheats and steals from the public to hide vaccine injuries and useful treatments
    Dear readers, this is a "mistake" substack. My real site is merylnass.substack.com. Nothing more will be added to this site. Please subscribe at the other site.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 11451 Views
  • #REPOST #EVERYWHERE

    Executive Order 13818 — Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption.

    You are witnessing the death of the Pedo Elites and their twisted lifestyles. The false idols of the world are falling. It’s finally happening.

    Celebrity homes for sale:

    Ellen Degeneres, Johnny Depp, Mathew Perry, Eli Manning, Kat Von D, Shia Lebeouf, The Hemsworth brothers, John Legend and Chrissy Teigen, Brittany Snow, Beyoncé, Jay-Z, Cindy Crawford and Rand Gerber, Gene Simmons, Bella Thorne, Tom Cruise, George Strait, Emily Blunt, Alonzo Mourning, Jemima Kirke, Kevin Jonas, Chelsea Handler, John McEnroe, Tommy Lee, Jason Derulo, Alicia Keys, Frankie Muniz, Keith Richards, Lil Wayne, Peter Thiel, Pharrell Williams, Loris Loughlin and Mossimo Giannulli, Rosie O’Donnell, Kellie Clarkson, Cheryl Tieg, Joe Pesci, Suzanne Somers, Adam Lambert, Meghan Markle, Sean Diddy Combs, Billy Joel, Gary Levinsohn, Dr Phil, Barry Manilow, Mel Gibson, Diane Keaton, 50 Cent, Heidi Klum, Ryan Seacrest, Zsa Zsa Gabor, Jennifer Aniston, Katharine Hepburn, Christie Brinkley, Nicholas Cage, Ricky Martin, Angelica Huston, Charlie Sheen, Burt Reynolds, Emilia Clarke, J.Lo & Alex Rodriguez, Simon Cowell, Kris Jenner, Jeffree Star, Gordon Ramsay, Jason Aldean, Pamela Anderson, Jerry Seinfeld, Jimmy Fallon, Dave Ramsey, Jon Bon Jovi, LeBron James, Matt Damon, J.J. Abrams, Sugar Ray Leonard, Ellen Degeneres, Sylvester Stallone, David Bowie, Clay Mathews, Michelle Pfiefer, David E Kelley, Shonda Rhimes, Rihanna, Pete Townshend, Britney Spears, Joe Jonas, Sophie Turner, Robert Redford, Steve McQueen, Shaquille ONeil, Glen Frey, Sammy Hagar, Stockard Channing, Michael Chiklis, Tom Petty, Serena Williams, Bill Russell, Kathryn Bigelow, Don Rickles, Bruce Kovner, Adam Neumann, Leonardo DiCaprio, Barb Ellison, Alicia Keys & Swizz Beatz, Kate Beckinsale, Robert Herjavic, Josh and Heather Altman , Soleil Moon Frye, Jim Harbaugh, Anthony Kiedis, Fredrik Eklund, Meghan Trainor, Gideon Yu, Hellen Miren, Taylor Hackford, Bette Midler, Todd Phillips, Mitt Romney, Dianne Feinstein, Miley Cyrus, Kelly Clarkson, A-Rod, Bobby Patton-LA dodgers co owner, Dwyane Wade & Gabrielle Union, Michael Amini, B-52 Kate Pierson, Bill Guthy, Victoria Jackson, Will Arnett, Zac Efron, Wayne Gretzky, Katy Perry, Derek Jeter, Mike Piazza, Shane Smith, Bryon Cranston, DJ Khaled, Leonard Ross, Ted Sarandos- Netflix co Ceo, Dustin Johnson, John Fogerty, Melissa Rivers, Jamie Lynn Sigler, Lena Dunham, Lyndsey Vonn, PK Subban, Robyne Moore

    Cara and Poppy Delevingne, Big Sean, Steph Curry, Chris Bosh, Phil Collins, Liam Payne, Bryan Singer, Tom Ford, Robby Naish, Tom Brady & Giselle Bundchen, Anthony Davis, Emilia Clarke, Clare Bronfmsn-Seagrams heiress with ties to Nxivm, Jane Fonda, Carmen Electra, Morgan Moses, Bobby Cox, Danny Masterson, Evander Kane, Kate Winslet, Mark Teixeira, Jonah Hill, Judd Hirsch, Carlos Santana, Kennet Chesney, Brooke Shields.

    G. Serpent symbolism is all over the catholic religion. In St. Peter’s Basilica in the vatican the pope literally sits in the mouth of a serpent as the tongue and preaches deception.The Druze bloodline of Jesus are the descendants of “Jethro” ,The Priest of Midian in The Bible & “Torah” (Exodus 2:18).

    The 16th President Of The United States of America “Abraham Lincoln” descend from The Kahlooni family.

    To Governments around the world, WE THE PEOPLE have a message for you;

    For too long you have kept us at bay, indoctrinated and asleep, silenced and used but those times are over!

    You have used our labor to enrich yourselves at our expense.

    You have lied to us constantly through MSM to further ur personal agenda of global dominance.

    You have sacrificed us in wars to for personal gain.

    You have poisoned us to keep us dependent upon Big pharma

    You have thrusted satanic idolatry to affect our future generations

    You have played with innocent lives for too long, that ends now!

    Liberatores servitutis

    Join, it's not too late!
    https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordJ
    🚨#REPOST #EVERYWHERE Executive Order 13818 — Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption. You are witnessing the death of the Pedo Elites and their twisted lifestyles. The false idols of the world are falling. It’s finally happening. Celebrity homes for sale: Ellen Degeneres, Johnny Depp, Mathew Perry, Eli Manning, Kat Von D, Shia Lebeouf, The Hemsworth brothers, John Legend and Chrissy Teigen, Brittany Snow, Beyoncé, Jay-Z, Cindy Crawford and Rand Gerber, Gene Simmons, Bella Thorne, Tom Cruise, George Strait, Emily Blunt, Alonzo Mourning, Jemima Kirke, Kevin Jonas, Chelsea Handler, John McEnroe, Tommy Lee, Jason Derulo, Alicia Keys, Frankie Muniz, Keith Richards, Lil Wayne, Peter Thiel, Pharrell Williams, Loris Loughlin and Mossimo Giannulli, Rosie O’Donnell, Kellie Clarkson, Cheryl Tieg, Joe Pesci, Suzanne Somers, Adam Lambert, Meghan Markle, Sean Diddy Combs, Billy Joel, Gary Levinsohn, Dr Phil, Barry Manilow, Mel Gibson, Diane Keaton, 50 Cent, Heidi Klum, Ryan Seacrest, Zsa Zsa Gabor, Jennifer Aniston, Katharine Hepburn, Christie Brinkley, Nicholas Cage, Ricky Martin, Angelica Huston, Charlie Sheen, Burt Reynolds, Emilia Clarke, J.Lo & Alex Rodriguez, Simon Cowell, Kris Jenner, Jeffree Star, Gordon Ramsay, Jason Aldean, Pamela Anderson, Jerry Seinfeld, Jimmy Fallon, Dave Ramsey, Jon Bon Jovi, LeBron James, Matt Damon, J.J. Abrams, Sugar Ray Leonard, Ellen Degeneres, Sylvester Stallone, David Bowie, Clay Mathews, Michelle Pfiefer, David E Kelley, Shonda Rhimes, Rihanna, Pete Townshend, Britney Spears, Joe Jonas, Sophie Turner, Robert Redford, Steve McQueen, Shaquille ONeil, Glen Frey, Sammy Hagar, Stockard Channing, Michael Chiklis, Tom Petty, Serena Williams, Bill Russell, Kathryn Bigelow, Don Rickles, Bruce Kovner, Adam Neumann, Leonardo DiCaprio, Barb Ellison, Alicia Keys & Swizz Beatz, Kate Beckinsale, Robert Herjavic, Josh and Heather Altman , Soleil Moon Frye, Jim Harbaugh, Anthony Kiedis, Fredrik Eklund, Meghan Trainor, Gideon Yu, Hellen Miren, Taylor Hackford, Bette Midler, Todd Phillips, Mitt Romney, Dianne Feinstein, Miley Cyrus, Kelly Clarkson, A-Rod, Bobby Patton-LA dodgers co owner, Dwyane Wade & Gabrielle Union, Michael Amini, B-52 Kate Pierson, Bill Guthy, Victoria Jackson, Will Arnett, Zac Efron, Wayne Gretzky, Katy Perry, Derek Jeter, Mike Piazza, Shane Smith, Bryon Cranston, DJ Khaled, Leonard Ross, Ted Sarandos- Netflix co Ceo, Dustin Johnson, John Fogerty, Melissa Rivers, Jamie Lynn Sigler, Lena Dunham, Lyndsey Vonn, PK Subban, Robyne Moore Cara and Poppy Delevingne, Big Sean, Steph Curry, Chris Bosh, Phil Collins, Liam Payne, Bryan Singer, Tom Ford, Robby Naish, Tom Brady & Giselle Bundchen, Anthony Davis, Emilia Clarke, Clare Bronfmsn-Seagrams heiress with ties to Nxivm, Jane Fonda, Carmen Electra, Morgan Moses, Bobby Cox, Danny Masterson, Evander Kane, Kate Winslet, Mark Teixeira, Jonah Hill, Judd Hirsch, Carlos Santana, Kennet Chesney, Brooke Shields. G. Serpent symbolism is all over the catholic religion. In St. Peter’s Basilica in the vatican the pope literally sits in the mouth of a serpent as the tongue and preaches deception.The Druze bloodline of Jesus are the descendants of “Jethro” ,The Priest of Midian in The Bible & “Torah” (Exodus 2:18). The 16th President Of The United States of America “Abraham Lincoln” descend from The Kahlooni family. To Governments around the world, WE THE PEOPLE have a message for you; For too long you have kept us at bay, indoctrinated and asleep, silenced and used but those times are over! You have used our labor to enrich yourselves at our expense. You have lied to us constantly through MSM to further ur personal agenda of global dominance. You have sacrificed us in wars to for personal gain. You have poisoned us to keep us dependent upon Big pharma You have thrusted satanic idolatry to affect our future generations You have played with innocent lives for too long, that ends now! Liberatores servitutis Join, it's not too late! 👇 https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordJ ✅️
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 9651 Views
  • Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows
    Frank BergmanJuly 16, 2024 - 12:23 pm

    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer’s equivalent offering.

    According to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna’s shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer’s.

    VAERS is a database that accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination.

    Reports are submitted to VAERS by doctors, healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and other medical professionals.

    A study using data from VAERS was conducted by MIT computer scientist the inventor of the optical computer mouse Steve Kirsch.

    Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), asserts that he is now able to “prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots.”

    According to Kirsch, his study found that “the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer.”

    However, he notes that this was always known “but the medical community chose to ignore it.”

    Explaining his findings in a Substack post, Kirsch notes that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna.

    However, the Pfizer injections only caused 21% more deaths than Moderna.

    “The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer,” Kirsch notes.

    “Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster.”

    “The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE.”

    Kirsch said he wants to provide the computer source code he created for his calculations so that it can be used by other countries to calculate their own deaths per vaccine manufacturer.

    The math code provided by Kirsch is:

    Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information.

    >>> mod_deaths=3714

    >>> pfizer_death=4507

    >>> pfizer_doses=366

    >>> mod_doses=232

    >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses 1.5775862068965518

    >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths 1.2135164243403338

    >>> 1.57/1.21 1.297520661157025

    Kirsch concludes that the mass vaccination campaign has been a “trainwreck.”

    “The end is near,” he warns.

    This news comes as excess deaths continue to soar around the world in the wake of the Covid vaccine rollout.

    As Slay News previously reported, government officials in the Philippines are raising the alarm after the nation has now recorded a staggering 290,000 deaths linked to Covid mRNA shots.

    Unlike other countries around the world, Filipino lawmakers are now sounding the alarm about the crisis and the government has launched a full investigation into the deaths.

    Notably, lawmakers have become alarmed that excess deaths surged among the public after they received Covid mRNA injections.

    Noteworthy hearings have been taking place in the Philippines’ House of Representatives.

    The hearings established that the deaths were not related to COVID-19 and that the spike only emerged after the “vaccines” that were meant to tackle the virus were rolled out for public use.

    During the hearing, lawmakers sought to identify the cause of more than 290,000 excess deaths among the nation’s Covid-vaccinated population.

    Congressman Dan S. Fernandez noted that when the nations began injecting members of the public with mRNA shots in early 2021, the Philippines suffered a 43% spike in its mortality rate.

    “It stands to reason that this very substantial increase in the number of deaths in 2021 could be attributed mainly to either two factors – to COVID-19 infection or to the vaccines themselves,” Fernandez asserted.

    However, during the hearings, lawmakers heard evidence proving that the deaths were not attributed to the virus, meaning they were caused by the injections.

    Strikingly, Fernandez admitted in remarks cited by Aussie 17:

    “We’ve been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandates the pharmaceutical to be responsible.

    “And now we learn from that mistake.”

    READ MORE – Rancher Blows Whistle: Food Supply Spiked with mRNA Vaccines


    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering. According to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna's shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer's.

    https://slaynews.com/news/moderna-covid-shots-more-deaths-pfizer-cdc-data/
    Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows Frank BergmanJuly 16, 2024 - 12:23 pm Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna’s Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer’s equivalent offering. According to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna’s shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer’s. VAERS is a database that accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Reports are submitted to VAERS by doctors, healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and other medical professionals. A study using data from VAERS was conducted by MIT computer scientist the inventor of the optical computer mouse Steve Kirsch. Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF), asserts that he is now able to “prove beyond any reasonable doubt that the Covid vaccines caused unacceptable increases in all-cause mortality for those who opted for the shots.” According to Kirsch, his study found that “the VAERS data clearly shows that the Moderna vaccine causes a disproportionately higher number of deaths than Pfizer.” However, he notes that this was always known “but the medical community chose to ignore it.” Explaining his findings in a Substack post, Kirsch notes that Pfizer has 57% more doses than Moderna. However, the Pfizer injections only caused 21% more deaths than Moderna. “The only way that can happen is if Moderna has a 30% higher death rate than Pfizer,” Kirsch notes. “Even if Pfizer is a completely safe vaccine, Moderna is a disaster.” “The fact nobody is pulling the plug on Moderna is INSANE.” Kirsch said he wants to provide the computer source code he created for his calculations so that it can be used by other countries to calculate their own deaths per vaccine manufacturer. The math code provided by Kirsch is: Python 3.11.2 (main, Mar 13 2023, 12:18:29) [GCC 12.2.0] on linux Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information. >>> mod_deaths=3714 >>> pfizer_death=4507 >>> pfizer_doses=366 >>> mod_doses=232 >>> pfizer_doses/mod_doses 1.5775862068965518 >>> pfizer_death/mod_deaths 1.2135164243403338 >>> 1.57/1.21 1.297520661157025 Kirsch concludes that the mass vaccination campaign has been a “trainwreck.” “The end is near,” he warns. This news comes as excess deaths continue to soar around the world in the wake of the Covid vaccine rollout. As Slay News previously reported, government officials in the Philippines are raising the alarm after the nation has now recorded a staggering 290,000 deaths linked to Covid mRNA shots. Unlike other countries around the world, Filipino lawmakers are now sounding the alarm about the crisis and the government has launched a full investigation into the deaths. Notably, lawmakers have become alarmed that excess deaths surged among the public after they received Covid mRNA injections. Noteworthy hearings have been taking place in the Philippines’ House of Representatives. The hearings established that the deaths were not related to COVID-19 and that the spike only emerged after the “vaccines” that were meant to tackle the virus were rolled out for public use. During the hearing, lawmakers sought to identify the cause of more than 290,000 excess deaths among the nation’s Covid-vaccinated population. Congressman Dan S. Fernandez noted that when the nations began injecting members of the public with mRNA shots in early 2021, the Philippines suffered a 43% spike in its mortality rate. “It stands to reason that this very substantial increase in the number of deaths in 2021 could be attributed mainly to either two factors – to COVID-19 infection or to the vaccines themselves,” Fernandez asserted. However, during the hearings, lawmakers heard evidence proving that the deaths were not attributed to the virus, meaning they were caused by the injections. Strikingly, Fernandez admitted in remarks cited by Aussie 17: “We’ve been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandates the pharmaceutical to be responsible. “And now we learn from that mistake.” READ MORE – Rancher Blows Whistle: Food Supply Spiked with mRNA Vaccines Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering. According to the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), Moderna's shot causes 30 percent more deaths per dose than Pfizer's. https://slaynews.com/news/moderna-covid-shots-more-deaths-pfizer-cdc-data/
    SLAYNEWS.COM
    Moderna Covid Shots Cause 30% More Deaths Than Pfizer, CDC Data Shows - Slay News
    Official data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that Moderna's Covid mRNA injections are even more deadly than Pfizer's equivalent offering.
    Angry
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 4442 Views
More Results