• How To Read A Man-Dating:

    How to Read a Man is a guide used to show how you can enter a man’s mind and know what he is thinking. The guide brings to you the ability to know how a man thinks, what his heart desires and ways of pleasing him. All this can be used to control his love and commitment to you. Most at times in a relationship, one party will feel as if the other person does not understand them. Communication gets down and the relationship breaks up. However, if you are able to understand how a man thinks, communication will not be an issue. You would communicate and understand each other. How to read a man teaches you how to pull a man closer by effectively communicating with him. All men have their heart hidden in their mind. You cannot know what they really are unlike women who are easy to read. In fact women easily express themselves hence no need to read them. They have their heat on their faces and too exposed. How to read a man helps balance this by putting a man and a woman in apposition to understand each other. It gives a woman an opportunity to get into a man’s mind.

    I know this sounds crazy and I didn’t even believe it myself until:

    I saw a woman named Daisy use it on her man who was slipping away…
    …and within 14 minutes, he was CHASING HER from his morning meal all the way till dinner.
    I saw Paulina use it on a commitment phobic player who wasn't ready to marry her…
    …and in a day, he was chasing her with a ring in his hand.
    And honestly, I've seen this work even better when you have a man who just can't get attracted to you.
    Because now he will chase you with such desperation, that it'll shock you a little.
    I've even seen single women use this very power to make absolutely GORGEOUS men line up to ask them out.
    And if I was to be honest…
    And even though I am completely against it.

    I've even seen some evil women use this very secret to STEAL men from other women:

    My name is Jake.
    And I am talking to you today because you won't ever learn about this on a popular ladies talk show.
    You won't read about it in a magazine.
    In fact, if I was to be honest, not a single woman in 10,000 knows of this and the one's who do will never share it with you.
    Because these “Obsession Arousing Messages” give you a secret little super power.

    But all that changed one fine evening:

    That evening when I saw her. This woman is named Maggie.
    Maggie came into my life like a breath of fresh air.
    I have to be honest though.
    When I first saw her. I didn't think she would spark my interests.
    In fact, I only spoke to MAGGIE because I wanted her friend’s phone number.
    Her friend. I mean, what can I say about her friend.
    She was a blonde showstopper who looked like a playboy supermodel.
    She had me bedazzled at the very first sight.
    Maggie wasn’t my type and wasn’t even on my list of probabilities.
    But it wasn't until I saw that "One TEXT" from Maggie.

    How to Read A Man's Body Language:

    Men can be extremely hard to read -- especially because the average man uses 13,000 less words on average per day than women. Even though men might not say much with their words, they are saying everything with their body language.
    Men can be extremely hard to read -- especially because the average man uses 13,000 less words on average per day than women.
    I have learned to decipher the difference between my husband's phlegm grunt and his guttural humph. Then I realised there was a better way. As I became a body language expert I watched my relationships change and deepen. I learned to listen to people and read people beyond their words. Even though men might not say much with their words, they are saying everything with their body language.

    Advantages:

    It helps understand the reasons why men would rather walk away from an argument than stay to argue. You will know why a man will go opening up to his friends rather than giving you the facts on face. The guide will give you techniques that will keep your man around. He will not need to walk away from your arguments. The guide/program will help you not to take it negatively when a man does not verbally pour his heart to you. It will help you understand ways men use to relieve things off their mind. The How to Read a Man book will make you understand all the things your man has been meaning to tell you but you could not read between the lines. Most at times, a man will tell you things but you won’t get what they exactly are saying. They do not get as straight as women do. The program teaches you on how to activate your man’s protective instincts. The How to Read a Man book will tell you on how to use a man’s driving force to your advantage. You will also know what the man expects from you. You don’t like reading a lot? How to read a man has a downloadable audio version of the whole program that you can play and listen to. How to read comes with a 60-day full money refund guarantee in case it does not satisfy you.

    Personally, I do not find more to lose trying out this book. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages. So far, the disadvantages are personal. They may not apply to every reader. I find the 60-day money refund flexible, the downloadable audio version is a great save of time if you think you may waste a lot of time reading it. You can play it anywhere, on the bus, while doing other chores or when in bed.in summary, you have nothing to lose trying out the program.

    Now you know everything you ought to know when it comes to How To Read a Man: https://tinyurl.com/2jpfph4z

    #howtoreadman #datingguide #worthrelationships #understandfeelings




    How To Read A Man-Dating: How to Read a Man is a guide used to show how you can enter a man’s mind and know what he is thinking. The guide brings to you the ability to know how a man thinks, what his heart desires and ways of pleasing him. All this can be used to control his love and commitment to you. Most at times in a relationship, one party will feel as if the other person does not understand them. Communication gets down and the relationship breaks up. However, if you are able to understand how a man thinks, communication will not be an issue. You would communicate and understand each other. How to read a man teaches you how to pull a man closer by effectively communicating with him. All men have their heart hidden in their mind. You cannot know what they really are unlike women who are easy to read. In fact women easily express themselves hence no need to read them. They have their heat on their faces and too exposed. How to read a man helps balance this by putting a man and a woman in apposition to understand each other. It gives a woman an opportunity to get into a man’s mind. I know this sounds crazy and I didn’t even believe it myself until: I saw a woman named Daisy use it on her man who was slipping away… …and within 14 minutes, he was CHASING HER from his morning meal all the way till dinner. I saw Paulina use it on a commitment phobic player who wasn't ready to marry her… …and in a day, he was chasing her with a ring in his hand. And honestly, I've seen this work even better when you have a man who just can't get attracted to you. Because now he will chase you with such desperation, that it'll shock you a little. I've even seen single women use this very power to make absolutely GORGEOUS men line up to ask them out. And if I was to be honest… And even though I am completely against it. I've even seen some evil women use this very secret to STEAL men from other women: My name is Jake. And I am talking to you today because you won't ever learn about this on a popular ladies talk show. You won't read about it in a magazine. In fact, if I was to be honest, not a single woman in 10,000 knows of this and the one's who do will never share it with you. Because these “Obsession Arousing Messages” give you a secret little super power. But all that changed one fine evening: That evening when I saw her. This woman is named Maggie. Maggie came into my life like a breath of fresh air. I have to be honest though. When I first saw her. I didn't think she would spark my interests. In fact, I only spoke to MAGGIE because I wanted her friend’s phone number. Her friend. I mean, what can I say about her friend. She was a blonde showstopper who looked like a playboy supermodel. She had me bedazzled at the very first sight. Maggie wasn’t my type and wasn’t even on my list of probabilities. But it wasn't until I saw that "One TEXT" from Maggie. How to Read A Man's Body Language: Men can be extremely hard to read -- especially because the average man uses 13,000 less words on average per day than women. Even though men might not say much with their words, they are saying everything with their body language. Men can be extremely hard to read -- especially because the average man uses 13,000 less words on average per day than women. I have learned to decipher the difference between my husband's phlegm grunt and his guttural humph. Then I realised there was a better way. As I became a body language expert I watched my relationships change and deepen. I learned to listen to people and read people beyond their words. Even though men might not say much with their words, they are saying everything with their body language. Advantages: It helps understand the reasons why men would rather walk away from an argument than stay to argue. You will know why a man will go opening up to his friends rather than giving you the facts on face. The guide will give you techniques that will keep your man around. He will not need to walk away from your arguments. The guide/program will help you not to take it negatively when a man does not verbally pour his heart to you. It will help you understand ways men use to relieve things off their mind. The How to Read a Man book will make you understand all the things your man has been meaning to tell you but you could not read between the lines. Most at times, a man will tell you things but you won’t get what they exactly are saying. They do not get as straight as women do. The program teaches you on how to activate your man’s protective instincts. The How to Read a Man book will tell you on how to use a man’s driving force to your advantage. You will also know what the man expects from you. You don’t like reading a lot? How to read a man has a downloadable audio version of the whole program that you can play and listen to. How to read comes with a 60-day full money refund guarantee in case it does not satisfy you. Personally, I do not find more to lose trying out this book. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages. So far, the disadvantages are personal. They may not apply to every reader. I find the 60-day money refund flexible, the downloadable audio version is a great save of time if you think you may waste a lot of time reading it. You can play it anywhere, on the bus, while doing other chores or when in bed.in summary, you have nothing to lose trying out the program. Now you know everything you ought to know when it comes to How To Read a Man: https://tinyurl.com/2jpfph4z #howtoreadman #datingguide #worthrelationships #understandfeelings
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3143 Views
  • Trump muses on ethnically cleansing Palestinians from Gaza
    Michael F. Brown Power Suits 30 January 2025

    President Donald Trump with hands upraised at podium with man and American flag in background
    President Donald Trump frequently makes statements without sufficient facts or thinking through the consequences.
    Bonnie Cash UPI
    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been issued with an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity and war crimes, will likely visit President Donald Trump at the White House as soon as next week.

    Whether Netanyahu will discuss Trump’s recent musings on ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip or focus on Iran and expanding the Abraham Accords remains to be seen.

    On Saturday on board Air Force One, Trump was asked about a call he had earlier in the day with King Abdullah of Jordan.

    Trump emphasized that the subject of their discussion was Jordan taking more Palestinian refugees.

    “He really houses, you know, millions of Palestinians, and he does it in a very humane way. And I compliment him on that. But he really – Jordan has done an amazing job of housing largely Palestinians. And he’s done it in a very successful way.”

    Trump added, “I said to him, ‘I’d love you to take on more.’ Because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess. It’s a real mess.”

    The president also noted he’d like “Egypt to take people” and would talk the following day with Egyptian President Abdulfattah al-Sisi. Egyptian media reported Tuesday there has not been a discussion between the two leaders.

    Trump then spoke specifics about removing some three quarters of Gaza’s population, though it wasn’t entirely clear if he thought he was talking about the entire population. “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing.”

    Winging it, he acknowledged ignorance. “And I don’t know. It’s something [that] has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now. Almost everything is demolished, and people are dying there. So, I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change.”

    Asked if this would be temporary, Trump responded, “It could be temporarily, could be long term.”

    Rather than asking the obvious question about ethnic cleansing, the next journalist then pivoted to artificial intelligence.

    Later, the conversation did return to Trump releasing to Israel 2,000-pound bombs paused by the Biden administration. Asked why, Trump said, “Because they bought them.”

    There was no discussion about how Israel had previously used those bombs against Palestinian men, women and children in their homes to deadly effect.

    This is not an adversarial press, but one that too readily concedes ground rather than challenges Trump on ethnic cleansing and American allies using American weaponry to commit serious human rights violations, including genocide.

    Trump’s casual talk of ethnic cleansing received quick support from former Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir who euphemistically refers to it as Palestinians leaving on a “voluntary” basis.

    Ben-Gvir tweeted: “I commend US President Trump for the initiative to transfer residents from Gaza to Jordan and Egypt. One of our demands from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to promote voluntary emigration. When the president of the world’s greatest superpower, Trump, personally brings up this idea, it is worth the Israeli government implementing it – promote emigration now!”

    Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich also took up the ethnic cleansing idea, though he did not mention Trump in his tweet. “After 76 years in which most of the population of Gaza was held by force under harsh conditions to maintain the ambition to destroy the state of Israel, the idea of ​​helping them find other places to start a new, good life is a great idea. After years of sanctifying terror, they will be able to establish a new, good life elsewhere.”

    Smotrich did cite Trump while speaking to journalists about developing an “operational plan” to turn the president’s words into reality.

    He claimed: “There is nothing to be excited about the weak opposition of Egypt and Jordan to the plan. We saw yesterday how Trump [imposed his will on] Colombia to deport immigrants despite its opposition. When he wants it, it happens.”

    Unsurprisingly, as Smotrich indicates, both Jordanian and Egyptian officials reject Trump’s rhetorical broadside. Alarmingly, CNN reports that “Amit Segal, an analyst with Israeli network Channel 12 News, cited Israeli officials and reported Trump’s move was ‘not a slip of the tongue but part of a much broader move than it seems, coordinated with Israel.’”

    If Segal’s claim is true, this is something to watch closely in the weeks ahead and at the Trump-Netanyahu meeting next week. Even before the inauguration, an official in the presidential transition also raised Indonesia as one of the locations to which Palestinians could be moved – meaning ethnically cleansed.

    In response to a question from The Electronic Intifada asking why Trump wants Palestinians to go to Jordan and Egypt rather than to homes and lands in Israel that they were expelled from in 1948, a State Department spokesperson in bold letters responded: “We aren’t going to comment on the president’s comments. We refer you to the White House.”

    It’s noteworthy the State Department is already so hollowed out by Trump that it can’t even reject ethnic cleansing. Of course, Biden’s State Department was similarly inept, even cruel, when questioned about its policies toward Israel and Palestinians in Gaza.

    Al Mezan, a human rights group in Gaza, also raised the right of return rather than ethnic cleansing. “Instead of advancing or supporting actions that blatantly breach international law, the international community must commit to its enforcement by ensuring the realization of the inalienable right of Palestinian refugees – who form over 70 percent of Gaza’s total population – to return to their ancestral homes and lands from which they were forcibly expelled in 1948 by Zionist militias and the Israeli military.”

    The human rights organization welcomed “the statements made by Jordan, Egypt, the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which firmly reject any proposals or calls for the forcible transfer of Palestinians from Gaza.”


    With Palestinians being denied movement north the day of Trump’s remarks, I harbored profound concerns about the plans of Trump and Netanyahu. But Palestinians moved north on Monday amid remarkable scenes of resilience and celebration, even as many knew they were likely to find ruins – courtesy of Netanyahu and President Joe Biden – where once their houses had stood.
    Mitchell Plitnick at Mondoweiss points out that Trump may view Gaza as a “massive real estate swindle.” Trump’s ambiguous words earlier in the month – “some beautiful things can be done with [Gaza]” – certainly hint at that possibility and the return of illegal settlements.

    Admittedly, this is reading the worst fears into his comments based on his settler-colonial inclinations as demonstrated in his first term with his colonizing actions on the Golan Heights and Jerusalem. Palestinians going north would seemingly allay those concerns, but Trump is anything but consistent, veering wildly from idea to idea.

    Trump, it bears repeating, often voices the views of those he’s most recently heard from on a subject. This raises the concern that Trump is getting wretched advice.

    For the moment, however, it seems Trump – who is now closely associated with the ceasefire – may make sickening comments, but still want to see at least the first stage of the ceasefire succeed.

    Indeed, Trump repeated his remarks on Monday, again aboard Air Force One. He maintained that he would “like to get [Palestinians from Gaza] living in an area where they can live without disruption and revolution and violence so much.”

    Trump also noted, “When you look at the Gaza Strip, it’s been hell for so many years.”

    Then, weakly attempting to demonstrate his grasp of Gaza’s history though without saying a word about the 1948 Nakba and dispossession of Palestinians to Gaza, he said: “There have been various civilizations on that strip. It didn’t start here. It started thousands of years before, and there’s always been violence associated with it. You could get people living in areas that are a lot safer and maybe a lot better and maybe a lot more comfortable.”

    Repeating standard American government racism about the region, Trump added: “I wish [al-Sisi] would take some. We helped them a lot, and I’m sure he’d help us. He’s a friend of mine. He’s in … a rough neighbourhood. But I think he would do it, and I think the king of Jordan would do it too.”

    Even as Palestinians continue to move north, Trump’s willingness to repeat the threat is alarming as other leaders have buckled to the president’s threats previously. Ethnic cleansing, however, is on a whole different scale.

    Senator Bernie Sanders did take the president to task and name Trump’s words appropriately. “There is a name for this – ethnic cleansing – and it’s a war crime,” Sanders tweeted.


    Unwinding the ceasefire, as Ben-Gvir and Smotrich want, and forcing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians south again – and perhaps into Egypt – might surpass the viciousness of the past 15 months. Yet Palestinian determination to remain rooted to the land and return to northern Gaza has, for now, carried the day.
    Déjà vu

    There was a lot of rightful teeth-gnashing over the callous way Trump engaged with the idea of ethnic cleansing against a people that already endured the 1948 Nakba, but it certainly has a recent precedent.

    The Biden administration also entertained the idea, just minus the rough edges of Trump. As Trump has, the Biden administration faced similar regional pushback.

    Less than a week into the onslaught, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepared to fly to Israel, a journalist questioned him on the tarmac about “civilian safe passage” to Egypt.

    That exchange is worth citing in full.

    Journalist: “Mr Secretary, yesterday, [Biden’s national security adviser] Jake Sullivan said that US officials were talking to the Israelis about getting civilian safe passage through Gaza into Egypt. Today, [White House spokesperson] John Kirby said they’re still talking to officials about this. What is the holdup? What’s the obstacle to getting civilian safe passage out of Gaza?”

    Blinken: “We are talking about that. We’re talking to Israel about that. We’re talking to Egypt about that. It’s an ongoing conversation. I can’t get into the details. Some of this is needless to say and understandably complicated, but we want to make sure to the best of our ability and I know Israel wants to make sure to the best of its ability that civilians are not harmed. But Israel has to take steps to defend itself. It has to make sure that any ongoing threat is dealt with and I believe it has to make sure that going forward what happened doesn’t happen again.”

    Journalist: “Is the issue more on the Israeli side?”

    Blinken: “I’m not going to get into the details, but it’s an ongoing conversation.”

    Blinken is more refined in his language than the crass Trump, but he’s talking ethnic cleansing – at the very least to Egypt – in his comments. He’s just far too diplomatic to spell it out in all its ugliness.

    With Blinken working this possibility, it’s clear that Biden was also giving initial support.


    Yes, the Biden administration did shift away from the idea. And Trump may do the same, effectively moving in that direction with the surge of Palestinian refugees north. Both leaders certainly heard from regional leaders that ethnic cleansing to their countries would be an exceptionally bad and unacceptable idea.
    What remains different for now is that Biden provided weaponry for a genocide. Trump is providing weapons, but in the midst of a ceasefire. The obvious danger is the 2,000-pound bombs will be employed later.

    For the moment, however, the president remains invested in a ceasefire that he has bragged about on social media.

    Trump adhering to the ceasefire remains a positive sign. His promotion of ethnic cleansing, however, even if just rhetoric at the moment, is extremely worrisome for the future, as are the champions of “Judea and Samaria” he is putting forward to represent the US at the United Nations and in Israel.

    These are warning signals of how quickly Trump could allow the situation in both Gaza and the West Bank to deteriorate.

    Donald Trump
    Benjamin Netanyahu
    International Criminal Court
    King Abdullah of Jordan
    ethnic cleansing
    Gaza genocide
    Gaza war crimes
    Abdulfattah al-Sisi
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    Bezalel Smotrich
    Amit Segal
    CNN
    Biden administration
    Al Mezan Center for Human Rights
    Arab League
    Organization of Islamic Cooperation
    Mitchell Plitnick
    settler-colonialism
    Bernie Sanders
    right of return
    Antony Blinken
    Judea and Samaria

    https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/michael-f-brown/trump-muses-ethnically-cleansing-palestinians-gaza
    Trump muses on ethnically cleansing Palestinians from Gaza Michael F. Brown Power Suits 30 January 2025 President Donald Trump with hands upraised at podium with man and American flag in background President Donald Trump frequently makes statements without sufficient facts or thinking through the consequences. Bonnie Cash UPI Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been issued with an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity and war crimes, will likely visit President Donald Trump at the White House as soon as next week. Whether Netanyahu will discuss Trump’s recent musings on ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip or focus on Iran and expanding the Abraham Accords remains to be seen. On Saturday on board Air Force One, Trump was asked about a call he had earlier in the day with King Abdullah of Jordan. Trump emphasized that the subject of their discussion was Jordan taking more Palestinian refugees. “He really houses, you know, millions of Palestinians, and he does it in a very humane way. And I compliment him on that. But he really – Jordan has done an amazing job of housing largely Palestinians. And he’s done it in a very successful way.” Trump added, “I said to him, ‘I’d love you to take on more.’ Because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess. It’s a real mess.” The president also noted he’d like “Egypt to take people” and would talk the following day with Egyptian President Abdulfattah al-Sisi. Egyptian media reported Tuesday there has not been a discussion between the two leaders. Trump then spoke specifics about removing some three quarters of Gaza’s population, though it wasn’t entirely clear if he thought he was talking about the entire population. “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing.” Winging it, he acknowledged ignorance. “And I don’t know. It’s something [that] has to happen, but it’s literally a demolition site right now. Almost everything is demolished, and people are dying there. So, I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change.” Asked if this would be temporary, Trump responded, “It could be temporarily, could be long term.” Rather than asking the obvious question about ethnic cleansing, the next journalist then pivoted to artificial intelligence. Later, the conversation did return to Trump releasing to Israel 2,000-pound bombs paused by the Biden administration. Asked why, Trump said, “Because they bought them.” There was no discussion about how Israel had previously used those bombs against Palestinian men, women and children in their homes to deadly effect. This is not an adversarial press, but one that too readily concedes ground rather than challenges Trump on ethnic cleansing and American allies using American weaponry to commit serious human rights violations, including genocide. Trump’s casual talk of ethnic cleansing received quick support from former Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir who euphemistically refers to it as Palestinians leaving on a “voluntary” basis. Ben-Gvir tweeted: “I commend US President Trump for the initiative to transfer residents from Gaza to Jordan and Egypt. One of our demands from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to promote voluntary emigration. When the president of the world’s greatest superpower, Trump, personally brings up this idea, it is worth the Israeli government implementing it – promote emigration now!” Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich also took up the ethnic cleansing idea, though he did not mention Trump in his tweet. “After 76 years in which most of the population of Gaza was held by force under harsh conditions to maintain the ambition to destroy the state of Israel, the idea of ​​helping them find other places to start a new, good life is a great idea. After years of sanctifying terror, they will be able to establish a new, good life elsewhere.” Smotrich did cite Trump while speaking to journalists about developing an “operational plan” to turn the president’s words into reality. He claimed: “There is nothing to be excited about the weak opposition of Egypt and Jordan to the plan. We saw yesterday how Trump [imposed his will on] Colombia to deport immigrants despite its opposition. When he wants it, it happens.” Unsurprisingly, as Smotrich indicates, both Jordanian and Egyptian officials reject Trump’s rhetorical broadside. Alarmingly, CNN reports that “Amit Segal, an analyst with Israeli network Channel 12 News, cited Israeli officials and reported Trump’s move was ‘not a slip of the tongue but part of a much broader move than it seems, coordinated with Israel.’” If Segal’s claim is true, this is something to watch closely in the weeks ahead and at the Trump-Netanyahu meeting next week. Even before the inauguration, an official in the presidential transition also raised Indonesia as one of the locations to which Palestinians could be moved – meaning ethnically cleansed. In response to a question from The Electronic Intifada asking why Trump wants Palestinians to go to Jordan and Egypt rather than to homes and lands in Israel that they were expelled from in 1948, a State Department spokesperson in bold letters responded: “We aren’t going to comment on the president’s comments. We refer you to the White House.” It’s noteworthy the State Department is already so hollowed out by Trump that it can’t even reject ethnic cleansing. Of course, Biden’s State Department was similarly inept, even cruel, when questioned about its policies toward Israel and Palestinians in Gaza. Al Mezan, a human rights group in Gaza, also raised the right of return rather than ethnic cleansing. “Instead of advancing or supporting actions that blatantly breach international law, the international community must commit to its enforcement by ensuring the realization of the inalienable right of Palestinian refugees – who form over 70 percent of Gaza’s total population – to return to their ancestral homes and lands from which they were forcibly expelled in 1948 by Zionist militias and the Israeli military.” The human rights organization welcomed “the statements made by Jordan, Egypt, the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which firmly reject any proposals or calls for the forcible transfer of Palestinians from Gaza.” With Palestinians being denied movement north the day of Trump’s remarks, I harbored profound concerns about the plans of Trump and Netanyahu. But Palestinians moved north on Monday amid remarkable scenes of resilience and celebration, even as many knew they were likely to find ruins – courtesy of Netanyahu and President Joe Biden – where once their houses had stood. Mitchell Plitnick at Mondoweiss points out that Trump may view Gaza as a “massive real estate swindle.” Trump’s ambiguous words earlier in the month – “some beautiful things can be done with [Gaza]” – certainly hint at that possibility and the return of illegal settlements. Admittedly, this is reading the worst fears into his comments based on his settler-colonial inclinations as demonstrated in his first term with his colonizing actions on the Golan Heights and Jerusalem. Palestinians going north would seemingly allay those concerns, but Trump is anything but consistent, veering wildly from idea to idea. Trump, it bears repeating, often voices the views of those he’s most recently heard from on a subject. This raises the concern that Trump is getting wretched advice. For the moment, however, it seems Trump – who is now closely associated with the ceasefire – may make sickening comments, but still want to see at least the first stage of the ceasefire succeed. Indeed, Trump repeated his remarks on Monday, again aboard Air Force One. He maintained that he would “like to get [Palestinians from Gaza] living in an area where they can live without disruption and revolution and violence so much.” Trump also noted, “When you look at the Gaza Strip, it’s been hell for so many years.” Then, weakly attempting to demonstrate his grasp of Gaza’s history though without saying a word about the 1948 Nakba and dispossession of Palestinians to Gaza, he said: “There have been various civilizations on that strip. It didn’t start here. It started thousands of years before, and there’s always been violence associated with it. You could get people living in areas that are a lot safer and maybe a lot better and maybe a lot more comfortable.” Repeating standard American government racism about the region, Trump added: “I wish [al-Sisi] would take some. We helped them a lot, and I’m sure he’d help us. He’s a friend of mine. He’s in … a rough neighbourhood. But I think he would do it, and I think the king of Jordan would do it too.” Even as Palestinians continue to move north, Trump’s willingness to repeat the threat is alarming as other leaders have buckled to the president’s threats previously. Ethnic cleansing, however, is on a whole different scale. Senator Bernie Sanders did take the president to task and name Trump’s words appropriately. “There is a name for this – ethnic cleansing – and it’s a war crime,” Sanders tweeted. Unwinding the ceasefire, as Ben-Gvir and Smotrich want, and forcing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians south again – and perhaps into Egypt – might surpass the viciousness of the past 15 months. Yet Palestinian determination to remain rooted to the land and return to northern Gaza has, for now, carried the day. Déjà vu There was a lot of rightful teeth-gnashing over the callous way Trump engaged with the idea of ethnic cleansing against a people that already endured the 1948 Nakba, but it certainly has a recent precedent. The Biden administration also entertained the idea, just minus the rough edges of Trump. As Trump has, the Biden administration faced similar regional pushback. Less than a week into the onslaught, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepared to fly to Israel, a journalist questioned him on the tarmac about “civilian safe passage” to Egypt. That exchange is worth citing in full. Journalist: “Mr Secretary, yesterday, [Biden’s national security adviser] Jake Sullivan said that US officials were talking to the Israelis about getting civilian safe passage through Gaza into Egypt. Today, [White House spokesperson] John Kirby said they’re still talking to officials about this. What is the holdup? What’s the obstacle to getting civilian safe passage out of Gaza?” Blinken: “We are talking about that. We’re talking to Israel about that. We’re talking to Egypt about that. It’s an ongoing conversation. I can’t get into the details. Some of this is needless to say and understandably complicated, but we want to make sure to the best of our ability and I know Israel wants to make sure to the best of its ability that civilians are not harmed. But Israel has to take steps to defend itself. It has to make sure that any ongoing threat is dealt with and I believe it has to make sure that going forward what happened doesn’t happen again.” Journalist: “Is the issue more on the Israeli side?” Blinken: “I’m not going to get into the details, but it’s an ongoing conversation.” Blinken is more refined in his language than the crass Trump, but he’s talking ethnic cleansing – at the very least to Egypt – in his comments. He’s just far too diplomatic to spell it out in all its ugliness. With Blinken working this possibility, it’s clear that Biden was also giving initial support. Yes, the Biden administration did shift away from the idea. And Trump may do the same, effectively moving in that direction with the surge of Palestinian refugees north. Both leaders certainly heard from regional leaders that ethnic cleansing to their countries would be an exceptionally bad and unacceptable idea. What remains different for now is that Biden provided weaponry for a genocide. Trump is providing weapons, but in the midst of a ceasefire. The obvious danger is the 2,000-pound bombs will be employed later. For the moment, however, the president remains invested in a ceasefire that he has bragged about on social media. Trump adhering to the ceasefire remains a positive sign. His promotion of ethnic cleansing, however, even if just rhetoric at the moment, is extremely worrisome for the future, as are the champions of “Judea and Samaria” he is putting forward to represent the US at the United Nations and in Israel. These are warning signals of how quickly Trump could allow the situation in both Gaza and the West Bank to deteriorate. Donald Trump Benjamin Netanyahu International Criminal Court King Abdullah of Jordan ethnic cleansing Gaza genocide Gaza war crimes Abdulfattah al-Sisi Itamar Ben-Gvir Bezalel Smotrich Amit Segal CNN Biden administration Al Mezan Center for Human Rights Arab League Organization of Islamic Cooperation Mitchell Plitnick settler-colonialism Bernie Sanders right of return Antony Blinken Judea and Samaria https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/michael-f-brown/trump-muses-ethnically-cleansing-palestinians-gaza
    0 Comments 0 Shares 6897 Views
  • 9 Essential Facts About ChatGPT: The AI Chatbot That Answers It All

    Discover the power of ChatGPT, the AI chatbot that delivers accurate, real-time responses! Learn 9 essential facts about how ChatGPT enhances communication and solves problems. From its advanced natural language processing to seamless integration, explore how ChatGPT Developers create smarter, more efficient interactions for businesses. Unveil the future of customer support and AI-driven solutions with ChatGPT.

    READ MORE:
    https://www.techugo.com/blog/9-things-you-need-to-know-about-chat-gpt-chatbots-that-provide-answers/

    #AIAppDevelopmentCompany #MobileAppDevelopment #ChatGptDevelopers
    9 Essential Facts About ChatGPT: The AI Chatbot That Answers It All Discover the power of ChatGPT, the AI chatbot that delivers accurate, real-time responses! Learn 9 essential facts about how ChatGPT enhances communication and solves problems. From its advanced natural language processing to seamless integration, explore how ChatGPT Developers create smarter, more efficient interactions for businesses. Unveil the future of customer support and AI-driven solutions with ChatGPT. READ MORE: https://www.techugo.com/blog/9-things-you-need-to-know-about-chat-gpt-chatbots-that-provide-answers/ #AIAppDevelopmentCompany #MobileAppDevelopment #ChatGptDevelopers
    WWW.TECHUGO.COM
    You Need to Know About Chat Gpt: Chatbots that Provide Answers
    What is Chat GPT and how does it work? These are just a few of the many questions you might have. This guide will help you understand the technology
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1246 Views
  • Facing the Facts: Why Pharmacology Assignments Are So Challenging

    Pharmacology assignments can feel overwhelming with their complex drug interactions, mechanisms of action, and extensive memorization of terms. But don't stress!

    We've created an infographic to break down exactly what makes these assignments so challenging and how you can overcome them.

    Get pharmacology homework help to save time and improve your understanding.

    Don’t miss out! Click to view and share with fellow students.

    WhatsApp:- +91-9878492406
    Email:- [email protected]
    Website:- https://onlinecollegehomeworkhelp.com/pharmacology-homework-help

    #onlinecollegehomeworkhelp #clinicalpharmacology #pharmacologyonline #advancedpharmacology #medicalpharmacology #pharmacologywebsite #essentialsofmedicalpharmacology #pharmacologyassignmenthelp #pharmacologyhomeworkhelp #infographic #pharmacologychallenges
    🚨 Facing the Facts: Why Pharmacology Assignments Are So Challenging 🚨 💊Pharmacology assignments can feel overwhelming with their complex drug interactions, mechanisms of action, and extensive memorization of terms. But don't stress! ✨ We've created an infographic to break down exactly what makes these assignments so challenging and how you can overcome them. Get pharmacology homework help to save time and improve your understanding. 📌 Don’t miss out! Click to view and share with fellow students. 📲 WhatsApp:- +91-9878492406 📩 Email:- [email protected] 🌐Website:- https://onlinecollegehomeworkhelp.com/pharmacology-homework-help #onlinecollegehomeworkhelp #clinicalpharmacology #pharmacologyonline #advancedpharmacology #medicalpharmacology #pharmacologywebsite #essentialsofmedicalpharmacology #pharmacologyassignmenthelp #pharmacologyhomeworkhelp #infographic #pharmacologychallenges
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2056 Views
  • Efforts We Make In Life
    by R. Gidon Rothstein

    Parshat Mikeitz

    The Cup, a Debatable Tool of Divination

    Yosef’s house-master catches the brothers, “discovers” the goblet they stole, and rebukes them, 44;5. How could they have imagined they would get away with it, when Yosef nachesh yenachesh bo, a phrase the translations on Sefaria all take to mean he performs divination with it. Ibn Ezra is less sure.

    He first suggests it means to test, i.e. Yosef was testing to see if they would steal it. Ibn Ezra points us to 30;27, where Lavan used the same word to explain how he figured out Elokim had blessed him because of Ya’akov. There, Ibn Ezra’s comment blurs the issue. He first says nisiti, I tested, which sounds like Lavan figured it out somehow. He keeps going, though, says for Lavan was wont to use nechashim, which does seem to mean divination, except he adds Lavan had terafim. Back in VaYetzei, we saw (as it happens) that Ibn Ezra thought terafim were non-divination tools of discovery about the world.

    The continuation of the comment also moves away from magical predictions. He says the housemaster meant to say, how could you not have been afraid, when I put the silver goblet before you specifically to test you, and deliberately turned away, to the point you would take it. Ibn Ezra’s main reading, I think, did not think nichush meant consulting the stars or occult forces, it referred to finding an unusual, but natural, way to hidden truths. Terafim told Lavan what he couldn’t find on his own, in a nonobvious but natural way, and the nichush here tells Yosef and the housemaster about the brothers’ supposed willingness to steal the goblet.

    But it’s hard to resist the pull of divination. Ibn Ezra quotes R. Yonah (I think ibn Janah, a known grammarian) who said yenachesh bo meant because of it, the loss of the goblet led Yosef to consult with menachashim, with those who do perform divination. In this reading, which Ibn Ezra is comfortable with, the goblet itself didn’t help with the sorcery, but lead Yosef and the housemaster to consult sorcerers.

    Or, finally, maybe Yosef pretended to use the goblet. It was made with designs on it as if it were a vehicle of prediction, and Yosef consulted it as if it told the brothers’ birth order.

    Ibn Ezra dances around divination rather than rejects it. His first reading turns the word into a term for figuring out unknown facts, for Lavan and this housemaster. If it does mean sorcery, he accepts R. Yonah’s idea the housemaster meant the loss of the goblet would stimulate Yosef to ask those who do engage in those arts, and if the cup itself, it was Yosef pretending to have it tell him truths he could not know otherwise.

    A Little Gift

    When Ya’akov concedes the brothers need to go back to Egypt, with Binyamin, to buy food, 43;11, he bids his sons bring a gift for the feared Egyptian leader. Sforno picks up on an odd word in that gift, me’at. Ya’akov tells them to take me’at tzari, me’at devash. The Contemporary JPS translation, as well as the Schocken Bible of Everett Fox (both on Sefaria) render me’at “some,” some balm and some honey, sidestepping the easiest reading of the word, a little bit (the more traditional translations on Sefaria, such as Koren and Metsudah, do use “little”). I think they opt for “some,” because it seems odd for Ya’akov to have the brothers bring only a little of an item for a gift.

    Sforno attacks the problem head on. We gift differently to people for whom money is no object, he says. Many people (sadly, no matter how wealthy) still look to make their next buck (imagine the richest man in the world fighting to be paid an outlandish salary). But some people have realized they don’t need more money (or even started giving it away). Ya’akov imagines this distant Egyptian as a man who has more than enough. The size of a gift will make no impression on him.

    Instead, he intends to gift rare items, where any amount is appreciated.

    Living and Not Dying

    When Ya’akov first sends his sons to Egypt to buy food, 42;2, his goal is ve-nichyeh ve-lo namut, we will live and not die. Or HaChayim offers two illuminating explanations for the seeming redundancy (if they live, they clearly won’t die, and vice verse).

    First, he suggests Ya’akov was articulating their responsibility to protect their lives, their job—and ours—to do what they could to live. Failure would lead to a guilty verdict in the Heavenly court, they would die in this world and be judged in the next. By going to Egypt, they would live, physically, from the food they would secure, and not die in the next world. A first option: Ya’akov was reminding them, and us, of the human obligation to work at living, to do what we can to sustain our lives.

    His second option takes a more mundane view, we will live well if you find a lot of food to buy, not die if you only find the minimal amount to achieve that. It reminds me of what mori ve-rabi R. Lichtenstein once said about the Yeshiva’s gemach, interest-free loan fund . In encouraging donations to the fund, he said people shouldn’t have to survive on bread alone, it was reasonable to want butter on the bread as well.

    Here, too, Or HaChayyim thinks Ya’akov is saying, you might get enough for us to live, or, if not, at least not to die.

    Sorcery may or may not work, but we can find hidden facts in other ways, according to Ibn Ezra. Some people don’t need anything more, but we can find the kinds of gifts they will still relish, Sforno understood. And sometimes we might find only basic sustenance rather than comfort, Or HaChayyim taught us.
    Efforts We Make In Life by R. Gidon Rothstein Parshat Mikeitz The Cup, a Debatable Tool of Divination Yosef’s house-master catches the brothers, “discovers” the goblet they stole, and rebukes them, 44;5. How could they have imagined they would get away with it, when Yosef nachesh yenachesh bo, a phrase the translations on Sefaria all take to mean he performs divination with it. Ibn Ezra is less sure. He first suggests it means to test, i.e. Yosef was testing to see if they would steal it. Ibn Ezra points us to 30;27, where Lavan used the same word to explain how he figured out Elokim had blessed him because of Ya’akov. There, Ibn Ezra’s comment blurs the issue. He first says nisiti, I tested, which sounds like Lavan figured it out somehow. He keeps going, though, says for Lavan was wont to use nechashim, which does seem to mean divination, except he adds Lavan had terafim. Back in VaYetzei, we saw (as it happens) that Ibn Ezra thought terafim were non-divination tools of discovery about the world. The continuation of the comment also moves away from magical predictions. He says the housemaster meant to say, how could you not have been afraid, when I put the silver goblet before you specifically to test you, and deliberately turned away, to the point you would take it. Ibn Ezra’s main reading, I think, did not think nichush meant consulting the stars or occult forces, it referred to finding an unusual, but natural, way to hidden truths. Terafim told Lavan what he couldn’t find on his own, in a nonobvious but natural way, and the nichush here tells Yosef and the housemaster about the brothers’ supposed willingness to steal the goblet. But it’s hard to resist the pull of divination. Ibn Ezra quotes R. Yonah (I think ibn Janah, a known grammarian) who said yenachesh bo meant because of it, the loss of the goblet led Yosef to consult with menachashim, with those who do perform divination. In this reading, which Ibn Ezra is comfortable with, the goblet itself didn’t help with the sorcery, but lead Yosef and the housemaster to consult sorcerers. Or, finally, maybe Yosef pretended to use the goblet. It was made with designs on it as if it were a vehicle of prediction, and Yosef consulted it as if it told the brothers’ birth order. Ibn Ezra dances around divination rather than rejects it. His first reading turns the word into a term for figuring out unknown facts, for Lavan and this housemaster. If it does mean sorcery, he accepts R. Yonah’s idea the housemaster meant the loss of the goblet would stimulate Yosef to ask those who do engage in those arts, and if the cup itself, it was Yosef pretending to have it tell him truths he could not know otherwise. A Little Gift When Ya’akov concedes the brothers need to go back to Egypt, with Binyamin, to buy food, 43;11, he bids his sons bring a gift for the feared Egyptian leader. Sforno picks up on an odd word in that gift, me’at. Ya’akov tells them to take me’at tzari, me’at devash. The Contemporary JPS translation, as well as the Schocken Bible of Everett Fox (both on Sefaria) render me’at “some,” some balm and some honey, sidestepping the easiest reading of the word, a little bit (the more traditional translations on Sefaria, such as Koren and Metsudah, do use “little”). I think they opt for “some,” because it seems odd for Ya’akov to have the brothers bring only a little of an item for a gift. Sforno attacks the problem head on. We gift differently to people for whom money is no object, he says. Many people (sadly, no matter how wealthy) still look to make their next buck (imagine the richest man in the world fighting to be paid an outlandish salary). But some people have realized they don’t need more money (or even started giving it away). Ya’akov imagines this distant Egyptian as a man who has more than enough. The size of a gift will make no impression on him. Instead, he intends to gift rare items, where any amount is appreciated. Living and Not Dying When Ya’akov first sends his sons to Egypt to buy food, 42;2, his goal is ve-nichyeh ve-lo namut, we will live and not die. Or HaChayim offers two illuminating explanations for the seeming redundancy (if they live, they clearly won’t die, and vice verse). First, he suggests Ya’akov was articulating their responsibility to protect their lives, their job—and ours—to do what they could to live. Failure would lead to a guilty verdict in the Heavenly court, they would die in this world and be judged in the next. By going to Egypt, they would live, physically, from the food they would secure, and not die in the next world. A first option: Ya’akov was reminding them, and us, of the human obligation to work at living, to do what we can to sustain our lives. His second option takes a more mundane view, we will live well if you find a lot of food to buy, not die if you only find the minimal amount to achieve that. It reminds me of what mori ve-rabi R. Lichtenstein once said about the Yeshiva’s gemach, interest-free loan fund . In encouraging donations to the fund, he said people shouldn’t have to survive on bread alone, it was reasonable to want butter on the bread as well. Here, too, Or HaChayyim thinks Ya’akov is saying, you might get enough for us to live, or, if not, at least not to die. Sorcery may or may not work, but we can find hidden facts in other ways, according to Ibn Ezra. Some people don’t need anything more, but we can find the kinds of gifts they will still relish, Sforno understood. And sometimes we might find only basic sustenance rather than comfort, Or HaChayyim taught us.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 9390 Views
More Results