
- Please log in to like, share and comment!
- EXPOSE-NEWS.COM9 in every 10 COVID Deaths over the last year have been among the Fully/Triple VaccinatedOfficial figures published by the UK Government reveal the fully/triple vaccinated population have accounted for over 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England over the past year, 91% of all Covid-1…
- WWW.NATURALNEWS.COMMOUSE MEDICINE: Newly approved COVID jabs only tested on mice – just EIGHT of them – and NEVER in humans – NaturalNews.comSo far, the public’s response to the latest and greatest Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” from Pfizer and Moderna that just received approval and emergency use authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is overwhelmingly negative, and for good reason: the shots are untested and unsafe. Almost unbelievably, Newsweek, which just a few years […]$0.00
- WWW.NATURALNEWS.COMVaccine advocate Paul Offit declares healthy Americans do NOT need a COVID “booster” shot – NaturalNews.comThough he has veered very little from his longtime position that all vaccines are safe and effective – and that a child could safely be injected with up to 10,000 of them all at once and survive just fine – pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia is speaking out against the up-and-coming […]$0.12
- Good news for Greywarden!
Even CBS news reported on this.
SARS1 has a patent and classified as a bioweapon. In Florida they now vote to rule the mRNA vaccine as a bioweapon. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2023/07/covid-19-vaccine-is-biological-weapon-must-be-banned-fla-county-gop-says/Good news for Greywarden!
Even CBS news reported on this.
SARS1 has a patent and classified as a bioweapon. In Florida they now vote to rule the mRNA vaccine as a bioweapon. https://americanmilitarynews.com/2023/07/covid-19-vaccine-is-biological-weapon-must-be-banned-fla-county-gop-says/AMERICANMILITARYNEWS.COMCOVID-19 vaccine is 'biological weapon,' must be banned, Fla. county GOP saysThe Brevard County Republican Executive Committee (BREC) recently voted in favor of a resolution classifying the COVID-19 vaccine as a bioweapon as part$6.46 - Part 2 focuses on Bill Gates’ role in pushing the COVID shots on the world, saying we can’t “go back to normal” until almost all 7+ billion people have gotten the shots.
Part 2 focuses on Bill Gates’ role in pushing the COVID shots on the world, saying we can’t “go back to normal” until almost all 7+ billion people have gotten the shots.
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COMCOVID Unmasked: Part II “COVID, Inc.” - Activist PostCOVID UNMASKED: 2020 AND BEYOND is a 4-part documentary that is airing online from Monday September 11 through Thursday September 14. - The FDA said in a statement on Monday that anyone over the age of five is eligible to receive a single dose of the updated vaccine if it is at least two months since their last dose of any other COVID-19 vaccine.
The FDA said in a statement on Monday that anyone over the age of five is eligible to receive a single dose of the updated vaccine if it is at least two months since their last dose of any other COVID-19 vaccine.
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COMThe FDA Approves New Pfizer And Moderna Boosters - Activist PostModerna released a statement saying the company’s updated boosters are expected to work well against the new variant called “Pirola.” - Ataca nuevamente la propaganda del miedo...
Dos escuelas secundarias de California confirmaron que cancelaron partidos de fútbol debido a casos de COVID-19 entre los estudiantes, en medio de la preocupación de que las normas relacionadas con el virus puedan volver a aplicarse en los próximos meses. https://es.theepochtimes.com/vuelven-las-cancelaciones-por-el-covid-institutos-de-california-cancelan-partidos-de-futbol_1173854.htmlAtaca nuevamente la propaganda del miedo...
Dos escuelas secundarias de California confirmaron que cancelaron partidos de fútbol debido a casos de COVID-19 entre los estudiantes, en medio de la preocupación de que las normas relacionadas con el virus puedan volver a aplicarse en los próximos meses. https://es.theepochtimes.com/vuelven-las-cancelaciones-por-el-covid-institutos-de-california-cancelan-partidos-de-futbol_1173854.html - The COVID Crisis may officially be over; however, health agencies worldwide are still warning about COVID-19, its variants, and “Long COVID.” Doctors worldwide have also been treating patients for what’s being referred to as “Long Vax.”
The COVID Crisis may officially be over; however, health agencies worldwide are still warning about COVID-19, its variants, and “Long COVID.” Doctors worldwide have also been treating patients for what’s being referred to as “Long Vax.”
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COMDoctors Are Treating Patients for Clots Caused by COVID, COVID Vaccines, or Both (Online Town Hall Scheduled This Week) - Activist PostFull Measure News has started its 9th season with a segment about this and will be airing a one-hour town hall September 12th. - Hey guys hope you all are well
"My Last Best Friend" releases on September 15th. It's about two men named Walter Stoyanov during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, one falling ill while the other is investigated by FBI Agent John McCallany
#SoMee #awsme #movieloverHey guys hope you all are well
"My Last Best Friend" releases on September 15th. It's about two men named Walter Stoyanov during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, one falling ill while the other is investigated by FBI Agent John McCallany
#SoMee #awsme #movielover$0.19 - They refused to produce information on an illegal Chinese lab that was "caught red-handed conducting dangerous research related to COVID-19 and other deadly diseases without a license by FBI agents and California officials."
They refused to produce information on an illegal Chinese lab that was "caught red-handed conducting dangerous research related to COVID-19 and other deadly diseases without a license by FBI agents and California officials."
WWW.ACTIVISTPOST.COMFBI, HHS Stonewalling Congress Over Illegal Chinese COVID Lab In California - Activist PostThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tested the substances and detected at least 20 potentially infectious agents. - WWW.NATURALNEWS.COMOBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: FDA refusing to provide COVID “vaccine” safety data to Congress as requested – NaturalNews.comThe United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is refusing to comply with a request from Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) for Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” safety data. Earlier in the year, the FDA conducted a series of analyses based on data collected from the government-run Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tracks injuries and […]$0.14
- I have been looking for attornies to represent me on my religious discrimination case against the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. I was referred to an attorney by the name of Michael Julien, who's phone number is 561-995-9990. This attorney is a complete scumbag and deceiver who thought i was some pushover or something.
He cannot be an expert on Title VII as he falsely claims, as most of his assertions are in fact contradictory to Title VII. I will expose all of the flaws in the logic he brought up and i refuted in our conversation today.
1. According to this "Title VII attorney," who named pretty much all of the medical industries and agencies both Public and Private, who all agree that Covid is hazardous, is all the evidence the court needs to throw my case out. This of course means that he takes the recomendations of agencies such as the CDC as Law, and from his arguments it seems as he believes they Legislate Law. 25 years of experience in Law and Title VII has not helped him one bit. Unless he is trying to find ways to skirt the Law!
CDC recomendations aren't equal to Law. The United States is a Country of Laws not about the Science nor any of their recomendations. The CDC, CMS nor any other agency cannot impose laws that violate my religious rights nor anyone elses. The University of Miami using these agencies to justify their religious discrimination is ridiclous and will not fly. The point this horrible attorney was trying to make is, that the court was going to decide that the University of Miami was within their rights to not accomodate my sincerely held religious beliefs against the nasal swab because of the science as stupid as this may sound. In other words. The courts according to this scumbag would not rule according to Title VII Law. The Courts would rule in favor of the University of Miami because they would consider the science over the actual law.
This attorney spent most of his time talking to me about these health care institutions and their recomendations and completely avoided discussing Civil Rights Laws and that under no circumstances can someone's sincerely held religious beliefs be violated by an Employer. He continued using the very bad argument that the University of Miami is an at will employer that can fire individuals for any reason, or no reason at all. Although he is correct that they are an at will Employer, all Employers nation wide are required to abide by Civil Rights Laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Religion is a protected class, and no Employer can fire anyone because his religious beliefs conflict with a requirement of the Employer. The Employer needs to find a reasonable accomodation of which the University of Miami refused an accomodation which is a violation of Title VII.
2. According to this Lawyer, i need to prove to the courts that my religious beliefs need to be consistent, and even claims that the courts would try and scrutinize your past to see if it is consistent with your sincerely held religious beliefs. This lawyer says that if you for example have vaccinated your children or yourself in the past. The court will throw out your case and you will lose.
I will refute this postion in depth, as i did it verbally on the phone and was driving while speaking to this lawyer. I say to him 25 years of Law my ass. He is a complete scumbag and deserves to be exposed.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says as follows pertaining to the consistency of an employees religious beliefs. Section 12 Religious discrimination: [21] The Supreme Court has made it clear that it is not a court’s role to determine the reasonableness of an individual’s religious beliefs, and that “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”[22] An employee’s belief, observance, or practice can be “religious” under Title VII even if the employee is affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief, observance, or practice, or if few – or no – other people adhere to it.[23]
Source: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#h_9593682596821610748647076
Two points he made in our conversation were refuted on the above source. 1. He said that my religion which is Jewish would disqualify me from having a belief that isn't particularly taught by most Jews. The fact that a belief can be “religious” under Title VII even if the employee is affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief, observance, or practice, or if few – or no – other people adhere to it, completely refutes this lawyer with 25 years of experience in Law.
The second Point is the fact that “religious beliefs do not need to be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection," clearly refutes this scumbag's line of argumentation. Furthermore, Title VII does say that religiois beliefs can evolve and even change, which completely refutes the position of this scumbag lawyer.
Source: Employers should be aware that an employee’s religious beliefs and practices may evolve or change over time, and that this may result in requests for additional or different accommodations.[241] Similarly, the employer has the right to discontinue a previously granted accommodation that is no longer utilized for religious purposes or subsequently poses an undue hardship. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#h_71848579934051610749830452
Considering the above evidence from Title VII, the Employee's beliefs can change and the Employer is obligated to accomodate the Employee's new belief, which is completely contrary to what this lawyer said over the phone that an employee's religious beliefs are unchanging and thus his past decisions determines his fate in the court of Law, and thus the courts would actually throw out a case where the Court finds that an individual's religious beliefs are not consistent with past decisions. Is this really a Title VII expert? I believe this man, such as many idiot lawyers that don't even know how to letigate like him, are either imposters, or are prostitutes of Corporations such as the University Of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
I can go on the whole day refuting this guy who claims to be a Title VII lawyer. If you live in Florida, please make sure you tell people not to contact this incompetent fool named Michael Julien!I have been looking for attornies to represent me on my religious discrimination case against the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine. I was referred to an attorney by the name of Michael Julien, who's phone number is 561-995-9990. This attorney is a complete scumbag and deceiver who thought i was some pushover or something.
He cannot be an expert on Title VII as he falsely claims, as most of his assertions are in fact contradictory to Title VII. I will expose all of the flaws in the logic he brought up and i refuted in our conversation today.
1. According to this "Title VII attorney," who named pretty much all of the medical industries and agencies both Public and Private, who all agree that Covid is hazardous, is all the evidence the court needs to throw my case out. This of course means that he takes the recomendations of agencies such as the CDC as Law, and from his arguments it seems as he believes they Legislate Law. 25 years of experience in Law and Title VII has not helped him one bit. Unless he is trying to find ways to skirt the Law!
CDC recomendations aren't equal to Law. The United States is a Country of Laws not about the Science nor any of their recomendations. The CDC, CMS nor any other agency cannot impose laws that violate my religious rights nor anyone elses. The University of Miami using these agencies to justify their religious discrimination is ridiclous and will not fly. The point this horrible attorney was trying to make is, that the court was going to decide that the University of Miami was within their rights to not accomodate my sincerely held religious beliefs against the nasal swab because of the science as stupid as this may sound. In other words. The courts according to this scumbag would not rule according to Title VII Law. The Courts would rule in favor of the University of Miami because they would consider the science over the actual law.
This attorney spent most of his time talking to me about these health care institutions and their recomendations and completely avoided discussing Civil Rights Laws and that under no circumstances can someone's sincerely held religious beliefs be violated by an Employer. He continued using the very bad argument that the University of Miami is an at will employer that can fire individuals for any reason, or no reason at all. Although he is correct that they are an at will Employer, all Employers nation wide are required to abide by Civil Rights Laws such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Religion is a protected class, and no Employer can fire anyone because his religious beliefs conflict with a requirement of the Employer. The Employer needs to find a reasonable accomodation of which the University of Miami refused an accomodation which is a violation of Title VII.
2. According to this Lawyer, i need to prove to the courts that my religious beliefs need to be consistent, and even claims that the courts would try and scrutinize your past to see if it is consistent with your sincerely held religious beliefs. This lawyer says that if you for example have vaccinated your children or yourself in the past. The court will throw out your case and you will lose.
I will refute this postion in depth, as i did it verbally on the phone and was driving while speaking to this lawyer. I say to him 25 years of Law my ass. He is a complete scumbag and deserves to be exposed.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says as follows pertaining to the consistency of an employees religious beliefs. Section 12 Religious discrimination: [21] The Supreme Court has made it clear that it is not a court’s role to determine the reasonableness of an individual’s religious beliefs, and that “religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection.”[22] An employee’s belief, observance, or practice can be “religious” under Title VII even if the employee is affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief, observance, or practice, or if few – or no – other people adhere to it.[23]
Source: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#h_9593682596821610748647076
Two points he made in our conversation were refuted on the above source. 1. He said that my religion which is Jewish would disqualify me from having a belief that isn't particularly taught by most Jews. The fact that a belief can be “religious” under Title VII even if the employee is affiliated with a religious group that does not espouse or recognize that individual’s belief, observance, or practice, or if few – or no – other people adhere to it, completely refutes this lawyer with 25 years of experience in Law.
The second Point is the fact that “religious beliefs do not need to be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection," clearly refutes this scumbag's line of argumentation. Furthermore, Title VII does say that religiois beliefs can evolve and even change, which completely refutes the position of this scumbag lawyer.
Source: Employers should be aware that an employee’s religious beliefs and practices may evolve or change over time, and that this may result in requests for additional or different accommodations.[241] Similarly, the employer has the right to discontinue a previously granted accommodation that is no longer utilized for religious purposes or subsequently poses an undue hardship. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination#h_71848579934051610749830452
Considering the above evidence from Title VII, the Employee's beliefs can change and the Employer is obligated to accomodate the Employee's new belief, which is completely contrary to what this lawyer said over the phone that an employee's religious beliefs are unchanging and thus his past decisions determines his fate in the court of Law, and thus the courts would actually throw out a case where the Court finds that an individual's religious beliefs are not consistent with past decisions. Is this really a Title VII expert? I believe this man, such as many idiot lawyers that don't even know how to letigate like him, are either imposters, or are prostitutes of Corporations such as the University Of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
I can go on the whole day refuting this guy who claims to be a Title VII lawyer. If you live in Florida, please make sure you tell people not to contact this incompetent fool named Michael Julien!Section 12: Religious DiscriminationNotice Concerning the Undue Hardship Standard in Title VII Religious Accommodation Cases. This document was issued prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in Groff v. DeJoy, 143 S. Ct. 2279 (2023).$0.51 - WWW.NATURALNEWS.COMDespite rebuke from 5th Circuit Court towards FDA, U.S. pharmacists STILL refusing to fill ivermectin prescriptions – NaturalNews.comThe first line of opposition to ivermectin all throughout the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “pandemic” was the government itself, and mainly the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, now that the FDA is being forced by the courts to concede that Americans are, in fact, free to take ivermectin for COVID if they so choose, […]$1.12
- WWW.NATURALNEWS.COMCNN once again fearmongering about COVID to scare everyone back into masks – DON’T BE FOOLED – NaturalNews.comNow that public interest in the “vaccines” has pretty much dropped to zero, the fake news media is once again trying to stir up fear about the latest strains of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) in the hopes that it will scare enough people into once again wearing a mask. CNN ran wild with headlines recently […]$0.23
More Results
© 2023 SoMee Social
English
