• LOL
    LOL
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 151 Views
  • ON VACCINES - THE NOT SO DISTANT PAST
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/hMMdrLolLwSj/
    ON VACCINES - THE NOT SO DISTANT PAST https://www.bitchute.com/video/hMMdrLolLwSj/
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 346 Views
  • Ana Maria Mihalcea promotes EDTA infusions, also for children!

    Bryan Ardis recommends the #EDTA oral pills 💊 that contain a Pfizer patent with "timed-release" technology and biosesors for internal tracking!

    So let's get into it!

    EDTA patent:
    https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2005027832A2/en

    The patent contains a drug delivery system and controlled release nanotechnology called Eudragit-L-100 NF which are coated nanoparticles.

    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27525928/

    The EDTA pill patent also contains an ACE inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker and a chlorophyll synthesis blocker. 
    Calcium Channel Blockers prevent calcium from interacting with the body’s calcium receptors and inhibits the influx of calcium ions into muscle cells. This can cause stiffness in muscles, loss of muscle control and even seizures.
    Chlorophyll synthesis blockers prevent the body from generating new red blood cells. And that is a huge problem since the COVID nanotech is destroying red blood cells.

    EDTA contains one of the most toxic Beta Blockers called Propranolol, a sodium channel blocker that also crosses the blood-brain barrier.

    The EDTA patent also states that it causes the body to dump salt and water, inducing dehydration.

    A 10-year review (2006 to 2015) of "double-dose" ingestions from the California Poison Control System revealed that antihypertensives like beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers caused moderate to severe effects in 37 percent of cases.

    https://www.uptodate.com/contents/beta-blocker-poisoning

    EDTA contains Aluminium in a form of Alumina which is a synthetically produced aluminum oxide. EDTA also contains Aluminum Stearate which is an aluminum salt of stearic acid. These are toxic metals.

    EDTA contains D-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) which is widely applied as a multifunctional drug carrier for nanomedicine. 

    EDTA also contains “human serum albumin,” a protein found in human blood. 😱

    https://t.me/c/2089089872/2110
    Ana Maria Mihalcea promotes EDTA infusions, also for children! Bryan Ardis recommends the #EDTA oral pills 💊 that contain a Pfizer patent with "timed-release" technology and biosesors for internal tracking! So let's get into it! EDTA patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2005027832A2/en The patent contains a drug delivery system and controlled release nanotechnology called Eudragit-L-100 NF which are coated nanoparticles. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27525928/ The EDTA pill patent also contains an ACE inhibitor, a calcium channel blocker and a chlorophyll synthesis blocker.  Calcium Channel Blockers prevent calcium from interacting with the body’s calcium receptors and inhibits the influx of calcium ions into muscle cells. This can cause stiffness in muscles, loss of muscle control and even seizures. Chlorophyll synthesis blockers prevent the body from generating new red blood cells. And that is a huge problem since the COVID nanotech is destroying red blood cells. EDTA contains one of the most toxic Beta Blockers called Propranolol, a sodium channel blocker that also crosses the blood-brain barrier. The EDTA patent also states that it causes the body to dump salt and water, inducing dehydration. A 10-year review (2006 to 2015) of "double-dose" ingestions from the California Poison Control System revealed that antihypertensives like beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers caused moderate to severe effects in 37 percent of cases. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/beta-blocker-poisoning EDTA contains Aluminium in a form of Alumina which is a synthetically produced aluminum oxide. EDTA also contains Aluminum Stearate which is an aluminum salt of stearic acid. These are toxic metals. EDTA contains D-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) which is widely applied as a multifunctional drug carrier for nanomedicine.  EDTA also contains “human serum albumin,” a protein found in human blood. 😱 https://t.me/c/2089089872/2110
    WO2005027832A2 - Edta containing compositions and uses thereof - Google Patents
    EDTA and EDTA related compositions and methods of using them are described herein. The compositions can have improved bioavailability over EDTA alone. The compositions can be useful in the treatment or prevention of atherosclerosis or for the treatment of heavy metal accumulation.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 3231 Views
  • ☆Tadabbur Kalamullah 17 Rejab 1445H☆

    قُلۡ هَلۡ یَسۡتَوِی ٱلَّذِینَ یَعۡلَمُونَ وَٱلَّذِینَ لَا یَعۡلَمُونَۗ إِنَّمَا یَتَذَكَّرُ أُو۟لُوا۟ ٱلۡأَلۡبَـٰبِ

    "Katakanlah lagi (kepadanya): "Adakah sama orang-orang yang mengetahui dengan orang-orang yang tidak mengetahui?" Sesungguhnya orang-orang yang dapat mengambil pelajaran dan peringatan hanyalah orang-orang yang berakal sempurna" [Surah az-Zumar 9]

    #Bicara berkaitan kemuliaan dan penghormatan terhadap para ulamak disambung lagi.

    #Di alam kesultanan Melayu Nusantara, sebahagian besar ulamak telah berperanan sebagai penasihat istana sehingga beberapa perkara seperti penyebaran dakwah, pengajian ilmu Islam, pelaksanaan pentadbiran Islam dan penguatkuasan Syariat dapat dibuat sehingga Daulah yang dibina berdiri kukuh. Ini sebagaimana peranan Syed Hussein Jamadil Kubra di Kelantan, Sunan Giri dan Sunan Gunung Jati di Demak, Sheikh Mansor di Tidore dan Sheikh Nuruddin ar-Raniry di Aceh, begitulah berperanan mempengaruhi Raja terhadap pemupukan kehidupan beragama.

    #Lebih daripada itu, dimuliakan kedudukan para ulamak dengan melantik mereka sebagai pemerintah. Pelantikan para ulamak seperti Tengku Mohammad sebagai Sultan Perlak, Sultan Syarif Ali sebagai Sultan Brunei, Syarif Kebungsuwan sebagai Sultan Mindanao, anak-cucu Syed Jaafar as-Sadiq sebagai Sultan-sultan di Tidore, Bachan, Ternate dan Jailolo serta Sunan Fatahillah sebagai Sultan Demak, adalah contoh pembentukan Daulah Islam dengan para ulamak menjadi Raja dan Sultan.

    #Inilah kehebatan pemimpin dahulu dalam menghormati ulamak dan kehebatan ulamak yang dinobatkan sebagai pemimpin.

    #Ketahuilah bahawa ulamak adalah pewaris tugas dan peranan sekalian nabi dan rasul dalam menyampaikan amanah Islam kepada seluruh umat manusia. Di tangan ulamaklah penentu kepada maju mundurnya sesebuah negara, terang gelapnya sesebuah bangsa, baik buruknya sesuatu umat di bumi ini.

    #Jika ulamak berperanan sebagaimana berperanannya para nabi dan rasul, akan baiklah pemimpin dan umat berkenaan. Sebaliknya, jika ulamak itu tidak berfungsi dan berperanan jelik, nescaya akan buruk dan binasalah pemimpin dan umat berkenaan.

    ♡Setiap pemimpin dan rakyat hendaklah merujuk terlebih dahulu kepada ulamak dalam sebarang persoalan hidup, samada persoalan duniawi mahupun ukhrawi. Jadikanlah ulamak sebagai obor yang menerangi seluruh kehidupan kita♡

    🐊Ust naim
    Klik link ini untuk    
    http://bit.ly/tadabburkalamullah

    Facebook:   
    https://m.facebook.com/tadabburkalamullah
    ☆Tadabbur Kalamullah 17 Rejab 1445H☆ قُلۡ هَلۡ یَسۡتَوِی ٱلَّذِینَ یَعۡلَمُونَ وَٱلَّذِینَ لَا یَعۡلَمُونَۗ إِنَّمَا یَتَذَكَّرُ أُو۟لُوا۟ ٱلۡأَلۡبَـٰبِ "Katakanlah lagi (kepadanya): "Adakah sama orang-orang yang mengetahui dengan orang-orang yang tidak mengetahui?" Sesungguhnya orang-orang yang dapat mengambil pelajaran dan peringatan hanyalah orang-orang yang berakal sempurna" [Surah az-Zumar 9] #Bicara berkaitan kemuliaan dan penghormatan terhadap para ulamak disambung lagi. #Di alam kesultanan Melayu Nusantara, sebahagian besar ulamak telah berperanan sebagai penasihat istana sehingga beberapa perkara seperti penyebaran dakwah, pengajian ilmu Islam, pelaksanaan pentadbiran Islam dan penguatkuasan Syariat dapat dibuat sehingga Daulah yang dibina berdiri kukuh. Ini sebagaimana peranan Syed Hussein Jamadil Kubra di Kelantan, Sunan Giri dan Sunan Gunung Jati di Demak, Sheikh Mansor di Tidore dan Sheikh Nuruddin ar-Raniry di Aceh, begitulah berperanan mempengaruhi Raja terhadap pemupukan kehidupan beragama. #Lebih daripada itu, dimuliakan kedudukan para ulamak dengan melantik mereka sebagai pemerintah. Pelantikan para ulamak seperti Tengku Mohammad sebagai Sultan Perlak, Sultan Syarif Ali sebagai Sultan Brunei, Syarif Kebungsuwan sebagai Sultan Mindanao, anak-cucu Syed Jaafar as-Sadiq sebagai Sultan-sultan di Tidore, Bachan, Ternate dan Jailolo serta Sunan Fatahillah sebagai Sultan Demak, adalah contoh pembentukan Daulah Islam dengan para ulamak menjadi Raja dan Sultan. #Inilah kehebatan pemimpin dahulu dalam menghormati ulamak dan kehebatan ulamak yang dinobatkan sebagai pemimpin. #Ketahuilah bahawa ulamak adalah pewaris tugas dan peranan sekalian nabi dan rasul dalam menyampaikan amanah Islam kepada seluruh umat manusia. Di tangan ulamaklah penentu kepada maju mundurnya sesebuah negara, terang gelapnya sesebuah bangsa, baik buruknya sesuatu umat di bumi ini. #Jika ulamak berperanan sebagaimana berperanannya para nabi dan rasul, akan baiklah pemimpin dan umat berkenaan. Sebaliknya, jika ulamak itu tidak berfungsi dan berperanan jelik, nescaya akan buruk dan binasalah pemimpin dan umat berkenaan. ♡Setiap pemimpin dan rakyat hendaklah merujuk terlebih dahulu kepada ulamak dalam sebarang persoalan hidup, samada persoalan duniawi mahupun ukhrawi. Jadikanlah ulamak sebagai obor yang menerangi seluruh kehidupan kita♡ 🐊Ust naim Klik link ini untuk     http://bit.ly/tadabburkalamullah Facebook:    https://m.facebook.com/tadabburkalamullah
    BIT.LY
    Tadabbur Kalamullah
    Oleh Ustaz Muhamad Naim Haji Hashim
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 5190 Views
  • Dr. Robert Young on MasterPeace and the Hexagon


    Tests worldwide confirm the exponential increase in man made pollutants rampant in our ecosystem. Worse, we now live in a world of nanometer sized pollution, capable of intracellular poisoning. Never before have our bodies been host to such bioavailable toxic elements invading us at a molecular level. The biggest player in this assault is heavy metals. These “forever chemicals”, situated, at times, inside the cell cause a displacement of natural minerals mandatory for proper functioning.
    The king of binders is natural Clinoptilolite Zeolite. And while powdered zeolites have been available for years the quality has been sketchy and they usually don’t get past the gut wall due to particle size. Additionally, zeolite must be properly prepared to be effective.

    MasterPeace Nano Zeolite Plus Marine Plasma is a Zeolite and Detox Game-Changer.

    To Purchase MasterPeace or Human Consciousness Support products contact who you heard about us from for their affiliate link!

    MasterPeace Social Media Groups:
    Telegram Link: https://t.me/masterpeacebyhcs
    Facebook Main Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/235836669061851
    Facebook Pets Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/784760153290171
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/masterpeacebyhcs/
    Gab Social: https://gab.com/MasterPeacebyHCS

    Videos:
    Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-4748258
    Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7A49FBlzVcnflG4Nn0tfZQ


    https://rumble.com/v49v4hc-dr.-robert-young-on-masterpeace-and-the-hexagon.html
    Dr. Robert Young on MasterPeace and the Hexagon Tests worldwide confirm the exponential increase in man made pollutants rampant in our ecosystem. Worse, we now live in a world of nanometer sized pollution, capable of intracellular poisoning. Never before have our bodies been host to such bioavailable toxic elements invading us at a molecular level. The biggest player in this assault is heavy metals. These “forever chemicals”, situated, at times, inside the cell cause a displacement of natural minerals mandatory for proper functioning. The king of binders is natural Clinoptilolite Zeolite. And while powdered zeolites have been available for years the quality has been sketchy and they usually don’t get past the gut wall due to particle size. Additionally, zeolite must be properly prepared to be effective. MasterPeace Nano Zeolite Plus Marine Plasma is a Zeolite and Detox Game-Changer. To Purchase MasterPeace or Human Consciousness Support products contact who you heard about us from for their affiliate link! MasterPeace Social Media Groups: Telegram Link: https://t.me/masterpeacebyhcs Facebook Main Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/235836669061851 Facebook Pets Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/784760153290171 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/masterpeacebyhcs/ Gab Social: https://gab.com/MasterPeacebyHCS Videos: Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-4748258 Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7A49FBlzVcnflG4Nn0tfZQ https://rumble.com/v49v4hc-dr.-robert-young-on-masterpeace-and-the-hexagon.html
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 4226 Views
  • SEJARAH RASULULLAH SAW :


    Nabi Muhammad SAW
    Pemimpin politik Arab dan
    Pengasas Islam

    Nabi Muhammad bin Abdullah
    (570 M - 8 Jun 632 M)
    Baginda juga adalah pemimpin yang menyatukan Semenanjung Arab kepada satu tatanegara di bawah pemerintahan Islam.
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dianggap oleh umat Islam sebagai pemulih keimanan monoteistik ajaran nabi-nabi terdahulu yang dibawa oleh Nabi Adam, Nabi Nuh, Nabi Ibrahim, Nabi Musa, Nabi Isa dan nabi-nabi yang terdahulu.

    Nabi Muhammad Bin Abdullāh
    KELAHIRAN :
    12 Rabiulawal Tahun Gajah (20 April 571)
    Mekkah, Semenanjung Arab
    (kini Arab Saudi)

    WAFATNYA RASULULLAH SAW :
    8 Jun 632
    Madinah, Semenanjung Arab
    (kini Arab Saudi)

    SEBAB KEWAFATAN :
    Sakit (demam panas)

    RASULULLAH SAW DIKEBUMIKAN :
    Makam di Masjid Nabawi, Madinah.

    NAMA-NAMA LAIN RASULULLAH SAW :
    1. Al-Amin,
    2. As-Saadiq,
    3. RASUL Allāh
    4. Abu al-Qasim dan ada banyak lagi sebenarnya 201.

    UMUR PASANGAN RASULULLAH SAW
    KETIKA BERNIKAH :
    1. Khadijah binti Khuwailid
    40 Tahun (555-619).

    2. Saudah binti Zam'ah
    50 Tahun (619-632).

    3. Aisyah binti Abu Bakar Al-Siddiq
    9 tahun (619-632).

    4. Hafsah binti Umar Al-Khattab
    19 Tahun (624-632).

    5. Zainab binti Khuzaimah
    29 Tahun (625-627).

    6. Zainab binti Jansyin
    35 Tahun (627-632).

    7. Juwairiah binti Al-Harith
    19 Tahun (628-632).

    8. Ramlah binti Abu Sufian
    32 Tahun (628-632).

    9. Hindun binti Abi Umaiyah
    28 Tahun (629-632).

    10. Raihanah binti Zaid
    (629-631)

    11. Safiyah binti Huyay
    16 Tahun (629-632).

    12. Maimunah binti Al-Harith
    25 Tahun (630-632).

    13. Mariyah al-Qibthiyah
    (630-632).

    IBU BAPA RASULULLAH SAW :
    AYAH : Abdullah bin Abdul Muttalib
    IBU : Āminah bt Wahab


    SEJARAH RINGKAS :

    DILAHIRKAN DI MAKKAH DAN DIJAGA :
    Semenanjung Arab,
    Baginda adalah anak yatim piatu sejak kecil lagi dimana baginda dijaga oleh
    1. datuknya, Abdul Muttalib bin Hasyim dan 2. seterusnya bapa saudara baginda,
    Abu Talib bin Abdul Muttalib.

    Baginda juga pernah bekerja sebagai pengembala kambing dan saudagar serta perkahwinan pertamanya adalah ketika berusia 25 tahun dimana baginda telah bernikah dengan Khadijah binti Khuwailid (40 tahun).

    Keluarga baginda mengamalkan ajaran Tauhid yang dibawa oleh Nabi Isa AS daripada Allah SWT.


    WAHYU PERTAMA :
    Ketika Nabi Muhammad berumur 40 tahun, baginda telah menerima wahyu yang pertama daripada Tuhan melalui malaikat Jibril (malaikat yang sama menyampaikan wahyu Allah SWT kepada 5 orang Rasul Ulul Azmi) ketika sedang berada di Gua Hira.


    BERDAKWAH :
    Tiga tahun setelah kejadian itu,
    baginda mula berdakwah secara terbuka kepada penduduk Makkah dengan mengatakan
    "Tuhan itu Esa"
    dan hendaklah menyerahkan diri sepenuhnya kepada Allah SWT
    (secara harfiahnya membawa maksud Islam) dan ia adalah satu cara hidup (الدين ad-Din) yang diterima Allah SWT sahaja.

    Nabi Muhammad SAW menerima beberapa orang pengikut pada awalnya yang terdiri daripada pelbagai golongan.

    Ajaran yang dibawa oleh baginda mendapat tentangan yang hebat dalam kalangan penduduk Makkah malahan mereka dilayan dengan teruk dan zalim.
    Oleh itu, Nabi Muhammad SAW telah menghantar beberapa orang pengikutnya ke Habsyah pada 614 M


    HIJRAH :
    sebelum baginda dan pengikutnya lain di Makkah Hijrah ke Madinah
    (dahulu dikenali sebagai Yathrib) pada tahun 622 M.

    Peristiwa penghijrahan Baginda itu menandakan permulaan bagi kalendar Islam atau takwim Hijrah.

    Di Madinah, Baginda telah menyatukan semua suku kaum dibawah Piagam Madinah.


    KEMBALI KE MEKKAH SEMULA :
    Setelah bersengketa dengan penduduk Makkah selama 8 tahun,
    Baginda membawa 10,000 pengikutnya ke Makkah serta membukanya.
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dan para pengikutnya telah memusnahkan patung berhala yang terdapat di Makkah.

    KEWAFATAN RASULULLAH SAW :
    Pada tahun 632 M, beberapa bulan selepas Haji Wida atau Haji Perpisahan,
    Nabi Muhammad SAW telah jatuh sakit
    lalu wafat.

    Ketika kematian Baginda,
    hampir seluruh Semenanjung Arab berada di bawah naungan Islam dan bersatu dengan utuhnya
    (6 Mei 570M atau pun 20 April/26 April 571M).


    KETURUNAN IBU DAN AYAH
    RASULULLAH SAW :
    Ibu Baginda,
    iaitu Aminah binti Wahab,
    adalah anak perempuan kepada
    Wahab bin Abdul Manaf dari keluarga Zahrah.

    Ayah Baginda,
    iaitu Abdullah,
    ialah anak kepada Abdul Muthalib. Keturunannya dikatakan bersusur galur dari Nabi Ismail, anak kepada Nabi Ibrahim kira-kira dalam keturunan keempat puluh.

    Ayah Baginda telah meninggal sebelum kelahiran Baginda.
    Sementara ibu Baginda meninggal ketika Baginda berusia kira-kira enam tahun, menjadikannya seorang anak yatim piatu.


    IBU SUSUAN RASULULLAH SAW :
    Menurut tradisi keluarga atasan Mekkah, Baginda telah dipelihara oleh seorang ibu angkat

    IBU SUSU :
    wanita yang menyusukan baginda yang bernama Halimahtus Sa'adiah di kampung halamannya di pergunungan selama beberapa tahun.

    RASULULLAH SAW DI JAGA :
    Dalam tahun-tahun itu, baginda telah dibawa ke Makkah untuk mengunjungi ibu Baginda Aminah binti Wahab.

    Setelah ibu Baginda wafat,
    Baginda dijaga oleh
    datuknya, Abdul Muthalib.

    Apabila datuknya meninggal,
    Baginda dijaga oleh bapa saudara Baginda, Abu Talib.

    Ketika inilah Baginda sering kali membantu mengembala kambing-kambing bapa saudara Baginda di sekitar Mekkah dan kerap menemani bapa saudara Baginda dalam urusan perdagangan ke Syam (Syria).


    MASA REMAJA RASULULLAH SAW :
    Dalam masa remaja Baginda,
    Nabi Muhammad SAW percaya sepenuhnya dengan keesaan Allah SWT.

    Baginda hidup dengan cara amat sederhana dan membenci sifat-sifat angkuh dan bongkak.
    Baginda mengamalkan ajaran-ajaran Nabi-Nabi terdahulu terutamanya
    Nabi Isa Al-Masih.

    YANG RASULULLAH SAW SAYANG :
    Baginda menyayangi
    1. orang-orang miskin,
    2. para janda dan
    3. anak-anak yatim serta berkongsi penderitaan mereka dengan berusaha menolong mereka.

    Baginda juga menghindari semua kejahatan yang menjadi amalan biasa di kalangan para belia pada masa itu seperti berjudi, meminum minuman keras, berkelakuan kasar dan lain-lain,
    sehingga Baginda dikenali sebagai
    As Saadiq (yang benar) dan
    Al Amin (yang amanah).

    Baginda sentiasa dipercayai sebagai orang tengah kepada dua pihak yang bertelingkah di kampung halamannya di Mekkah.


    BAGINDA BERUMAHTANGGA :
    Ketika berusia kira-kira 25 tahun,
    ayah saudara Baginda menyarankan Baginda untuk bekerja dengan kafilah
    (rombongan perniagaan) yang dimiliki oleh seorang janda yang bernama Khadijah. Baginda diterima bekerja dan bertanggungjawab terhadap pelayaran ke Syam (Syria).
    Baginda mengelolakan urusniaga itu dengan penuh bijaksana dan pulang dengan keuntungan luar biasa.

    ISTERI DAN ANAK RASULULLAH SAW PERTAMA:
    Khadijah begitu tertarik dengan kejujuran dan watak peribadinya yang mendorong beliau untuk menawarkan diri untuk mengahwini Baginda.
    Baginda menerima lamarannya dan perkahwinan mereka adalah bahagia.

    Mereka dikurniakan 6 orang anak
    (2 lelaki dan 4 perempuan) tetapi kedua-dua anak lelaki mereka,
    Qasim dan Abdullah meninggal semasa kecil.
    Manakala anak perempuan baginda ialah Ruqayyah, Zainab, Ummu Kalsum dan Fatimah az-Zahra.

    Khadijah merupakan satu-satunya isterinya sehinggalah Khadijah meninggal pada
    usia 64 tahun.


    ANAK RASULULLAH SAW DENGAN
    MARIA AL-QIBTIYYAH :
    Seorang lagi anak Baginda adalah hasil perkahwinan Baginda dengan
    Maria al-Qibtiyyah.
    Putera Baginda bersama Maria bernama Ibrahim itu juga meninggal semasa kecil. Isteri-isteri baginda dikenali sebagai "Ummul Mukminin" yang bermaksud
    "ibu orang-orang beriman".

    BAPA DAN IBU SAUDARA
    NABI MUHAMMAD SAW :
    Al-Harith bin Abdul Muttalib
    Muqaddam bin Abdul Muttalib
    Zubair bin Abdul Muttalib
    Hamzah bin Abdul Muttalib
    Al-Abbas bin Abdul Muttalib
    Abu Thalib bin Abdul Muttalib
    Abu Lahab bin Abdul Muttalib
    Abdul Kaabah bin Abdul Muttalib
    Hijin bin Abdul Muttalib
    Dhirar bin Abdul Muttalib
    Ghaidaq bin Abdul Muttalib
    Safiyah binti Abdul Muttalib
    'Atikah binti Abdul Muttalib
    Arwa binti Abdul Muttalib
    Umaimah binti Abdul Muttalib
    Barrah binti Abdul Muttalib
    Ummi Hakim al-Bidha binti Abdul Muttalib
    Hashim bin Abdu'Manan


    KERASULAN :
    Nabi Muhammad SAW telah dilahirkan di tengah-tengah masyarakat jahiliyah.
    Ia sungguh menyedihkan hati Baginda sehingga Baginda kerapkali ke Gua Hira, sebuah gua bukit dekat Makkah,
    yang kemudian dikenali sebagai
    Jabal al-Nour,
    untuk memikirkan cara untuk mengatasi gejala yang dihadapi masyarakatnya.

    Di sinilah Baginda sering bertapa serta berfikir dengan mendalam, memohon kepada Allah SWT supaya memusnahkan kedurjanaan yang kian berleluasa.


    WAHYU PERTAMA :
    Pada suatu malam hari Isnin 21 Ramadan (bersamaan 10 Ogos 610),
    ketika Baginda sedang bertafakur
    di Gua Hira,

    Malaikat Jibril mendatangi Baginda.
    Jibril membangkitkan Baginda dan menyampaikan wahyu Allah SWT
    di telinganya.
    Baginda diminta membaca.

    Baginda menjawab,
    "Saya tidak tahu membaca".

    Jibril mengulangi tiga kali meminta
    Nabi Muhammad SAW untuk membaca tetapi jawapan Baginda tetap sama.

    Baginda menjawab,
    "Saya tidak tahu membaca".

    Akhirnya, Jibril berkata :
    "Bacalah dengan menyebut nama Tuhanmu yang menciptakan manusia dari segumpal darah.
    Bacalah, dengan nama Tuhanmu yang Amat Pemurah
    yang mengajar manusia dengan perantaraan
    (menulis, membaca).
    Dia mengajarkan kepada manusia
    apa yang tidak diketahuinya."

    Ini merupakan wahyu pertama yang diterima oleh Nabi Muhammad SAW.
    Ketika itu baginda berusia 40 tahun setengah.


    WAHYU TURUN SELAMA 23 TAHUN :
    Wahyu itu turun kepada Baginda dari semasa ke semasa dalam jangka masa
    23 tahun.

    Siri wahyu ini telah diturunkan menurut panduan yang diberikan kepada
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dan dikumpulkan dalam buku bernama Al Mushaf yang juga dinamakan Al-Quran (bacaan).


    AL-QURAN DAN AL SUNNAH :
    Kebanyakkan ayat-ayatnya mempunyai
    erti yang jelas.
    Sebahagiannya diterjemah dan dihubungkan dengan ayat-ayat yang lain. Sebahagiannya pula diterjemah oleh
    Nabi Muhammad SAW sendiri melalui percakapan Baginda,
    tindakan dan persetujuan yang terkenal, dengan nama Sunnah.

    Al-Quran dan al Sunnah digabungkan bersama untuk menjadi panduan dan cara hidup mereka yang menyerahkan diri kepada Allah SWT.


    BERDAKWAH :
    Marhalah dakwah baginda boleh dibahagikan mengikut fasa:

    Fasa di Makkah: hampir 13 tahun
    Dakwah rahsia: 3 tahun
    Dakwah terbuka di Makkah: hampir 7 tahun
    Dakwah kepada semua: 3 tahun
    Fasa Madinah: 10 tahun

    Perjuangan dakwah Nabi Muhammad SAW juga boleh diringkaskan sebagai berikut :

    Pertama:
    Marhalah Tasqif -
    tahap pembinaan dan pengkaderan untuk melahirkan individu-individu yang menyakini pemikiran (fikrah) dan metod (thariqah) parti politik guna membentuk kerangka gerakan.

    Kedua:
    Marhalah Tafa’ul ma’al Ummah -
    tahap berinteraksi dengan umat agar umat turut sama memikul kewajiban dakwah Islam, sehingga umat akan menjadikan Islam sebagai panduan utama dalam hidupnya serta berusaha untuk menerapkannya dalam kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat.

    Ketiga:
    Marhalah Istilamil Hukmi -
    tahap pengambilalihan kekuasaan, dan penerapan Islam secara utuh serta menyeluruh, lalu mengembangkannya sebagai risalah Islam ke seluruh penjuru dunia.

    didalam kitab sirah dan merupakan satu aktiviti penting dalam marhalah kedua perjuangan Nabi Muhammad SAW
    Lestari atau tidaknya dakwah ditentukan oleh Baginda kerana keberlangsungan dakwah memerlukan dua aspek penting :

    Pertama :
    untuk mendapatkan perlindungan (himayah) sehingga tetap dapat melakukan aktiviti dakwah dalam keadaan aman dan terlindung.

    Kedua :
    untuk mencapai tampuk pemerintahan dalam rangka menegakkan Daulah Islamiyah (Negara Islam) dan menerapkan hukum-hukum berdasarkan apa yang telah diturunkan Allah SWT dalam kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat.

    CABARAN BERDAKWAH :
    Apabila Nabi Muhammad SAW menyeru manusia ke jalan Allah SWT,
    tidak ramai yang mendengar seruannya.

    Kebanyakkan pengikut Baginda adalah dari anggota keluarga Baginda dan dari golongan masyarakat bawahan,
    Antara mereka ialah Khadijah, Ali, Zaid dan Bilal.

    Apabila Baginda memperhebatkan kegiatan dakwah Baginda dengan mengumumkan secara terbuka
    Agama Islam yang disebarkan Baginda, dengan itu ramai yang mengikut Baginda.

    Tetapi pada masa, Baginda menghadapi berbagai cabaran dari kalangan bangsawan dan para pemimpin yang merasakan kedudukan mereka terancam.
    Mereka bangkit bersama untuk mempertahankan agama datuk nenek mereka.

    Semangat penganut Islam meningkat apabila sekumpulan kecil masyarakat yang dihormati di Makkah menganut Agama Islam.

    Antara mereka ialah Abu Bakar, Uthman bin Affan, Zubair bin Al Awwam, Abdul Rahman bin Auf, Ubaidillah bin Harith, Amr bin Nufail dan ramai lagi.

    Akibat cabaran dari masyarakat jahiliyah di Mekkah, sebahagian orang Islam disiksa, dianiaya, disingkir dan dipulaukan.

    Baginda terpaksa bersabar dan mencari perlindungan untuk pengikutnya.
    Baginda meminta Negus Raja Habsyah, untuk membenarkan orang-orang Islam berhijrah ke negaranya.
    Negus mengalu-alukan ketibaan mereka dan tidak membenarkan mereka diserah kepada penguasa di Makkah.

    HIJRAH :
    Di Makkah terdapat Kaabah yang telah dibina oleh Nabi Ibrahim a.s.
    beberapa abad lalu sebagai pusat penyatuan umat untuk beribadat kepada Allah SWT.
    Sebelumnya ia dijadikan oleh masyarakat jahiliyah sebagai tempat sembahyang selain dari Allah SWT.

    Mereka datang dari berbagai daerah Arab, mewakili berbagai suku ternama.
    Ziarah ke Kaabah dijadikan mereka sebagai sebuah pesta tahunan.
    Orang ramai bertemu dan berhibur dengan kegiatan-kegiatan tradisi mereka dalam kunjungan ini.

    Baginda mengambil peluang ini untuk menyebarkan Islam.
    Antara mereka yang tertarik dengan seruan Baginda ialah sekumpulan orang dari Yathrib (Madinah).

    Mereka menemui Baginda dan beberapa orang Islam dari Mekah di desa bernama Aqabah secara sembunyi-sembunyi.

    Setelah menganut Islam, mereka bersumpah untuk melindungi Islam,
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dan orang-orang Islam Mekkah.

    Tahun berikutnya, sekumpulan masyarakat Islam dari Yathrib datang lagi ke Makkah. Mereka menemui Nabi Muhammad di tempat yang mereka bertemu sebelumnya. Kali ini, Abbas bin Abdul Muthalib,
    pakcik Baginda yang belum menganut Islam hadir dalam pertemuan itu.
    Mereka mengundang Baginda dan orang-orang Islam Mekkah untuk berhijrah ke Yathrib.

    Mereka berjanji akan melayani mereka sebagai saudara seAgama.
    Dialog yang memakan masa agak lama diadakan antara mayarakat Islam Yathrib dengan pakcik Nabi Muhammad SAW untuk memastikan mereka sesungguhnya berhasrat mengalu-alukan masyarakat Islam Mekkah di bandar mereka.
    Nabi Muhammad SAW akhirnya bersetuju untuk berhijrah beramai-ramai ke bandar baru itu.


    HIJRAH KE MADINAH (YATHRIB) :
    Mengetahui ramai masyarakat Islam merancang meninggalkan Makkah, masyarakat jahiliyah Mekkah cuba menghalang mereka.
    Namun kumpulan pertama telahpun berjaya berhijrah ke Yathrib.
    Masyarakat jahiliyah Mekkah bimbang hijrah ke Yathrib akan memberi peluang kepada orang Islam untuk mengembangkan Agama mereka ke daerah-daerah yang lain.

    Hampir dua bulan seluruh masyarakat Islam dari Makkah kecuali
    Nabi Muhammad SAW, Abu Bakar, Ali dan beberapa orang yang daif, telah berhijrah.


    RANCANGAN MEMBUNUH
    RASULULLAH SAW :
    Masyarakat Mekkah kemudian memutuskan untuk membunuh Baginda. Mereka merancang namun tidak berjaya. Dengan berbagai taktik dan rancangan yang teratur,
    Nabi Muhammad SAW akhirnya sampai dengan selamat ke Yathrib, yang kemudian dikenali sebagai, 'Bandar Rasulullah SAW'.


    MADINAH :
    Di Madinah, kerajaan Islam diwujudkan di bawah pimpinan Baginda umat Islam bebas mengerjakan solat di Madinah.

    Musyrikin Makkah mengetahui akan perkara ini kemudiannya melancarkan beberapa serangan ke atas Madinah tetapi kesemuanya ditangkis dengan mudah oleh umat Islam.

    Satu perjanjian kemudiannya dibuat dengan memihak kepada pihak Quraish Makkah.
    Walau bagaimanapun perjanjian itu dicabuli oleh mereka dengan menyerang sekutu umat Islam.
    Orang Muslim pada ketika ini menjadi semakin kuat telah membuat keputusan untuk menyerang musyrikin Makkah memandangkan perjanjian telah dicabuli.


    PEMBUKAAN KOTA MAKKAH :
    Pada tahun kelapan selepas penghijrahan ke Madinah berlaku,
    Nabi Muhammad SAW berlepas ke Makkah.

    Tentera Islam yang seramai 10,000 orang tiba di Makkah dengan penuh bersemangat.
    Takut akan nyawa mereka terkorban, penduduk Makkah bersetuju untuk menyerahkan kota Makkah tanpa sebarang syarat.
    Nabi Muhammad SAW kemudian mengarahkan supaya kesemua berhala dan patung-patung di sekeliling Kaabah dimusnahkan.


    MENELADANI PERBUATAN
    NABI MUHAMMAD SAW :
    Perbuatan-perbuatan yang dilakukan
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dibagi menjadi dua cara.
    Ada yang termasuk perbuatan-perbuatan jibiliyah, iaitu perbuatan yang dilakukan manusia secara Fitriah, dan ada pula perbuatan-perbuatan selain jibiliyah.

    Perbuatan-perbuatan jibiliyah,
    seperti berdiri, duduk, makan, minum dan lain sebagainya, tidak ada perselisihan bahawa status perbuatan tersebut adalah mubah (harus), baik bagi
    Nabi Muhammad SAW maupun bagi umatnya.
    Oleh kerana itu, perbuatan tersebut tidak termasuk dalam kategori mandub (sunat).

    Sedangkan perbuatan-perbuatan yang bukan jibiliyah, boleh jadi termasuk dalam hal-hal yang ditetapkan khusus bagi
    Nabi Muhammad SAW, dimana tidak seorang pun diperkenankan mengikutinya (haram);
    atau boleh jadi tidak termasuk dalam perbuatan yang diperuntukkan khusus bagi Baginda.


    KHUSUS BAGI RASULULLAH SAW :
    Apabila perbuatan itu telah ditetapkan khusus bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW,
    seperti dibolehkan Baginda melanjutkan puasa pada malam hari tanpa berbuka, atau dibolehkannya menikah dengan lebih dari empat wanita, dan lain sebagainya dari kekhususan Baginda;
    maka dalam hal ini kita tidak diperkenankan mengikuti Baginda.

    Sebab,
    perbuatan-perbuatan tersebut telah terbukti diperuntukkan khusus bagi Baginda berdasarkan Ijmak Sahabat.
    Oleh kerana itu tidak dibolehkan meneladani Baginda dalam perbuatan-perbuatan semacam ini.

    Akan halnya dengan perbuatan Baginda yang kita kenal sebagai penjelas bagi kita, tidak ada perselisihan bahawa hal itu merupakan dalil.
    Dalam hal ini penjelasan tersebut boleh berupa perkataan, seperti

    RASULULLAH SAW BERSABDA :
    “ Solatlah kalian sebagaimana kalian melihat aku solat ”.

    RASULULLAH SAW BERSABDA
    " Laksanakan manasik hajimu berdasarkan manasikku (apa yang telah aku kerjakan) ".

    Hadis ini menunjukkan bahawa perbuatan Baginda merupakan penjelas,
    agar kita mengikutinya.

    Penjelasan Baginda boleh juga berupa qaraain al ahwal, yakni qarinah/perbuatan yang menerangkan bentuk perbuatan, seperti memotong pergelangan pencuri sebagai penjelas,

    ALLAH SWT BERFIRMAN :
    " Maka potonglah tangan keduanya ."
    (SURAH AL-MAIDAH : 38)

    Status penjelas yang terdapat dalam perbuatan Baginda, baik berupa ucapan maupun perbuatan yang menerangkan bentuk perbuatan, dapat mengikuti hukum apa yang telah dijelaskan, apakah itu
    wajib,
    haram,
    mandub(sunat) atau
    mubah(harus) sesuai dengan arah penunjukan dalil.

    Sedangkan perbuatan-perbuatan Baginda yang tidak terdapat di dalamnya perbuatan yang menunjukkan bahawa hal itu merupakan penjelas,
    bukan penolakan dan bukan pula ketetapan.
    Maka dalam hal ini perlu diperhatikan apakah di dalamnya terdapat maksud untuk bertaqarrub
    (mendekatkan diri kepada Allah SWT)
    atau tidak.
    Apabila di dalamnya terdapat keinginan untuk bertaqarrub kepada Allah SWT
    maka perbuatan itu termasuk mandub (sunat),
    di mana seseorang akan mendapatkan pahala atas perbuatannya itu dan tidak mendapatkan balasan jika meninggalkannya.

    Misalnya Solat Duha.
    Sedangkan jika tidak terdapat di
    dalamnya keinginan untuk bertaqarrub, maka perbuatan tersebut termasuk
    mubah (harus).

    PESANAN TERAKHIR MUHAMMAD
    (ISI KHUTBAH TERAKHIR MUHAMMAD) :
    Ketika Nabi Muhammad SAW
    mengerjakan ibadah haji yang terakhir,
    maka pada 9 Zulhijjah tahun 10 hijarah
    di Lembah Uranah, Bukit Arafah,
    Baginda menyampaikan khutbah terakhirnya di hadapan kaum Muslimin,
    di antara isi dari khutbah terakhir
    Nabi Muhammad SAW itu ialah:

    " Wahai manusia,
    dengarlah baik-baik apa yang hendak ku katakan, Aku tidak mengetahui apakah aku dapat bertemu lagi dengan kamu semua selepas tahun ini.

    Oleh itu, dengarlah dengan teliti kata-kataku ini dan sampaikanlah ia kepada orang-orang yang tidak dapat hadir disini pada hari ini.

    1. "Wahai manusia, sepertimana kamu menganggap bulan ini dan kota ini sebagai suci, anggaplah jiwa dan harta setiap orang Muslim sebagai amanah suci.

    2. Kembalikan harta yang diamanahkan kepada kamu kepada pemiliknya yang berhak.

    3. Janganlah kamu sakiti sesiapapun agar orang lain tidak menyakiti kamu lagi.

    4. Ingatlah bahawa sesungguhya kamu akan menemui Tuhan kamu dan DIA pasti membuat perhitungan di atas segala amalan kamu.

    5. Allah SWT telah mengharamkan riba, oleh itu, segala urusan yang melibatkan riba dibatalkan mulai sekarang.

    6. "Berwaspadalah terhadap syaitan demi keselamatan agama kamu.
    syaitan telah berputus asa untuk menyesatkan kamu dalam perkara-perkara besar,
    maka berjaga-jagalah supaya kamu tidak mengikutinya dalam perkara-perkara kecil.

    7. "Wahai manusia sebagaimana kamu mempunyai hak atas isteri kamu,
    mereka juga mempunyai hak ke atas kamu. Sekiranya mereka menyempurnakan hak mereka ke atas kamu,
    maka mereka juga berhak diberikan makan dan pakaian, dalam suasana kasih sayang.
    Layanilah wanita-wanita kamu dengan baik dan berlemah-lembutlah terhadap mereka kerana sesungguhnya mereka adalah teman dan pembantu kamu yang setia.
    Dan hak kamu atas mereka ialah mereka sama sekali tidak boleh memasukkan orang yang kamu tidak sukai ke dalam rumah kamu dan dilarang melakukan zina.

    8. "Wahai manusia,
    dengarlah bersungguh-sungguh kata-kataku ini,
    sembahlah Allah SWT,
    dirikanlah solat lima waktu,
    berpuasalah di bulan Ramadhan, dan tunaikanlah zakat dari harta kekayaan kamu.
    Kerjakanlah ibadah haji sekiranya kamu mampu.

    9. Ketahuilah bahawa setiap Muslim adalah saudara kepada Muslim yang lain.
    Kamu semua adalah sama;
    tidak seorang pun yang lebih mulia dari yang lainnya kecuali dalam Taqwa dan beramal soleh.

    10. "Ingatlah, bahawa kamu akan menghadap Allah SWT pada suatu hari untuk dipertanggungjawabkan diatas segala apa yang telah kamu kerjakan.
    Oleh itu, awasilah agar jangan sekali-kali kamu terkeluar dari landasan kebenaran selepas ketiadaanku.

    11. "Wahai manusia,
    tidak ada lagi Nabi atau Rasul yang akan datang selepasku dan tidak akan lahir Agama baru.

    Oleh itu wahai manusia.
    Nilailah dengan betul dan fahamilah kata-kataku yang telah aku sampaikan kepada kamu.

    Sesungguhnya aku tinggalkan kepada kamu dua perkara, yang sekiranya kamu berpegang teguh dan mengikuti kedua-duanya, nescaya kamu tidak akan tersesat selama-lamanya.
    Itulah Al-Qur'an dan Sunnahku.

    12. "Hendaklah orang-orang yang mendengar ucapanku, menyampaikan pula kepada orang lain.
    Semoga yang terakhir lebih memahami kata-kataku dari mereka yang terus mendengar dariku.

    Saksikanlah Ya Allah,
    bahawasanya telah aku sampaikan risalah-MU kepada hamba-hamba-MU."


    RINGKASAN PERKEMBANGAN ISLAM :
    570M-
    Nabi Muhammad SAW dilahirkan.

    610M-
    Nabi Muhammad SAW menerima wahyu pertama di Gua Hira'.

    615M-
    Orang Muslim didera oleh puak Quraish.
    Hijrah pertama ke Habsyah.

    616M-
    Sayidina Hamzah dan
    Saidina Umar memeluk Islam.
    Hijrah kedua ke Habsyah.

    619M-
    Khadijah ra (isteri Baginda) dan
    Abu Talib (bapa saudara Baginda)
    meninggal dunia.
    Melawat Taif.
    Peristiwa Isra dan Mi'raj berlaku.

    621M-
    Baiat Aqabah 1.

    622M-
    Baiat Aqabah 2.
    Hijrah ke Madinah.
    Daulah Islamiyah dibina.

    624M-
    Perang Badar.

    625M-
    Perang Uhud.

    627M-
    Perang Ahzab.

    628M-
    Perjanjian Hudaibiyah.

    629M-
    Perang Khaibar dan dalam menentang tentera Rom Byzantine,
    Baginda menghantar tentera Islam dalam Perang Mu'tah.

    630M-
    Pembukaan Makkah.
    Perang Hunain.

    631M-
    Perang Tabuk.

    632M-
    Kewafatan RASULULLAH SAW,
    perlantikan Syaidina Abu Bakar sebagai khalifah.


    KEWAFATAN SAHABAT
    RASULULLAH SAW :

    1. Ali bin Abi Thalib
    lahir di Makkah
    Wafat 40 H

    2. Hasan bin Ali
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 50 H

    3. Husain bin Ali
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 61 H

    4. Ali bin Husain
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 95 H

    5. Muhammad al-Baqir
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 114

    6. Ja’far ash-Shadiq
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 148

    7. Musa al-Kadzim
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 183 H

    8. Ali ar-Ridha
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 203 H

    9. Muhammad al-Jawad
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 220 H

    10. Ali al-Hadi
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 254 H

    11. Hasan al-Asykari
    lahir di Madinah
    Wafat 260 H

    12. Muhammad bin al-Asykari
    Samarra, Irak
    Lahir 255 H atau 868 M
    SEJARAH RASULULLAH SAW : Nabi Muhammad SAW Pemimpin politik Arab dan Pengasas Islam Nabi Muhammad bin Abdullah (570 M - 8 Jun 632 M) Baginda juga adalah pemimpin yang menyatukan Semenanjung Arab kepada satu tatanegara di bawah pemerintahan Islam. Nabi Muhammad SAW dianggap oleh umat Islam sebagai pemulih keimanan monoteistik ajaran nabi-nabi terdahulu yang dibawa oleh Nabi Adam, Nabi Nuh, Nabi Ibrahim, Nabi Musa, Nabi Isa dan nabi-nabi yang terdahulu. Nabi Muhammad Bin Abdullāh KELAHIRAN : 12 Rabiulawal Tahun Gajah (20 April 571) Mekkah, Semenanjung Arab (kini Arab Saudi) WAFATNYA RASULULLAH SAW : 8 Jun 632 Madinah, Semenanjung Arab (kini Arab Saudi) SEBAB KEWAFATAN : Sakit (demam panas) RASULULLAH SAW DIKEBUMIKAN : Makam di Masjid Nabawi, Madinah. NAMA-NAMA LAIN RASULULLAH SAW : 1. Al-Amin, 2. As-Saadiq, 3. RASUL Allāh 4. Abu al-Qasim dan ada banyak lagi sebenarnya 201. UMUR PASANGAN RASULULLAH SAW KETIKA BERNIKAH : 1. Khadijah binti Khuwailid 40 Tahun (555-619). 2. Saudah binti Zam'ah 50 Tahun (619-632). 3. Aisyah binti Abu Bakar Al-Siddiq 9 tahun (619-632). 4. Hafsah binti Umar Al-Khattab 19 Tahun (624-632). 5. Zainab binti Khuzaimah 29 Tahun (625-627). 6. Zainab binti Jansyin 35 Tahun (627-632). 7. Juwairiah binti Al-Harith 19 Tahun (628-632). 8. Ramlah binti Abu Sufian 32 Tahun (628-632). 9. Hindun binti Abi Umaiyah 28 Tahun (629-632). 10. Raihanah binti Zaid (629-631) 11. Safiyah binti Huyay 16 Tahun (629-632). 12. Maimunah binti Al-Harith 25 Tahun (630-632). 13. Mariyah al-Qibthiyah (630-632). IBU BAPA RASULULLAH SAW : AYAH : Abdullah bin Abdul Muttalib IBU : Āminah bt Wahab SEJARAH RINGKAS : DILAHIRKAN DI MAKKAH DAN DIJAGA : Semenanjung Arab, Baginda adalah anak yatim piatu sejak kecil lagi dimana baginda dijaga oleh 1. datuknya, Abdul Muttalib bin Hasyim dan 2. seterusnya bapa saudara baginda, Abu Talib bin Abdul Muttalib. Baginda juga pernah bekerja sebagai pengembala kambing dan saudagar serta perkahwinan pertamanya adalah ketika berusia 25 tahun dimana baginda telah bernikah dengan Khadijah binti Khuwailid (40 tahun). Keluarga baginda mengamalkan ajaran Tauhid yang dibawa oleh Nabi Isa AS daripada Allah SWT. WAHYU PERTAMA : Ketika Nabi Muhammad berumur 40 tahun, baginda telah menerima wahyu yang pertama daripada Tuhan melalui malaikat Jibril (malaikat yang sama menyampaikan wahyu Allah SWT kepada 5 orang Rasul Ulul Azmi) ketika sedang berada di Gua Hira. BERDAKWAH : Tiga tahun setelah kejadian itu, baginda mula berdakwah secara terbuka kepada penduduk Makkah dengan mengatakan "Tuhan itu Esa" dan hendaklah menyerahkan diri sepenuhnya kepada Allah SWT (secara harfiahnya membawa maksud Islam) dan ia adalah satu cara hidup (الدين ad-Din) yang diterima Allah SWT sahaja. Nabi Muhammad SAW menerima beberapa orang pengikut pada awalnya yang terdiri daripada pelbagai golongan. Ajaran yang dibawa oleh baginda mendapat tentangan yang hebat dalam kalangan penduduk Makkah malahan mereka dilayan dengan teruk dan zalim. Oleh itu, Nabi Muhammad SAW telah menghantar beberapa orang pengikutnya ke Habsyah pada 614 M HIJRAH : sebelum baginda dan pengikutnya lain di Makkah Hijrah ke Madinah (dahulu dikenali sebagai Yathrib) pada tahun 622 M. Peristiwa penghijrahan Baginda itu menandakan permulaan bagi kalendar Islam atau takwim Hijrah. Di Madinah, Baginda telah menyatukan semua suku kaum dibawah Piagam Madinah. KEMBALI KE MEKKAH SEMULA : Setelah bersengketa dengan penduduk Makkah selama 8 tahun, Baginda membawa 10,000 pengikutnya ke Makkah serta membukanya. Nabi Muhammad SAW dan para pengikutnya telah memusnahkan patung berhala yang terdapat di Makkah. KEWAFATAN RASULULLAH SAW : Pada tahun 632 M, beberapa bulan selepas Haji Wida atau Haji Perpisahan, Nabi Muhammad SAW telah jatuh sakit lalu wafat. Ketika kematian Baginda, hampir seluruh Semenanjung Arab berada di bawah naungan Islam dan bersatu dengan utuhnya (6 Mei 570M atau pun 20 April/26 April 571M). KETURUNAN IBU DAN AYAH RASULULLAH SAW : Ibu Baginda, iaitu Aminah binti Wahab, adalah anak perempuan kepada Wahab bin Abdul Manaf dari keluarga Zahrah. Ayah Baginda, iaitu Abdullah, ialah anak kepada Abdul Muthalib. Keturunannya dikatakan bersusur galur dari Nabi Ismail, anak kepada Nabi Ibrahim kira-kira dalam keturunan keempat puluh. Ayah Baginda telah meninggal sebelum kelahiran Baginda. Sementara ibu Baginda meninggal ketika Baginda berusia kira-kira enam tahun, menjadikannya seorang anak yatim piatu. IBU SUSUAN RASULULLAH SAW : Menurut tradisi keluarga atasan Mekkah, Baginda telah dipelihara oleh seorang ibu angkat IBU SUSU : wanita yang menyusukan baginda yang bernama Halimahtus Sa'adiah di kampung halamannya di pergunungan selama beberapa tahun. RASULULLAH SAW DI JAGA : Dalam tahun-tahun itu, baginda telah dibawa ke Makkah untuk mengunjungi ibu Baginda Aminah binti Wahab. Setelah ibu Baginda wafat, Baginda dijaga oleh datuknya, Abdul Muthalib. Apabila datuknya meninggal, Baginda dijaga oleh bapa saudara Baginda, Abu Talib. Ketika inilah Baginda sering kali membantu mengembala kambing-kambing bapa saudara Baginda di sekitar Mekkah dan kerap menemani bapa saudara Baginda dalam urusan perdagangan ke Syam (Syria). MASA REMAJA RASULULLAH SAW : Dalam masa remaja Baginda, Nabi Muhammad SAW percaya sepenuhnya dengan keesaan Allah SWT. Baginda hidup dengan cara amat sederhana dan membenci sifat-sifat angkuh dan bongkak. Baginda mengamalkan ajaran-ajaran Nabi-Nabi terdahulu terutamanya Nabi Isa Al-Masih. YANG RASULULLAH SAW SAYANG : Baginda menyayangi 1. orang-orang miskin, 2. para janda dan 3. anak-anak yatim serta berkongsi penderitaan mereka dengan berusaha menolong mereka. Baginda juga menghindari semua kejahatan yang menjadi amalan biasa di kalangan para belia pada masa itu seperti berjudi, meminum minuman keras, berkelakuan kasar dan lain-lain, sehingga Baginda dikenali sebagai As Saadiq (yang benar) dan Al Amin (yang amanah). Baginda sentiasa dipercayai sebagai orang tengah kepada dua pihak yang bertelingkah di kampung halamannya di Mekkah. BAGINDA BERUMAHTANGGA : Ketika berusia kira-kira 25 tahun, ayah saudara Baginda menyarankan Baginda untuk bekerja dengan kafilah (rombongan perniagaan) yang dimiliki oleh seorang janda yang bernama Khadijah. Baginda diterima bekerja dan bertanggungjawab terhadap pelayaran ke Syam (Syria). Baginda mengelolakan urusniaga itu dengan penuh bijaksana dan pulang dengan keuntungan luar biasa. ISTERI DAN ANAK RASULULLAH SAW PERTAMA: Khadijah begitu tertarik dengan kejujuran dan watak peribadinya yang mendorong beliau untuk menawarkan diri untuk mengahwini Baginda. Baginda menerima lamarannya dan perkahwinan mereka adalah bahagia. Mereka dikurniakan 6 orang anak (2 lelaki dan 4 perempuan) tetapi kedua-dua anak lelaki mereka, Qasim dan Abdullah meninggal semasa kecil. Manakala anak perempuan baginda ialah Ruqayyah, Zainab, Ummu Kalsum dan Fatimah az-Zahra. Khadijah merupakan satu-satunya isterinya sehinggalah Khadijah meninggal pada usia 64 tahun. ANAK RASULULLAH SAW DENGAN MARIA AL-QIBTIYYAH : Seorang lagi anak Baginda adalah hasil perkahwinan Baginda dengan Maria al-Qibtiyyah. Putera Baginda bersama Maria bernama Ibrahim itu juga meninggal semasa kecil. Isteri-isteri baginda dikenali sebagai "Ummul Mukminin" yang bermaksud "ibu orang-orang beriman". BAPA DAN IBU SAUDARA NABI MUHAMMAD SAW : Al-Harith bin Abdul Muttalib Muqaddam bin Abdul Muttalib Zubair bin Abdul Muttalib Hamzah bin Abdul Muttalib Al-Abbas bin Abdul Muttalib Abu Thalib bin Abdul Muttalib Abu Lahab bin Abdul Muttalib Abdul Kaabah bin Abdul Muttalib Hijin bin Abdul Muttalib Dhirar bin Abdul Muttalib Ghaidaq bin Abdul Muttalib Safiyah binti Abdul Muttalib 'Atikah binti Abdul Muttalib Arwa binti Abdul Muttalib Umaimah binti Abdul Muttalib Barrah binti Abdul Muttalib Ummi Hakim al-Bidha binti Abdul Muttalib Hashim bin Abdu'Manan KERASULAN : Nabi Muhammad SAW telah dilahirkan di tengah-tengah masyarakat jahiliyah. Ia sungguh menyedihkan hati Baginda sehingga Baginda kerapkali ke Gua Hira, sebuah gua bukit dekat Makkah, yang kemudian dikenali sebagai Jabal al-Nour, untuk memikirkan cara untuk mengatasi gejala yang dihadapi masyarakatnya. Di sinilah Baginda sering bertapa serta berfikir dengan mendalam, memohon kepada Allah SWT supaya memusnahkan kedurjanaan yang kian berleluasa. WAHYU PERTAMA : Pada suatu malam hari Isnin 21 Ramadan (bersamaan 10 Ogos 610), ketika Baginda sedang bertafakur di Gua Hira, Malaikat Jibril mendatangi Baginda. Jibril membangkitkan Baginda dan menyampaikan wahyu Allah SWT di telinganya. Baginda diminta membaca. Baginda menjawab, "Saya tidak tahu membaca". Jibril mengulangi tiga kali meminta Nabi Muhammad SAW untuk membaca tetapi jawapan Baginda tetap sama. Baginda menjawab, "Saya tidak tahu membaca". Akhirnya, Jibril berkata : "Bacalah dengan menyebut nama Tuhanmu yang menciptakan manusia dari segumpal darah. Bacalah, dengan nama Tuhanmu yang Amat Pemurah yang mengajar manusia dengan perantaraan (menulis, membaca). Dia mengajarkan kepada manusia apa yang tidak diketahuinya." Ini merupakan wahyu pertama yang diterima oleh Nabi Muhammad SAW. Ketika itu baginda berusia 40 tahun setengah. WAHYU TURUN SELAMA 23 TAHUN : Wahyu itu turun kepada Baginda dari semasa ke semasa dalam jangka masa 23 tahun. Siri wahyu ini telah diturunkan menurut panduan yang diberikan kepada Nabi Muhammad SAW dan dikumpulkan dalam buku bernama Al Mushaf yang juga dinamakan Al-Quran (bacaan). AL-QURAN DAN AL SUNNAH : Kebanyakkan ayat-ayatnya mempunyai erti yang jelas. Sebahagiannya diterjemah dan dihubungkan dengan ayat-ayat yang lain. Sebahagiannya pula diterjemah oleh Nabi Muhammad SAW sendiri melalui percakapan Baginda, tindakan dan persetujuan yang terkenal, dengan nama Sunnah. Al-Quran dan al Sunnah digabungkan bersama untuk menjadi panduan dan cara hidup mereka yang menyerahkan diri kepada Allah SWT. BERDAKWAH : Marhalah dakwah baginda boleh dibahagikan mengikut fasa: Fasa di Makkah: hampir 13 tahun Dakwah rahsia: 3 tahun Dakwah terbuka di Makkah: hampir 7 tahun Dakwah kepada semua: 3 tahun Fasa Madinah: 10 tahun Perjuangan dakwah Nabi Muhammad SAW juga boleh diringkaskan sebagai berikut : Pertama: Marhalah Tasqif - tahap pembinaan dan pengkaderan untuk melahirkan individu-individu yang menyakini pemikiran (fikrah) dan metod (thariqah) parti politik guna membentuk kerangka gerakan. Kedua: Marhalah Tafa’ul ma’al Ummah - tahap berinteraksi dengan umat agar umat turut sama memikul kewajiban dakwah Islam, sehingga umat akan menjadikan Islam sebagai panduan utama dalam hidupnya serta berusaha untuk menerapkannya dalam kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat. Ketiga: Marhalah Istilamil Hukmi - tahap pengambilalihan kekuasaan, dan penerapan Islam secara utuh serta menyeluruh, lalu mengembangkannya sebagai risalah Islam ke seluruh penjuru dunia. didalam kitab sirah dan merupakan satu aktiviti penting dalam marhalah kedua perjuangan Nabi Muhammad SAW Lestari atau tidaknya dakwah ditentukan oleh Baginda kerana keberlangsungan dakwah memerlukan dua aspek penting : Pertama : untuk mendapatkan perlindungan (himayah) sehingga tetap dapat melakukan aktiviti dakwah dalam keadaan aman dan terlindung. Kedua : untuk mencapai tampuk pemerintahan dalam rangka menegakkan Daulah Islamiyah (Negara Islam) dan menerapkan hukum-hukum berdasarkan apa yang telah diturunkan Allah SWT dalam kehidupan bernegara dan bermasyarakat. CABARAN BERDAKWAH : Apabila Nabi Muhammad SAW menyeru manusia ke jalan Allah SWT, tidak ramai yang mendengar seruannya. Kebanyakkan pengikut Baginda adalah dari anggota keluarga Baginda dan dari golongan masyarakat bawahan, Antara mereka ialah Khadijah, Ali, Zaid dan Bilal. Apabila Baginda memperhebatkan kegiatan dakwah Baginda dengan mengumumkan secara terbuka Agama Islam yang disebarkan Baginda, dengan itu ramai yang mengikut Baginda. Tetapi pada masa, Baginda menghadapi berbagai cabaran dari kalangan bangsawan dan para pemimpin yang merasakan kedudukan mereka terancam. Mereka bangkit bersama untuk mempertahankan agama datuk nenek mereka. Semangat penganut Islam meningkat apabila sekumpulan kecil masyarakat yang dihormati di Makkah menganut Agama Islam. Antara mereka ialah Abu Bakar, Uthman bin Affan, Zubair bin Al Awwam, Abdul Rahman bin Auf, Ubaidillah bin Harith, Amr bin Nufail dan ramai lagi. Akibat cabaran dari masyarakat jahiliyah di Mekkah, sebahagian orang Islam disiksa, dianiaya, disingkir dan dipulaukan. Baginda terpaksa bersabar dan mencari perlindungan untuk pengikutnya. Baginda meminta Negus Raja Habsyah, untuk membenarkan orang-orang Islam berhijrah ke negaranya. Negus mengalu-alukan ketibaan mereka dan tidak membenarkan mereka diserah kepada penguasa di Makkah. HIJRAH : Di Makkah terdapat Kaabah yang telah dibina oleh Nabi Ibrahim a.s. beberapa abad lalu sebagai pusat penyatuan umat untuk beribadat kepada Allah SWT. Sebelumnya ia dijadikan oleh masyarakat jahiliyah sebagai tempat sembahyang selain dari Allah SWT. Mereka datang dari berbagai daerah Arab, mewakili berbagai suku ternama. Ziarah ke Kaabah dijadikan mereka sebagai sebuah pesta tahunan. Orang ramai bertemu dan berhibur dengan kegiatan-kegiatan tradisi mereka dalam kunjungan ini. Baginda mengambil peluang ini untuk menyebarkan Islam. Antara mereka yang tertarik dengan seruan Baginda ialah sekumpulan orang dari Yathrib (Madinah). Mereka menemui Baginda dan beberapa orang Islam dari Mekah di desa bernama Aqabah secara sembunyi-sembunyi. Setelah menganut Islam, mereka bersumpah untuk melindungi Islam, Nabi Muhammad SAW dan orang-orang Islam Mekkah. Tahun berikutnya, sekumpulan masyarakat Islam dari Yathrib datang lagi ke Makkah. Mereka menemui Nabi Muhammad di tempat yang mereka bertemu sebelumnya. Kali ini, Abbas bin Abdul Muthalib, pakcik Baginda yang belum menganut Islam hadir dalam pertemuan itu. Mereka mengundang Baginda dan orang-orang Islam Mekkah untuk berhijrah ke Yathrib. Mereka berjanji akan melayani mereka sebagai saudara seAgama. Dialog yang memakan masa agak lama diadakan antara mayarakat Islam Yathrib dengan pakcik Nabi Muhammad SAW untuk memastikan mereka sesungguhnya berhasrat mengalu-alukan masyarakat Islam Mekkah di bandar mereka. Nabi Muhammad SAW akhirnya bersetuju untuk berhijrah beramai-ramai ke bandar baru itu. HIJRAH KE MADINAH (YATHRIB) : Mengetahui ramai masyarakat Islam merancang meninggalkan Makkah, masyarakat jahiliyah Mekkah cuba menghalang mereka. Namun kumpulan pertama telahpun berjaya berhijrah ke Yathrib. Masyarakat jahiliyah Mekkah bimbang hijrah ke Yathrib akan memberi peluang kepada orang Islam untuk mengembangkan Agama mereka ke daerah-daerah yang lain. Hampir dua bulan seluruh masyarakat Islam dari Makkah kecuali Nabi Muhammad SAW, Abu Bakar, Ali dan beberapa orang yang daif, telah berhijrah. RANCANGAN MEMBUNUH RASULULLAH SAW : Masyarakat Mekkah kemudian memutuskan untuk membunuh Baginda. Mereka merancang namun tidak berjaya. Dengan berbagai taktik dan rancangan yang teratur, Nabi Muhammad SAW akhirnya sampai dengan selamat ke Yathrib, yang kemudian dikenali sebagai, 'Bandar Rasulullah SAW'. MADINAH : Di Madinah, kerajaan Islam diwujudkan di bawah pimpinan Baginda umat Islam bebas mengerjakan solat di Madinah. Musyrikin Makkah mengetahui akan perkara ini kemudiannya melancarkan beberapa serangan ke atas Madinah tetapi kesemuanya ditangkis dengan mudah oleh umat Islam. Satu perjanjian kemudiannya dibuat dengan memihak kepada pihak Quraish Makkah. Walau bagaimanapun perjanjian itu dicabuli oleh mereka dengan menyerang sekutu umat Islam. Orang Muslim pada ketika ini menjadi semakin kuat telah membuat keputusan untuk menyerang musyrikin Makkah memandangkan perjanjian telah dicabuli. PEMBUKAAN KOTA MAKKAH : Pada tahun kelapan selepas penghijrahan ke Madinah berlaku, Nabi Muhammad SAW berlepas ke Makkah. Tentera Islam yang seramai 10,000 orang tiba di Makkah dengan penuh bersemangat. Takut akan nyawa mereka terkorban, penduduk Makkah bersetuju untuk menyerahkan kota Makkah tanpa sebarang syarat. Nabi Muhammad SAW kemudian mengarahkan supaya kesemua berhala dan patung-patung di sekeliling Kaabah dimusnahkan. MENELADANI PERBUATAN NABI MUHAMMAD SAW : Perbuatan-perbuatan yang dilakukan Nabi Muhammad SAW dibagi menjadi dua cara. Ada yang termasuk perbuatan-perbuatan jibiliyah, iaitu perbuatan yang dilakukan manusia secara Fitriah, dan ada pula perbuatan-perbuatan selain jibiliyah. Perbuatan-perbuatan jibiliyah, seperti berdiri, duduk, makan, minum dan lain sebagainya, tidak ada perselisihan bahawa status perbuatan tersebut adalah mubah (harus), baik bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW maupun bagi umatnya. Oleh kerana itu, perbuatan tersebut tidak termasuk dalam kategori mandub (sunat). Sedangkan perbuatan-perbuatan yang bukan jibiliyah, boleh jadi termasuk dalam hal-hal yang ditetapkan khusus bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW, dimana tidak seorang pun diperkenankan mengikutinya (haram); atau boleh jadi tidak termasuk dalam perbuatan yang diperuntukkan khusus bagi Baginda. KHUSUS BAGI RASULULLAH SAW : Apabila perbuatan itu telah ditetapkan khusus bagi Nabi Muhammad SAW, seperti dibolehkan Baginda melanjutkan puasa pada malam hari tanpa berbuka, atau dibolehkannya menikah dengan lebih dari empat wanita, dan lain sebagainya dari kekhususan Baginda; maka dalam hal ini kita tidak diperkenankan mengikuti Baginda. Sebab, perbuatan-perbuatan tersebut telah terbukti diperuntukkan khusus bagi Baginda berdasarkan Ijmak Sahabat. Oleh kerana itu tidak dibolehkan meneladani Baginda dalam perbuatan-perbuatan semacam ini. Akan halnya dengan perbuatan Baginda yang kita kenal sebagai penjelas bagi kita, tidak ada perselisihan bahawa hal itu merupakan dalil. Dalam hal ini penjelasan tersebut boleh berupa perkataan, seperti RASULULLAH SAW BERSABDA : “ Solatlah kalian sebagaimana kalian melihat aku solat ”. RASULULLAH SAW BERSABDA " Laksanakan manasik hajimu berdasarkan manasikku (apa yang telah aku kerjakan) ". Hadis ini menunjukkan bahawa perbuatan Baginda merupakan penjelas, agar kita mengikutinya. Penjelasan Baginda boleh juga berupa qaraain al ahwal, yakni qarinah/perbuatan yang menerangkan bentuk perbuatan, seperti memotong pergelangan pencuri sebagai penjelas, ALLAH SWT BERFIRMAN : " Maka potonglah tangan keduanya ." (SURAH AL-MAIDAH : 38) Status penjelas yang terdapat dalam perbuatan Baginda, baik berupa ucapan maupun perbuatan yang menerangkan bentuk perbuatan, dapat mengikuti hukum apa yang telah dijelaskan, apakah itu wajib, haram, mandub(sunat) atau mubah(harus) sesuai dengan arah penunjukan dalil. Sedangkan perbuatan-perbuatan Baginda yang tidak terdapat di dalamnya perbuatan yang menunjukkan bahawa hal itu merupakan penjelas, bukan penolakan dan bukan pula ketetapan. Maka dalam hal ini perlu diperhatikan apakah di dalamnya terdapat maksud untuk bertaqarrub (mendekatkan diri kepada Allah SWT) atau tidak. Apabila di dalamnya terdapat keinginan untuk bertaqarrub kepada Allah SWT maka perbuatan itu termasuk mandub (sunat), di mana seseorang akan mendapatkan pahala atas perbuatannya itu dan tidak mendapatkan balasan jika meninggalkannya. Misalnya Solat Duha. Sedangkan jika tidak terdapat di dalamnya keinginan untuk bertaqarrub, maka perbuatan tersebut termasuk mubah (harus). PESANAN TERAKHIR MUHAMMAD (ISI KHUTBAH TERAKHIR MUHAMMAD) : Ketika Nabi Muhammad SAW mengerjakan ibadah haji yang terakhir, maka pada 9 Zulhijjah tahun 10 hijarah di Lembah Uranah, Bukit Arafah, Baginda menyampaikan khutbah terakhirnya di hadapan kaum Muslimin, di antara isi dari khutbah terakhir Nabi Muhammad SAW itu ialah: " Wahai manusia, dengarlah baik-baik apa yang hendak ku katakan, Aku tidak mengetahui apakah aku dapat bertemu lagi dengan kamu semua selepas tahun ini. Oleh itu, dengarlah dengan teliti kata-kataku ini dan sampaikanlah ia kepada orang-orang yang tidak dapat hadir disini pada hari ini. 1. "Wahai manusia, sepertimana kamu menganggap bulan ini dan kota ini sebagai suci, anggaplah jiwa dan harta setiap orang Muslim sebagai amanah suci. 2. Kembalikan harta yang diamanahkan kepada kamu kepada pemiliknya yang berhak. 3. Janganlah kamu sakiti sesiapapun agar orang lain tidak menyakiti kamu lagi. 4. Ingatlah bahawa sesungguhya kamu akan menemui Tuhan kamu dan DIA pasti membuat perhitungan di atas segala amalan kamu. 5. Allah SWT telah mengharamkan riba, oleh itu, segala urusan yang melibatkan riba dibatalkan mulai sekarang. 6. "Berwaspadalah terhadap syaitan demi keselamatan agama kamu. syaitan telah berputus asa untuk menyesatkan kamu dalam perkara-perkara besar, maka berjaga-jagalah supaya kamu tidak mengikutinya dalam perkara-perkara kecil. 7. "Wahai manusia sebagaimana kamu mempunyai hak atas isteri kamu, mereka juga mempunyai hak ke atas kamu. Sekiranya mereka menyempurnakan hak mereka ke atas kamu, maka mereka juga berhak diberikan makan dan pakaian, dalam suasana kasih sayang. Layanilah wanita-wanita kamu dengan baik dan berlemah-lembutlah terhadap mereka kerana sesungguhnya mereka adalah teman dan pembantu kamu yang setia. Dan hak kamu atas mereka ialah mereka sama sekali tidak boleh memasukkan orang yang kamu tidak sukai ke dalam rumah kamu dan dilarang melakukan zina. 8. "Wahai manusia, dengarlah bersungguh-sungguh kata-kataku ini, sembahlah Allah SWT, dirikanlah solat lima waktu, berpuasalah di bulan Ramadhan, dan tunaikanlah zakat dari harta kekayaan kamu. Kerjakanlah ibadah haji sekiranya kamu mampu. 9. Ketahuilah bahawa setiap Muslim adalah saudara kepada Muslim yang lain. Kamu semua adalah sama; tidak seorang pun yang lebih mulia dari yang lainnya kecuali dalam Taqwa dan beramal soleh. 10. "Ingatlah, bahawa kamu akan menghadap Allah SWT pada suatu hari untuk dipertanggungjawabkan diatas segala apa yang telah kamu kerjakan. Oleh itu, awasilah agar jangan sekali-kali kamu terkeluar dari landasan kebenaran selepas ketiadaanku. 11. "Wahai manusia, tidak ada lagi Nabi atau Rasul yang akan datang selepasku dan tidak akan lahir Agama baru. Oleh itu wahai manusia. Nilailah dengan betul dan fahamilah kata-kataku yang telah aku sampaikan kepada kamu. Sesungguhnya aku tinggalkan kepada kamu dua perkara, yang sekiranya kamu berpegang teguh dan mengikuti kedua-duanya, nescaya kamu tidak akan tersesat selama-lamanya. Itulah Al-Qur'an dan Sunnahku. 12. "Hendaklah orang-orang yang mendengar ucapanku, menyampaikan pula kepada orang lain. Semoga yang terakhir lebih memahami kata-kataku dari mereka yang terus mendengar dariku. Saksikanlah Ya Allah, bahawasanya telah aku sampaikan risalah-MU kepada hamba-hamba-MU." RINGKASAN PERKEMBANGAN ISLAM : 570M- Nabi Muhammad SAW dilahirkan. 610M- Nabi Muhammad SAW menerima wahyu pertama di Gua Hira'. 615M- Orang Muslim didera oleh puak Quraish. Hijrah pertama ke Habsyah. 616M- Sayidina Hamzah dan Saidina Umar memeluk Islam. Hijrah kedua ke Habsyah. 619M- Khadijah ra (isteri Baginda) dan Abu Talib (bapa saudara Baginda) meninggal dunia. Melawat Taif. Peristiwa Isra dan Mi'raj berlaku. 621M- Baiat Aqabah 1. 622M- Baiat Aqabah 2. Hijrah ke Madinah. Daulah Islamiyah dibina. 624M- Perang Badar. 625M- Perang Uhud. 627M- Perang Ahzab. 628M- Perjanjian Hudaibiyah. 629M- Perang Khaibar dan dalam menentang tentera Rom Byzantine, Baginda menghantar tentera Islam dalam Perang Mu'tah. 630M- Pembukaan Makkah. Perang Hunain. 631M- Perang Tabuk. 632M- Kewafatan RASULULLAH SAW, perlantikan Syaidina Abu Bakar sebagai khalifah. KEWAFATAN SAHABAT RASULULLAH SAW : 1. Ali bin Abi Thalib lahir di Makkah Wafat 40 H 2. Hasan bin Ali lahir di Madinah Wafat 50 H 3. Husain bin Ali lahir di Madinah Wafat 61 H 4. Ali bin Husain lahir di Madinah Wafat 95 H 5. Muhammad al-Baqir lahir di Madinah Wafat 114 6. Ja’far ash-Shadiq lahir di Madinah Wafat 148 7. Musa al-Kadzim lahir di Madinah Wafat 183 H 8. Ali ar-Ridha lahir di Madinah Wafat 203 H 9. Muhammad al-Jawad lahir di Madinah Wafat 220 H 10. Ali al-Hadi lahir di Madinah Wafat 254 H 11. Hasan al-Asykari lahir di Madinah Wafat 260 H 12. Muhammad bin al-Asykari Samarra, Irak Lahir 255 H atau 868 M
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 10522 Views
  • Hello SoMee!!!
    I can smell that nothing is going good here sadly :(
    I was checking the status of users and noticed many less posts 😕
    Don't know why it happened but I guess we all can help the system by sharing our Ideas that how we can make good impact 😉
    Photo courtesy: Farman(My friend) who was noticing everything with good focus lol
    Hello SoMee!!! I can smell that nothing is going good here sadly :( I was checking the status of users and noticed many less posts 😕 Don't know why it happened but I guess we all can help the system by sharing our Ideas that how we can make good impact 😉 Photo courtesy: Farman(My friend) who was noticing everything with good focus lol
    Like
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 3128 Views
  • Virology - The Damning Evidence
    The Stake In The Heart For This Pseudoscientific Profession

    dpl
    Introduction

    One never realize how big the task of writing on a subject is until you start. One thing you can be assured of is how much you learn by writing about your findings or thoughts. My stance on virology has been clarified in two previous posts as follows:

    The Gatekeepers Club.

    Virus Lie - The Result of 4 Years of Study.

    Another thing you quickly realize on this journey is how easy it is to censor someone, especially if you start hitting a nerve. I have documented some of it underneath the conclusion of the The Gatekeepers Club article. It is very important to make copies of your work, as shadow banning is one thing, but if these platforms decide to terminate your channel and all the work you have done is on it, you will obviously lose it all. We were in that same position about a year ago when Discord decided to terminate our channel. Twenty of the smartest people you would ever know had been working on it for close to two years, and it was gone overnight. Therefore, this post will serve as safekeeping for some of the best information that I have come across in the last few weeks proving that virology is pseudoscience.


    Update - 18 September 2023

    The order of the sections of this article has been rearranged to introduce the most important information first. As mentioned in my most recent article titled: Hacking at the Root of the Virus Issue it was explained that for the longest time I thought that failure to “isolate” viruses was the most important evidence to focus on. This is however not the case as explained in detail in the “Hacking at the Root of the Virus Issue” article.

    Transmission is the fundamental assumption on which virology rest. Without proof of transmission, nothing downstream matters. Even though understanding these downstream concepts will never be a waste of time one must consider that the normal man on the street will not be interested in complicated terminology and processes.

    It is of crucial importance for the no virus community to find easier ways to explain the fallacy that is virology. Seeing as no one need a laboratory to assess whether transmission is possible and because we can observe this phenomena ourselves (Inductive reasoning) this is the linchpin for virology. A twitter space where we discussed this can be viewed here (*Note: Jamie was cut off during his talk and his section was not included).

    As discussed during the twitter space, we have reviewed the available transmission studies and a summary of these studies can be seen below.

    Transmission / Infection

    One of the funniest things you will see while debating the trolls on Twitter is that they will provide studies conducted to prove the efficacy of vaccines. The people that undertake these studies assume that transmission or infection has already been proven, but nothing could be further from the truth. That is why it is important for us to list the peer-reviewed studies that disprove transmission or infection to further demonstrate that virology is a pseudoscience. The list of studies was compiled with the help of Jamie, georgie&donny, and Aldhissla (also see Aldhissla’s list on polio here).

    (*Please note that this section is open to comments at the moment and anyone that want to add notes or studies are free to leave a comment).

    The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Mar. 1, 1905):
    - Chapman, 1801: Tried to transmit measles using the blood, tears, the mucus of the nostrils and bronchia, and the eruptive matter in the cuticle without any success.
    - Willan, 1809: Inoculated three children with vesicle fluids of measles but without success.
    - Albers, 1834: Attempted to infect four children with measles without success. He quoted Alexander Monro, Bourgois, and Spray as also having made unsuccessful inoculations with saliva, tears, and cutaneous scales.
    - Themmen, 1817: Tried to infect 5 children with measles. 0/5 children became sick.

    Charles Creighton, 1837 (A history of epidemics in Britain). "No proof of the existence of any contagious principles by which it was propagated from one individual to another."

    EH Ackernecht, writing about Anticontagionism between 1821 and 1867 - “That the anticontagionists were usually honest men and in deadly earnest is shown, among other things, by the numerous self-experiments to which they submitted themselves to prove their contentions.” also see “Famous are the plague self-experiments of Clot-Bey, the offers for plague self-experiment by Chervin, Lassis, Costa, Lapis, and Lasserre, and the cholera self-experiments of Fay, Scipio Pinel, Wayrot, and J.L. Guyon. The amazing thing is that almost all of these experiments failed to produce the disease.”

    Note on Hospitals by Florence Nightingale, 1858 - "Suffice it to say, that in the ordinary sense of the word, there is no proof, such as would be admitted in any scientific inquiry, that there is any such thing as 'contagion." also see "Just as there is no such thing as 'contagion,' there is no such thing as inevitable 'infection."

    Andreas Christian Bull, 1868 - “It does not seem apparent in this small [polio] epidemic that contagion played any role, because the disease occurred here and there in the different places of the district without the possibility of establishing any relation between the various cases or the families of the same.”

    Karl-Oskar Medin, 1887 - A Swedish pediatrician who was the first to examine a polio outbreak, concluded that it was an infectious, but not contagious, disease.

    Charles Caverly, 1894 - Investigated the first US polio epidemic: ”it is very certain that it was non-contagious.”

    Journal of American Medical Association, Volume 72, Number 3, 1919 (or additional link here):

    - Warschawsky, 1895 - Injected small pigs and rabbits with blood taken in the eruptive stage. All results were negative.
    - Belila, 1896 - Placed warm nasal mucus and saliva from measles patients on the nasal and oral mucous membrane of rabbits, guinea-pigs, cats, mice, dogs and lambs, but without any positive results.
    - Josias, 1898 - Rubbed measles secretions over the throat, nose and eyes of several young pigs, but without any effects.
    - Geissler, 1903 - Inoculated sheep, swine, goats, dogs and cats in various ways with the bodily fluids from patients with measles; including smearing, spraying, rubbing. All results were negative.
    - Pomjalowsky, 1914 - Injected measles blood into guineapigs, rabbits and small pigs. All results were negative.
    - Jurgelunas, 1914 - Inoculated blood from patients with measles into suckling pigs and rabbits, but without effect.

    Leegaard, 1899 - Was not able to prove a single case of patient-to-patient contagion in a polio outbreak in Norway. "Infantile paralysis is of an infectious, but not of a contagious nature. As a matter of fact no indisputable instance of contagion could be proved."

    Dr. Rodermund, 1901 - From his diary of SmallPox experiments. For 15 years he smeared the pus of smallpox patients on his face and used to go home with his family, play cards at the gentleman’s club and treat other patients and never got sick or saw a single other person get sick.

    Walter Reed, 1902 - “Without entering into details, I may say that, in the first place, the Commission saw, with some surprise, what had so often been noted in the literature, that patients in all stages of yellow fever could be cared for by non-immune nurses without danger of contracting the disease. The non-contagious character of yellow fever was, therefore, hardly to be questioned.”

    Landsteiner & Popper, 1909 - "Attempts to transmit the disease [polio] to the usual laboratory animals, such as rabbits, guinea pigs, or mice, failed."

    F.E. Batten, (1909) - “Against the infectivity of the disease may be urged, first, the absence of spread of infection in hospital. The cases of poliomyelitis admitted to hospital freely mixed with other cases in the ward without any isolation or disinfection, some 70 children came in contact, but no infection took place. (p. 208, last paragraph)”

    The Boston medical and surgical journal, 1909 - An inquiry a 1908 polio outbreak found the following: “A large number of children were in intimate contact with those that were sick, and of these children an insignificant minority developed the disease.” 244 children were in intimate contact with those who were afflicted with polio. Of those 244 children, an "insignificant minority" developed the disease.

    Massachusetts State board of health, 1909 - "Poliomyelitis prevailed in epidemic form in Kansas during the summer of 1909 … No method of contagion could be found, and the author does not consider the disease contagious."

    Flexner & Lewis, 1910 - Multiple unsuccessful polio transmission attempts. "Many guinea-pigs and rabbits, one horse, two calves, three goats, three pigs, three sheep, six rats, six mice, six dogs, and four cats have had active virus introduced in the brain but without causing any appreciable effect whatever. These animals have been under observation for many weeks."

    A Washinton, 1911 - “I have not seen any cases of Polio contagion. We put the patients on one side and typhoid cases on the other, and no nurse or mother was infected. If the disease was so contagious, I don't see why the nurses and mothers would not have been infected.”

    J.J. Moren, 1912 - "Monkeys suffering from polio in the same cage with healthy monkeys, do not infect others."

    P. H. Römer, 1913 - "No proofs of the contagiousness of the disease [polio] could be obtained in the great epidemic in New York in 1907, nor in the epidemic in the Steiermark (Furntratt, Potpeschnigg) nor in Pomerania (Peiper).

    H. W. Frauenthal, 1914 - "Advocates of the contagion theory were at a loss to account for the fact that spontaneous [polio] transmission among laboratory monkeys was never known to occur ... There is no proof that spontaneous transmission of acute poliomyelitis, without an inoculation wound, can take place. There is no proof that contact contagion takes place. Spontaneous development of the disease among laboratory animals is unknown."

    W.H. Frost, 1916 - "The disease [polio] develops in a such a small proportion of people known to have been intimately associated with acute cases of polio." ... "The majority of cases of poliomyelitis can not be traced to known contact, either direct or indirect, with any previous case."

    W. L. Holt, 1916 - Investigated an epidemic of polio and found that he was "surprised that I could trace hardly any cases to personal contact with others, there rarely being successive cases."

    Dr. I. D. Rawlings, 1916 - "Any one who has had much experience with poliomyelitis is struck by the infrequency, relatively, of the secondary cases among direct contacts ... there were approximately 1,500 direct contacts, and yet but one possible case occurred among them. Also among the large number of people that came from New York and other infected areas not a single case occurred.”

    H. L. Abramson, 1917 - Attempts to induce polio in a monkey by injecting the spinal fluid of 40 polio patients (rather than the ground cord) into the brain failed.

    Dold et al. 1917 (Original paper in German from Muenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 64 ( 1917), bottom of p 143) - Injected healthy people with the nasal secretions taken from one ill person, 1/40 healthy people became ill.

    A review of the investigations concerning the etiology of measels, A. W. Sellards
    harvard Medical School. Boston, Massachusetts as seen below:
    - Jurgelunas, 1914: Tried to produce measles in monkeys using inoculations of the blood and mucus secretions from measles patients as well as by exposing the animals to patients in measles wards. All results were negative.
    - Sellards, 1918: Tried to transmit measles to 8 healthy volunteers without a prior history of measles exposure. 0/8 men became sick after multiple failed attempts.
    - Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Inoculated 3 monkeys in various ways, including intensive injections of blood from measles patients. The animals remained well.
    - Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Blood from measles patients was injected simultaneously into 2 men and 2 monkeys. Both men remained symptom-free. One of the two monkeys developed symptoms that were not suggestive of measles.

    Milton Rosenau, 1918 - Professor of preventive medicine and hygiene at Harvard, notes that "monkeys have so far never been known to contract the disease [polio] spontaneously, even though they are kept in intimate association with infected monkeys." Page 341.

    Hess & Unger, 1918 - "In three instances the nasal secretion of varicella patients was applied to the nostrils; in three others the tonsillar secretion to the tonsils, and in six, the tonsillar and pharyngeal secretions were transferred to the nose, the pharynx, and the tonsils. In none of these twelve cases was there any reaction whatsoever, either local or systemic."

    Hess & Unger, 1918 - The vesicle fluids from people with chickenpox was injected intravenously into 38 children. 0/38 became sick.

    Published in the Journal - American Medical Association, 1919 - Need Of Further Research On The Transmissibility Of Measles And Varicella. “Evidently in our experiments we do not, as we believe, pursue nature's mode of transmission; either we fail to carry over the virus, or the path of infection is quite different from what it is commonly thought to be.”

    Milton J. Rosenau, March 1919 - Conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people.

    More information on the Rosenau studies here.

    Wahl et al, 1919 - Conducted 3 separate trials on six men attempting to infect them with different strains of Influenza. Not a single person got sick.

    Schmidt et al, 1920 (Original paper in German here) - Conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”.

    Williams et al, 1921 - Tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill.

    Mahatma Gandhi, 1921 - "and the poison that accumulates in the system is expelled in the form of small-pox. If this view is correct, then there is absolutely no need to be afraid of small-pox" also see "This has given rise to the superstition that it is a contagious disease, and hence to the attempt to mislead the people into the belief that vaccination is an effective means of preventing it."

    Blanc and Caminopetros, 1922 (original paper in French here) - Material from nine cases of shingles was inoculated into the eyes, cornea, conjunctiva, skin, brain, and spinal cord of a series of animals, including rabbits, mice, sheep, pigeons, monkeys, and a dog. All results were negative.

    Robertson & Groves, 1924 - Exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0 people of 100 whom they deliberately tried to infect with Influenza got sick That is because Viruses don't cause disease.

    Bauguess, 1924 - "A careful search of the literature does not reveal a case in which the blood from a patient having measles was injected into the blood stream of another person and produced measles."

    The problem of the etiology of herpes zoster, 1925 - "Many other authors report entirely negative results following the inoculation of herpes zoster material into the sacrified corneas of rabbits: Kraupa (18); Baum (19); LSwenstein (8), Teissier, Gastinel, and Reilly (20) ; Kooy (21) ; Netter and Urbain (22); Bloch and Terris (23); Simon and Scott (24); and Doerr (25). It is evident, therefore, that the results of attempts to inoculate animals with material from cases of herpes zoster must be considered at present to be inconclusive."

    Volney S and Chney M.D., 1928 - A study where it is clearly stated that cold is not infectious.

    Dochez et al, 1930 - Attempted to infect 11 men with intranasal influenza. Not a single person got sick. Most strikingly one person got very sick when he accidently found out that is what they were trying to do. His symptoms disappeared when they told him he was misinformed.

    L. L. Lumsden, 1935 - “Painstaking efforts were made throughout the studies to obtain all traces of transmission of the disease through personal contact, but it appears that in this outbreak in Louisville evidence of personal association between the cases of poliomyelitis, suggestive of cause and effect, was no more common than that which might have been found if histories had been taken of personal association between cases of broken bones occurring in the city in the same period.”

    Thomas Francis Jr et al, 1936 - Gave 23 people influenza via 3 different methods. 0 people got sick.. They gave 2 people already "suffering from colds" the influenza who also did not get sick

    Burnet and Lush, 1937 - 200 people given "Melbourne type" Influenza . 0 people showed any symptoms of disease. 200/0.

    Lumsden, 1938 - "It is quite usual in small [polio] outbreaks in rural counties for individual cases to develop in separate homes three or for miles apart without there being any evidence of direct or indirect personal contact having operated between persons afflicted."

    L. L Lumsden, 1938 - ”The general and usual epidemiological features of the disease [polio] all appear opposed to the hypothesis that poliomyelitis is a contagious disease spread among human beings by nose-to-nose or any other direct personal contact.”

    Burnet and Foley, 1940 - Attempted to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure.

    Thomas Francis Jr, 1940 - Gave 11 people "Epidemic Influenza" 0 people got sick. That is because viruses don't cause disease.

    John Toomey, 1941 - A veteran polio researcher: "no animal gets the disease from another, no matter how intimately exposed."

    A. R. Kendall, 1945 - “The epidemiological facts of poliomyelitis are these: … (2) A majority of cases of clinically diagnosable poliomyelitis (polioparalysis) occur sporadically, with no history of contact with previous cases. (3) Two cases of polioparalysis in one family are unusual, even though no precautions are taken to prevent cross infection. (4) Clinically diagnosable cases of poliomyelitis (polioparalysis) show little tendency to spread, even in schools or other places of public gathering. (5) Incidence of polioparalysis is no greater among doctors and nurses, in intimate contact with acute cases than it is among the civil population, even though the former are exposed freely to infection.” […] “Polioparalysis is not contagious.”

    E. B. Shaw & H. E. Thelander, 1949 - “The epidemiology of the disease [polio] remains obscure. There has been a tendency to depart from an early theory that the disease spreads by means of direct contact.”

    Albert Sabin, 1951 (inventor of the polio vaccine). "There is no evidence for the transmission of poliomyelitis by droplet nuclei."

    Archibald L. Hoyne, 1951 (alternative link here) - “However, in the Cook County Contagious Disease Hospital where the latter procedure has not been used there has never been a doctor, intern, nurse or any other member of the personnel who contracted poliomyelitis within a period of at least thirty-five years, nor has any patient ever developed poliomyelitis after admission to the hospital.”

    Ralph R. Scobey, 1951 - ”Although poliomyelitis is legally a contagious disease, which implies that it is caused by a germ or virus, every attempt has failed conclusively to prove this mandatory requirement of the public health law.” Professor of clinical pediatrics and president of the Poliomyelitis Research Institute, Syracuse, N.Y.

    Ralph R. Scobey, 1952 - "In addition to the failure to prove contagiousness of human poliomyelitis, it has likewise been impossible to prove contagiousness of poliomyelitis in experimental animals."

    Douglas Gordon et al, 1975 - This study gave 10 people English type Influenza and 10 people a placebo. The study was negative. Most telling is they admit that mild symptoms were seen in the placebo group, proving that the inoculation methods cause them.

    Beare et al 1980 (refer to reference 6 in the linked paper). Quote from John J Cannell, 2008 as follows - “An eighth conundrum – one not addressed by Hope-Simpson – is the surprising percentage of seronegative volunteers who either escape infection or develop only minor illness after being experimentally inoculated with a novel influenza virus.”

    Nancy Padian, 1996 - A study which followed 176 discordant couples (1 HIV positive and the other negative) for 10 years. These couples regularly slept together and had unprotected sex. There were no HIV transmissions from the positive partner to the negative partner during the entirety of the study.

    John Treanor et al, 1999 - Gave 108 people Influenza A. Only 35% recorded mild symptoms such as stuffy nose. Unfortunately 35% of the placebo control group also developed mild symptoms proving the methods of inoculation are causing them.

    Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza... Thus, most information on human-to-human transmission of influenza comes from studies of human inoculation with influenza virus and observational studies."

    The Virology Journal, 2008 - ”There were five attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the pandemic [1918 flu] and all were ’singularly fruitless’ … all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.”

    Public Health Reports, 2010 - ”It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions.”

    Jasmin S Kutter, 2018, - Our observations underscore the urgent need for new knowledge on respiratory virus transmission routes and the implementation of this knowledge in infection control guidelines to advance intervention strategies for currently circulating and newly emerging viruses and to improve public health.
    - There is a substantial lack of (experimental) evidence on the transmission routes of PIV (types 1–4) and HMPV.
    - Extensive human rhinovirus transmission experiments have not led to a widely accepted view on the transmission route [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40].
    - However, until today, results on the relative importance of droplet and aerosol transmission of influenza viruses stay inconclusive and hence, there are many reviews intensively discussing this issue [10, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50].
    - Despite this, the relative importance of transmission routes of respiratory viruses is still unclear, depending on the heterogeneity of many factors like the environment (e.g. temperature and humidity), pathogen and host [5, 19].

    Jonathan Van Tam, 2020 - Conducted these human trials of Flu A in 2013. 52 people were intentionally given "Flu A" and made to live in controlled conditions with 75 people. 0 people sick. 0 PCR positive.

    J.S. Kutter, 2021 - “Besides nasal discharge, no other signs of illness were observed in the A/H1N1 virus-positive donor and indirect recipient animals.” The animals were subsequently euthanized after the animals experienced what the scientist describe as having breathing difficulties (no further details were given to describe their condition). *Refer to Note 1.

    Ben Killingley, 2022 - Gave 36 people what he considered to be purified Covid Virus Intranasally. The Results: Nobody got sick. *Refer to Note 2.

    Notes

    *Note 1 - Jasmin Kutter, 2021:

    From the Results section: “Throat and nasal swabs were collected from the donor and indirect recipient animals on alternating days.” This on its own can lead to nasal discharge which is the only “sign of illness” that was noted in this study.

    *Note 2 - Ben Killingley, 2022:

    See the video explanation by Jamie here.

    Ben Killingley also conducted a study in the early 2010's in which he had inoculated people in a room with 75 others some wearing masks others as a control. Not a single person even tested PCR positive. Some links to his previous studies include a 2011, 2019 and a 2020 study.

    It is assumed that his latest, 2022 study, is a follow up to cover the findings of his previous findings. Some additional notes on the study referenced include:

    - They gave 10 people the potent nephrotoxin Remdisivir.

    - They measure sickness by means of a PCR test which isn't indicative of disease because it can tests positive with “asymptomatic” cases as well.

    - Even if you say that a runny nose after swabbing is Covid. A 50% outcome to a direct challenge of something is a negative result. It doesn't suggest causation which would need to be at least 90%.

    - The very methods of inoculation used during the study could cause the nasal congestion/discharge (which is their measure of whether someone is sick or not). This has been shown in previous studies.

    - Lastly nobody was given "regeneron" because nobody got "sick".

    *Note 3 - Dr Robert Willner, 1994:

    December 7th 1994 Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Greensboro, N.C., Dr Willner (a medical doctor of 40 years experience) an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax. In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself. In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain’s most popular television show envoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the “AIDS hypothesis.” When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: “I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind.” He tested negative multiple times. He died of a Heart attack 4 months later 15th April 1995 (yeh right, funny how these naysayers all die suddenly. Link to the presentation here.

    Ludicrous “Transmission” Studies

    The picture of virology’s ludicrousy won’t be complete without a list of studies showing the insanity of what virologists claim to be transmission of disease. This include the injection of fluids into the brains and lungs of animals and we may just include some epidemiological studies to show how these are also not proof of anything. Joe Hendry mostly put it together and the papers we have are as follows (*Please note that this section is open to comments at the moment and anyone that want to add notes or studies are free to leave a comment):

    Louis Pasteur, 1881 - For rabies, tried to demonstrate transmission by injecting diseased brain tissue "directly onto the surface of the brain of a healthy dog through a hole drilled into its skull."

    Simon Flexner and Paul A. Lewis, 1910 - Spinal cords from deceased children were ground up and emulsified to be injected into the brains of monkeys. Study explained in detail here.

    John F. Anderson and Joseph Goldberger, 1911 - Injected blood from a measles patient directly into the heart and brains of monkeys.

    Carl Tenbroeck, 1918 - A mixture of ground up rat's livers, spleens, kidneys,
    testicles, lungs, hearts, and brains was injected into the brains of other rats.

    Claus W. Jungeblut, 1931 - Ground up monkey spinal cord was injected into the brains of other monkeys.

    Wilson Smith, 1933 - “The infected animal is killed when showing symptoms, often at the beginning of the second temperature rise. The turbinates are scraped out, ground up with sand, and emulsified in about 20 c.cm. of equal parts of broth and saline. The emulsion is lightly centrifuged, and about 1 c.cm. of the supernatant fluid is dropped into the nostrils of another ferret.”

    Thomas Francis and Jr, T. P. Magill, 1935 - Ground up ferret lung tissue was injected into the brains of rabbits.

    Ann G. Kuttner and T'sun T'ung, 1935 - Ground up kidney and brain of a guinea pig was injected into the brain of another guinea pig.

    Erich Traub. April 01 1936 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of guinea pigs.

    Albert B. Sabin and Peter K. Olitsky, 1937 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of other mice.

    G. John Buddingh, 1938 - Ground up chick embryo was injected into the brains 2 or 3 day old chicks.

    Gilbert Dalldorf, 1939 - Ground up ferret spleens was injected into the brains of mice.

    Claus W. Jungeblut et al, 1942 - Ground up brain or spinal cord of paralyzed mice was injected into the brains of 13 monkeys.

    Henry Pinkerton and Vicente Moragues, 1942 - Ground up brain tissue from dying mice was injected into the brains of pigeons.

    C. Kling et al, 1942 - Injected sewage sludge into the brains and abdomen of monkeys. This convinced him that he had isolated a virus and proven that the sewer is a vehicle for polio transmission.

    D.M. Horstmann, 1944 - Allegedly "proved" that the feces of polio patients contained "poliovirus" by injecting fecal samples into monkeys' brains and spines.

    Joseph E. Smadel et al, 1945 - Ground up pigeon spleen was injected into the brains of mice.

    F. Sargent Cheever et al, 1949 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of rats and hamsters.

    Isolation

    Isolation has been well defined in Virus Lie - The Result of 4 Years of Study and to this day there has not been a single paper presented that could show the isolation of a virus without first contaminating the sample. This is shown in detail in the virus lie article and will not be repeated here again. One interesting point that can be captured here is all the studies showing a control test proving that the isolation method used for viruses is flawed. They can be listed as follows:

    John F Enders, 1954 - Under other agents isolated during the study. "A second agent was obtained from an uninoculated culture of monkey kidney cells. The cytopathic changes it induced in the unstained preparations could not be distinguished with confidence from the viruses isolated from measles." It is highlighted here. Refer to the video explanation here.

    Image
    It is further discussed in the paper that "While there is no ground for concluding that the factors in vivo (in the body) are the same as those which underlie the formation of giant cells and the nuclear disturbances in vitro (outside a living organism), the appearance of these phenomena in cultured cells is consistent with the properties that a priori might be associated with the virus of measles.”

    Image
    Rustigian et al, 1955 - This paper is described in an article by Viroliegy here (look under Rustigain in the article).

    Cohen et al, 1955 - This paper is also described in the same article by Viroliegy here (look under Cohen in the article).

    Bech and von Magnus, 1959 - This paper is also described in the same article by Viroliegy here (look under Von Magnus in the article).

    F Rapp et al, 1959 - This paper is described in a video by Spacebusters here. Most noteworthy is “Monkey kidney cells, however, are unsuitable for the investigations of the type reported here; Peebles et al. and Ruckle showed that monkeys, and cell cultures derived from them, are often infected with an agent serologically indistinguishable from human measles virus, which causes cytopathic changes in monkey kidney cell cultures almost identical with those caused by human measles virus.”

    Image
    Carl J. O’Hara et al, 1988 - The study demonstrated "HIV" particles in 18 out of 20 (90% of) AIDS-related lymph node enlargements but also in 13 out of 15 (88% of) non-AIDS-related enlargements. Which means that particles claimed to be HIV virions are non-specific since identical particles can be found in the majority of patients with enlarged lymph nodes not attributed to AIDS, and at no risk for developing AIDS. Refer to @Aldhissla45’s tweet here.

    P Gluschankof et al, 1997 - This paper described in a video here with additional notes by Jamie here.

    Julian W. Bess Jr., 1997 - This paper described in a video here with additional notes by Jamie here.

    C.A. Cassol, 2020 - This paper is described by Andrew Kaufman here as well as by Thomas Cowan here.

    “Unofficially” we can also add the Lanka 3 phase control experiment that can be seen here or searched for it here.

    A further indication of the isolation procedure fallacy is shown in a study during which the CPE becomes more well defined with the addition of specific substances. The study is as follows:

    Leon Caly et al, 2020 - “Following several failures to recover virions with the characteristic fringes of surface spike proteins, it was found that adding trypsin to the cell culture medium immediately improved virion morphology.” See a video explanation here.

    Recent Requests and Statements

    Further and more recent requests and statements that were sent to me by my good friend Courtenay are as follows:

    May 5, 2022:
    U.S. CDC and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry confirmed that a search of their records failed to find any that describe anyone on Earth finding an alleged “avian influenza virus” in the bodily fluids of any diseased diseased host (animal or human) and purifying “it”… which is necessary so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments. This can be viewed here.

    May 20, 2022:
    Public Health Agency of Canada confirmed that they have no record of any alleged “avian influenza virus” having been found and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of any diseased “host” on the planet (in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments) by anyone, anywhere, ever.
    Insanely, they insist that:

    “Viruses” are in hosts despite their utter inability to find them there,.

    It’s necessary to “grow them” in non-host cells (as if “they” would grow better there than they allegedly grew in the diseased host lol).

    They pretend that mixing complex substances together results in purification.

    This can be viewed here.

    December 20, 2021:
    Public Health Agency of Canada confirmed that they have no record of any alleged “virus” having been purified from a sample taken from any diseased human on Earth, by anyone, ever, period. To be viewed here.

    March 11, 2022:
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry respond to a FOIA request for all studies / reports in their possession, custody or control describing the purification of any “virus” addressed by any “vaccine” on either their childhood or adult U.S. “immunization” schedule, directly from a sample taken from any diseased "host" on Earth where the sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. CDC/ATSDR provided 5 studies on “rotavirus” (thereby admitting they have no records for any other alleged viruses). None of these 5 studies actually describe isolation/purification of a “rotavirus” from a human.
    Request, response, studies to be viewed here.

    March 8, 2023:
    Italy 2020: Inside Covid’s “Ground zero” in Europe - Three years ago the Western World came to a standstill. The official Covid-19 narrative depicted a strange suddenly-super-spreading, deadlier-than-flu virus hailing from China that landed in Northern Italy.

    On February 20, 2020 the first alleged case of Covid-19 was discovered in the West in the Lombardy town of Codogno, Italy. Later that day the Italian government reported their first “Covid-19 death.”

    Dramatic media reports emerging from Northern Italy were hammered into and onto the Western psyche giving the impression there was a mysterious “super spreading” and “super lethal” novel virus galloping across the region infecting and killing scores of people.

    Read the rest of the report here.

    Conclusion

    The above list will be worked on over the coming years. If you think that any corrections need to be made or if you want to add additional studies, please leave a comment.


    Share

    Leave a comment

    https://open.substack.com/pub/dpl003/p/virology-the-damning-evidence?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    Virology - The Damning Evidence The Stake In The Heart For This Pseudoscientific Profession dpl Introduction One never realize how big the task of writing on a subject is until you start. One thing you can be assured of is how much you learn by writing about your findings or thoughts. My stance on virology has been clarified in two previous posts as follows: The Gatekeepers Club. Virus Lie - The Result of 4 Years of Study. Another thing you quickly realize on this journey is how easy it is to censor someone, especially if you start hitting a nerve. I have documented some of it underneath the conclusion of the The Gatekeepers Club article. It is very important to make copies of your work, as shadow banning is one thing, but if these platforms decide to terminate your channel and all the work you have done is on it, you will obviously lose it all. We were in that same position about a year ago when Discord decided to terminate our channel. Twenty of the smartest people you would ever know had been working on it for close to two years, and it was gone overnight. Therefore, this post will serve as safekeeping for some of the best information that I have come across in the last few weeks proving that virology is pseudoscience. Update - 18 September 2023 The order of the sections of this article has been rearranged to introduce the most important information first. As mentioned in my most recent article titled: Hacking at the Root of the Virus Issue it was explained that for the longest time I thought that failure to “isolate” viruses was the most important evidence to focus on. This is however not the case as explained in detail in the “Hacking at the Root of the Virus Issue” article. Transmission is the fundamental assumption on which virology rest. Without proof of transmission, nothing downstream matters. Even though understanding these downstream concepts will never be a waste of time one must consider that the normal man on the street will not be interested in complicated terminology and processes. It is of crucial importance for the no virus community to find easier ways to explain the fallacy that is virology. Seeing as no one need a laboratory to assess whether transmission is possible and because we can observe this phenomena ourselves (Inductive reasoning) this is the linchpin for virology. A twitter space where we discussed this can be viewed here (*Note: Jamie was cut off during his talk and his section was not included). As discussed during the twitter space, we have reviewed the available transmission studies and a summary of these studies can be seen below. Transmission / Infection One of the funniest things you will see while debating the trolls on Twitter is that they will provide studies conducted to prove the efficacy of vaccines. The people that undertake these studies assume that transmission or infection has already been proven, but nothing could be further from the truth. That is why it is important for us to list the peer-reviewed studies that disprove transmission or infection to further demonstrate that virology is a pseudoscience. The list of studies was compiled with the help of Jamie, georgie&donny, and Aldhissla (also see Aldhissla’s list on polio here). (*Please note that this section is open to comments at the moment and anyone that want to add notes or studies are free to leave a comment). The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Mar. 1, 1905): - Chapman, 1801: Tried to transmit measles using the blood, tears, the mucus of the nostrils and bronchia, and the eruptive matter in the cuticle without any success. - Willan, 1809: Inoculated three children with vesicle fluids of measles but without success. - Albers, 1834: Attempted to infect four children with measles without success. He quoted Alexander Monro, Bourgois, and Spray as also having made unsuccessful inoculations with saliva, tears, and cutaneous scales. - Themmen, 1817: Tried to infect 5 children with measles. 0/5 children became sick. Charles Creighton, 1837 (A history of epidemics in Britain). "No proof of the existence of any contagious principles by which it was propagated from one individual to another." EH Ackernecht, writing about Anticontagionism between 1821 and 1867 - “That the anticontagionists were usually honest men and in deadly earnest is shown, among other things, by the numerous self-experiments to which they submitted themselves to prove their contentions.” also see “Famous are the plague self-experiments of Clot-Bey, the offers for plague self-experiment by Chervin, Lassis, Costa, Lapis, and Lasserre, and the cholera self-experiments of Fay, Scipio Pinel, Wayrot, and J.L. Guyon. The amazing thing is that almost all of these experiments failed to produce the disease.” Note on Hospitals by Florence Nightingale, 1858 - "Suffice it to say, that in the ordinary sense of the word, there is no proof, such as would be admitted in any scientific inquiry, that there is any such thing as 'contagion." also see "Just as there is no such thing as 'contagion,' there is no such thing as inevitable 'infection." Andreas Christian Bull, 1868 - “It does not seem apparent in this small [polio] epidemic that contagion played any role, because the disease occurred here and there in the different places of the district without the possibility of establishing any relation between the various cases or the families of the same.” Karl-Oskar Medin, 1887 - A Swedish pediatrician who was the first to examine a polio outbreak, concluded that it was an infectious, but not contagious, disease. Charles Caverly, 1894 - Investigated the first US polio epidemic: ”it is very certain that it was non-contagious.” Journal of American Medical Association, Volume 72, Number 3, 1919 (or additional link here): - Warschawsky, 1895 - Injected small pigs and rabbits with blood taken in the eruptive stage. All results were negative. - Belila, 1896 - Placed warm nasal mucus and saliva from measles patients on the nasal and oral mucous membrane of rabbits, guinea-pigs, cats, mice, dogs and lambs, but without any positive results. - Josias, 1898 - Rubbed measles secretions over the throat, nose and eyes of several young pigs, but without any effects. - Geissler, 1903 - Inoculated sheep, swine, goats, dogs and cats in various ways with the bodily fluids from patients with measles; including smearing, spraying, rubbing. All results were negative. - Pomjalowsky, 1914 - Injected measles blood into guineapigs, rabbits and small pigs. All results were negative. - Jurgelunas, 1914 - Inoculated blood from patients with measles into suckling pigs and rabbits, but without effect. Leegaard, 1899 - Was not able to prove a single case of patient-to-patient contagion in a polio outbreak in Norway. "Infantile paralysis is of an infectious, but not of a contagious nature. As a matter of fact no indisputable instance of contagion could be proved." Dr. Rodermund, 1901 - From his diary of SmallPox experiments. For 15 years he smeared the pus of smallpox patients on his face and used to go home with his family, play cards at the gentleman’s club and treat other patients and never got sick or saw a single other person get sick. Walter Reed, 1902 - “Without entering into details, I may say that, in the first place, the Commission saw, with some surprise, what had so often been noted in the literature, that patients in all stages of yellow fever could be cared for by non-immune nurses without danger of contracting the disease. The non-contagious character of yellow fever was, therefore, hardly to be questioned.” Landsteiner & Popper, 1909 - "Attempts to transmit the disease [polio] to the usual laboratory animals, such as rabbits, guinea pigs, or mice, failed." F.E. Batten, (1909) - “Against the infectivity of the disease may be urged, first, the absence of spread of infection in hospital. The cases of poliomyelitis admitted to hospital freely mixed with other cases in the ward without any isolation or disinfection, some 70 children came in contact, but no infection took place. (p. 208, last paragraph)” The Boston medical and surgical journal, 1909 - An inquiry a 1908 polio outbreak found the following: “A large number of children were in intimate contact with those that were sick, and of these children an insignificant minority developed the disease.” 244 children were in intimate contact with those who were afflicted with polio. Of those 244 children, an "insignificant minority" developed the disease. Massachusetts State board of health, 1909 - "Poliomyelitis prevailed in epidemic form in Kansas during the summer of 1909 … No method of contagion could be found, and the author does not consider the disease contagious." Flexner & Lewis, 1910 - Multiple unsuccessful polio transmission attempts. "Many guinea-pigs and rabbits, one horse, two calves, three goats, three pigs, three sheep, six rats, six mice, six dogs, and four cats have had active virus introduced in the brain but without causing any appreciable effect whatever. These animals have been under observation for many weeks." A Washinton, 1911 - “I have not seen any cases of Polio contagion. We put the patients on one side and typhoid cases on the other, and no nurse or mother was infected. If the disease was so contagious, I don't see why the nurses and mothers would not have been infected.” J.J. Moren, 1912 - "Monkeys suffering from polio in the same cage with healthy monkeys, do not infect others." P. H. Römer, 1913 - "No proofs of the contagiousness of the disease [polio] could be obtained in the great epidemic in New York in 1907, nor in the epidemic in the Steiermark (Furntratt, Potpeschnigg) nor in Pomerania (Peiper). H. W. Frauenthal, 1914 - "Advocates of the contagion theory were at a loss to account for the fact that spontaneous [polio] transmission among laboratory monkeys was never known to occur ... There is no proof that spontaneous transmission of acute poliomyelitis, without an inoculation wound, can take place. There is no proof that contact contagion takes place. Spontaneous development of the disease among laboratory animals is unknown." W.H. Frost, 1916 - "The disease [polio] develops in a such a small proportion of people known to have been intimately associated with acute cases of polio." ... "The majority of cases of poliomyelitis can not be traced to known contact, either direct or indirect, with any previous case." W. L. Holt, 1916 - Investigated an epidemic of polio and found that he was "surprised that I could trace hardly any cases to personal contact with others, there rarely being successive cases." Dr. I. D. Rawlings, 1916 - "Any one who has had much experience with poliomyelitis is struck by the infrequency, relatively, of the secondary cases among direct contacts ... there were approximately 1,500 direct contacts, and yet but one possible case occurred among them. Also among the large number of people that came from New York and other infected areas not a single case occurred.” H. L. Abramson, 1917 - Attempts to induce polio in a monkey by injecting the spinal fluid of 40 polio patients (rather than the ground cord) into the brain failed. Dold et al. 1917 (Original paper in German from Muenchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 64 ( 1917), bottom of p 143) - Injected healthy people with the nasal secretions taken from one ill person, 1/40 healthy people became ill. A review of the investigations concerning the etiology of measels, A. W. Sellards harvard Medical School. Boston, Massachusetts as seen below: - Jurgelunas, 1914: Tried to produce measles in monkeys using inoculations of the blood and mucus secretions from measles patients as well as by exposing the animals to patients in measles wards. All results were negative. - Sellards, 1918: Tried to transmit measles to 8 healthy volunteers without a prior history of measles exposure. 0/8 men became sick after multiple failed attempts. - Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Inoculated 3 monkeys in various ways, including intensive injections of blood from measles patients. The animals remained well. - Sellards and Wenworth, 1918: Blood from measles patients was injected simultaneously into 2 men and 2 monkeys. Both men remained symptom-free. One of the two monkeys developed symptoms that were not suggestive of measles. Milton Rosenau, 1918 - Professor of preventive medicine and hygiene at Harvard, notes that "monkeys have so far never been known to contract the disease [polio] spontaneously, even though they are kept in intimate association with infected monkeys." Page 341. Hess & Unger, 1918 - "In three instances the nasal secretion of varicella patients was applied to the nostrils; in three others the tonsillar secretion to the tonsils, and in six, the tonsillar and pharyngeal secretions were transferred to the nose, the pharynx, and the tonsils. In none of these twelve cases was there any reaction whatsoever, either local or systemic." Hess & Unger, 1918 - The vesicle fluids from people with chickenpox was injected intravenously into 38 children. 0/38 became sick. Published in the Journal - American Medical Association, 1919 - Need Of Further Research On The Transmissibility Of Measles And Varicella. “Evidently in our experiments we do not, as we believe, pursue nature's mode of transmission; either we fail to carry over the virus, or the path of infection is quite different from what it is commonly thought to be.” Milton J. Rosenau, March 1919 - Conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people. More information on the Rosenau studies here. Wahl et al, 1919 - Conducted 3 separate trials on six men attempting to infect them with different strains of Influenza. Not a single person got sick. Schmidt et al, 1920 (Original paper in German here) - Conducted two controlled experiments, exposing healthy people to the bodily fluids of sick people. Of 196 people exposed to the mucous secretions of sick people, 21 (10.7%) developed colds and three developed grippe (1.5%). In the second group, of the 84 healthy people exposed to mucous secretions of sick people, five developed grippe (5.9%) and four colds (4.7%). Of forty-three controls who had been inoculated with sterile physiological salt solutions eight (18.6%) developed colds. A higher percentage of people got sick after being exposed to saline compared to those being exposed to the “virus”. Williams et al, 1921 - Tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. Mahatma Gandhi, 1921 - "and the poison that accumulates in the system is expelled in the form of small-pox. If this view is correct, then there is absolutely no need to be afraid of small-pox" also see "This has given rise to the superstition that it is a contagious disease, and hence to the attempt to mislead the people into the belief that vaccination is an effective means of preventing it." Blanc and Caminopetros, 1922 (original paper in French here) - Material from nine cases of shingles was inoculated into the eyes, cornea, conjunctiva, skin, brain, and spinal cord of a series of animals, including rabbits, mice, sheep, pigeons, monkeys, and a dog. All results were negative. Robertson & Groves, 1924 - Exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. 0 people of 100 whom they deliberately tried to infect with Influenza got sick That is because Viruses don't cause disease. Bauguess, 1924 - "A careful search of the literature does not reveal a case in which the blood from a patient having measles was injected into the blood stream of another person and produced measles." The problem of the etiology of herpes zoster, 1925 - "Many other authors report entirely negative results following the inoculation of herpes zoster material into the sacrified corneas of rabbits: Kraupa (18); Baum (19); LSwenstein (8), Teissier, Gastinel, and Reilly (20) ; Kooy (21) ; Netter and Urbain (22); Bloch and Terris (23); Simon and Scott (24); and Doerr (25). It is evident, therefore, that the results of attempts to inoculate animals with material from cases of herpes zoster must be considered at present to be inconclusive." Volney S and Chney M.D., 1928 - A study where it is clearly stated that cold is not infectious. Dochez et al, 1930 - Attempted to infect 11 men with intranasal influenza. Not a single person got sick. Most strikingly one person got very sick when he accidently found out that is what they were trying to do. His symptoms disappeared when they told him he was misinformed. L. L. Lumsden, 1935 - “Painstaking efforts were made throughout the studies to obtain all traces of transmission of the disease through personal contact, but it appears that in this outbreak in Louisville evidence of personal association between the cases of poliomyelitis, suggestive of cause and effect, was no more common than that which might have been found if histories had been taken of personal association between cases of broken bones occurring in the city in the same period.” Thomas Francis Jr et al, 1936 - Gave 23 people influenza via 3 different methods. 0 people got sick.. They gave 2 people already "suffering from colds" the influenza who also did not get sick Burnet and Lush, 1937 - 200 people given "Melbourne type" Influenza . 0 people showed any symptoms of disease. 200/0. Lumsden, 1938 - "It is quite usual in small [polio] outbreaks in rural counties for individual cases to develop in separate homes three or for miles apart without there being any evidence of direct or indirect personal contact having operated between persons afflicted." L. L Lumsden, 1938 - ”The general and usual epidemiological features of the disease [polio] all appear opposed to the hypothesis that poliomyelitis is a contagious disease spread among human beings by nose-to-nose or any other direct personal contact.” Burnet and Foley, 1940 - Attempted to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure. Thomas Francis Jr, 1940 - Gave 11 people "Epidemic Influenza" 0 people got sick. That is because viruses don't cause disease. John Toomey, 1941 - A veteran polio researcher: "no animal gets the disease from another, no matter how intimately exposed." A. R. Kendall, 1945 - “The epidemiological facts of poliomyelitis are these: … (2) A majority of cases of clinically diagnosable poliomyelitis (polioparalysis) occur sporadically, with no history of contact with previous cases. (3) Two cases of polioparalysis in one family are unusual, even though no precautions are taken to prevent cross infection. (4) Clinically diagnosable cases of poliomyelitis (polioparalysis) show little tendency to spread, even in schools or other places of public gathering. (5) Incidence of polioparalysis is no greater among doctors and nurses, in intimate contact with acute cases than it is among the civil population, even though the former are exposed freely to infection.” […] “Polioparalysis is not contagious.” E. B. Shaw & H. E. Thelander, 1949 - “The epidemiology of the disease [polio] remains obscure. There has been a tendency to depart from an early theory that the disease spreads by means of direct contact.” Albert Sabin, 1951 (inventor of the polio vaccine). "There is no evidence for the transmission of poliomyelitis by droplet nuclei." Archibald L. Hoyne, 1951 (alternative link here) - “However, in the Cook County Contagious Disease Hospital where the latter procedure has not been used there has never been a doctor, intern, nurse or any other member of the personnel who contracted poliomyelitis within a period of at least thirty-five years, nor has any patient ever developed poliomyelitis after admission to the hospital.” Ralph R. Scobey, 1951 - ”Although poliomyelitis is legally a contagious disease, which implies that it is caused by a germ or virus, every attempt has failed conclusively to prove this mandatory requirement of the public health law.” Professor of clinical pediatrics and president of the Poliomyelitis Research Institute, Syracuse, N.Y. Ralph R. Scobey, 1952 - "In addition to the failure to prove contagiousness of human poliomyelitis, it has likewise been impossible to prove contagiousness of poliomyelitis in experimental animals." Douglas Gordon et al, 1975 - This study gave 10 people English type Influenza and 10 people a placebo. The study was negative. Most telling is they admit that mild symptoms were seen in the placebo group, proving that the inoculation methods cause them. Beare et al 1980 (refer to reference 6 in the linked paper). Quote from John J Cannell, 2008 as follows - “An eighth conundrum – one not addressed by Hope-Simpson – is the surprising percentage of seronegative volunteers who either escape infection or develop only minor illness after being experimentally inoculated with a novel influenza virus.” Nancy Padian, 1996 - A study which followed 176 discordant couples (1 HIV positive and the other negative) for 10 years. These couples regularly slept together and had unprotected sex. There were no HIV transmissions from the positive partner to the negative partner during the entirety of the study. John Treanor et al, 1999 - Gave 108 people Influenza A. Only 35% recorded mild symptoms such as stuffy nose. Unfortunately 35% of the placebo control group also developed mild symptoms proving the methods of inoculation are causing them. Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza... Thus, most information on human-to-human transmission of influenza comes from studies of human inoculation with influenza virus and observational studies." The Virology Journal, 2008 - ”There were five attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the pandemic [1918 flu] and all were ’singularly fruitless’ … all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.” Public Health Reports, 2010 - ”It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions.” Jasmin S Kutter, 2018, - Our observations underscore the urgent need for new knowledge on respiratory virus transmission routes and the implementation of this knowledge in infection control guidelines to advance intervention strategies for currently circulating and newly emerging viruses and to improve public health. - There is a substantial lack of (experimental) evidence on the transmission routes of PIV (types 1–4) and HMPV. - Extensive human rhinovirus transmission experiments have not led to a widely accepted view on the transmission route [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. - However, until today, results on the relative importance of droplet and aerosol transmission of influenza viruses stay inconclusive and hence, there are many reviews intensively discussing this issue [10, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50]. - Despite this, the relative importance of transmission routes of respiratory viruses is still unclear, depending on the heterogeneity of many factors like the environment (e.g. temperature and humidity), pathogen and host [5, 19]. Jonathan Van Tam, 2020 - Conducted these human trials of Flu A in 2013. 52 people were intentionally given "Flu A" and made to live in controlled conditions with 75 people. 0 people sick. 0 PCR positive. J.S. Kutter, 2021 - “Besides nasal discharge, no other signs of illness were observed in the A/H1N1 virus-positive donor and indirect recipient animals.” The animals were subsequently euthanized after the animals experienced what the scientist describe as having breathing difficulties (no further details were given to describe their condition). *Refer to Note 1. Ben Killingley, 2022 - Gave 36 people what he considered to be purified Covid Virus Intranasally. The Results: Nobody got sick. *Refer to Note 2. Notes *Note 1 - Jasmin Kutter, 2021: From the Results section: “Throat and nasal swabs were collected from the donor and indirect recipient animals on alternating days.” This on its own can lead to nasal discharge which is the only “sign of illness” that was noted in this study. *Note 2 - Ben Killingley, 2022: See the video explanation by Jamie here. Ben Killingley also conducted a study in the early 2010's in which he had inoculated people in a room with 75 others some wearing masks others as a control. Not a single person even tested PCR positive. Some links to his previous studies include a 2011, 2019 and a 2020 study. It is assumed that his latest, 2022 study, is a follow up to cover the findings of his previous findings. Some additional notes on the study referenced include: - They gave 10 people the potent nephrotoxin Remdisivir. - They measure sickness by means of a PCR test which isn't indicative of disease because it can tests positive with “asymptomatic” cases as well. - Even if you say that a runny nose after swabbing is Covid. A 50% outcome to a direct challenge of something is a negative result. It doesn't suggest causation which would need to be at least 90%. - The very methods of inoculation used during the study could cause the nasal congestion/discharge (which is their measure of whether someone is sick or not). This has been shown in previous studies. - Lastly nobody was given "regeneron" because nobody got "sick". *Note 3 - Dr Robert Willner, 1994: December 7th 1994 Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Greensboro, N.C., Dr Willner (a medical doctor of 40 years experience) an outspoken whistleblower of the AIDS hoax. In front of a gathering of about 30 alternative-medicine practitioners and several journalists, Willner stuck a needle in the finger of Andres, 27, a Fort Lauderdale student who says he has tested positive for HIV. Then, wincing, the 65-year-old doctor stuck himself. In 1993, Dr. Willner stunned Spain by inoculating himself with the blood of Pedro Tocino, an HIV positive hemophiliac. This demonstration of devotion to the truth and the Hippocratic Oath he took, nearly 40 years before, was reported on the front page of every major newspaper in Spain. His appearance on Spain’s most popular television show envoked a 4 to 1 response by the viewing audience in favor of his position against the “AIDS hypothesis.” When asked why he would put his life on the line to make a point, Dr. Willner replied: “I do this to put a stop to the greatest murderous fraud in medical history. By injecting myself with HIV positive blood, I am proving the point as Dr. Walter Reed did to prove the truth about yellow fever. In this way it is my hope to expose the truth about HIV in the interest of all mankind.” He tested negative multiple times. He died of a Heart attack 4 months later 15th April 1995 (yeh right, funny how these naysayers all die suddenly. Link to the presentation here. Ludicrous “Transmission” Studies The picture of virology’s ludicrousy won’t be complete without a list of studies showing the insanity of what virologists claim to be transmission of disease. This include the injection of fluids into the brains and lungs of animals and we may just include some epidemiological studies to show how these are also not proof of anything. Joe Hendry mostly put it together and the papers we have are as follows (*Please note that this section is open to comments at the moment and anyone that want to add notes or studies are free to leave a comment): Louis Pasteur, 1881 - For rabies, tried to demonstrate transmission by injecting diseased brain tissue "directly onto the surface of the brain of a healthy dog through a hole drilled into its skull." Simon Flexner and Paul A. Lewis, 1910 - Spinal cords from deceased children were ground up and emulsified to be injected into the brains of monkeys. Study explained in detail here. John F. Anderson and Joseph Goldberger, 1911 - Injected blood from a measles patient directly into the heart and brains of monkeys. Carl Tenbroeck, 1918 - A mixture of ground up rat's livers, spleens, kidneys, testicles, lungs, hearts, and brains was injected into the brains of other rats. Claus W. Jungeblut, 1931 - Ground up monkey spinal cord was injected into the brains of other monkeys. Wilson Smith, 1933 - “The infected animal is killed when showing symptoms, often at the beginning of the second temperature rise. The turbinates are scraped out, ground up with sand, and emulsified in about 20 c.cm. of equal parts of broth and saline. The emulsion is lightly centrifuged, and about 1 c.cm. of the supernatant fluid is dropped into the nostrils of another ferret.” Thomas Francis and Jr, T. P. Magill, 1935 - Ground up ferret lung tissue was injected into the brains of rabbits. Ann G. Kuttner and T'sun T'ung, 1935 - Ground up kidney and brain of a guinea pig was injected into the brain of another guinea pig. Erich Traub. April 01 1936 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of guinea pigs. Albert B. Sabin and Peter K. Olitsky, 1937 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of other mice. G. John Buddingh, 1938 - Ground up chick embryo was injected into the brains 2 or 3 day old chicks. Gilbert Dalldorf, 1939 - Ground up ferret spleens was injected into the brains of mice. Claus W. Jungeblut et al, 1942 - Ground up brain or spinal cord of paralyzed mice was injected into the brains of 13 monkeys. Henry Pinkerton and Vicente Moragues, 1942 - Ground up brain tissue from dying mice was injected into the brains of pigeons. C. Kling et al, 1942 - Injected sewage sludge into the brains and abdomen of monkeys. This convinced him that he had isolated a virus and proven that the sewer is a vehicle for polio transmission. D.M. Horstmann, 1944 - Allegedly "proved" that the feces of polio patients contained "poliovirus" by injecting fecal samples into monkeys' brains and spines. Joseph E. Smadel et al, 1945 - Ground up pigeon spleen was injected into the brains of mice. F. Sargent Cheever et al, 1949 - Ground up mouse brain was injected into the brains of rats and hamsters. Isolation Isolation has been well defined in Virus Lie - The Result of 4 Years of Study and to this day there has not been a single paper presented that could show the isolation of a virus without first contaminating the sample. This is shown in detail in the virus lie article and will not be repeated here again. One interesting point that can be captured here is all the studies showing a control test proving that the isolation method used for viruses is flawed. They can be listed as follows: John F Enders, 1954 - Under other agents isolated during the study. "A second agent was obtained from an uninoculated culture of monkey kidney cells. The cytopathic changes it induced in the unstained preparations could not be distinguished with confidence from the viruses isolated from measles." It is highlighted here. Refer to the video explanation here. Image It is further discussed in the paper that "While there is no ground for concluding that the factors in vivo (in the body) are the same as those which underlie the formation of giant cells and the nuclear disturbances in vitro (outside a living organism), the appearance of these phenomena in cultured cells is consistent with the properties that a priori might be associated with the virus of measles.” Image Rustigian et al, 1955 - This paper is described in an article by Viroliegy here (look under Rustigain in the article). Cohen et al, 1955 - This paper is also described in the same article by Viroliegy here (look under Cohen in the article). Bech and von Magnus, 1959 - This paper is also described in the same article by Viroliegy here (look under Von Magnus in the article). F Rapp et al, 1959 - This paper is described in a video by Spacebusters here. Most noteworthy is “Monkey kidney cells, however, are unsuitable for the investigations of the type reported here; Peebles et al. and Ruckle showed that monkeys, and cell cultures derived from them, are often infected with an agent serologically indistinguishable from human measles virus, which causes cytopathic changes in monkey kidney cell cultures almost identical with those caused by human measles virus.” Image Carl J. O’Hara et al, 1988 - The study demonstrated "HIV" particles in 18 out of 20 (90% of) AIDS-related lymph node enlargements but also in 13 out of 15 (88% of) non-AIDS-related enlargements. Which means that particles claimed to be HIV virions are non-specific since identical particles can be found in the majority of patients with enlarged lymph nodes not attributed to AIDS, and at no risk for developing AIDS. Refer to @Aldhissla45’s tweet here. P Gluschankof et al, 1997 - This paper described in a video here with additional notes by Jamie here. Julian W. Bess Jr., 1997 - This paper described in a video here with additional notes by Jamie here. C.A. Cassol, 2020 - This paper is described by Andrew Kaufman here as well as by Thomas Cowan here. “Unofficially” we can also add the Lanka 3 phase control experiment that can be seen here or searched for it here. A further indication of the isolation procedure fallacy is shown in a study during which the CPE becomes more well defined with the addition of specific substances. The study is as follows: Leon Caly et al, 2020 - “Following several failures to recover virions with the characteristic fringes of surface spike proteins, it was found that adding trypsin to the cell culture medium immediately improved virion morphology.” See a video explanation here. Recent Requests and Statements Further and more recent requests and statements that were sent to me by my good friend Courtenay are as follows: May 5, 2022: U.S. CDC and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry confirmed that a search of their records failed to find any that describe anyone on Earth finding an alleged “avian influenza virus” in the bodily fluids of any diseased diseased host (animal or human) and purifying “it”… which is necessary so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments. This can be viewed here. May 20, 2022: Public Health Agency of Canada confirmed that they have no record of any alleged “avian influenza virus” having been found and purified from the bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of any diseased “host” on the planet (in order for “it” to be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments) by anyone, anywhere, ever. Insanely, they insist that: “Viruses” are in hosts despite their utter inability to find them there,. It’s necessary to “grow them” in non-host cells (as if “they” would grow better there than they allegedly grew in the diseased host lol). They pretend that mixing complex substances together results in purification. This can be viewed here. December 20, 2021: Public Health Agency of Canada confirmed that they have no record of any alleged “virus” having been purified from a sample taken from any diseased human on Earth, by anyone, ever, period. To be viewed here. March 11, 2022: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry respond to a FOIA request for all studies / reports in their possession, custody or control describing the purification of any “virus” addressed by any “vaccine” on either their childhood or adult U.S. “immunization” schedule, directly from a sample taken from any diseased "host" on Earth where the sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. CDC/ATSDR provided 5 studies on “rotavirus” (thereby admitting they have no records for any other alleged viruses). None of these 5 studies actually describe isolation/purification of a “rotavirus” from a human. Request, response, studies to be viewed here. March 8, 2023: Italy 2020: Inside Covid’s “Ground zero” in Europe - Three years ago the Western World came to a standstill. The official Covid-19 narrative depicted a strange suddenly-super-spreading, deadlier-than-flu virus hailing from China that landed in Northern Italy. On February 20, 2020 the first alleged case of Covid-19 was discovered in the West in the Lombardy town of Codogno, Italy. Later that day the Italian government reported their first “Covid-19 death.” Dramatic media reports emerging from Northern Italy were hammered into and onto the Western psyche giving the impression there was a mysterious “super spreading” and “super lethal” novel virus galloping across the region infecting and killing scores of people. Read the rest of the report here. Conclusion The above list will be worked on over the coming years. If you think that any corrections need to be made or if you want to add additional studies, please leave a comment. Share Leave a comment https://open.substack.com/pub/dpl003/p/virology-the-damning-evidence?r=29hg4d&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
    OPEN.SUBSTACK.COM
    Virology - The Damning Evidence
    The Stake In The Heart For This Pseudoscientific Profession
    Like
    1
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 28409 Views
  • LOL
    LOL
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 308 Views