• Vaccines Could Affect Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study
    A recent review found non-live vaccines tend to increase a person’s risks of all-cause mortality, as well.

    Vaccines Could Affect Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study
    (OSORIOartist/Shutterstock)
    Apart from potentially preventing a particular disease, vaccines may cause persistent nonspecific effects that can affect a person’s lifetime survival.

    In a review published on Dec. 26, 2023, in Vaccine, researchers found that non-live vaccines such as influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis B, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) tend to cause adverse nonspecific effects (NSE), increasing a person’s risks of all-cause mortality and infections from other diseases.
    A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the pathogen, which is less virulent but capable of replicating in the body, thus mimicking the actual disease progression. Non-live vaccines use inactivated viruses, fragments, or genes of the pathogen to trigger an immune response without pathogen replication.

    Live vaccines elicit a much stronger immune defense, typically requiring only one shot, while non-live vaccines result in a weaker response, often necessitating multiple shots.

    So far, research has identified several non-live vaccines that cause adverse NSEs, namely DTaP and Tdap, influenza H1N1, malaria, hepatitis B, inactivated polio, and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

    The Vaccine study singled out DTaP, influenza, malaria, hepatitis B, and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.

    On the other hand, live vaccines such as the oral live polio vaccine, the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine for tuberculosis, and the smallpox vaccines all have beneficial NSEs, according to the study.

    “Live vaccines ... elicit epigenetic alterations that train the innate immune system and increase immunity to unrelated infections. In opposition, non‐live vaccines may promote ‘tolerance’ that increases susceptibility to unrelated illnesses,” the authors suggested.

    The study was primarily based on decades of work from Danish researchers Dr. Christine Stabell Benn and Peter Aaby.

    “Our work is a tribute to their great scientific work that has not been recognized,” biologist Alberto Rubio-Casillas, one of the study’s authors, told The Epoch Times.
    Non-Live Vaccines Are Like ‘Ill-Prepared’ Army

    “Historically, we’ve thought about the innate immune system as the first line of defense,” Dr. Benn told The Epoch Times.

    It was thought that innate immunity couldn’t store memory. To use war as an analogy, the innate immune system’s “army” couldn’t learn from previous battles with pathogens. Adaptive immunity, on the other hand, could learn and be trained, forming antibodies to fight against the infection.

    Therefore, for a long time, vaccines were evaluated based on their effects on the adaptive immune system, and antibodies were measured following vaccination.

    However, researchers in the Netherlands have since shown that the innate immune system can be trained. After vaccinating people with the BCG vaccines and harvesting some of the patients’ innate immune cells, researchers found that after vaccination, the innate cells exhibited a more robust immune response and demonstrated improved clearance of tuberculosis, as well as other bacteria and fungi, when compared to patients’ prevaccination status.
    However, the opposite was shown for non-live vaccines.
    Thus, the innate immune system actually does learn something from its previous battles. This is called trained innate immunity.

    Live vaccines, which mimic an actual disease, enhance the effectiveness of the innate immune system in defending against infections. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, weaken the immune system’s ability to fend off infections.

    In a TED talk, Dr. Benn compared infections to a competitive tennis match and live vaccines to a tennis coach. The tennis coach may change tactics and strategies, training the body to have “a wide variety of tricks” against the pathogen. Non-live vaccines, however, are like tennis ball machines that shoot out balls at a specific speed and spot. If a person only trains with a tennis ball machine, he or she will be less prepared for an actual match.

    “So you may be ill-prepared and even worse off when a real opponent enters the court, and the balls start coming and hitting elsewhere than what you trained for,” Dr. Benn said.
    Nonspecific Effects

    Some vaccines result in positive NSEs, but others may result in overall adverse NSEs. The order in which vaccines are administered also factors in.

    While non-live vaccines cause negative NSEs, administering a live vaccine after a non-live one neutralizes negative NSEs, Dr. Benn said.

    This has been shown in studies evaluating the safety of measles vaccines, which are often given at about the same time as DTP, a non-live vaccine. Studies have found that if the measles vaccine is given after the DTP vaccine, there is an overall positive effect, whereas if this order is reversed, then there is a negative effect.

    “It seems that effects are strongest as long as the vaccine is the most recent vaccine,” Dr. Benn said.

    Dr. Benn added that the BCG vaccine has long-term beneficial NSEs “in spite of other vaccines being given afterward.”

    The DTaP vaccine has arguably the most evidence of adverse NSEs. Girls who took the DTaP vaccine had a 50 percent higher risk of dying than boys who took it. Compared to girls who were DTaP-unvaccinated, vaccinated girls’ risk of dying was more than 2.5 times higher.
    Dr. Benn’s studies have generally shown that girls are at a greater risk of developing adverse NSEs after being administered non-live vaccines.
    Live Vaccines Replaced With Non-Live Vaccines

    Non-live vaccines are increasingly replacing live vaccines. For example, live oral polio vaccines are no longer available on the U.S. market, and a non-live version is administered instead.

    This substitution of live vaccines with non-live can pose potential health risks to the general immunity of the population, as the immune systems become less trained and potentially “lazy,” Dr. Benn said.

    However, the main reason non-live vaccines are preferred over live vaccines is that they’re believed to be safer for people with depleted immune systems.

    Since a live vaccine causes mild disease in the body, people with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome can develop a disease from the injection and may die since their bodies are unable to clear infections. Conversely, non-live vaccines comprise only disease components, so they can’t induce disease.

    In this aspect, the “risk of getting the real disease with the live vaccines has been seen as a bigger threat than I think it deserves,” Dr. Benn said.

    Research suggests that people with weaker immune constitutions because of age or chronic disease may sometimes benefit from having their immune systems trained using live vaccines.

    In one study involving hospitalized older patients randomized to get the BCG vaccine or a placebo, the incidence of disease among those who took the BCG vaccine was about half the incidence of disease in the placebo group.
    Health Authorities Still Skeptical

    Despite the evidence suggesting the potential superiority of live vaccines, Dr. Benn’s research has been largely unacknowledged by the mainstays of academia.
    “In my interpretation, whereas most researchers now acknowledge nonspecific effects, the major health organizations are reluctant to accept our findings because [the findings] imply the possibility that some vaccines may sometimes be harmful. So it is easier just to dismiss the whole thing,” she said.

    “The vaccine skeptics, on the other side, may find that our observations on non-live vaccines confirm their worst fears—vaccines can be harmful—but they may be more reluctant to accept the beneficial effects. And their focus on the negative effects may make the vaccine supporters take an even more rigid stance.”

    Immunologists now largely agree that some vaccines cause NSEs, but how these effects should be quantified remains controversial.

    This is because the NSEs of vaccines are dependent on context, whereas a vaccine’s specific effects are generally considered context-independent. For example, females may make more antibodies than males, and younger people more than older, but most people still get some form of immunity.

    “In contrast, because the nonspecific effects act on the broader innate and general immune system, they are dependent on other factors going on in the immune system ... like other health interventions that can alter and modify the nonspecific effects,” Dr. Benn said, noting that not everybody will have the same benefit.

    Additionally, pharmaceutical companies may be more reluctant to produce live vaccines because they’re harder to culture and manufacture.

    “If you have ever tried to bake with sourdough, it’s a little bit like live vaccines; they are very dependent on the temperature of the room, the water used to culture it, and so on,” Dr. Benn said.

    “But basically, all the live vaccines I’m talking about—they have no patents anymore, they’re super cheap to produce, and it’s some of the cheapest vaccines we have to make.”
    Vaccine Safety: NSEs Versus Adverse Events

    Though live vaccines tend to cause positive NSEs, that isn’t to say they can’t potentially cause adverse events. NSEs are considered a separate entity from adverse events, Dr. Benn said. According to her, in rare cases, live vaccines may induce the actual disease in some recipients, such as people born with gross defects in their immune systems or who have severe immunodeficiencies, such as fulminant AIDS.

    In the case of COVID-19 vaccines, live vaccines were likely not considered due to concerns about the formation of recombinant viruses when a vaccinated person comes into contact with the circulating viral strain.
    However, despite their potential beneficial NSEs, the COVID-19 vaccines may still be associated with adverse events because of the presence of highly toxic spike proteins, which studies now link to long COVID and vaccine injuries.
    In the medical textbook “The Immune Response,” the authors wrote that in isolated cases, live viral strains administered to individuals can regain virulence, causing disease in recipients. There’s also a risk of contamination with other viral strains during manufacturing.

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/vaccines-can-impact-long-term-survival-from-other-diseases-study-5559895
    Vaccines Could Affect Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study A recent review found non-live vaccines tend to increase a person’s risks of all-cause mortality, as well. Vaccines Could Affect Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study (OSORIOartist/Shutterstock) Apart from potentially preventing a particular disease, vaccines may cause persistent nonspecific effects that can affect a person’s lifetime survival. In a review published on Dec. 26, 2023, in Vaccine, researchers found that non-live vaccines such as influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis B, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) tend to cause adverse nonspecific effects (NSE), increasing a person’s risks of all-cause mortality and infections from other diseases. A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the pathogen, which is less virulent but capable of replicating in the body, thus mimicking the actual disease progression. Non-live vaccines use inactivated viruses, fragments, or genes of the pathogen to trigger an immune response without pathogen replication. Live vaccines elicit a much stronger immune defense, typically requiring only one shot, while non-live vaccines result in a weaker response, often necessitating multiple shots. So far, research has identified several non-live vaccines that cause adverse NSEs, namely DTaP and Tdap, influenza H1N1, malaria, hepatitis B, inactivated polio, and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The Vaccine study singled out DTaP, influenza, malaria, hepatitis B, and COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. On the other hand, live vaccines such as the oral live polio vaccine, the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine for tuberculosis, and the smallpox vaccines all have beneficial NSEs, according to the study. “Live vaccines ... elicit epigenetic alterations that train the innate immune system and increase immunity to unrelated infections. In opposition, non‐live vaccines may promote ‘tolerance’ that increases susceptibility to unrelated illnesses,” the authors suggested. The study was primarily based on decades of work from Danish researchers Dr. Christine Stabell Benn and Peter Aaby. “Our work is a tribute to their great scientific work that has not been recognized,” biologist Alberto Rubio-Casillas, one of the study’s authors, told The Epoch Times. Non-Live Vaccines Are Like ‘Ill-Prepared’ Army “Historically, we’ve thought about the innate immune system as the first line of defense,” Dr. Benn told The Epoch Times. It was thought that innate immunity couldn’t store memory. To use war as an analogy, the innate immune system’s “army” couldn’t learn from previous battles with pathogens. Adaptive immunity, on the other hand, could learn and be trained, forming antibodies to fight against the infection. Therefore, for a long time, vaccines were evaluated based on their effects on the adaptive immune system, and antibodies were measured following vaccination. However, researchers in the Netherlands have since shown that the innate immune system can be trained. After vaccinating people with the BCG vaccines and harvesting some of the patients’ innate immune cells, researchers found that after vaccination, the innate cells exhibited a more robust immune response and demonstrated improved clearance of tuberculosis, as well as other bacteria and fungi, when compared to patients’ prevaccination status. However, the opposite was shown for non-live vaccines. Thus, the innate immune system actually does learn something from its previous battles. This is called trained innate immunity. Live vaccines, which mimic an actual disease, enhance the effectiveness of the innate immune system in defending against infections. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, weaken the immune system’s ability to fend off infections. In a TED talk, Dr. Benn compared infections to a competitive tennis match and live vaccines to a tennis coach. The tennis coach may change tactics and strategies, training the body to have “a wide variety of tricks” against the pathogen. Non-live vaccines, however, are like tennis ball machines that shoot out balls at a specific speed and spot. If a person only trains with a tennis ball machine, he or she will be less prepared for an actual match. “So you may be ill-prepared and even worse off when a real opponent enters the court, and the balls start coming and hitting elsewhere than what you trained for,” Dr. Benn said. Nonspecific Effects Some vaccines result in positive NSEs, but others may result in overall adverse NSEs. The order in which vaccines are administered also factors in. While non-live vaccines cause negative NSEs, administering a live vaccine after a non-live one neutralizes negative NSEs, Dr. Benn said. This has been shown in studies evaluating the safety of measles vaccines, which are often given at about the same time as DTP, a non-live vaccine. Studies have found that if the measles vaccine is given after the DTP vaccine, there is an overall positive effect, whereas if this order is reversed, then there is a negative effect. “It seems that effects are strongest as long as the vaccine is the most recent vaccine,” Dr. Benn said. Dr. Benn added that the BCG vaccine has long-term beneficial NSEs “in spite of other vaccines being given afterward.” The DTaP vaccine has arguably the most evidence of adverse NSEs. Girls who took the DTaP vaccine had a 50 percent higher risk of dying than boys who took it. Compared to girls who were DTaP-unvaccinated, vaccinated girls’ risk of dying was more than 2.5 times higher. Dr. Benn’s studies have generally shown that girls are at a greater risk of developing adverse NSEs after being administered non-live vaccines. Live Vaccines Replaced With Non-Live Vaccines Non-live vaccines are increasingly replacing live vaccines. For example, live oral polio vaccines are no longer available on the U.S. market, and a non-live version is administered instead. This substitution of live vaccines with non-live can pose potential health risks to the general immunity of the population, as the immune systems become less trained and potentially “lazy,” Dr. Benn said. However, the main reason non-live vaccines are preferred over live vaccines is that they’re believed to be safer for people with depleted immune systems. Since a live vaccine causes mild disease in the body, people with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome can develop a disease from the injection and may die since their bodies are unable to clear infections. Conversely, non-live vaccines comprise only disease components, so they can’t induce disease. In this aspect, the “risk of getting the real disease with the live vaccines has been seen as a bigger threat than I think it deserves,” Dr. Benn said. Research suggests that people with weaker immune constitutions because of age or chronic disease may sometimes benefit from having their immune systems trained using live vaccines. In one study involving hospitalized older patients randomized to get the BCG vaccine or a placebo, the incidence of disease among those who took the BCG vaccine was about half the incidence of disease in the placebo group. Health Authorities Still Skeptical Despite the evidence suggesting the potential superiority of live vaccines, Dr. Benn’s research has been largely unacknowledged by the mainstays of academia. “In my interpretation, whereas most researchers now acknowledge nonspecific effects, the major health organizations are reluctant to accept our findings because [the findings] imply the possibility that some vaccines may sometimes be harmful. So it is easier just to dismiss the whole thing,” she said. “The vaccine skeptics, on the other side, may find that our observations on non-live vaccines confirm their worst fears—vaccines can be harmful—but they may be more reluctant to accept the beneficial effects. And their focus on the negative effects may make the vaccine supporters take an even more rigid stance.” Immunologists now largely agree that some vaccines cause NSEs, but how these effects should be quantified remains controversial. This is because the NSEs of vaccines are dependent on context, whereas a vaccine’s specific effects are generally considered context-independent. For example, females may make more antibodies than males, and younger people more than older, but most people still get some form of immunity. “In contrast, because the nonspecific effects act on the broader innate and general immune system, they are dependent on other factors going on in the immune system ... like other health interventions that can alter and modify the nonspecific effects,” Dr. Benn said, noting that not everybody will have the same benefit. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies may be more reluctant to produce live vaccines because they’re harder to culture and manufacture. “If you have ever tried to bake with sourdough, it’s a little bit like live vaccines; they are very dependent on the temperature of the room, the water used to culture it, and so on,” Dr. Benn said. “But basically, all the live vaccines I’m talking about—they have no patents anymore, they’re super cheap to produce, and it’s some of the cheapest vaccines we have to make.” Vaccine Safety: NSEs Versus Adverse Events Though live vaccines tend to cause positive NSEs, that isn’t to say they can’t potentially cause adverse events. NSEs are considered a separate entity from adverse events, Dr. Benn said. According to her, in rare cases, live vaccines may induce the actual disease in some recipients, such as people born with gross defects in their immune systems or who have severe immunodeficiencies, such as fulminant AIDS. In the case of COVID-19 vaccines, live vaccines were likely not considered due to concerns about the formation of recombinant viruses when a vaccinated person comes into contact with the circulating viral strain. However, despite their potential beneficial NSEs, the COVID-19 vaccines may still be associated with adverse events because of the presence of highly toxic spike proteins, which studies now link to long COVID and vaccine injuries. In the medical textbook “The Immune Response,” the authors wrote that in isolated cases, live viral strains administered to individuals can regain virulence, causing disease in recipients. There’s also a risk of contamination with other viral strains during manufacturing. https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/vaccines-can-impact-long-term-survival-from-other-diseases-study-5559895
    WWW.THEEPOCHTIMES.COM
    Vaccines Could Affect Mortality and Risks of Other Diseases: Study
    A recent review found non-live vaccines tend to increase a person’s risks of all-cause mortality, as well.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 11383 Views
  • The U.S. EPA is attempting to label the popular Berkey Water Filters a pesticide in order to regulate the product under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    The U.S. EPA is attempting to label the popular Berkey Water Filters a pesticide in order to regulate the product under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
    WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COM
    How the EPA Is Attempting to Kill the Berkey Water Filter - Activist Post
    Over the last year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been pursuing a case against the owner of the Berkey Water Systems.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 872 Views
  • Do You Know What’s in a Vaccine? Chemical Ingredients
    Addendum to the Childhood Vaccination Series


    All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

    To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

    Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    ***

    Over the last few decades, the number of chemicals added to foods and other products has skyrocketed. Chemicals are added to “enhance flavor”, make fruits and vegetables look fresh, extend the shelf life of packaged foods and for other invented reasons. A cornucopia of chemicals are also found in lotions and beauty products with the ostensible reason that these chemicals make beauty products feel, look, and smell nice.

    Along with this increase in heavily processed foods has come increased skepticism about the necessity of inserting chemical additives into everything we touch and taste. A significant and growing segment of the US population are beginning to examine the health consequences of ingesting and absorbing these chemical-laden products.

    This growing awareness about the adverse effects of ingesting and absorbing synthetic ingredients and the public’s understanding of the attendant health benefits of consuming products free from synthetic chemicals has prompted consumers to seek out organic ingredient-based items in their foods and skin lotions.

    More people are showing interest in knowing about the ingredients in their food and striving to ‘eat clean.’ This increased awareness is evidenced in the steady growth of the organic food industry and trends in the natural and organic cosmetic industry where demand is higher than ever.

    This same level of concern has begun to seep into the public conscience regarding a certain medical product that has mostly avoided scrutiny – the vaccine.

    Having been trained to accept that this product is a customary aspect of everyday life, most people haven’t given much thought to what’s inside the vaccine vials. Rarely will the vaccine ritual in the doctor’s office include a discussion about the ingredients which are about to be injected into the patient’s body. It’s highly likely the physicians and nurses themselves don’t know the ingredients of each vaccine.

    So what’s in that vial? What’s coming through that needle?

    A Partial List of Ingredients

    Aluminum: Aluminum salts are used in some vaccine formulations as an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a substance added to vaccines to ostensibly enhance the immune response. Examples of aluminum salts in some vaccines are aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate) or mixed aluminum salts.

    In a 2011 study Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic stated the following:

    “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.”

    Multiple studies have shown that the intramuscularly injected aluminum vaccine adjuvant is absorbed into the systemic circulation and travels to different sites in the body, such as the brain, joints, and the spleen, where it accumulates and is retained for years post-vaccination.

    Mercury (thimerosal): Thimerosal is an ethyl mercury-based preservative used in vials that contain more than one dose of a vaccine (multi-dose vials) to prevent germs, bacteria and/or fungi from contaminating the vaccine. While in decline some flu vaccines and childhood vaccines in multi-dose vials still utilize thimerosal.

    Mercury is known to be a genotoxic agent, even in minute concentrations, which can damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer.

    A meta-analysis epidemiological study suggested thimerosal containing vaccines significantly increased the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.

    A 2011 study suggested there may be higher rates of blood and brain mercury levels in monkeys exposed to vaccines containing thimerosal.

    The American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service (1999) published a joint statement that urged “all government agencies to work rapidly toward reducing children’s exposure to mercury from all sources.”

    Gelatin: Gelatin is used as a stabilizer in some vaccines licensed in the U.S. Stabilizers are added to vaccines to protect the active ingredients from degrading during manufacture, transport and storage.

    Gelatin is a protein obtained from cows or pigs and produced by the partial hydrolysis of collagen extracted by boiling animal parts such as cartilage, tendons, skin, bones and ligaments in water. Some people might have a severe allergic reaction to it.

    Certain vaccine viruses are grown on gelatin derived from the ligaments of pigs fed heavy doses of glyphosate in their feed. Gelatin comes from collagen which has lots of glycine.

    Gelatin is one of the most commonly identified causes of allergic reactions to vaccines.

    A 1999 Japanese study showed most anaphylactic reactions and some urticarial reactions to gelatin-containing measles, mumps, and rubella monovalent vaccines were associated with gelatin allergy. Based on these findings Japan removed gelatin from vaccines in 2000.

    Formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is used during the manufacture of some vaccines to inactivate viruses (like polio and hepatitis A viruses) or bacterial toxins (like diphtheria and tetanus toxins).

    Formaldehyde is a human carcinogen based on evidence from cancer studies in humans and is listed as aknown to be human carcinogen in the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) Twelfth Report on Carcinogens(2011).

    Phenol/Phenoxyethanol: Phenoxyethanol is used in vaccines and biologics as a preservative to prevent microbial growth.

    A 2010 study, The relative toxicity of compounds used as preservatives in vaccines and biologics, assessed the relative cytotoxicity of the levels of the compounds commonly used as preservative in US licensed vaccines and found that for phenoxyethanol it was 4.6-fold, for phenol 12.2-fold and for Thimerosal >330-fold.

    They concluded, “None of the compounds commonly used as preservatives in US licensed vaccine/biological preparations can be considered an ideal preservative, and their ability to fully comply with the requirements of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for preservatives is in doubt.”

    Case reports (here, here and here) have suggested a link between phenoxyethanol and urticaria (hives), eczema and anaphylaxis.

    Triton X-100: Triton X –100 or octylphenol ethoxylate (OPE) is a surfactant (reducing the surface tension of liquids) and stabilizer present in some influenza vaccines.

    OPEs are endocrine disruptors and break down relatively easily into Octylphenols (OPs), which are more harmful. Endocrine disruptors can alter reproductive function, increase incidences of breast cancer, affect growth patterns and neurodevelopment in children and change immune function.

    Squalene: Squalene is a naturally-occurring substance derived primarily from shark liver oil. When combined with other ingredients it becomes an adjuvant, which, like aluminum, is added to vaccines to elicit a stronger immune response from the body.

    A 2000 study demonstrated that one intradermal injection of squalene adjuvant produced arthritis in rats.

    Some believe that Gulf War Syndrome was linked to the presence of squalene in certain lots of the anthrax vaccine.

    Beta-propiolactone: Beta-propiolactone (BPL) is a commonly used reagent for the inactivation of viruses for use in vaccine preparations. It has recently been used in the development of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine preparation.

    Beta-propiolactone is a known carcinogen. Local sarcomas have been produced by subcutaneous injection of beta-propiolactone in rats. In the laboratory sarcomas and squamous papillomas in mice were produced by a single subcutaneous injection of a minute amount of beta-propiolactone.

    Polysorbate 80: Polysorbate 80 is present in some vaccines to stop the vaccine from separating into its component parts. In a PubMed study Polysorbate 80 was described as, “a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.”

    In a pharmacological study on mice and rats Polysorbate 80 produced, “mild to moderate depression of the central nervous system with a marked reduction in locomotor activity and rectal temperature, exhibited ataxia and paralytic activity and potentiated the pentobarbital sleeping time.”

    The results of that study concluded, “The results of the present study indicate that polysorbate 80 can neither be used as a solvent for isolated tissue experiments nor when considered for intravenous administration.”

    Another study from the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) suggested the dietary emulsifier polysorbate 80 may induce low-grade inflammation which may contribute to metabolic diseases and increase the potential for development in colon cancer.

    Genetically modified yeast: S. cerevisiae, a species of yeast, is used in vaccines in a variety of ways. It is used as an adjuvant and now through genetic manipulation it is being used to create artificial antibodies

    Studies have suggested that genetically engineered yeast used in vaccines may be a contributing factor to autoimmune disorders.

    Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): Monosodium Glutamate is used in small amounts in some vaccines to keep them stable and protect them from losing potency even when exposed to heat and light.

    In a study that looked at rat fertility and MSG consumption the authors found there was a negative impact on the rats’ fertility.

    In another study it was noted that chronic MSG intake caused kidney dysfunction and renal oxidative stress in the animal model.

    Cells From Aborted Fetus: Fetal cell lines are used to grow viruses which are then collected from the cell cultures and processed further to produce the vaccine itself.

    The cell lines are propagated from lung tissue of mature aborted and used in the current manufacture of a number of routine vaccines, including measles, mumps and rubella (MMRV), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio, (DTaP-IPV), Hepatitis A and chickenpox.

    Aborted fetal cells are listed on vaccine package inserts as “Human Fetal Diploid Cells.” Two aborted fetal cell lines, WI-38 and MRC-5, have been grown under laboratory conditions since the 1960s. Diploid cells (WI-38, MRC-5) vaccines have their origin in induced abortions.

    The use of such cell lines can be profoundly objectionable to segments of the population who hold certain religious and/or philosophical beliefs.

    The Italian vaccine research and advocacy organization Corvelva released a study in 2019 regarding the use of aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines.

    In their summary they highlighted the following:

    The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual.
    560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications.
    There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer.
    What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants.
    Serum From Aborted Calf Fetus Blood: The purpose for the fetal bovine serum is to provide a nutrient broth for viruses to grow in cells.

    Humane Research Australia describes the process of how the blood is collected, “The blood is collected after the slaughter of a mature female cow, the mother’s uterus containing the calf fetus is removed during the evisceration process and transferred to the blood collection room. A needle is then inserted between the fetus’s ribs directly into its heart and the blood is vacuumed into a sterile collection bag.

    Only fetuses over the age of three months are used otherwise the heart is considered too small to puncture. Once collected, the blood is allowed to clot at room temperature and the serum separated through a process known as refrigerated centrifugation.”

    Beyond certain ethical considerations scientists have found that different bovine tissues contain different amounts of the BSE agent.

    Antibiotics: Antibiotics are used during the manufacturing process of some vaccines to stop bacteria growing and contaminating the vaccine.

    Antibiotics found in some vaccines include neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin b, gentamicin and kanamycin.

    Polymyxin B comes with a warning that, “This medicine has not been fully studied in pregnant women. This medicine may cause kidney problems. This medicine may cause nerve problems”, as well as a laundry list of side effects.

    Similar warnings are found with streptomycin, neomycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin.

    A study out of Finland raised concerns about excessive antibiotic use in early childhood which may lead to weight gain and altered gut bacteria.

    What Else Could be in That Needle?

    The list above is not a complete account of all the ingredients found in various vaccine cocktails. A comprehensive manufacturers’ catalog of ingredients can be found here, here and here.

    The reality is that even a complete list issued by the producer doesn’t tell the entire story of what is found in vaccines.

    Using an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe a group of Italian scientists examined 44 samples of 30 different vaccines and found dangerous contaminants, including metal toxicants in 43 of the 44 samples tested.

    In the study, published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers detected lead, chromium, nickel and other metals in every adjuvant sample tested.

    Additional metal contaminants identified in 25 of the human vaccines included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Foreign impurities such as zirconium, hafnium, strontium, tungsten, antimony, bismuth, cerium and were also detected in many of the vaccines tested.

    The researchers commenting on their unexpected findings reported:

    The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring….In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants. [Emphasis added]

    When interviewed lead scientist Dr. Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, explained that the discovery of vaccine impurities shocked the researchers:

    Those particles should not have been there. We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act of faith on which it seemed impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated our analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence.

    Speculating on the potential consequences of these foreign impurities Dr. Gatti stated:

    The particles, be they isolated, aggregated or clustered, are not supposed to be there… Our tissues perceive these foreign bodies as potential enemies…Unfortunately, though, the particles we found in vaccines, are not biodegradable. So, all the macrophages’ efforts will be useless, and depending on the exact chemicals involved, the particles may be especially toxic. Cytokines and pro-inflammatory substances in general are released and granulated tissue forms, enveloping the particles. This provokes inflammation which, in the long run, if locally persistent, is known to be a precursor to cancer.

    Along with unlisted metal contaminants another unlisted contaminant was noted in some vaccines when a preliminary screening result from Microbe Inotech Laboratories Inc. detected glyphosate in the childhood vaccines they tested.

    Merck’s MMR II vaccine had 2.671 parts per billion (ppb) of glyphosate, Sanofi Pasteur’s DTap Adacel vaccine had 0.123 ppb, Novartis’ Influenza Fluvirin had 0.331 ppb, Glaxo Smith Kline’s HepB Energix-B vaccine had 0.325 ppb, Merck’s Pneumococcal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax 23 had 0.107 ppb of glyphosate.

    These findings prompted Moms Across America to send a letter to the FDA, CDC, EPA,NIH and California Department of Health requesting that they test vaccines for glyphosate and recall contaminated vaccines.

    MIT scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff remarked on the route by which glyphosate could get into vaccines:

    Collagen is a protein found in large amounts in the ligaments of cows, and these ligaments are often used in the production of gelatin. The MMR vaccine and flu vaccine viruses are grown as live cultures on gelatin sourced from cows fed high concentrations of glyphosate in their GMO Roundup­Ready feed.

    What to Do?

    Given the complex nature of the composition of vaccines and the paucity of information volunteered to the public on the manufacturing processes and ingredients that go into these products, how does one go about navigating this subject?

    Conventional wisdom might suggest, “Ask your doctor.” But how independent are these doctors?

    Where do you turn when you discover physicians and pediatricians, who have a legal duty to fully inform patients about vaccine risks and side effects, have ideological and material incentives to avoid presenting specific information that might cause a parent to question a vaccine?

    What about educational materials and advice from the agencies tasked with protecting public health? Can we trust the FDA and the CDC to provide detailed and unbiased information when it is known that they get substantial amounts of money from vaccine manufacturers?

    Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics and medical law that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care.This includes being given a thorough account of the risks and benefits of treatments, alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and their right to refuse treatment.

    Informed and individualized health care decisions about any product one puts into their or their children’s body starts with being fully informed with what is in that product.

    *

    Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

    This article was originally published on Health Freedom Defense Fund.

    Featured image is from HFDF



    https://www.globalresearch.ca/do-you-know-what-vaccine/5839377
    Do You Know What’s in a Vaccine? Chemical Ingredients Addendum to the Childhood Vaccination Series All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name. To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles. *** Over the last few decades, the number of chemicals added to foods and other products has skyrocketed. Chemicals are added to “enhance flavor”, make fruits and vegetables look fresh, extend the shelf life of packaged foods and for other invented reasons. A cornucopia of chemicals are also found in lotions and beauty products with the ostensible reason that these chemicals make beauty products feel, look, and smell nice. Along with this increase in heavily processed foods has come increased skepticism about the necessity of inserting chemical additives into everything we touch and taste. A significant and growing segment of the US population are beginning to examine the health consequences of ingesting and absorbing these chemical-laden products. This growing awareness about the adverse effects of ingesting and absorbing synthetic ingredients and the public’s understanding of the attendant health benefits of consuming products free from synthetic chemicals has prompted consumers to seek out organic ingredient-based items in their foods and skin lotions. More people are showing interest in knowing about the ingredients in their food and striving to ‘eat clean.’ This increased awareness is evidenced in the steady growth of the organic food industry and trends in the natural and organic cosmetic industry where demand is higher than ever. This same level of concern has begun to seep into the public conscience regarding a certain medical product that has mostly avoided scrutiny – the vaccine. Having been trained to accept that this product is a customary aspect of everyday life, most people haven’t given much thought to what’s inside the vaccine vials. Rarely will the vaccine ritual in the doctor’s office include a discussion about the ingredients which are about to be injected into the patient’s body. It’s highly likely the physicians and nurses themselves don’t know the ingredients of each vaccine. So what’s in that vial? What’s coming through that needle? A Partial List of Ingredients Aluminum: Aluminum salts are used in some vaccine formulations as an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a substance added to vaccines to ostensibly enhance the immune response. Examples of aluminum salts in some vaccines are aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, alum (potassium aluminum sulfate) or mixed aluminum salts. In a 2011 study Canadian scientists Professor Christopher Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic stated the following: “Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences.” Multiple studies have shown that the intramuscularly injected aluminum vaccine adjuvant is absorbed into the systemic circulation and travels to different sites in the body, such as the brain, joints, and the spleen, where it accumulates and is retained for years post-vaccination. Mercury (thimerosal): Thimerosal is an ethyl mercury-based preservative used in vials that contain more than one dose of a vaccine (multi-dose vials) to prevent germs, bacteria and/or fungi from contaminating the vaccine. While in decline some flu vaccines and childhood vaccines in multi-dose vials still utilize thimerosal. Mercury is known to be a genotoxic agent, even in minute concentrations, which can damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer. A meta-analysis epidemiological study suggested thimerosal containing vaccines significantly increased the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders. A 2011 study suggested there may be higher rates of blood and brain mercury levels in monkeys exposed to vaccines containing thimerosal. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Public Health Service (1999) published a joint statement that urged “all government agencies to work rapidly toward reducing children’s exposure to mercury from all sources.” Gelatin: Gelatin is used as a stabilizer in some vaccines licensed in the U.S. Stabilizers are added to vaccines to protect the active ingredients from degrading during manufacture, transport and storage. Gelatin is a protein obtained from cows or pigs and produced by the partial hydrolysis of collagen extracted by boiling animal parts such as cartilage, tendons, skin, bones and ligaments in water. Some people might have a severe allergic reaction to it. Certain vaccine viruses are grown on gelatin derived from the ligaments of pigs fed heavy doses of glyphosate in their feed. Gelatin comes from collagen which has lots of glycine. Gelatin is one of the most commonly identified causes of allergic reactions to vaccines. A 1999 Japanese study showed most anaphylactic reactions and some urticarial reactions to gelatin-containing measles, mumps, and rubella monovalent vaccines were associated with gelatin allergy. Based on these findings Japan removed gelatin from vaccines in 2000. Formaldehyde: Formaldehyde is used during the manufacture of some vaccines to inactivate viruses (like polio and hepatitis A viruses) or bacterial toxins (like diphtheria and tetanus toxins). Formaldehyde is a human carcinogen based on evidence from cancer studies in humans and is listed as aknown to be human carcinogen in the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) Twelfth Report on Carcinogens(2011). Phenol/Phenoxyethanol: Phenoxyethanol is used in vaccines and biologics as a preservative to prevent microbial growth. A 2010 study, The relative toxicity of compounds used as preservatives in vaccines and biologics, assessed the relative cytotoxicity of the levels of the compounds commonly used as preservative in US licensed vaccines and found that for phenoxyethanol it was 4.6-fold, for phenol 12.2-fold and for Thimerosal >330-fold. They concluded, “None of the compounds commonly used as preservatives in US licensed vaccine/biological preparations can be considered an ideal preservative, and their ability to fully comply with the requirements of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for preservatives is in doubt.” Case reports (here, here and here) have suggested a link between phenoxyethanol and urticaria (hives), eczema and anaphylaxis. Triton X-100: Triton X –100 or octylphenol ethoxylate (OPE) is a surfactant (reducing the surface tension of liquids) and stabilizer present in some influenza vaccines. OPEs are endocrine disruptors and break down relatively easily into Octylphenols (OPs), which are more harmful. Endocrine disruptors can alter reproductive function, increase incidences of breast cancer, affect growth patterns and neurodevelopment in children and change immune function. Squalene: Squalene is a naturally-occurring substance derived primarily from shark liver oil. When combined with other ingredients it becomes an adjuvant, which, like aluminum, is added to vaccines to elicit a stronger immune response from the body. A 2000 study demonstrated that one intradermal injection of squalene adjuvant produced arthritis in rats. Some believe that Gulf War Syndrome was linked to the presence of squalene in certain lots of the anthrax vaccine. Beta-propiolactone: Beta-propiolactone (BPL) is a commonly used reagent for the inactivation of viruses for use in vaccine preparations. It has recently been used in the development of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine preparation. Beta-propiolactone is a known carcinogen. Local sarcomas have been produced by subcutaneous injection of beta-propiolactone in rats. In the laboratory sarcomas and squamous papillomas in mice were produced by a single subcutaneous injection of a minute amount of beta-propiolactone. Polysorbate 80: Polysorbate 80 is present in some vaccines to stop the vaccine from separating into its component parts. In a PubMed study Polysorbate 80 was described as, “a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.” In a pharmacological study on mice and rats Polysorbate 80 produced, “mild to moderate depression of the central nervous system with a marked reduction in locomotor activity and rectal temperature, exhibited ataxia and paralytic activity and potentiated the pentobarbital sleeping time.” The results of that study concluded, “The results of the present study indicate that polysorbate 80 can neither be used as a solvent for isolated tissue experiments nor when considered for intravenous administration.” Another study from the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) suggested the dietary emulsifier polysorbate 80 may induce low-grade inflammation which may contribute to metabolic diseases and increase the potential for development in colon cancer. Genetically modified yeast: S. cerevisiae, a species of yeast, is used in vaccines in a variety of ways. It is used as an adjuvant and now through genetic manipulation it is being used to create artificial antibodies Studies have suggested that genetically engineered yeast used in vaccines may be a contributing factor to autoimmune disorders. Monosodium Glutamate (MSG): Monosodium Glutamate is used in small amounts in some vaccines to keep them stable and protect them from losing potency even when exposed to heat and light. In a study that looked at rat fertility and MSG consumption the authors found there was a negative impact on the rats’ fertility. In another study it was noted that chronic MSG intake caused kidney dysfunction and renal oxidative stress in the animal model. Cells From Aborted Fetus: Fetal cell lines are used to grow viruses which are then collected from the cell cultures and processed further to produce the vaccine itself. The cell lines are propagated from lung tissue of mature aborted and used in the current manufacture of a number of routine vaccines, including measles, mumps and rubella (MMRV), diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and polio, (DTaP-IPV), Hepatitis A and chickenpox. Aborted fetal cells are listed on vaccine package inserts as “Human Fetal Diploid Cells.” Two aborted fetal cell lines, WI-38 and MRC-5, have been grown under laboratory conditions since the 1960s. Diploid cells (WI-38, MRC-5) vaccines have their origin in induced abortions. The use of such cell lines can be profoundly objectionable to segments of the population who hold certain religious and/or philosophical beliefs. The Italian vaccine research and advocacy organization Corvelva released a study in 2019 regarding the use of aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines. In their summary they highlighted the following: The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual. 560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications. There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer. What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants. Serum From Aborted Calf Fetus Blood: The purpose for the fetal bovine serum is to provide a nutrient broth for viruses to grow in cells. Humane Research Australia describes the process of how the blood is collected, “The blood is collected after the slaughter of a mature female cow, the mother’s uterus containing the calf fetus is removed during the evisceration process and transferred to the blood collection room. A needle is then inserted between the fetus’s ribs directly into its heart and the blood is vacuumed into a sterile collection bag. Only fetuses over the age of three months are used otherwise the heart is considered too small to puncture. Once collected, the blood is allowed to clot at room temperature and the serum separated through a process known as refrigerated centrifugation.” Beyond certain ethical considerations scientists have found that different bovine tissues contain different amounts of the BSE agent. Antibiotics: Antibiotics are used during the manufacturing process of some vaccines to stop bacteria growing and contaminating the vaccine. Antibiotics found in some vaccines include neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin b, gentamicin and kanamycin. Polymyxin B comes with a warning that, “This medicine has not been fully studied in pregnant women. This medicine may cause kidney problems. This medicine may cause nerve problems”, as well as a laundry list of side effects. Similar warnings are found with streptomycin, neomycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin. A study out of Finland raised concerns about excessive antibiotic use in early childhood which may lead to weight gain and altered gut bacteria. What Else Could be in That Needle? The list above is not a complete account of all the ingredients found in various vaccine cocktails. A comprehensive manufacturers’ catalog of ingredients can be found here, here and here. The reality is that even a complete list issued by the producer doesn’t tell the entire story of what is found in vaccines. Using an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe a group of Italian scientists examined 44 samples of 30 different vaccines and found dangerous contaminants, including metal toxicants in 43 of the 44 samples tested. In the study, published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, the researchers detected lead, chromium, nickel and other metals in every adjuvant sample tested. Additional metal contaminants identified in 25 of the human vaccines included platinum, silver, bismuth, iron, and chromium. Foreign impurities such as zirconium, hafnium, strontium, tungsten, antimony, bismuth, cerium and were also detected in many of the vaccines tested. The researchers commenting on their unexpected findings reported: The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring….In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants. [Emphasis added] When interviewed lead scientist Dr. Antonietta Gatti, of the National Council of Research of Italy and Scientific Director of Nanodiagnostics, explained that the discovery of vaccine impurities shocked the researchers: Those particles should not have been there. We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act of faith on which it seemed impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated our analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence. Speculating on the potential consequences of these foreign impurities Dr. Gatti stated: The particles, be they isolated, aggregated or clustered, are not supposed to be there… Our tissues perceive these foreign bodies as potential enemies…Unfortunately, though, the particles we found in vaccines, are not biodegradable. So, all the macrophages’ efforts will be useless, and depending on the exact chemicals involved, the particles may be especially toxic. Cytokines and pro-inflammatory substances in general are released and granulated tissue forms, enveloping the particles. This provokes inflammation which, in the long run, if locally persistent, is known to be a precursor to cancer. Along with unlisted metal contaminants another unlisted contaminant was noted in some vaccines when a preliminary screening result from Microbe Inotech Laboratories Inc. detected glyphosate in the childhood vaccines they tested. Merck’s MMR II vaccine had 2.671 parts per billion (ppb) of glyphosate, Sanofi Pasteur’s DTap Adacel vaccine had 0.123 ppb, Novartis’ Influenza Fluvirin had 0.331 ppb, Glaxo Smith Kline’s HepB Energix-B vaccine had 0.325 ppb, Merck’s Pneumococcal Vax Polyvalent Pneumovax 23 had 0.107 ppb of glyphosate. These findings prompted Moms Across America to send a letter to the FDA, CDC, EPA,NIH and California Department of Health requesting that they test vaccines for glyphosate and recall contaminated vaccines. MIT scientist Dr. Stephanie Seneff remarked on the route by which glyphosate could get into vaccines: Collagen is a protein found in large amounts in the ligaments of cows, and these ligaments are often used in the production of gelatin. The MMR vaccine and flu vaccine viruses are grown as live cultures on gelatin sourced from cows fed high concentrations of glyphosate in their GMO Roundup­Ready feed. What to Do? Given the complex nature of the composition of vaccines and the paucity of information volunteered to the public on the manufacturing processes and ingredients that go into these products, how does one go about navigating this subject? Conventional wisdom might suggest, “Ask your doctor.” But how independent are these doctors? Where do you turn when you discover physicians and pediatricians, who have a legal duty to fully inform patients about vaccine risks and side effects, have ideological and material incentives to avoid presenting specific information that might cause a parent to question a vaccine? What about educational materials and advice from the agencies tasked with protecting public health? Can we trust the FDA and the CDC to provide detailed and unbiased information when it is known that they get substantial amounts of money from vaccine manufacturers? Informed consent is a principle in medical ethics and medical law that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care.This includes being given a thorough account of the risks and benefits of treatments, alternative treatments, the patient’s role in treatment, and their right to refuse treatment. Informed and individualized health care decisions about any product one puts into their or their children’s body starts with being fully informed with what is in that product. * Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles. This article was originally published on Health Freedom Defense Fund. Featured image is from HFDF https://www.globalresearch.ca/do-you-know-what-vaccine/5839377
    WWW.GLOBALRESEARCH.CA
    Do You Know What’s in a Vaccine? Chemical Ingredients
    All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name. To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 20107 Views
  • https://media.wired.com/photos/598a36a7f15ef46f2c68ebab/master/w_2560,c_limit/iStock-696221484.jpg Image Source: https://media.wired.com/photos/
    The emergence of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies has sparked intense speculation and debate about their future prospects. Ethereum, one of the leading blockchain platforms and cryptocurrencies, has garnered significant attention and adoption due to its smart contract capabilities. However, the question remains: will Ethereum be defeated by its competitors or other technological challenges? This essay aims to explore the factors that could influence Ethereum's future trajectory and provide an analysis of its potential triumph or defeat.
    Ethereum's Strengths and Achievements:
    Ethereum's success lies in its innovative features, including the ability to develop decentralized applications (DApps) and launch tokens through smart contracts. The Ethereum network has fostered a vibrant ecosystem, attracting developers, startups, and investors. Its early mover advantage, widespread adoption, and community support have established Ethereum as a leading player in the blockchain space.
    Scalability Challenges:
    One of the primary criticisms of Ethereum is its scalability limitations. As the network became increasingly congested and transaction fees surged during peak usage periods, scalability concerns became apparent. However, the Ethereum community has been actively addressing these challenges through upgrades like Ethereum 2.0, which promises to introduce improvements in scalability, security, and sustainability. If successful, these upgrades could enhance Ethereum's competitiveness and mitigate scalability concerns.
    Competition from Rival Blockchain Platforms:
    While Ethereum currently dominates the market, it faces competition from other blockchain platforms that offer similar functionalities or focus on specific niches. Platforms like Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and Polkadot have gained traction, attracting developers and users with faster transaction speeds and lower fees. Ethereum's ability to maintain its market share in the face of such competition will depend on its ability to address scalability concerns, improve user experience, and foster innovation.
    Regulatory and Legal Challenges:
    The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies remains uncertain and subject to change. Government regulations and legal frameworks can significantly impact the adoption and growth of Ethereum. Stricter regulations or unfavorable legal rulings could hinder Ethereum's progress and create obstacles for its future development. However, proactive engagement with regulators and compliance measures can help Ethereum navigate these challenges and establish itself as a trusted and regulated platform.
    Technological Advancements:
    The success or defeat of Ethereum will also depend on its ability to adapt and evolve with technological advancements. Emerging technologies like layer 2 solutions, interoperability protocols, and advancements in consensus algorithms could potentially address Ethereum's scalability concerns and enhance its capabilities. Additionally, Ethereum's ability to leverage emerging trends, such as decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized applications, will play a crucial role in determining its future success.
    Conclusion:
    Predicting the fate of Ethereum with certainty is impossible. However, Ethereum's resilience, strong community support, and ongoing efforts to address scalability challenges through upgrades like Ethereum 2.0 suggest that it has the potential to overcome obstacles and maintain its position as a dominant blockchain platform. The outcome will be influenced by Ethereum's ability to adapt to market demands, address technological challenges, navigate regulatory hurdles, and foster continued innovation. While competition exists and threats loom, Ethereum's continued success will depend on its ability to evolve and remain at the forefront of blockchain technology.
    Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha
    https://media.wired.com/photos/598a36a7f15ef46f2c68ebab/master/w_2560,c_limit/iStock-696221484.jpg Image Source: https://media.wired.com/photos/ The emergence of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies has sparked intense speculation and debate about their future prospects. Ethereum, one of the leading blockchain platforms and cryptocurrencies, has garnered significant attention and adoption due to its smart contract capabilities. However, the question remains: will Ethereum be defeated by its competitors or other technological challenges? This essay aims to explore the factors that could influence Ethereum's future trajectory and provide an analysis of its potential triumph or defeat. Ethereum's Strengths and Achievements: Ethereum's success lies in its innovative features, including the ability to develop decentralized applications (DApps) and launch tokens through smart contracts. The Ethereum network has fostered a vibrant ecosystem, attracting developers, startups, and investors. Its early mover advantage, widespread adoption, and community support have established Ethereum as a leading player in the blockchain space. Scalability Challenges: One of the primary criticisms of Ethereum is its scalability limitations. As the network became increasingly congested and transaction fees surged during peak usage periods, scalability concerns became apparent. However, the Ethereum community has been actively addressing these challenges through upgrades like Ethereum 2.0, which promises to introduce improvements in scalability, security, and sustainability. If successful, these upgrades could enhance Ethereum's competitiveness and mitigate scalability concerns. Competition from Rival Blockchain Platforms: While Ethereum currently dominates the market, it faces competition from other blockchain platforms that offer similar functionalities or focus on specific niches. Platforms like Binance Smart Chain, Solana, and Polkadot have gained traction, attracting developers and users with faster transaction speeds and lower fees. Ethereum's ability to maintain its market share in the face of such competition will depend on its ability to address scalability concerns, improve user experience, and foster innovation. Regulatory and Legal Challenges: The regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies remains uncertain and subject to change. Government regulations and legal frameworks can significantly impact the adoption and growth of Ethereum. Stricter regulations or unfavorable legal rulings could hinder Ethereum's progress and create obstacles for its future development. However, proactive engagement with regulators and compliance measures can help Ethereum navigate these challenges and establish itself as a trusted and regulated platform. Technological Advancements: The success or defeat of Ethereum will also depend on its ability to adapt and evolve with technological advancements. Emerging technologies like layer 2 solutions, interoperability protocols, and advancements in consensus algorithms could potentially address Ethereum's scalability concerns and enhance its capabilities. Additionally, Ethereum's ability to leverage emerging trends, such as decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized applications, will play a crucial role in determining its future success. Conclusion: Predicting the fate of Ethereum with certainty is impossible. However, Ethereum's resilience, strong community support, and ongoing efforts to address scalability challenges through upgrades like Ethereum 2.0 suggest that it has the potential to overcome obstacles and maintain its position as a dominant blockchain platform. The outcome will be influenced by Ethereum's ability to adapt to market demands, address technological challenges, navigate regulatory hurdles, and foster continued innovation. While competition exists and threats loom, Ethereum's continued success will depend on its ability to evolve and remain at the forefront of blockchain technology. Posted Using LeoFinance Alpha
    Like
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 14534 Views
  • Tinea capitis, otherwise known as scalp ringworm, is a fungal infection of the scalp. It is more prevalent among young children than adults. The fungi causing the infection can be caught from animals such as dogs, cats, guinea pigs and cattle. Some people are carriers of tinea capitis. These people do not have any symptoms of the infectionTinea capitis, otherwise known as scalp ringworm, is a fungal infection of the scalp. It i
    Tinea capitis, otherwise known as scalp ringworm, is a fungal infection of the scalp. It is more prevalent among young children than adults. The fungi causing the infection can be caught from animals such as dogs, cats, guinea pigs and cattle. Some people are carriers of tinea capitis. These people do not have any symptoms of the infectionTinea capitis, otherwise known as scalp ringworm, is a fungal infection of the scalp. It i
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3163 Views
  • Bob Yirka - Using mycelium to create a self-healing wearable leather-like material:

    https://phys.org/news/2023-04-mycelium-self-healing-wearable-leather-like-material.html

    #MyceliumLeather #Mycelium #Fungi #Chlamydospores #SelfRepair #FifthKingdom #Biotechnology #Biomimicry #Biology
    Bob Yirka - Using mycelium to create a self-healing wearable leather-like material: https://phys.org/news/2023-04-mycelium-self-healing-wearable-leather-like-material.html #MyceliumLeather #Mycelium #Fungi #Chlamydospores #SelfRepair #FifthKingdom #Biotechnology #Biomimicry #Biology
    PHYS.ORG
    Using mycelium to create a self-healing wearable leather-like material
    A pair of biotechnologists at Newcastle University, working with a colleague from Northumbria University, all in the U.K., have developed a way to use mycelium to create a self-healing wearable material. In their paper published in the journal Advanced Functional Materials, Elise Elsacker, Martyn Dade-Robertson and Meng Zhang, describe their process and how well it worked when tested.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2558 Views

  • Image Source
    The year 2023 marks an important milestone for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization. Since its inception in 2015, Ethereum has been at the forefront of innovation in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space, and the coming year promises to be no different.
    One of the most significant developments in the Ethereum ecosystem in 2023 is the much-anticipated launch of Ethereum 2.0, also known as Serenity. Ethereum 2.0 is a major upgrade that promises to improve the scalability, security, and sustainability of the Ethereum network. The upgrade involves the transition from the current proof-of-work consensus algorithm to a proof-of-stake algorithm, which is expected to reduce energy consumption and increase transaction throughput.
    With the launch of Ethereum 2.0, the Ethereum community is hoping to solve some of the most pressing issues facing the network, including slow transaction times and high fees. This could potentially open up new use cases for Ethereum, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which have already gained significant traction on the Ethereum network.
    In addition to technical upgrades, Ethereum is also expected to see increased adoption and integration into mainstream financial services in 2023. This is due in part to the growing interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, which are built on the Ethereum network and allow users to access financial services without intermediaries.
    Furthermore, the rise of NFTs has brought new attention to the potential of blockchain technology for creating and managing digital assets. NFTs are unique digital assets that are stored on the Ethereum blockchain, and their popularity has exploded in recent years, with NFT sales reaching record-breaking levels.
    Another factor driving the adoption of Ethereum is the growing interest in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which are digital versions of traditional fiat currencies issued by central banks. Several countries are exploring the possibility of issuing CBDCs, and some are considering using Ethereum as the underlying technology.
    In conclusion, 2023 is shaping up to be an exciting year for Ethereum, with the launch of Ethereum 2.0 and increased adoption and integration into mainstream financial services. The continued growth of the DeFi and NFT markets, as well as the potential use of Ethereum for CBDCs, are all promising developments that could further solidify Ethereum's position as a leading blockchain and cryptocurrency platform.
    Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
    Image Source The year 2023 marks an important milestone for Ethereum, the world's second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization. Since its inception in 2015, Ethereum has been at the forefront of innovation in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space, and the coming year promises to be no different. One of the most significant developments in the Ethereum ecosystem in 2023 is the much-anticipated launch of Ethereum 2.0, also known as Serenity. Ethereum 2.0 is a major upgrade that promises to improve the scalability, security, and sustainability of the Ethereum network. The upgrade involves the transition from the current proof-of-work consensus algorithm to a proof-of-stake algorithm, which is expected to reduce energy consumption and increase transaction throughput. With the launch of Ethereum 2.0, the Ethereum community is hoping to solve some of the most pressing issues facing the network, including slow transaction times and high fees. This could potentially open up new use cases for Ethereum, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which have already gained significant traction on the Ethereum network. In addition to technical upgrades, Ethereum is also expected to see increased adoption and integration into mainstream financial services in 2023. This is due in part to the growing interest in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, which are built on the Ethereum network and allow users to access financial services without intermediaries. Furthermore, the rise of NFTs has brought new attention to the potential of blockchain technology for creating and managing digital assets. NFTs are unique digital assets that are stored on the Ethereum blockchain, and their popularity has exploded in recent years, with NFT sales reaching record-breaking levels. Another factor driving the adoption of Ethereum is the growing interest in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which are digital versions of traditional fiat currencies issued by central banks. Several countries are exploring the possibility of issuing CBDCs, and some are considering using Ethereum as the underlying technology. In conclusion, 2023 is shaping up to be an exciting year for Ethereum, with the launch of Ethereum 2.0 and increased adoption and integration into mainstream financial services. The continued growth of the DeFi and NFT markets, as well as the potential use of Ethereum for CBDCs, are all promising developments that could further solidify Ethereum's position as a leading blockchain and cryptocurrency platform. Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2558 Views
  • This cactus is so unique looking. It really looks like the fungi from "The Last Of Us" series.????
    So scary looking. Hope this doesnt go alive. lol. ????

    >> #SoMee Original Shots <<
    This cactus is so unique looking. It really looks like the fungi from "The Last Of Us" series.???? So scary looking. Hope this doesnt go alive. lol. ???? >> #SoMee Original Shots <<
    Like
    13
    0 Comments 0 Shares 987 Views
  • Hello Somee, long time since I stopped by here. Fall is arriving, days get colder and shorter but the good thing is that mushrooms arrive. Hopefully, it will be a fruitful season in that regard. Remember: a healthy soil has mushrooms, not fungicide! Have a great week ????????

    #fungi
    #mushrooms
    #outdoors
    #nature
    #pob
    #cent
    Hello Somee, long time since I stopped by here. Fall is arriving, days get colder and shorter but the good thing is that mushrooms arrive. Hopefully, it will be a fruitful season in that regard. Remember: a healthy soil has mushrooms, not fungicide! Have a great week ???????? #fungi #mushrooms #outdoors #nature #pob #cent
    Like
    Love
    8
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2816 Views
  • Disney in 2020/2021 were ranked among top production companies that benefited from non-fungible token (NFTS) sales, seems like these NFTS hype are declining and the company can't keep up paying cost, a report from wall street journal shows Disney will be laying off about 7,000 staff on its metaverse team.

    #awesme #crypto #somee #web

    [Image source](https://www.instagram.com/p/CqVeLyaOJh9/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=)
    Disney in 2020/2021 were ranked among top production companies that benefited from non-fungible token (NFTS) sales, seems like these NFTS hype are declining and the company can't keep up paying cost, a report from wall street journal shows Disney will be laying off about 7,000 staff on its metaverse team. #awesme #crypto #somee #web [Image source](https://www.instagram.com/p/CqVeLyaOJh9/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=)
    Like
    10
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2870 Views
  • greetings everyone

    Today I will be lecturing on the ERC 1155 Token, If you are interested in learning how NFTs work, this is the foundational course.

    The ERC 1155 token could be seen as a major token with roots in Ethereum

    The lesson unfolds light on ERC-20 and ERC -721 tokens and we can reconcile this to the ERC 1155 because they can behave like the previously mentioned tokens or serve as both at the same time. This percept produces an intelligent planned network that can manage any amount of fungible and non-fungible tokens.

    The lesson gives formats on the structure of the tokens and the same is applied here with the ERC-1155 token better explained in its derivation as EIP ie Ethereum Improvement Proposal from the nomenclature EIP- 1155.

    There were necessities leading to the installation of these tokens since there were limitations to what the ERC-20 (fungible tokens ) and the ERC-721 (non fungible tokens ) were since they embody both features. For instance, the ERC 20 had a problem in the organization of transfers and brought huge undeniable losses when users made wrong transfers and the ERC-721 with identification issues therefore the ERC-1155 token was installed to help out with the shortcomings of these already existing tokens.

    These already existing tokens were also unable to work with each other and so functions that needed both of them could be better solved with ERC 1155 which offers both features and leaves a very secure platform.

    We could also refer to the NFT ENJIN that uses this token for service operations

    #AweSME #NFT #SoMee #someeofficial #SME #
    greetings everyone Today I will be lecturing on the ERC 1155 Token, If you are interested in learning how NFTs work, this is the foundational course. The ERC 1155 token could be seen as a major token with roots in Ethereum The lesson unfolds light on ERC-20 and ERC -721 tokens and we can reconcile this to the ERC 1155 because they can behave like the previously mentioned tokens or serve as both at the same time. This percept produces an intelligent planned network that can manage any amount of fungible and non-fungible tokens. The lesson gives formats on the structure of the tokens and the same is applied here with the ERC-1155 token better explained in its derivation as EIP ie Ethereum Improvement Proposal from the nomenclature EIP- 1155. There were necessities leading to the installation of these tokens since there were limitations to what the ERC-20 (fungible tokens ) and the ERC-721 (non fungible tokens ) were since they embody both features. For instance, the ERC 20 had a problem in the organization of transfers and brought huge undeniable losses when users made wrong transfers and the ERC-721 with identification issues therefore the ERC-1155 token was installed to help out with the shortcomings of these already existing tokens. These already existing tokens were also unable to work with each other and so functions that needed both of them could be better solved with ERC 1155 which offers both features and leaves a very secure platform. We could also refer to the NFT ENJIN that uses this token for service operations #AweSME #NFT #SoMee #someeofficial #SME #
    Like
    Love
    8
    1 Comments 0 Shares 2208 Views
  • Microsoft Testing Integration of Web3 Wallet into Edge BrowserMicrosoft is reportedly testing the integration of a Web3 wallet into its Edge browser. According to alleged screenshots shared by software documenter and occasional leaker of information Albacore, the wallet would be non-custodial and NFT-compliant, compatible with cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens.https://www.geekmetaverse.com/microsoft-testing-integration-of-web3-wallet-into-edge-browser/#Microsoft #wallet #CryptoWallet #web3 #web3community #web3wallet #crypto #cryptocurrency #edgebrowser #noncustodial #nft #bitcoin #BTC #somee #someeofficial #dbuzz
    Microsoft Testing Integration of Web3 Wallet into Edge BrowserMicrosoft is reportedly testing the integration of a Web3 wallet into its Edge browser. According to alleged screenshots shared by software documenter and occasional leaker of information Albacore, the wallet would be non-custodial and NFT-compliant, compatible with cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens.https://www.geekmetaverse.com/microsoft-testing-integration-of-web3-wallet-into-edge-browser/#Microsoft #wallet #CryptoWallet #web3 #web3community #web3wallet #crypto #cryptocurrency #edgebrowser #noncustodial #nft #bitcoin #BTC #somee #someeofficial #dbuzz
    WWW.GEEKMETAVERSE.COM
    Microsoft Testing Integration of Web3 Wallet into Edge Browser
    Microsoft is reportedly testing the integration of a Web3 wallet into its Edge browser. According to alleged screenshots shared by software documenter and
    Like
    3
    1 Comments 0 Shares 3994 Views
  • The Bitcoin community has recently been abuzz with an existential debate over a new NFT project called Ordinals. The project, which is set to launch in the coming weeks, seeks to create a unique token system based on “ordinal numbers” that will allow users to assign numerical values and rankings (i.e., first place, second place) to digital assets such as artworks or collectibles.

    At its core, the goal of Ordinals is two fold: firstly it aims at creating an open-source platform for trading and exchanging these tokens; secondly it wants to establish an authoritative ranking system for digital items that could be used by collectors and investors alike when making decisions about what assets are worth buying or selling. This would provide buyers with more information about their purchases than ever before – something many consider essential in this rapidly growing market of non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

    However despite its potential promise there has been much criticism surrounding the concept from within the Bitcoin community - particularly those who believe that assigning value through rank orderings goes against Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision for cryptocurrency decentralization. These critics suggest that introducing arbitrary ordering systems into blockchain technology runs counterintuitively against one of Bitcoin's primary goals - namely trustless transactions between individuals without any third party intermediary involved whatsoever! While some may agree with this sentiment others argue just as strongly in favor of using ordinal numbers as they can help facilitate greater liquidity amongst traders while simultaneously providing additional insight into asset valuation models not previously available via traditional methods alone

    Ultimately only time will tell if Ordinals proves successful but regardless both sides have made compelling arguments regarding why either approach should be adopted moving forward so we'll all have wait until launch day arrives later this month!
    The Bitcoin community has recently been abuzz with an existential debate over a new NFT project called Ordinals. The project, which is set to launch in the coming weeks, seeks to create a unique token system based on “ordinal numbers” that will allow users to assign numerical values and rankings (i.e., first place, second place) to digital assets such as artworks or collectibles. At its core, the goal of Ordinals is two fold: firstly it aims at creating an open-source platform for trading and exchanging these tokens; secondly it wants to establish an authoritative ranking system for digital items that could be used by collectors and investors alike when making decisions about what assets are worth buying or selling. This would provide buyers with more information about their purchases than ever before – something many consider essential in this rapidly growing market of non-fungible tokens (NFTs). However despite its potential promise there has been much criticism surrounding the concept from within the Bitcoin community - particularly those who believe that assigning value through rank orderings goes against Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision for cryptocurrency decentralization. These critics suggest that introducing arbitrary ordering systems into blockchain technology runs counterintuitively against one of Bitcoin's primary goals - namely trustless transactions between individuals without any third party intermediary involved whatsoever! While some may agree with this sentiment others argue just as strongly in favor of using ordinal numbers as they can help facilitate greater liquidity amongst traders while simultaneously providing additional insight into asset valuation models not previously available via traditional methods alone Ultimately only time will tell if Ordinals proves successful but regardless both sides have made compelling arguments regarding why either approach should be adopted moving forward so we'll all have wait until launch day arrives later this month!
    Like
    Love
    6
    0 Comments 0 Shares 4024 Views
  • Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based artificial intelligence social platform. This disruptive social network is using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, as well as creating tokenized content within the decentralized Uhive economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2, to shake up the social media industry. At the core of Uhive's innovative applications is Oasis; a VR-powered interactive physical dimension containing an infinite number of "spaces." These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but the similarities stop there.Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based, AI-powered social platform. This disruptive social network is shaking up the social media industry using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, along with tokenized content creation within Uhive's decentralized economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2.

    Just download the app and log in
    Visit the product page to learn more .
    I am placing my affiliate link: https://cutt.ly/k9FHzm1
    Your invite code: A3FQID

    At the heart of Uhive's innovative app is Oasis; an interactive, VR-supported, physical dimension comprising an infinite number of 'spaces'. These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but that's where the similarities end.

    What are Uhive spaces?

    Think of Uhive spaces as parcels of virtual land, some with and some without properties. Their intrinsic value fluctuates and depends on many factors, including but not limited to; location, the level of engagement a space receives, and the quantity and quality of followers a space has (follower quality is determined by their social scale ).

    As far as social media is concerned, the concept of virtual real estate is unique to Uhive, but Uhive goes a step further by turning spaces into non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Back in 2018, Uhive foresaw the benefits of rewarding content creators, and from the beginning, the Uhive team designed these spaces as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

    Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based artificial intelligence social platform. This disruptive social network is using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, as well as creating tokenized content within the decentralized Uhive economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2, to shake up the social media industry. At the core of Uhive's innovative applications is Oasis; a VR-powered interactive physical dimension containing an infinite number of "spaces." These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but the similarities stop there.Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based, AI-powered social platform. This disruptive social network is shaking up the social media industry using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, along with tokenized content creation within Uhive's decentralized economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2.

    Just download the app and log in
    Visit the product page to learn more .
    I am placing my affiliate link
    Your invite code: A3FQID

    At the heart of Uhive's innovative app is Oasis; an interactive, VR-supported, physical dimension comprising an infinite number of 'spaces'. These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but that's where the similarities end.

    What are Uhive spaces?

    Think of Uhive spaces as parcels of virtual land, some with and some without properties. Their intrinsic value fluctuates and depends on many factors, including but not limited to; location, the level of engagement a space receives, and the quantity and quality of followers a space has (follower quality is determined by their social scale ).

    As far as social media is concerned, the concept of virtual real estate is unique to Uhive, but Uhive goes a step further by turning spaces into non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Back in 2018, Uhive foresaw the benefits of rewarding content creators, and from the beginning, the Uhive team designed these spaces as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

    Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based artificial intelligence social platform. This disruptive social network is using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, as well as creating tokenized content within the decentralized Uhive economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2, to shake up the social media industry. At the core of Uhive's innovative applications is Oasis; a VR-powered interactive physical dimension containing an infinite number of "spaces." These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but the similarities stop there.Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based, AI-powered social platform. This disruptive social network is shaking up the social media industry using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, along with tokenized content creation within Uhive's decentralized economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2. Just download the app and log in Visit the product page to learn more . I am placing my affiliate link: https://cutt.ly/k9FHzm1 Your invite code: A3FQID At the heart of Uhive's innovative app is Oasis; an interactive, VR-supported, physical dimension comprising an infinite number of 'spaces'. These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but that's where the similarities end. What are Uhive spaces? Think of Uhive spaces as parcels of virtual land, some with and some without properties. Their intrinsic value fluctuates and depends on many factors, including but not limited to; location, the level of engagement a space receives, and the quantity and quality of followers a space has (follower quality is determined by their social scale ). As far as social media is concerned, the concept of virtual real estate is unique to Uhive, but Uhive goes a step further by turning spaces into non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Back in 2018, Uhive foresaw the benefits of rewarding content creators, and from the beginning, the Uhive team designed these spaces as non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based artificial intelligence social platform. This disruptive social network is using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, as well as creating tokenized content within the decentralized Uhive economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2, to shake up the social media industry. At the core of Uhive's innovative applications is Oasis; a VR-powered interactive physical dimension containing an infinite number of "spaces." These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but the similarities stop there.Uhive is the world's first blockchain-based, AI-powered social platform. This disruptive social network is shaking up the social media industry using a unique and innovative interest-based content discovery model, along with tokenized content creation within Uhive's decentralized economy and its own cryptocurrency - Uhive Token HVE2. Just download the app and log in Visit the product page to learn more . I am placing my affiliate link Your invite code: A3FQID At the heart of Uhive's innovative app is Oasis; an interactive, VR-supported, physical dimension comprising an infinite number of 'spaces'. These spaces are similar to profiles or pages on other social platforms, but that's where the similarities end. What are Uhive spaces? Think of Uhive spaces as parcels of virtual land, some with and some without properties. Their intrinsic value fluctuates and depends on many factors, including but not limited to; location, the level of engagement a space receives, and the quantity and quality of followers a space has (follower quality is determined by their social scale ). As far as social media is concerned, the concept of virtual real estate is unique to Uhive, but Uhive goes a step further by turning spaces into non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Back in 2018, Uhive foresaw the benefits of rewarding content creators, and from the beginning, the Uhive team designed these spaces as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2672 Views