• Metabolomics Services Market Forecasts to 2035: Global Industry Growth, Share, Size, Trends
    The metabolomics market size is expected to grow at compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% during the forecast period.
    At present, around 180 players across the globe claim to have the required capabilities to offer metabolomics services for biological analysis and profiling of small molecules.
    During our research we were able to identify about 180 players, that are actively engaged in providing metabolomics services. Majority of the metabolomics service providers are non-industry players. This could be attributed to the fact that the domain requires high-end expertise and significant investment, however, the return on such lucrative investments is limited.
    During our research, we observed that majority the players offer both study design and sample preparation services; notable examples include Afekta Technologies and SGS.
    Furthermore, targeted metabolomics emerged as the most common type of metabolomics service offered by both industry and non-industry players; examples of start-ups (small and very small firms) offering this service include (in alphabetical order, based in Asia), BioXenClue, Cytomics, Novelgene Technologies. Additionally, we came across companies that provide untargeted metabolomics services.
    The metabolomics services market is highly fragmented, featuring the presence of very small / small, mid-sized, large / very large companies. Further, majority of the companies are based in North America, followed by those headquartered in Europe. This can be attributed to the favorable environment and regulatory landscape offered by these geographies, which further enables the sponsors to outsource their business processes without much concern regarding safety and quality.
    During our research, we observed that majority of the service providers offer metabolomics services using mass spectrometry, followed by nuclear magnetic resonance. Out of the players which employ mass spectrometry, majority of the players utilize liquid chromatography-based separation technique.
    Furthermore, maximum number of players offer metabolomics services for biomarker discovery; examples include DNA Xperts and Novelgene Technologies. This is followed by companies that perform metabolomics studies for disease diagnostics, toxicological testing, drug discovery and personalized medicine purposes. Examples of players offering metabolomics solutions to support disease diagnostics include Evotec and Synbio Technologies.
    In order to outshine their services and drive compliance to evolving industry benchmarks, providers are keen to integrate advanced technologies and ink strategic agreements that can attract a wider audience
    In order to determine the relative competitiveness of metabolomics service providers, we focused on several relevant parameters, such as, service portfolio strength (in terms of number of pre-profiling services offered, number of additional services offered, type metabolome profiling technique used, type of approach used for data analysis, type of biological sample analyzed, source of biological sample analyzed and area of application) and partnership strength (in terms of number of partnerships and type of agreement).
    Additionally, the insights on company competitiveness have been presented in the form of a3D bubble chart, with the company’s experience on the x-axis and competitiveness on the y-axis. Further, the size of the bubble indicates the number of metabolomics services offered by the company.
    The most prominent player based on company competitiveness offers a wide range of metabolomics services, including experimental design, sample preparation, targeted metabolomics and untargeted metabolomics for biomarker discovery, drug discovery and personalized medicine applications. In addition, the company has signed partnerships during the period 2014-2022. Examples of other prominent small players in this domain include Proteomics and Synbio Technologies. It is also worth mentioning that a majority of firms in this peer group are based in North America.
    Thank you for reading our report. Kindly get in touch with us to know more about the report or to receive a customized copy of it. Our team will ensure the report is tailored according to your needs.
    To view more details on this report, click on the link
    https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/metabolomics-services-market.html

    About Roots Analysis
    Roots Analysis is a global leader in the pharma / biotech market research. Having worked with over 750 clients worldwide, including Fortune 500 companies, start-ups, academia, venture capitalists and strategic investors for more than a decade, we offer a highly analytical / data-driven perspective to a network of over 450,000 senior industry stakeholders looking for credible market insights.
    We specialise in analysing areas which have lacked quality research so far or require more focused understanding within the broader industry. All our reports are structured in a way to enable the reader develop a thorough perspective on the given subject. Apart from writing reports on identified areas, we also provide bespoke research / consulting services dedicated to serve our clients in the best possible way.
    The research efforts are driven by a global team. The leadership team brings a wealth of experience within the sector. Their collective experience in pharmaceutical / affiliated domains allows us to tackle various areas of research in a structured way. We also regularly leverage our global network of experts who hold senior leadership positions in reputed firms and organisations worldwide.
    Contact Details
    Roots Analysis
    Gaurav Chaudhary
    +1 (415) 800 3415
    +44 (122) 391 1091
    [email protected]
    Website: https://www.rootsanalysis.com/

    Browse for more Report Promotions
    https://genius.com/BarbraSmith
    https://knowyourmeme.com/users/fabiola-wong
    https://app.readthedocs.org/profiles/[email protected]/
    https://blog.ulifestyle.com.hk/singlecell
    https://medibang.com/topic/t92501131112470110026905444/
    https://getinkspired.com/en/blog/527696/post/1503717/global-car-t-cell-therapy-market-forecast-to-2035/
    https://penzu.com/public/72adf2f075dd918c
    https://kumu.io/lipsi/renewable-sustainable-laboratory-plasticware-market#untitled-map-2
    https://apk.tw/space-uid-6826581.html
    https://teletype.in/@fabiolawong570/dTVYXRVqPXo
    https://beacons.ai/barbrasmith
    https://skitterphoto.com/photographers/138823/fabiola-wong
    https://mstdn.animexx.de/@fabiolawong570
    https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/u/barbrasmith927
    https://bjgplife.com/mastodon-for-gps-embrace-the-features-and-the-future/#comment-14080
    Metabolomics Services Market Forecasts to 2035: Global Industry Growth, Share, Size, Trends The metabolomics market size is expected to grow at compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% during the forecast period. At present, around 180 players across the globe claim to have the required capabilities to offer metabolomics services for biological analysis and profiling of small molecules. During our research we were able to identify about 180 players, that are actively engaged in providing metabolomics services. Majority of the metabolomics service providers are non-industry players. This could be attributed to the fact that the domain requires high-end expertise and significant investment, however, the return on such lucrative investments is limited. During our research, we observed that majority the players offer both study design and sample preparation services; notable examples include Afekta Technologies and SGS. Furthermore, targeted metabolomics emerged as the most common type of metabolomics service offered by both industry and non-industry players; examples of start-ups (small and very small firms) offering this service include (in alphabetical order, based in Asia), BioXenClue, Cytomics, Novelgene Technologies. Additionally, we came across companies that provide untargeted metabolomics services. The metabolomics services market is highly fragmented, featuring the presence of very small / small, mid-sized, large / very large companies. Further, majority of the companies are based in North America, followed by those headquartered in Europe. This can be attributed to the favorable environment and regulatory landscape offered by these geographies, which further enables the sponsors to outsource their business processes without much concern regarding safety and quality. During our research, we observed that majority of the service providers offer metabolomics services using mass spectrometry, followed by nuclear magnetic resonance. Out of the players which employ mass spectrometry, majority of the players utilize liquid chromatography-based separation technique. Furthermore, maximum number of players offer metabolomics services for biomarker discovery; examples include DNA Xperts and Novelgene Technologies. This is followed by companies that perform metabolomics studies for disease diagnostics, toxicological testing, drug discovery and personalized medicine purposes. Examples of players offering metabolomics solutions to support disease diagnostics include Evotec and Synbio Technologies. In order to outshine their services and drive compliance to evolving industry benchmarks, providers are keen to integrate advanced technologies and ink strategic agreements that can attract a wider audience In order to determine the relative competitiveness of metabolomics service providers, we focused on several relevant parameters, such as, service portfolio strength (in terms of number of pre-profiling services offered, number of additional services offered, type metabolome profiling technique used, type of approach used for data analysis, type of biological sample analyzed, source of biological sample analyzed and area of application) and partnership strength (in terms of number of partnerships and type of agreement). Additionally, the insights on company competitiveness have been presented in the form of a3D bubble chart, with the company’s experience on the x-axis and competitiveness on the y-axis. Further, the size of the bubble indicates the number of metabolomics services offered by the company. The most prominent player based on company competitiveness offers a wide range of metabolomics services, including experimental design, sample preparation, targeted metabolomics and untargeted metabolomics for biomarker discovery, drug discovery and personalized medicine applications. In addition, the company has signed partnerships during the period 2014-2022. Examples of other prominent small players in this domain include Proteomics and Synbio Technologies. It is also worth mentioning that a majority of firms in this peer group are based in North America. Thank you for reading our report. Kindly get in touch with us to know more about the report or to receive a customized copy of it. Our team will ensure the report is tailored according to your needs. To view more details on this report, click on the link https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/metabolomics-services-market.html About Roots Analysis Roots Analysis is a global leader in the pharma / biotech market research. Having worked with over 750 clients worldwide, including Fortune 500 companies, start-ups, academia, venture capitalists and strategic investors for more than a decade, we offer a highly analytical / data-driven perspective to a network of over 450,000 senior industry stakeholders looking for credible market insights. We specialise in analysing areas which have lacked quality research so far or require more focused understanding within the broader industry. All our reports are structured in a way to enable the reader develop a thorough perspective on the given subject. Apart from writing reports on identified areas, we also provide bespoke research / consulting services dedicated to serve our clients in the best possible way. The research efforts are driven by a global team. The leadership team brings a wealth of experience within the sector. Their collective experience in pharmaceutical / affiliated domains allows us to tackle various areas of research in a structured way. We also regularly leverage our global network of experts who hold senior leadership positions in reputed firms and organisations worldwide. Contact Details Roots Analysis Gaurav Chaudhary +1 (415) 800 3415 +44 (122) 391 1091 [email protected] Website: https://www.rootsanalysis.com/ Browse for more Report Promotions • https://genius.com/BarbraSmith • https://knowyourmeme.com/users/fabiola-wong • https://app.readthedocs.org/profiles/[email protected]/ • https://blog.ulifestyle.com.hk/singlecell • https://medibang.com/topic/t92501131112470110026905444/ • https://getinkspired.com/en/blog/527696/post/1503717/global-car-t-cell-therapy-market-forecast-to-2035/ • https://penzu.com/public/72adf2f075dd918c • https://kumu.io/lipsi/renewable-sustainable-laboratory-plasticware-market#untitled-map-2 • https://apk.tw/space-uid-6826581.html • https://teletype.in/@fabiolawong570/dTVYXRVqPXo • https://beacons.ai/barbrasmith • https://skitterphoto.com/photographers/138823/fabiola-wong • https://mstdn.animexx.de/@fabiolawong570 • https://www.ultimate-guitar.com/u/barbrasmith927 • https://bjgplife.com/mastodon-for-gps-embrace-the-features-and-the-future/#comment-14080
    WWW.ROOTSANALYSIS.COM
    Metabolomics Market Size, Share, Revenue Growth 2035
    The metabolomics market size is expected to grow at compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.9% during the forecast period.
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 7503 Vue
  • Vaccines Market Size Analysis, Drivers, Restraints, Key Factors Forecast, 2035

    Overview of the Global Vaccines Market

    The Global Vaccines Market Report provides a detailed analysis of the vaccines industry, highlighting key business strategies, current trends, and both qualitative and quantitative insights. This comprehensive report examines significant aspects of the market, including key drivers, restraints, growth prospects, and potential risks. It also evaluates the competitive landscape and regional dynamics, particularly in light of the ongoing changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Market Dynamics

    The vaccines market is experiencing notable expansion, driven by the entry of new players and evolving market segments. The report emphasizes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the industry, assessing both current and future implications. It includes a thorough analysis of mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, product launches, and joint ventures that shape the market landscape.

    Key Companies

    Prominent companies in the vaccines market include:

    Bio Farma
    Emergent BioSolutions
    GC Pharma
    GlaxoSmithKline
    Janssen
    Merck
    Novavax
    Pfizer
    Sanofi Pasteur
    Valneva
    Market Segmentation

    The report categorizes the vaccines market based on several criteria:

    Type of Vaccine: Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine, Influenza Vaccine, Rotavirus Vaccine, Varicella Vaccine, DTP-Hep B-Hib Vaccine, Meningococcal Group A, C, Y and W-135 Vaccine, and others.
    Type of Vaccine API: Live Attenuated Vaccine, Inactivated Vaccine, Conjugate Vaccine, Subunit Vaccine, Toxoid Vaccine, and others.
    Route of Administration: Intramuscular, Subcutaneous, Oral, Intranasal, Intradermal, and others.
    Target Patient Population: Pediatric and Adults.
    Regional Analysis

    The report provides a comprehensive regional analysis, covering:

    North America (U.S., Canada)
    Europe (U.K., Italy, Germany, France, Rest of EU)
    Asia Pacific (India, Japan, China, South Korea, Australia, Rest of APAC)
    Latin America (Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America)
    Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, U.A.E., South Africa, Rest of MEA)
    To know more about the report, visit @ https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/preventive-vaccines/318.html

    Market Forecast

    The global vaccines market is projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting a rise from $87.57 billion in 2024 to $159.28 billion by 2032, reflecting a CAGR of 7.8% during this period. Another forecast indicates the market could reach $216.30 billion by 2030, growing from $135.28 billion in 2022

    Conclusion

    This report serves as a vital resource for understanding the vaccines market, offering insights into market dynamics, competitive strategies, and future growth opportunities. It is structured to facilitate informed decision-making for stakeholders looking to navigate this evolving industry landscape.

    Contact Details

    Roots Analysis

    Gaurav Chaudhary

    +1 (415) 800 3415

    +44 (122) 391 1091

    [email protected]

    Website: https://www.rootsanalysis.com/



    Browse for more related promotions

    https://www.cowcow.com/user/Chris887-3635909/profile

    https://staging.partners.org/myapnea.org/members/gayle990/posts

    https://app.daily.dev/posts/biopesticides-market-size-competitive-landscape-revenue-analysis-2035-kj0kl0tuv

    https://multiurok.ru/blog/biopesticides-market-size-revenue-share-drivers-trends-analysis-2035.html

    https://community.progress.com/s/profile/005Pb00000E8mPC

    https://participation.lillemetropole.fr/profiles/chris88/activity

    https://www.alpenvereinaktiv.com/de/member/chris-gayle/305211183/

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/492625

    https://www.wattpad.com/user/chrisgayle2322

    https://notes.qoo-app.com/en/note/3575342

    https://www.racked.com/users/Chris9076

    Vaccines Market Size Analysis, Drivers, Restraints, Key Factors Forecast, 2035 Overview of the Global Vaccines Market The Global Vaccines Market Report provides a detailed analysis of the vaccines industry, highlighting key business strategies, current trends, and both qualitative and quantitative insights. This comprehensive report examines significant aspects of the market, including key drivers, restraints, growth prospects, and potential risks. It also evaluates the competitive landscape and regional dynamics, particularly in light of the ongoing changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Market Dynamics The vaccines market is experiencing notable expansion, driven by the entry of new players and evolving market segments. The report emphasizes the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the industry, assessing both current and future implications. It includes a thorough analysis of mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, product launches, and joint ventures that shape the market landscape. Key Companies Prominent companies in the vaccines market include: Bio Farma Emergent BioSolutions GC Pharma GlaxoSmithKline Janssen Merck Novavax Pfizer Sanofi Pasteur Valneva Market Segmentation The report categorizes the vaccines market based on several criteria: Type of Vaccine: Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine, Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine, Influenza Vaccine, Rotavirus Vaccine, Varicella Vaccine, DTP-Hep B-Hib Vaccine, Meningococcal Group A, C, Y and W-135 Vaccine, and others. Type of Vaccine API: Live Attenuated Vaccine, Inactivated Vaccine, Conjugate Vaccine, Subunit Vaccine, Toxoid Vaccine, and others. Route of Administration: Intramuscular, Subcutaneous, Oral, Intranasal, Intradermal, and others. Target Patient Population: Pediatric and Adults. Regional Analysis The report provides a comprehensive regional analysis, covering: North America (U.S., Canada) Europe (U.K., Italy, Germany, France, Rest of EU) Asia Pacific (India, Japan, China, South Korea, Australia, Rest of APAC) Latin America (Chile, Brazil, Argentina, Rest of Latin America) Middle East & Africa (Saudi Arabia, U.A.E., South Africa, Rest of MEA) To know more about the report, visit @ https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/preventive-vaccines/318.html Market Forecast The global vaccines market is projected to grow significantly, with estimates suggesting a rise from $87.57 billion in 2024 to $159.28 billion by 2032, reflecting a CAGR of 7.8% during this period. Another forecast indicates the market could reach $216.30 billion by 2030, growing from $135.28 billion in 2022 Conclusion This report serves as a vital resource for understanding the vaccines market, offering insights into market dynamics, competitive strategies, and future growth opportunities. It is structured to facilitate informed decision-making for stakeholders looking to navigate this evolving industry landscape. Contact Details Roots Analysis Gaurav Chaudhary +1 (415) 800 3415 +44 (122) 391 1091 [email protected] Website: https://www.rootsanalysis.com/ Browse for more related promotions https://www.cowcow.com/user/Chris887-3635909/profile https://staging.partners.org/myapnea.org/members/gayle990/posts https://app.daily.dev/posts/biopesticides-market-size-competitive-landscape-revenue-analysis-2035-kj0kl0tuv https://multiurok.ru/blog/biopesticides-market-size-revenue-share-drivers-trends-analysis-2035.html https://community.progress.com/s/profile/005Pb00000E8mPC https://participation.lillemetropole.fr/profiles/chris88/activity https://www.alpenvereinaktiv.com/de/member/chris-gayle/305211183/ https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/492625 https://www.wattpad.com/user/chrisgayle2322 https://notes.qoo-app.com/en/note/3575342 https://www.racked.com/users/Chris9076
    WWW.ROOTSANALYSIS.COM
    Vaccines Market Size, Share, Analysis, Industry Report [2030]
    The vaccines market size is estimated to grow from $48 billion in 2024 to $94 billion by 2030, representing a CAGR of 11.9%, during the forecast period 2024-2030.
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 7927 Vue
  • DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE Price in India: Which Drone is Better for Indian Consumers?

    When it comes to choosing a drone, DJI has made its mark with two standout models: the DJI Mini 3 Pro and the DJI Mini 2 SE. Both drones offer exceptional value, but which one is the best choice for Indian consumers? In this article, we'll compare these two popular models based on price, performance, camera quality, and features to help you make an informed decision.

    1. Price Breakdown: DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE in India
    DJI Mini 3 Pro Price in India
    The DJI Mini 3 Pro is a premium drone that comes with a higher price tag. As of now, the price for the DJI Mini 3 Pro price in India ranges from ₹91,000 to ₹95,000, depending on the configuration you choose. This price includes advanced features like superior camera quality, obstacle avoidance, and intelligent flight modes, making it a top-tier option for both amateur and professional drone enthusiasts.

    DJI Mini 2 SE Price in India
    The DJI Mini 2 SE, on the other hand, is a more affordable alternative. In India, it is priced at around ₹34,999, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious buyers or beginners who want to experience drone flying without making a large investment. Despite being more affordable, the Mini 2 SE still offers great value with solid performance for its price.

    2. Camera Quality: A Key Differentiator
    DJI Mini 3 Pro Camera
    The DJI Mini 3 Pro stands out with its impressive 48MP camera and 4K video recording at 60fps, which delivers highly detailed and vibrant footage. Whether you're shooting landscapes, real estate videos, or cinematic content, the Mini 3 Pro offers unparalleled image quality, even in low-light conditions. The three-axis gimbal ensures that your shots remain stable and smooth, even in windy conditions.

    Camera Resolution: 48MP
    Video Resolution: 4K at 60fps
    Gimbal: 3-axis stabilization
    Low-Light Performance: Excellent
    DJI Mini 2 SE Camera
    The DJI Mini 2 SE comes with a 12MP camera, which offers solid quality for casual use and basic content creation. It supports 4K video at 30fps, making it perfect for beginners who want high-definition video without the complexity or price of a professional drone. While the camera resolution isn’t as high as the Mini 3 Pro, it still offers great performance for standard recreational flying and social media content.

    Camera Resolution: 12MP
    Video Resolution: 4K at 30fps
    Gimbal: 2-axis stabilization
    Low-Light Performance: Good for general use

    3. Battery Life: How Long Can You Fly?
    DJI Mini 3 Pro Battery Life
    The DJI Mini 3 Pro offers an outstanding flight time of up to 34 minutes with the standard battery and can be extended to 47 minutes with the larger battery option. This extended battery life is ideal for professional use, particularly if you need to capture long aerial shots or need more time to explore larger areas.

    DJI Mini 2 SE Battery Life
    The DJI Mini 2 SE provides a slightly shorter flight time, up to 31 minutes per charge. While it’s not as long as the Mini 3 Pro, it still offers a solid duration for casual drone flights, perfect for new pilots or short photography sessions.

    4. Flight Features and Performance: What Sets Them Apart?
    DJI Mini 3 Pro Performance
    The Mini 3 Pro is packed with advanced features, making it suitable for both hobbyists and more serious drone pilots. It comes with obstacle sensors on the front, back, and bottom, making it safer to fly in tight or cluttered spaces.

    Obstacle Avoidance: Yes (front, rear, downward)
    Flight Modes: ActiveTrack, FocusTrack, Mastershots, and more
    Max Speed: 16 m/s (approximately 57.6 km/h)
    Advanced Stability: Yes, even in windy conditions
    DJI Mini 2 SE Performance
    The Mini 2 SE is designed for beginner and intermediate drone users who want a simple, fun, and safe flying experience. While it lacks advanced obstacle avoidance sensors, it still offers GPS stability and QuickShots, which help capture creative shots with ease. Its maximum speed is slower than the Mini 3 Pro, but still suitable for most recreational flights.

    Obstacle Avoidance: No
    Flight Modes: QuickShots (Dronie, Circle, Helix)
    Max Speed: 8 m/s (approximately 28.8 km/h)
    Stability: Good for casual flying

    5. Which Drone Should You Choose in India?
    When deciding between the DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE, it ultimately boils down to your budget and requirements.

    Choose the DJI Mini 3 Pro if:
    You need professional-grade camera quality, with 4K video at 60fps and a 48MP camera.
    You want advanced flight features like obstacle avoidance, ActiveTrack, and FocusTrack.
    You’re a content creator, real estate agent, or professional photographer looking to elevate your shots.
    You’re willing to invest in a drone with extended flight time and more powerful performance.
    You require superior stability and safety features for complex flying environments.
    Choose the DJI Mini 2 SE if:
    You are a beginner or hobbyist looking for an affordable and easy-to-use drone.
    You need a drone with good image quality for casual use, social media content, or fun flights.
    You’re okay with fewer advanced features, such as the lack of obstacle avoidance and fewer intelligent flight modes.
    You don’t mind a shorter flight time and a more basic performance compared to the Mini 3 Pro.

    Conclusion: Which Drone is the Right Choice for You?
    Both the DJI Mini 3 Pro and DJI Mini 2 SE are excellent drones, but they cater to different types of users. The Mini 3 Pro is the best choice for those seeking a top-tier drone with professional-level performance, while the Mini 2 SE is perfect for beginners or those on a budget who still want a solid drone for recreational flying.

    If you’re looking for exceptional image quality, advanced flight features, and longer flight time, the DJI Mini 3 Pro in India is the better choice, albeit at a higher price. On the other hand, if you're just starting out or prefer a simpler, more affordable option, the DJI Mini 2 SE offers excellent value at a fraction of the price.
    Ultimately, both drones provide great performance for their respective price points, making either choice a good investment for Indian consumers looking to explore the world of drone flying.
    For more information you can visit - https://flyandtech.com/


    DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE Price in India: Which Drone is Better for Indian Consumers? When it comes to choosing a drone, DJI has made its mark with two standout models: the DJI Mini 3 Pro and the DJI Mini 2 SE. Both drones offer exceptional value, but which one is the best choice for Indian consumers? In this article, we'll compare these two popular models based on price, performance, camera quality, and features to help you make an informed decision. 1. Price Breakdown: DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE in India DJI Mini 3 Pro Price in India The DJI Mini 3 Pro is a premium drone that comes with a higher price tag. As of now, the price for the DJI Mini 3 Pro price in India ranges from ₹91,000 to ₹95,000, depending on the configuration you choose. This price includes advanced features like superior camera quality, obstacle avoidance, and intelligent flight modes, making it a top-tier option for both amateur and professional drone enthusiasts. DJI Mini 2 SE Price in India The DJI Mini 2 SE, on the other hand, is a more affordable alternative. In India, it is priced at around ₹34,999, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious buyers or beginners who want to experience drone flying without making a large investment. Despite being more affordable, the Mini 2 SE still offers great value with solid performance for its price. 2. Camera Quality: A Key Differentiator DJI Mini 3 Pro Camera The DJI Mini 3 Pro stands out with its impressive 48MP camera and 4K video recording at 60fps, which delivers highly detailed and vibrant footage. Whether you're shooting landscapes, real estate videos, or cinematic content, the Mini 3 Pro offers unparalleled image quality, even in low-light conditions. The three-axis gimbal ensures that your shots remain stable and smooth, even in windy conditions. Camera Resolution: 48MP Video Resolution: 4K at 60fps Gimbal: 3-axis stabilization Low-Light Performance: Excellent DJI Mini 2 SE Camera The DJI Mini 2 SE comes with a 12MP camera, which offers solid quality for casual use and basic content creation. It supports 4K video at 30fps, making it perfect for beginners who want high-definition video without the complexity or price of a professional drone. While the camera resolution isn’t as high as the Mini 3 Pro, it still offers great performance for standard recreational flying and social media content. Camera Resolution: 12MP Video Resolution: 4K at 30fps Gimbal: 2-axis stabilization Low-Light Performance: Good for general use 3. Battery Life: How Long Can You Fly? DJI Mini 3 Pro Battery Life The DJI Mini 3 Pro offers an outstanding flight time of up to 34 minutes with the standard battery and can be extended to 47 minutes with the larger battery option. This extended battery life is ideal for professional use, particularly if you need to capture long aerial shots or need more time to explore larger areas. DJI Mini 2 SE Battery Life The DJI Mini 2 SE provides a slightly shorter flight time, up to 31 minutes per charge. While it’s not as long as the Mini 3 Pro, it still offers a solid duration for casual drone flights, perfect for new pilots or short photography sessions. 4. Flight Features and Performance: What Sets Them Apart? DJI Mini 3 Pro Performance The Mini 3 Pro is packed with advanced features, making it suitable for both hobbyists and more serious drone pilots. It comes with obstacle sensors on the front, back, and bottom, making it safer to fly in tight or cluttered spaces. Obstacle Avoidance: Yes (front, rear, downward) Flight Modes: ActiveTrack, FocusTrack, Mastershots, and more Max Speed: 16 m/s (approximately 57.6 km/h) Advanced Stability: Yes, even in windy conditions DJI Mini 2 SE Performance The Mini 2 SE is designed for beginner and intermediate drone users who want a simple, fun, and safe flying experience. While it lacks advanced obstacle avoidance sensors, it still offers GPS stability and QuickShots, which help capture creative shots with ease. Its maximum speed is slower than the Mini 3 Pro, but still suitable for most recreational flights. Obstacle Avoidance: No Flight Modes: QuickShots (Dronie, Circle, Helix) Max Speed: 8 m/s (approximately 28.8 km/h) Stability: Good for casual flying 5. Which Drone Should You Choose in India? When deciding between the DJI Mini 3 Pro vs DJI Mini 2 SE, it ultimately boils down to your budget and requirements. Choose the DJI Mini 3 Pro if: You need professional-grade camera quality, with 4K video at 60fps and a 48MP camera. You want advanced flight features like obstacle avoidance, ActiveTrack, and FocusTrack. You’re a content creator, real estate agent, or professional photographer looking to elevate your shots. You’re willing to invest in a drone with extended flight time and more powerful performance. You require superior stability and safety features for complex flying environments. Choose the DJI Mini 2 SE if: You are a beginner or hobbyist looking for an affordable and easy-to-use drone. You need a drone with good image quality for casual use, social media content, or fun flights. You’re okay with fewer advanced features, such as the lack of obstacle avoidance and fewer intelligent flight modes. You don’t mind a shorter flight time and a more basic performance compared to the Mini 3 Pro. Conclusion: Which Drone is the Right Choice for You? Both the DJI Mini 3 Pro and DJI Mini 2 SE are excellent drones, but they cater to different types of users. The Mini 3 Pro is the best choice for those seeking a top-tier drone with professional-level performance, while the Mini 2 SE is perfect for beginners or those on a budget who still want a solid drone for recreational flying. If you’re looking for exceptional image quality, advanced flight features, and longer flight time, the DJI Mini 3 Pro in India is the better choice, albeit at a higher price. On the other hand, if you're just starting out or prefer a simpler, more affordable option, the DJI Mini 2 SE offers excellent value at a fraction of the price. Ultimately, both drones provide great performance for their respective price points, making either choice a good investment for Indian consumers looking to explore the world of drone flying. For more information you can visit - https://flyandtech.com/
    FLYANDTECH.COM
    Buy the Best Drone Camera Online in India | Fly and Tech
    Buy the best drone camera online in India at Fly and Tech. Discover pro drone camera options with advanced features for aerial photography.
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 8037 Vue
  • Born in the heat of war, dead from the cold: Gaza’s children are freezing to death
    Alison Weir December 31, 2024 child starvation, Gaza, war on children
    Gaza City, Nov 10, 2024



    Left without power or shelter, Palestinians are struggling to keep their children warm – at least five have frozen to death in the last two weeks

    By Maha Hussaini in Gaza, occupied Palestine and Mohammed al-Hajjar, reposted from Middle East Eye, Dec. 30, 2024

    A dewdrop fell from the roof of a tent on to Yahya Muhammed al-Batran’s nose, waking him to the news that his newborn son, one half of a pair of twin brothers, had frozen to death overnight on Sunday.

    Originally from Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip, Batran’s wife had given birth a month earlier. The children’s first home was a makeshift tent for the displaced, patched over with blankets, in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza.

    The rudimentary protection from the winter cold and the lack of appropriate clothing meant the boys were at risk from the outset.

    Recalling the discovery that his child had died, Batran said: “My wife was awake. I asked her what was wrong, and she pointed to Jumaa and shook her head.

    “She said: ‘Ali seems half alive. But Jumaa, I’ve been trying to wake him for a while, and he won’t wake up.’

    “She said that his head felt like ice. He was pale and completely lifeless.”

    Batran wrapped his son in a blanket and rushed him to al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah.

    “When I got there, the doctor said: ‘May God grant you patience; he’s dead.”

    Batran’s remaining twin son remains in critical condition, as he also suffers from the effects of hyperthermia.

    Israel has destroyed a vast majority of buildings in Gaza and has cut off fuel and electricity supplies to its residents.

    More than 2.3 million Palestinians are huddled together in an increasingly small territory as Israel ethnically cleanses the northern half of the strip.

    The Batran family’s experience reflects that of hundreds of thousands of others, forced from temporary home to temporary home as Israel carries out its campaign of killing and destruction.

    In their case, there has been no respite from death.

    “We came to central Gaza to protect ourselves and our children from the death we saw back in northern Gaza,” Batran told Middle East Eye.

    “We were staying at a school in al-Maghazi, but after it was bombed, we fled to Deir al-Balah and stayed in a tent,” he added.

    “Two of my nephews and three of my in-laws were martyred a few weeks ago. A week after my brothers’ sons were killed, God blessed me with twin boys.

    “I named one after his uncle who was previously martyred, Jumaa, and the other after my nephew who was martyred recently, Ali.”

    Jumaa and Ali were born prematurely at eight months but were in stable condition at the time.

    Jumaa’s death takes the total number of children who have frozen to death in Gaza in the last fortnight to at least five.

    They include Aisha al-Qassas, who was 21 days old; Ali Essam Saqr, who was 23 days old; Ali Hussam Azzam, who was four days old; Sila Mahmoud al-Fassih, who was 14 days old; and Jumaa al-Batran, who was one month old.

    A sixth adult victim, a nurse named Ahmed al-Zaharna, was also found dead in his tent in Mawasi, Khan Younis, due to hypothermia.

    Lack of postnatal care

    As of September, more than 525,000 Palestinian women in Gaza have lost access to critical services, including prenatal and postnatal care, family planning and infection treatment, according to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).

    Of these, over 17,000 pregnant women are facing starvation, with almost 11,000 already suffering from severe food shortages as man-made famine threatens the most vulnerable.

    “This lack of proper nutrition – combined with the immense stress of their situation – is leading to a rise in preterm births, low-birth-weight babies, and increased risks of stillbirths and developmental delays,” the UNFPA stated on its website.

    Due to the limited capacity of hospitals and the overwhelming number of cases, the Batran twins were discharged from their incubator early, and their family was forced to take them back to their makeshift tent.

    “I had no money to buy them clothes or blankets. Some neighbours donated a few clothes, but the twins needed something like a hospital incubator with nylon [for insulation] to keep them warm,” their father said.

    “I couldn’t even afford to buy 4m of nylon. I swear to God, I would cover them with my only blanket and spend the entire night freezing,” he added.

    “I went to Unrwa [the UN agency for Palestinian refugees], and they gave me a device that could be charged to keep the babies warm. But it could only work for three hours before needing to be recharged. I would use it for an hour and a half for each infant.”

    To recharge the device, Batran would go to the hospital twice a day and use the electricity provided by its power generators.

    But on the night Jumaa froze to death, the device had already lost charge from earlier use.

    ‘Verge of madness’

    Since the start of its war on Gaza in October 2023, Israel has cut off electricity, severely restricted the entry of fuel and bombed much of the electricity infrastructure in the blockaded enclave.

    As a result, Gaza’s residents are enduring a complete energy blackout that has lasted 14 months.

    While solar power has helped some Palestinians generate energy, it has not been enough to meet their needs.

    Dr Hani al-Faleet, a paediatric specialist at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, said there have been cases where children were close to death but managed to survive.

    “The situation is deeply sad because it could have been prevented if there was proper heating, clothing, and nutrition available,” Faleet said.

    “Extreme cold significantly impacts the body’s organ functions, disrupting the heart and circulatory system,” he added.

    As cases of hypothermia increase and temperatures continue to drop in Gaza, parents have become increasingly paranoid about the risk of their children becoming the next victims of the cold.

    In a post on the social media platform X, Nour, a Palestinian displaced mother in the central Gaza Strip, wrote: “I cannot sleep. In the suffocating darkness, I feel their breaths beneath their noses to ensure they haven’t frozen to death yet. I cannot sleep. I’m on the verge of madness”

    In al-Zawaida in central Gaza, Hamed Ahmed, a father of three, pricks his newborn’s feet with a pin as she sleeps to ensure she still feels it.

    “My tent is made of bits of nylon and fabric, set up near the sea. At night, the temperature drops so much that we adults shiver and freeze – imagine the children,” he told MEE.

    “Normally, at the start of winter, we would shop for new clothes for the kids. But now, with three children, my wife and myself, we would need a massive budget to buy clothes.

    “Today, a single pair of pyjamas costs 150-180 shekels ($40-50), and I’m unemployed now, so I didn’t buy them anything.”

    For more than a year, Israel has severely restricted the entry of goods into Gaza, including winter clothes, with only limited supplies entering as part of international aid.

    As a result, the central and southern Gaza Strip, currently home to around 2 million residents and displaced people, is facing a shortage of winter clothes and blankets.

    If some items are brought by traders from northern Gaza, they are sold at more than triple their pre-war prices.

    “After hearing about the children who have died from the cold, we cannot sleep at night as we keep checking to see if they are covered and warm.

    “My wife and I take turns to stay awake to make sure our 22-day-old daughter is still alive.

    “We feel her feet regularly to see if they are cold or warm.”

    Maha Hussaini is an award-winning journalist and human rights activist based in Gaza. Maha started her journalism career by covering Israel’s military campaign on the Gaza Strip in July 2014. In 2020, she won the prestigious Martin Adler Prize for her work as a freelance journalist.

    Mohammed al-Hajjar is a Gaza-based Palestinian photographer and journalist who has worked in media since 2007 for several newspapers and agencies. He has won several local and international journalism awards.

    Founded in April 2014, Middle East Eye is an independently funded digital news organisation covering stories from the Middle East and North Africa, as well as related content from beyond the region.

    https://israelpalestinenews.org/born-in-the-heat-of-war-dead-from-the-cold-gazas-children-are-freezing-to-death/
    Born in the heat of war, dead from the cold: Gaza’s children are freezing to death Alison Weir December 31, 2024 child starvation, Gaza, war on children Gaza City, Nov 10, 2024 Left without power or shelter, Palestinians are struggling to keep their children warm – at least five have frozen to death in the last two weeks By Maha Hussaini in Gaza, occupied Palestine and Mohammed al-Hajjar, reposted from Middle East Eye, Dec. 30, 2024 A dewdrop fell from the roof of a tent on to Yahya Muhammed al-Batran’s nose, waking him to the news that his newborn son, one half of a pair of twin brothers, had frozen to death overnight on Sunday. Originally from Beit Lahia in the northern Gaza Strip, Batran’s wife had given birth a month earlier. The children’s first home was a makeshift tent for the displaced, patched over with blankets, in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. The rudimentary protection from the winter cold and the lack of appropriate clothing meant the boys were at risk from the outset. Recalling the discovery that his child had died, Batran said: “My wife was awake. I asked her what was wrong, and she pointed to Jumaa and shook her head. “She said: ‘Ali seems half alive. But Jumaa, I’ve been trying to wake him for a while, and he won’t wake up.’ “She said that his head felt like ice. He was pale and completely lifeless.” Batran wrapped his son in a blanket and rushed him to al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah. “When I got there, the doctor said: ‘May God grant you patience; he’s dead.” Batran’s remaining twin son remains in critical condition, as he also suffers from the effects of hyperthermia. Israel has destroyed a vast majority of buildings in Gaza and has cut off fuel and electricity supplies to its residents. More than 2.3 million Palestinians are huddled together in an increasingly small territory as Israel ethnically cleanses the northern half of the strip. The Batran family’s experience reflects that of hundreds of thousands of others, forced from temporary home to temporary home as Israel carries out its campaign of killing and destruction. In their case, there has been no respite from death. “We came to central Gaza to protect ourselves and our children from the death we saw back in northern Gaza,” Batran told Middle East Eye. “We were staying at a school in al-Maghazi, but after it was bombed, we fled to Deir al-Balah and stayed in a tent,” he added. “Two of my nephews and three of my in-laws were martyred a few weeks ago. A week after my brothers’ sons were killed, God blessed me with twin boys. “I named one after his uncle who was previously martyred, Jumaa, and the other after my nephew who was martyred recently, Ali.” Jumaa and Ali were born prematurely at eight months but were in stable condition at the time. Jumaa’s death takes the total number of children who have frozen to death in Gaza in the last fortnight to at least five. They include Aisha al-Qassas, who was 21 days old; Ali Essam Saqr, who was 23 days old; Ali Hussam Azzam, who was four days old; Sila Mahmoud al-Fassih, who was 14 days old; and Jumaa al-Batran, who was one month old. A sixth adult victim, a nurse named Ahmed al-Zaharna, was also found dead in his tent in Mawasi, Khan Younis, due to hypothermia. Lack of postnatal care As of September, more than 525,000 Palestinian women in Gaza have lost access to critical services, including prenatal and postnatal care, family planning and infection treatment, according to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Of these, over 17,000 pregnant women are facing starvation, with almost 11,000 already suffering from severe food shortages as man-made famine threatens the most vulnerable. “This lack of proper nutrition – combined with the immense stress of their situation – is leading to a rise in preterm births, low-birth-weight babies, and increased risks of stillbirths and developmental delays,” the UNFPA stated on its website. Due to the limited capacity of hospitals and the overwhelming number of cases, the Batran twins were discharged from their incubator early, and their family was forced to take them back to their makeshift tent. “I had no money to buy them clothes or blankets. Some neighbours donated a few clothes, but the twins needed something like a hospital incubator with nylon [for insulation] to keep them warm,” their father said. “I couldn’t even afford to buy 4m of nylon. I swear to God, I would cover them with my only blanket and spend the entire night freezing,” he added. “I went to Unrwa [the UN agency for Palestinian refugees], and they gave me a device that could be charged to keep the babies warm. But it could only work for three hours before needing to be recharged. I would use it for an hour and a half for each infant.” To recharge the device, Batran would go to the hospital twice a day and use the electricity provided by its power generators. But on the night Jumaa froze to death, the device had already lost charge from earlier use. ‘Verge of madness’ Since the start of its war on Gaza in October 2023, Israel has cut off electricity, severely restricted the entry of fuel and bombed much of the electricity infrastructure in the blockaded enclave. As a result, Gaza’s residents are enduring a complete energy blackout that has lasted 14 months. While solar power has helped some Palestinians generate energy, it has not been enough to meet their needs. Dr Hani al-Faleet, a paediatric specialist at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, said there have been cases where children were close to death but managed to survive. “The situation is deeply sad because it could have been prevented if there was proper heating, clothing, and nutrition available,” Faleet said. “Extreme cold significantly impacts the body’s organ functions, disrupting the heart and circulatory system,” he added. As cases of hypothermia increase and temperatures continue to drop in Gaza, parents have become increasingly paranoid about the risk of their children becoming the next victims of the cold. In a post on the social media platform X, Nour, a Palestinian displaced mother in the central Gaza Strip, wrote: “I cannot sleep. In the suffocating darkness, I feel their breaths beneath their noses to ensure they haven’t frozen to death yet. I cannot sleep. I’m on the verge of madness” In al-Zawaida in central Gaza, Hamed Ahmed, a father of three, pricks his newborn’s feet with a pin as she sleeps to ensure she still feels it. “My tent is made of bits of nylon and fabric, set up near the sea. At night, the temperature drops so much that we adults shiver and freeze – imagine the children,” he told MEE. “Normally, at the start of winter, we would shop for new clothes for the kids. But now, with three children, my wife and myself, we would need a massive budget to buy clothes. “Today, a single pair of pyjamas costs 150-180 shekels ($40-50), and I’m unemployed now, so I didn’t buy them anything.” For more than a year, Israel has severely restricted the entry of goods into Gaza, including winter clothes, with only limited supplies entering as part of international aid. As a result, the central and southern Gaza Strip, currently home to around 2 million residents and displaced people, is facing a shortage of winter clothes and blankets. If some items are brought by traders from northern Gaza, they are sold at more than triple their pre-war prices. “After hearing about the children who have died from the cold, we cannot sleep at night as we keep checking to see if they are covered and warm. “My wife and I take turns to stay awake to make sure our 22-day-old daughter is still alive. “We feel her feet regularly to see if they are cold or warm.” Maha Hussaini is an award-winning journalist and human rights activist based in Gaza. Maha started her journalism career by covering Israel’s military campaign on the Gaza Strip in July 2014. In 2020, she won the prestigious Martin Adler Prize for her work as a freelance journalist. Mohammed al-Hajjar is a Gaza-based Palestinian photographer and journalist who has worked in media since 2007 for several newspapers and agencies. He has won several local and international journalism awards. Founded in April 2014, Middle East Eye is an independently funded digital news organisation covering stories from the Middle East and North Africa, as well as related content from beyond the region. https://israelpalestinenews.org/born-in-the-heat-of-war-dead-from-the-cold-gazas-children-are-freezing-to-death/
    ISRAELPALESTINENEWS.ORG
    Born in the heat of war, dead from the cold: Gaza’s children are freezing to death
    Left without power or shelter, Palestinians are struggling to keep their children warm during the winter. At least five children have frozen to death in Gaz ...
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 11681 Vue
  • VIDEO: The “Lock Step” Simulation Scenario: “A Coronavirus-like Pandemic that Becomes Trigger for Police State Controls”

    First published on February 5, 2020 at very outset of the Covid-19 Crisis, in-depth analysis of the Simulation of a pandemic conducted in 2010 under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation.

    By now, those following the novel coronavirus epidemic are familiar with Event 201, the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and other ruling-class heavy hitters in October. The media establishment has already picked the story clean, set up and eviscerated a straw man (“No, Bill Gates didn’t cause the coronavirus epidemic, silly conspiracy theorists!”), and convinced the group itself to issue a statement denying their exercise was meant to predict the behavior of the actual virus to follow.

    But few are aware that the epidemic playing out in China and two dozen other countries, including the US, is unfolding in line with a decade-old simulation titled “Lock Step” devised by the Rockefeller Foundation in conjunction with the Global Business Network. The scenario, one of four included in a publication called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society.

    The Lock Step scenario describes “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” In “2012” (i.e. two years after the report’s publication), an “extremely virulent and deadly” strain of influenza originating with wild geese brings the world to its knees, infecting 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million people in just seven months – “the majority of them healthy young adults.” It devastates global economies and ruptures international trade. But not everyone, the Rockefeller Foundation makes clear, is hit equally.

    Countries of Africa, southeast Asia, and central America suffer the worst “in the absence of official containment protocols” – it wouldn’t be the Rockefeller Foundation if someone wasn’t licking their lips at the thought of a mass die-off in the Global South – but western “democracies” also pay the ultimate price. “The United States’ initial policy of ‘strongly discouraging’ citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the US but across borders,” the report warns. But remove such obstacles as ‘individual rights’ and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation gushes:

    “A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”

    The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. First and third world nations alike follow suit by “flexing their authority” and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other “airtight rules and restrictions” – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.”

    This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who “willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight.” Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. It takes over a decade for people to “grow weary” of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality.



    Pin the blame on the dragon

    It remains unclear what – or who – unleashed the novel coronavirus in Wuhan. The initial claim that it originated in bats from a “wet market,” in which live animals are sold and then butchered in front of the customer, couldn’t have been more perfect from a western point of view – wet markets are reviled in the West, where consumers prefer that the animal cruelty required to put meat on their tables happens behind closed doors. While wet markets would seem to improve food safety by making it impossible to sell “mystery,” mislabeled or expired meat, time and again they are fingered as disease vectors by the disapproving West, every time followed by calls to ban them entirely. However, the Huanan seafood market hadn’t sold bats for years, meaning – if the “wet market” hypothesis is to persist – an “intermediate host” species would be required to get the virus to humans. Snakes were nominated, even though scientists weren’t sure they could be infected by a coronavirus – it was more important that they eat bats and were sold at the market. Three weeks after the Huanan seafood market was shuttered and disinfected, a Lancet study put the last nail in the hypothesis’ coffin, revealing the first several coronavirus cases had no exposure to the market at all. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this has not discouraged the media from continuing to blame it for the epidemic.

    Beyond the disintegrating “official story,” rumormongers have pinned the blame on the Chinese government, suggesting that through malice or incompetence Beijing released a virus cooked up in a top-secret bioweapons program operating in the city’s high-security lab. The chief purveyor of this theory is Dany Shoham, an Israeli biosafety analyst, which should raise a forest of red flags in anyone familiar with Israel’s own experiments in gene-targeted biowarfare even before taking into account Shoham’s own history of fraudulently blaming Saddam Hussein’s Iraq for the 2001 anthrax attacks. Other outlets spreading this theory cite American biosafety consultant Tim Trevan, who opined in a 2017 Nature article – published before the Wuhan lab even opened! – that “diversity of viewpoint” and “openness of information” are both critical to the safe functioning of such a high-risk lab and alien to Chinese culture. The persistence of the “lab accident” theory of coronavirus’ creation thus owes more to cultural chauvinism and sinophobia than any fact-based clues.

    While many alt-media outlets have fingered Event 201 as the replica “drill” that so often coincides with a false flag event, few are aware that on the day after that simulation, the 2019 Military World Games kicked off in Wuhan, bringing 300 US military personnel to the city.

    As of February 4, there are over 1,000 times more coronavirus cases in China than outside of it, and the foreign cases appear to be ethnically Chinese where reported. This is not a coincidence – a recent scientific paper revealed the enzyme which serves as a receptor for novel coronavirus is produced by a certain type of lung cell found in “extremely large numbers” in Asian men compared to those of other ethnicities. Even more intriguingly, those lung cells are involved in the expression of “many other genes that positively regulating [sic] viral reproduction and transmission.” The paper’s authors stop short of suggesting the virus came out of a lab, instead drily observing that it seems to have “cleverly evolved to hijack this population of [lung] cells for its reproduction and transmission,” but one man’s clever viral evolution is another’s expert bioweapon development.

    Certainly, American researchers have been surreptitiously collecting Chinese DNA for decades. A notorious Harvard School of Public Health program in the mid-1990s drafted village medics to administer “free physicals” to locals “with asthmatic symptoms.” These “checkups” were conducted as part of a genetic project that also involved the US National Institutes of Health and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, supposedly aimed at “identify[ing] and characteriz[ing] genes that play a role in causing asthma and other allergic disorders.” It later emerged that the researchers had secured the required consent forms from neither the local experimental ethics board nor the test subjects themselves. A government inquiry was commandeered by an insider and squelched. Over 200,000 DNA samples were thus collected and spirited out of the country.

    US military literature has been lusting after genetically-targeted weapons for at least 50 years. The infamous Project for a New American Century, whose members have been steering the US ship of state into a series of icebergs since the George W. Bush administration, described gene-specific bioweapons as a “politically-useful tool,” part and parcel of the “new dimensions of combat” in which the future’s wars would unfold. In 1998, the year after PNAC’s formation, reports Israel was working on just such a weapon to target Arabs while leaving Jews untouched flooded the media – part PR campaign, part warning. And it is DARPA and other divisions of the US military, not the Chinese, that has been intensively studying bat-borne coronaviruses for years, even as their own high-security biowarfare labs are being shut down for shoddy safety procedures.

    Meanwhile, the likelihood of the Chinese government unleashing a genetically-targeted virus on its own population is vanishingly low. Unlike popular attitudes of “white guilt” in the West born of a hangover from colonialism, the Chinese do not traffic in racial self-loathing – indeed, outsiders have accused the Chinese of an unspoken, unshakeable belief in their own racial superiority, and regardless of whether that belief is problematic, it is unlikely to lead to intentional self-genocide. Even if behavior-correcting false flag was sought by Beijing in Hong Kong, where US-backed pro-“democracy” protests have raged destructively for months, such an event would not have been unleashed hundreds of miles away in Wuhan.

    Never let a good crisis go to waste?

    The real-life coronavirus is much less virulent than the pandemic described in Lock Step, with an official death toll of “just” 427 and a global infection toll of “only” 20,629 as of February 4, and the dead were mostly over 60 with preexisting medical issues. Economies worldwide are nevertheless in free-fall just like the simulation predicted. This drop is fueled by scare-stories percolating in establishment media and alt-media alike (the name of an actual article in ZeroHedge by a Rabobank analyst: “What if we are on the brink of an exponential increase in coronavirus cases?”) while videos of dubious origin appearing to show horrific scenes from within China keep the virus viral on social media. Adding to the fear is coronavirus’ lengthy incubation period, up to two weeks in which a carrier could be blithely spreading it to everyone they meet, creating a constant threat of a “boom” in cases just around the corner.

    China’s economy, of course, is being hit the worst, and the epidemic’s timing could not have been more disastrous from Beijing’s point of view, coming on the eve of the Lunar New Year holiday. At this time, some 400 million Chinese travel around the country to see family, mostly in the high-speed bullet trains that have their hub in – you guessed it – Wuhan. With much of this travel having occurred before the city was quarantined, cases are likely in their incubation phase all over the country, making today’s numbers look like a rounding error.

    Correspondingly, the situation couldn’t be better for the American ruling class: a pandemic that targets Asians striking China just when it’s most vulnerable is a powerful blow to the rising superpower. And in case anyone still believes the circumstances of the virus’ ascendance are merely an extended string of coincidences, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross took that plausible deniability and stomped on it last month, unable to stop himself from gushing that coronavirus would “help to accelerate the return of jobs to North America” in an interview with Fox News. Prefacing his victory lap by saying he didn’t “want to talk about a victory lap over a very unfortunate, very malignant disease,” he pointed out that businesses will be forced to take China’s inexplicable susceptibility to deadly viruses into account when reviewing their supply chains. Unmentioned, but adding to the perfect economic storm, was Trump’s signature on the USMCA trade agreement, supposed to bring in an extra 1.2 percentage points in GDP growth.

    “On top of all the other things, you had SARS, you had the African Swine virus there, now you have this,” Ross said, hammering home the point by linking coronavirus to other suspect plagues. Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many – scientists and statesmen as well as alternative media – have raised the alarm about coronavirus. Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus “rumors,” and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. Even on platforms that don’t censor on government orders, the baseless claims from Shoham and other disinfo artists about Chinese biowarfare have muscled any comments from Chinese officials out of the way. Even the former Malaysian PM’s comments are obscured behind a Farsi language barrier – his original comments inexplicably missing from English-language media and reprinted only by Iran’s IRIB News Agency (this author can no longer even find the tweet that alerted her to those comments, but would like to thank that person).

    Coronavirus is not the doomsday epidemic it is being portrayed as by irresponsible media actors. But as the Lock Step scenario makes clear, one does not need massive die-off or victims exploding in geysers of blood in the streets to achieve desired social goals. It’s possible the novel coronavirus epidemic is a “dry run,” a test of both China’s readiness to handle an outbreak and of the international community’s reaction to such a plague. It’s even possible, though unlikely, that the epidemic was a mistake – that the virus escaped from a lab, likely American, by accident.

    It’s also possible the plague may suddenly become more virulent. Certainly the media buzz the first week of February is that coronavirus is close to being declared a “pandemic” by the WHO, which will necessitate the type of control measures hinted at in Lock Step and described more exhaustively in Event 201. From “limited internet shutdowns” and “enforcement actions against fake news” to government bailouts of “core” industries, mandatory vaccinations, property seizures, and other police-state provisions laid out in the Model State Emergency Health Powers Acts passed in many US states in the paranoid aftermath of 9/11, the totalitarian nature of these provisions is limited only by the imagination of the regime carrying them out. Once events proceed to that stage, it is extremely difficult to reverse them. We would be wise not to allow this to happen.

    *

    Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.

    Helen Buyniski is a journalist and photographer based in New York City. Her work has appeared on RT, Global Research, Ghion Journal, Progressive Radio Network, and Veterans Today. Helen has a BA in Journalism from New School University and also studied at Columbia University and New York University. Find more of her work at http://helenofdestroy.com and http://medium.com/@helen.buyniski or follow her on Twitter at @velocirapture23. She is a frequent contributor to Global Research.


    VIDEO: The “Lock Step” Simulation Scenario: “A Coronavirus-like Pandemic that Becomes Trigger for Police State Controls”

    First published on February 5, 2020 at very outset of the Covid-19 Crisis, in-depth analysis of the Simulation of a pandemic conducted in 2010 under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation.

    Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/all-sectors-us-establishment-lock-step-deep-states-latest-bio-war/5702773
    VIDEO: The “Lock Step” Simulation Scenario: “A Coronavirus-like Pandemic that Becomes Trigger for Police State Controls” First published on February 5, 2020 at very outset of the Covid-19 Crisis, in-depth analysis of the Simulation of a pandemic conducted in 2010 under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation. By now, those following the novel coronavirus epidemic are familiar with Event 201, the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and other ruling-class heavy hitters in October. The media establishment has already picked the story clean, set up and eviscerated a straw man (“No, Bill Gates didn’t cause the coronavirus epidemic, silly conspiracy theorists!”), and convinced the group itself to issue a statement denying their exercise was meant to predict the behavior of the actual virus to follow. But few are aware that the epidemic playing out in China and two dozen other countries, including the US, is unfolding in line with a decade-old simulation titled “Lock Step” devised by the Rockefeller Foundation in conjunction with the Global Business Network. The scenario, one of four included in a publication called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” in 2010, describes a coronavirus-like pandemic that becomes the trigger for the imposition of police-state controls on movement, economy, and other areas of society. The Lock Step scenario describes “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” In “2012” (i.e. two years after the report’s publication), an “extremely virulent and deadly” strain of influenza originating with wild geese brings the world to its knees, infecting 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million people in just seven months – “the majority of them healthy young adults.” It devastates global economies and ruptures international trade. But not everyone, the Rockefeller Foundation makes clear, is hit equally. Countries of Africa, southeast Asia, and central America suffer the worst “in the absence of official containment protocols” – it wouldn’t be the Rockefeller Foundation if someone wasn’t licking their lips at the thought of a mass die-off in the Global South – but western “democracies” also pay the ultimate price. “The United States’ initial policy of ‘strongly discouraging’ citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the US but across borders,” the report warns. But remove such obstacles as ‘individual rights’ and you have a recipe for surviving, even thriving in the event of a pandemic, the Foundation gushes: “A few countries did fare better – China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing-off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.” The message is clear – police state good, freedom bad. And other governments rapidly get the message, according to the simulation. First and third world nations alike follow suit by “flexing their authority” and imposing quarantines, body-temperature checks, and other “airtight rules and restrictions” – most of which, the report is careful to note, remain in place even as the pandemic recedes into the past. “In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems – from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty – leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.” This global power-grab is facilitated by a frightened citizenry who “willingly gave up some of their sovereignty – and their privacy – to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability…tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight.” Everything from tighter biometric identification to stricter industrial regulation is welcomed with open arms. It takes over a decade for people to “grow weary” of the authoritarian controls imposed in the wake of the pandemic, and hints that even the civil unrest that ultimately manifests is focused on the developed world. After all, a popular uprising in the technocratic police state envisioned by the simulation would be all but impossible – as it will be in real life once 5G makes real-time total surveillance of all cities a reality. Pin the blame on the dragon It remains unclear what – or who – unleashed the novel coronavirus in Wuhan. The initial claim that it originated in bats from a “wet market,” in which live animals are sold and then butchered in front of the customer, couldn’t have been more perfect from a western point of view – wet markets are reviled in the West, where consumers prefer that the animal cruelty required to put meat on their tables happens behind closed doors. While wet markets would seem to improve food safety by making it impossible to sell “mystery,” mislabeled or expired meat, time and again they are fingered as disease vectors by the disapproving West, every time followed by calls to ban them entirely. However, the Huanan seafood market hadn’t sold bats for years, meaning – if the “wet market” hypothesis is to persist – an “intermediate host” species would be required to get the virus to humans. Snakes were nominated, even though scientists weren’t sure they could be infected by a coronavirus – it was more important that they eat bats and were sold at the market. Three weeks after the Huanan seafood market was shuttered and disinfected, a Lancet study put the last nail in the hypothesis’ coffin, revealing the first several coronavirus cases had no exposure to the market at all. Perhaps unsurprisingly, this has not discouraged the media from continuing to blame it for the epidemic. Beyond the disintegrating “official story,” rumormongers have pinned the blame on the Chinese government, suggesting that through malice or incompetence Beijing released a virus cooked up in a top-secret bioweapons program operating in the city’s high-security lab. The chief purveyor of this theory is Dany Shoham, an Israeli biosafety analyst, which should raise a forest of red flags in anyone familiar with Israel’s own experiments in gene-targeted biowarfare even before taking into account Shoham’s own history of fraudulently blaming Saddam Hussein’s Iraq for the 2001 anthrax attacks. Other outlets spreading this theory cite American biosafety consultant Tim Trevan, who opined in a 2017 Nature article – published before the Wuhan lab even opened! – that “diversity of viewpoint” and “openness of information” are both critical to the safe functioning of such a high-risk lab and alien to Chinese culture. The persistence of the “lab accident” theory of coronavirus’ creation thus owes more to cultural chauvinism and sinophobia than any fact-based clues. While many alt-media outlets have fingered Event 201 as the replica “drill” that so often coincides with a false flag event, few are aware that on the day after that simulation, the 2019 Military World Games kicked off in Wuhan, bringing 300 US military personnel to the city. As of February 4, there are over 1,000 times more coronavirus cases in China than outside of it, and the foreign cases appear to be ethnically Chinese where reported. This is not a coincidence – a recent scientific paper revealed the enzyme which serves as a receptor for novel coronavirus is produced by a certain type of lung cell found in “extremely large numbers” in Asian men compared to those of other ethnicities. Even more intriguingly, those lung cells are involved in the expression of “many other genes that positively regulating [sic] viral reproduction and transmission.” The paper’s authors stop short of suggesting the virus came out of a lab, instead drily observing that it seems to have “cleverly evolved to hijack this population of [lung] cells for its reproduction and transmission,” but one man’s clever viral evolution is another’s expert bioweapon development. Certainly, American researchers have been surreptitiously collecting Chinese DNA for decades. A notorious Harvard School of Public Health program in the mid-1990s drafted village medics to administer “free physicals” to locals “with asthmatic symptoms.” These “checkups” were conducted as part of a genetic project that also involved the US National Institutes of Health and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, supposedly aimed at “identify[ing] and characteriz[ing] genes that play a role in causing asthma and other allergic disorders.” It later emerged that the researchers had secured the required consent forms from neither the local experimental ethics board nor the test subjects themselves. A government inquiry was commandeered by an insider and squelched. Over 200,000 DNA samples were thus collected and spirited out of the country. US military literature has been lusting after genetically-targeted weapons for at least 50 years. The infamous Project for a New American Century, whose members have been steering the US ship of state into a series of icebergs since the George W. Bush administration, described gene-specific bioweapons as a “politically-useful tool,” part and parcel of the “new dimensions of combat” in which the future’s wars would unfold. In 1998, the year after PNAC’s formation, reports Israel was working on just such a weapon to target Arabs while leaving Jews untouched flooded the media – part PR campaign, part warning. And it is DARPA and other divisions of the US military, not the Chinese, that has been intensively studying bat-borne coronaviruses for years, even as their own high-security biowarfare labs are being shut down for shoddy safety procedures. Meanwhile, the likelihood of the Chinese government unleashing a genetically-targeted virus on its own population is vanishingly low. Unlike popular attitudes of “white guilt” in the West born of a hangover from colonialism, the Chinese do not traffic in racial self-loathing – indeed, outsiders have accused the Chinese of an unspoken, unshakeable belief in their own racial superiority, and regardless of whether that belief is problematic, it is unlikely to lead to intentional self-genocide. Even if behavior-correcting false flag was sought by Beijing in Hong Kong, where US-backed pro-“democracy” protests have raged destructively for months, such an event would not have been unleashed hundreds of miles away in Wuhan. Never let a good crisis go to waste? The real-life coronavirus is much less virulent than the pandemic described in Lock Step, with an official death toll of “just” 427 and a global infection toll of “only” 20,629 as of February 4, and the dead were mostly over 60 with preexisting medical issues. Economies worldwide are nevertheless in free-fall just like the simulation predicted. This drop is fueled by scare-stories percolating in establishment media and alt-media alike (the name of an actual article in ZeroHedge by a Rabobank analyst: “What if we are on the brink of an exponential increase in coronavirus cases?”) while videos of dubious origin appearing to show horrific scenes from within China keep the virus viral on social media. Adding to the fear is coronavirus’ lengthy incubation period, up to two weeks in which a carrier could be blithely spreading it to everyone they meet, creating a constant threat of a “boom” in cases just around the corner. China’s economy, of course, is being hit the worst, and the epidemic’s timing could not have been more disastrous from Beijing’s point of view, coming on the eve of the Lunar New Year holiday. At this time, some 400 million Chinese travel around the country to see family, mostly in the high-speed bullet trains that have their hub in – you guessed it – Wuhan. With much of this travel having occurred before the city was quarantined, cases are likely in their incubation phase all over the country, making today’s numbers look like a rounding error. Correspondingly, the situation couldn’t be better for the American ruling class: a pandemic that targets Asians striking China just when it’s most vulnerable is a powerful blow to the rising superpower. And in case anyone still believes the circumstances of the virus’ ascendance are merely an extended string of coincidences, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross took that plausible deniability and stomped on it last month, unable to stop himself from gushing that coronavirus would “help to accelerate the return of jobs to North America” in an interview with Fox News. Prefacing his victory lap by saying he didn’t “want to talk about a victory lap over a very unfortunate, very malignant disease,” he pointed out that businesses will be forced to take China’s inexplicable susceptibility to deadly viruses into account when reviewing their supply chains. Unmentioned, but adding to the perfect economic storm, was Trump’s signature on the USMCA trade agreement, supposed to bring in an extra 1.2 percentage points in GDP growth. “On top of all the other things, you had SARS, you had the African Swine virus there, now you have this,” Ross said, hammering home the point by linking coronavirus to other suspect plagues. Just as many scientists concluded SARS was a manmade bioweapon, many – scientists and statesmen as well as alternative media – have raised the alarm about coronavirus. Good luck finding any of their statements on Google, however. Facebook, Youtube and Twitter have been hard at work removing coronavirus “rumors,” and Google has memory-holed hundreds of search results regarding Chinese accusations of biowarfare. Even on platforms that don’t censor on government orders, the baseless claims from Shoham and other disinfo artists about Chinese biowarfare have muscled any comments from Chinese officials out of the way. Even the former Malaysian PM’s comments are obscured behind a Farsi language barrier – his original comments inexplicably missing from English-language media and reprinted only by Iran’s IRIB News Agency (this author can no longer even find the tweet that alerted her to those comments, but would like to thank that person). Coronavirus is not the doomsday epidemic it is being portrayed as by irresponsible media actors. But as the Lock Step scenario makes clear, one does not need massive die-off or victims exploding in geysers of blood in the streets to achieve desired social goals. It’s possible the novel coronavirus epidemic is a “dry run,” a test of both China’s readiness to handle an outbreak and of the international community’s reaction to such a plague. It’s even possible, though unlikely, that the epidemic was a mistake – that the virus escaped from a lab, likely American, by accident. It’s also possible the plague may suddenly become more virulent. Certainly the media buzz the first week of February is that coronavirus is close to being declared a “pandemic” by the WHO, which will necessitate the type of control measures hinted at in Lock Step and described more exhaustively in Event 201. From “limited internet shutdowns” and “enforcement actions against fake news” to government bailouts of “core” industries, mandatory vaccinations, property seizures, and other police-state provisions laid out in the Model State Emergency Health Powers Acts passed in many US states in the paranoid aftermath of 9/11, the totalitarian nature of these provisions is limited only by the imagination of the regime carrying them out. Once events proceed to that stage, it is extremely difficult to reverse them. We would be wise not to allow this to happen. * Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. Helen Buyniski is a journalist and photographer based in New York City. Her work has appeared on RT, Global Research, Ghion Journal, Progressive Radio Network, and Veterans Today. Helen has a BA in Journalism from New School University and also studied at Columbia University and New York University. Find more of her work at http://helenofdestroy.com and http://medium.com/@helen.buyniski or follow her on Twitter at @velocirapture23. She is a frequent contributor to Global Research. VIDEO: The “Lock Step” Simulation Scenario: “A Coronavirus-like Pandemic that Becomes Trigger for Police State Controls” First published on February 5, 2020 at very outset of the Covid-19 Crisis, in-depth analysis of the Simulation of a pandemic conducted in 2010 under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation. Read here: https://www.globalresearch.ca/all-sectors-us-establishment-lock-step-deep-states-latest-bio-war/5702773
    WWW.GLOBALRESEARCH.CA
    VIDEO: The "Lock Step" Simulation Scenario: "A Coronavirus-like Pandemic that Becomes Trigger for Police State Controls"
    First published on February 5, 2020 at very outset of the Covid-19 Crisis, in-depth analysis of the Simulation of a pandemic conducted in 2010 under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation. By now, those following the novel coronavirus epidemic are familiar with Event 201, the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, …
    0 Commentaires 0 Parts 25276 Vue
Plus de résultats