• The paradigm has shifted! I was suspended for "spreading dangerous misinformation" but it is the truth!

    Join @MdBreathe
    The paradigm has shifted! I was suspended for "spreading dangerous misinformation" but it is the truth! Join @MdBreathe
    0 Comments 0 Shares 729 Views 1
  • The Rebuilding Begins
    Brownstone Institute
    It’s nearly five years after the hell of lockdowns and all that followed. This man-made trauma was shared by everyone but some suffered more than others. Governments and their partners did fine. It’s the rest of society that was robbed of freedom and prosperity.

    The pandemic response resulted in damage and despair on a scale we’ve never before experienced.

    It was all predicted. We fought the policies every step of the way. Brownstone Institute now asks for your support to carry this institution, its mission, and our society to the next stage.

    We are enormously pleased – and you feel it too – that the light seems to be dawning. It’s not just political trends, though that plays a part. It is also the lifting of illusion, the exposure of lies, and the ferreting out of foolishness.

    The winter of despair might indeed be turning to the spring of hope. But the damage is incalculable. The powers that did this are still in charge. The dangers are all around us, from mighty bureaucracies to captured industries to the surveillance state generally.


    Our work is far from over. People are still being de-banked. Some of the best scholars have been purged from academia. Excellent doctors are fighting for their rights. Top journalists have lost publishing venues and scientists have lost grant money. The march toward central bank digital currencies continues. Injury from shots is ubiquitous.

    Goliath is still alive and well, though scared and with less confidence than before.

    The challenge before us is on a scale we’ve not seen in many generations.

    The “epoch of incredulity” – a phrase from Charles Dickens – might be on its way out but we struggle to find that in which we believe. The once-trusted sources of the fallen: media, academia, pharma, political leaders, legacy institutions, and experts. We cannot trust Google or Facebook or any tech giants.

    They were all in on it. We know that now. In such times, we can only turn to truth, facts, evidence, ethics, and the core belief that drives Brownstone Institute: freedom itself.

    Since our founding in the darkest days, we’ve supported the dissidents, the contrary ideas, published real research, and somehow made it around the censors to gain many millions of followers the world over.

    To keep the flame burning, and turn it into a roaring fire of justice, please consider an investment in our work right now. It’s never been more important. We must keep the pressure on and make it clear that we will not comply: not intellectually and not physically.

    We’ve learned this much: we cannot count on the system to fix itself. It requires citizen involvement, contrarian voices, serious community involvement, and a large share of risk-taking. It also requires alternative means of support for those willing to speak out in hard times.

    It’s the only way, and notice how relieved many people in the world are that the US seems to be trying to right itself. The Covid lockdowns were global in scope. The whole world is now clamoring for justice and freedom. It might be coming, with the US leading the way.

    Your past donations to Brownstone have made possible what seemed impossible just a few years ago. Our research has been cited in court cases, a major book by a Supreme Court justice, and major media like the Wall Street Journal, and has been reprinted on viral alternative media sources, in addition to countless reprints in all major languages.

    Much of the research we pushed for years is now discussed daily in the news. Our website, Brownstone.org, stands as a mighty tool for writers the world over, having documented every crime and every bad actor.

    We see now the difference it makes. It’s our view too that our alternative model of institutional structure has been key. We have a tiny staff and the lowest possible operating costs. The priority is on the mission, the message, fellowships, and reach: as a result every dollar of our budget goes toward the mission.

    It’s a new model of nonprofit structure – realizing the vision rather than constructing a fat institution – worthy of attention in every business journal.

    Our society and country – really all countries – have been granted a chance to rebuild and fix what’s gone wrong. We dare not pass it up. We cannot sit back and rely on the politicians to make things better. There is no one hero in which we can vest all hope. Rebuilding freedom is the work of everyone.

    New voices have emerged, and they come from people who are battle-hardened and utterly committed to the task. Brownstone Institute has adopted many of the bravest voices and supported their work for years. Your support for this work makes it possible to continue it. We simply cannot walk away now with the hope that all will be well. The road to recovery is long and arduous but it can be done.

    It was only a few years ago that certain elites in high places began to disparage freedom, even misspelling it as “freedumb.” Your rights to live freely were said to be contrary to public health, security, and science. It was like a dystopian novel come to life, fiction made real before our very eyes.

    Brownstone blasted onto the scene with huge literature reviews proving that lockdowns are only damaging, that masks don’t work, that every nostrum from Plexiglas to mass testing systems has no effect, and that the shots were always based on a forlorn hope of sterilizing a respiratory virus with a zoonotic reservoir.

    It was all fake science, every bit of it from the very beginning. It was deployed for purposes of a power grab by the national security state. They still hold that power, and the target was and is your liberty.

    It needed correcting. Everything about the experience needed exposure and resetting.

    Brownstone Institute literature reviews rattled the establishment, no question, and we came under heavy fire from the usual suspects. So did our scholars, researchers, and working groups on pandemic planning, censorship, and financial centralization.

    We were called every name, and subjected to libelous smears along the way. Some people have said Brownstone is the leading source for “misinformation” on the Internet – the very center of a web – but you know what this means. It means we are independent of the media cartel and report inconvenient truths.

    Despite it all, here we are, not only surviving but thriving. This is entirely thanks to generous donors, without whom nothing could happen.

    In the meantime, we’ve published thousands of studies and 18 books including a suppressed history of medicine by the great historian Harris Coulter. His own publisher took the books out of print during the Covid years but his family stepped up and permitted the reprinting. Now they are available as guides to reform in the years to come.

    Brownstone is on every social media platform, with special emphasis on those that do not censor.

    We held around 50 public events too, and you know the spirit if you have attended. There is warmth, community, intelligence, and confidence in the future. We’ve formed new friendships in the darkest times that will carry us many years in the future.

    So many trends are headed the right way, with many Brownstone writers and scholars leading the way. You surely know the names by now. Some are on all your podcasts and videos and some appear on the nightly news.

    Others are headed now to high positions in the next administration. You know this and you know the names so there is no reason to reprint them all here. Look through a list of our Fellows, scholars, and authors and you will see.

    Responsible giving is always a challenge. When you look where the fortunes of Bill Gates, George Soros, and Jeff Bezos go, it is completely shocking. This is not philanthropy but malanthropy, doing bad rather than doing good.

    But it can be defeated. It’s remarkable to watch the trajectory and power of good ideas as pushed by Brownstone Institute, its Fellows, and partners, with a budget of a tiny fraction of the big players out there, many of whom are government-funded.

    Your contribution to our work – tax-deductible to the full extent allowed – permits a continued flourishing of truth. It worked in the darkest times and it can work even more now that we have begun to see the dawn.

    We only do this push once per year, and much of our plans for next year are determined by the extent of your generosity, without which we could do nothing. If you believe in the cause of human freedom, and its capacity to overcome even the most powerful obstacles, please join us as a donor and supporter.

    Your investment in Brownstone Institute is an investment in the future of civilized life itself.

    Will you donate with your most generous contribution now? Thank you so much for considering. They used to say during the lockdowns that “We are all in this together.” It was propaganda then, but true now: the cause of freedom is something for all of us.

    We truly are all in this together: getting the truth, realizing justice for the wrong done, restoring health, and fighting through the thicket of lies to secure the blessings of freedom now and in the future.

    This is the meaning of your investment in the work of Brownstone Institute.

    Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
    For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.

    Author

    Brownstone Institute is a nonprofit organization conceived of in May 2021 in support of a society that minimizes the role of violence in public life.

    View all posts

    https://brownstone.org/articles/the-rebuilding-begins/
    The Rebuilding Begins Brownstone Institute It’s nearly five years after the hell of lockdowns and all that followed. This man-made trauma was shared by everyone but some suffered more than others. Governments and their partners did fine. It’s the rest of society that was robbed of freedom and prosperity. The pandemic response resulted in damage and despair on a scale we’ve never before experienced. It was all predicted. We fought the policies every step of the way. Brownstone Institute now asks for your support to carry this institution, its mission, and our society to the next stage. We are enormously pleased – and you feel it too – that the light seems to be dawning. It’s not just political trends, though that plays a part. It is also the lifting of illusion, the exposure of lies, and the ferreting out of foolishness. The winter of despair might indeed be turning to the spring of hope. But the damage is incalculable. The powers that did this are still in charge. The dangers are all around us, from mighty bureaucracies to captured industries to the surveillance state generally. Our work is far from over. People are still being de-banked. Some of the best scholars have been purged from academia. Excellent doctors are fighting for their rights. Top journalists have lost publishing venues and scientists have lost grant money. The march toward central bank digital currencies continues. Injury from shots is ubiquitous. Goliath is still alive and well, though scared and with less confidence than before. The challenge before us is on a scale we’ve not seen in many generations. The “epoch of incredulity” – a phrase from Charles Dickens – might be on its way out but we struggle to find that in which we believe. The once-trusted sources of the fallen: media, academia, pharma, political leaders, legacy institutions, and experts. We cannot trust Google or Facebook or any tech giants. They were all in on it. We know that now. In such times, we can only turn to truth, facts, evidence, ethics, and the core belief that drives Brownstone Institute: freedom itself. Since our founding in the darkest days, we’ve supported the dissidents, the contrary ideas, published real research, and somehow made it around the censors to gain many millions of followers the world over. To keep the flame burning, and turn it into a roaring fire of justice, please consider an investment in our work right now. It’s never been more important. We must keep the pressure on and make it clear that we will not comply: not intellectually and not physically. We’ve learned this much: we cannot count on the system to fix itself. It requires citizen involvement, contrarian voices, serious community involvement, and a large share of risk-taking. It also requires alternative means of support for those willing to speak out in hard times. It’s the only way, and notice how relieved many people in the world are that the US seems to be trying to right itself. The Covid lockdowns were global in scope. The whole world is now clamoring for justice and freedom. It might be coming, with the US leading the way. Your past donations to Brownstone have made possible what seemed impossible just a few years ago. Our research has been cited in court cases, a major book by a Supreme Court justice, and major media like the Wall Street Journal, and has been reprinted on viral alternative media sources, in addition to countless reprints in all major languages. Much of the research we pushed for years is now discussed daily in the news. Our website, Brownstone.org, stands as a mighty tool for writers the world over, having documented every crime and every bad actor. We see now the difference it makes. It’s our view too that our alternative model of institutional structure has been key. We have a tiny staff and the lowest possible operating costs. The priority is on the mission, the message, fellowships, and reach: as a result every dollar of our budget goes toward the mission. It’s a new model of nonprofit structure – realizing the vision rather than constructing a fat institution – worthy of attention in every business journal. Our society and country – really all countries – have been granted a chance to rebuild and fix what’s gone wrong. We dare not pass it up. We cannot sit back and rely on the politicians to make things better. There is no one hero in which we can vest all hope. Rebuilding freedom is the work of everyone. New voices have emerged, and they come from people who are battle-hardened and utterly committed to the task. Brownstone Institute has adopted many of the bravest voices and supported their work for years. Your support for this work makes it possible to continue it. We simply cannot walk away now with the hope that all will be well. The road to recovery is long and arduous but it can be done. It was only a few years ago that certain elites in high places began to disparage freedom, even misspelling it as “freedumb.” Your rights to live freely were said to be contrary to public health, security, and science. It was like a dystopian novel come to life, fiction made real before our very eyes. Brownstone blasted onto the scene with huge literature reviews proving that lockdowns are only damaging, that masks don’t work, that every nostrum from Plexiglas to mass testing systems has no effect, and that the shots were always based on a forlorn hope of sterilizing a respiratory virus with a zoonotic reservoir. It was all fake science, every bit of it from the very beginning. It was deployed for purposes of a power grab by the national security state. They still hold that power, and the target was and is your liberty. It needed correcting. Everything about the experience needed exposure and resetting. Brownstone Institute literature reviews rattled the establishment, no question, and we came under heavy fire from the usual suspects. So did our scholars, researchers, and working groups on pandemic planning, censorship, and financial centralization. We were called every name, and subjected to libelous smears along the way. Some people have said Brownstone is the leading source for “misinformation” on the Internet – the very center of a web – but you know what this means. It means we are independent of the media cartel and report inconvenient truths. Despite it all, here we are, not only surviving but thriving. This is entirely thanks to generous donors, without whom nothing could happen. In the meantime, we’ve published thousands of studies and 18 books including a suppressed history of medicine by the great historian Harris Coulter. His own publisher took the books out of print during the Covid years but his family stepped up and permitted the reprinting. Now they are available as guides to reform in the years to come. Brownstone is on every social media platform, with special emphasis on those that do not censor. We held around 50 public events too, and you know the spirit if you have attended. There is warmth, community, intelligence, and confidence in the future. We’ve formed new friendships in the darkest times that will carry us many years in the future. So many trends are headed the right way, with many Brownstone writers and scholars leading the way. You surely know the names by now. Some are on all your podcasts and videos and some appear on the nightly news. Others are headed now to high positions in the next administration. You know this and you know the names so there is no reason to reprint them all here. Look through a list of our Fellows, scholars, and authors and you will see. Responsible giving is always a challenge. When you look where the fortunes of Bill Gates, George Soros, and Jeff Bezos go, it is completely shocking. This is not philanthropy but malanthropy, doing bad rather than doing good. But it can be defeated. It’s remarkable to watch the trajectory and power of good ideas as pushed by Brownstone Institute, its Fellows, and partners, with a budget of a tiny fraction of the big players out there, many of whom are government-funded. Your contribution to our work – tax-deductible to the full extent allowed – permits a continued flourishing of truth. It worked in the darkest times and it can work even more now that we have begun to see the dawn. We only do this push once per year, and much of our plans for next year are determined by the extent of your generosity, without which we could do nothing. If you believe in the cause of human freedom, and its capacity to overcome even the most powerful obstacles, please join us as a donor and supporter. Your investment in Brownstone Institute is an investment in the future of civilized life itself. Will you donate with your most generous contribution now? Thank you so much for considering. They used to say during the lockdowns that “We are all in this together.” It was propaganda then, but true now: the cause of freedom is something for all of us. We truly are all in this together: getting the truth, realizing justice for the wrong done, restoring health, and fighting through the thicket of lies to secure the blessings of freedom now and in the future. This is the meaning of your investment in the work of Brownstone Institute. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author. Author Brownstone Institute is a nonprofit organization conceived of in May 2021 in support of a society that minimizes the role of violence in public life. View all posts https://brownstone.org/articles/the-rebuilding-begins/
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    The Rebuilding Begins ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    Your investment in Brownstone Institute is an investment in the future. Will you donate with your most generous contribution now?
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 19346 Views
  • Facing Fauci's Fury: Q&A with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
    The Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration coauthor stands up to COVID-19 autocrats and disastrous lockdowns by following the science.

    Nick Gillespie4.22.2022 10:15 AM
    On October 4, 2020, when COVID-19 was raging, American schools were mostly shuttered, and vaccines were believed to be years away, a team of top researchers at the world's most prestigious universities—including Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya, Harvard's Martin Kulldorff, and Oxford's Sunetra Gupta—published the Great Barrington Declaration, a controversial open letter challenging the official U.S. response of lockdowns and government control of ever-larger parts of the economy and everyday life.

    Recognizing that COVID overwhelmingly affected elderly Americans and others with specific, identifiable health conditions, they called for a policy of "focused protection," in which the vulnerable would be kept safe and the rest of us, especially children and young adults, would be able to get on with our lives.

    Tesla Excluded From Proposed California EV Buyer Credits

    The response at the very highest levels of government was quick and draconian. Francis Collins, then the director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote a private email to presidential chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci, which was later obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, denouncing Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, and Gupta as "fringe epidemiologists" who deserved to be the subject of a media "takedown."

    "Big tech outlets like Facebook and Google followed suit, suppressing our ideas, falsely deeming them 'misinformation,' says Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford who also holds a Ph.D. in economics. "I started getting calls from reporters asking me why I wanted to 'let the virus rip,' when I had proposed nothing of the sort. I was the target of racist attacks and death threats."

    I sat down with Bhattacharya to talk about what it was like to be at the very center of an official effort to suppress heterodox thinking about the pandemic, why he believes he and his Great Barrington Declaration co-authors have been vindicated, and whether the public health establishment can ever recover from ongoing revelations of incompetence, malfeasance, and politically motivated decision-making. He also discusses how the centralization of science funding encourages dangerous groupthink, why he believes in mRNA vaccines but remains staunchly anti-mandate, and why he stopped wearing masks a long time ago.

    Narrated by Nick Gillespie; edited by Adam Czarnecki; intro by John Osterhoudt; additional graphics by Lex Villena and Isaac Reese

    Photo: CNP/AdMedia/Newscom; gbdeclaration.org; Stefani Reynolds—Pool via CNP/MEGA/Newscom; CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom

    https://reason.com/video/2022/04/22/facing-faucis-fury-qa-with-dr-jay-bhattacharya/
    Facing Fauci's Fury: Q&A with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya The Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration coauthor stands up to COVID-19 autocrats and disastrous lockdowns by following the science. Nick Gillespie4.22.2022 10:15 AM On October 4, 2020, when COVID-19 was raging, American schools were mostly shuttered, and vaccines were believed to be years away, a team of top researchers at the world's most prestigious universities—including Stanford's Jay Bhattacharya, Harvard's Martin Kulldorff, and Oxford's Sunetra Gupta—published the Great Barrington Declaration, a controversial open letter challenging the official U.S. response of lockdowns and government control of ever-larger parts of the economy and everyday life. Recognizing that COVID overwhelmingly affected elderly Americans and others with specific, identifiable health conditions, they called for a policy of "focused protection," in which the vulnerable would be kept safe and the rest of us, especially children and young adults, would be able to get on with our lives. Tesla Excluded From Proposed California EV Buyer Credits The response at the very highest levels of government was quick and draconian. Francis Collins, then the director of the National Institutes of Health, wrote a private email to presidential chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci, which was later obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, denouncing Bhattacharya, Kulldorff, and Gupta as "fringe epidemiologists" who deserved to be the subject of a media "takedown." "Big tech outlets like Facebook and Google followed suit, suppressing our ideas, falsely deeming them 'misinformation,' says Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford who also holds a Ph.D. in economics. "I started getting calls from reporters asking me why I wanted to 'let the virus rip,' when I had proposed nothing of the sort. I was the target of racist attacks and death threats." I sat down with Bhattacharya to talk about what it was like to be at the very center of an official effort to suppress heterodox thinking about the pandemic, why he believes he and his Great Barrington Declaration co-authors have been vindicated, and whether the public health establishment can ever recover from ongoing revelations of incompetence, malfeasance, and politically motivated decision-making. He also discusses how the centralization of science funding encourages dangerous groupthink, why he believes in mRNA vaccines but remains staunchly anti-mandate, and why he stopped wearing masks a long time ago. Narrated by Nick Gillespie; edited by Adam Czarnecki; intro by John Osterhoudt; additional graphics by Lex Villena and Isaac Reese Photo: CNP/AdMedia/Newscom; gbdeclaration.org; Stefani Reynolds—Pool via CNP/MEGA/Newscom; CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom https://reason.com/video/2022/04/22/facing-faucis-fury-qa-with-dr-jay-bhattacharya/
    REASON.COM
    Facing Fauci's Fury: Q&A with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
    On October 4, 2020, when COVID-19 was raging, American schools were mostly shuttered, and vaccines were believed to be years
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 6214 Views
  • Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines
    Rebekah Barnett
    In a surprise move, the local government of West Australian mining town Port Hedland is calling for immediate suspension of the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into evidence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA in the shots.

    At a special meeting on 11 October, Port Hedland councillors voted five to two in favour of notifying all of Australia’s 537 local councils of the evidence of the DNA contamination in the vaccines, and associated risks.

    “We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption,” said the letter, a copy of which was sent to councillors around the country following the vote.

    Letters were also sent to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Covid modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines.

    The Port Hedland Council joins federal independent MP Russell Broadbent in calling for the suspension of the vaccines until an urgent and thorough investigation has been carried out into the DNA contamination matter.

    Port Hedland Councillor Adrian McRae, who brought the motion, said that he hoped the vote “will be the ripple that creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps the world” on the issue of Covid vaccine safety.

    The move comes after independent testing of Australian vials of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines, by Canadian virologist Dr David Speicher, detected residual synthetic DNA at levels up to 145 above the regulatory limit.

    Independent studies in Canada, the US, and Germany had previously tested the mod-RNA vaccines and found excessive levels of DNA, which is a byproduct of the production process and is allowed in amounts of up to 10 nanograms per dose under international regulations.

    In the Pfizer vaccine, there is a DNA sequence called the SV40 enhancer/promoter, which is known for its utility in gene therapies to drive DNA into the nucleus of cells. The SV40 enhancer/promoter (not the same as the SV40 virus) was discovered in the Pfizer vaccine in 2023 by genomics scientist Kevin McKernan and has since been acknowledged by regulators, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Health Canada.

    Responding to these findings, Florida Surgeon General Dr Joseph A. Ladapo petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to halt the Covid mod-RNA vaccine program in December last year.

    However, both the FDA and the TGA deny that the vaccines contain high levels of DNA or that the synthetic DNA poses any safety risks, including the SV40 enhancer/promoter.

    In a statement released after the Port Hedland council vote, the TGA said that it was aware of “misinformation” in recent reporting of the contamination issue and that findings of high levels of residual DNA in the mod-RNA vaccines are “not robust or reliable, and are creating confusion and concern regarding the safety of vaccines.”

    But the TGA did not provide any evidence to support its claims or refute the work of independent scientists who detected the contamination. At the same time, the TGA mischaracterised the scientists’ work and omitted some key, but inconvenient facts from its statement.

    The TGA claimed that it has independently tested 27 batches of mod-RNA vaccines for residual DNA levels and found them to be compliant. However, no one can verify this, because the TGA fully redacted the results when a Freedom of Information (FOI 4558) request compelled their release.

    The TGA misleadingly criticised the use of a testing method called fluorometry in some studies but ignored the evidence of excessive DNA using qPCR, which is the TGA’s preferred method for testing residual DNA levels. The TGA also ignored a step taken by Dr Speicher (the use of an enzyme called Rnase A) to ensure the accuracy of the fluorometry reading.

    The TGA failed to address the implications of residual DNA being encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which go to every major organ system in the body (according to Pfizer’s biodistribution data) and enter the cells (according to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator). And the regulator did not address the presence of the SV40 enhancer/promotor at all.

    West Australian Premier Roger Cook slammed the Port Hedland council for passing the motion to alert Australians to the DNA contamination issue, telling the press that the council had gone “off the rails” and “should stick to its knitting.”

    But Port Hedland residents who attended the special meeting implored the council to take action, as did internationally lauded Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish, in a recorded address in support of the motion.

    Professor Dalgleish, who previously sat on the scientific board of mRNA technology company CureVac, said he had seen an upsurge in aggressive, fast-progressing cancers in his oncology practice amongst patients who had received Covid vaccine boosters, particularly colorectal and blood cancers.

    “We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends, develop testing protocols for those exposed to synthetic DNA contamination, and prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions,” he said.

    The motion to warn Australians of the DNA contamination in the mod-RNA shots was supported by Councillors Adrian McRae, Sven Arentz, Lorraine Butson, Camilo Blanco, and Deputy Mayor Ash Christensen. It was opposed by Mayor Peter Carter and Councillor Ambika Rebello.

    Blanco, who formerly served as Port Hedland Mayor, said he was inundated with calls from other local government areas after the Port Hedland Council motion was passed.

    “I’ve been contacted by so many councils that are ready for this,” he said.

    “They can’t just ignore this. We want genuine answers.”

    A website has been assembled by a group of volunteers with all the Port Hedland council motion information, and resources to equip Australians to take the matter up with their own local governments.

    Visit porthedlandmotion.info to find out more.

    Read a full rebuttal of the TGA’s claims about DNA contamination in the mod-RNA vaccines, here.

    Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
    For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.

    Author

    Rebekah Barnett is a Brownstone Institute fellow, independent journalist and advocate for Australians injured by the Covid vaccines. She holds a BA in Communications from the University of Western Australia, and writes for her Substack, Dystopian Down Under.

    View all posts


    https://brownstone.org/articles/local-government-calls-for-immediate-suspension-of-vaccines/
    Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines Rebekah Barnett In a surprise move, the local government of West Australian mining town Port Hedland is calling for immediate suspension of the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into evidence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA in the shots. At a special meeting on 11 October, Port Hedland councillors voted five to two in favour of notifying all of Australia’s 537 local councils of the evidence of the DNA contamination in the vaccines, and associated risks. “We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption,” said the letter, a copy of which was sent to councillors around the country following the vote. Letters were also sent to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Covid modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines. The Port Hedland Council joins federal independent MP Russell Broadbent in calling for the suspension of the vaccines until an urgent and thorough investigation has been carried out into the DNA contamination matter. Port Hedland Councillor Adrian McRae, who brought the motion, said that he hoped the vote “will be the ripple that creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps the world” on the issue of Covid vaccine safety. The move comes after independent testing of Australian vials of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines, by Canadian virologist Dr David Speicher, detected residual synthetic DNA at levels up to 145 above the regulatory limit. Independent studies in Canada, the US, and Germany had previously tested the mod-RNA vaccines and found excessive levels of DNA, which is a byproduct of the production process and is allowed in amounts of up to 10 nanograms per dose under international regulations. In the Pfizer vaccine, there is a DNA sequence called the SV40 enhancer/promoter, which is known for its utility in gene therapies to drive DNA into the nucleus of cells. The SV40 enhancer/promoter (not the same as the SV40 virus) was discovered in the Pfizer vaccine in 2023 by genomics scientist Kevin McKernan and has since been acknowledged by regulators, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Health Canada. Responding to these findings, Florida Surgeon General Dr Joseph A. Ladapo petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to halt the Covid mod-RNA vaccine program in December last year. However, both the FDA and the TGA deny that the vaccines contain high levels of DNA or that the synthetic DNA poses any safety risks, including the SV40 enhancer/promoter. In a statement released after the Port Hedland council vote, the TGA said that it was aware of “misinformation” in recent reporting of the contamination issue and that findings of high levels of residual DNA in the mod-RNA vaccines are “not robust or reliable, and are creating confusion and concern regarding the safety of vaccines.” But the TGA did not provide any evidence to support its claims or refute the work of independent scientists who detected the contamination. At the same time, the TGA mischaracterised the scientists’ work and omitted some key, but inconvenient facts from its statement. The TGA claimed that it has independently tested 27 batches of mod-RNA vaccines for residual DNA levels and found them to be compliant. However, no one can verify this, because the TGA fully redacted the results when a Freedom of Information (FOI 4558) request compelled their release. The TGA misleadingly criticised the use of a testing method called fluorometry in some studies but ignored the evidence of excessive DNA using qPCR, which is the TGA’s preferred method for testing residual DNA levels. The TGA also ignored a step taken by Dr Speicher (the use of an enzyme called Rnase A) to ensure the accuracy of the fluorometry reading. The TGA failed to address the implications of residual DNA being encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which go to every major organ system in the body (according to Pfizer’s biodistribution data) and enter the cells (according to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator). And the regulator did not address the presence of the SV40 enhancer/promotor at all. West Australian Premier Roger Cook slammed the Port Hedland council for passing the motion to alert Australians to the DNA contamination issue, telling the press that the council had gone “off the rails” and “should stick to its knitting.” But Port Hedland residents who attended the special meeting implored the council to take action, as did internationally lauded Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish, in a recorded address in support of the motion. Professor Dalgleish, who previously sat on the scientific board of mRNA technology company CureVac, said he had seen an upsurge in aggressive, fast-progressing cancers in his oncology practice amongst patients who had received Covid vaccine boosters, particularly colorectal and blood cancers. “We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends, develop testing protocols for those exposed to synthetic DNA contamination, and prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions,” he said. The motion to warn Australians of the DNA contamination in the mod-RNA shots was supported by Councillors Adrian McRae, Sven Arentz, Lorraine Butson, Camilo Blanco, and Deputy Mayor Ash Christensen. It was opposed by Mayor Peter Carter and Councillor Ambika Rebello. Blanco, who formerly served as Port Hedland Mayor, said he was inundated with calls from other local government areas after the Port Hedland Council motion was passed. “I’ve been contacted by so many councils that are ready for this,” he said. “They can’t just ignore this. We want genuine answers.” A website has been assembled by a group of volunteers with all the Port Hedland council motion information, and resources to equip Australians to take the matter up with their own local governments. Visit porthedlandmotion.info to find out more. Read a full rebuttal of the TGA’s claims about DNA contamination in the mod-RNA vaccines, here. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author. Author Rebekah Barnett is a Brownstone Institute fellow, independent journalist and advocate for Australians injured by the Covid vaccines. She holds a BA in Communications from the University of Western Australia, and writes for her Substack, Dystopian Down Under. View all posts https://brownstone.org/articles/local-government-calls-for-immediate-suspension-of-vaccines/
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    Port Hedland is calling for suspension of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into excessive levels of synthetic DNA.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 8426 Views
  • Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines
    Rebekah Barnett
    In a surprise move, the local government of West Australian mining town Port Hedland is calling for immediate suspension of the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into evidence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA in the shots.

    At a special meeting on 11 October, Port Hedland councillors voted five to two in favour of notifying all of Australia’s 537 local councils of the evidence of the DNA contamination in the vaccines, and associated risks.

    “We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption,” said the letter, a copy of which was sent to councillors around the country following the vote.

    Letters were also sent to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Covid modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines.

    The Port Hedland Council joins federal independent MP Russell Broadbent in calling for the suspension of the vaccines until an urgent and thorough investigation has been carried out into the DNA contamination matter.

    Port Hedland Councillor Adrian McRae, who brought the motion, said that he hoped the vote “will be the ripple that creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps the world” on the issue of Covid vaccine safety.

    The move comes after independent testing of Australian vials of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines, by Canadian virologist Dr David Speicher, detected residual synthetic DNA at levels up to 145 above the regulatory limit.

    Independent studies in Canada, the US, and Germany had previously tested the mod-RNA vaccines and found excessive levels of DNA, which is a byproduct of the production process and is allowed in amounts of up to 10 nanograms per dose under international regulations.

    In the Pfizer vaccine, there is a DNA sequence called the SV40 enhancer/promoter, which is known for its utility in gene therapies to drive DNA into the nucleus of cells. The SV40 enhancer/promoter (not the same as the SV40 virus) was discovered in the Pfizer vaccine in 2023 by genomics scientist Kevin McKernan and has since been acknowledged by regulators, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Health Canada.

    Responding to these findings, Florida Surgeon General Dr Joseph A. Ladapo petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to halt the Covid mod-RNA vaccine program in December last year.

    However, both the FDA and the TGA deny that the vaccines contain high levels of DNA or that the synthetic DNA poses any safety risks, including the SV40 enhancer/promoter.

    In a statement released after the Port Hedland council vote, the TGA said that it was aware of “misinformation” in recent reporting of the contamination issue and that findings of high levels of residual DNA in the mod-RNA vaccines are “not robust or reliable, and are creating confusion and concern regarding the safety of vaccines.”

    But the TGA did not provide any evidence to support its claims or refute the work of independent scientists who detected the contamination. At the same time, the TGA mischaracterised the scientists’ work and omitted some key, but inconvenient facts from its statement.

    The TGA claimed that it has independently tested 27 batches of mod-RNA vaccines for residual DNA levels and found them to be compliant. However, no one can verify this, because the TGA fully redacted the results when a Freedom of Information (FOI 4558) request compelled their release.

    The TGA misleadingly criticised the use of a testing method called fluorometry in some studies but ignored the evidence of excessive DNA using qPCR, which is the TGA’s preferred method for testing residual DNA levels. The TGA also ignored a step taken by Dr Speicher (the use of an enzyme called Rnase A) to ensure the accuracy of the fluorometry reading.

    The TGA failed to address the implications of residual DNA being encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which go to every major organ system in the body (according to Pfizer’s biodistribution data) and enter the cells (according to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator). And the regulator did not address the presence of the SV40 enhancer/promotor at all.

    West Australian Premier Roger Cook slammed the Port Hedland council for passing the motion to alert Australians to the DNA contamination issue, telling the press that the council had gone “off the rails” and “should stick to its knitting.”

    But Port Hedland residents who attended the special meeting implored the council to take action, as did internationally lauded Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish, in a recorded address in support of the motion.

    Professor Dalgleish, who previously sat on the scientific board of mRNA technology company CureVac, said he had seen an upsurge in aggressive, fast-progressing cancers in his oncology practice amongst patients who had received Covid vaccine boosters, particularly colorectal and blood cancers.

    “We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends, develop testing protocols for those exposed to synthetic DNA contamination, and prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions,” he said.

    The motion to warn Australians of the DNA contamination in the mod-RNA shots was supported by Councillors Adrian McRae, Sven Arentz, Lorraine Butson, Camilo Blanco, and Deputy Mayor Ash Christensen. It was opposed by Mayor Peter Carter and Councillor Ambika Rebello.

    Blanco, who formerly served as Port Hedland Mayor, said he was inundated with calls from other local government areas after the Port Hedland Council motion was passed.

    “I’ve been contacted by so many councils that are ready for this,” he said.

    “They can’t just ignore this. We want genuine answers.”

    A website has been assembled by a group of volunteers with all the Port Hedland council motion information, and resources to equip Australians to take the matter up with their own local governments.

    Visit porthedlandmotion.info to find out more.

    Read a full rebuttal of the TGA’s claims about DNA contamination in the mod-RNA vaccines, here.

    Author

    Rebekah Barnett is a Brownstone Institute fellow, independent journalist and advocate for Australians injured by the Covid vaccines. She holds a BA in Communications from the University of Western Australia, and writes for her Substack, Dystopian Down Under.

    View all posts
    Donate Today

    Your financial backing of Brownstone Institute goes to support writers, lawyers, scientists, economists, and other people of courage who have been professionally purged and displaced during the upheaval of our times. You can help get the truth out through their ongoing work.

    DONATE


    https://brownstone.org/articles/local-government-calls-for-immediate-suspension-of-vaccines/
    Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines Rebekah Barnett In a surprise move, the local government of West Australian mining town Port Hedland is calling for immediate suspension of the Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into evidence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA in the shots. At a special meeting on 11 October, Port Hedland councillors voted five to two in favour of notifying all of Australia’s 537 local councils of the evidence of the DNA contamination in the vaccines, and associated risks. “We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption,” said the letter, a copy of which was sent to councillors around the country following the vote. Letters were also sent to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Covid modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines. The Port Hedland Council joins federal independent MP Russell Broadbent in calling for the suspension of the vaccines until an urgent and thorough investigation has been carried out into the DNA contamination matter. Port Hedland Councillor Adrian McRae, who brought the motion, said that he hoped the vote “will be the ripple that creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps the world” on the issue of Covid vaccine safety. The move comes after independent testing of Australian vials of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines, by Canadian virologist Dr David Speicher, detected residual synthetic DNA at levels up to 145 above the regulatory limit. Independent studies in Canada, the US, and Germany had previously tested the mod-RNA vaccines and found excessive levels of DNA, which is a byproduct of the production process and is allowed in amounts of up to 10 nanograms per dose under international regulations. In the Pfizer vaccine, there is a DNA sequence called the SV40 enhancer/promoter, which is known for its utility in gene therapies to drive DNA into the nucleus of cells. The SV40 enhancer/promoter (not the same as the SV40 virus) was discovered in the Pfizer vaccine in 2023 by genomics scientist Kevin McKernan and has since been acknowledged by regulators, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Health Canada. Responding to these findings, Florida Surgeon General Dr Joseph A. Ladapo petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to halt the Covid mod-RNA vaccine program in December last year. However, both the FDA and the TGA deny that the vaccines contain high levels of DNA or that the synthetic DNA poses any safety risks, including the SV40 enhancer/promoter. In a statement released after the Port Hedland council vote, the TGA said that it was aware of “misinformation” in recent reporting of the contamination issue and that findings of high levels of residual DNA in the mod-RNA vaccines are “not robust or reliable, and are creating confusion and concern regarding the safety of vaccines.” But the TGA did not provide any evidence to support its claims or refute the work of independent scientists who detected the contamination. At the same time, the TGA mischaracterised the scientists’ work and omitted some key, but inconvenient facts from its statement. The TGA claimed that it has independently tested 27 batches of mod-RNA vaccines for residual DNA levels and found them to be compliant. However, no one can verify this, because the TGA fully redacted the results when a Freedom of Information (FOI 4558) request compelled their release. The TGA misleadingly criticised the use of a testing method called fluorometry in some studies but ignored the evidence of excessive DNA using qPCR, which is the TGA’s preferred method for testing residual DNA levels. The TGA also ignored a step taken by Dr Speicher (the use of an enzyme called Rnase A) to ensure the accuracy of the fluorometry reading. The TGA failed to address the implications of residual DNA being encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which go to every major organ system in the body (according to Pfizer’s biodistribution data) and enter the cells (according to the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator). And the regulator did not address the presence of the SV40 enhancer/promotor at all. West Australian Premier Roger Cook slammed the Port Hedland council for passing the motion to alert Australians to the DNA contamination issue, telling the press that the council had gone “off the rails” and “should stick to its knitting.” But Port Hedland residents who attended the special meeting implored the council to take action, as did internationally lauded Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish, in a recorded address in support of the motion. Professor Dalgleish, who previously sat on the scientific board of mRNA technology company CureVac, said he had seen an upsurge in aggressive, fast-progressing cancers in his oncology practice amongst patients who had received Covid vaccine boosters, particularly colorectal and blood cancers. “We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends, develop testing protocols for those exposed to synthetic DNA contamination, and prepare treatment pathways for the inevitable rise in vaccine-induced conditions,” he said. The motion to warn Australians of the DNA contamination in the mod-RNA shots was supported by Councillors Adrian McRae, Sven Arentz, Lorraine Butson, Camilo Blanco, and Deputy Mayor Ash Christensen. It was opposed by Mayor Peter Carter and Councillor Ambika Rebello. Blanco, who formerly served as Port Hedland Mayor, said he was inundated with calls from other local government areas after the Port Hedland Council motion was passed. “I’ve been contacted by so many councils that are ready for this,” he said. “They can’t just ignore this. We want genuine answers.” A website has been assembled by a group of volunteers with all the Port Hedland council motion information, and resources to equip Australians to take the matter up with their own local governments. Visit porthedlandmotion.info to find out more. Read a full rebuttal of the TGA’s claims about DNA contamination in the mod-RNA vaccines, here. Author Rebekah Barnett is a Brownstone Institute fellow, independent journalist and advocate for Australians injured by the Covid vaccines. She holds a BA in Communications from the University of Western Australia, and writes for her Substack, Dystopian Down Under. View all posts Donate Today Your financial backing of Brownstone Institute goes to support writers, lawyers, scientists, economists, and other people of courage who have been professionally purged and displaced during the upheaval of our times. You can help get the truth out through their ongoing work. DONATE https://brownstone.org/articles/local-government-calls-for-immediate-suspension-of-vaccines/
    BROWNSTONE.ORG
    Local Government Calls for Immediate Suspension of Vaccines ⋆ Brownstone Institute
    Port Hedland is calling for suspension of Moderna and Pfizer Covid vaccines pending an investigation into excessive levels of synthetic DNA.
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 1 Shares 8567 Views
More Results