• Higher food prices, combined with increasing poverty, have resulted in rising food unaffordability, especially in certain regions of the world. Visual Capitalist presents a ranking of food insecurity across the world.
    Higher food prices, combined with increasing poverty, have resulted in rising food unaffordability, especially in certain regions of the world. Visual Capitalist presents a ranking of food insecurity across the world.
    WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COM
    Visualizing Food Unaffordability Across The World - Activist Post
    A person is food insecure when they lack regular access to enough safe and nutritious food for normal growth and development and an active and healthy life.
    Like
    1
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 398 Visualizações
  • You’re Paying for the Israel War. You’ll Also Pay for the Refugees.
    Ryan McMaken
    This article was originally published by Ryan McMaken at The Mises Institute.

    The United States regime has picked sides in the Israel-Hamas war and has committed to funding Israel’s ongoing bombing of non-combatant men, women, and children in the Gaza Strip. Northern Gaza’s infrastructure is now all but destroyed, with millions of Gazans displaced and homeless. Nearly ten times more Gazans than Israelis have now died in the conflict. Many Gazans have fled to the southern portion of Gaza, but homelessness and abject poverty await them there.

    By employing what is essentially the carpet-bombing approach, Tel Aviv has made the choice of adopting a policy that is sure to produce hundreds of thousands of refugees—or perhaps even more than a million. Indeed, many in the Israeli regime are motivated to maximize refugees, and push Gazans out of the country altogether using the Orwellian phrase “voluntary migration.”

    On a military and tactical level, the Israeli state will have no problem accomplishing this. Tel Aviv has an air force, a deep reservoir of American-funded weapons, and a nuclear arsenal. The Israeli military can easily reduce all of Gaza to rubble. But what is sure to result from this is a humanitarian disaster accompanied by a global debate over which foreign country will host the refugees.

    Israeli mouthpieces are already at work pushing the cost onto foreign taxpayers, including American ones. This week, two Israeli politicians—one from the militarist Likud party, and one from the center-left Yesh Atid party—took to the pages of The Wall Street Journal to demand that “countries around the world should offer a haven for Gaza residents who seek relocation.” According to these politicians, “[t]he international community”—i.e., not Israel—”has a moral imperative” to resettle Gazans somewhere outside Israel at not-Israel’s expense.

    It is significant these claims appeared in an American publication. Tel Aviv is the latest welfare-queen regime—in the tradition of Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky—repeatedly haranguing the American public with demands for free money. It’s no coincidence that Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu is now seemingly ubiquitous on American prime-time news programs. His primary job right now is to demand money and favors from Washington and from other Western regimes.

    It will probably work. Americans should get ready for plane-loads of Gaza refugees arriving in their cities, funded by the American taxpayers who can now barely afford to keep up with the price of groceries. This will be sold as a “humanitarian” effort, but anyone who sees through the propaganda will see that it’s really all a cynical effort to please pro-Israel interest groups and Israeli politicians.

    A Pattern of War and Refugees

    This was all predictable from the minute the war started last month.

    The US and its allies have settled into a predictable pattern in foreign policy over the past thirty years: force the taxpayers to pay for the regime’s wars which involve bombing various poor foreign countries “back into the stone age.” Then, once the refugees start pouring out—and the Americans have lost the war, of course—Western regimes then tell the taxpayers back home to cough up even more money to pay for the resettlement of all those refugees whose countries were needlessly destroyed by the bombs dropped by Washington and its allies.

    This is no small phenomenon. A 2020 report from Brown University estimated that 37 million people have been made refugees by the US-led “War on Terrorism.” By 2016, 5.2 million of them reached Europe. In 2022 alone, more than 159,000 refugees arrived by sea in Italy, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, and Malta. Thousands more arrive at the land borders of the EU every year.

    Thanks to the distance from western Asia and North Africa, refugee totals have been smaller in the United States. Nonetheless, the total number of refugees has ranged from 50,000 to 90,000 per year in most years since the US began its war in Afghanistan. This has transformed a number of communities in the United States, however, since refugees often tend to concentrate in specific places along ethnic or religious lines. In the decades of the US’s endless on-again, off-again military meddling in Somalia, tens of thousands of Somali refugees have been relocated to Minnesota at taxpayers’ expense. Since 2018, Minnesota has hosted more than 40,000 Somalia-born migrants (many classified as refugees). Most of the refugees, of course, are concentrated within Minneapolis’ metro population of only 3.5 million. In democracies, this has political consequences.

    It is also important to remember that migrants who enjoy the legal status of refugees are not normal immigrants. Ordinary immigrants arrive at the United States at their own expense. The vast majority must find work on their own if they wish to have an income. They are eligible for few social benefits. Those seeking legal residency, of course, must go through a lengthy administrative process. For example, Mexicans who obtain a work visa in the United States have to work. They don’t show up and receive “free” help from government-funded refugee agencies in finding jobs, apartments, and other government freebies.

    In contrast, all of that is fast-tracked for people labeled “refugees” by the federal government, and most of these refugees are immediately eligible for a wide array of taxpayer-funded benefits. In total, this all costs the taxpayers nearly two billion dollars per year, or $80,000 per refugee per year in the form of federal and state programs including food stamps, child care, and public housing.

    It’s not enough that you pay for the bombs that create the refugees, dear American taxpayer. You’ll also have to pay to resettle those refugees in your town.


    https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/youre-paying-for-the-israel-war-youll-also-pay-for-the-refugees
    You’re Paying for the Israel War. You’ll Also Pay for the Refugees. Ryan McMaken This article was originally published by Ryan McMaken at The Mises Institute. The United States regime has picked sides in the Israel-Hamas war and has committed to funding Israel’s ongoing bombing of non-combatant men, women, and children in the Gaza Strip. Northern Gaza’s infrastructure is now all but destroyed, with millions of Gazans displaced and homeless. Nearly ten times more Gazans than Israelis have now died in the conflict. Many Gazans have fled to the southern portion of Gaza, but homelessness and abject poverty await them there. By employing what is essentially the carpet-bombing approach, Tel Aviv has made the choice of adopting a policy that is sure to produce hundreds of thousands of refugees—or perhaps even more than a million. Indeed, many in the Israeli regime are motivated to maximize refugees, and push Gazans out of the country altogether using the Orwellian phrase “voluntary migration.” On a military and tactical level, the Israeli state will have no problem accomplishing this. Tel Aviv has an air force, a deep reservoir of American-funded weapons, and a nuclear arsenal. The Israeli military can easily reduce all of Gaza to rubble. But what is sure to result from this is a humanitarian disaster accompanied by a global debate over which foreign country will host the refugees. Israeli mouthpieces are already at work pushing the cost onto foreign taxpayers, including American ones. This week, two Israeli politicians—one from the militarist Likud party, and one from the center-left Yesh Atid party—took to the pages of The Wall Street Journal to demand that “countries around the world should offer a haven for Gaza residents who seek relocation.” According to these politicians, “[t]he international community”—i.e., not Israel—”has a moral imperative” to resettle Gazans somewhere outside Israel at not-Israel’s expense. It is significant these claims appeared in an American publication. Tel Aviv is the latest welfare-queen regime—in the tradition of Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky—repeatedly haranguing the American public with demands for free money. It’s no coincidence that Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu is now seemingly ubiquitous on American prime-time news programs. His primary job right now is to demand money and favors from Washington and from other Western regimes. It will probably work. Americans should get ready for plane-loads of Gaza refugees arriving in their cities, funded by the American taxpayers who can now barely afford to keep up with the price of groceries. This will be sold as a “humanitarian” effort, but anyone who sees through the propaganda will see that it’s really all a cynical effort to please pro-Israel interest groups and Israeli politicians. A Pattern of War and Refugees This was all predictable from the minute the war started last month. The US and its allies have settled into a predictable pattern in foreign policy over the past thirty years: force the taxpayers to pay for the regime’s wars which involve bombing various poor foreign countries “back into the stone age.” Then, once the refugees start pouring out—and the Americans have lost the war, of course—Western regimes then tell the taxpayers back home to cough up even more money to pay for the resettlement of all those refugees whose countries were needlessly destroyed by the bombs dropped by Washington and its allies. This is no small phenomenon. A 2020 report from Brown University estimated that 37 million people have been made refugees by the US-led “War on Terrorism.” By 2016, 5.2 million of them reached Europe. In 2022 alone, more than 159,000 refugees arrived by sea in Italy, Greece, Spain, Cyprus, and Malta. Thousands more arrive at the land borders of the EU every year. Thanks to the distance from western Asia and North Africa, refugee totals have been smaller in the United States. Nonetheless, the total number of refugees has ranged from 50,000 to 90,000 per year in most years since the US began its war in Afghanistan. This has transformed a number of communities in the United States, however, since refugees often tend to concentrate in specific places along ethnic or religious lines. In the decades of the US’s endless on-again, off-again military meddling in Somalia, tens of thousands of Somali refugees have been relocated to Minnesota at taxpayers’ expense. Since 2018, Minnesota has hosted more than 40,000 Somalia-born migrants (many classified as refugees). Most of the refugees, of course, are concentrated within Minneapolis’ metro population of only 3.5 million. In democracies, this has political consequences. It is also important to remember that migrants who enjoy the legal status of refugees are not normal immigrants. Ordinary immigrants arrive at the United States at their own expense. The vast majority must find work on their own if they wish to have an income. They are eligible for few social benefits. Those seeking legal residency, of course, must go through a lengthy administrative process. For example, Mexicans who obtain a work visa in the United States have to work. They don’t show up and receive “free” help from government-funded refugee agencies in finding jobs, apartments, and other government freebies. In contrast, all of that is fast-tracked for people labeled “refugees” by the federal government, and most of these refugees are immediately eligible for a wide array of taxpayer-funded benefits. In total, this all costs the taxpayers nearly two billion dollars per year, or $80,000 per refugee per year in the form of federal and state programs including food stamps, child care, and public housing. It’s not enough that you pay for the bombs that create the refugees, dear American taxpayer. You’ll also have to pay to resettle those refugees in your town. https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/youre-paying-for-the-israel-war-youll-also-pay-for-the-refugees
    WWW.SHTFPLAN.COM
    You’re Paying for the Israel War. You’ll Also Pay for the Refugees.
    The United States regime has picked sides in the Israel-Hamas war and has committed to funding Israel's ongoing bombing of non-combatant men, women, and children in the Gaza Strip. Northern Gaza's infrastructure is now all but destroyed, with millions of Gazans displaced and homeless. Nearly ten times more Gazans than Israelis have now died in the conflict. Many Gazans have fled to the southern portion of Gaza, but homelessness and abject poverty await them there.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3821 Visualizações
  • The UN Development Program (UNDP) and the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) said in a joint report released on Thursday that if the Israeli war in Gaza continues for a second month, the poverty rate in Palestine will soar by 34 percent.
    https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Poverty-in-Palestine-to-Sharply-Rise-If-Israeli-War-Continues--UN-20231109-0016.html
    The UN Development Program (UNDP) and the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) said in a joint report released on Thursday that if the Israeli war in Gaza continues for a second month, the poverty rate in Palestine will soar by 34 percent. https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Poverty-in-Palestine-to-Sharply-Rise-If-Israeli-War-Continues--UN-20231109-0016.html
    WWW.TELESURENGLISH.NET
    Poverty in Palestine to Sharply Rise If Israeli War Continues -UN
    Nearly half a million more Palestinians will be pushed into poverty.
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 497 Visualizações
  • Greywarden > As stated on my previous post, the source for this ridiculous Meme is found here: https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1331942-virgin-vs-chad.

    #1. The Chad wants Corporations to be Overthrown.

    Answer: Corporations are State Controlled Socialist Organizations. The Chad seems to be against State controlled monopolies (such as Corporations), which Marx himself was in favor of.

    #2. The Chad does not believe in Hierarchies according to the Marxist author.

    Answer: If this were actually true that the Chad does not believe in hierarchies, then that would mean the Chad is not a Communist, but an Anarcho Capitalist. Anarcho Communism is an Oxymoron as you cannot have Anarchism which is Anti-Government and Communism Which is Pro State Simultaneously. Simply put, the author of this Meme does not know what he is talking about.

    #3. The Chad Covers his face because his actions are all that matters, not his identity according to the Marxist Author.

    Response: Well, we have seen many Obedient Socialist Statist Covering their faces per the orders of the Public Sector State Hierarchy.

    #4. The Chad Believes in the Liberation of Women from oppressive gender roles according to the Marxist author.

    Answer: Oppressive Gender Roles can only play out in an economy that is collectively owned or controlled. Such as male born transgender individuals in women sports ect. This right there classifies as oppressive gender roles, and this is just one example of the Stupidities Marxist are pushing for. Traditional Gender Roles are not at all oppressive. Traditional Gender Roles are actual facts and correlate properly with the individual's gender.

    #5. The Chad comes from poverty and has experienced oppression

    Answer: Not to many victims of oppression come out of poverty by using oppression as an excuse for not being able to come out of oppression. In fact, the fact that the Chad comes out of oppression in the first place is because he isn't even really oppressed. If he were oppressed, and he had no opportunities to grow because of his gender, race or whatever. He would never come out of oppression nor poverty because the system is rigged against him.

    #6. The Chad wants everything Publicized according to the Marxist author.

    Answer: And there you have it ladies and gentlemen. The author just spilled out the beans with the above. If the Chad really is an Anarchist, then he wouldn't want everything publicized as that only empowers the Public Sector Hierarchy. The Marxist said in point #2 of his ridiculous Meme, that the Chad does not believe in Hierarchies. This right here is a contradiction, as Public Sector Control of the means of production is Socialism, and by definition it is Hierarchical, and is completely unrelated to Anarchism.

    #7. The Chad wants money abolished according to the Marxist author.

    Answer: Money's Abolishment is exactly what the Public Sector State Hierarchy wants in order to control the Private Individual. So, the Chad is not exactly against Hierarchies now is he? He is not a real Anarchist, but only one in name i guess.

    #8. The Chad could easily get laid if he wanted to, but chooses to fight Capitalism and Fascism according to the Marxist author.

    Answer: The Chad only fights Capitalism because he is against the individual, and does indeed believe in Hierarchies. This is the Chad's real problem with Capitalism. Fascism is not another word for Capitalism as the Marxist Pseudo Definiton says. Fascism is Syndicalism with a Philosophy of Actualism. Fascism is Trade Unionism and it is a complete opposite of Capitalism.

    #9. I skipped a few of them because I've already addressed similar stupidities.

    On this one the Chad says property is theft.

    Answer: This doesn't make much sense. I do understand if the Marxist is trying to say that Private Property Rights is theft, as the Marxist do believe that the Government should have ownership of all properties, not the individual. So much for not believing in Hierarchies SMH.

    #10. The Chad ignored Bitcoin because its another Capitalist ploy.

    Answer: Good for the Marxist. I am glad the Crypto Market is a Capitalist Market and close to impossible to control. I am glad the Public State Hierarchies of the World cannot control it. I am glad the Crypto Market is an enemy of Socialism, for Socialism is an enemy of the Individual, and individuals do exist and not to be blamed by association for the crimes of another individual just because he/she belongs to the same ethnic group as the criminal.
    Greywarden > As stated on my previous post, the source for this ridiculous Meme is found here: https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1331942-virgin-vs-chad. #1. The Chad wants Corporations to be Overthrown. Answer: Corporations are State Controlled Socialist Organizations. The Chad seems to be against State controlled monopolies (such as Corporations), which Marx himself was in favor of. #2. The Chad does not believe in Hierarchies according to the Marxist author. Answer: If this were actually true that the Chad does not believe in hierarchies, then that would mean the Chad is not a Communist, but an Anarcho Capitalist. Anarcho Communism is an Oxymoron as you cannot have Anarchism which is Anti-Government and Communism Which is Pro State Simultaneously. Simply put, the author of this Meme does not know what he is talking about. #3. The Chad Covers his face because his actions are all that matters, not his identity according to the Marxist Author. Response: Well, we have seen many Obedient Socialist Statist Covering their faces per the orders of the Public Sector State Hierarchy. #4. The Chad Believes in the Liberation of Women from oppressive gender roles according to the Marxist author. Answer: Oppressive Gender Roles can only play out in an economy that is collectively owned or controlled. Such as male born transgender individuals in women sports ect. This right there classifies as oppressive gender roles, and this is just one example of the Stupidities Marxist are pushing for. Traditional Gender Roles are not at all oppressive. Traditional Gender Roles are actual facts and correlate properly with the individual's gender. #5. The Chad comes from poverty and has experienced oppression Answer: Not to many victims of oppression come out of poverty by using oppression as an excuse for not being able to come out of oppression. In fact, the fact that the Chad comes out of oppression in the first place is because he isn't even really oppressed. If he were oppressed, and he had no opportunities to grow because of his gender, race or whatever. He would never come out of oppression nor poverty because the system is rigged against him. #6. The Chad wants everything Publicized according to the Marxist author. Answer: And there you have it ladies and gentlemen. The author just spilled out the beans with the above. If the Chad really is an Anarchist, then he wouldn't want everything publicized as that only empowers the Public Sector Hierarchy. The Marxist said in point #2 of his ridiculous Meme, that the Chad does not believe in Hierarchies. This right here is a contradiction, as Public Sector Control of the means of production is Socialism, and by definition it is Hierarchical, and is completely unrelated to Anarchism. #7. The Chad wants money abolished according to the Marxist author. Answer: Money's Abolishment is exactly what the Public Sector State Hierarchy wants in order to control the Private Individual. So, the Chad is not exactly against Hierarchies now is he? He is not a real Anarchist, but only one in name i guess. #8. The Chad could easily get laid if he wanted to, but chooses to fight Capitalism and Fascism according to the Marxist author. Answer: The Chad only fights Capitalism because he is against the individual, and does indeed believe in Hierarchies. This is the Chad's real problem with Capitalism. Fascism is not another word for Capitalism as the Marxist Pseudo Definiton says. Fascism is Syndicalism with a Philosophy of Actualism. Fascism is Trade Unionism and it is a complete opposite of Capitalism. #9. I skipped a few of them because I've already addressed similar stupidities. On this one the Chad says property is theft. Answer: This doesn't make much sense. I do understand if the Marxist is trying to say that Private Property Rights is theft, as the Marxist do believe that the Government should have ownership of all properties, not the individual. So much for not believing in Hierarchies SMH. #10. The Chad ignored Bitcoin because its another Capitalist ploy. Answer: Good for the Marxist. I am glad the Crypto Market is a Capitalist Market and close to impossible to control. I am glad the Public State Hierarchies of the World cannot control it. I am glad the Crypto Market is an enemy of Socialism, for Socialism is an enemy of the Individual, and individuals do exist and not to be blamed by association for the crimes of another individual just because he/she belongs to the same ethnic group as the criminal.
    Like
    15
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 3499 Visualizações
  • Meanwhile in a parallel world where famine is eradicated, poverty, social injustice, etc, etc????‍♂????????‍♂
    Meanwhile in a parallel world where famine is eradicated, poverty, social injustice, etc, etc????‍♂????????‍♂
    Like
    2
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 552 Visualizações 2
  • Not earning enough money to meet basic needs contributed to around 183,000 deaths in the United States in 2019 alone. An international team working on this project are now dubbing #poverty the “silent killer.”
    Not earning enough money to meet basic needs contributed to around 183,000 deaths in the United States in 2019 alone. An international team working on this project are now dubbing #poverty the “silent killer.”
    WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COM
    Poverty Kills More Americans Than Obesity, Diabetes, and Drug Overdoses, Study Reveals - Activist Post
    Suicides, firearms, homicides, and obesity, diabetes, and drug overdoses, were all less lethal than poverty.
    Like
    2
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 407 Visualizações
  • Another school shooting in the US!!!
    I travelled to the USA a little over a year ago and it was probably the worst country that I have visited TBH.
    The amount of homeless people was just staggering absolutely staggering. The Uber rich minorities living a stones throw away from from absolute poverty indicates a completely broken system.
    80 school shootings in 2023 already is a national tragedy and the powers that be should be ashamed. The US gun laws are the laughing stock of the world. After soooo many school shootings every other country would just outright ban guns, not the US though their answer to the problem is to just arm every single resident
    https://youtu.be/FkHDcdnlXOI
    Another school shooting in the US!!! I travelled to the USA a little over a year ago and it was probably the worst country that I have visited TBH. The amount of homeless people was just staggering absolutely staggering. The Uber rich minorities living a stones throw away from from absolute poverty indicates a completely broken system. 80 school shootings in 2023 already is a national tragedy and the powers that be should be ashamed. The US gun laws are the laughing stock of the world. After soooo many school shootings every other country would just outright ban guns, not the US though their answer to the problem is to just arm every single resident https://youtu.be/FkHDcdnlXOI
    Like
    Sad
    12
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1029 Visualizações
  • I am a great magician and sorcerer))). I predict the future))<br />
    greed breeds poverty<br/>I am a great magician and sorcerer))). I predict the future))
    greed breeds poverty
    I am a great magician and sorcerer))). I predict the future))<br /> greed breeds poverty<br/>I am a great magician and sorcerer))). I predict the future)) greed breeds poverty
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 284 Visualizações
  • Brace Yourself for Bidenflation on Steroids: The Battle of UBI vs Reparations
    Democrats in US cities are implementing Black Panther-inspired guaranteed #income programs or reparations for historic racism. Welfare experts say the programs are too costly for federal funding. Beneficiaries pay for food, utilities, education, and transportation. Naturally, the policies raise #taxes, #inflation, #poverty, and #unemployment. https://youtube.com/shorts/l0NxL0D1pP4 #inflation #biden #someeofficial #cent #sme #vyb #oneup #hbit #leo #leofinance
    Brace Yourself for Bidenflation on Steroids: The Battle of UBI vs Reparations Democrats in US cities are implementing Black Panther-inspired guaranteed #income programs or reparations for historic racism. Welfare experts say the programs are too costly for federal funding. Beneficiaries pay for food, utilities, education, and transportation. Naturally, the policies raise #taxes, #inflation, #poverty, and #unemployment. https://youtube.com/shorts/l0NxL0D1pP4 #inflation #biden #someeofficial #cent #sme #vyb #oneup #hbit #leo #leofinance
    Like
    5
    0 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 2335 Visualizações
  • John Lennon's famous widow: Yoko Ono celebrates her 90th birthday today

    Yoko Ono, Japan's "most famous unknown" multimedia artist, singer, writer and peace activist celebrates her 90th birthday today.
    She was marked by a love affair with John Lennon, one of the Beatles, so today she is one of the most famous and richest women in the world. According to the media, her fortune is 750 million dollars
    Yoko Ono was born on this day, February 18, 1933, in Tokyo, Japan, in a rich Japanese "blue blood" family. As a 12-year-old, she survived the devastating American bombing of the Japanese capital and the subsequent post-war poverty.
    When The Beatles broke up in 1970, Yoko was often cited as the main reason for their split. However, according to statements close to the band, and Paul McCartney himself, it seems that Yoko could not have been the reason for their breakup.
    Apart from music, Yoko was always involved in art. She continued to exhibit her work. In 2015, the Museum of Modern Art in New York organized an exhibition of her earlier works. She also received the Golden Lion for lifetime achievement at the Venice Biennale in 2009.
    John Lennon's famous widow: Yoko Ono celebrates her 90th birthday today Yoko Ono, Japan's "most famous unknown" multimedia artist, singer, writer and peace activist celebrates her 90th birthday today. She was marked by a love affair with John Lennon, one of the Beatles, so today she is one of the most famous and richest women in the world. According to the media, her fortune is 750 million dollars Yoko Ono was born on this day, February 18, 1933, in Tokyo, Japan, in a rich Japanese "blue blood" family. As a 12-year-old, she survived the devastating American bombing of the Japanese capital and the subsequent post-war poverty. When The Beatles broke up in 1970, Yoko was often cited as the main reason for their split. However, according to statements close to the band, and Paul McCartney himself, it seems that Yoko could not have been the reason for their breakup. Apart from music, Yoko was always involved in art. She continued to exhibit her work. In 2015, the Museum of Modern Art in New York organized an exhibition of her earlier works. She also received the Golden Lion for lifetime achievement at the Venice Biennale in 2009.
    Like
    11
    1 Comentários 0 Compartilhamentos 1959 Visualizações