Pre-emptive Nuclear War: The Role of Israel in Triggering an Attack on Iran Chapter III of "The Globalization of War" by Michel Chossudovsky Firmly All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name. To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles. Author’s Introduction and Update In a recent article entitled “A Planned US-Israeli Attack on Iran is Contemplated” I focussed on how Israel’s criminal attack on the People of Palestine could evolve towards an extended Middle East War. At the time of writing, US-NATO war ships –including two aircraft carriers, combat planes, not to mention a nuclear submarine– are deployed in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea, all of which are intended to confront what both Western politicians and the media casually describe as “Palestine’s Aggression against the Jewish State”. “Israel ranks” as “the 4th strongest military” after Russia, the U.S and China. Ask yourself: Why on earth would Israel need the support of U.S. aircraft carriers to lead a genocide against the Palestinians who are fighting for their lives with limited military capabilities. Is the U.S. intent upon triggering a broader war? “U.S. Warns Hezbollah, Iran. It Will intervene if they Escalate” Who is “Escalating”? The Pentagon has already intimated that it will attack Iran and Lebanon, “If they Escalate”. Is the Pentagon Seeking to Trigger one or more “False Flags”? Times of Israel, November 9, 2023 Also of significance (less than 4 months prior to October 7, 2023) is the adoption on June 27, 2023 of the US Congress Resolution (H. RES. 559) which Accuses Iran of Possessing Nuclear Weapons. H.RES 559 allows the use of force against Iran, intimating that Iran has Nuclear Weapons. Whereas Iran is tagged (without a shred of evidence) as a Nuclear Power by the U.S. Congress, Washington fails to acknowledge that Israel is an undeclared nuclear power. The article below was first published in my book entitled “The Globalization of War. America’s Long War against Humanity” (2015). I remain indebted to the former Prime Minister of Malaysia Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad who took the initiative of launching my book in Kuala Lumpur. (image right). Firmly committed to “the criminalization of war”, Tun Mahathir is a powerful voice in support of Palestine. The article below (Chapter III of “Globalization of War”) provides analysis in a historical perspective of U.S. war plans directed against Iran. Numerous “war theater scenarios” for an all-out attack on Iran have been contemplated. Dangerous Crossroads in our History The current and ongoing US-NATO military deployment in The Middle East — casually presented by the media as a means to coming to the rescue of Israel– is the pinnacle of U.S. war preparations extending over a period of more than 20 years. Contemplated by the Pentagon in 2005 was a scenario whereby an attack by Israel would be conducted on behalf of Washington: “An attack by Israel could, however, be used as “the trigger mechanism” which would unleash an all-out war against Iran, as well as retaliation by Iran directed against Israel.” (quoted from text below) At the outset of Bush’s second term “Vice President Dick Cheney had hinted, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the “rogue enemies” of America, and that Israel would, so to speak, “be doing the bombing for us” (Ibid) The article also focusses on the dangers of a US-Israel nuclear attack against Iran which has been contemplated by the Pentagon since 2004. The US Israel “Partnership”: “Signed” Military Agreement Amply documented, the U.S. Military and Intelligence apparatus is firmly behind Israel’s genocide. In the words of Lt General Richard Clark: Americans Troops are “prepared to die for the Jewish State”. What should be understood by this statement is that the US and Israel have a longstanding Military “Partnership” as well as (Jerusalem Post) a “Signed” Military Agreement (classified) regarding Israel’s attack on Gaza. Lt. General Richard Clark is U.S. Third Air Force Commander, among the highest-ranking military officers in the U.S. Armed Forces. While he refers to Juniper Cobra, “a joint military exercise that has been conducted for almost a decade”, his statement points to a much broader “signed” military-intelligence agreement (classified) with Israel which no doubt includes the extension of the Israeli-US bombing of Gaza to the broader Middle East. While this so-called “signed” military agreement remains classified (not in the public domain), it would appear that Biden is obeying the orders of the perpetrators of this diabolical military agenda. Does President Biden have the authority (under this “Signed” Agreement with Israel) to save the lives of innocent civilians including the children of Palestine: Q (Inaudible) Gaza ceasefire, Mr. President? THE PRESIDENT: Pardon me? Q What are the chances of a Gaza ceasefire? THE PRESIDENT: None. No possibility. White House Press Conference, November 9, 2023 Lt. General Clark confirms that: “U.S. troops could be put under Israeli commanders in the battlefield”, which suggests that the genocide is implemented by Netanyahu on behalf of the United States. Everything indicates that the US military and intelligence apparatus are behind Israel’s criminal bombing and invasion of Gaza. We stand firmly in Solidarity with Palestine and the People of the Middle East. It is my intent and sincere hope that my writings (including the text below) will contribute to “Revealing the Truth” as well “Reversing the Tide of Global Warfare”. Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, November 17, 2023, March 10, 2024 Pre-emptive Nuclear War: The Role of Israel in Triggering an Attack on Iran by Michel Chossudovsky Introduction While one can conceptualize the loss of life and destruction resulting from present-day wars including Iraq and Afghanistan, it is impossible to fully comprehend the devastation which might result from a Third World War, using “new technologies” and advanced weapons, until it occurs and becomes a reality. The international community has endorsed nuclear war in the name of world peace. “Making the world safer” is the justification for launching a military operation which could potentially result in a nuclear holocaust.” The stockpiling and deployment of advanced weapons systems directed against Iran started in the immediate wake of the 2003 bombing and invasion of Iraq. From the outset, these war plans were led by the U.S. in liaison with NATO and Israel. Following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Bush administration identified Iran and Syria as the next stage of “the road map to war”. U.S. military sources intimated at the time that an aerial attack on Iran could involve a large scale deployment comparable to the U.S. “shock and awe” bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003: American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq.1 “Theater Iran Near Term” (TIRANNT) Code named by U.S. military planners as TIRANNT, “Theater Iran Near Term”, simulations of an attack on Iran were initiated in May 2003 “when modelers and intelligence specialists pulled together the data needed for theater-level (meaning large-scale) scenario analysis for Iran.”2 The scenarios identified several thousand targets inside Iran as part of a “Shock and Awe” Blitzkrieg: The analysis, called TIRANNT, for “Theater Iran Near Term,” was coupled with a mock scenario for a Marine Corps invasion and a simulation of the Iranian missile force. U.S. and British planners conducted a Caspian Sea war game around the same time. And Bush directed the U.S. Strategic Command to draw up a global strike war plan for an attack against Iranian weapons of mass destruction. All of this will ultimately feed into a new war plan for “major combat operations” against Iran that military sources confirm now [April 2006] exists in draft form. … Under TIRANNT, Army and U.S. Central Command planners have been examining both near-term and out-year scenarios for war with Iran, including all aspects of a major combat operation, from mobilization and deployment of forces through postwar stability operations after regime change.3 Different “theater scenarios” for an all-out attack on Iran had been contemplated: The U.S. army, navy, air force and marines have all prepared battle plans and spent four years building bases and training for “Operation Iranian Freedom”. Admiral Fallon, the new head of U.S. Central Command, has inherited computerized plans under the name TIRANNT (Theatre Iran Near Term).4 In 2004, drawing upon the initial war scenarios under TIRANNT, Vice President Dick Cheney instructed U.S. Strategic Command (U.S.STRATCOM) to draw up a “contingency plan” of a large scale military operation directed against Iran “to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States” on the presumption that the government in Tehran would be behind the terrorist plot. The plan included the pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state: The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than four hundred fifty major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program develop- ment sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of ter- rorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing –that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack– but no one is prepared to dam- age his career by posing any objections.5 The Military Road Map: “First Iraq, then Iran” The decision to target Iran under TIRANNT was part of the broader process of military planning and sequencing of military operations. Already under the Clinton administration (1995), U.S. Central Command (U.S.CENTCOM) had formulated “in war theater plans” to invade first Iraq and then Iran. Access to Middle East oil was the stated strategic objective: The broad national security interests and objectives expressed in the President’s National Security Strategy (NSS) and the Chairman’s National Military Strategy (NMS) form the foundation of the United States Central Command’s theater strategy. The NSS directs implementation of a strategy of dual containment of the rogue states of Iraq and Iran as long as those states pose a threat to U.S. interests, to other states in the region, and to their own citizens. Dual containment is designed to maintain the balance of power in the region without depending on either Iraq or Iran. U.S.CENTCOM’s theater strategy is interest-based and threat-focused. The purpose of U.S. engagement, as espoused in the NSS, is to protect the United States’ vital interest in the region – uninterrupted, secure U.S./Allied access to Gulf oil.6 The war on Iran was viewed as part of a succession of military operations. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consisted of a sequence of countries: [The] Five-year campaign plan [includes]… a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.6 (For further details, see Chapter I) The Role of Israel There has been much debate regarding the role of Israel in initiating an attack against Iran. Israel is part of a military alliance. Tel Aviv is not a prime mover. It does not have a separate and distinct military agenda. Israel is integrated into the “war plan for major combat operations” against Iran formulated in 2006 by U.S. Strategic Command (U.S.STRATCOM). In the context of large scale military operations, an uncoordinated unilateral military action by one coalition partner, namely Israel, is from a military and strategic point almost an impossibility. Israel is a de facto member of NATO. Any action by Israel would require a “green light” from Washington. An attack by Israel could, however, be used as “the trigger mechanism” which would unleash an all-out war against Iran, as well as retaliation by Iran directed against Israel. In this regard, there are indications going back to the Bush administration that Washington had indeed contemplated the option of an initial (U.S. backed) attack by Israel rather than an outright U.S.-led military operation directed against Iran. The Israeli attack –although led in close liaison with the Pentagon and NATO– would have been presented to public opinion as a unilateral decision by Tel Aviv. It would then have been used by Washington to justify, in the eyes of World opinion, a military intervention of the U.S. and NATO with a view to “defending Israel”, rather than attacking Iran. Under existing military cooperation agreements, both the U.S. and NATO would be “obligated” to “defend Israel” against Iran and Syria. It is worth noting, in this regard, that at the outset of Bush’s second term, (former) Vice President Dick Cheney had hinted, in no uncertain terms, that Iran was “right at the top of the list” of the “rogue enemies” of America, and that Israel would, so to speak, “be doing the bombing for us”, without U.S. military involvement and without us putting pressure on them “to do it.”8 According to Cheney: One of the concerns people have is that Israel might do it without being asked. …Given the fact that Iran has a stated policy that their objective is the destruction of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first, and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up the diplomatic mess afterwards.9 Commenting the Vice President’s assertion, former National Security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski in an interview on PBS, confirmed with some apprehension, yes: Cheney wants Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to act on America’s behalf and “do it” for us: Iran I think is more ambiguous. And there the issue is certainly not tyranny; it’s nuclear weapons. And the vice president today in a kind of a strange parallel statement to this declaration of freedom hinted that the Israelis may do it and in fact used language which sounds like a justification or even an encouragement for the Israelis to do it.10 What we are dealing with is a process of joint U.S.-NATO-Israel military planning. An operation to bomb Iran has been in the active planning stage since 2004. Officials in the Defense Department, under Bush and Obama, have been working assiduously with their Israeli military and intelligence counterparts, carefully identifying targets inside Iran. In practical military terms, any action by Israel would have to be planned and coordinated at the highest levels of the U.S. led coalition. Israel's Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Vice President Dick Cheney discuss a vision of peace for Israel and Palestine as they conduct a press briefing in Jerusalem, Israel, March 19, 2002. Israel’s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Vice President Dick Cheney discuss a vision of peace for Israel and Palestine as they conduct a press briefing in Jerusalem, Israel, March 19, 2002. “It is our hope that the current violence and terrorism will be replaced by reconciliation and the rebuilding of mutual trust,” said the Vice President. (Source) An attack by Israel against Iran would also require coordinated U.S.-NATO logistical support, particularly with regard to Israel’s air defense system, which since January 2009 is fully integrated into that of the U.S. and NATO.11 Israel’s X band radar system established in early 2009 with U.S. technical support has “integrate[d] Israel’s missile defenses with the U.S. global missile [Space-based] detection network, which includes satellites, Aegis ships on the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf and Red Sea, and land-based Patriot radars and interceptors.”12 What this means is that Washington ultimately calls the shots. The U.S. rather than Israel controls the air defense system: This is and will remain a U.S. radar system,’ Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said. ‘So this is not something we are giving or selling to the Israelis and it is something that will likely require U.S. personnel on-site to operate.13 The U.S. military oversees Israel’s Air Defense system, which is integrated into the Pentagon’s global system. In other words, Israel cannot launch a war against Iran without Washington’s consent. Hence the importance of the so-called “Green Light” legislation in the U.S. Congress sponsored by the Republican party under House Resolution 1553, which explicitly supported an Israeli attack on Iran: The measure, introduced by Texas Republican Louie Gohmert and 46 of his colleagues, endorses Israel’s use of “all means necessary” against Iran “including the use of military force.” … “We’ve got to get this done. We need to show our support for Israel. We need to quit playing games with this critical ally in such a difficult area”.14 In practice, the proposed legislation serves as a “Green Light” to the White House and the Pentagon rather than to Israel. It constitutes a rubber stamp to a U.S. sponsored war on Iran which uses Israel as a convenient military launch pad. It also serves as a justification to wage war with a view to defending Israel. In this context, Israel could indeed provide the pretext to wage war, in response to alleged Hamas or Hezbollah attacks and/or the triggering of hostilities on the border of Israel with Lebanon. What is crucial to understand is that a minor “incident” could be used as a pretext to spark off a major military operation against Iran. Known to U.S. military planners, Israel (rather than the U.S.A) would be the first target of military retaliation by Iran. Broadly speaking, Israelis would be the victims of the machinations of both Washington and their own government. It is, in this regard, absolutely crucial that Israelis forcefully oppose any action by the Netanyahu government to attack Iran. Global Warfare: The Role of U.S. Strategic Command (U.S.STRATCOM) In January 2005, at the outset of the military deployment and build-up directed against Iran, U.S.STRATCOM was identified as “the lead Combatant Command for integration and synchronization of DoD-wide efforts in combating weapons of mass destruction.”15 What this means is that the coordination of a large scale attack on Iran, including the various scenarios of escalation in and beyond the broader Middle East Central Asian region would be coordinated by U.S.STRATCOM. (See Chapter I). Confirmed by military documents as well as official statements, both the U.S. and Israel contemplate the use of nuclear weapons directed against Iran. In 2006, U.S. Strategic Command (U.S.STRATCOM) announced it had achieved an operational capability for rapidly striking targets around the globe using nuclear or conventional weapons. This announcement was made after the conduct of military simulations pertaining to a U.S. led nuclear attack against a fictional country.16 Continuity in Relation to the Bush-Cheney Era President Obama has largely endorsed the doctrine of pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons formulated by the previous administration. Under the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, the Obama administration confirmed “that it is reserving the right to use nuclear weapons against Iran” for its non-compliance with U.S. demands regarding its alleged (nonexistent) nuclear weapons program.17 The Obama administration has also intimated that it would use nukes in the case of an Iranian response to an Israeli attack on Iran. Israel has also drawn up its own “secret plans” to bomb Iran with tactical nuclear weapons: Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.18 Obama’s statements on the use of nuclear weapons against Iran and North Korea are consistent with post-9/11 U.S. nuclear weapons doctrine, which allows for the use of tactical nuclear weapons in the conventional war theater. Through a propaganda campaign which has enlisted the support of “authoritative” nuclear scientists, mini-nukes are upheld as an instrument of peace, namely a means to combating “Islamic terrorism” and instating Western style “democracy” in Iran. The low-yield nukes have been cleared for “battlefield use”. They are slated to be used against Iran and Syria in the next stage of America’s “War on Terrorism” alongside conventional weapons: Administration officials argue that low-yield nuclear weapons are needed as a credible deterrent against rogue states. [Iran, Syria, North Korea] Their logic is that existing nuclear weapons are too destructive to be used except in a full-scale nuclear war. Potential enemies realize this, thus they do not consider the threat of nuclear retaliation to be credible. However, low-yield nuclear weapons are less destructive, thus might conceivably be used. That would make them more effective as a deterrent.19 The preferred nuclear weapon to be used against Iran are tactical nuclear weapons (Made in America), namely bunker buster bombs with nuclear warheads (for example, B61-11), with an explosive capacity between one third to six times a Hiroshima bomb. The B61-11 is the “nuclear version” of the “conventional” BLU 113. or Guided Bomb Unit GBU-28. It can be delivered in much same way as the conventional bunker buster bomb.20 While the U.S. does not contemplate the use of strategic thermonuclear weapons against Iran, Israel’s nuclear arsenal is largely composed of thermonuclear bombs which are deployed and could be used in a war with Iran. Under Israel’s Jericho III missile system with a range between 4,800 km to 6,500 km, all Iran would be within reach. Radioactive Fallout The issue of radioactive fallout and contamination, while casually dismissed by U.S.-NATO military analysts, would be devastating, potentially affecting a large area of the broader Middle East (including Israel) and Central Asian region. In an utterly twisted logic, nuclear weapons are presented as a means to building peace and preventing “collateral damage”. Iran’s nonexistent nuclear weapons are a threat to global security, whereas those of the U.S. and Israel are instruments of peace “harmless to the surrounding civilian population.” “The Mother of All Bombs” (MOAB) Slated to be Used against Iran? Of military significance within the U.S. conventional weapons arsenal is the 21,500-pound “monster weapon” nicknamed the “mother of all bombs” The GBU-43/B or Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb (MOAB) was categorized “as the most powerful non-nuclear weapon ever designed” with the the largest yield in the U.S. conventional arsenal. The MOAB was tested in early March 2003 before being deployed to the Iraq war theater. According to U.S. military sources, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had advised the government of Saddam Hussein prior to launching the 2003 that the “mother of all bombs” was to be used against Iraq. (There were unconfirmed reports that it had been used in Iraq). The U.S. Department of Defense already confirmed in 2009 that it intends to use the “Mother of All Bombs” (MOAB) against Iran. The MOAB is said to be ”ideally suited to hit deeply buried nuclear facilities such as Natanz or Qom in Iran”21. The truth of the matter is that the MOAB, given its explosive capacity, would result in significant civilian casualties. It is a conventional “killing machine” with a nuclear type mushroom cloud. The procurement of four MOABs was commissioned in October 2009 at the hefty cost of $58.4 million, ($14.6 million for each bomb). This amount includes the costs of development and testing as well as integration of the MOAB bombs onto B-2 stealth bombers. This procurement is directly linked to war preparations in relation to Iran. The notification was contained in a ninety-three-page “reprograming memo” which included the following instructions: “The Department has an Urgent Operational Need (UON) for the capability to strike hard and deeply buried targets in high threat environments. The MOAB [Mother of All Bombs] is the weapon of choice to meet the requirements of the UON [Urgent Operational Need].” It further states that the request is endorsed by Pacific Command (which has responsibility over North Korea) and Central Command (which has responsibility over Iran).23 The Pentagon is planning on a process of extensive destruction of Iran’s infrastructure and mass civilian casualties through the combined use of tactical nukes and monster conventional mushroom cloud bombs, including the MOAB and the larger GBU-57A/B or Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), which surpasses the MOAB in terms of explosive capacity. The MOP is described as “a powerful new bomb aimed squarely at the underground nuclear facilities of Iran and North Korea. The gargantuan bomb–longer than eleven persons standing shoulder-to-shoulder or more than twenty feet base to nose”.24 These are WMDs in the true sense of the word. The not so hidden objective of the MOAB and MOP, including the American nickname used to casually describe the MOAB (“Mother of all Bombs”), is “mass destruction” and mass civilian casualties with a view to instilling fear and despair. State of the Art Weaponry: “War Made Possible Through New Technologies” The process of U.S. military decision making in relation to Iran is supported by Star Wars, the militarization of outer space and the revolution in communications and information systems. Given the advances in military technology and the development of new weapons systems, an attack on Iran could be significantly different in terms of the mix of weapons systems, when compared to the March 2003 Blitzkrieg launched against Iraq. The Iran operation is slated to use the most advanced weapons systems in support of its aerial attacks. In all likelihood, new weapons systems will be tested. The 2000 Project for the New American Century (PNAC) document entitled Rebuilding American Defenses, outlined the mandate of the U.S. military in terms of large scale theater wars, to be waged simultaneously in different regions of the World: “Fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars”. (See Chapter I) This formulation is tantamount to a global war of conquest by a single imperial superpower. The PNAC document also called for the transformation of U.S. forces to exploit the “revolution in military affairs”, namely the implementation of “war made possible through new technologies”.25 The latter consists in developing and perfecting a state of the art global killing machine based on an arsenal of sophisticated new weaponry, which would eventually replace the existing paradigms. Thus, it can be foreseen that the process of transformation will in fact be a two-stage process: first of transition, then of more thoroughgoing transformation. The breakpoint will come when a preponderance of new weapons systems begins to enter service, perhaps when, for example, unmanned aerial vehicles begin to be as numerous as manned aircraft. In this regard, the Pentagon should be very wary of making large investments in new programs –tanks, planes, aircraft carriers, for example– that would commit U.S. forces to current paradigms of warfare for many decades to come.26 The war on Iran could indeed mark this crucial break-point, with new space-based weapons systems being applied with a view to disabling an enemy which has significant conventional military capabilities including more than half a million ground forces. Electromagnetic Weapons Electromagnetic weapons could be used to destabilize Iran’s communications systems, disable electric power generation, undermine and destabilize command and control, government infrastructure, transportation, energy, etc. Within the same family of weapons, environmental modifications techniques (ENMOD) (weather warfare) developed under the HAARP program could also be applied.27 These weapons systems are fully operational. In this context, the U.S. Air Force document AF 2025 explicitly acknowledged the military applications of weather modification technologies: Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally. … It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, improve communications through ionospheric modification (the use of ionospheric mirrors), and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in U.S., or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power.28 Electromagnetic radiation enabling “remote health impairment” might also be envisaged in the war theater.29 In turn, new uses of biological weapons by the U.S. military might also be envisaged as suggested by the PNAC: “[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare that can ‘target’ specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.”30 Iran’s Military Capabilities: Medium and Long-range Missiles Iran has advanced military capabilities, including medium and long-range missiles capable of reaching targets in Israel and the Gulf States. Hence the emphasis by the U.S.-NATO Israel alliance on the use of nuclear weapons, which are slated to be used either pre-emptively or in response to an Iranian retaliatory missile attack. In November 2006, Iran tests of surface missiles two were marked by precise planning in a carefully staged operation. According to a senior American missile expert, “the Iranians demonstrated up-to-date missile-launching technology which the West had not known them to possess.”31 Israel acknowledged that “the Shehab-3, whose 2,000-km range brings Israel, the Middle East and Europe within reach”.32 According to Uzi Rubin, former head of Israel’s anti-ballistic missile program, “the intensity of the military exercise was unprecedented… It was meant to make an impression – and it made an impression.”33 The 2006 exercises, while creating a political stir in the U.S. and Israel, did not in any way modify U.S.-NATO-Israeli resolve to wage war on Iran. Tehran has confirmed in several statements that it will respond if it is attacked. Israel would be the immediate object of Iranian missile attacks as confirmed by the Iranian government. The issue of Israel’s air defense system is therefore crucial. U.S. and allied military facilities in the Gulf states, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iraq could also be targeted by Iran. Iran’s Ground Forces While Iran is encircled by U.S. and allied military bases, the Islamic Republic has significant military capabilities. What is important to acknowledge is the sheer size of Iranian forces in terms of personnel (army, navy, air force) when compared to U.S. and NATO forces serving in Afghanistan and Iraq. Confronted with a well-organized insurgency, coalition forces are already overstretched in both Afghanistan and Iraq. Would these forces be able to cope if Iranian ground forces were to enter the existing battlefield in Iraq and Afghanistan? The potential of the Resistance movement to U.S. and allied occupation would inevitably be affected. Iranian ground forces are of the order of 700,000 of which 130,000 are professional soldiers, 220,000 are conscripts and 350,000 are reservists.34 There are 18,000 personnel in Iran’s Navy and 52,000 in the Air Force. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, “the Revolutionary Guards has an estimated 125,000 personnel in five branches: Its own Navy, Air Force, and Ground Forces; and the Quds Force (Special Forces).” According to the CISS, Iran’s Basij paramilitary volunteer force controlled by the Revolu- tionary Guards “has an estimated 90,000 active-duty full-time uniformed members, 300,000 reservists, and a total of 11 million men that can be mobilized if need be”35, In other words, Iran can mobilize up to half a million regular troops and several million militia. Its Quds special forces are already operating inside Iraq. U.S. Military and Allied Facilities Surrounding Iran For several years now, Iran has been conducting its own war drills and exercises. While its Air Force has weaknesses, its intermediate and long-range missiles are fully operational. Iran’s military is in a state of readiness. Iranian troop concentrations are currently within a few kilometers of the Iraqi and Afghan borders, and within proximity of Kuwait. The Iranian Navy is deployed in the Persian Gulf within proximity of U.S. and allied military facilities in the United Arab Emirates. It is worth noting that in response to Iran’s military build-up, the U.S. has been transferring large amounts of weapons to its non-NATO allies in the Persian Gulf including Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. While Iran’s advanced weapons do not measure up to those of the U.S. and NATO, Iranian forces would be in a position to inflict substantial losses to coalition forces in a conventional war theater, on the ground in Iraq or Afghanistan. Iranian ground troops and tanks in December 2009 crossed the border into Iraq without being confronted or challenged by allied forces and occupied a disputed territory in the East Maysan oil field. Even in the event of an effective Blitzkrieg, which targets Iran’s military facilities, its communications systems etc., through massive aerial bombing, using cruise missiles, conventional bunker buster bombs and tactical nuclear weapons, a war with Iran, once initiated, could eventually lead into a ground war. This is something which U.S. military planners have no doubt contemplated in their simulated war scenarios. An operation of this nature would result in significant military and civilian casualties, particularly if nuclear weapons are used. Within a scenario of escalation, Iranian troops could cross the border into Iraq and Afghanistan. In turn, military escalation using nuclear weapons could lead us into a World War III scenario, extending beyond the Middle-East – Central Asian region. In a very real sense, this military project, which has been on the Pentagon’s drawing board for more than ten years, threatens the future of humanity. Our focus in this chapter has been on war preparations. The fact that war preparations are in an advanced state of readiness does not imply that these war plans will be carried out. The U.S.-NATO-Israel alliance realizes that the enemy has significant capabilities to respond and retaliate. This factor in itself has been crucial in the decision by the U.S. and its allies to postpone an attack on Iran. Another crucial factor is the structure of military alliances. Whereas NATO has become a formidable force, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which constitutes an alliance between Russia and China and a number of former Soviet Republics has been significantly weakened. The ongoing U.S. military threats directed against China and Russia are intended to weaken the SCO and discourage any form of military action on the part of Iran’s allies in the case of a U.S. NATO Israeli attack. Video Interview: Michel Chossudovsky and Caroline Mailloux November 2023 Interview Notes 1. See Target Iran – Air Strikes, Globalsecurity.org, undated. 2. William Arkin, Washington Post, April 16, 2006. 3. Ibid. 4. New Statesman, February 19, 2007. 5. Philip Giraldi, Deep Background,The American Conservative August 2005. 6. U.S.CENTCOM, http://www.milnet.com/milnet/pentagon/centcom/chap1/stratgic.htm#U.S.Policy, link no longer active, archived at http://tinyurl.com/37gafu9. 7. General Wesley Clark, for further details see Chapter I. 8. See Michel Chossudovsky, Planned U.S.-Israeli Attack on Iran, Global Research, May 1, 2005. 9. Dick Cheney, quoted from an MSNBC Interview, January 2005. 10. According to Zbigniew Brzezinski. 11. Michel Chossudovsky, Unusually Large U.S. Weapons Shipment to Israel: Are the U.S. and Israel Planning a Broader Middle East War? Global Research, January 11, 2009. 12. Defense Talk.com, January 6, 2009. 13. Quoted in Israel National News, January 9, 2009. 14. Webster Tarpley, Fidel Castro Warns of Imminent Nuclear War; Admiral Mullen Threatens Iran; U.S.-Israel versus Iran-Hezbollah Confrontation Builds On, Global Research, August 10, 2010. 15. Michel Chossudovsky, Nuclear War against Iran, Global Research, January 3, 2006. 16. David Ruppe, Pre-emptive Nuclear War in a State of Readiness: U.S. Command Declares Global Strike Ca- pability, Global Security Newswire, December 2, 2005. 17. U.S. Nuclear Option on Iran Linked to Israeli Attack Threat – IPS ipsnews.net, April 23, 2010. 18. Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran – Times Online, January 7, 2007. 19. Opponents Surprised By Elimination of Nuke Research Funds, Defense News, November 29, 2004. 20. See Michel Chossudovsky, “Tactical Nuclear Weapons” against Afghanistan?, Global Research, December 5, 2001. See also http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=jf03norris. 21. Jonathan Karl, Is the U.S. Preparing to Bomb Iran? ABC News, October 9, 2009. 22. Ibid. 23. ABC News, op cit, emphasis added. To consult the reprogramming request (pdf) click here. 24. See Edwin Black, “Super Bunker-Buster Bombs Fast-Tracked for Possible Use Against Iran and North Korea Nuclear Programs”, Cutting Edge, September 21, 2009. 25. See Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America’s Defenses Washington DC, September 2000, pdf. 26. Ibid, emphasis added. 27. See Michel Chossudovsky, “Owning the Weather” for Military Use, Global Research, September 27, 2004. 28. Air Force 2025 Final Report, See also U.S. Air Force: Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, AF2025 v3c15-1. 29. See Mojmir Babacek, Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons:, Global Research, August 6, 2004. 30. Project for a New American Century, op cit., p. 60. 31. See Michel Chossudovsky, Iran’s “Power of Deterrence” Global Research, November 5, 2006. 32. Debka, November 5, 2006. 33. www.cnsnews.com November 3, 2006. 34. See Islamic Republic of Iran Army – Wikipedia. Featured image is from The Libertarian Institute The Globalization of War: America’s “Long War” against Humanity Michel Chossudovsky The “globalization of war” is a hegemonic project. Major military and covert intelligence operations are being undertaken simultaneously in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia and the Far East. The U.S. military agenda combines both major theater operations as well as covert actions geared towards destabilizing sovereign states. ISBN Number: 978-0-9879389-0-9 Year: 2015 Pages: 240 Pages Price: $9.40 Click here to order. Related Articles from our Archives https://www.globalresearch.ca/pre-emptive-nuclear-war-the-role-of-israel-in-triggering-an-attack-on-iran/5840256 https://telegra.ph/Nuclear-war-03-10

Politicians come and go, but the elite are permanent in Malaysia Too powerful to overcome Murray Hunter Kuala Lumpur Itinerary : A Guide to the Perfect Five-Day Trip in KL Share Governments do change in Malaysia. Each incoming administration will have its own narratives and specific agendas. However, policies will be generally very similar, and based upon the same principles as the previous government. In and around the executive and administrative government is a network of elite people, who collectively yield massive power. The actors can be seen in GLCs, corporations, royal households, civil servants, the judiciary, police, and within the executive itself. This massive power is however, hidden due to its fragmentation, and unseen influence its membership carries. The Elite consolidate Malay power While politicians come and go, the elites are permanent, exercising both formal and informal influence. Together, the elite permeates across all society in all states and territories. There is an established elite in Penang, Sarawak, and Sabah. They act independently and in conjunction with the rest of the nation’s class of elites. Sometimes groups within the elite work together, and sometimes they oppose each other. ไฟล์:Flag of the Federated Malay States (1895 - 1946).png ... The real symbol of elite power No matter who is in power, the interwoven network of the elite is there. Governments must work in cooperation with these elites, or be seriously undermined. As we can see monopolies and concessions continue to flourish no matter which political grouping is in power. Major contracts are still dished out by direct negotiation, rather than open tender. Annual budgets and five-year plans still deliver ‘crafted opportunities’ to these groups, cementing crony capitalism and kleptocracy in Malaysia as a way of life. No administration will tax the Top 10 percent of income earners in the country. The power of the prime minister is only as strong as the relationships he carries with sections of the elite. Networks control corporate Malaysia Today’s public policy initiatives are implemented through government linked companies (GLCs) and partnerships with corporations. Thus, the running of government is concerned about business deals and contracts to business vehicles owned by the elite. This is why the Malaysian economy is so heavily dependent upon GLCs and crony corporations, which have been granted artificial monopolies. The only way someone can become a member of this exclusive group is to have strong connections with various stakeholders within the elite class. This is why new entrants strive to find ‘God fathers’ within the GLCs that employ them, and politicians seek to be appointed to agency and GLC boards. Some powerful people are members of multiple public corporation boards, and also on the boards of agencies and GLCs. Their networking potential is vast, where through informal relationship, much can be achieved to achieve their own ends. Much of elite networking with the government decision makers of the day, carries massive persuasion. Sometimes this persuasion is too powerful for government decision makers to refuse. Those activists, journalists, and NGOs who criticise what the elites do is dealt with through lawfare, humiliation through the media and even arrest by the police. Defamation actions are taken to drain the financial resources of activists to make them bankrupt, in order to silence them. Some just disappear all-together. The privileged elite are generally immune from the law, investigation by the politicised police, and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). This network controls and defines the law. The elite live by the creed ‘greed is good’ They look after the interests of their own, using tools like the New Economic Policy (NEP), at the cost of the rest of Malaysians. After 60 years of the NEP most of the most marginalised people in Malaysia are Bumiputeras. The NEP concerns itself with equity within the economy, and not income, so the KPIs are skewed. The primary objective of the elite is to pursue ‘created opportunities’ to make money. This is why the Malaysian economy today is primarily based upon rent-seeking activities and not innovation. The elite take few risks. There was no indigenous Malaysian vaccine created during the Covid-19 pandemic, even though the government spent great sums of money promoting a biotechnology sector. Rather than local companies gearing up to produce parts for the local production of indigenous electric vehicles (EVs), most are facing financial difficulties and heading towards bankruptcy. These are just two examples of the rent-seeking Malaysian economy today. All countries have their own elites, where Malaysia is no exception. The elites form a strong component of the nature of the real-politic of the nation. Subscribe Below: https://open.substack.com/pub/murrayhunter/p/politicians-come-and-go-but-the-elite?r=29hg4d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web https://youtu.be/VVxYOQS6ggk

Tiada keperluan wajibkan dos penggalak COVID-19 Gambar hiasan Gambar hiasan KUALA LUMPUR: Tiada keperluan untuk mewajibkan dos penggalak vaksin COVID-19 berikutan kebanyakan kes jangkitan virus itu ketika ini adalah bergejala ringan. Presiden Persatuan Perubatan Malaysia (MMA), Dr Azizan Abdul Aziz, berkata individu sihat boleh pulih dengan pengambilan ubat dan berehat. Bagaimanapun, katanya, amat penting untuk kumpulan berisiko tinggi mengambil dos penggalak bagi melindungi mereka daripada gejala yang lebih teruk. "Pengambilan dos penggalak yang disyorkan mengikut jadual adalah digalakkan berikutan kesan vaksin semakin berkurangan dari semasa ke semasa," katanya kepada BH, hari ini. Beliau ditanya sama ada dos penggalak perlu diwajibkan, terutama kepada golongan berisiko berikutan kes COVID-19 yang meningkat ketika ini. Pada 14 Disember lalu, Menteri Kesihatan, Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad berkata, Kementerian Kesihatan (KKM) menggalakkan pengambilan dos penggalak, terutama bagi golongan rentan dan berisiko tinggi, selain ia berkesan melindungi orang ramai daripada jangkitan mutasi dan strain baharu COVID-19. Selain itu, Dr Azizan berkata, golongan perokok perlu mempertimbang untuk menghentikan tabiat itu jika bimbang mengenai COVID-19 kerana merokok, yang boleh memberi kesan kepada paru-paru dan organ lain, boleh menyebabkan seseorang lebih terdedah kepada virus berkenaan. "Kita juga menasihatkan masyarakat supaya mengambil langkah mempertingkat sistem imun mereka dengan pengambilan diet seimbang, rehat berkualiti yang mencukupi dan sering bersenam. "Langkah mendapatkan Vitamin D yang mencukupi secara semula jadi melalui pendedahan kepada cahaya matahari juga penting dalam meningkatkan sistem imun. "Perkara asas ini, jika tidak diberi perhatian boleh menjejaskan sistem imun yang menjadi pertahanan semula jadi tubuh terhadap virus dan bakteria, selain meredakan tekanan yang mempunyai kesan positif terhadap sistem imun," katanya. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2023/12/1190766/tiada-keperluan-wajibkan-dos-penggalak-covid-19

SPRM beku 41 akaun Aman Palestin RM15 juta, siasat penyelewengan RM70 juta SPRM bekukan 41 akaun bank syarikat pertubuhan amal itu dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam SPRM bekukan 41 akaun bank syarikat pertubuhan amal itu dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam KUALA LUMPUR: Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) membekukan 41 akaun Aman Palestin Bhd (Aman Palestin) dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain yang berkaitan dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam. Ia berhubung siasatan agensi penguatkuasaan itu terhadap dakwaan syarikat pertubuhan amal berkenaan menyalahgunakan wang sumbangan orang ramai sejak 17 Oktober lalu. SPRM dalam kenyataan hari ini berkata, pihaknya juga merakam beberapa keterangan saksi penting dan hasil siasatan awal mengenal pasti beberapa isu membabitkan penyelewengan dana dianggarkan berjumlah RM70 juta yang disalurkan bagi tujuan selain objektif penubuhan syarikat berkenaan. "Sebelum ini, SPRM membuat penggeledahan di premis Aman Palestin serta memperoleh dokumen berkaitan kewangan dan pengurusan operasi bagi tempoh lima tahun terdahulu. "Siasatan dijalankan bagi mendapatkan keterangan berhubung kesalahan mengikut Akta SPRM 2009, Akta Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram, Pencegahan Pembiayaan Keganasan dan Hasil Daripada Aktiviti Haram 2001 (AMLATFPUAA 2001) dan Kanun Keseksaan (Akta 574)," katanya. Pada 7 November lalu, SPRM dilaporkan masih belum memanggil mana-mana saksi berhubung siasatan terhadap Aman Palestin yang mengutip derma untuk rakyat negara berkenaan. Ketua Pesuruhjaya SPRM, Tan Sri Azam Baki, dipetik berkata ketika ini siasatan masih berjalan dan pegawai forensik agensi itu sedang meneliti dokumen membabitkan kewangan syarikat berkenaan. Media melaporkan SPRM memulakan siasatan ke atas Aman Palestin berhubung aktiviti pengumpulan derma untuk rakyat Palestin susulan tindakan Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Perlis (JAIPs) menarik balik kebenaran untuk syarikat itu membuat kutipan bagi tujuan berkenaan. Ia apabila ada aduan beberapa pihak yang meminta Aman Palestin disiasat berkaitan wang dipungut dan dikumpulkan selama ini. SPRM mempunyai kuasa untuk memulakan siasatan berdasarkan maklumat yang diterbitkan media. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2023/11/1180527/sprm-beku-akaun-aman-palestin

SPRM beku 41 akaun Aman Palestin RM15 juta, siasat penyelewengan RM70 juta SPRM bekukan 41 akaun bank syarikat pertubuhan amal itu dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam SPRM bekukan 41 akaun bank syarikat pertubuhan amal itu dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam KUALA LUMPUR: Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) membekukan 41 akaun Aman Palestin Bhd (Aman Palestin) dan beberapa entiti syarikat lain yang berkaitan dengan jumlah keseluruhan RM15,868,762.00, semalam. Ia berhubung siasatan agensi penguatkuasaan itu terhadap dakwaan syarikat pertubuhan amal berkenaan menyalahgunakan wang sumbangan orang ramai sejak 17 Oktober lalu. SPRM dalam kenyataan hari ini berkata, pihaknya juga merakam beberapa keterangan saksi penting dan hasil siasatan awal mengenal pasti beberapa isu membabitkan penyelewengan dana dianggarkan berjumlah RM70 juta yang disalurkan bagi tujuan selain objektif penubuhan syarikat berkenaan. "Sebelum ini, SPRM membuat penggeledahan di premis Aman Palestin serta memperoleh dokumen berkaitan kewangan dan pengurusan operasi bagi tempoh lima tahun terdahulu. "Siasatan dijalankan bagi mendapatkan keterangan berhubung kesalahan mengikut Akta SPRM 2009, Akta Pencegahan Pengubahan Wang Haram, Pencegahan Pembiayaan Keganasan dan Hasil Daripada Aktiviti Haram 2001 (AMLATFPUAA 2001) dan Kanun Keseksaan (Akta 574)," katanya. Pada 7 November lalu, SPRM dilaporkan masih belum memanggil mana-mana saksi berhubung siasatan terhadap Aman Palestin yang mengutip derma untuk rakyat negara berkenaan. Ketua Pesuruhjaya SPRM, Tan Sri Azam Baki, dipetik berkata ketika ini siasatan masih berjalan dan pegawai forensik agensi itu sedang meneliti dokumen membabitkan kewangan syarikat berkenaan. Media melaporkan SPRM memulakan siasatan ke atas Aman Palestin berhubung aktiviti pengumpulan derma untuk rakyat Palestin susulan tindakan Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Perlis (JAIPs) menarik balik kebenaran untuk syarikat itu membuat kutipan bagi tujuan berkenaan. Ia apabila ada aduan beberapa pihak yang meminta Aman Palestin disiasat berkaitan wang dipungut dan dikumpulkan selama ini. SPRM mempunyai kuasa untuk memulakan siasatan berdasarkan maklumat yang diterbitkan media. https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/nasional/2023/11/1180527/sprm-beku-41-akaun-aman-palestin-rm15-juta-siasat-penyelewengan-rm70

Penubuhan sekolah vernakular sah, boleh tutur bahasa Mandarin, Tamil Sinar Harian Sinar Harian November 23, 2023 02:45 MYT Penubuhan sekolah vernakular sah, boleh tutur bahasa Mandarin, Tamil Mahkamah Rayuan pada Khamis memutuskan penubuhan sekolah vernakular adalah sah dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan. - Gambar fail PUTRAJAYA : Mahkamah Rayuan di sini pada Khamis memutuskan penubuhan sekolah vernakular yang menggunakan bahasa Mandarin dan Tamil sebagai bahasa pengantar adalah sah dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Panel tiga hakim diketuai Datuk Supang Lian yang bersidang bersama Datuk M Gunalan dan Datuk Azizul Azmi Adnan sebulat suara memutuskan demikian selepas menolak rayuan difailkan empat pertubuhan bukan kerajaan (NGO). Mereka ialah Ikatan Guru-Guru Muslim Malaysia (i-Guru), Majlis Pembangunan Pendidikan Islam (Mappim), Gabungan Persatuan Penulis Malaysia (Gapena) dan Ikatan Muslimin Malaysia (Isma). Pada Disember 2019, lima NGO iaitu Gabungan Pelajar Melayu Semenanjung (GPMS), Mappim, Gapena dan Isma memfailkan saman terhadap 13 pihak antaranya kerajaan Malaysia, kumpulan pendidik Cina Dong Zong dan Jiao Zong, Persatuan Thamizhar Malaysia serta Persatuan Tamilar Thurunal (Perak). I-Guru pula menamakan Menteri Pendidikan dan kerajaan Malaysia, memohon deklarasi bahawa Seksyen 17 serta Seksyen 28 Akta Pendidikan 1996 adalah tidak konsisten dengan Perkara 152 Perlembagaan Persekutuan, maka ia perlu dibatalkan. NGO-NGO itu mencabar keabsahan sekolah vernakular dan menyatakan penggunaan bahasa Mandarin serta Tamil sebagai bahasa perantaraan utama di sekolah vernakular adalah bercanggah dengan Perkara 152 Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Majlis Bahasa Cina Malaysia, Persatuan Tamil Neri Malaysia, Gabungan Persatuan Bekas Pelajar Sekolah Tamil Malaysia, MCA dan Persekutuan Persatuan-Persatuan Lembaga Pengurus Sekolah Cina Malaysia (Dong Zong) telah dibenarkan mencelah dalam saman yang difailkan oleh I-Guru. Pada 29 Disember 2021, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi, Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali (kini Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan) menolak saman GPMS, Mappim, Gapena and Isma. Mohd Nazlan memutuskan bahawa kewujudan dan penubuhan sekolah vernakular serta penggunaan bahasa Mandarin dan Tamil di sekolah terbabit adalah sah serta berperlembagaan. Pada 29 Mei tahun lepas, Pesuruhjaya Kehakiman, Abazafree Mohd Abbas (kini Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi) turut memutuskan bahawa kewujudan sekolah vernakular adalah sah dan berperlembagaan ketika beliau menolak saman I-Guru. Pada Disember 2021 dan Mei 2022, Mappim, Gapena, Isma dan I-Guru merayu terhadap keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur dan Kota Bharu yang menolak saman mereka. Bagaimanapun, hanya GPMS tidak memfailkan rayuan. Semasa hujahan prosiding rayuan itu, peguam kanan Persekutuan, Liew Horng Bin, mewakili Menteri Pendidikan dan kerajaan berhujah bahawa penggunaan bahasa lain sebagai bahasa pengantar di sekolah rendah vernakular tidak bercanggah dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan kerana bahasa kebangsaan diajar sebagai mata pelajaran wajib di sekolah terbabit. Peguam, Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, yang mewakili Mappim dan Gapena dalam hujahan balasnya berkata, disebabkan pendidikan merupakan urusan rasmi, maka penggunaan bahasa sebagai medium pengajaran wajiblah dalam bahasa Melayu. Katanya, Mohd Nazlan terkhilaf apabila memutuskan penggunaan bahasa Mandarin dan Tamil sebagai bahasa pengantar di sekolah vernakular adalah sah dan berperlembagaan. - https://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/penubuhan-sekolah-vernakular-sah-boleh-tutur-bahasa-mandarin-tamil-447164?amp=1

Nikmati 'daging' berasaskan tumbuhan keluaran GoodMorning Nikmati 'daging' berasaskan tumbuhan keluaran GoodMorning KUALA LUMPUR : Orang ramai kini boleh menikmati rasa 'daging' berasaskan tumbuhan yang bernutrisi lengkap dalam bentuk campuran kering yang pertama di Malaysia apabila apabila syarikat pemakanan multi-bijirin terbesar tempatan, GoodMorning Global Group Holdings Berhad melancarkan produk WonderMeat. Menariknya, Pengerusi Eksekutif dan Pengasasnya, Datuk Dr Lim Sin Boon memberitahu, WonderMeat yang merupakan sebuah produk inovatif bioteknologi buatan tempatan itu mempunyai nutrisi yang lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan daging haiwan. “Bukan sahaja membuka peluang dan memberi pilihan kepada pengamal vegan untuk menikmati rasa daging berasaskan tumbuhan yang bernutrisi lengkap, tetapi ia juga akan membawa perubahan trend pengguna mengambil sumber protein dari haiwan ke tumbuhan,” katanya pada majlis pelancaran WonderMeat di sini, pada Khamis. Dengan itu Sin Boon menjangkakan pelancaran itu akan memenuhi permintaan global yang semakin meningkat kepada penggemar makanan berasaskan tumbuhan. Menurutnya, WonderMeat bukan sekadar produk makanan, malah bakal menjadi satu lonjakan ke arah masa depan yang mampan. "Kami percaya bahawa teknologi makanan mempunyai potensi yang tidak terhad dan membuka jalan bagi kehidupan yang lebih sihat dan lebih lengkap," ujarnya. Sin Boon menambah, komitmen syarikat tersebut terhadap kesejahteraan kesihatan itu membawa kepada penciptaan pengalaman kulinari yang lazat dan mampu milik yang menyediakan protein berasaskan tumbuhan dengan pemakanan yang mencukupi dan seimbang untuk keperluan harian semua. "Daging berasaskan tumbuhan yang dibangunkan untuk meniru rasa dan tekstur daging haiwan ini bukan sahaja memberi para pengamal vegetarian dan vegan dengan opsyen yang lebih luas dalam pilihan makanan, malah pada masa sama dilihat sebagai satu perubahan yang secara asasnya akan mengubah cara orang melihat daging dengan menukar industri daging kepada industri yang berasaskan tumbuhan. "Jadi, dengan ini ia akan mengurangkan kebergantungan kepada protein haiwan untuk mencapai keselamatan makanan dan matlamat iklim. Beliau memberitahu, dengan adanya keupayaan logistik yang sentiasa diperkemas, hayat simpan produk tersebut menjadi lebih lama. "Kos serta jejak karbon yang lebih rendah, serbuk WonderMeat mengubah industri makanan untuk menjadi lebih mampan," tambahnya. Sin Boon menambah, dengan tekstur daging yang asli dengan harga mampu milik, produk itu menyaksikan era baharu dalam inovasi kulinari. WonderMeat diperbuat daripada soya dan kacang pis serta kaya dengan serat makanan dan protein. Ia juga diperkaya dengan nutrisi tambahan Calcium 3-hydroxy-3-methyl butyrate monohydrate (CaHMB), yang menyokong pembinaan tisu serta 28 jenis vitamin dan mineral terutamanya Vitamin B12 dan D yang susah dapat dalam diet vegan bagi memastikan pemakanan yang lengkap dalam setiap hidangan. Nikmati daging berasaskan tumbuhan keluaran GoodMorning Pada Julai lalu, syarikat berkenaan memperoleh dana sebanyak RM20 juta (AS$4.4 juta) daripada 1,046 pelabur dalam kempen pendanaan ramai ekuiti untuk memacu penyelidikan bioteknologi dan teknologi makanan syarikat ke peringkat yang lebih jauh lagi. Bersesuaian dengan kempen Tiada Siapa Berlapar Sebelum Tidur. Produk GoodMorning turut melancarkan pakej GoodMorning Rahmah. Inisiatif itu adalah bertujuan untuk menggalakkan masyarakat dapat nutrisi dan diet seimbang. Sementara itu, minuman pemakanan berasaskan tumbuhan GSure keluaran syarikat telah mendapat kelulusan Pusat Keselamatan dan Kualiti Makanan Kesultanan Oman pada Mac lalu. Sementara itu, Ahli Parlimen Kluang, Wong Shu Qi, yang menyempurnakan majlis tersebut yakin, produk protein yang menjadi alternatif itu dapat bersaing dalam pasaran global dengan jenama-jenama lain, seterusnya memberi inspirasi kepada pembangunan makanan berasasakan tumbuhan. https://www.astroawani.com/berita-bisnes/nikmati-daging-berasaskan-tumbuhan-keluaran-goodmorning-446759

THE HIDDEN HAND OF THE “NEW WORLD ORDER” Summary Observations and History THE HAND OF IBLIS An Anatomy of Evil SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS ON THE HIDDEN HAND OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER © 2008 Omar Zaid M.D. Original unrevised manuscript prior to hardcopy publication Dec 09 Published online by Author Dec 09 All Rights Reserved [email protected] or [email protected] Ph: +60176192159 Hardcopy Available A.S. NOORDEEN, P.O. Box 42 - Gombak, 53800 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. T: +603-40236003 F: +603-40213675 [email protected], [email protected] Pub Nov. 2009; ISBN 978-983-065-295-5 For My Children Melissa, Iain, Sarah, Kirsti, Lauren Karlenna, Josiah, Jeremiah, Syamila And Insha’Allah, those to come

https://open.substack.com/pub/murrayhunter/p/syed-saddiqs-sentencing-is-just-too?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post Syed Saddiq’s sentencing is just too convenient Eliminate your enemy by any means (Malay Machiavellian playbook) Murray Hunter With the attack on Bersatu underway, the sentencing of Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman became a side-show. Seven years jail, RM 10 million fine, and 2 strokes of the rotan just to humiliate, Syed Saddiq and MUDA have been done away with. Although Syed Saddiq was found guilty in the Kuala Lumpur High Court on four charges of Criminal Breach of Trust (CBT), misappropriation of property, and money laundering of RM 1.2 million from the Bersatu Youth funds, many believed the sentence was too excessive for the crimes. This sentence potentially takes out Syed Saddiq as a politician for more than a decade, and nips MUDA in the bud, before it can grow. This is very convenient for Pakatan Harapan, which doesn’t want any mosquito parties around. Dr Jayakumar, the head of PSM was arrested just a week ago, over the Kanthan farmer evictions. Many within Pakatan hope Syed Saddiq’s sentence will be a death-blow to MUDA. Syed Saddiq immediately stepped down as MUDA president and handed the reins over to current deputy president Amira Aisya Abd Aziz. Amira is a member of the Johor State Assembly, so MUDA is not without any parliamentary representation. Amira was a co-founder of MUDA and has her own distinct ideas about how MUDA should proceed. Its time for the people to see MUDA was not just a one man band Its now up to Amira to take MUDA in a completely new direction. MUDA may become much less personality based, to focus more on the issues facing the youth of Malaysia. ROS: Muda deputy president's 'blacklist' claim inaccurate Amira has the future of MUDA in her hands. The establishment certainly don’t want her to succeed. Syed Saddiq’s sentencing could lead to the destruction of MUDA as some pundits say. However, Syed Saddiq’s absence could assist on allowing the MUDA message to get out clearer than it has in the past. Only time will tell. In the meantime, we can remember Syed Saddiq with his guest appearance in Namewee’s song Katak. Subscribe Below:

CryptoBilis X Cryptocurrency Malaysia Probably the Biggest Bitcoin Pizza Day celebration you don’t want to miss in 2023! If you didn't make it last year, get your ticket now! If you were there last year, let's party again! Whether you're a die-hard crypto fan or simply love a good slice of pizza, this is the ultimate party for you. Don't miss out on the fun and join us for an unforgettable Bitcoin Pizza Day celebration! Calling all Bitcoiners, Crypto maxis, Web3 builders, and enthusiastic crypto Community members to join us in the Largest Bitcoin Pizza Day Celebration ever hosted. This year we will be celebrating alongside 20+ Exhibitors, 50+ Web3 entities, community members, and a ton of pizzas!! ???? Early bird Tickets start at ???????? ????????. Get yours now before it sells out. The link is here! https://www.cryptobilis.com/pizzaday Limited to 600 Pax only. An event by CryptoBilis Co-Organized by Access.my, Polygon guild Kuala Lumpur, Star Symphony #cryptobilis #bitcoinpizzaday #anighttoremember #cryptocurrencymalaysia #bitcoinmalaysia #pizzaday2023

CryptoBilis x Cryptocurrency Malaysia Tickets are selling fast! 90% of General Access passes are now SOLD OUT! ???????????? Do grab the remaining tickets before it sells out! Here’s your shortcut to get it! ???????????????? https://www.cryptobilis.com/pizzaday Don’t miss the epic night! Note: All Access Passes are still available at an early bird price till the 15th of May. An event by CryptoBilis Co-Organized by Access.my, Polygon guild Kuala Lumpur, Star Symphony

The Petronas Towers (Malay: Menara Berkembar Petronas), also known as the Petronas Twin Towers or KLCC Twin Towers, are a pair of 88-storey supertall skyscrapers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, standing at 451.9 metres (1,483 feet). From 1998 to 2003, they were officially designated as the tallest buildings in the world until they were surpassed by the 2004 completion of the Taipei 101

#SooMee #kuala selangor #Malaysia #paddle fielld

Rioftop Garden and view : Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Tropical plant : in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia roof top garden in Starling Mall , beautiful purple color