• **Earn $10 to $20 Per Hour: The Ultimate Guide to Home-Based Jobs**

    Apply now https://shorturl.at/3tTv3
    In today’s world, finding a flexible job that allows you to work from home is more feasible than ever. Whether you're looking to supplement your income or find a full-time role that fits around your lifestyle, there are plenty of opportunities out there offering $10 to $20 per hour. Here’s a comprehensive guide to some of the best options available right now.

    ### 1. **Freelance Writing and Editing**

    **What It Involves:** Writing articles, blogs, copy, or editing content for various clients.

    **Why It’s Great:** If you have a knack for words and grammar, freelance writing or editing can be a lucrative option. Platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, and Freelancer connect writers with clients in need of content. Many writers start at around $10 per hour, but experienced professionals can easily earn $20 or more.

    **Getting Started:** Create a portfolio of your work, sign up on freelancing platforms, and start bidding on projects. Networking in online writing communities can also help you find clients.

    ### 2. **Virtual Assistance**

    **What It Involves:** Managing emails, scheduling, data entry, and various administrative tasks for businesses or entrepreneurs.

    **Why It’s Great:** Virtual assistants provide crucial support to businesses and can work on a flexible schedule. Rates typically start at $15 per hour and can go up depending on the complexity of the tasks and your level of experience.

    **Getting Started:** Platforms like Belay and Time Etc. are great places to find virtual assistant jobs. You can also network on LinkedIn or consider starting your own VA business.

    ### 3. **Online Tutoring**

    **What It Involves:** Teaching or tutoring students in subjects ranging from math and science to languages and test preparation.

    **Why It’s Great:** Online tutoring offers flexibility and allows you to use your expertise to help others. Pay rates typically range from $15 to $25 per hour, depending on your qualifications and the subject matter.

    **Getting Started:** Sign up on tutoring platforms like VIPKid, Tutor.com, or Wyzant. You might need to provide proof of qualifications or pass a screening process.

    ### 4. **Customer Service Representative**

    **What It Involves:** Assisting customers via phone, chat, or email for various companies.

    **Why It’s Great:** Many companies offer remote customer service positions with flexible hours. Pay ranges from $12 to $20 per hour, depending on the company and your experience level.

    **Getting Started:** Look for remote customer service jobs on websites like Indeed, Glassdoor, and Remote.co. Companies like Amazon, Apple, and Concentrix often have remote positions available.

    ### 5. **Data Entry and Transcription**

    **What It Involves:** Entering data into spreadsheets or databases, or transcribing audio recordings into text.

    **Why It’s Great:** These roles often require minimal training and can be done at your own pace. Rates usually start at $10 per hour, but with experience, you could earn up to $20 per hour or more.

    **Getting Started:** Check out platforms like Rev, TranscribeMe, and Clickworker for transcription and data entry jobs. You can also find opportunities on freelance job boards.

    ### 6. **Social Media Management**

    **What It Involves:** Managing and creating content for social media profiles, engaging with followers, and analyzing performance.

    **Why It’s Great:** Businesses of all sizes need help with their social media presence. If you have experience with social media platforms and marketing, this role can be quite rewarding, with pay ranging from $15 to $30 per hour.

    **Getting Started:** Build a portfolio of your work, and start reaching out to businesses or sign up on freelance platforms. Networking in digital marketing communities can also open doors.

    ### 7. **Online Selling**

    **What It Involves:** Selling products or crafts through platforms like Etsy, eBay, or Amazon.

    **Why It’s Great:** If you have a hobby or skill like crafting or vintage hunting, turning it into a side business can be profitable. Earnings can vary widely but expect to make around $10 to $20 per hour if you’re selling consistently.

    **Getting Started:** Set up your online store, take high-quality photos of your products, and start marketing through social media and online ads.

    ### Conclusion

    Whether you’re looking for a part-time gig or a full-time career, there’s a home-based job out there that fits your skills and interests. With a little research and effort, you can start earning $10 to $20 per hour from the comfort of your own home. Dive in, explore your options, and take control of your career path today!

    Feel free to share your experiences or ask any questions in the comments below. Good luck with your job search!
    #job #usajob #parttimejob #workfromhome #makemoney
    **Earn $10 to $20 Per Hour: The Ultimate Guide to Home-Based Jobs** Apply now👉👉👉 https://shorturl.at/3tTv3 In today’s world, finding a flexible job that allows you to work from home is more feasible than ever. Whether you're looking to supplement your income or find a full-time role that fits around your lifestyle, there are plenty of opportunities out there offering $10 to $20 per hour. Here’s a comprehensive guide to some of the best options available right now. ### 1. **Freelance Writing and Editing** **What It Involves:** Writing articles, blogs, copy, or editing content for various clients. **Why It’s Great:** If you have a knack for words and grammar, freelance writing or editing can be a lucrative option. Platforms like Upwork, Fiverr, and Freelancer connect writers with clients in need of content. Many writers start at around $10 per hour, but experienced professionals can easily earn $20 or more. **Getting Started:** Create a portfolio of your work, sign up on freelancing platforms, and start bidding on projects. Networking in online writing communities can also help you find clients. ### 2. **Virtual Assistance** **What It Involves:** Managing emails, scheduling, data entry, and various administrative tasks for businesses or entrepreneurs. **Why It’s Great:** Virtual assistants provide crucial support to businesses and can work on a flexible schedule. Rates typically start at $15 per hour and can go up depending on the complexity of the tasks and your level of experience. **Getting Started:** Platforms like Belay and Time Etc. are great places to find virtual assistant jobs. You can also network on LinkedIn or consider starting your own VA business. ### 3. **Online Tutoring** **What It Involves:** Teaching or tutoring students in subjects ranging from math and science to languages and test preparation. **Why It’s Great:** Online tutoring offers flexibility and allows you to use your expertise to help others. Pay rates typically range from $15 to $25 per hour, depending on your qualifications and the subject matter. **Getting Started:** Sign up on tutoring platforms like VIPKid, Tutor.com, or Wyzant. You might need to provide proof of qualifications or pass a screening process. ### 4. **Customer Service Representative** **What It Involves:** Assisting customers via phone, chat, or email for various companies. **Why It’s Great:** Many companies offer remote customer service positions with flexible hours. Pay ranges from $12 to $20 per hour, depending on the company and your experience level. **Getting Started:** Look for remote customer service jobs on websites like Indeed, Glassdoor, and Remote.co. Companies like Amazon, Apple, and Concentrix often have remote positions available. ### 5. **Data Entry and Transcription** **What It Involves:** Entering data into spreadsheets or databases, or transcribing audio recordings into text. **Why It’s Great:** These roles often require minimal training and can be done at your own pace. Rates usually start at $10 per hour, but with experience, you could earn up to $20 per hour or more. **Getting Started:** Check out platforms like Rev, TranscribeMe, and Clickworker for transcription and data entry jobs. You can also find opportunities on freelance job boards. ### 6. **Social Media Management** **What It Involves:** Managing and creating content for social media profiles, engaging with followers, and analyzing performance. **Why It’s Great:** Businesses of all sizes need help with their social media presence. If you have experience with social media platforms and marketing, this role can be quite rewarding, with pay ranging from $15 to $30 per hour. **Getting Started:** Build a portfolio of your work, and start reaching out to businesses or sign up on freelance platforms. Networking in digital marketing communities can also open doors. ### 7. **Online Selling** **What It Involves:** Selling products or crafts through platforms like Etsy, eBay, or Amazon. **Why It’s Great:** If you have a hobby or skill like crafting or vintage hunting, turning it into a side business can be profitable. Earnings can vary widely but expect to make around $10 to $20 per hour if you’re selling consistently. **Getting Started:** Set up your online store, take high-quality photos of your products, and start marketing through social media and online ads. ### Conclusion Whether you’re looking for a part-time gig or a full-time career, there’s a home-based job out there that fits your skills and interests. With a little research and effort, you can start earning $10 to $20 per hour from the comfort of your own home. Dive in, explore your options, and take control of your career path today! Feel free to share your experiences or ask any questions in the comments below. Good luck with your job search! #job #usajob #parttimejob #workfromhome #makemoney
    Love
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 469 Views
  • Big pharma corrupted medicine, I don’t trust it anymore
    GUEST POST: by Julie Sladden, MD

    Maryanne Demasi, PhD

    Julie Sladden, doctor (retired) and writer, made the difficult decision in 2021 to decline the covid-19 vaccine and close her medical practice. Julie now works in politics, as a local government councillor and political adviser.


    It was one of those conversations you never forget. We were discussing – of all things – the Covid injections, and I was questioning the early ‘safe and effective’ claims put forward by the pharmaceutical industry.

    I felt suspicious of how quickly we had arrived at that point of seeming consensus despite a lack of long-term safety data. I do not trust the pharmaceutical industry. My colleague did not agree, and I felt my eyes widen as he said, “I don’t think they would do anything dodgy.” Clearly, my colleague had not read the medical history books. This conversation slapped me out of my own ignorance that Big Pharma’s rap sheet was well-known in the profession. It isn't.

    With this in mind, let’s take a look at the history of illegal and fraudulent dealings by players in the pharmaceutical industry; an industry that has way more power and influence than we give them credit for.

    Before I continue, a word (not from our sponsor). There are many people working in this industry who have good intentions towards improving healthcare for patients, dedicating their lives to finding a cure or treatment for disease. Some therapeutic pharmaceuticals are truly lifesaving. I probably wouldn’t be here today were it not for a couple of lifesaving drugs (that’s a story for another time). But we must be very clear in our understanding. The pharmaceutical industry, as a whole and by its nature, is conflicted and significantly driven by the mighty dollar, rather than altruism.

    There are many players and different games being played by the industry. We ignore these at our peril. The rap sheet of illegal activities is alarming. It seems that barely a month goes by without some pharmaceutical company in court, somewhere. Criminal convictions are common and fines tally into the billions. Civil cases, with their million-dollar settlements, are abundant too.

    A 2020 peer-reviewed article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association outlines the extent of the problem. The group studied both the type of illegal activity and financial penalties imposed on pharma companies between the years 2003 and 2016. Of the companies studied, 85 per cent (22 of 26) had received financial penalties for illegal activities with a total combined dollar value of $US33 billion. The illegal activities included manufacturing and distributing adulterated drugs, misleading marketing, failure to disclose negative information about a product (ie significant side effects including death), bribery to foreign officials, fraudulently delaying market entry of competitors, pricing and financial violations, and kickbacks.

    When expressed as a percentage of revenue, the highest penalties were awarded to Schering-Plough, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Allergan, and Wyeth. The biggest overall fines have been paid by GSK (almost $US10 billion), Pfizer ($US2.9 billion), Johnson & Johnson ($US2.6 billion), and other familiar names include: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Eli Lilly, Schering-Plough, Sanofi Aventis, and Wyeth. It's quite a list, and many of the Big Pharma players are repeat offenders.

    Prosecuting these companies is no mean feat. Cases often drag for years, making the avenue of justice and resolution inaccessible to all but the well-funded, persistent, and steadfast. If a case is won, pharma’s usual response is to appeal to a higher court and start the process again. One thing is clear, taking these giants to court requires nerves of steel, a willingness to surrender years of life to the task, and very deep pockets.

    For every conviction, there are countless settlements, the company agreeing to payout, but making no admission of guilt. A notable example being the $US35 million settlement made, after 15 years of legal manoeuvring, by Pfizer in a Nigerian case that alleged the company had experimented on 200 children without their parent’s knowledge or consent.

    Reading through the case reports, the pattern of behaviour is reminiscent of the movie ‘Ground Hog Day’ with the same games being played by different companies as if they are following some kind of unwritten playbook.

    Occasionally there is a case that lifts the lid on these playbook strategies, revealing the influence of the pharma industry and the lengths they are willing to go to, to turn a profit. The Australian Federal Court case Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, involving the manufacturer of the drug Vioxx, is a perfect example.

    By way of background, Vioxx (the anti-arthritis drug Rofecoxib) was alleged to have caused an increased risk of cardiovascular conditions including heart attack and stroke. It was launched in 1999 and, at peak popularity, was used by up to 80 million people worldwide, marketed as a safer alternative to traditional anti-inflammatory drugs with their troublesome gastrointestinal side effects. In Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, the applicant – Graeme Robert Peterson - alleged the drug had caused the heart attack he suffered in 2003, leaving him significantly incapacitated. Peterson argued the Merck companies were negligent in not having withdrawn the drug from the market earlier than they did in 2004 and, by not warning of the risks and making promotional representations to doctors, were guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct under the Commonwealth Trade Practices Act 1974.

    In November 2004 Dr David Graham, then Associate Director for Science and Medicine in FDA’s Office of Drug Safety provided powerful testimony to the US Senate regarding Vioxx. According to Graham, prior to the approval of the drug, a Merck-funded study showed a seven-fold increase in heart attacks. Despite this, the drug was approved by regulatory agencies, including the FDA and the TGA. This finding was later supported by another Merck-funded study, VIGOR - which showed a five-fold increase, the results of which were published in the high-impact New England Journal of Medicine. It was later revealed by subpoena during litigation, that three heart attacks were not included in the original data submitted to the journal, a fact that at least two of the authors knew at the time. This resulted in a 'misleading conclusion’ regarding the risk of heart attack associated with the drug.

    By the time Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and associated class action involving 1660 people, was heard in Australia in 2009, the international parent of MSD, Merck, had already paid $US4.83 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits in the US over adverse effects of Vioxx. Predictably, Merck made no admission of guilt. The Australian legal battle was a long, drawn-out affair, taking several years with more twists and turns than a cheap garden hose (you can read more about it here and here). Long story short, a March 2010 Federal Court finding in favour of Peterson in was later overturned by a full bench of the Federal Court in Oct 2011. In 2013, a settlement was reached with class action participants which resulted in a mere maximum payment of $4629.36 per claimant. MSD generously waived their claim for legal costs against Peterson.

    What's notable in this battle was the headline-grabbing courtroom evidence detailing the extent of alleged pharmaceutical misdeeds in marketing the drug. The pharma giant went to the lengths of producing sponsored journals with renowned scientific publisher Elsevier, including a publication called The Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine. These fake ‘journals’ were made to look like independent scientific journals, but contained articles attributed to doctors that were ghostwritten by Merck employees. Some doctors listed as honorary Journal board members said they had no idea they were listed in the journal and had never been given any articles to review.

    But wait, there’s more.

    The trove of internal emails presented in evidence revealed a more sinister level of operation. One of the emails circulated at the pharma giant’s US headquarters contained a list of ‘problem physicians’ which the company sought to ‘neutralise’ or ‘discredit.’ The recommendations to achieve these ends included payment for presentations, research and education, financial support of private practice, and 'strong recommendation(s) to discredit.' Such was the extent of intimidation, one professor wrote to the head of Merck to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers critical of the drug. The court heard how Merck had been ‘systematically playing down the side effects of Vioxx’ and their behaviour ‘seriously impinge(d) on academic freedom.’ This alleged systematic intimidation was extensive as it was effective. Result? Merck made over $US2 billion per year in sales before Vioxx was finally pulled from pharmacy shelves in 2004. In his testimony, Dr David Graham estimated that between 88,000 and 139,000 excess cases of heart attack or sudden cardiac death were caused by Vioxx in the US alone before it was withdrawn.

    These systems of influence, manipulation and tactics were largely operative when Covid arrived. Add to that the ‘warp speed’ development of novel ‘vaccines’, government green lights, pharmaceutical indemnity and confidential contracts. Now you have the makings of a pharmaceutical pay day the likes of which we have never seen before.

    It should come as no surprise then, the recent announcement that five US states – Texas, Kansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Utah – are taking Pfizer to court for withholding information, and misleading and deceiving the public through statements made in marketing its Covid-19 injection. That these cases are filed as civil suits under consumer protection laws is likely to be just the tip of the pharmaceutical playbook iceberg. No doubt the discovery process will hold further lessons for us all.


    Share

    https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/big-pharma-corrupted-medicine-i-dont
    Big pharma corrupted medicine, I don’t trust it anymore GUEST POST: by Julie Sladden, MD Maryanne Demasi, PhD Julie Sladden, doctor (retired) and writer, made the difficult decision in 2021 to decline the covid-19 vaccine and close her medical practice. Julie now works in politics, as a local government councillor and political adviser. It was one of those conversations you never forget. We were discussing – of all things – the Covid injections, and I was questioning the early ‘safe and effective’ claims put forward by the pharmaceutical industry. I felt suspicious of how quickly we had arrived at that point of seeming consensus despite a lack of long-term safety data. I do not trust the pharmaceutical industry. My colleague did not agree, and I felt my eyes widen as he said, “I don’t think they would do anything dodgy.” Clearly, my colleague had not read the medical history books. This conversation slapped me out of my own ignorance that Big Pharma’s rap sheet was well-known in the profession. It isn't. With this in mind, let’s take a look at the history of illegal and fraudulent dealings by players in the pharmaceutical industry; an industry that has way more power and influence than we give them credit for. Before I continue, a word (not from our sponsor). There are many people working in this industry who have good intentions towards improving healthcare for patients, dedicating their lives to finding a cure or treatment for disease. Some therapeutic pharmaceuticals are truly lifesaving. I probably wouldn’t be here today were it not for a couple of lifesaving drugs (that’s a story for another time). But we must be very clear in our understanding. The pharmaceutical industry, as a whole and by its nature, is conflicted and significantly driven by the mighty dollar, rather than altruism. There are many players and different games being played by the industry. We ignore these at our peril. The rap sheet of illegal activities is alarming. It seems that barely a month goes by without some pharmaceutical company in court, somewhere. Criminal convictions are common and fines tally into the billions. Civil cases, with their million-dollar settlements, are abundant too. A 2020 peer-reviewed article published in the Journal of the American Medical Association outlines the extent of the problem. The group studied both the type of illegal activity and financial penalties imposed on pharma companies between the years 2003 and 2016. Of the companies studied, 85 per cent (22 of 26) had received financial penalties for illegal activities with a total combined dollar value of $US33 billion. The illegal activities included manufacturing and distributing adulterated drugs, misleading marketing, failure to disclose negative information about a product (ie significant side effects including death), bribery to foreign officials, fraudulently delaying market entry of competitors, pricing and financial violations, and kickbacks. When expressed as a percentage of revenue, the highest penalties were awarded to Schering-Plough, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Allergan, and Wyeth. The biggest overall fines have been paid by GSK (almost $US10 billion), Pfizer ($US2.9 billion), Johnson & Johnson ($US2.6 billion), and other familiar names include: AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck, Eli Lilly, Schering-Plough, Sanofi Aventis, and Wyeth. It's quite a list, and many of the Big Pharma players are repeat offenders. Prosecuting these companies is no mean feat. Cases often drag for years, making the avenue of justice and resolution inaccessible to all but the well-funded, persistent, and steadfast. If a case is won, pharma’s usual response is to appeal to a higher court and start the process again. One thing is clear, taking these giants to court requires nerves of steel, a willingness to surrender years of life to the task, and very deep pockets. For every conviction, there are countless settlements, the company agreeing to payout, but making no admission of guilt. A notable example being the $US35 million settlement made, after 15 years of legal manoeuvring, by Pfizer in a Nigerian case that alleged the company had experimented on 200 children without their parent’s knowledge or consent. Reading through the case reports, the pattern of behaviour is reminiscent of the movie ‘Ground Hog Day’ with the same games being played by different companies as if they are following some kind of unwritten playbook. Occasionally there is a case that lifts the lid on these playbook strategies, revealing the influence of the pharma industry and the lengths they are willing to go to, to turn a profit. The Australian Federal Court case Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, involving the manufacturer of the drug Vioxx, is a perfect example. By way of background, Vioxx (the anti-arthritis drug Rofecoxib) was alleged to have caused an increased risk of cardiovascular conditions including heart attack and stroke. It was launched in 1999 and, at peak popularity, was used by up to 80 million people worldwide, marketed as a safer alternative to traditional anti-inflammatory drugs with their troublesome gastrointestinal side effects. In Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, the applicant – Graeme Robert Peterson - alleged the drug had caused the heart attack he suffered in 2003, leaving him significantly incapacitated. Peterson argued the Merck companies were negligent in not having withdrawn the drug from the market earlier than they did in 2004 and, by not warning of the risks and making promotional representations to doctors, were guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct under the Commonwealth Trade Practices Act 1974. In November 2004 Dr David Graham, then Associate Director for Science and Medicine in FDA’s Office of Drug Safety provided powerful testimony to the US Senate regarding Vioxx. According to Graham, prior to the approval of the drug, a Merck-funded study showed a seven-fold increase in heart attacks. Despite this, the drug was approved by regulatory agencies, including the FDA and the TGA. This finding was later supported by another Merck-funded study, VIGOR - which showed a five-fold increase, the results of which were published in the high-impact New England Journal of Medicine. It was later revealed by subpoena during litigation, that three heart attacks were not included in the original data submitted to the journal, a fact that at least two of the authors knew at the time. This resulted in a 'misleading conclusion’ regarding the risk of heart attack associated with the drug. By the time Peterson v Merck Sharpe and Dohme, and associated class action involving 1660 people, was heard in Australia in 2009, the international parent of MSD, Merck, had already paid $US4.83 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits in the US over adverse effects of Vioxx. Predictably, Merck made no admission of guilt. The Australian legal battle was a long, drawn-out affair, taking several years with more twists and turns than a cheap garden hose (you can read more about it here and here). Long story short, a March 2010 Federal Court finding in favour of Peterson in was later overturned by a full bench of the Federal Court in Oct 2011. In 2013, a settlement was reached with class action participants which resulted in a mere maximum payment of $4629.36 per claimant. MSD generously waived their claim for legal costs against Peterson. What's notable in this battle was the headline-grabbing courtroom evidence detailing the extent of alleged pharmaceutical misdeeds in marketing the drug. The pharma giant went to the lengths of producing sponsored journals with renowned scientific publisher Elsevier, including a publication called The Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine. These fake ‘journals’ were made to look like independent scientific journals, but contained articles attributed to doctors that were ghostwritten by Merck employees. Some doctors listed as honorary Journal board members said they had no idea they were listed in the journal and had never been given any articles to review. But wait, there’s more. The trove of internal emails presented in evidence revealed a more sinister level of operation. One of the emails circulated at the pharma giant’s US headquarters contained a list of ‘problem physicians’ which the company sought to ‘neutralise’ or ‘discredit.’ The recommendations to achieve these ends included payment for presentations, research and education, financial support of private practice, and 'strong recommendation(s) to discredit.' Such was the extent of intimidation, one professor wrote to the head of Merck to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers critical of the drug. The court heard how Merck had been ‘systematically playing down the side effects of Vioxx’ and their behaviour ‘seriously impinge(d) on academic freedom.’ This alleged systematic intimidation was extensive as it was effective. Result? Merck made over $US2 billion per year in sales before Vioxx was finally pulled from pharmacy shelves in 2004. In his testimony, Dr David Graham estimated that between 88,000 and 139,000 excess cases of heart attack or sudden cardiac death were caused by Vioxx in the US alone before it was withdrawn. These systems of influence, manipulation and tactics were largely operative when Covid arrived. Add to that the ‘warp speed’ development of novel ‘vaccines’, government green lights, pharmaceutical indemnity and confidential contracts. Now you have the makings of a pharmaceutical pay day the likes of which we have never seen before. It should come as no surprise then, the recent announcement that five US states – Texas, Kansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Utah – are taking Pfizer to court for withholding information, and misleading and deceiving the public through statements made in marketing its Covid-19 injection. That these cases are filed as civil suits under consumer protection laws is likely to be just the tip of the pharmaceutical playbook iceberg. No doubt the discovery process will hold further lessons for us all. Share https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/big-pharma-corrupted-medicine-i-dont
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1893 Views
  • The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common?
    This article is too long for email. Please read in Substack app.

    Remember this quote? Credit Sage Hana:


    The 2nd shot, 21 days apart. Why the 2nd shot and why 21 days, exactly? Let’s take a look.

    The anaphylaxis research history.

    Charles Richet


    Charles Robert Richet (25 August 1850 – 4 December 1935) was a French physiologist at the Collège de France and immunology pioneer. In 1913, he won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine "in recognition of his work on anaphylaxis". Richet devoted many years to the study of paranormal and spiritualist phenomena, coining the term "ectoplasm". He believed in the inferiority of black people, was a proponent of eugenics, and presided over the French Eugenics Society towards the end of his life.

    I would like to acknowledge that I knew not much about anaphylaxis other than it is a dangerous, life threatening allergic reaction. I witnessed it in a local grocery store pharmacy that administered covid vaccines. A young apparently healthy man (in his 30s) dropped on the floor immediately after the injection and was lying there when I walked in. Everyone was behaving like it wasn’t a big deal. I wanted to be let off this planet.

    While working on this article, I ran a quick CDC VAERS query. All vaccines for all time in VAERS (about 30 years) produced 12,200+ anaphylactic reactions and 2200+ shocks. Covid-19 vaccines produced 9,000+ anaphylactic reactions and 1000+ anaphylactic shocks. mRNA injections are responsible for 11k of the total 12k reported anaphylactic reactions. However, that’s not the entire story of anaphylaxis.

    Katherine Watt pointed me to Charles Richet’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech and to a couple of articles by this author (Northern Tracey). I suggest you read them. The author was way ahead of all of us on this topic.

    Katherine published on our email exchange at the time:

    Intentional elusivity of definitions for virus and vaccine.

    Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law…

    Read more

    12 days ago · 146 likes · Katherine Watt

    As I mentioned in my email exchange with Katherine, Richet’s own work clearly referred to the poison he made from tentacles of Actinaria (sea anemone) as the “virus of Actinaria”. This confirmed one more time what we already knew: viruses are not some sort of natural “seeds” of disease, randomly flying around and jumping strangers. They are poisons - either natural toxins excreted by plants, bacteria and animals, or poisons made by people like Richet and now CDC/pharma. They do not transmit by air or casual contact.

    What becomes apparent from reviewing Richet’s 100+ year old research - the only thing you really need to worry about with respect to “viruses/poisons” is an injection of biologics (proteins) for the 2nd time within the anaphylaxis window that starts typically after 20 days and lasting anywhere from months to years to the lifetime. This can happen in nature from the 2nd bite of an animal/insect carrying same biological toxin (a very low probability event nowadays), or from what is now forced by the government policy - from the needle wielded by a brainless money whore masquerading as a healthcare provider who is doing it for the 90th time in your or your child’s life “because science”.

    The original biologics regulation law in 1902 was called the virus-toxin act. Early on, virus, toxin, antitoxin, serum and vaccine were used interchangeably, because the vaccinators knew what they were propagating in the labs and licensed establishments - biological poisons.

    This lead me to become intensely interested in Richet’s work. I found his book describing the work on anaphylaxis published in 1913. I am including several screenshots from it, so you can read for yourself.

    Richet alluded to vaccination being a failure from the first attempts, because, instead of producing expected immunity it produced violent reactions or even death from minute (not considered dangerous) amounts of the toxin at the 2nd exposure. This happened in a random % of the population. One example quoted anaphylaxis rates from injecting cattle with anthrax serum: approximately 10% became violently ill and many died. The population who would react anaphylactically is a-priory not distinguishable from others, because it is not known who is already sensitized to which biological substances.


    This is still the case. There is no way to determine upfront who will be anaphylactically sensitized by an injection of a biologic (a protein). The establishment healthcare denies this, proclaiming all vaccines “very safe”. This is categorically not true, as becomes very apparent once you read Richet’s work related to injecting biological substances, even benign ones like milk or albumins (derived from wheat and other cereals). Digesting a protein and injecting it directly into the blood stream are two entirely different things! For example, it is safe to ingest snake venom for most people (provided no sores or abrasions in the mouth). I am not advising you try this, but sucking the venom out immediately post bite has been used as a bush medicine method. However, a snake bite delivering the same venom directly into the blood stream is an entirely different story.

    You notice that Richet talks about the “second injection”. This refers to the nature of anaphylaxis: the first interaction with an injected toxin may be not even noticed, be well tolerated or may be at worst mildly irritating. After a period of 2-3 weeks, the second exposure, however, may become very dangerous or fatal. The second exposure in most of Richet’s experiments was by injection. However, with high enough sensitization by the first injection, the anaphylaxis could also result from environmental exposure or ingestion, depending on the degree of sensitization to the “allergen”, or “toxigen” as he termed it. Do you understand peanut allergy, gluten allergy, soy allergy, etc. now? The things that didn’t exist before peanut oil, wheat albumins and other common food proteins became widely used in vaccines (and were proclaimed “generally safe” because it’s just food).

    Importantly, Richet has demonstrated that anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock and the variety of allergic reactions are all the same phenomenon, stemming from the same thing - a sensitizing exposure by proteins reaching the blood stream and bypassing normal digestion.

    Richet provided principles of anaphylaxis in his book:



    He also summarized findings from other researchers working on anaphylaxis at the time. Notice especially points 8 and 10 - this describes anaphylaxis from “vaccination” and subsequent allergic reactions, even to non-proteins (crystalloids):





    Richet found that the state of anaphylaxis sets in after a period of 2-3 weeks (it can vary), and depending on the initial toxin/protein, the sensitization state may last from weeks to years, and possibly be permanent. At the time that he wrote the book, he mentioned that in people anaphylactic/allergenic state was observed up to 6 years, but it may be permanent. Do you see now, why most vaccines are delivered in at least 2 doses, and they are separated by at least 21 days? They want to see if they induce severe anaphylaxis (i.e. life threatening kind). Here’s Pfizer’s “postmarketing experience” document, compiling adverse events as of Feb 2021 (first 2 months of vaccine rollout):


    This table is is not all cases of anaphylaxis, of course, but only the most severe form - the shock.

    Anaphylaxis is all allergic reactions and autoimmune disease, but these things are very easy to deny as they take a while to manifest and are not immediately deadly. The industry has developed perfect gaslighting strategies: “genetic mutations”, “toxic food”, “stress”, “novel syndromes”, and even better - glorification of chronic illness via movies, advertising, non-profits and other economic activity feeding off vaccine-induced destruction of natural health. In case of mRNA vaccines, they absolutely knew that they are killing people with anaphylaxis, but since that was the goal of the military weapon, the shots have not been removed and continue being pushed on the public.

    Another interesting observation made by Richet is that white mice and some of the breeds of rats do not experience anaphylaxis. No wonder these animals are now the staple of pharmaceutical research!

    While Richet himself seemed to be very much pro-vaccination, his main conclusions about anaphylaxis speak soundly against it. It is impossible to design a safe vaccine, because it is impossible to predict anaphylactic reactions. Each individual is unique, a product of heredity and interactions with environment. Introduction of foreign, non-self proteins is an assault on this natural equilibrium and can only result in a disaster.


    That vaccination in people induces anaphylaxis was known early on:


    And was given the name “allergy”, possibly to hide the fact that it’s vaccine-induced anaphylaxis:


    These psychos would even kill themselves, and still not get the message:


    Substances that induce anaphylaxis - colloids.

    Difference between Crystalloids and Colloids
    Colloids vs crystalloids

    Colloids and crystalloids are two types of fluid solutions used for intravenous (IV) infusion in medicine. The primary distinction between them lies in their particle size, composition, and behavior in the body.

    Colloids

    Consist of large particles (0.5-100 nm) that do not pass through semi-permeable membranes, such as capillary walls

    Examples: gelatin, albumin, hetastarch, dextran

    Act as plasma volume expanders, maintaining blood volume and pressure

    Have a high oncotic pressure, which helps to draw fluid into the vascular compartment

    May cause anaphylaxis in some patients

    More expensive than crystalloids

    Suitable for patients with severe fluid loss, trauma, burns, or sepsis

    Crystalloids

    Consist of small particles (less than 0.5 nm) that can pass through semi-permeable membranes

    Examples: normal saline (0.9% NaCl), lactated Ringer’s solution, 5% dextrose in water

    Act as isotonic or hypertonic solutions, expanding extracellular fluid volume

    Have a lower oncotic pressure, which can lead to fluid accumulation in tissues

    Less likely to cause anaphylaxis

    Generally less expensive than colloids

    Suitable for patients with mild to moderate fluid loss, dehydration, or electrolyte imbalance

    In general, small molecule drugs do not cause anaphylaxis.

    Vaccines are, of course, colloids as they contain a mixture of proteins and lipids in suspension.

    Properly matched blood transfusions do not generally produce anaphylaxis. However, since all blood banks are now contaminated with mRNA-injected blood, it is not possible to say that they are safe. I personally would not accept blood, except from a known donor.

    Richet proposed that a “toxigen” which developed after the initial sensitizing injection in the blood was responsible for subsequent state of anaphylaxis:


    “Infectious disease” explained by anaphylaxis:

    The phenomenon of anaphylaxis may help explain both, the natural outbreaks of what appears as “contagious illness” in human history and the skyrocketing chronic illness in the modern western populations. It is known that the bacteria implicated in diseases like cholera or the plague are commonly present in the intestinal tracts of many people and do not seem to cause any issues. Then, how does an epidemic of the plague or cholera occur? Imagine living in a crowded, rapidly growing European city around 15th - 17th century:


    This is one of the main streets in Amsterdam, with raw sewage flowing in the middle, domestic animals sharing lower floors of the buildings, no plumbing, sanitation or refrigeration of food. The rats are very common. They bite and the bites carry common proteins found in that area’s sewage. Once enough people in the same area have been bitten for the first time, some weeks go by, anaphylactic state develops, and then the rats bite some of the same people again. If enough of these events occur, an “epidemic” of the plague/smallpox/cholera starts in this community.

    Hygiene, plumbing, water sanitation, refrigeration and air conditioning were the most significant technological innovations that defeated epidemics by removing the chances of injection of anaphylactizing toxigens by common pests. So, instead, we now have the establishment “healthcare” assaulting the society like the medieval sewer rats with poisoned needles. All vaccines contain two main sources of injury - the proteins that are used to formulate them, including the toxins (“viruses”) and the vehicle which frequently contains other common proteins like albumins (gluten allergy), egg proteins, soy, corn, casein (milk intolerance), etc. There are also “contaminants” and “adjuvants” such as toxic metals, and more recently with introduction recombinant vaccines - DNA plasmids that transfect cells. The mRNA shots are even worse as they contain numerous toxic vectors. Now imagine a baby getting 70+ different shots, most in several doses. It is guaranteed that the baby will get anaphylactized to many commonly encountered proteins, and that a chronic inflammation/allergy will result. Anaphylaxis, being an intestinal reaction, is also tied to destruction of microbiome, which I will address in later articles. Practically all chronic conditions, especially in children, can be tied back to vaccine-induced anaphylaxis.

    Many people state that food that we eat and the environment are full of toxins. While this may be true, especially for some locations and some socioeconomic groups, the food and environmental toxicity pales in comparison to what happens when the toxins, especially proteins are injected directly into the blood stream. I am in full support of improving the quality of food and cleaning up the environmental pollution, but if we need a policy to combat the chronic disease epidemic, there is one straightforward answer that all politicians and most experts today soundly ignore - the catastrophic damage to health induced by vaccines.

    I would like to end with the quote from Richet:

    Richet: "We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction [forcible entry; injection], the organism suffers and becomes resistant.

    This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of revolt against the second parenteral injection [outside the intestines; intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] which would be fatal.

    At the first injection, the organism was taken by surprise and did not resist. At the second injection, the organism mans its defences and answers by the anaphylactic shock. Seen in these terms, anaphylaxis is an universal defence mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances in the blood, whence they can not be eliminated."

    For further reading:

    How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society?

    BS”D I’m absolutely blown away by what I found in this article…

    Read more

    11 days ago · 6 likes · 2 comments · Brucha Weisberger

    Art for today: Angels and Demons series, oil on linen. NFS.



    https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/p-148130497
    The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common? This article is too long for email. Please read in Substack app. Remember this quote? Credit Sage Hana: The 2nd shot, 21 days apart. Why the 2nd shot and why 21 days, exactly? Let’s take a look. The anaphylaxis research history. Charles Richet Charles Robert Richet (25 August 1850 – 4 December 1935) was a French physiologist at the Collège de France and immunology pioneer. In 1913, he won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine "in recognition of his work on anaphylaxis". Richet devoted many years to the study of paranormal and spiritualist phenomena, coining the term "ectoplasm". He believed in the inferiority of black people, was a proponent of eugenics, and presided over the French Eugenics Society towards the end of his life. I would like to acknowledge that I knew not much about anaphylaxis other than it is a dangerous, life threatening allergic reaction. I witnessed it in a local grocery store pharmacy that administered covid vaccines. A young apparently healthy man (in his 30s) dropped on the floor immediately after the injection and was lying there when I walked in. Everyone was behaving like it wasn’t a big deal. I wanted to be let off this planet. While working on this article, I ran a quick CDC VAERS query. All vaccines for all time in VAERS (about 30 years) produced 12,200+ anaphylactic reactions and 2200+ shocks. Covid-19 vaccines produced 9,000+ anaphylactic reactions and 1000+ anaphylactic shocks. mRNA injections are responsible for 11k of the total 12k reported anaphylactic reactions. However, that’s not the entire story of anaphylaxis. Katherine Watt pointed me to Charles Richet’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech and to a couple of articles by this author (Northern Tracey). I suggest you read them. The author was way ahead of all of us on this topic. Katherine published on our email exchange at the time: Intentional elusivity of definitions for virus and vaccine. Orientation for new readers; American Domestic Bioterrorism Program; Tools for dismantling kill box anti-law… Read more 12 days ago · 146 likes · Katherine Watt As I mentioned in my email exchange with Katherine, Richet’s own work clearly referred to the poison he made from tentacles of Actinaria (sea anemone) as the “virus of Actinaria”. This confirmed one more time what we already knew: viruses are not some sort of natural “seeds” of disease, randomly flying around and jumping strangers. They are poisons - either natural toxins excreted by plants, bacteria and animals, or poisons made by people like Richet and now CDC/pharma. They do not transmit by air or casual contact. What becomes apparent from reviewing Richet’s 100+ year old research - the only thing you really need to worry about with respect to “viruses/poisons” is an injection of biologics (proteins) for the 2nd time within the anaphylaxis window that starts typically after 20 days and lasting anywhere from months to years to the lifetime. This can happen in nature from the 2nd bite of an animal/insect carrying same biological toxin (a very low probability event nowadays), or from what is now forced by the government policy - from the needle wielded by a brainless money whore masquerading as a healthcare provider who is doing it for the 90th time in your or your child’s life “because science”. The original biologics regulation law in 1902 was called the virus-toxin act. Early on, virus, toxin, antitoxin, serum and vaccine were used interchangeably, because the vaccinators knew what they were propagating in the labs and licensed establishments - biological poisons. This lead me to become intensely interested in Richet’s work. I found his book describing the work on anaphylaxis published in 1913. I am including several screenshots from it, so you can read for yourself. Richet alluded to vaccination being a failure from the first attempts, because, instead of producing expected immunity it produced violent reactions or even death from minute (not considered dangerous) amounts of the toxin at the 2nd exposure. This happened in a random % of the population. One example quoted anaphylaxis rates from injecting cattle with anthrax serum: approximately 10% became violently ill and many died. The population who would react anaphylactically is a-priory not distinguishable from others, because it is not known who is already sensitized to which biological substances. This is still the case. There is no way to determine upfront who will be anaphylactically sensitized by an injection of a biologic (a protein). The establishment healthcare denies this, proclaiming all vaccines “very safe”. This is categorically not true, as becomes very apparent once you read Richet’s work related to injecting biological substances, even benign ones like milk or albumins (derived from wheat and other cereals). Digesting a protein and injecting it directly into the blood stream are two entirely different things! For example, it is safe to ingest snake venom for most people (provided no sores or abrasions in the mouth). I am not advising you try this, but sucking the venom out immediately post bite has been used as a bush medicine method. However, a snake bite delivering the same venom directly into the blood stream is an entirely different story. You notice that Richet talks about the “second injection”. This refers to the nature of anaphylaxis: the first interaction with an injected toxin may be not even noticed, be well tolerated or may be at worst mildly irritating. After a period of 2-3 weeks, the second exposure, however, may become very dangerous or fatal. The second exposure in most of Richet’s experiments was by injection. However, with high enough sensitization by the first injection, the anaphylaxis could also result from environmental exposure or ingestion, depending on the degree of sensitization to the “allergen”, or “toxigen” as he termed it. Do you understand peanut allergy, gluten allergy, soy allergy, etc. now? The things that didn’t exist before peanut oil, wheat albumins and other common food proteins became widely used in vaccines (and were proclaimed “generally safe” because it’s just food). Importantly, Richet has demonstrated that anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock and the variety of allergic reactions are all the same phenomenon, stemming from the same thing - a sensitizing exposure by proteins reaching the blood stream and bypassing normal digestion. Richet provided principles of anaphylaxis in his book: He also summarized findings from other researchers working on anaphylaxis at the time. Notice especially points 8 and 10 - this describes anaphylaxis from “vaccination” and subsequent allergic reactions, even to non-proteins (crystalloids): Richet found that the state of anaphylaxis sets in after a period of 2-3 weeks (it can vary), and depending on the initial toxin/protein, the sensitization state may last from weeks to years, and possibly be permanent. At the time that he wrote the book, he mentioned that in people anaphylactic/allergenic state was observed up to 6 years, but it may be permanent. Do you see now, why most vaccines are delivered in at least 2 doses, and they are separated by at least 21 days? They want to see if they induce severe anaphylaxis (i.e. life threatening kind). Here’s Pfizer’s “postmarketing experience” document, compiling adverse events as of Feb 2021 (first 2 months of vaccine rollout): This table is is not all cases of anaphylaxis, of course, but only the most severe form - the shock. Anaphylaxis is all allergic reactions and autoimmune disease, but these things are very easy to deny as they take a while to manifest and are not immediately deadly. The industry has developed perfect gaslighting strategies: “genetic mutations”, “toxic food”, “stress”, “novel syndromes”, and even better - glorification of chronic illness via movies, advertising, non-profits and other economic activity feeding off vaccine-induced destruction of natural health. In case of mRNA vaccines, they absolutely knew that they are killing people with anaphylaxis, but since that was the goal of the military weapon, the shots have not been removed and continue being pushed on the public. Another interesting observation made by Richet is that white mice and some of the breeds of rats do not experience anaphylaxis. No wonder these animals are now the staple of pharmaceutical research! While Richet himself seemed to be very much pro-vaccination, his main conclusions about anaphylaxis speak soundly against it. It is impossible to design a safe vaccine, because it is impossible to predict anaphylactic reactions. Each individual is unique, a product of heredity and interactions with environment. Introduction of foreign, non-self proteins is an assault on this natural equilibrium and can only result in a disaster. That vaccination in people induces anaphylaxis was known early on: And was given the name “allergy”, possibly to hide the fact that it’s vaccine-induced anaphylaxis: These psychos would even kill themselves, and still not get the message: Substances that induce anaphylaxis - colloids. Difference between Crystalloids and Colloids Colloids vs crystalloids Colloids and crystalloids are two types of fluid solutions used for intravenous (IV) infusion in medicine. The primary distinction between them lies in their particle size, composition, and behavior in the body. Colloids Consist of large particles (0.5-100 nm) that do not pass through semi-permeable membranes, such as capillary walls Examples: gelatin, albumin, hetastarch, dextran Act as plasma volume expanders, maintaining blood volume and pressure Have a high oncotic pressure, which helps to draw fluid into the vascular compartment May cause anaphylaxis in some patients More expensive than crystalloids Suitable for patients with severe fluid loss, trauma, burns, or sepsis Crystalloids Consist of small particles (less than 0.5 nm) that can pass through semi-permeable membranes Examples: normal saline (0.9% NaCl), lactated Ringer’s solution, 5% dextrose in water Act as isotonic or hypertonic solutions, expanding extracellular fluid volume Have a lower oncotic pressure, which can lead to fluid accumulation in tissues Less likely to cause anaphylaxis Generally less expensive than colloids Suitable for patients with mild to moderate fluid loss, dehydration, or electrolyte imbalance In general, small molecule drugs do not cause anaphylaxis. Vaccines are, of course, colloids as they contain a mixture of proteins and lipids in suspension. Properly matched blood transfusions do not generally produce anaphylaxis. However, since all blood banks are now contaminated with mRNA-injected blood, it is not possible to say that they are safe. I personally would not accept blood, except from a known donor. Richet proposed that a “toxigen” which developed after the initial sensitizing injection in the blood was responsible for subsequent state of anaphylaxis: “Infectious disease” explained by anaphylaxis: The phenomenon of anaphylaxis may help explain both, the natural outbreaks of what appears as “contagious illness” in human history and the skyrocketing chronic illness in the modern western populations. It is known that the bacteria implicated in diseases like cholera or the plague are commonly present in the intestinal tracts of many people and do not seem to cause any issues. Then, how does an epidemic of the plague or cholera occur? Imagine living in a crowded, rapidly growing European city around 15th - 17th century: This is one of the main streets in Amsterdam, with raw sewage flowing in the middle, domestic animals sharing lower floors of the buildings, no plumbing, sanitation or refrigeration of food. The rats are very common. They bite and the bites carry common proteins found in that area’s sewage. Once enough people in the same area have been bitten for the first time, some weeks go by, anaphylactic state develops, and then the rats bite some of the same people again. If enough of these events occur, an “epidemic” of the plague/smallpox/cholera starts in this community. Hygiene, plumbing, water sanitation, refrigeration and air conditioning were the most significant technological innovations that defeated epidemics by removing the chances of injection of anaphylactizing toxigens by common pests. So, instead, we now have the establishment “healthcare” assaulting the society like the medieval sewer rats with poisoned needles. All vaccines contain two main sources of injury - the proteins that are used to formulate them, including the toxins (“viruses”) and the vehicle which frequently contains other common proteins like albumins (gluten allergy), egg proteins, soy, corn, casein (milk intolerance), etc. There are also “contaminants” and “adjuvants” such as toxic metals, and more recently with introduction recombinant vaccines - DNA plasmids that transfect cells. The mRNA shots are even worse as they contain numerous toxic vectors. Now imagine a baby getting 70+ different shots, most in several doses. It is guaranteed that the baby will get anaphylactized to many commonly encountered proteins, and that a chronic inflammation/allergy will result. Anaphylaxis, being an intestinal reaction, is also tied to destruction of microbiome, which I will address in later articles. Practically all chronic conditions, especially in children, can be tied back to vaccine-induced anaphylaxis. Many people state that food that we eat and the environment are full of toxins. While this may be true, especially for some locations and some socioeconomic groups, the food and environmental toxicity pales in comparison to what happens when the toxins, especially proteins are injected directly into the blood stream. I am in full support of improving the quality of food and cleaning up the environmental pollution, but if we need a policy to combat the chronic disease epidemic, there is one straightforward answer that all politicians and most experts today soundly ignore - the catastrophic damage to health induced by vaccines. I would like to end with the quote from Richet: Richet: "We are so constituted that we can never receive other proteins into the blood than those that have been modified by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates by effraction [forcible entry; injection], the organism suffers and becomes resistant. This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of revolt against the second parenteral injection [outside the intestines; intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous] which would be fatal. At the first injection, the organism was taken by surprise and did not resist. At the second injection, the organism mans its defences and answers by the anaphylactic shock. Seen in these terms, anaphylaxis is an universal defence mechanism against the penetration of heterogenous substances in the blood, whence they can not be eliminated." For further reading: How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? BS”D I’m absolutely blown away by what I found in this article… Read more 11 days ago · 6 likes · 2 comments · Brucha Weisberger Art for today: Angels and Demons series, oil on linen. NFS. https://substack.com/@sashalatypova/p-148130497
    SUBSTACK.COM
    Sasha Latypova | Substack
    I could not become a professional artist, so I became a pharma and medical device R&D executive. If you are interested in my art, visit sashalatypova.com
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2673 Views
  • There Are No Licensed COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 12 — But CDC Wants Babies to Get 3 Pfizer Shots by Age 9 Months
    According to the latest CDC guidance, 9-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination.

    baby and covid vaccine with "3rd dose" on bottle
    COVID

    by Ray L. Flores II, Esq.Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
    September 3, 2024

    baby and covid vaccine with "3rd dose" on bottle
    Nine-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    The CDC’s updated guidance, issued Aug. 30, states that children — as young as 6 months old — should get either two doses of the 2024-2025 Moderna vaccine or three doses of the 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

    If getting the new Pfizer shot, the baby is supposed to receive the first dose at 6 months, the second dose three weeks later and the third dose at least eight weeks after the second dose — meaning, that by 9 months old, babies are supposed to have received three Pfizer shots.

    If getting the latest Moderna shot, the CDC recommends babies get the first dose at age 6 months and the second dose a month later.

    The latest Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots for children under 12 are unlicensed in the U.S. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted only emergency use authorization (EUA) for the vaccines.

    Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland told The Defender, “The earlier COVID shots have been proven unsafe and ineffective. Now we’re asked to believe that newer versions are miraculously safe and effective?”

    “This is an insult to people’s intelligence,” she said, “I pray that parents will have the good sense to say no to these dangerous and unnecessary shots for babies.”

    As of July 28, 37,814 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination had been reported to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, run by the FDA and CDC.

    Of those, 187 reports were for children and teens under 18. Nearly 13,000 reports listed the age as “unknown.”

    VAERS analyst and expert Albert Benavides recently told The Defender he believes VAERS is “throttling” and underreporting deaths of all ages following COVID-19 vaccination.

    Meanwhile, the CDC continues to tell the public that COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.”


    Coming to a​​theater near youSeptember 2024

    Get Tickets


    CDC ‘absolutely misleading’ public on safety of EUA vaccines

    Holland said the CDC is “absolutely misleading” the public by asserting that COVID-19 EUA vaccines are safe and effective because EUA vaccines are not held to the same safety or efficacy standards as licensed vaccines.

    “By law,” she explained, “EUA products ‘may be effective,’ and they have not undergone the safety testing required to permit licensing.”

    “This is one more horrific example of the CDC putting profits before people and acting as an unethical arm of Big Pharma’s marketing operation,” Holland added.

    CHD Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker agreed. “It is criminal that these untested vaccines are being recommended to infants and children, especially given the fraudulent tactics to market them to an unsuspecting public,” Hooker told The Defender.

    Gavel and money vaccines
    Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding?

    Learn More

    There’s no licensed COVID vaccine for kids under 12

    There are still no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12, Hooker said — so all COVID-19 vaccines given to young kids are EUA products.

    The FDA’s website on EUA for medical products states that EUA vaccines only have to meet the standard of “may be effective” as long as if, “based on the totality of the scientific evidence, it is reasonable to believe that the product may be effective for the specified use.”

    “The ‘may be effective’ standard for EUAs provides for a lower level of evidence than the ‘effectiveness’ standard that FDA uses for product approvals,” the website states.

    Before a vaccine can be fully licensed, the vaccine maker typically is required to conduct numerous clinical trials to demonstrate that the product is safe. However, the safety requirements for EUA are more flexible.

    According to the FDA:

    “The amount and type(s) of safety information that FDA recommends be submitted as part of a request for an EUA will differ depending upon a number of factors, including whether the product is approved for another indication and, in the case of an unapproved product, the product’s stage of development.”

    Despite this, the first statement on the CDC’s “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children” says, “COVID-19 vaccination for children is safe.”

    Risks outweigh benefits for kids

    Hooker said the CDC’s actions are especially problematic as, historically, the meaning of “safe” has been interpreted by regulatory authorities as meaning that the benefits of a drug outweigh its risks.

    “With the risk to children of dying from a COVID-19 infection being statistically zero, it is unclear if there is any benefit,” he said.

    Meanwhile, the CDC still claims that “while adverse reactions are rare, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known risks of COVID-19 and possible severe complications.”

    This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.

    The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write.

    Please Donate Today

    Pfizer fact sheet more forthcoming about risks

    For licensed vaccines, the CDC typically provides an official vaccine information statement (VIS) that describes the vaccine’s risks and potential benefits.

    According to the CDC website, “Federal law requires that healthcare staff provide a VIS to a patient, parent, or legal representative before each dose of certain vaccines.”

    However, for EUA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC directs people to “fact sheets” — produced by the vaccine manufacturer, not the CDC, and authorized by the FDA — which detail the product’s risks and benefits.

    There is no federal law requiring healthcare providers to share these fact sheets with patients, or parents of minors, before a COVID-19 vaccination.

    “Pfizer’s own ‘fact sheet’ for its latest COVID-19 vaccine appears to give a more accurate picture [of the vaccine’s risks] than the CDC’s own websites,” Hooker said. “Shouldn’t the CDC be more a watchdog than Pfizer?”

    For example, Pfizer’s fact sheet states, “A product authorized for emergency use has not undergone the same type of review by FDA as an FDA-approved product.”

    The Pfizer fact sheet also acknowledges that its vaccine “may not protect everyone” and that reported side effects associated with the Pfizer vaccines include myocarditis and pericarditis.

    Hooker pointed out that research has shown that vaccine-induced myocarditis, inflammation of the heart, and pericarditis, inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart, can be fatal.

    He urged parents to “read between the lines” when assessing the CDC’s COVID-19 vaccination recommendation for babies and children.

    “Most of all,” he added, “use common sense to decide if the CDC’s and the FDA’s logic is sound.”


    The CDC recommends THREE Pfizer Covid shots for babies by age 9 months. These shots are unsafe and ineffective, especially over the long term. And babies are at near-zero risk from Covid. So whose benefit is the CDC serving here?

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/babies-three-pfizer-covid-vaccine-doses-cdc/
    There Are No Licensed COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 12 — But CDC Wants Babies to Get 3 Pfizer Shots by Age 9 Months According to the latest CDC guidance, 9-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination. baby and covid vaccine with "3rd dose" on bottle COVID by Ray L. Flores II, Esq.Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D. September 3, 2024 baby and covid vaccine with "3rd dose" on bottle Nine-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC’s updated guidance, issued Aug. 30, states that children — as young as 6 months old — should get either two doses of the 2024-2025 Moderna vaccine or three doses of the 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. If getting the new Pfizer shot, the baby is supposed to receive the first dose at 6 months, the second dose three weeks later and the third dose at least eight weeks after the second dose — meaning, that by 9 months old, babies are supposed to have received three Pfizer shots. If getting the latest Moderna shot, the CDC recommends babies get the first dose at age 6 months and the second dose a month later. The latest Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots for children under 12 are unlicensed in the U.S. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted only emergency use authorization (EUA) for the vaccines. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland told The Defender, “The earlier COVID shots have been proven unsafe and ineffective. Now we’re asked to believe that newer versions are miraculously safe and effective?” “This is an insult to people’s intelligence,” she said, “I pray that parents will have the good sense to say no to these dangerous and unnecessary shots for babies.” As of July 28, 37,814 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination had been reported to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, run by the FDA and CDC. Of those, 187 reports were for children and teens under 18. Nearly 13,000 reports listed the age as “unknown.” VAERS analyst and expert Albert Benavides recently told The Defender he believes VAERS is “throttling” and underreporting deaths of all ages following COVID-19 vaccination. Meanwhile, the CDC continues to tell the public that COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.” Coming to a​​theater near youSeptember 2024 Get Tickets CDC ‘absolutely misleading’ public on safety of EUA vaccines Holland said the CDC is “absolutely misleading” the public by asserting that COVID-19 EUA vaccines are safe and effective because EUA vaccines are not held to the same safety or efficacy standards as licensed vaccines. “By law,” she explained, “EUA products ‘may be effective,’ and they have not undergone the safety testing required to permit licensing.” “This is one more horrific example of the CDC putting profits before people and acting as an unethical arm of Big Pharma’s marketing operation,” Holland added. CHD Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker agreed. “It is criminal that these untested vaccines are being recommended to infants and children, especially given the fraudulent tactics to market them to an unsuspecting public,” Hooker told The Defender. Gavel and money vaccines Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding? Learn More There’s no licensed COVID vaccine for kids under 12 There are still no licensed COVID-19 vaccines available for children under 12, Hooker said — so all COVID-19 vaccines given to young kids are EUA products. The FDA’s website on EUA for medical products states that EUA vaccines only have to meet the standard of “may be effective” as long as if, “based on the totality of the scientific evidence, it is reasonable to believe that the product may be effective for the specified use.” “The ‘may be effective’ standard for EUAs provides for a lower level of evidence than the ‘effectiveness’ standard that FDA uses for product approvals,” the website states. Before a vaccine can be fully licensed, the vaccine maker typically is required to conduct numerous clinical trials to demonstrate that the product is safe. However, the safety requirements for EUA are more flexible. According to the FDA: “The amount and type(s) of safety information that FDA recommends be submitted as part of a request for an EUA will differ depending upon a number of factors, including whether the product is approved for another indication and, in the case of an unapproved product, the product’s stage of development.” Despite this, the first statement on the CDC’s “6 Things to Know about COVID-19 Vaccination for Children” says, “COVID-19 vaccination for children is safe.” Risks outweigh benefits for kids Hooker said the CDC’s actions are especially problematic as, historically, the meaning of “safe” has been interpreted by regulatory authorities as meaning that the benefits of a drug outweigh its risks. “With the risk to children of dying from a COVID-19 infection being statistically zero, it is unclear if there is any benefit,” he said. Meanwhile, the CDC still claims that “while adverse reactions are rare, the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the known risks of COVID-19 and possible severe complications.” This article was funded by critical thinkers like you. The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won’t write. Please Donate Today Pfizer fact sheet more forthcoming about risks For licensed vaccines, the CDC typically provides an official vaccine information statement (VIS) that describes the vaccine’s risks and potential benefits. According to the CDC website, “Federal law requires that healthcare staff provide a VIS to a patient, parent, or legal representative before each dose of certain vaccines.” However, for EUA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC directs people to “fact sheets” — produced by the vaccine manufacturer, not the CDC, and authorized by the FDA — which detail the product’s risks and benefits. There is no federal law requiring healthcare providers to share these fact sheets with patients, or parents of minors, before a COVID-19 vaccination. “Pfizer’s own ‘fact sheet’ for its latest COVID-19 vaccine appears to give a more accurate picture [of the vaccine’s risks] than the CDC’s own websites,” Hooker said. “Shouldn’t the CDC be more a watchdog than Pfizer?” For example, Pfizer’s fact sheet states, “A product authorized for emergency use has not undergone the same type of review by FDA as an FDA-approved product.” The Pfizer fact sheet also acknowledges that its vaccine “may not protect everyone” and that reported side effects associated with the Pfizer vaccines include myocarditis and pericarditis. Hooker pointed out that research has shown that vaccine-induced myocarditis, inflammation of the heart, and pericarditis, inflammation of the tissue surrounding the heart, can be fatal. He urged parents to “read between the lines” when assessing the CDC’s COVID-19 vaccination recommendation for babies and children. “Most of all,” he added, “use common sense to decide if the CDC’s and the FDA’s logic is sound.” The CDC recommends THREE Pfizer Covid shots for babies by age 9 months. These shots are unsafe and ineffective, especially over the long term. And babies are at near-zero risk from Covid. So whose benefit is the CDC serving here? https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/babies-three-pfizer-covid-vaccine-doses-cdc/
    CHILDRENSHEALTHDEFENSE.ORG
    There Are No Licensed COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 12 — But CDC Wants Babies to Get 3 Pfizer Shots by Age 9 Months
    According to the latest CDC guidance, 9-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1639 Views
  • Monkeypox is a coverup for damage done to Immune System by COVID Vaccination resulting in Shingles, Autoimmune Blistering Disease & Herpes Infection
    2nd Smartest Guy in the World
    As yet another global scamdemic “emergency” in MonkeyPox, or the rebranded Mpox, was recently announced by the Marxist Ethiopian war criminal, BigPharma bioterrorist, and Bill Gates installed Director-General of the World Health Organization…

    …what we are now seeing is the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon VAIDS coverup, with “vaccine” refuseniks and genetically modified humans alike in the crosshairs of the WHO — which is nothing more than the “health” depopulation node of the United Nations and their Intelligence Industrial Complex partners-in-crime — and that means total global surveillance and contact tracing ahead of their attempted followup planetary “pandemic” lockdown…

    They are already seeding and normalizing said lockdowns in various captured nations like Canada…

    Image
    Just in time for the possible total destruction of America if the deranged Marxist puppet Kamala Cloward-Piven Harris “wins” the upcoming presidential shit show, which is why they are considering outright cancelling the elections due to a “pandemic,” or whichever psyop they believe will be most effective.

    Which is why the CDC is also at it, issuing a “health alert” over Parvovirus; in other words, another angle to the VAIDS epidemic coverup as the genetically modified humans and their devastated immune systems are presenting with all kinds of adverse events, not just limited to the inability to fend off viruses, STDs, or even the common cold.

    Two years ago a most prescient article was written warning of this MonkeyPox scam which today is particularly worth revisiting:


    by The Exposé

    Do you not find it curious how in the space of 50 years, monkeypox has never really gotten off the ground outside of a couple of countries in Africa, but then within two years of the alleged emergence of Covid-19, monkeypox is suddenly in every Western nation and being hyped up by public health authorities, the mainstream media and the World Health Organization?

    If you don’t, you won’t want to read this because you may miss the latest episode of BBC News at 6 pm. But if you do, you may or may not be surprised to find that evidence suggests the alleged monkeypox outbreak could actually be a result of the Covid-19 vaccination programme.

    How?

    Well, it has something to do with herpes, shingles, auto-immune blistering disease and the fact that Covid-19 vaccination greatly damages the natural immune system.



    Here’s a map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –


    Only joking. The above is actually a map showing the main distributions of the Pfizer vaccine.

    Here’s the actual map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 –


    Source
    Here’s both maps together so you can play a game of spot the difference with them –


    Apart from a couple of countries, there isn’t really any difference, and every country that has reported alleged cases of monkeypox since May 2022 where it was not already endemic, is a country that also distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection.

    Now, this could of course just be another coincidence in a long line of “coincidences” that have occurred since early 2020. But unfortunately, evidence suggests otherwise.

    Human monkeypox was first identified in humans in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo in a 9-year-old boy. Since then, human cases of monkeypox have been reported in 11 African countries. It wasn’t until 2003 that the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was recorded, and this was in the United States.

    According to a scientific study published in 1988, between 1981-1986, 977 persons with skin eruption not clinically diagnosed as human monkeypox were laboratory tested in Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo).

    The Scientists who conducted the study stated the following –

    The diagnostic difficulties were mainly based on clinical features characteristic of chickenpox: regional pleomorphism (in 46% of misdiagnosed cases), indefinite body-distribution of skin eruptions (49%), and centripetal distribution of skin lesions (17%). Lymph-node enlargement was observed in 76% of misdiagnosed patients. In the absence of smallpox, the main clinical diagnostic problem is the differentiation of human monkeypox from chickenpox.’

    In Layman’s terms, distinguishing monkeypox from chickenpox is incredibly difficult, and chickenpox is caused by a type of herpes virus.

    The chickenpox virus is technically known as the varicella-zoster virus, and just like its close relative the herpes simplex virus, it becomes a lifelong resident in the body.

    And like its other cousin, genital herpes, varicella may be silent for many years, hiding out inside nerve cells and can reactivate later, wreaking havoc in the form of the excruciating skin disorder, shingles, which is a blistering, burning skin rash.

    Unfortunately, or fortunately; depending on whether you chose to get the Covid-19 injection, official Government data and confidential Pfizer documents strongly suggest the Covid-19 injection may be reactivating the dormant chickenpox virus or herpes virus due to the frightening damage it does to the immune system.

    This means we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people.

    The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

    But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

    Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on June 1st 2022.

    One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 21 of the confidential document contains data on adverse events of special interest, with one of these specifically being herpes viral infections.


    Source
    According to the document by the end of February 2021, just 2 months after the Pfizer vaccine was granted emergency use authorisation in both the USA and UK, Pfizer has received 8,152 reports relating to herpes infection, and 18 of these had already led to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

    Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a systemic, dysfunctional inflammatory response that requires long intensive care unit (ICU) stay. It is characterized with a high mortality rate depending on the number of organs involved. It can be caused by herpes infection as this scientific study found here proves.

    Further evidence published by the U.S Government, but more specifically the Centers for Disease Control shows that cases of herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome really exploded in the USA following the administration of the Covid-19 injection.

    The following chart shows the number of herpes infections/complications that have been reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to all vaccines (including the Covid-19 jabs) by the year reported, and the Covid-19 vaccines only by the year reported –


    Source Data
    The following chart shows adverse events to the Covid-19 injections reported to the CDC relating to herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome up to 13th May 2022.

    It also shows the number of adverse events reported against the Flu Vaccines, all vaccines combined (excluding Covid-19 injections) and the HPV/Smallpox vaccines between 2008 and 2020 –


    Source Data
    As you can see the Covid-19 injections have caused the most herpes related infections, and this is within 17 months. When comparing these to the number of flareups reported against the HPV/Smallpox vaccines in 13 years, these numbers are extremely concerning.

    This isn’t because so many people have been given a Covid-19 injection either. Official CDC numbers actually show 1.7 billion doses of influenza vaccine alone were administered between 2008 and 2020. Whereas, as of 6th May 2022, 580 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine had been administered in the USA.

    The following chart shows the rate per 1 million doses administered of adverse events related to herpes, shingles and multiple organ syndrome –


    The rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Flu jabs is 0.75 adverse events per 1 million doses administered. But the rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections is 31.31 adverse events per 1 million doses administered.

    That’s a 4,075% difference, and indicative of a very serious problem. A serious problem that is being caused by the fact the Covid-19 injections decimate the immune system.

    The following chart shows the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated population in England in the UK Health Security Agency Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13 Vaccine Surveillance reports of 2022 –


    Data shows that vaccine effectiveness fell month on month, with the lowest effectiveness recorded among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-391%. This age group also experienced the sharpest decline, falling from minus-104.69% in week 3.

    But one of the more concerning declines in vaccine effectiveness has been recorded among 18-29-year-olds, falling to minus-231% by Week 12 of 2022 from +10.19% in Week 3.

    A negative vaccine effectiveness indicates immune system damage because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

    The Covid-19 injection specifically instructs cells to produce the alleged SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein. The immune system is supposed to take care of the rest and then remember to do it again if it ever encounters the SARS-CoV-2 virus. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weakens over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

    The following chart shows the Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 by vaccination status across England in March 2022 based on data published by the UKHSA –


    As you can see, most vaccinated age groups have a higher Covid-19 death rate than the unvaccinated age groups. That’s not indicative of an effective vaccine, it’s indicative of damage done to the immune system by having the Covid vaccine. How else can you explain the fact the vaccinated are more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated?

    We’re also seeing the same when it comes to non-Covid-19 deaths, and data suggests it takes approximately five months for enough damage to be done to the immune system by the Covid-19 injection for a recipient to be more likely to die.

    On the 17th May, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published its latest dataset on deaths by vaccination status in England, and it has revealed a whole host of shocking findings.

    Table 1 of the ONS dataset contains figures on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22. The first Covid-19 injection was administered in England on 8th December 2021, and here are the figures on mortality rates by vaccination status in the following 4 months –


    The unvaccinated were substantially more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than the vaccinated population in both January and February 2021, before the rates seemed to normalise by the end of April.

    But look at what happened from May 2021 onwards –


    All of a sudden, the vaccinated population as a whole were more likely to die than the unvaccinated of any cause other than Covid-19, and this trend has continued month after month since. It also turns out this trend tally’s up with those who received the Covid-19 injections first, with people in England vaccinated by order of age.

    The ONS data either indicates that the Covid-19 injections take approximately 5 months to completely decimate the immune system to the point where a person’s chances of dying of any cause are significantly increased, or it indicates that the Covid-19 injections are directly killing people in the thousands with a slow and painful death that takes on average 5 months to conclude.

    So by now, you must be up to speed with the fact that the Covid-19 injections most definitely damage the natural immune system. In which case it’s perfectly plausible that dormant herpes and varicella-zoster viruses are being reactivated resulting in an unprecedented outbreak of herpes and shingles infections.

    But there’s another condition that authorities could be falsely claiming is monkeypox, and we need to return to the confidential Pfizer documents to find it.

    The condition is hidden within the 9-page long list of adverse events of special interest at the end of Pfizer’s reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf document.


    Source
    Autoimmune blistering disease.

    Autoimmune blistering disease causes blisters on the skin and mucous membranes throughout the body. It can affect the mouth, nose, throat, eyes, and genitals.

    It is not fully understood but “experts” believe that it is triggered when a person who has a genetic tendency to get this condition comes into contact with an environmental trigger. This might be a chemical or a medicine. Such as the Pfizer Covid-19 injection?

    So there you have it, a whole host of evidence that suggests authorities could quite easily be covering up the consequences of Covid-19 vaccination with a fake monkeypox pandemic. But if our display of evidence isn’t enough to convince you of this then perhaps this scientific study published in October 2021 is –


    Source
    But even though the whole monkeypox drama might be another charade, don’t be fooled into thinking authorities aren’t willing to take this as far or even further than the miserable two years they have forced the world to suffer in the name of Covid-19.

    In the UK, the UK Health Security Agency has just made monkeypox a notifiable disease, meaning all doctors and GP’s must report any cases they uncover to the UKHSA. This decision comes on top of the previous advice to isolate at home for three weeks if a close contact of anyone with suspected monkeypox.

    Meanwhile in the USA the CDC has just announced that the wearing of face masks is now recommended again to “prevent transmission of monkeypox in the community”.

    We doubt the CDC will ever get the memo that masks simply do not work, but let’s pretend they do and that there really is a monkeypox outbreak. Is the CDC not aware the monkeypox virus is not airborne and only transmitted by physical, and usually intimate contact?

    And now we have Dr Tedros, the head of the World Health Organization warning that monkeypox is now a real risk, and the WHO is extremely concerned for the safety of children and pregnant women. In a new statement, he finished by stating the WHO will publish a set of guidelines and advice for countries to follow forthwith…

    You can see where this is going, can’t you?


    It’s rather obvious where this went, and where it will keep going unless arrests are finally made.

    Also, today is the last day of the FLASH SALE…

    VIR-X FLASH SALE: The Most Potent Immune Support Nutraceutical

    VIR-X FLASH SALE: The Most Potent Immune Support Nutraceutical
    The new and improved VIR-X formulation offers the most potent synergistic antiviral and anti-Spike Protein (SP1 and SP2) formulation possible. This product also ensures overall wellness, is anti-cancer, and offers powerful antioxidant support. It is manufactured in the best American cGMP facility using the finest ingredients that are rigorously tested …

    Read full story

    …so take this opportunity to stock up on lifesaving products like VIR-X, Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Doxycyline and organic full spectrum CBD oil by using code VIRX20.

    Upon adding products to your cart, please go to the cart icon at the top right corner of your browser page and click it, then choose the VIEW CART option whereby you will be redirected to a page where you can enter the code VIRX20 in the Use Coupon Code field.

    This flash sale ends this evening, August 20th, 2024.

    Please contact the company directly with any product questions: [email protected]

    They want you dead.

    Do NOT comply.






    Upgrade to paid

    Shop 2SG merch

    Use code 2SGPET for 10% off VIR-X

    Use code 2SGPET for 10% off PetMectin

    Use code 2SGPET for 10% off PetDazole

    Use code 2SGPET for 10% off CBD-X

    Use code 2SGPET for 10% off FishCycline


    https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/monkeypox-is-a-coverup-for-damage
    Monkeypox is a coverup for damage done to Immune System by COVID Vaccination resulting in Shingles, Autoimmune Blistering Disease & Herpes Infection 2nd Smartest Guy in the World As yet another global scamdemic “emergency” in MonkeyPox, or the rebranded Mpox, was recently announced by the Marxist Ethiopian war criminal, BigPharma bioterrorist, and Bill Gates installed Director-General of the World Health Organization… …what we are now seeing is the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon VAIDS coverup, with “vaccine” refuseniks and genetically modified humans alike in the crosshairs of the WHO — which is nothing more than the “health” depopulation node of the United Nations and their Intelligence Industrial Complex partners-in-crime — and that means total global surveillance and contact tracing ahead of their attempted followup planetary “pandemic” lockdown… They are already seeding and normalizing said lockdowns in various captured nations like Canada… Image Just in time for the possible total destruction of America if the deranged Marxist puppet Kamala Cloward-Piven Harris “wins” the upcoming presidential shit show, which is why they are considering outright cancelling the elections due to a “pandemic,” or whichever psyop they believe will be most effective. Which is why the CDC is also at it, issuing a “health alert” over Parvovirus; in other words, another angle to the VAIDS epidemic coverup as the genetically modified humans and their devastated immune systems are presenting with all kinds of adverse events, not just limited to the inability to fend off viruses, STDs, or even the common cold. Two years ago a most prescient article was written warning of this MonkeyPox scam which today is particularly worth revisiting: by The Exposé Do you not find it curious how in the space of 50 years, monkeypox has never really gotten off the ground outside of a couple of countries in Africa, but then within two years of the alleged emergence of Covid-19, monkeypox is suddenly in every Western nation and being hyped up by public health authorities, the mainstream media and the World Health Organization? If you don’t, you won’t want to read this because you may miss the latest episode of BBC News at 6 pm. But if you do, you may or may not be surprised to find that evidence suggests the alleged monkeypox outbreak could actually be a result of the Covid-19 vaccination programme. How? Well, it has something to do with herpes, shingles, auto-immune blistering disease and the fact that Covid-19 vaccination greatly damages the natural immune system. Here’s a map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 – Only joking. The above is actually a map showing the main distributions of the Pfizer vaccine. Here’s the actual map showing countries where “confirmed” cases of monkeypox have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) since the middle of May 2022 – Source Here’s both maps together so you can play a game of spot the difference with them – Apart from a couple of countries, there isn’t really any difference, and every country that has reported alleged cases of monkeypox since May 2022 where it was not already endemic, is a country that also distributed the Pfizer Covid-19 injection. Now, this could of course just be another coincidence in a long line of “coincidences” that have occurred since early 2020. But unfortunately, evidence suggests otherwise. Human monkeypox was first identified in humans in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo in a 9-year-old boy. Since then, human cases of monkeypox have been reported in 11 African countries. It wasn’t until 2003 that the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was recorded, and this was in the United States. According to a scientific study published in 1988, between 1981-1986, 977 persons with skin eruption not clinically diagnosed as human monkeypox were laboratory tested in Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo). The Scientists who conducted the study stated the following – The diagnostic difficulties were mainly based on clinical features characteristic of chickenpox: regional pleomorphism (in 46% of misdiagnosed cases), indefinite body-distribution of skin eruptions (49%), and centripetal distribution of skin lesions (17%). Lymph-node enlargement was observed in 76% of misdiagnosed patients. In the absence of smallpox, the main clinical diagnostic problem is the differentiation of human monkeypox from chickenpox.’ In Layman’s terms, distinguishing monkeypox from chickenpox is incredibly difficult, and chickenpox is caused by a type of herpes virus. The chickenpox virus is technically known as the varicella-zoster virus, and just like its close relative the herpes simplex virus, it becomes a lifelong resident in the body. And like its other cousin, genital herpes, varicella may be silent for many years, hiding out inside nerve cells and can reactivate later, wreaking havoc in the form of the excruciating skin disorder, shingles, which is a blistering, burning skin rash. Unfortunately, or fortunately; depending on whether you chose to get the Covid-19 injection, official Government data and confidential Pfizer documents strongly suggest the Covid-19 injection may be reactivating the dormant chickenpox virus or herpes virus due to the frightening damage it does to the immune system. This means we may not be witnessing a worldwide outbreak of monkeypox at all, but rather a huge cover-up of the consequences of administering an experimental injection to millions of people. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020. But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January. Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website. The latest drop happened on June 1st 2022. One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 21 of the confidential document contains data on adverse events of special interest, with one of these specifically being herpes viral infections. Source According to the document by the end of February 2021, just 2 months after the Pfizer vaccine was granted emergency use authorisation in both the USA and UK, Pfizer has received 8,152 reports relating to herpes infection, and 18 of these had already led to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a systemic, dysfunctional inflammatory response that requires long intensive care unit (ICU) stay. It is characterized with a high mortality rate depending on the number of organs involved. It can be caused by herpes infection as this scientific study found here proves. Further evidence published by the U.S Government, but more specifically the Centers for Disease Control shows that cases of herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome really exploded in the USA following the administration of the Covid-19 injection. The following chart shows the number of herpes infections/complications that have been reported to VAERS as adverse reactions to all vaccines (including the Covid-19 jabs) by the year reported, and the Covid-19 vaccines only by the year reported – Source Data The following chart shows adverse events to the Covid-19 injections reported to the CDC relating to herpes, shingles and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome up to 13th May 2022. It also shows the number of adverse events reported against the Flu Vaccines, all vaccines combined (excluding Covid-19 injections) and the HPV/Smallpox vaccines between 2008 and 2020 – Source Data As you can see the Covid-19 injections have caused the most herpes related infections, and this is within 17 months. When comparing these to the number of flareups reported against the HPV/Smallpox vaccines in 13 years, these numbers are extremely concerning. This isn’t because so many people have been given a Covid-19 injection either. Official CDC numbers actually show 1.7 billion doses of influenza vaccine alone were administered between 2008 and 2020. Whereas, as of 6th May 2022, 580 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine had been administered in the USA. The following chart shows the rate per 1 million doses administered of adverse events related to herpes, shingles and multiple organ syndrome – The rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Flu jabs is 0.75 adverse events per 1 million doses administered. But the rate of herpes-related infections reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections is 31.31 adverse events per 1 million doses administered. That’s a 4,075% difference, and indicative of a very serious problem. A serious problem that is being caused by the fact the Covid-19 injections decimate the immune system. The following chart shows the Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated population in England in the UK Health Security Agency Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13 Vaccine Surveillance reports of 2022 – Data shows that vaccine effectiveness fell month on month, with the lowest effectiveness recorded among 60-69-year-olds at a shocking minus-391%. This age group also experienced the sharpest decline, falling from minus-104.69% in week 3. But one of the more concerning declines in vaccine effectiveness has been recorded among 18-29-year-olds, falling to minus-231% by Week 12 of 2022 from +10.19% in Week 3. A negative vaccine effectiveness indicates immune system damage because vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of the effectiveness of a vaccine. It is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person. The Covid-19 injection specifically instructs cells to produce the alleged SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein. The immune system is supposed to take care of the rest and then remember to do it again if it ever encounters the SARS-CoV-2 virus. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weakens over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time. The following chart shows the Covid-19 death rates per 100,000 by vaccination status across England in March 2022 based on data published by the UKHSA – As you can see, most vaccinated age groups have a higher Covid-19 death rate than the unvaccinated age groups. That’s not indicative of an effective vaccine, it’s indicative of damage done to the immune system by having the Covid vaccine. How else can you explain the fact the vaccinated are more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated? We’re also seeing the same when it comes to non-Covid-19 deaths, and data suggests it takes approximately five months for enough damage to be done to the immune system by the Covid-19 injection for a recipient to be more likely to die. On the 17th May, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published its latest dataset on deaths by vaccination status in England, and it has revealed a whole host of shocking findings. Table 1 of the ONS dataset contains figures on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22. The first Covid-19 injection was administered in England on 8th December 2021, and here are the figures on mortality rates by vaccination status in the following 4 months – The unvaccinated were substantially more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than the vaccinated population in both January and February 2021, before the rates seemed to normalise by the end of April. But look at what happened from May 2021 onwards – All of a sudden, the vaccinated population as a whole were more likely to die than the unvaccinated of any cause other than Covid-19, and this trend has continued month after month since. It also turns out this trend tally’s up with those who received the Covid-19 injections first, with people in England vaccinated by order of age. The ONS data either indicates that the Covid-19 injections take approximately 5 months to completely decimate the immune system to the point where a person’s chances of dying of any cause are significantly increased, or it indicates that the Covid-19 injections are directly killing people in the thousands with a slow and painful death that takes on average 5 months to conclude. So by now, you must be up to speed with the fact that the Covid-19 injections most definitely damage the natural immune system. In which case it’s perfectly plausible that dormant herpes and varicella-zoster viruses are being reactivated resulting in an unprecedented outbreak of herpes and shingles infections. But there’s another condition that authorities could be falsely claiming is monkeypox, and we need to return to the confidential Pfizer documents to find it. The condition is hidden within the 9-page long list of adverse events of special interest at the end of Pfizer’s reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf document. Source Autoimmune blistering disease. Autoimmune blistering disease causes blisters on the skin and mucous membranes throughout the body. It can affect the mouth, nose, throat, eyes, and genitals. It is not fully understood but “experts” believe that it is triggered when a person who has a genetic tendency to get this condition comes into contact with an environmental trigger. This might be a chemical or a medicine. Such as the Pfizer Covid-19 injection? So there you have it, a whole host of evidence that suggests authorities could quite easily be covering up the consequences of Covid-19 vaccination with a fake monkeypox pandemic. But if our display of evidence isn’t enough to convince you of this then perhaps this scientific study published in October 2021 is – Source But even though the whole monkeypox drama might be another charade, don’t be fooled into thinking authorities aren’t willing to take this as far or even further than the miserable two years they have forced the world to suffer in the name of Covid-19. In the UK, the UK Health Security Agency has just made monkeypox a notifiable disease, meaning all doctors and GP’s must report any cases they uncover to the UKHSA. This decision comes on top of the previous advice to isolate at home for three weeks if a close contact of anyone with suspected monkeypox. Meanwhile in the USA the CDC has just announced that the wearing of face masks is now recommended again to “prevent transmission of monkeypox in the community”. We doubt the CDC will ever get the memo that masks simply do not work, but let’s pretend they do and that there really is a monkeypox outbreak. Is the CDC not aware the monkeypox virus is not airborne and only transmitted by physical, and usually intimate contact? And now we have Dr Tedros, the head of the World Health Organization warning that monkeypox is now a real risk, and the WHO is extremely concerned for the safety of children and pregnant women. In a new statement, he finished by stating the WHO will publish a set of guidelines and advice for countries to follow forthwith… You can see where this is going, can’t you? It’s rather obvious where this went, and where it will keep going unless arrests are finally made. Also, today is the last day of the FLASH SALE… VIR-X FLASH SALE: The Most Potent Immune Support Nutraceutical VIR-X FLASH SALE: The Most Potent Immune Support Nutraceutical The new and improved VIR-X formulation offers the most potent synergistic antiviral and anti-Spike Protein (SP1 and SP2) formulation possible. This product also ensures overall wellness, is anti-cancer, and offers powerful antioxidant support. It is manufactured in the best American cGMP facility using the finest ingredients that are rigorously tested … Read full story …so take this opportunity to stock up on lifesaving products like VIR-X, Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Doxycyline and organic full spectrum CBD oil by using code VIRX20. Upon adding products to your cart, please go to the cart icon at the top right corner of your browser page and click it, then choose the VIEW CART option whereby you will be redirected to a page where you can enter the code VIRX20 in the Use Coupon Code field. This flash sale ends this evening, August 20th, 2024. Please contact the company directly with any product questions: [email protected] They want you dead. Do NOT comply. Upgrade to paid Shop 2SG merch Use code 2SGPET for 10% off VIR-X Use code 2SGPET for 10% off PetMectin Use code 2SGPET for 10% off PetDazole Use code 2SGPET for 10% off CBD-X Use code 2SGPET for 10% off FishCycline https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/monkeypox-is-a-coverup-for-damage
    WWW.2NDSMARTESTGUYINTHEWORLD.COM
    Monkeypox is a coverup for damage done to Immune System by COVID Vaccination resulting in Shingles, Autoimmune Blistering Disease & Herpes Infection
    As yet another global scamdemic “emergency” in MonkeyPox, or the rebranded Mpox, was recently announced by the Marxist Ethiopian war criminal, BigPharma bioterrorist, and Bill Gates installed Director-General of the World Health Organization…
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2234 Views
  • The Growth of Mobile App Development Companies in Dubai

    The growth of mobile app development companies in Dubai has transformed the city's digital landscape, making it a hub for tech innovation. These companies offer cutting-edge solutions, from e-commerce to on-demand services, catering to the diverse needs of businesses. With a focus on quality and user experience, Dubai's app development industry is fueling growth, helping brands thrive in a highly competitive digital market.

    to know more visit:-
    https://forbesworlds.com/the-growth-of-mobile-app-development-companies-in-dubai/

    #mobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDubai #appdevelopmentcompanyinUAE #mobileappdevelopmentcompany
    The Growth of Mobile App Development Companies in Dubai The growth of mobile app development companies in Dubai has transformed the city's digital landscape, making it a hub for tech innovation. These companies offer cutting-edge solutions, from e-commerce to on-demand services, catering to the diverse needs of businesses. With a focus on quality and user experience, Dubai's app development industry is fueling growth, helping brands thrive in a highly competitive digital market. to know more visit:- https://forbesworlds.com/the-growth-of-mobile-app-development-companies-in-dubai/ #mobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDubai #appdevelopmentcompanyinUAE #mobileappdevelopmentcompany
    0 Comments 0 Shares 497 Views
  • We are thrilled to present ByteWeb.in, your trusted partner in: https://www.byteweb.in
    Mobile App Development
    Web & Software Development
    E-commerce Development
    Digital Marketing Solutions
    IT Staff Augmentation
    Our team specializes in creating cutting-edge digital experiences that help businesses thrive online. Whether you're a startup looking for the perfect mobile app or an established business in need of web development services, we have you covered!
    Visit us at https://www.byteweb.in/ to learn more about how we can take your business to the next level!
    Let’s build something amazing together! #ByteWeb #TechSolutions #MobileApps #WebDevelopment #DigitalMarketing #ITServices
    We are thrilled to present ByteWeb.in, your trusted partner in: https://www.byteweb.in 📱 Mobile App Development 💻 Web & Software Development 🛒 E-commerce Development 📈 Digital Marketing Solutions 👨‍💻 IT Staff Augmentation Our team specializes in creating cutting-edge digital experiences that help businesses thrive online. Whether you're a startup looking for the perfect mobile app or an established business in need of web development services, we have you covered! Visit us at https://www.byteweb.in/ to learn more about how we can take your business to the next level! 🚀 Let’s build something amazing together! 💼 #ByteWeb #TechSolutions #MobileApps #WebDevelopment #DigitalMarketing #ITServices
    0 Comments 0 Shares 677 Views
  • Mastering VR: How to Develop a Successful Virtual Reality Application from Scratch

    Unlock the potential of VR with "Mastering VR: How to Develop a Successful Virtual Reality Application from Scratch." This comprehensive guide provides essential insights and practical steps for creating immersive virtual reality experiences. Learn how to navigate the complexities of VR development, from initial concept to final product, ensuring your virtual reality application stands out in a competitive market.

    For more info visit:
    https://www.techugo.ca/blog/how-to-develop-a-successful-virtual-reality-application/

    #virtualrealityapplication #appdevelopmentcompany #Canada
    Mastering VR: How to Develop a Successful Virtual Reality Application from Scratch Unlock the potential of VR with "Mastering VR: How to Develop a Successful Virtual Reality Application from Scratch." This comprehensive guide provides essential insights and practical steps for creating immersive virtual reality experiences. Learn how to navigate the complexities of VR development, from initial concept to final product, ensuring your virtual reality application stands out in a competitive market. For more info visit: https://www.techugo.ca/blog/how-to-develop-a-successful-virtual-reality-application/ #virtualrealityapplication #appdevelopmentcompany #Canada
    0 Comments 0 Shares 355 Views
  • Why Flutter App Development Companies Lead the Market

    Flutter app development companies are at the forefront of innovation, offering cross-platform solutions that reduce costs and development time without compromising performance. With a single codebase, businesses can launch apps on Android and iOS simultaneously, ensuring a seamless user experience. The framework's flexibility and vibrant community support empower developers to create high-quality, visually stunning apps that adapt to market demands quickly and efficiently.

    to know more visit:-
    https://tribunaldotrabalho.info/why-flutter-app-development-companies-lead-the-market/

    #Flutterappdevelopmentcompanies #appdevelopmentcompanyinUAE #mobileappdevelopmentcompany

    Why Flutter App Development Companies Lead the Market Flutter app development companies are at the forefront of innovation, offering cross-platform solutions that reduce costs and development time without compromising performance. With a single codebase, businesses can launch apps on Android and iOS simultaneously, ensuring a seamless user experience. The framework's flexibility and vibrant community support empower developers to create high-quality, visually stunning apps that adapt to market demands quickly and efficiently. to know more visit:- https://tribunaldotrabalho.info/why-flutter-app-development-companies-lead-the-market/ #Flutterappdevelopmentcompanies #appdevelopmentcompanyinUAE #mobileappdevelopmentcompany
    0 Comments 0 Shares 669 Views
  • How to Develop an App Like Haraj: Insights into Saudi Arabia's Mobile Market

    Discover the key steps to developing an app like Haraj, a leading online marketplace in Saudi Arabia. This guide delves into the Saudi mobile market, offering valuable insights into user preferences, design considerations, and the latest technological trends. Whether you're a startup or an established business, understanding the local market dynamics is crucial. Learn how to create an app that resonates with Saudi users and stands out in this rapidly growing digital landscape.

    to know more visit:-
    https://www.techugo.com/blog/forging-an-app-like-haraj-insights-into-mobile-app-development-in-saudi-arabia-and-beyond/

    #applikeHaraj #ecommerceappdevelopment #mobileappdevelopmentinSaudiArabia #appappdevelopmentcompany #appdevelopmentcompanyinSaudiArabia #onlinemarketplace

    How to Develop an App Like Haraj: Insights into Saudi Arabia's Mobile Market Discover the key steps to developing an app like Haraj, a leading online marketplace in Saudi Arabia. This guide delves into the Saudi mobile market, offering valuable insights into user preferences, design considerations, and the latest technological trends. Whether you're a startup or an established business, understanding the local market dynamics is crucial. Learn how to create an app that resonates with Saudi users and stands out in this rapidly growing digital landscape. to know more visit:- https://www.techugo.com/blog/forging-an-app-like-haraj-insights-into-mobile-app-development-in-saudi-arabia-and-beyond/ #applikeHaraj #ecommerceappdevelopment #mobileappdevelopmentinSaudiArabia #appappdevelopmentcompany #appdevelopmentcompanyinSaudiArabia #onlinemarketplace
    0 Comments 0 Shares 957 Views
  • Infinite Planner Vault Review | Profit from Planners with PLR Rights | Rebrand it, Resell it, and Keep 100% of the Profits!

    This is My Infinite Planner Vault Review Post, thank you for being with me today. Sales of Canva planners are perhaps one of the most efficient methods of making money within a short period because of the various outlets to market the product to the clients. 71% of traffic to your website, for example, Etsy, Amazon KDP, Shop, Gumroad, Creative Market, ClickBank, and others, comes from people actively looking for planners, which will help increase your sales.


    Read More:
    https://dilip-review.com/infinite-planner-vault-review/


    #HowtoMakeMoneywithInfinitePlannerVault #InfinitePlannerVaultbyVivekSharma #MakeMoneywithInfinitePlannerVault #HowDoesInfinitePlannerVaultWork #InfinitePlannerVaultHonestReview #InfinitePlannerVaultScamorLegit #HowtoBuyInfinitePlannerVault #InfinitePlannerVaultLiveDemo #InfinitePlannerVaultDownload #InfinitePlannerVaultUpgrades #InfinitePlannerVaultSoftware #InfinitePlannerVaultBonuses #InfinitePlannerVaultReviews #InfinitePlannerVaultPreview #InfinitePlannerVaultUpsells #InfinitePlannerVaultReview #InfinitePlannerVaultBonus #InfinitePlannerVaultDemo #InfinitePlannerVaultScam #InfinitePlannerVaultLegit #InfinitePlannerVaultOTO #InfinitePlannerVaultApp #InfinitePlannerVault #Canva #Plr
    Infinite Planner Vault Review | Profit from Planners with PLR Rights | Rebrand it, Resell it, and Keep 100% of the Profits! This is My Infinite Planner Vault Review Post, thank you for being with me today. Sales of Canva planners are perhaps one of the most efficient methods of making money within a short period because of the various outlets to market the product to the clients. 71% of traffic to your website, for example, Etsy, Amazon KDP, Shop, Gumroad, Creative Market, ClickBank, and others, comes from people actively looking for planners, which will help increase your sales. Read More: https://dilip-review.com/infinite-planner-vault-review/ #HowtoMakeMoneywithInfinitePlannerVault #InfinitePlannerVaultbyVivekSharma #MakeMoneywithInfinitePlannerVault #HowDoesInfinitePlannerVaultWork #InfinitePlannerVaultHonestReview #InfinitePlannerVaultScamorLegit #HowtoBuyInfinitePlannerVault #InfinitePlannerVaultLiveDemo #InfinitePlannerVaultDownload #InfinitePlannerVaultUpgrades #InfinitePlannerVaultSoftware #InfinitePlannerVaultBonuses #InfinitePlannerVaultReviews #InfinitePlannerVaultPreview #InfinitePlannerVaultUpsells #InfinitePlannerVaultReview #InfinitePlannerVaultBonus #InfinitePlannerVaultDemo #InfinitePlannerVaultScam #InfinitePlannerVaultLegit #InfinitePlannerVaultOTO #InfinitePlannerVaultApp #InfinitePlannerVault #Canva #Plr
    DILIP-REVIEW.COM
    Infinite Planner Vault Review | Profit from Planners with PLR Rights | Rebrand it, Resell it, and Keep 100% of the Profits!
    Infinite Planner Vault Review - Introducing the Infinite Planner Bundle – a complete package of 200+ editable Canva planner templates covering the
    0 Comments 0 Shares 782 Views
  • Crafting Excellence in the Capital: Best Mobile App Development Company in Delhi

    At the heart of India's bustling capital, we stand as the best mobile app development company in Delhi, dedicated to crafting innovative, user-centric solutions. Our team of expert developers and designers collaborate closely with clients, transforming ideas into functional, high-performance mobile apps. From startups to enterprises, we ensure every project embodies excellence, driving digital success in the competitive Delhi market.

    to know more visit:
    https://www.techugo.com/mobile-app-development-company-delhi

    #mobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi #bestmobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi #topmobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi
    Crafting Excellence in the Capital: Best Mobile App Development Company in Delhi At the heart of India's bustling capital, we stand as the best mobile app development company in Delhi, dedicated to crafting innovative, user-centric solutions. Our team of expert developers and designers collaborate closely with clients, transforming ideas into functional, high-performance mobile apps. From startups to enterprises, we ensure every project embodies excellence, driving digital success in the competitive Delhi market. to know more visit: https://www.techugo.com/mobile-app-development-company-delhi #mobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi #bestmobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi #topmobileappdevelopmentcompanyinDelhi
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1040 Views
  • Effective Optometrist Marketing Strategies | Boost Your Practice's Visibility
    Discover top optometrist marketing strategies to attract more patients and grow your practice. Learn proven techniques to enhance your online presence and drive success.
    #OptometristMarketing #EyeCareMarketing
    #OptometristAdvertising
    Link: https://panelmarketing.ca/optometry-marketing/
    Effective Optometrist Marketing Strategies | Boost Your Practice's Visibility Discover top optometrist marketing strategies to attract more patients and grow your practice. Learn proven techniques to enhance your online presence and drive success. #OptometristMarketing #EyeCareMarketing #OptometristAdvertising Link: https://panelmarketing.ca/optometry-marketing/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 535 Views
  • Creating an Online Marketplace: Essential Strategies for an Etsy-Style Platform

    Discover how to launch an online marketplace like Etsy with "Creating an Online Marketplace: Essential Strategies for an Etsy-Style Platform." This guide offers crucial strategies for designing, launching, and growing a vibrant marketplace tailored to artisans and crafters. Learn how to attract users, manage listings, and build a community, ensuring your platform stands out and thrives.

    For more info visit:
    https://www.techugo.ca/blog/how-to-create-an-online-marketplace-like-etsy/


    #appdevelopmentcompany #canada #ecommerce #onlinemarketplacelikeEsty
    Creating an Online Marketplace: Essential Strategies for an Etsy-Style Platform Discover how to launch an online marketplace like Etsy with "Creating an Online Marketplace: Essential Strategies for an Etsy-Style Platform." This guide offers crucial strategies for designing, launching, and growing a vibrant marketplace tailored to artisans and crafters. Learn how to attract users, manage listings, and build a community, ensuring your platform stands out and thrives. For more info visit: https://www.techugo.ca/blog/how-to-create-an-online-marketplace-like-etsy/ #appdevelopmentcompany #canada #ecommerce #onlinemarketplacelikeEsty
    0 Comments 0 Shares 974 Views
  • Comprehensive Video Production Services in San Antonio

    Description:

    In San Antonio, exceptional video production services are just a call away. Our dedicated team of professionals offers a full range of video production services, tailored to meet the unique needs of businesses, organizations, and individuals in the area. Whether you're looking to create a promotional video, capture a live event, produce a training video, or develop a full-scale commercial, we have the skills and expertise to deliver high-quality results.

    From the initial concept to the final edit, we work closely with our clients to understand their vision and objectives. Our services include pre-production planning, scriptwriting, storyboarding, filming, and post-production editing, ensuring that every aspect of your project is handled with care and precision. We use the latest technology and equipment to produce videos that are not only visually stunning but also effectively communicate your message.

    What makes our video production services stand out in San Antonio is our commitment to personalized service and local expertise. We know the San Antonio market and audience, allowing us to create content that resonates deeply with the community. Our team is passionate about storytelling and dedicated to helping you achieve your goals, whether that's increasing brand awareness, driving sales, or simply telling your story in a compelling way.

    With our video production services, you can expect creativity, professionalism, and a final product that exceeds your expectations. We take pride in delivering videos that make an impact, helping you connect with your audience and stand out in a crowded marketplace. Trust us to bring your vision to life with our comprehensive video production services in San Antonio.
    For more info: https://filmproproduction.com/
    Comprehensive Video Production Services in San Antonio Description: In San Antonio, exceptional video production services are just a call away. Our dedicated team of professionals offers a full range of video production services, tailored to meet the unique needs of businesses, organizations, and individuals in the area. Whether you're looking to create a promotional video, capture a live event, produce a training video, or develop a full-scale commercial, we have the skills and expertise to deliver high-quality results. From the initial concept to the final edit, we work closely with our clients to understand their vision and objectives. Our services include pre-production planning, scriptwriting, storyboarding, filming, and post-production editing, ensuring that every aspect of your project is handled with care and precision. We use the latest technology and equipment to produce videos that are not only visually stunning but also effectively communicate your message. What makes our video production services stand out in San Antonio is our commitment to personalized service and local expertise. We know the San Antonio market and audience, allowing us to create content that resonates deeply with the community. Our team is passionate about storytelling and dedicated to helping you achieve your goals, whether that's increasing brand awareness, driving sales, or simply telling your story in a compelling way. With our video production services, you can expect creativity, professionalism, and a final product that exceeds your expectations. We take pride in delivering videos that make an impact, helping you connect with your audience and stand out in a crowded marketplace. Trust us to bring your vision to life with our comprehensive video production services in San Antonio. For more info: https://filmproproduction.com/
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1035 Views
More Results